Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2004 Feb;166(2):753–764. doi: 10.1093/genetics/166.2.753

Mec1 and Rad53 inhibit formation of single-stranded DNA at telomeres of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cdc13-1 mutants.

Xindan Jia 1, Ted Weinert 1, David Lydall 1
PMCID: PMC1470748  PMID: 15020465

Abstract

Here we examine the roles of budding-yeast checkpoint proteins in regulating degradation of dsDNA to ssDNA at unprotected telomeres (in Cdc13 telomere-binding protein defective strains). We find that Rad17, Mec3, as well as Rad24, members of the putative checkpoint clamp loader (Rad24) and sliding clamp (Rad17, Mec3) complexes, are important for promoting degradation of dsDNA in and near telomere repeats. We find that Mec1, Rad53, as well as Rad9, have the opposite role: they inhibit degradation. Downstream checkpoint kinases Chk1 and Dun1 play no detectable role in either promoting degradation or inhibiting it. These data suggest, first, that the checkpoint sliding clamp regulates and/or recruits some nucleases for degradation, and, second, that Mec1 activates Rad9 to activate Rad53 to inhibit degradation. Further analysis shows that Rad9 inhibits ssDNA generation by both Mec1/Rad53-dependent and -independent pathways. Exo1 appears to be targeted by the Mec1/Rad53-dependent pathway. Finally, analysis of double mutants suggests a minor role for Mec1 in promoting Rad24-dependent degradation of dsDNA. Thus, checkpoint proteins orchestrate carefully ssDNA production at unprotected telomeres.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (350.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alcasabas A. A., Osborn A. J., Bachant J., Hu F., Werler P. J., Bousset K., Furuya K., Diffley J. F., Carr A. M., Elledge S. J. Mrc1 transduces signals of DNA replication stress to activate Rad53. Nat Cell Biol. 2001 Nov;3(11):958–965. doi: 10.1038/ncb1101-958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bermudez Vladimir P., Lindsey-Boltz Laura A., Cesare Anthony J., Maniwa Yoshimasa, Griffith Jack D., Hurwitz Jerard, Sancar Aziz. Loading of the human 9-1-1 checkpoint complex onto DNA by the checkpoint clamp loader hRad17-replication factor C complex in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Feb 10;100(4):1633–1638. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0437927100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blankley Richard T., Lydall David. A domain of Rad9 specifically required for activation of Chk1 in budding yeast. J Cell Sci. 2004 Jan 6;117(Pt 4):601–608. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Booth C., Griffith E., Brady G., Lydall D. Quantitative amplification of single-stranded DNA (QAOS) demonstrates that cdc13-1 mutants generate ssDNA in a telomere to centromere direction. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001 Nov 1;29(21):4414–4422. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.21.4414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Carr Antony M. Molecular biology. Beginning at the end. Science. 2003 Jun 6;300(5625):1512–1513. doi: 10.1126/science.1085689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Emili A. MEC1-dependent phosphorylation of Rad9p in response to DNA damage. Mol Cell. 1998 Aug;2(2):183–189. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80128-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Emili A., Schieltz D. M., Yates J. R., 3rd, Hartwell L. H. Dynamic interaction of DNA damage checkpoint protein Rad53 with chromatin assembly factor Asf1. Mol Cell. 2001 Jan;7(1):13–20. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00150-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gangloff S., Soustelle C., Fabre F. Homologous recombination is responsible for cell death in the absence of the Sgs1 and Srs2 helicases. Nat Genet. 2000 Jun;25(2):192–194. doi: 10.1038/76055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gardner R., Putnam C. W., Weinert T. RAD53, DUN1 and PDS1 define two parallel G2/M checkpoint pathways in budding yeast. EMBO J. 1999 Jun 1;18(11):3173–3185. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.11.3173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Garvik B., Carson M., Hartwell L. Single-stranded DNA arising at telomeres in cdc13 mutants may constitute a specific signal for the RAD9 checkpoint. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Nov;15(11):6128–6138. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.11.6128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gilbert C. S., Green C. M., Lowndes N. F. Budding yeast Rad9 is an ATP-dependent Rad53 activating machine. Mol Cell. 2001 Jul;8(1):129–136. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00267-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Green C. M., Erdjument-Bromage H., Tempst P., Lowndes N. F. A novel Rad24 checkpoint protein complex closely related to replication factor C. Curr Biol. 2000 Jan 13;10(1):39–42. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(99)00263-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hu F., Alcasabas A. A., Elledge S. J. Asf1 links Rad53 to control of chromatin assembly. Genes Dev. 2001 May 1;15(9):1061–1066. doi: 10.1101/gad.873201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kondo T., Wakayama T., Naiki T., Matsumoto K., Sugimoto K. Recruitment of Mec1 and Ddc1 checkpoint proteins to double-strand breaks through distinct mechanisms. Science. 2001 Oct 26;294(5543):867–870. doi: 10.1126/science.1063827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kumagai A., Dunphy W. G. Claspin, a novel protein required for the activation of Chk1 during a DNA replication checkpoint response in Xenopus egg extracts. Mol Cell. 2000 Oct;6(4):839–849. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(05)00092-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lou Zhenkun, Chini Claudia Christiano Silva, Minter-Dykhouse Katherine, Chen Junjie. Mediator of DNA damage checkpoint protein 1 regulates BRCA1 localization and phosphorylation in DNA damage checkpoint control. J Biol Chem. 2003 Feb 27;278(16):13599–13602. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C300060200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lou Zhenkun, Minter-Dykhouse Katherine, Wu Xianglin, Chen Junjie. MDC1 is coupled to activated CHK2 in mammalian DNA damage response pathways. Nature. 2003 Feb 27;421(6926):957–961. doi: 10.1038/nature01447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lydall D., Weinert T. Use of cdc13-1-induced DNA damage to study effects of checkpoint genes on DNA damage processing. Methods Enzymol. 1997;283:410–424. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(97)83034-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lydall D., Weinert T. Yeast checkpoint genes in DNA damage processing: implications for repair and arrest. Science. 1995 Dec 1;270(5241):1488–1491. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5241.1488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lydall David. Hiding at the ends of yeast chromosomes: telomeres, nucleases and checkpoint pathways. J Cell Sci. 2003 Oct 15;116(Pt 20):4057–4065. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Majka Jerzy, Burgers Peter M. J. Yeast Rad17/Mec3/Ddc1: a sliding clamp for the DNA damage checkpoint. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Feb 25;100(5):2249–2254. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0437148100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Melo J. A., Cohen J., Toczyski D. P. Two checkpoint complexes are independently recruited to sites of DNA damage in vivo. Genes Dev. 2001 Nov 1;15(21):2809–2821. doi: 10.1101/gad.903501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Melo Justine, Toczyski David. A unified view of the DNA-damage checkpoint. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2002 Apr;14(2):237–245. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(02)00312-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Mitton-Fry Rachel M., Anderson Emily M., Hughes Timothy R., Lundblad Victoria, Wuttke Deborah S. Conserved structure for single-stranded telomeric DNA recognition. Science. 2002 Apr 5;296(5565):145–147. doi: 10.1126/science.1068799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Nyberg Kara A., Michelson Rhett J., Putnam Charles W., Weinert Ted A. Toward maintaining the genome: DNA damage and replication checkpoints. Annu Rev Genet. 2002 Jun 11;36:617–656. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.36.060402.113540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Osborn Alexander J., Elledge Stephen J., Zou Lee. Checking on the fork: the DNA-replication stress-response pathway. Trends Cell Biol. 2002 Nov;12(11):509–516. doi: 10.1016/s0962-8924(02)02380-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Paciotti V., Lucchini G., Plevani P., Longhese M. P. Mec1p is essential for phosphorylation of the yeast DNA damage checkpoint protein Ddc1p, which physically interacts with Mec3p. EMBO J. 1998 Jul 15;17(14):4199–4209. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.14.4199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Paulovich A. G., Margulies R. U., Garvik B. M., Hartwell L. H. RAD9, RAD17, and RAD24 are required for S phase regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae in response to DNA damage. Genetics. 1997 Jan;145(1):45–62. doi: 10.1093/genetics/145.1.45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Pellicioli A., Lucca C., Liberi G., Marini F., Lopes M., Plevani P., Romano A., Di Fiore P. P., Foiani M. Activation of Rad53 kinase in response to DNA damage and its effect in modulating phosphorylation of the lagging strand DNA polymerase. EMBO J. 1999 Nov 15;18(22):6561–6572. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.22.6561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Rouse John, Jackson Stephen P. Interfaces between the detection, signaling, and repair of DNA damage. Science. 2002 Jul 26;297(5581):547–551. doi: 10.1126/science.1074740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sanchez Y., Bachant J., Wang H., Hu F., Liu D., Tetzlaff M., Elledge S. J. Control of the DNA damage checkpoint by chk1 and rad53 protein kinases through distinct mechanisms. Science. 1999 Nov 5;286(5442):1166–1171. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5442.1166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Schwartz Marc F., Duong Jimmy K., Sun Zhaoxia, Morrow Jon S., Pradhan Deepti, Stern David F. Rad9 phosphorylation sites couple Rad53 to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA damage checkpoint. Mol Cell. 2002 May;9(5):1055–1065. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(02)00532-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sogo José M., Lopes Massimo, Foiani Marco. Fork reversal and ssDNA accumulation at stalled replication forks owing to checkpoint defects. Science. 2002 Jul 26;297(5581):599–602. doi: 10.1126/science.1074023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Stewart Grant S., Wang Bin, Bignell Colin R., Taylor A. Malcolm R., Elledge Stephen J. MDC1 is a mediator of the mammalian DNA damage checkpoint. Nature. 2003 Feb 27;421(6926):961–966. doi: 10.1038/nature01446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Tanaka K., Russell P. Mrc1 channels the DNA replication arrest signal to checkpoint kinase Cds1. Nat Cell Biol. 2001 Nov;3(11):966–972. doi: 10.1038/ncb1101-966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Vaze Moreshwar B., Pellicioli Achille, Lee Sang Eun, Ira Grzegorz, Liberi Giordano, Arbel-Eden Ayelet, Foiani Marco, Haber James E. Recovery from checkpoint-mediated arrest after repair of a double-strand break requires Srs2 helicase. Mol Cell. 2002 Aug;10(2):373–385. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(02)00593-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Vialard J. E., Gilbert C. S., Green C. M., Lowndes N. F. The budding yeast Rad9 checkpoint protein is subjected to Mec1/Tel1-dependent hyperphosphorylation and interacts with Rad53 after DNA damage. EMBO J. 1998 Oct 1;17(19):5679–5688. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.19.5679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Weinert T. A., Hartwell L. H. Cell cycle arrest of cdc mutants and specificity of the RAD9 checkpoint. Genetics. 1993 May;134(1):63–80. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.1.63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Zou Lee, Elledge Stephen J. Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science. 2003 Jun 6;300(5625):1542–1548. doi: 10.1126/science.1083430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES