Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2000 Sep;156(1):385–399. doi: 10.1093/genetics/156.1.385

Contrasting patterns of nonneutral evolution in proteins encoded in nuclear and mitochondrial genomes.

D M Weinreich 1, D M Rand 1
PMCID: PMC1461243  PMID: 10978302

Abstract

We report that patterns of nonneutral DNA sequence evolution among published nuclear and mitochondrially encoded protein-coding loci differ significantly in animals. Whereas an apparent excess of amino acid polymorphism is seen in most (25/31) mitochondrial genes, this pattern is seen in fewer than half (15/36) of the nuclear data sets. This differentiation is even greater among data sets with significant departures from neutrality (14/15 vs. 1/6). Using forward simulations, we examined patterns of nonneutral evolution using parameters chosen to mimic the differences between mitochondrial and nuclear genetics (we varied recombination rate, population size, mutation rate, selective dominance, and intensity of germ line bottleneck). Patterns of evolution were correlated only with effective population size and strength of selection, and no single genetic factor explains the empirical contrast in patterns. We further report that in Arabidopsis thaliana, a highly self-fertilizing plant with effectively low recombination, five of six published nuclear data sets also exhibit an excess of amino acid polymorphism. We suggest that the contrast between nuclear and mitochondrial nonneutrality in animals stems from differences in rates of recombination in conjunction with a distribution of selective effects. If the majority of mutations segregating in populations are deleterious, high linkage may hinder the spread of the occasional beneficial mutation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (286.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Awadalla P., Eyre-Walker A., Smith J. M. Linkage disequilibrium and recombination in hominid mitochondrial DNA. Science. 1999 Dec 24;286(5449):2524–2525. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5449.2524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Balakirev E. S., Balakirev E. I., Rodríguez-Trelles F., Ayala F. J. Molecular evolution of two linked genes, Est-6 and Sod, in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1999 Nov;153(3):1357–1369. doi: 10.1093/genetics/153.3.1357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ballard J. W., Kreitman M. Unraveling selection in the mitochondrial genome of Drosophila. Genetics. 1994 Nov;138(3):757–772. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.3.757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Begun D. J., Aquadro C. F. Evolutionary inferences from DNA variation at the 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase locus in natural populations of drosophila: selection and geographic differentiation. Genetics. 1994 Jan;136(1):155–171. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.1.155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bendall K. E., Macaulay V. A., Baker J. R., Sykes B. C. Heteroplasmic point mutations in the human mtDNA control region. Am J Hum Genet. 1996 Dec;59(6):1276–1287. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bergstrom C. T., Pritchard J. Germline bottlenecks and the evolutionary maintenance of mitochondrial genomes. Genetics. 1998 Aug;149(4):2135–2146. doi: 10.1093/genetics/149.4.2135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Birky C. W., Jr, Maruyama T., Fuerst P. An approach to population and evolutionary genetic theory for genes in mitochondria and chloroplasts, and some results. Genetics. 1983 Mar;103(3):513–527. doi: 10.1093/genetics/103.3.513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Brookfield J. F., Sharp P. M. Neutralism and selectionism face up to DNA data. Trends Genet. 1994 Apr;10(4):109–111. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(94)90201-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Charlesworth B., Morgan M. T., Charlesworth D. The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. Genetics. 1993 Aug;134(4):1289–1303. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.4.1289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Eanes W. F., Kirchner M., Yoon J. Evidence for adaptive evolution of the G6pd gene in the Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans lineages. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Aug 15;90(16):7475–7479. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.16.7475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Eyre-Walker A., Smith N. H., Smith J. M. How clonal are human mitochondria? Proc Biol Sci. 1999 Mar 7;266(1418):477–483. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fry A. J., Zink R. M. Geographic analysis of nucleotide diversity and song sparrow (Aves: Emberizidae) population history. Mol Ecol. 1998 Oct;7(10):1303–1313. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00462.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gillespie J. H. Substitution processes in molecular evolution. I. Uniform and clustered substitutions in a haploid model. Genetics. 1993 Jul;134(3):971–981. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.3.971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gillespie J. H. The role of population size in molecular evolution. Theor Popul Biol. 1999 Apr;55(2):145–156. doi: 10.1006/tpbi.1998.1391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gleason J. M., Powell J. R. Interspecific and intraspecific comparisons of the period locus in the Drosophila willistoni sibling species. Mol Biol Evol. 1997 Jul;14(7):741–753. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hamblin M. T., Aquadro C. F. DNA sequence variation and the recombinational landscape in Drosophila pseudoobscura: a study of the second chromosome. Genetics. 1999 Oct;153(2):859–869. doi: 10.1093/genetics/153.2.859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hamblin M. T., Aquadro C. F. High nucleotide sequence variation in a region of low recombination in Drosophila simulans is consistent with the background selection model. Mol Biol Evol. 1996 Oct;13(8):1133–1140. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hasegawa M., Cao Y., Yang Z. Preponderance of slightly deleterious polymorphism in mitochondrial DNA: nonsynonymous/synonymous rate ratio is much higher within species than between species. Mol Biol Evol. 1998 Nov;15(11):1499–1505. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hasson E., Wang I. N., Zeng L. W., Kreitman M., Eanes W. F. Nucleotide variation in the triosephosphate isomerase (Tpi) locus of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Mol Biol Evol. 1998 Jun;15(6):756–769. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hauswirth W. W., Laipis P. J. Mitochondrial DNA polymorphism in a maternal lineage of Holstein cows. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Aug;79(15):4686–4690. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.15.4686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hughes A. L., Nei M. Pattern of nucleotide substitution at major histocompatibility complex class I loci reveals overdominant selection. Nature. 1988 Sep 8;335(6186):167–170. doi: 10.1038/335167a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Jenuth J. P., Peterson A. C., Fu K., Shoubridge E. A. Random genetic drift in the female germline explains the rapid segregation of mammalian mitochondrial DNA. Nat Genet. 1996 Oct;14(2):146–151. doi: 10.1038/ng1096-146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kawabe A., Innan H., Terauchi R., Miyashita N. T. Nucleotide polymorphism in the acidic chitinase locus (ChiA) region of the wild plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Biol Evol. 1997 Dec;14(12):1303–1315. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kimura M. The number of heterozygous nucleotide sites maintained in a finite population due to steady flux of mutations. Genetics. 1969 Apr;61(4):893–903. doi: 10.1093/genetics/61.4.893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. King L. M. The role of gene conversion in determining sequence variation and divergence in the Est-5 gene family in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics. 1998 Jan;148(1):305–315. doi: 10.1093/genetics/148.1.305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kreitman M., Hudson R. R. Inferring the evolutionary histories of the Adh and Adh-dup loci in Drosophila melanogaster from patterns of polymorphism and divergence. Genetics. 1991 Mar;127(3):565–582. doi: 10.1093/genetics/127.3.565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kreitman M. Nucleotide polymorphism at the alcohol dehydrogenase locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Nature. 1983 Aug 4;304(5925):412–417. doi: 10.1038/304412a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kyte J., Doolittle R. F. A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J Mol Biol. 1982 May 5;157(1):105–132. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90515-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Labate J. A., Biermann C. H., Eanes W. F. Nucleotide variation at the runt locus in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Mol Biol Evol. 1999 Jun;16(6):724–731. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Long M., Langley C. H. Natural selection and the origin of jingwei, a chimeric processed functional gene in Drosophila. Science. 1993 Apr 2;260(5104):91–95. doi: 10.1126/science.7682012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. McDonald J. H., Kreitman M. Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila. Nature. 1991 Jun 20;351(6328):652–654. doi: 10.1038/351652a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Messier W., Stewart C. B. Episodic adaptive evolution of primate lysozymes. Nature. 1997 Jan 9;385(6612):151–154. doi: 10.1038/385151a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Miyashita N. T., Kawabe A., Innan H., Terauchi R. Intra- and interspecific DNA variation and codon bias of the alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh) locus in Arabis and Arabidopsis species. Mol Biol Evol. 1998 Nov;15(11):1420–1429. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Moriyama E. N., Powell J. R. Intraspecific nuclear DNA variation in Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol. 1996 Jan;13(1):261–277. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Nachman M. W., Boyer S. N., Aquadro C. F. Nonneutral evolution at the mitochondrial NADH dehydrogenase subunit 3 gene in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Jul 5;91(14):6364–6368. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.14.6364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Nachman M. W. Deleterious mutations in animal mitochondrial DNA. Genetica. 1998;102-103(1-6):61–69. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Navarro-Sabaté A., Aguadé M., Segarra C. The relationship between allozyme and chromosomal polymorphism inferred from nucleotide variation at the Acph-1 gene region of Drosophila subobscura. Genetics. 1999 Oct;153(2):871–889. doi: 10.1093/genetics/153.2.871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Nielsen R., Weinreich D. M. The age of nonsynonymous and synonymous mutations in animal mtDNA and implications for the mildly deleterious theory. Genetics. 1999 Sep;153(1):497–506. doi: 10.1093/genetics/153.1.497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Ota T., Kimura M. On the constancy of the evolutionary rate of cistrons. J Mol Evol. 1971;1(1):18–25. doi: 10.1007/BF01659391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Parsons T. J., Muniec D. S., Sullivan K., Woodyatt N., Alliston-Greiner R., Wilson M. R., Berry D. L., Holland K. A., Weedn V. W., Gill P. A high observed substitution rate in the human mitochondrial DNA control region. Nat Genet. 1997 Apr;15(4):363–368. doi: 10.1038/ng0497-363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Purugganan M. D., Suddith J. I. Molecular population genetics of floral homeotic loci. Departures from the equilibrium-neutral model at the APETALA3 and PISTILLATA genes of Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics. 1999 Feb;151(2):839–848. doi: 10.1093/genetics/151.2.839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Purugganan M. D., Suddith J. I. Molecular population genetics of the Arabidopsis CAULIFLOWER regulatory gene: nonneutral evolution and naturally occurring variation in floral homeotic function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Jul 7;95(14):8130–8134. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.14.8130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Ramos-Onsins S., Aguadé M. Molecular evolution of the Cecropin multigene family in Drosophila. functional genes vs. pseudogenes. Genetics. 1998 Sep;150(1):157–171. doi: 10.1093/genetics/150.1.157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Rand D. M., Dorfsman M., Kann L. M. Neutral and non-neutral evolution of Drosophila mitochondrial DNA. Genetics. 1994 Nov;138(3):741–756. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.3.741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Rand D. M., Kann L. M. Excess amino acid polymorphism in mitochondrial DNA: contrasts among genes from Drosophila, mice, and humans. Mol Biol Evol. 1996 Jul;13(6):735–748. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Rand D. M., Kann L. M. Mutation and selection at silent and replacement sites in the evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA. Genetica. 1998;102-103(1-6):393–407. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Schaeffer S. W., Miller E. L. Molecular population genetics of an electrophoretically monomorphic protein in the alcohol dehydrogenase region of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics. 1992 Sep;132(1):163–178. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.1.163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Schmid K. J., Nigro L., Aquadro C. F., Tautz D. Large number of replacement polymorphisms in rapidly evolving genes of Drosophila. Implications for genome-wide surveys of DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 1999 Dec;153(4):1717–1729. doi: 10.1093/genetics/153.4.1717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Schug M. D., Hutter C. M., Noor M. A., Aquadro C. F. Mutation and evolution of microsatellites in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetica. 1998;102-103(1-6):359–367. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Segarra C., Ribó G., Aguadé M. Differentiation of Muller's chromosomal elements D and E in the obscura group of Drosophila. Genetics. 1996 Sep;144(1):139–146. doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.1.139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Smith J. M. Estimating selection by comparing synonymous and substitutional changes. J Mol Evol. 1994 Aug;39(2):123–128. doi: 10.1007/BF00163800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Tajima F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 1989 Nov;123(3):585–595. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.3.585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Takahata N. Allelic genealogy and human evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 1993 Jan;10(1):2–22. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a039995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Templeton A. R. Contingency tests of neutrality using intra/interspecific gene trees: the rejection of neutrality for the evolution of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase II gene in the hominoid primates. Genetics. 1996 Nov;144(3):1263–1270. doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.3.1263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Tsaur S. C., Ting C. T., Wu C. I. Positive selection driving the evolution of a gene of male reproduction, Acp26Aa, of Drosophila: II. Divergence versus polymorphism. Mol Biol Evol. 1998 Aug;15(8):1040–1046. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. VUKSIC L., MORELJ M., ARSIC B., MEL D. Neka pitanja epidemiologije pegavca sa terena u sand6zaku, Bosni i Hercegovini 1951-1952 godine. Vojnosanit Pregl. 1953 Jan-Feb;10(1-2):23–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Watterson G. A. On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination. Theor Popul Biol. 1975 Apr;7(2):256–276. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(75)90020-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Wayne M. L., Contamine D., Kreitman M. Molecular population genetics of ref(2)P, a locus which confers viral resistance in Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol. 1996 Jan;13(1):191–199. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Wayne M. L., Kreitman M. Reduced variation at concertina, a heterochromatic locus in Drosophila. Genet Res. 1996 Oct;68(2):101–108. doi: 10.1017/s001667230003398x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Zurovcova M., Eanes W. F. Lack of nucleotide polymorphism in the Y-linked sperm flagellar dynein gene Dhc-Yh3 of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Genetics. 1999 Dec;153(4):1709–1715. doi: 10.1093/genetics/153.4.1709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES