Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1999 Sep;153(1):289–303. doi: 10.1093/genetics/153.1.289

Soma-to-germline interactions during Drosophila oogenesis are influenced by dose-sensitive interactions between cut and the genes cappuccino, ovarian tumor and agnostic.

S M Jackson 1, C A Berg 1
PMCID: PMC1460760  PMID: 10471713

Abstract

The cut gene of Drosophila melanogaster encodes a homeodomain protein that regulates a soma-to-germline signaling pathway required for proper morphology of germline cells during oogenesis. cut is required solely in somatic follicle cells, and when cut function is disrupted, membranes separating adjacent nurse cells break down and the structural integrity of the actin cytoskeleton is compromised. To understand the mechanism by which cut expression influences germline cell morphology, we determined whether binucleate cells form by defective cytokinesis or by fusion of adjacent cells. Egg chambers produced by cut, cappuccino, and chickadee mutants contained binucleate cells in which ring canal remnants stained with antibodies against Hu-li tai shao and Kelch, two proteins that are added to ring canals after cytokinesis is complete. In addition, defects in egg chamber morphology were observed only in middle to late stages of oogenesis, suggesting that germline cell cytokineses were normal in these mutants. cut exhibited dose-sensitive genetic interactions with cappuccino but not with chickadee or other genes that regulate cytoskeletal function, including armadillo, spaghetti squash, quail, spire, Src64B, and Tec29A. Genomic regions containing genes that cooperate with cut were identified by performing a second-site noncomplementing screen using a collection of chromosomal deficiencies. Sixteen regions that interact with cut during oogenesis and eight regions that interact during the development of other tissues were identified. Genetic interactions between cut and the ovarian tumor gene were identified as a result of the screen. In addition, the gene agnostic was found to be required during oogenesis, and genetic interactions between cut and agnostic were revealed. These results demonstrate that a signaling pathway regulating the morphology of germline cells is sensitive to genetic doses of cut and the genes cappuccino, ovarian tumor, and agnostic. Since these genes regulate cytoskeletal function and cAMP metabolism, the cut-mediated pathway functionally links these elements to preserve the cytoarchitecture of the germline cells.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (455.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aceves-Piña E. O., Booker R., Duerr J. S., Livingstone M. S., Quinn W. G., Smith R. F., Sziber P. P., Tempel B. L., Tully T. P. Learning and memory in Drosophila, studied with mutants. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1983;48(Pt 2):831–840. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1983.048.01.086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Balasubramanian M. K., Hirani B. R., Burke J. D., Gould K. L. The Schizosaccharomyces pombe cdc3+ gene encodes a profilin essential for cytokinesis. J Cell Biol. 1994 Jun;125(6):1289–1301. doi: 10.1083/jcb.125.6.1289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bellen H. J., Gregory B. K., Olsson C. L., Kiger J. A., Jr Two Drosophila learning mutants, dunce and rutabaga, provide evidence of a maternal role for cAMP on embryogenesis. Dev Biol. 1987 Jun;121(2):432–444. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(87)90180-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bender L. B., Kooh P. J., Muskavitch M. A. Complex function and expression of Delta during Drosophila oogenesis. Genetics. 1993 Apr;133(4):967–978. doi: 10.1093/genetics/133.4.967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Blochlinger K., Bodmer R., Jack J., Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N. Primary structure and expression of a product from cut, a locus involved in specifying sensory organ identity in Drosophila. Nature. 1988 Jun 16;333(6174):629–635. doi: 10.1038/333629a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Blochlinger K., Bodmer R., Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N. Patterns of expression of cut, a protein required for external sensory organ development in wild-type and cut mutant Drosophila embryos. Genes Dev. 1990 Aug;4(8):1322–1331. doi: 10.1101/gad.4.8.1322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Blochlinger K., Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N. Postembryonic patterns of expression of cut, a locus regulating sensory organ identity in Drosophila. Development. 1993 Feb;117(2):441–450. doi: 10.1242/dev.117.2.441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Blochlinger K., Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N. Transformation of sensory organ identity by ectopic expression of Cut in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 1991 Jul;5(7):1124–1135. doi: 10.1101/gad.5.7.1124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bodmer R., Barbel S., Sheperd S., Jack J. W., Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N. Transformation of sensory organs by mutations of the cut locus of D. melanogaster. Cell. 1987 Oct 23;51(2):293–307. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90156-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Castrillon D. H., Wasserman S. A. Diaphanous is required for cytokinesis in Drosophila and shares domains of similarity with the products of the limb deformity gene. Development. 1994 Dec;120(12):3367–3377. doi: 10.1242/dev.120.12.3367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cummings C. A., Cronmiller C. The daughterless gene functions together with Notch and Delta in the control of ovarian follicle development in Drosophila. Development. 1994 Feb;120(2):381–394. doi: 10.1242/dev.120.2.381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dodson G. S., Guarnieri D. J., Simon M. A. Src64 is required for ovarian ring canal morphogenesis during Drosophila oogenesis. Development. 1998 Aug;125(15):2883–2892. doi: 10.1242/dev.125.15.2883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dudai Y., Jan Y. N., Byers D., Quinn W. G., Benzer S. dunce, a mutant of Drosophila deficient in learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 May;73(5):1684–1688. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.5.1684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Edwards K. A., Kiehart D. P. Drosophila nonmuscle myosin II has multiple essential roles in imaginal disc and egg chamber morphogenesis. Development. 1996 May;122(5):1499–1511. doi: 10.1242/dev.122.5.1499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Emmons S., Phan H., Calley J., Chen W., James B., Manseau L. Cappuccino, a Drosophila maternal effect gene required for polarity of the egg and embryo, is related to the vertebrate limb deformity locus. Genes Dev. 1995 Oct 15;9(20):2482–2494. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.20.2482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Evangelista M., Blundell K., Longtine M. S., Chow C. J., Adames N., Pringle J. R., Peter M., Boone C. Bni1p, a yeast formin linking cdc42p and the actin cytoskeleton during polarized morphogenesis. Science. 1997 Apr 4;276(5309):118–122. doi: 10.1126/science.276.5309.118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Fehon R. G., Oren T., LaJeunesse D. R., Melby T. E., McCartney B. M. Isolation of mutations in the Drosophila homologues of the human Neurofibromatosis 2 and yeast CDC42 genes using a simple and efficient reverse-genetic method. Genetics. 1997 May;146(1):245–252. doi: 10.1093/genetics/146.1.245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Giansanti M. G., Bonaccorsi S., Williams B., Williams E. V., Santolamazza C., Goldberg M. L., Gatti M. Cooperative interactions between the central spindle and the contractile ring during Drosophila cytokinesis. Genes Dev. 1998 Feb 1;12(3):396–410. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.3.396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Grammont M., Dastugue B., Couderc J. L. The Drosophila toucan (toc) gene is required in germline cells for the somatic cell patterning during oogenesis. Development. 1997 Dec;124(24):4917–4926. doi: 10.1242/dev.124.24.4917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Guarnieri D. J., Dodson G. S., Simon M. A. SRC64 regulates the localization of a Tec-family kinase required for Drosophila ring canal growth. Mol Cell. 1998 May;1(6):831–840. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80082-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Haugwitz M., Noegel A. A., Karakesisoglou J., Schleicher M. Dictyostelium amoebae that lack G-actin-sequestering profilins show defects in F-actin content, cytokinesis, and development. Cell. 1994 Oct 21;79(2):303–314. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90199-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Imamura H., Tanaka K., Hihara T., Umikawa M., Kamei T., Takahashi K., Sasaki T., Takai Y. Bni1p and Bnr1p: downstream targets of the Rho family small G-proteins which interact with profilin and regulate actin cytoskeleton in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 1997 May 15;16(10):2745–2755. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.10.2745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Jack J., DeLotto Y. Structure and regulation of a complex locus: the cut gene of Drosophila. Genetics. 1995 Apr;139(4):1689–1700. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.4.1689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Jack J., Dorsett D., Delotto Y., Liu S. Expression of the cut locus in the Drosophila wing margin is required for cell type specification and is regulated by a distant enhancer. Development. 1991 Nov;113(3):735–747. doi: 10.1242/dev.113.3.735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. King R. C., Mohler D., Riley S. F., Storto P. D., Nicolazzo P. S. Complementation between alleles at the ovarian tumor locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Dev Genet. 1986;7(1):1–20. doi: 10.1002/dvg.1020070102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. King R. C., Storto P. D. The role of the otu gene in Drosophila oogenesis. Bioessays. 1988 Jan;8(1):18–24. doi: 10.1002/bies.950080106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lane M. E., Kalderon D. Genetic investigation of cAMP-dependent protein kinase function in Drosophila development. Genes Dev. 1993 Jul;7(7A):1229–1243. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.7a.1229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lane M. E., Kalderon D. Localization and functions of protein kinase A during Drosophila oogenesis. Mech Dev. 1995 Feb;49(3):191–200. doi: 10.1016/0925-4773(94)00317-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Levin L. R., Han P. L., Hwang P. M., Feinstein P. G., Davis R. L., Reed R. R. The Drosophila learning and memory gene rutabaga encodes a Ca2+/Calmodulin-responsive adenylyl cyclase. Cell. 1992 Feb 7;68(3):479–489. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90185-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Mahajan-Miklos S., Cooley L. The villin-like protein encoded by the Drosophila quail gene is required for actin bundle assembly during oogenesis. Cell. 1994 Jul 29;78(2):291–301. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90298-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Majumdar A., Nagaraj R., Banerjee U. strawberry notch encodes a conserved nuclear protein that functions downstream of Notch and regulates gene expression along the developing wing margin of Drosophila. Genes Dev. 1997 May 15;11(10):1341–1353. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.10.1341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Manseau L., Calley J., Phan H. Profilin is required for posterior patterning of the Drosophila oocyte. Development. 1996 Jul;122(7):2109–2116. doi: 10.1242/dev.122.7.2109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Micchelli C. A., Rulifson E. J., Blair S. S. The function and regulation of cut expression on the wing margin of Drosophila: Notch, Wingless and a dominant negative role for Delta and Serrate. Development. 1997 Apr;124(8):1485–1495. doi: 10.1242/dev.124.8.1485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Morcillo P., Rosen C., Dorsett D. Genes regulating the remote wing margin enhancer in the Drosophila cut locus. Genetics. 1996 Nov;144(3):1143–1154. doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.3.1143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Murphy A. M., Montell D. J. Cell type-specific roles for Cdc42, Rac, and RhoL in Drosophila oogenesis. J Cell Biol. 1996 May;133(3):617–630. doi: 10.1083/jcb.133.3.617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Peifer M., Orsulic S., Sweeton D., Wieschaus E. A role for the Drosophila segment polarity gene armadillo in cell adhesion and cytoskeletal integrity during oogenesis. Development. 1993 Aug;118(4):1191–1207. doi: 10.1242/dev.118.4.1191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Ray R. P., Schüpbach T. Intercellular signaling and the polarization of body axes during Drosophila oogenesis. Genes Dev. 1996 Jul 15;10(14):1711–1723. doi: 10.1101/gad.10.14.1711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Robinson D. N., Cant K., Cooley L. Morphogenesis of Drosophila ovarian ring canals. Development. 1994 Jul;120(7):2015–2025. doi: 10.1242/dev.120.7.2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Robinson D. N., Smith-Leiker T. A., Sokol N. S., Hudson A. M., Cooley L. Formation of the Drosophila ovarian ring canal inner rim depends on cheerio. Genetics. 1997 Apr;145(4):1063–1072. doi: 10.1093/genetics/145.4.1063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Rodesch C., Pettus J., Nagoshi R. N. The Drosophila ovarian tumor gene is required for the organization of actin filaments during multiple stages in oogenesis. Dev Biol. 1997 Oct 15;190(2):153–164. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1997.8697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Roulier E. M., Panzer S., Beckendorf S. K. The Tec29 tyrosine kinase is required during Drosophila embryogenesis and interacts with Src64 in ring canal development. Mol Cell. 1998 May;1(6):819–829. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80081-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Ruohola H., Bremer K. A., Baker D., Swedlow J. R., Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N. Role of neurogenic genes in establishment of follicle cell fate and oocyte polarity during oogenesis in Drosophila. Cell. 1991 Aug 9;66(3):433–449. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90008-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Steinhauer W. R., Kalfayan L. J. A specific ovarian tumor protein isoform is required for efficient differentiation of germ cells in Drosophila oogenesis. Genes Dev. 1992 Feb;6(2):233–243. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.2.233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Tirronen M., Lahti V. P., Heino T. I., Roos C. Two otu transcripts are selectively localised in Drosophila oogenesis by a mechanism that requires a function of the otu protein. Mech Dev. 1995 Jul;52(1):65–75. doi: 10.1016/0925-4773(95)00390-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Verheyen E. M., Cooley L. Profilin mutations disrupt multiple actin-dependent processes during Drosophila development. Development. 1994 Apr;120(4):717–728. doi: 10.1242/dev.120.4.717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Vervoort M., Zink D., Pujol N., Victoir K., Dumont N., Ghysen A., Dambly-Chaudière C. Genetic determinants of sense organ identity in Drosophila: regulatory interactions between cut and poxn. Development. 1995 Sep;121(9):3111–3120. doi: 10.1242/dev.121.9.3111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Wayne S., Liggett K., Pettus J., Nagoshi R. N. Genetic characterization of small ovaries, a gene required in the soma for the development of the Drosophila ovary and the female germline. Genetics. 1995 Mar;139(3):1309–1320. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.3.1309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Wheatley S., Kulkarni S., Karess R. Drosophila nonmuscle myosin II is required for rapid cytoplasmic transport during oogenesis and for axial nuclear migration in early embryos. Development. 1995 Jun;121(6):1937–1946. doi: 10.1242/dev.121.6.1937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Wieschaus E., Audit C., Masson M. A clonal analysis of the roles of somatic cells and germ line during oogenesis in Drosophila. Dev Biol. 1981 Nov;88(1):92–103. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(81)90221-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Xu T., Caron L. A., Fehon R. G., Artavanis-Tsakonas S. The involvement of the Notch locus in Drosophila oogenesis. Development. 1992 Aug;115(4):913–922. doi: 10.1242/dev.115.4.913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES