. 2006 Mar;172(3):1783–1797. doi: 10.1534/genetics.104.039313

TABLE 7.

Detection and mapping of an epistatic QTL in 1000 animals

	Power to detect QTL			Mean location error (cM)
Strategy	0 RILs	500 RILs	1000 RILs	0 RILs	500 RILs	1000 RILs
cc^a	—	0.29	0.54	—	1.72	1.34
cc04	—	0.25	0.47	—	1.34	1.07
cc08	—	0.18	0.40	—	0.98	0.82
cctop10	—	0.28	0.55	—	1.92	1.27
riail08	—	0.49	0.61	—	1.98	1.49
riail13	—	0.37	0.46	—	2.10	1.89
rihs05	—	0.11	0.09	—	3.01	2.25
rihs10	—	0.06	0.02	—	6.82	9.71
rihs30	—	0.00	0.01	—	—	2.13
BC	0.84	—	—	4.99	—	—
BC (SMA)	0.92	—	—	2.36	—	—
F₂	0.60	—	—	4.78	—	—
F₂ (SMA)	0.78	—	—	3.05	—	—

Tabulation of data in Figure 7 is shown. See Figure 7 legend and results for details.

Additional simulations were performed for cc with results [written as number of RILs = power (location error)]: 100 RILs = 0.02 (8.16), 200 RILs = 0.05 (3.20), 250 RILs = 0.12 (3.07), 333 RILs = 0.19 (2.80).