Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1970 Nov;210(4):823–838. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009244

Alterations of synaptic action in chromatolysed motoneurones of the cat

M Kuno, R Llinás
PMCID: PMC1395626  PMID: 4322767

Abstract

1. Monosynaptic EPSPs in lumbosacral motoneurones undergoing chromatolysis were studied by intracellular recording from 7 to 20 days after section of the appropriate ventral roots of the cat.

2. The maximum monosynaptic EPSPs evoked in chromatolysed motoneurones by afferent volleys from the biceps-semitendinosus or the triceps surae muscles ranged from 1·0 to 9·5 mV in amplitude. The time-to-peak of these EPSPs was 1·7 msec on the average. These values were significantly smaller and longer, respectively, than the amplitude and the time-to-peak of monosynaptic EPSPs observed in normal motoneurones. The long time-to-peak of EPSPs in chromatolysed motoneurones could not be accounted for by asynchronous transmitter release.

3. The mean number of unit EPSPs responding to a single afferent impulse (m) in chromatolysed motoneurones was comparable to that found in normal motoneurones.

4. The amplitude of unit EPSPs estimated from the mean EPSP amplitude and the m value following stimulation of a single afferent fibre was significantly smaller in chromatolysed motoneurones than in normal motoneurones. This difference was attributed to a difference in synaptic location.

5. The shape of monosynaptic EPSPs evoked in chromatolysed motoneurones by stimulation of single afferent fibres was analysed on the basis of Rall's compartment model. The analysis suggested that there is a lack of the excitatory synaptic input to the cell body in chromatolysed motoneurones.

6. Similar alterations were also found in IPSPs. The degree of change in synaptic responses evoked by stimulation of various pathways appears to depend on the synaptic location.

7. Following the study of the interaction of several inputs on the motoneurone and of their dependence on membrane potential, a tentative model of the synaptic distribution of different pathways is proposed.

Full text

PDF
823

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BROCK L. G., COOMBS J. S., ECCLES J. C. The recording of potentials from motoneurones with an intracellular electrode. J Physiol. 1952 Aug;117(4):431–460. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1952.sp004759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BROWN G. L., PASCOE J. E. The effect of degenerative section of ganglionic axons on transmission through the ganglion. J Physiol. 1954 Mar 29;123(3):565–573. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blinzinger K., Kreutzberg G. Displacement of synaptic terminals from regenerating motoneurons by microglial cells. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1968;85(2):145–157. doi: 10.1007/BF00325030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Burke R. E. Composite nature of the monosynaptic excitatory postsynaptic potential. J Neurophysiol. 1967 Sep;30(5):1114–1137. doi: 10.1152/jn.1967.30.5.1114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. COOMBS J. S., ECCLES J. C., FATT P. The specific ionic conductances and the ionic movements across the motoneuronal membrane that produce the inhibitory post-synaptic potential. J Physiol. 1955 Nov 28;130(2):326–374. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1955.sp005412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. DEL CASTILLO J., KATZ B. Quantal components of the end-plate potential. J Physiol. 1954 Jun 28;124(3):560–573. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Decima E. E., Goldberg L. J. Antidromic firing of primary afferent fibers induced by motoneuron activation. Bull Los Angeles Neurol Soc. 1969 Jan;34(1):67–69. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. ECCLES J. C., FATT P., KOKETSU K. Cholinergic and inhibitory synapses in a pathway from motor-axon collaterals to motoneurones. J Physiol. 1954 Dec 10;126(3):524–562. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. ECCLES J. C., LIBET B., YOUNG R. R. The behaviour of chromatolysed motoneurones studied by intracellular recording. J Physiol. 1958 Aug 29;143(1):11–40. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp006041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hunt C. C., Riker W. K. Properties of frog sympathetic neurons in normal ganglia and after axon section. J Neurophysiol. 1966 Nov;29(6):1096–1114. doi: 10.1152/jn.1966.29.6.1096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. KATZ B., MILEDI R. A STUDY OF SPONTANEOUS MINIATURE POTENTIALS IN SPINAL MOTONEURONES. J Physiol. 1963 Sep;168:389–422. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1963.sp007199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. KATZ B., MILEDI R. THE MEASUREMENT OF SYNAPTIC DELAY, AND THE TIME COURSE OF ACETYLCHOLINE RELEASE AT THE NEUROMUSCULAR JUNCTION. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1965 Feb 16;161:483–495. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1965.0016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. KATZ B., THESLEFF S. On the factors which determine the amplitude of the miniature end-plate potential. J Physiol. 1957 Jul 11;137(2):267–278. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1957.sp005811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. KUNO M. QUANTAL COMPONENTS OF EXCITATORY SYNAPTIC POTENTIALS IN SPINAL MOTONEURONES. J Physiol. 1964 Dec;175:81–99. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kuno M., Llinás R. Enhancement of synaptic transmission by dendritic potentials in chromatolysed motoneurones of the cat. J Physiol. 1970 Nov;210(4):807–821. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kuno M., Miyahara J. T. Analysis of synaptic efficacy in spinal motoneurones from 'quantum' aspects. J Physiol. 1969 Apr;201(2):479–493. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kuno M., Miyahara J. T. Non-linear summation of unit synaptic potentials in spinal motoneurones of the cat. J Physiol. 1969 Apr;201(2):465–477. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. LLINAS R., TERZUOLO C. A. MECHANISMS OF SUPRASPINAL ACTIONS UPON SPINAL CORD ACTIVITIES. RETICULAR INHIBITORY MECHANISMS UPON FLEXOR MOTONEURONS. J Neurophysiol. 1965 Mar;28:413–422. doi: 10.1152/jn.1965.28.2.413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. McINTYRE A. K., BRADLEY K., BROCK L. G. Responses of motoneurons undergoing chromatolysis. J Gen Physiol. 1959 May 20;42(5):931–958. doi: 10.1085/jgp.42.5.931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Nelson P. G., Frank K. Anomalous rectification in cat spinal motoneurons and effect of polarizing currents on excitatory postsynaptic potential. J Neurophysiol. 1967 Sep;30(5):1097–1113. doi: 10.1152/jn.1967.30.5.1097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. RALL W. Membrane potential transients and membrane time constant of motoneurons. Exp Neurol. 1960 Oct;2:503–532. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(60)90029-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Rall W., Burke R. E., Smith T. G., Nelson P. G., Frank K. Dendritic location of synapses and possible mechanisms for the monosynaptic EPSP in motoneurons. J Neurophysiol. 1967 Sep;30(5):1169–1193. doi: 10.1152/jn.1967.30.5.1169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Shapovalov A. I., Grantyn' A. A. Nadsegmentarnye sinapticheskie vliianiia na khromatolizirovannye motoneirony. Biofizika. 1968 Mar-Apr;13(2):260–269. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Smith T. G., Wuerker R. B., Frank K. Membrane impedance changes during synaptic transmission in cat spinal motoneurons. J Neurophysiol. 1967 Sep;30(5):1072–1096. doi: 10.1152/jn.1967.30.5.1072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES