Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2026 Sep 11;481(10):5397–5418. doi: 10.1007/s11010-026-05723-7

Nutrient deprivation enhances the cytotoxic effects of a sulfonamide-chalcone hybrid in PC-3 prostate cancer cells

Gisele Santos de Araújo 1, Rodrigo Elísio de Sá 1, Stéphanie Aguiar de Negreiros Matos Silva 1, Fabrício dos Santos Machado 1, Caridad Noda Perez 2, Mirian Rita Carrilho de Castro 2, Anali Del Milagro Bernabe Garnique 3, Bruna Oliveira de Almeida 3, Keli Lima 3, João Agostinho Machado Neto 3, Letícia Veras Costa Lotufo 3, José Delano Barreto Marinho Filho 1, Ana Jérsia Araujo 1,✉
PMCID: PMC13687340  PMID: 42726371

Abstract

Hybrid molecules integrating different pharmacophoric motifs have emerged as a promising strategy in anticancer drug discovery. In this study, we report for the first time the biological effects of a sulfonamide-chalcone hybrid in the PC-3 prostate cancer cell line under standard culture conditions and nutrient deprivation. The molecular design of SSC185 (µ-(2,5-dichloro-N-{4-[(3E)-4-(3-nitrophenyl)buta-1,3-dien-2-yl]phenyl}benzenesulfonamide) incorporates an α,β-unsaturated system conjugated to the chalcone scaffold together with a sulfonamide moiety, structural features frequently associated with modulation of cancer-related signaling pathways. Results demonstrated that SSC185 reduced the MTT signal of PC-3 cells in a concentration- and time-dependent manner, with IC₅₀ values of 24.69 µM at 24 h and 18.9 µM at 72 h, and exhibited enhanced activity under serum-deprived conditions, with an IC₅₀ of 4.20 µM. Complementary studies employing pharmacological modulators of autophagy, apoptosis, redox status, and proteostasis were conducted to further characterize the compound’s activity. SSC185 increased SQSTM1/p62 and LC3B-I levels without detectable changes in LC3B-II levels or increased acidic vesicle formation, accompanied by reduced AKT/RPS6 signaling and mitochondrial dysfunction. These molecular alterations were associated with the cellular response to SSC185, while nutrient deprivation markedly enhanced its activity in PC-3 cells, indicating that the cellular nutritional context influences the response to the compound.

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name 11010_2026_5723_Figa_HTML.webp

Keywords: Androgen-resistant prostate cancer, Nutrient-deprived, Sulfonamide-chalcone hybrid, Metabolic stress

Introduction

Identifying relationships between the structural characteristics of small molecules and their biological effects is a cornerstone of modern medicinal chemistry [1]. Therefore, understanding chemical and physicochemical properties influences the interaction of compounds with cellular targets, guiding the development of molecules with greater efficacy and biological selectivity [2]. Among the promising approaches, molecular hybridization has proven to be an established medicinal chemistry strategy that aims to combine two molecules into a new and unique chemical entity, capable of acting through different modes of action and targeting multiple targets simultaneously, resulting in greater therapeutic efficacy and a lower propensity for resistance [3, 4]. In this context, sulfonamide-chalcone hybrids have emerged as attractive scaffolds owing to the combination of complementary pharmacophoric features [5–9]. The α,β-unsaturated system of chalcones can act as an electrophilic center capable of interacting with nucleophilic residues in proteins [10–12], whereas the sulfonamide moiety contributes physicochemical and interaction properties favorable to molecular recognition by biological targets [13–15].

In cancer cells, adaptation to unfavorable conditions involves coordinated regulation of growth signaling, proteostasis, and cellular stress responses, which contribute to survival under conditions such as limited nutrient availability and hypoxia [16–18]. These processes are particularly relevant in advanced prostate cancer, in which tumor cells can maintain proliferation and survival despite adverse environmental conditions [19, 20]. Among the signaling networks involved in these responses, the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway integrates growth and nutrient-derived signals and regulates downstream effectors, including RPS6, involved in protein synthesis and cellular growth [21–23]. Beyond growth-related signaling, cellular adaptation to stress also requires mechanisms that maintain protein homeostasis through coordinated protein synthesis, turnover, and degradation [24, 25]. Accordingly, cellular proteostasis involves stress-response mechanisms, including autophagy-related processes in which LC3 and the multifunctional adaptor SQSTM1/p62 participate [26, 27]. Changes in these processes may also involve vesicular compartments, providing complementary information on cellular responses to stress [28]. In addition, nutrient availability can influence redox balance and mitochondrial function, thereby affecting tumor cell responses to pharmacological treatment [29, 30]. Thus, evaluating SSC185 under standard and nutrient-deprived conditions may help determine how the nutritional context influences its cellular effects.

SSC185 (µ-(2,5-dichloro-N-{4-[(3E)−4-(3-nitrophenyl)buta-1,3-dien-2-yl]phenyl}benzenesulfonamide) is a sulfonamide-chalcone hybrid synthesized via Claisen-Schmidt condensation and contains an α,β-unsaturated system with potential electrophilic reactivity (Fig. 1a). Previous studies have demonstrated biological activity of SSC185 in different tumor models, including alterations in cell-cycle progression and concentration-dependent apoptosis or necroptosis in SW-620 metastatic lymph node-derived colorectal cancer cells [31], as well as inhibiting adhesion and migration in B16-F10 murine melanoma metastatic cells [32]. These findings prompted further investigation of the cellular effects of SSC185 in other aggressive cancer models. PC-3 cells represent an androgen-independent prostate cancer model characterized by aggressive behavior and alterations in survival signaling pathways, including the PI3K/AKT/mTOR axis, providing a suitable system for further characterization of the cellular responses associated with SSC185.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

SSC185 reduces the MTT signal and impairs the clonogenic potential of PC-3 cells. a Chemical structure of SSC185. b Cells were incubated with serial concentrations of SSC185 (up to 100 µM) for 72 h, and the MTT signal was determined. c Dose-response curve after intermittent exposure (3, 6, 12, and 24 h) to SSC185, evaluated by the MTT assay. d The bar graph shows the exposure time to SSC185 (dark gray bar) and the incubation time in compound-free medium (light gray bar), and the IC50 values are also shown. (e and f) Graph of the percentage of colony area of PC-3 cells after 6 h and 24 h of exposure to SSC185 at different concentrations (4.8, 9.5, 19, 38, and 76 µM). Data were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test. The data are representative of three independent experiments. Bars, S.E.M. ***p < 0.001

Initial morphological observations of SSC185-treated PC-3 cells revealed cytoplasmic vacuolization, which prompted further investigation of acidic vesicular compartments and autophagy-related proteins, including LC3B and SQSTM1/p62. Based on these observations and on the cellular processes involved in stress adaptation described above, the present study characterized the effects of SSC185 in PC-3 cells under standard culture conditions and nutrient deprivation. Complementary analyses included cell-cycle distribution, clonogenic capacity, cellular integrity, autophagy-related markers and acidic vesicular compartments, AKT/RPS6 signaling, mitochondrial membrane potential, and responses to pharmacological modulators. This approach allowed the cellular effects of SSC185 to be examined across processes related to proliferative signaling, proteostasis, vesicular organization, mitochondrial function, and nutrient availability.

Materials and methods

Reagents and chemicals

SSC185 was synthesized by Claisen-Schmidt condensation at the Chemical Institute, Federal University of Goiás (UFG), Goiânia, Brazil. Its structure was elucidated through high-resolution mass spectroscopy and nuclear magnetic resonance (1H and 13C NMR), as previously reported by [31, 32]. Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)−2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) were obtained from Exodo científica (Sumaré, SP, Brazil). The Panoptic staining kit was obtained from Laborclin® (Pinhais, PR, Brazil). Neutral red was obtained from Inlab (São Paulo, SP, Brazil). Primary antibodies against phosphorylated PARP1 (#9542, RRID: AB_2160739), phospho-AKT (#4060, RRID: AB_2315049), AKT (#4691, RRID: AB_915783), phospho-RPS6 (#4858, RRID: AB_916156), RPS6 (#2217, RRID: AB_331355), phospho-4E-BP1 (#9455, RRID: AB_560835), 4E-BP1 (#9452, RRID: AB_331692), phospho-ERK1/2 (#9101, RRID: AB_331646), ERK1/2 (#9102, RRID: AB_330744), SQSTM1/p62 (#88588, RRID: AB_2800197), LC3B I/II (#2775, RRID: AB_915950), α-tubulin (#2144, RRID: AB_2210548), and GAPDH (#2118, RRID: AB_561053) were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA). Secondary anti-rabbit (#7074, RRID: AB_2099233) and anti-mouse (#7076, RRID: AB_330924) antibodies conjugated with horseradish peroxidase were also obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA). Chloroquine (CQ), pan-caspase inhibitor Quinoline-Val-Asp-Difluorophenoxymethylketone (Q-VD-OPh), cycloheximide (CHX), N-acetylcysteine (NAC), curcumin, L-cysteine, and DTNB were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). Propidium iodide and Rhodamine 123 were obtained from Invitrogen (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

Cell lines and culture

The PC-3 cell line (RRID: CVCL_0035), obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, CRL-1435), was maintained in RPMI 1640 medium (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Capricorn Scientific, Ebsdorfergrund, HE, Germany) and 1% penicillin (100 U/mL)-streptomycin (100 µg/mL) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO₂ at 37 °C. The deprivation of FBS induced nutrient deprivation of the PC-3 cell line for 24 h. Cells were seeded overnight, and the supplemented RPMI medium (FBS 10%) was removed. The cells were washed with Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and RPMI medium without supplementation was added 24 h before the assays.

MTT assay

Cell viability was assessed indirectly using the MTT reduction assay [33]. PC-3 cells were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 5 × 10³ cells/well and allowed to adhere for 24 h. The cells were then treated with increasing concentrations ranging from 0.02 to 100 µM of SSC185 as an initial screening to determine IC50 values at 72 h following [34]. After determining the IC50 value at 72 h, the 24 h time point was evaluated, with concentrations ranging from 1.6 to 100 µM, to assess the effects of compound exposure over time under standard culture conditions (with FBS) or serum deprivation, in which cells were deprived of FBS for 24 h before treatment. For the inhibition studies, cells were pretreated for 4 h with CQ, Q-VD-OPh, CHX, or NAC. After pretreatment, the inhibitors were removed, and the cells were exposed to the compound for 24 h, both under standard conditions and under serum deprivation conditions. Control groups treated only with inhibitors were included. At the end of exposure to the compound, MTT (0.5 mg/mL) was added, and the cells were incubated for 3 h at 37 °C. Formazan crystals were solubilized with DMSO, and absorbance reading was performed in a microplate reader (Spectramax 190, Molecular devices, CA, USA) at 595 nm.

Intermittent exposure assay

For intermittent SSC185 exposure, the MTT assay was used. The assay was conducted as described previously [35]. PC-3 cells (5 × 10³ cells/well) were seeded in a 96-well plate. Cells were exposed to SSC185 (1.6 to 100 µM) for 3, 6, 12, or 24 h. After each predetermined time point, the medium containing SSC185 was removed, and the wells were washed with PBS, followed by incubation in compound-free media for 72 h. The MTT solution (0.5 mg/mL) was added to each well and incubated for 3 h. The MTT-formazan product dissolved in DMSO was quantified by measuring absorbance at 595 nm using a microplate reader Spectramax 190 (Molecular devices, CA, USA).

Colony formation assay

The clonogenic assay was conducted as described previously [34]. 500 cells per well of the PC-3 cell line were seeded in sterile 6-well plates. Concentrations of 4.8, 9.5, 19, 38, and 76 µM of SSC185 were added to the corresponding wells for 6 and 24 h. After the designated time, the cells were washed with PBS, and the medium was promptly replaced with compound-free RPMI for 8 days. The cells were then washed with PBS and stained with a solution of methanol and 1% crystal violet for 5 min. Images were acquired using the G: BOX Chemi XRQ (Syngene, Cambridge, UK) and analyzed using the “ColonyArea” plugin in ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).

Cell morphology analysis

Cell morphology was assessed by optical microscopy. PC-3 cells were seeded at a density of 0.5 × 105 cells per well in 24-well plates and allowed to adhere for 24 h. The cells were then treated with SSC185 at concentrations of 19 and 38 µM, using CQ (100 µM) as a control. After 6 h of exposure, the cells were either examined directly by optical microscopy or stained with the Panoptic rapid kit [9] or Neutral Red (40 µg/mL) [36], as previously described, to visualize morphological changes and intracellular vacuolization. Images were acquired using a Zeiss Primovert inverted microscope (Oberkochen, BW, DE) equipped with a 200× total magnification objective.

Cell cycle distribution and plasma membrane integrity analysis

Cell cycle and plasma membrane integrity analysis was performed by flow cytometry with propidium iodide (PI) DNA labeling following [37]. PC-3 cells were seeded in 12-well plates at a density of 1 × 10⁵ cells per well. Cells were exposed to SSC185 (19 µM and 38 µM) under standard conditions for 6 and 24 h or (4 µM) under starvation conditions for 24 h. The pellets were resuspended in 1 mL of PBS. A 200 µL aliquot of the cell suspension, both exposed and unexposed to the compound, was incubated with 200 µL of lysis solution (0.1% sodium citrate, 0.1% Triton X-100, and 2 µg/mL PI in PBS) for 30 min in the dark to analyze the distribution of DNA content. For the analysis of plasma membrane integrity, PC-3 cells were collected, washed with PBS, and incubated with PI at a final concentration of 25 µg/mL for 10 min at room temperature, protected from light. After incubation, the samples were analyzed immediately. Cells were considered PI-negative when they exhibited preserved plasma membrane integrity. Analyses were performed using a CytoFLEX cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) and the data were analyzed using FlowJo v.X.0.7 software (Treestar, Inc., San Carlos, CA, USA).

Mitochondrial depolarization analysis

Mitochondrial depolarization analysis was performed by flow cytometry using Rhodamine 123 (Rhd 123), as described previously [38]. Briefly, PC-3 cells were seeded in 12-well plates at a density of 1 × 10⁵ cells per well. Cells were exposed to SSC185 (19 µM and 38 µM) under standard conditions for 6 and 24 h or (4 µM) under starvation conditions for 24 h. The pellets were resuspended in 1 mL of PBS. A 500 µL aliquot of cell suspensions exposed and unexposed to the compound was centrifuged in PBS for staining. Staining was performed with Rhd 123 added to the cell suspension at a final concentration of 1 µM. Samples were incubated for 15 min in the cold, protected from light. After incubation, the cells were washed with cold 1× PBS and centrifuged (2,000 rpm/5 minutes) to remove excess dye and resuspended in 500 µL of PBS for acquisition. The acquisition was performed using a CytoFLEX cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA), and the data were analyzed using the FlowJo software v.X.0.7 (Treestar, Inc., San Carlos, CA, USA).

Acidic vesicular organelles (AVOs) stained by acridine orange

The assessment of acidic vesicular organelles was performed as previously described [39]. PC-3 cells were seeded in 24-well plates at a density of 1 × 10⁵ cells per well. Cells were exposed to SSC185 (19 µM and 38 µM) under standard conditions for 24 h or (4 µM) under nutrient deprivation conditions for 24 h. Cells were washed with PBS and incubated with a solution containing 0.1 µg/mL acridine orange (AO) (Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS for 15 min. After staining, cells were analyzed using GFP and RFP channels on a Lionheart FX automated fluorescence microscope (Agilent BioTek Instruments Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) at 200× magnification.

Western blotting

Protein expression was analyzed by Western blotting, as described previously [40]. Total protein extraction from PC-3 prostate cancer cells was performed using a buffer containing 100 mM Tris (pH 7.6), 1% Triton X-100, 2 mM PMSF, 10 mM Na3VO4, 100 mM NaF, 10 mM Na4P2O7, and 4 mM EDTA, from cells with or without exposure to SSC185 (9, 5, 19, and 38 µM) for 24 h. The extracted proteins were quantified using the Bradford method. After sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) (30 µg), the proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) and detected by incubating the membranes with specific primary antibodies and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies. Protein bands were detected using the SuperSignalWest Dura Extended Duration substrate system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and a G: BOX Chemi XX6 gel documentation system (Syngene). Protein bands were normalized relative to tubulin or GAPDH.

Thiol reactivity assay

The thiol reactivity of SSC185 was evaluated using L-cysteine and the DTNB/Ellman reagent, as previously described [41], with minor modifications. SSC185 or curcumin (25 or 50 µM) was incubated with L-cysteine (250 µM) in 50 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, at room temperature, in 96-well plates, for 0, 5, 10, 15, 30, 60, and 120 min. After each incubation period, DTNB was added to a final concentration of 500 µM, and the mixture was incubated for 5 to 10 min, protected from light. Absorbance was measured at 405 nm using a microplate reader (DR-200BN-BI, Kasuaki, Brazil distributor).

Wells containing only L-cysteine were used as free thiol controls with their respective incubation times, while wells containing phosphate buffer and DTNB were used for background signal correction. Additional wells containing SSC185 or curcumin, in the absence of L-cysteine, were included to correct for the intrinsic absorbance of the compound. Curcumin was used as an electrophilic reference compound. The remaining free L-cysteine was expressed as a percentage relative to the corresponding L-cysteine control, according to the following equation:

graphic file with name d33e448.gif

Statistical analysis

The statistical studies were performed using GraphPad Prism (Institutive Software for Science, San Diego, California, USA). MTT signal was expressed as a percentage of untreated controls, and IC₅₀ values were obtained by non-linear regression. The data were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test. Data are representative of three independent experiments. Bars, Standard Error Mean (S.E.M.); *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

Results

SSC185 reduces the MTT signal and clonogenic capacity of PC-3 cells in a time- and concentration-dependent manner

To investigate the biological effects of SSC185 in androgen-independent PC-3 prostate cancer cells, we first evaluated its effects using the MTT reduction assay. SSC185 reduced the MTT signal with an IC₅₀ of 19 µM after 72 h of continuous exposure (Fig. 1b). When PC-3 cells were treated for 24 h, SSC185 reduced the MTT signal in a concentration-dependent manner, with an IC₅₀ of 24.69 µM (Fig. 6a), indicating that the compound exerts a relevant effect in the first 24 h of exposure.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Prostate cancer cells respond differently to SSC185 under standard and nutrient-deprived conditions. a MTT dose-response curve obtained after 24 h of treatment with SSC185 at different concentrations, ranging from 1.6 to 100 µM. b MTT dose-response curves of SSC185 associated with 4 h pretreatment with CQ, QVD, CHX, and NAC. c MTT signal of cells exposed to the inhibitors alone was used as an intrinsic toxicity control. d Comparison of SSC185 IC₅₀ values after pretreatment with pharmacological inhibitors. Graphs a – d correspond to standard culture conditions. e MTT dose-response curve obtained after 24 h of treatment with SSC185 at different concentrations, ranging from 1.6 to 100 µM. f MTT dose-response curves of SSC185 associated with 4 h pretreatment with CQ, QVD, CHX, and NAC. g MTT signal of cells exposed to the inhibitors alone was used as an intrinsic toxicity control. h Comparison of IC₅₀ values of SSC185 cells after pretreatment with pharmacological inhibitors. Plots e – h correspond to nutrient deprivation conditions. Data were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test. Data are representative of three independent experiments. Bars, S.E.M; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. ## p < 0.001 compared to NAC. CQ: chloroquine; CHX: Cycloheximide; NAC: N-acetylcysteine; QVD: Q-VD-OPh

To further characterize the temporal dependence of SSC185 activity, an intermittent exposure assay was performed in which PC-3 cells were exposed to SSC185 for 3, 6, 12, or 24 h. The medium containing the compound was then replaced with compound-free medium until a total incubation time of 72 h was reached. The MTT signal was then quantified. Short exposure intervals of 3 and 6 h required markedly higher concentrations of SSC185 (IC₅₀ > 50 µM) to reduce the MTT signal (Fig. 1c, d). In contrast, exposures of 12 h and 24 h resulted in IC₅₀ values of 35.68 µM and 22.31 µM, respectively (Fig. 1c, d). These results indicate that the effect of SSC185 on MTT reduction depends on both exposure time and concentration, with longer exposure resulting in lower IC₅₀ values.

The long-term proliferative potential of PC-3 cells after transient exposure to SSC185 was evaluated using a clonogenic assay. Cells were treated with SSC185 (4.8, 9.5, 19, 38, and 76 µM) for 6–24 h, after which the medium was replaced with compound-free medium and colonies were allowed to form. The percentage of colony area was then quantified. After 6 h of treatment, a significant reduction in colony formation was observed only at 38 and 76 µM (p < 0.001), whereas no significant reduction was detected at 4.8, 9.5, or 19 µM (Fig. 1e).

In contrast, after 24 h of exposure, a significant reduction in colony formation was observed across a broader concentration range. Even the lowest concentration tested (4.8 µM) significantly reduced colony formation (p < 0.001), while complete suppression of colony formation was observed at concentrations ≥ 19 µM (p < 0.001; Fig. 1f).

SSC185 promotes morphological changes and reduces plasma membrane integrity

Next, the initial effects of SSC185 on the morphology and plasma membrane integrity of PC-3 cells were evaluated during the first 6 h of exposure. Plasma membrane integrity was assessed based on the proportion of PI− cells, which correspond to cells retaining the ability to exclude propidium iodide. Neutral red and rapid panoptic staining revealed concentration-dependent morphological changes. Treatment with SSC185 at 19 µM (IC₅₀) induced cytoplasmic vacuolization (Fig. 2a) and reduced the proportion of PI-negative (PI−) cells to 52.80% (p < 0.001; Fig. 2b), compared with 89.95% in the control group. At 38 µM (2× IC₅₀), cells exhibited retraction and prominent cytoplasmic vacuoles with intense basophilia (Fig. 2a), accompanied by a further reduction in the PI− population to 31.13% (p < 0.001; Fig. 2b). These findings indicate a concentration-dependent reduction in the proportion of cells retaining plasma membrane integrity. Although cytoplasmic vacuolization was observed at both 19 and 38 µM, the neutral red staining pattern differed from that observed following chloroquine treatment (CQ, 100 µM), indicating distinct patterns of vacuolar staining under these experimental conditions (Fig. 2a).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

SSC185 induces changes in the morphology of PC-3 cells with vacuole formation and loss of membrane integrity. a Representative images of the cell morphology assay of the PC-3 cell line after exposure to SSC185 at concentrations of 19 and 38 µM for 6 h. Chloroquine (100 µM) was used as a positive control, inducing cytoplasmic vacuolization. Images were enlarged to highlight cytoplasmic vacuolization. Escale (50 μm). b Representative histograms of cells stained with PI and a bar graph demonstrating the percentage of cells with intact membranes after exposure to SSC185 at concentrations of 19 and 38 µM for 6 h. c Representative histograms of cells stained with PI and a bar graph demonstrating the percentage of cells with intact membranes after exposure to SSC185 at concentrations of 19 and 38 µM for 24 h. Data were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test. The data are representative of three independent experiments. Bars, S.E.M; **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. Ctrl: Negative control; CQ: Chloroquine; PI: Propidium iodide

After 24 h of treatment, the proportion of PI− cells was reduced to 57.68% following exposure to 19 µM SSC185 (p < 0.001) and to 16.27% following exposure to 38 µM SSC185 (p < 0.001), compared with 94.47% in the control group (Fig. 2c). The marked reduction in the PI− population at 38 µM indicates a pronounced loss of plasma membrane integrity after prolonged exposure.

SSC185 induces time‑ and concentration‑dependent cell cycle alterations

Given that SSC185 impaired viability, morphology, and membrane integrity, its impact on cell cycle progression was evaluated in PC‑3 cells. Flow cytometry analysis demonstrated time- and concentration-dependent alterations in cell cycle distribution. After 6 h of treatment, SSC185 reduced the G0/G1 fraction and increased the proportion of cells with 4 C DNA content, consistent with accumulation in the G2/M phase. The proportion of cells in G2/M increased to 26.13% ± 1.00% at 19 µM and 23.93% ± 0.94% at 38 µM (p < 0.001), compared with 19.85% ± 0.39% in control cells (Fig. 3a). Correspondingly, the G0/G1 population decreased from 40.27% ± 1.31% in control cells to 31.04% ± 1.78% and 32.70% ± 1.72% at 19 and 38 µM, respectively (p < 0.01; Fig. 3a).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

SSC185 induces time- and concentration-dependent alterations in cell cycle distribution in PC-3 cells. a Representative histograms of DNA content distribution and a graph of the percentage of PC-3 cells in different cell cycle phases after exposure to SSC185 at concentrations of 19 and 38 µM for 6 h. b Representative histograms of DNA content distribution and a graph of the percentage of PC-3 cells in different cell cycle phases after exposure to SSC185 at concentrations of 19 and 38 µM for 24 h. Data were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test. Data are representative of three independent experiments. Bars, S.E.M.; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001

After 24 h, the effects diverged according to concentration. At 19 µM, the proportion of cells in G2/M remained elevated and further increased to 40.68% ± 2.01% (p ≤ 0.01; Fig. 3b). In contrast, at 38 µM, cells shifted predominantly to G0/G1 (46.47% ± 3.01%, p ≤ 0.01), accompanied by a reduction in the S‑phase fraction (17.79% ± 1.64%, p ≤ 0.01; Fig. 3b). Notably, the sub‑G0/G1 population already increased within the first 6 h at 38 µM, from 7.76% ± 0.50% in control cells to 11.21% ± 1.08% (p < 0.05), suggesting early onset of cell death-associated DNA fragmentation at the higher concentration.

Together, these data indicate that prolonged exposure to 19 µM SSC185 is associated with a sustained increase in the proportion of cells in G2/M, whereas treatment with 38 µM produces a distinct cell-cycle distribution characterized by increased G0/G1 and reduced S-phase fractions.

Exposure to SSC185 does not induce accumulation of acridine orange-stained acidic vesicles

Based on the cytoplasmic vacuolization observed after SSC185 treatment, acidic vesicular organelles were evaluated by acridine orange fluorescence microscopy. PC-3 cells were exposed to SSC185 at 19 and 38 µM for 24 h, while chloroquine (100 µM) was included as a reference condition (Fig. 4a). Quantitative analysis of the mean fluorescence intensity in the RFP channel showed no significant increase in SSC185-treated cells compared with the untreated control (p > 0.05; Fig. 4b). In contrast, chloroquine treatment produced a significant increase in RFP fluorescence (p < 0.01), indicating a greater accumulation of acidic vesicular compartments under this condition.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

SSC185 induced accumulation of SQSTM1/p62 without significant acidic vesicle formation. a Representative images of PC-3 cells stained with AO to assess the presence of acidic vesicular organelles. PC-3 cells were treated with SSC185 at concentrations of 19 µM and 38 µM for 24 h. CQ (100 µM) was used as a control. b The graph shows the average fluorescence in the RFP channel of the assay with AO. c Representative blots and analysis of the expression levels of LC3BI/II in extracts of PC-3 cells exposed to SSC185 at concentrations of 19 and 38 µM for 24 h. d Representative blots and analysis of the expression levels of SQSTM1/p62 in extracts of PC-3 cells exposed to SSC185 at concentrations of 19 and 38 µM for 24 h. Membranes were incubated with antibodies for the detection of target proteins and the loading controls GAPDH and/or tubulin. Data were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test. The data are representative of three independent experiments. Bars, S.E.M; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. AO: Acridine orange

The expression of the autophagy-related proteins LC3B and SQSTM1/p62 was subsequently evaluated by Western blotting. SSC185 treatment significantly increased LC3B-I levels (p < 0.01; Fig. 4c), whereas no detectable alteration in LC3B-II levels was observed. Concurrently, SQSTM1/p62 expression was significantly increased following SSC185 exposure (p < 0.01; Fig. 4d). Collectively, these results demonstrate that SSC185 induces changes in autophagy-related markers characterized by increased LC3B-I and SQSTM1/p62 levels, without detectable LC3B-II accumulation or an increase in acridine orange-stained acidic vesicles under the experimental conditions evaluated.

SSC185 modulates pathways involved in cellular survival and metabolism

To gain an initial understanding of the mechanisms underlying SSC185-induced cytotoxicity, an exploratory screening of proteins associated with key cell death and survival pathways was performed. PC-3 cells were treated with SSC185 (9.5, 19, and 38 µM) for 24 h, and total protein extracts were analyzed by Western blot. Membranes were probed for PARP1, phosphorylated AKT (p-AKT), total AKT (pan-AKT), phosphorylated RPS6 (p-RPS6), total RPS6, phosphorylated 4E-BP1 (p-4E-BP1), and total 4E-BP1, using GAPDH and α-tubulin as loading controls. Representative blot images are shown in Fig. 5a, and densitometric quantifications are presented in Fig. 5b. In this exploratory analysis, no PARP1 cleavage was detected after 24 h of treatment, while decreases in p-AKT, pan-AKT, p-RPS6, and 4E-BP1 levels were observed. As these initial observations were obtained from a single biological experiment, they were considered exploratory and were not subjected to statistical analysis.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

SSC185 alters AKT/RPS6-related signaling and increases p-ERK1 levels in PC-3. a Exploratory Western blot analysis of PARP1, p-AKT, pan-AKT, p-RPS6, RPS6, p-4E-BP1, and 4E-BP1 in total extracts of PC-3 cells treated with SSC185 (9.5, 19, and 38 µM) for 24 h. GAPDH and α-tubulin were used as loading controls. b Bands were quantified by densitometry and normalized to loading controls; the values presented refer to this single exploratory experiment and are not based on replicate experiments or statistical analyses. c Representative blots of the expression levels of phospho-RPS6, RPS6, phospho-ERK1/2, and ERK1/2 in extracts of PC-3 cells exposed to SSC185 at concentrations of 19 and 38 µM for 24 h. d Western blot analysis of the expression levels of phospho-RPS6, e RPS6, f phospho-ERK1, g ERK1, h phospho-ERK2, and i ERK2 in extracts of PC-3 cells exposed to SSC185 at concentrations of 19 and 38 µM for 24 h. Membranes were incubated with antibodies for the detection of target proteins and the loading controls GAPDH and/or tubulin. Data were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test. The data are representative of three independent experiments. Bars, S.E.M; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001

Based on these initial observations, RPS6 signaling was subsequently evaluated in three independent experiments, together with ERK1/2 (Fig. 5c) signaling, considering the central role of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR and MAPK/ERK pathways in maintaining cell survival and proliferative capacity. Western blot analysis (Fig. 5d) showed that exposure to SSC185 significantly reduced the levels of phosphorylated ribosomal protein S6 (p-RPS6) (p < 0.01), a downstream effector of the mTOR pathway, compared to the control group. Total S6 protein expression levels were not affected (Fig. 5e). In contrast, under the same treatment conditions, a significant increase in phosphorylated ERK1 (p-ERK1) was observed (Fig. 5f; p < 0.01), while the levels of phosphorylated ERK2 (p-ERK2) and total ERK1/2 remained unchanged (Fig. 5g, h, i).

Nutrient deprivation enhances the cellular response to SSC185 and increases its sensitivity to NAC pretreatment

Nutrient deprivation was used to assess whether the cellular response to SSC185 was influenced by nutritional conditions. Additionally, pharmacological modulators targeting processes related to autophagy (CQ), caspase activity (Q‑VD‑OPh), protein synthesis (CHX), and redox-sensitive (NAC) responses were employed to further characterize the response profile to SSC185 under standard and nutrient-deprived conditions.

Under standard culture conditions supplemented with FBS, pretreatment with these pharmacological inhibitors did not produce significant changes in IC₅₀ values compared with SSC185 alone (Fig. 6b, d). In contrast, when the assay was performed under starvation conditions, a marked reduction in IC₅₀ was observed, from 24.69 µM (Fig. 6a) to 4.20 µM (Fig. 6e), indicating that nutrient deprivation substantially enhances the effect of SSC185 on MTT reduction. Notably, under starvation, pretreatment with NAC partially attenuated this effect, increasing the IC₅₀ to 11.51 µM (p < 0.01) (Fig. 6f, h).

SSC185 reduces mitochondrial membrane potential under standard and nutrient-deprived conditions

To evaluate mitochondrial responses to SSC185, mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm) was assessed using rhodamine 123. After 6 h of exposure, no statistically significant differences in the proportion of Rho123 − cells were observed between SSC185-treated groups and the control group (Fig. 7a). After 24 h of exposure, treatment with 38 µM SSC185 significantly increased the proportion of Rho123 − cells to 27.84% ± 3.52 (p < 0.01), indicating a reduction in mitochondrial membrane potential (Fig. 7b).

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

SSC185 induces concentration- and time-induced mitochondrial depolarization, accentuated under nutrient deprivation conditions. a Representative histograms of mitochondrial depolarization of PC-3 cells stained with Rhd 123 and a graph showing the percentages of cells with depolarized mitochondrial membranes after exposure to SSC185 at concentrations of 19 and 38 µM for 6 h. b Representative histograms of mitochondrial depolarization of PC-3 cells stained with Rhd 123 and a graph showing the percentages of cells with depolarized mitochondrial membranes after exposure to SSC185 at concentrations of 19 and 38 µM for 24 h. A and B represent standard culture conditions. c Representative histograms of mitochondrial depolarization of PC-3 cells stained with Rhd 123 and a graph showing the percentages of cells with depolarized mitochondrial membranes after exposure to SSC185 at a concentration of 4 µM, 25 µM of CQ, and co-treated with SSC185 and CQ (4 µM + 25 µM) for 24 h under nutrient deprivation conditions. Data were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test. Data are representative of three independent experiments. Bars, S.E.M.; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. CQ: chloroquine. ND: Nutrient deprivation

Under nutrient deprivation, treatment with 4 µM SSC185 also significantly increased the Rho123 − population to 23.39% ± 3.44 (p < 0.01), compared with cells maintained in complete medium (8.24% ± 0.74) and nutrient-deprived controls (10.25% ± 1.44). Co-treatment with chloroquine (CQ, 25 µM) did not prevent the increase in the Rho123 − population associated with SSC185 treatment (Fig. 7c), whereas CQ alone did not significantly alter the proportion of Rho123 − cells compared with the corresponding controls.

Nutrient deprivation dissociates the effects of SSC185 on the cell cycle of PC-3

Cell-cycle distribution and plasma membrane integrity were evaluated in PC-3 cells under nutrient-deprived conditions following treatment with SSC185. Plasma membrane integrity was assessed based on the proportion of PI− cells, which correspond to cells retaining the ability to exclude propidium iodide. The PI− population was 93.40% ± 0.39 in FBS-supplemented controls and 85.12% ± 1.99 in nutrient-deprived controls. Treatment with 4 µM SSC185 under nutrient deprivation significantly reduced the proportion of PI− cells to 63.70% ± 4.39 (p < 0.001), indicating a reduction in the population of cells with preserved plasma membrane integrity (Fig. 8a, c). CQ (25 µM) similarly reduced the PI− population to 69.80% ± 3.26 (p ≤ 0.01), while co-treatment with SSC185 and CQ further reduced this population to 54.25% ± 2.13 (p < 0.01) compared with CQ alone.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

SSC185 compromises membrane integrity without altering the distribution of cell cycle phases in nutrient deprivation-treated prostate cancer cells. a Representative histograms of propidium iodide-stained cells, showing cells with intact membranes after exposure to SSC185 (4 µM), CQ (25 µM), and SSC185 + CQ (4 µM + 25 µM) after 24 h. b Bar graph demonstrating the percentage of cells with intact membranes after exposure to SSC185. c Histogram of the distribution of DNA content in different groups of PC-3 cells after 24 h of treatment. d Graph of the percentage of PC-3 cells in different cell cycle phases, exposed to SSC185 at a concentration of 4 µM, 25 µM (CQ), and co-treated with CQ (4 µM + 25 µM) stained with PI after 24 h of nutrient deprivation. e Fluorescence analysis of the AO assay in nutrient-deprived PC-3 cells. f Fluorescence images of the AO assay in nutrient-deprived PC-3 cells. Cells were exposed to SSC185 (4 µM), CQ (25 µM), or the combination SSC185 (4 µM) + CQ (25 µM). Two control groups were included in this experiment: a control group under standard culture conditions and another group under nutrient-deprived conditions. Data were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test. The data are representative of three independent experiments. Bars, S.E.M.; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. AO: acridine Orange; CQ: chloroquine; ND: Nutrient deprivation; PI: propidium iodide

Analysis of cell-cycle distribution showed that treatment with 4 µM SSC185 did not significantly alter the proportion of cells in G0/G1, S, or G2/M phases compared with the corresponding controls under either FBS-supplemented or nutrient-deprived conditions. In contrast, CQ treatment under nutrient deprivation increased the proportion of cells in G0/G1 (46.93% ± 2.38; p ≤ 0.05) and reduced the S-phase fraction (16.48% ± 2.33; p ≤ 0.05), indicating an altered cell-cycle distribution under this experimental condition.

SSC185 does not increase acidic vesicle accumulation under nutrient deprivation

To evaluate changes in acidic vesicular compartments under nutrient-deprived conditions, PC-3 cells were analyzed by acridine orange staining following treatment with SSC185. The fluorescence pattern was similar to that observed under standard culture conditions, as SSC185 did not significantly increase the mean fluorescence intensity in the RFP channel (Fig. 8e, f). In contrast, CQ treatment resulted in a significant increase in RFP fluorescence (p < 0.05), consistent with greater accumulation of acridine orange-stained acidic vesicular compartments. Co-treatment with SSC185 and CQ produced a non-significant increase in RFP fluorescence compared with the corresponding control condition. These findings indicate that SSC185 does not promote detectable accumulation of acidic vesicular compartments under nutrient deprivation.

SSC185 exhibits time-dependent thiol reactivity

To further assess the possibility of nonspecific electrophilic reactivity, a DTNB-based thiol-reactivity assay was performed with L-cysteine under physiologically relevant conditions. SSC185 induced a mild-to-moderate and time-dependent reduction in free L-cysteine levels, with 78.50% ± 2.78 of thiol content remaining after 120 min at 50 µM. A weaker effect was observed at 25 µM (87.55% ± 4.25), suggesting partial concentration dependence. Importantly, the overall profile was comparable to that observed for curcumin, the reference electrophilic compound (84.46% ± 4.53 and 87.28% ± 0.66 at concentrations of 50 µM and 25 µM, respectively). These findings indicate that SSC185 exhibits measurable but not rapid or exhaustive thiol reactivity under the tested conditions (Fig. 9).

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

SSC185 exhibits moderate time-dependent reactivity to thiols. Reactivity of SSC185 to thiols as a function of time, evaluated using a DTNB-based L-cysteine assay. SSC185 or curcumin (25 µM or 50 µM) was incubated with L-cysteine (250 µM) in phosphate buffer pH 7.4 for the indicated time intervals, and the remaining levels of free L-cysteine were quantified using the DTNB/Ellman reagent at 405 nm. Data are expressed as a percentage of remaining free L-cysteine relative to the corresponding L-cysteine control, after correction for background and compound absorbance. Curcumin was used as an electrophilic reference compound. The data are representative of experiments in triplicate. Bars, S.E.M

Discussion

In this study, we investigated the effects of the sulfonamide-chalcone hybrid SSC185 on androgen-independent PC-3 prostate cancer cells and observed that its cellular effects depend on exposure time, concentration, and nutritional conditions. The greater response observed under nutrient deprivation highlights the influence of the nutritional context on SSC185 activity and suggests that cellular adaptation to limited nutrient availability may shape the response of PC-3 cells to the compound [42, 43].

From a structural standpoint, the sulfonamide moiety exhibits distinctive electronic properties, acting simultaneously as a hydrogen-bond donor and acceptor, which favors stable interactions with diverse biomolecular targets [44]. In addition, the presence of two highly electronegative oxygen atoms bound to sulfur confers pronounced polarity to this fragment, a feature commonly associated with protein and enzyme recognition [45, 46]. The chalcone scaffold, in turn, contains an α,β‑unsaturated carbonyl group recognized as a prototypical Michael acceptor [47, 48]. This electrophilic center can form covalent adducts with cellular nucleophiles, particularly cysteine residues in regulatory proteins and metabolic enzymes. Consistent with this structural feature, SSC185 displayed measurable and time-dependent thiol reactivity in a DTNB-based assay using L-cysteine under physiological-like conditions, indicating the ability to interact with sulfhydryl-containing molecules without inducing rapid or exhaustive thiol depletion [49, 50]. Such covalent modifications may alter protein function, stability, or recognition by protein quality control systems, thereby disrupting cellular homeostasis [51, 52]. While electrophilic chalcone-containing compounds may potentially interact with multiple nucleophilic targets, selectivity in these systems is often influenced by binding orientation, target-site microenvironment, and the balance between reversible and irreversible interactions [53]. Therefore, additional studies will be important to further characterize target engagement and molecular selectivity associated with SSC185. In tumor cells, the formation of these adducts has been associated with dysregulation of redox‑sensitive signaling pathways, impairment of energy metabolism, and accumulation of misfolded or damaged proteins, contributing to proteotoxic stress and activation of cell death mechanisms [52, 54, 55]. Although α,β-unsaturated systems are sometimes associated with pan-assay interference compounds (PAINS) due to their potential electrophilic reactivity, increasing evidence indicates that not all Michael acceptors behave as nonspecific promiscuous agents, and several clinically relevant compounds contain related electrophilic motifs [56, 57]. In this context, the moderate and progressive thiol reactivity profile observed for SSC185, combined with its biological effects, contradicts the hypothesis of a mechanism driven solely by indiscriminate thiol sequestration. Thus, the hybrid structure of SSC185, combining a sulfonamide motif commonly linked to enzyme modulation with a conjugated aromatic system bearing Michael acceptor properties and electronegative substituents that tune electronic and lipophilic profiles, suggests the potential for multitarget cellular interactions [58–60].

Our comparison of continuous and intermittent exposure protocols showed that short treatments were insufficient to elicit robust cytotoxicity, whereas prolonged exposures resulted in a greater reduction in MTT signal and clonogenic capacity. The loss of proliferative potential observed in clonogenic assays, particularly after 24 h of treatment, even at lower concentrations, suggests that SSC185 induces irreversible cellular damage, likely associated with loss of metabolic competence and eventual activation of late cell death programs [61, 62]. These findings support the notion that SSC185 exerts a time‑dependent, cumulative effect, consistent with intracellular accumulation and progressive stress induction rather than an immediate cytotoxic insult [63, 64]. Similar behavior has been reported for sulfonamides and chalcone derivatives acting as modulators of cellular homeostasis [65, 66], survival pathways [67–71], energy metabolism [72–75], and mitochondrial integrity [76–78].

SQSTM1/p62 is a multifunctional adaptor protein that links LC3B to ubiquitinated substrates, thereby promoting their sequestration into autophagosomes for degradation [79, 80]. In many contexts, simultaneous LC3B-I-to-LC3B-II conversion and p62 accumulation indicate an aborted or inefficient autophagic response, often reflecting a late blockade of autophagic flux [9, 81–83]. In the present study, SSC185 induced a significant increase in SQSTM1/p62 and LC3B-I levels after 24 h of treatment, without a detectable change in LC3B-II or a significant increase in acridine orange-stained acidic vesicles. This pattern indicates that SSC185 alters the expression profile of autophagy-related markers; however, it does not allow definitive conclusions regarding autophagic flux. In particular, SQSTM1/p62 accumulation may result from different cellular processes, including changes in its synthesis, degradation, or stress-responsive regulation, and therefore cannot be interpreted solely as evidence of impaired autophagic degradation [84, 85]. Similarly, the absence of detectable LC3B-II accumulation does not exclude alterations in autophagic activity, since LC3B-II levels reflect the balance between its formation and degradation. Thus, the molecular changes observed following SSC185 treatment may reflect a cellular stress-associated response involving autophagy-related proteins, although their functional relationship with autophagic flux remains to be established. Dynamic approaches, including time-course analyses and direct measurements of autophagic flux, would be required to determine the mechanistic significance of these alterations.

In this context, it is important to consider that SQSTM1/p62 is a multifunctional adapter protein involved in various cellular stress response pathways through its multiple protein-interaction domains [26, 86]. Previous studies have demonstrated that p62 expression can be modulated in response to oxidative and proteotoxic stress and is functionally linked to stress-responsive pathways, including the KEAP1/NRF2 axis [26, 87–90]. Against this backdrop, the increase in SQSTM1/p62 levels observed following SSC185 treatment may represent a stress-associated cellular response. The morphological changes observed after exposure to SSC185, including cytoplasmic vacuolization and loss of plasma membrane integrity, corroborate the occurrence of cellular injury but do not establish a direct link to p62 accumulation [91–93]. Thus, current data do not determine whether p62 accumulation contributes functionally to SSC185-induced cytotoxicity or represents a secondary response to cellular stress. Furthermore, inhibition of protein synthesis with cycloheximide did not substantially alter the response to SSC185 under the conditions evaluated, suggesting that ongoing protein synthesis is not required for the observed effect [94, 95]. Consequently, these findings indicate that SSC185 treatment is associated with alterations in markers related to stress and proteostasis; however, the functional contribution of SQSTM1/p62 and the specific mechanisms underlying these changes remain to be determined.

Data from the literature highlight the importance of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in many cellular processes, contributing especially to the growth and survival of various tumors [96–98], and this pathway is frequently hyperactivated in prostate cancer [99–102]; Notably, 4E-BP1 is frequently hyperphosphorylated in CRPC, allowing for high cap-dependent translational activity via eIF4E [103, 104]. In the exploratory immunoblot analysis, SSC185 treatment was associated with reduced AKT and total 4E-BP1 levels, whereas phosphorylated 4E-BP1 remained relatively unchanged. Although these observations may indicate differential regulation of signaling pathways involved in cell growth and protein synthesis, their exploratory nature precludes quantitative interpretation. In contrast, the reduction in p-RPS6 was consistently observed in subsequent independent experiments, supporting an effect of SSC185 on this downstream signaling component. Likewise, the increase in p-ERK1 may be consistent with the activation of a compensatory stress-response mechanism [105], although its functional significance remains to be established. These molecular alterations were accompanied by time-dependent changes in cell-cycle distribution and a progressive reduction in clonogenic capacity. At earlier exposure times, alterations in cell-cycle distribution were observed without comparable loss of long-term proliferative capacity at lower SSC185 concentrations, whereas prolonged exposure resulted in a more pronounced and persistent reduction in clonogenic potential. Previous studies have shown that inhibition of the PI3K/AKT axis can reduce RPS6 phosphorylation and alter cell-cycle progression and the expression of cell-cycle regulatory proteins in prostate cancer cells, supporting an important role for PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in the maintenance of prostate cancer cell proliferation [106–108]. Nevertheless, although the signaling alterations observed here occurred alongside the progressive cellular effects of SSC185, the present data do not establish a direct causal relationship between these molecular changes and the development of sustained cytotoxic effects.

Evaluation of SSC185 under standard and nutrient-deprived conditions revealed a marked influence of the nutritional context on the cellular response to the compound. Under standard culture conditions, pharmacological modulation of autophagy, protein synthesis, apoptosis, or redox status did not substantially alter the response to SSC185. In contrast, nutrient deprivation markedly potentiated SSC185 activity, reducing the concentration required to affect the MTT signal. Under this condition, pre-treatment with NAC partially attenuated the effect of SSC185. Although NAC is widely used as an antioxidant and a precursor for intracellular cysteine and glutathione, its protective effects may also involve direct interactions with reactive electrophilic species [109, 110]. Therefore, the partial protection conferred by NAC cannot be interpreted as direct evidence that oxidative stress mediates SSC185 activity. Mitochondrial membrane potential also decreased during prolonged exposure and under nutrient-deprivation conditions, indicating that mitochondrial dysfunction accompanies the cellular response to SSC185. Although these findings demonstrate that nutrient deprivation increases the sensitivity of PC-3 cells to SSC185 and that this intensified response is associated with alterations in redox-sensitive and mitochondrial parameters, further studies are needed to directly assess cellular metabolism and determine the metabolic processes involved.

Conclusion

Taken together, the results of this study demonstrate that SSC185 exerts time- and concentration-dependent effects on androgen-independent PC-3 prostate cancer cells. These effects were accompanied by alterations in cell cycle distribution, reduced AKT/RPS6 signaling, and increased levels of SQSTM1/p62 and LC3B-I without detectable accumulation of LC3B-II or increased formation of acidic vesicles, as well as a delayed compromise of mitochondrial membrane potential. Notably, nutrient deprivation markedly potentiated the cellular response to SSC185, lowering the concentrations required to affect the MTT signal and clonogenic potential. In summary, the data suggest that SSC185 activity is influenced by the cellular nutritional context and involves coordinated changes in signaling, stress-related proteins, and mitochondrial function. Further investigation into these interconnected cellular responses may help elucidate the molecular processes underlying the enhanced effects of SSC185 under nutrient-deprived conditions.

Although additional studies will be necessary to further characterize target selectivity, pharmacological safety, and the molecular mechanisms underlying SSC185 activity, including orthogonal approaches to evaluate covalent interactions and protein engagement, the present findings support the potential of sulfonamide-chalcone hybrids as promising pharmacological scaffolds capable of compromising adaptive stress responses and proliferative capacity in aggressive prostate cancer cell models.

Acknowledgements

All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript. The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), and acknowledge the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Piauí (FAPEPI) and the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Goiás (FAPEG) for scholarship and financial aid.

Author contributions

Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft: ARAUJO, G.S.; Formal analysis, Methodology: de SÁ, R.E.; Formal analysis, Methodology: SILVA, S.A.N.M.; Formal analysis, Methodology: MACHADO, F.S.; Conceptualization, Validation, Resources: PEREZ, C.N.; Formal analysis, Methodology: CASTRO, M.R.C.; Formal analysis, Methodology: GARNIQUE, A.D.M.B.; Formal analysis, Methodology: ALMEIDA, B.O.; Formal analysis, Methodology: LIMA, K.; Validation, Investigation, Resources: MACHADO-NETO, J.A.; Investigation, Resources: COSTA-LOTUFO, L.V.; Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing, Resources: MARINHO-FILHO, J.D.B.; Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding Acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing: ARAÚJO, A.J.

Funding

The Article Processing Charge (APC) for the publication of this research was funded by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES) (ROR identifier: 00x0ma614). This research was supported by Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) and National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq grant #303048/2022-0). The authors also acknowledge financial support from the National Institute of Science and Technology – INCT BioNat, (CNPq grant #465637/2014-0, FAPESP grant # 2014/50926-0, Brazil), INCT Polysaccharides (CNPq grant #406973/2022-9) and INCT NATURE (CNPQ grant # 408549/2024-6).

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this article.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.López-López E, Espinoza‐Castañeda JI, Martinez‐Mayorga K, Medina‐Franco JL (2026) Structure–property associations: breaking paradigms for linking chemical structures and biological properties in drug discovery. ChemMedChem. 10.1002/cmdc.202500847 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wu K, Karapetyan E, Schloss J et al (2023) Advancements in small molecule drug design: a structural perspective. Drug Discov Today 28:103730. 10.1016/j.drudis.2023.103730 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pawełczyk A, Sowa-Kasprzak K, Olender D, Zaprutko L (2018) Molecular consortia—various structural and synthetic concepts for more effective therapeutics synthesis. Int J Mol Sci 19:1104. 10.3390/ijms19041104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ivasiv V, Albertini C, Gonçalves AE et al (2019) Molecular hybridization as a tool for designing multitarget drug candidates for complex diseases. Curr Top Med Chem 19:1694–1711. 10.2174/1568026619666190619115735 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bahekar SP, Hande SV, Agrawal NR et al (2016) Sulfonamide chalcones: Synthesis and in vitro exploration for therapeutic potential against Brugia malayi. Eur J Med Chem 124:262–269. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2016.08.042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Castaño LF, Cuartas V, Bernal A et al (2019) New chalcone-sulfonamide hybrids exhibiting anticancer and antituberculosis activity. Eur J Med Chem 176:50–60. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2019.05.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cao V, Sukanadi IP, Loeanurit N et al (2023) A sulfonamide chalcone inhibited dengue virus with a potential target at the SAM-binding site of viral methyltransferase. Antivir Res 220:105753. 10.1016/j.antiviral.2023.105753 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.de Oliveira NS, de Souza LG, de Almeida VM et al (2024) Synthesis and evaluation of hybrid sulfonamide-chalcones with potential antileishmanial activity. Arch Pharm (Weinheim). 10.1002/ardp.202300440 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Souza JMT, de Negreiros Matos Silva SA, de Sá RE et al (2025) ZnO nanoparticles enhance the cytotoxic effects of a chalcone-sulfonamide hybrid by impairing the autophagic flux and upregulating HIF-1α expression. Bioorg Chem 166:109127. 10.1016/j.bioorg.2025.109127 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Maydt D, De Spirt S, Muschelknautz C et al (2013) Chemical reactivity and biological activity of chalcones and other α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds. Xenobiotica 43:711–718. 10.3109/00498254.2012.754112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Toublet F-X, Laurent A, Pouget C (2025) A review of natural and synthetic chalcones as anticancer agents targeting topoisomerase enzymes. Molecules 30:2498. 10.3390/molecules30122498 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Villa SM, Heckman J, Bandyopadhyay D (2024) Medicinally privileged natural chalcones: abundance, mechanisms of action, and clinical trials. Int J Mol Sci 25:9623. 10.3390/ijms25179623 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Khan FA, Mushtaq S, Naz S et al (2018) Sulfonamides as potential bioactive scaffolds. Curr Org Chem 22:818–830. 10.2174/1385272822666180122153839 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Öztürk C, Kalay E, Gerni S et al (2024) Sulfonamide derivatives with benzothiazole scaffold: synthesis and carbonic anhydrase I–II inhibition properties. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 71:223–231. 10.1002/bab.2534 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Iqbal T, Khan S, Rahim F et al (2024) Benzothiazole based sulfonamide scaffolds as active inhibitors of alpha-amylase and alpha-glucosidase; synthesis, structure confirmation, In silico molecular docking and ADME analysis. J Mol Struct 1309:138074. 10.1016/j.molstruc.2024.138074 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mendoza EN, Ciriolo MR, Ciccarone F (2025) Hypoxia-induced reactive oxygen species: their role in cancer resistance and emerging therapies to overcome it. Antioxidants 14:94. 10.3390/antiox14010094 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ahmad F, Cherukuri MK, Choyke PL (2021) Metabolic reprogramming in prostate cancer. Br J Cancer 125:1185–1196. 10.1038/s41416-021-01435-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wang Y, Chen Y, Wang J (2025) Role of tumor microenvironment in prostate cancer immunometabolism. Biomolecules 15:826. 10.3390/biom15060826 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Petrella G, Corsi F, Ciufolini G et al (2022) Metabolic reprogramming of castration-resistant prostate cancer cells as a response to chemotherapy. Metabolites 13:65. 10.3390/metabo13010065 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wanjari UR, Mukherjee AG, Gopalakrishnan AV et al (2023) Role of metabolism and metabolic pathways in prostate cancer. Metabolites 13:183. 10.3390/metabo13020183 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hoxhaj G, Manning BD (2020) The PI3K–AKT network at the interface of oncogenic signalling and cancer metabolism. Nat Rev Cancer 20:74–88. 10.1038/s41568-019-0216-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Popova NV, Jücker M (2021) The role of mTOR signaling as a therapeutic target in cancer. Int J Mol Sci 22:1743. 10.3390/ijms22041743 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.White EZ, Pennant NM, Carter JR et al (2020) Serum deprivation initiates adaptation and survival to oxidative stress in prostate cancer cells. Sci Rep 10:12505. 10.1038/s41598-020-68668-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Shukla M, Narayan M (2024) Proteostasis and its role in disease development. Cell Biochem Biophys 83:1725–1741. 10.1007/s12013-024-01581-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ross AB, Langer JD, Jovanovic M (2021) Proteome turnover in the spotlight: approaches, applications, and perspectives. Mol Cell Proteomics 20:100016. 10.1074/mcp.R120.002190 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yang X, Cao X, Zhu Q (2025) p62/SQSTM1 in cancer: phenomena, mechanisms, and regulation in DNA damage repair. Cancer Metastasis Rev 44:33. 10.1007/s10555-025-10250-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Xiao S, Yu Y, Liao M et al (2025) Post-translational modification of p62: roles and regulations in autophagy. Cells 14:1016. 10.3390/cells14131016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zayani Z, Matinahmadi A, Tavakolpournegari A, Bidooki SH (2025) Exploring stressors: impact on cellular organelles and implications for cellular functions. Stresses 5:26. 10.3390/stresses5020026 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wang Y, He J, Lian S et al (2024) Targeting metabolic–redox nexus to regulate drug resistance: from mechanism to tumor therapy. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) 13:828. 10.3390/antiox13070828 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Nesher E, Das SR, Koman I (2026) Abstract 4718: Redox reprogramming protects colon cancer cells from disulfidptosis under glucose deprivation. Cancer Res 86:4718–4718. 10.1158/1538-7445.AM2026-4718 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Moura AF, de Castro MRC, Naves RF et al (2021) New synthetic sulfonamide chalcone induced cell cycle arrest and cell death in colorectal adenocarcinoma metastatic cells (SW-620). Anticancer Agents Med Chem 22:2340–2351. 10.2174/1871520621666211213092121 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Araújo G, Moura AF, Barros AB et al (2024) Sulfonamide-chalcone hybrid compound suppresses cellular adhesion and migration: experimental and computational insight. Chem Biol Interact 398:111115. 10.1016/j.cbi.2024.111115 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mosmann T (1983) Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods 65:55–63 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lima K, de Miranda LBL, Del Milagro Bernabe Garnique A et al (2023) The multikinase inhibitor AD80 induces mitotic catastrophe and autophagy in pancreatic cancer cells. Cancers (Basel) 15:3866. 10.3390/cancers15153866 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.de Sá RE, de Araújo GS, Machado F et al (2024) Withaphysalin derivatives from Iochroma arborescens induce antiproliferative and antimigratory activities in vitro. Planta Med 90:938–948. 10.1055/a-2381-5060 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Repetto G, del Peso A, Zurita JL (2008) Neutral red uptake assay for the estimation of cell viability/cytotoxicity. Nat Protoc 3:1125–1131. 10.1038/nprot.2008.75 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Araújo AJ, de Souza AA, da Silva Júnior EN et al (2012) Growth inhibitory effects of 3′-nitro-3-phenylamino nor-beta-lapachone against HL-60: a redox-dependent mechanism. Toxicol In Vitro 26:585–594. 10.1016/j.tiv.2012.02.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Giacomini I, Cortini M, Tinazzi M et al (2023) Contribution of mitochondrial activity to doxorubicin-resistance in osteosarcoma cells. Cancers (Basel) 15:1370. 10.3390/cancers15051370 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Jung YY, Um J-Y, Chinnathambi A et al (2022) Withanolide modulates the potential crosstalk between apoptosis and autophagy in different colorectal cancer cell lines. Eur J Pharmacol 928:175113. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2022.175113 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Diccini I, Parducci NS, de Almeida BO et al (2025) Cephalochromin effects in triple-negative breast cancer cells: apoptosis induction and modulation of survival pathways. J Nat Prod 88:2851–2859. 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.5c01020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Böhme A, Thaens D, Paschke A, Schüürmann G (2009) Kinetic glutathione chemoassay to quantify thiol reactivity of organic electrophiles—application to α,β-unsaturated ketones, acrylates, and propiolates. Chem Res Toxicol 22:742–750. 10.1021/tx800492x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lee CJ, Yoon H (2024) Metabolic adaptation and cellular stress response as targets for cancer therapy. World J Mens Health 42:62. 10.5534/wjmh.230153 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ding H, Meng Q, Zhou J et al (2025) Revisiting the role of metabolic reprogramming as a contributor to prostate cancer disease progression. Chin Med J (Engl) 138:3381–3391. 10.1097/CM9.0000000000003844 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hanna FE, Hunter CA (2024) Polarisation effects on the H-bond acceptor properties of sulfonamides. Chem Commun 60:11750–11753. 10.1039/D4CC03530E [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Supuran C (2017) Special Issue: Sulfonamides. Molecules 22:1642. 10.3390/molecules22101642 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Purder P, Meyners C, Sugiarto W et al (2023) Deconstructing protein binding of sulfonamides and sulfonamide analogs. JACS Au. 10.1021/jacsau.3c00241 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zhuang C, Zhang W, Sheng C et al (2017) Chalcone: a privileged structure in medicinal chemistry. Chem Rev 117:7762–7810. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Andrés CMC, Pérez de la Lastra JM, Bustamante Munguira E et al (2024) Michael acceptors as anti-cancer compounds: coincidence or causality? Int J Mol Sci 25:6099. 10.3390/ijms25116099 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Zambaldo C, Vinogradova EV, Qi X et al (2020) 2-Sulfonylpyridines as tunable, cysteine-reactive electrophiles. J Am Chem Soc 142:8972–8979. 10.1021/jacs.0c02721 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Ghorbani F, You S, Grabovyi GA et al (2024) Scalable thiol reactivity profiling identifies azetidinyl oxadiazoles as cysteine-targeting electrophiles. J Am Chem Soc 146:32333–32342. 10.1021/jacs.4c05711 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wall SB, Smith MR, Ricart K et al (2014) Detection of electrophile-sensitive proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta - Gen Subj 1840:913–922. 10.1016/j.bbagen.2013.09.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Min J-Y, Chun K-S, Kim D-H (2023) The versatile utility of cysteine as a target for cancer treatment. Front Oncol. 10.3389/fonc.2022.997919 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Zhou B (2015) Diverse Molecular Targets for Chalcones with Varied Bioactivities. Med Chem (Los Angeles). 10.4172/2161-0444.1000291 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Liang S-T, Chen C, Chen R-X et al (2022) Michael acceptor molecules in natural products and their mechanism of action. Front Pharmacol. 10.3389/fphar.2022.1033003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Feng D, Li X, Liu J et al (2025) Selectively triggered: ROS-activated Michael acceptor prodrug strategy to enhance tumor targeting efficacy. Chem Sci 16:15628–15637. 10.1039/D5SC03429A [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Jöst C, Nitsche C, Scholz T et al (2014) Promiscuity and selectivity in covalent enzyme inhibition: a systematic study of electrophilic fragments. J Med Chem 57:7590–7599. 10.1021/jm5006918 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Jackson PA, Widen JC, Harki DA, Brummond KM (2017) Covalent Modifiers: A Chemical Perspective on the Reactivity of α,β-Unsaturated Carbonyls with Thiols via Hetero-Michael Addition Reactions. J Med Chem 60:839–885. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b00788 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Lee K, Lee DH, Kim J-H et al (2016) The chalcone derivative HymnPro generates reactive oxygen species through depletion of intracellular glutathione. Appl Biol Chem 59:391–396. 10.1007/s13765-016-0168-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Bhoj PS, Bahekar S, Khatri V et al (2021) Role of glutathione in chalcone derivative induced apoptosis of brugia malayi and its possible therapeutic implication. Acta Parasitol 66:406–415. 10.1007/s11686-020-00291-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Shin SY, Jung E, Lim Y et al (2022) Synthesis, crystal structure, Hirshfeld surface analysis and docking studies of a novel flavone–chalcone hybrid compound demonstrating anticancer effects by generating ROS through glutathione depletion. Crystals 12:108. 10.3390/cryst12010108 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Luo S, Dang X, Wang J et al (2021) Biological evaluation of mitochondria targeting small molecules as potent anticancer drugs. Bioorg Chem 114:105055. 10.1016/j.bioorg.2021.105055 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Forgie BN, Prakash R, Goyeneche AA, Telleria CM (2024) Vitality, viability, long-term clonogenic survival, cytotoxicity, cytostasis and lethality: what do they mean when testing new investigational oncology drugs? Discov Oncol 15:5. 10.1007/s12672-023-00857-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Eastman A (2017) Improving anticancer drug development begins with cell culture: misinformation perpetrated by the misuse of cytotoxicity assays. Oncotarget 8:8854–8866. 10.18632/oncotarget.12673 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Evans DM, Fang J, Silvers T et al (2019) Exposure time versus cytotoxicity for anticancer agents. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 84:359–371. 10.1007/s00280-019-03863-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Birsa ML, Sarbu LG (2023) Hydroxy chalcones and analogs with chemopreventive properties. Int J Mol Sci 24:10667. 10.3390/ijms241310667 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Nazmeen A, Maiti S, Maiti S (2024) Dialyl-sulfide with trans-chalcone prevent breast cancer prohibiting SULT1E1 malregulations and oxidant-stress induced HIF1a-MMPs induction. Genes Cancer 15:41–59. 10.18632/genesandcancer.237 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Huang Z, Jin G (2022) Licochalcone B induced apoptosis and autophagy in osteosarcoma tumor cells via the inactivation of PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. Biol Pharm Bull. 10.1248/bpb.b21-00991 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Noser AA, Shehadi IA, Abdelmonsef AH, Salem MM (2022) Newly synthesized pyrazolinone chalcones as anticancer agents via inhibiting the PI3K/Akt/ERK1/2 signaling pathway. ACS Omega 7:25265–25277. 10.1021/acsomega.2c02181 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Lee S-H, Lee H, Kwon Y-J et al (2025) Chalcone-9: a novel inhibitor of the JAK-STAT pathway with potent anti-cancer effects in triple-negative breast cancer cells. Pharmacol Rep 77:761–774. 10.1007/s43440-025-00721-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Wang X, Liang Y, Zhang B et al (2024) 2’-hydroxychalcone induces autophagy and apoptosis in breast cancer cells via the inhibition of the NF-κB signaling pathway: in vitro and in vivo studies. Nutrients 16:514. 10.3390/nu16040514 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Gao H, Li Z, Wang K et al (2023) Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of sulfonamide methoxypyridine derivatives as novel PI3K/mTOR dual inhibitors. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 16:461. 10.3390/ph16030461 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Khokhlov AL, Shetnev AA, Korsakov MK et al (2023) Pharmacological properties of sulfonamide derivatives, new inhibitors of carbonic anhydrase. Bull Exp Biol Med 175:205–209. 10.1007/s10517-023-05835-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Kurban MG, Çakmak R, Başaran E et al (2024) Synthesis of new sulfonamide derivatives: investigation of their interactions with carbonic anhydrase and cholinesterase enzymes by in vitro and in silico evaluations. J Mol Struct 1314:138798. 10.1016/j.molstruc.2024.138798 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Wang Q, Qiao H, Yuan W et al (2026) Discovery of novel chalcone derivatives containing benzimidazole possessing anti-tumor potential in vitro and in vivo. Biomed Pharmacother 194:118912. 10.1016/j.biopha.2025.118912 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Wang Y, Ma J, Yan X et al (2016) Isoliquiritigenin inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis via alleviating hypoxia and reducing glycolysis in mouse melanoma B16F10 cells. Recent Pat Anticancer Drug Discov 11:215–227. 10.2174/1573406412666160307151904 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Ling J, Li X, Wang M et al (2024) Novel sulfonyl-substituted tetrandrine derivatives for colon cancer treatment by inducing mitochondrial apoptosis and inhibiting PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. Bioorg Chem 143:107069. 10.1016/j.bioorg.2023.107069 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Espinoza-Hicks JC, Salinas-Vera YM, Camarillo-Cisneros J et al (2025) O-prenylchalcones inhibit cell proliferation and activate apoptosis by inducing mitochondrial dysfunction in gastric cancer cells. Discov Oncol 16:1292. 10.1007/s12672-025-03130-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Liu Z, Wang M, Huang R et al (2023) Novel indole–chalcone derivative-ligated platinum(IV) prodrugs attenuate cisplatin resistance in lung cancer through ROS/ER stress and mitochondrial dysfunction. J Med Chem 66:4868–4887. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c02036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Komatsu M (2022) p62 bodies: Phase separation, <scp>NRF2</scp> activation, and selective autophagic degradation. IUBMB Life 74:1200–1208. 10.1002/iub.2689 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Shiau J-P, Liu W, Tseng C-H et al (2025) A chalcone/quinolone hybrid drug (COQM) triggers oxidative stress, DNA damage, and apoptosis to induce selective antiproliferative effects in breast cancer cells. Results Chem 15:102268. 10.1016/j.rechem.2025.102268 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Thomé MP, Pereira LC, Onzi GR et al (2019) Dipyridamole impairs autophagic flux and exerts antiproliferative activity on prostate cancer cells. Exp Cell Res 382:111456. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2019.06.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Zhao B, Wang J, Chen L et al (2023) The role of glutamine metabolism in castration-resistant prostate cancer. Asian J Androl. 10.4103/aja2022105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Lu P, Xue J, Ji X (2025) Radiosensitizing effects of Withaferin A in gastric cancer cells via autophagy inhibition and mitochondrial disruption. Sci Rep 15:19695. 10.1038/s41598-025-05008-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Mauthe M, Orhon I, Rocchi C et al (2018) Chloroquine inhibits autophagic flux by decreasing autophagosome-lysosome fusion. Autophagy 14:1435–1455. 10.1080/15548627.2018.1474314 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Ferreira PMP, de Sousa RWR, de Ferreira JR et al (2021) Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine in antitumor therapies based on autophagy-related mechanisms. Pharmacol Res 168:105582. 10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105582 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Ning S, Wang L (2019) The Multifunctional Protein p62 and Its Mechanistic Roles in Cancers. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 19:468–478. 10.2174/1568009618666181016164920 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Lau A, Wang X-J, Zhao F et al (2010) A noncanonical mechanism of Nrf2 activation by autophagy deficiency: direct interaction between keap1 and p62. Mol Cell Biol 30:3275–3285. 10.1128/MCB.00248-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Watanabe Y, Tsujimura A, Taguchi K, Tanaka M (2017) HSF1 stress response pathway regulates autophagy receptor SQSTM1/p62-associated proteostasis. Autophagy 13:133–148. 10.1080/15548627.2016.1248018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Sánchez-Martín P, Komatsu M (2018) p62/SQSTM1 - steering the cell through health and disease. J Cell Sci. 10.1242/jcs.222836 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Joof AN, Bajinka O, Zhou Y et al (2025) The central role of NRF2 in cancer metabolism and redox signaling: novel insights into crosstalk with ER stress and therapeutic modulation. Cell Biochem Biophys 83:4145–4161. 10.1007/s12013-025-01821-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Shubin AV, Demidyuk IV, Komissarov AA et al (2016) Cytoplasmic vacuolization in cell death and survival. Oncotarget 7:55863–55889. 10.18632/oncotarget.10150 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Nedungadi D, Binoy A, Pandurangan N et al (2021) Proteasomal dysfunction and ER stress triggers 2’-hydroxy-retrochalcone-induced paraptosis in cancer cells. Cell Biol Int 45:164–176. 10.1002/cbin.11480 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Wen X, Ma H (2025) Cytoplasmic vacuolization: a fascinating morphological alteration from cellular stress to cell death. Cancer Sci 116:1181–1192. 10.1111/cas.70013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Yoon MJ, Kim EH, Lim JH et al (2010) Superoxide anion and proteasomal dysfunction contribute to curcumin-induced paraptosis of malignant breast cancer cells. Free Radic Biol Med 48:713–726. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2009.12.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Li G-N, Zhao X-J, Wang Z et al (2022) Elaiophylin triggers paraptosis and preferentially kills ovarian cancer drug-resistant cells by inducing MAPK hyperactivation. Signal Transduct Target Ther 7:317. 10.1038/s41392-022-01131-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Ghoneum A, Said N (2019) PI3K-AKT-mTOR and NFκB pathways in ovarian cancer: implications for targeted therapeutics. Cancers (Basel) 11:949. 10.3390/cancers11070949 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Li H, Prever L, Hirsch E, Gulluni F (2021) Targeting PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway in breast cancer. Cancers (Basel). 10.3390/cancers13143517 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Barzegar Behrooz A, Talaie Z, Jusheghani F et al (2022) Wnt and PI3K/Akt/mTOR survival pathways as therapeutic targets in glioblastoma. Int J Mol Sci 23:1353. 10.3390/ijms23031353 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Shorning BY, Dass MS, Smalley MJ, Pearson HB (2020) The PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway and prostate cancer: at the crossroads of AR, MAPK, and WNT signaling. Int J Mol Sci 21:4507. 10.3390/ijms21124507 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Cham J, Venkateswaran AR, Bhangoo M (2021) Targeting the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway in castration resistant prostate cancer: a review article. Clin Genitourin Cancer 19:563.e1-563.e7. 10.1016/j.clgc.2021.07.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Pungsrinont T, Kallenbach J, Baniahmad A (2021) Role of PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway as a pro-survival signaling and resistance-mediating mechanism to therapy of prostate cancer. Int J Mol Sci 22:11088. 10.3390/ijms222011088 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Seyed Karimi M, Faghihkhorasani F, Abdulwahid A-HRR et al (2024) Prostate cancer and PTEN/PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling. In: Prostate cancer: molecular events and therapeutic modalities. Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, pp 169–182
  • 103.Qin X, Jiang B, Zhang Y (2016) 4E-BP1, a multifactor regulated multifunctional protein. Cell Cycle 15:781–786. 10.1080/15384101.2016.1151581 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Wang K, Wang K, Ma Q (2022) The expression and significance of p4E-BP1/4E‐BP1 in prostate cancer. J Clin Lab Anal. 10.1002/jcla.24332 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Glaviano A, Foo ASC, Lam HY et al (2023) PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling transduction pathway and targeted therapies in cancer. Mol Cancer 22:138. 10.1186/s12943-023-01827-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Li S, Zhan Y, Xie Y et al (2020) The impact of icariside II on human prostate cancer cell proliferation, mobility, and autophagy via PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling pathway. Drug Des Devel Ther 14:4169–4178. 10.2147/DDDT.S268524 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Wu H-E, Su C-C, Wang S-C et al (2023) Anticancer effects of morusin in prostate cancer via inhibition of Akt/mTOR signaling pathway. Am J Chin Med 51:1019–1039. 10.1142/S0192415X23500477 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Gan X, Luo X, Chen J et al (2025) Ilicicolin C suppresses the progression of prostate cancer by inhibiting PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. Mol Cell Biochem 480:1089–1104. 10.1007/s11010-024-05026-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Zhitkovich A (2019) N-acetylcysteine: antioxidant, aldehyde scavenger, and more. Chem Res Toxicol 32:1318–1319. 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.9b00152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Kalyanaraman B (2022) NAC, NAC, Knockin’ on Heaven’s door: Interpreting the mechanism of action of N-acetylcysteine in tumor and immune cells. Redox Biol 57:102497. 10.1016/j.redox.2022.102497 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.


Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES