Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Oct 17.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2026 Sep 19;331(5):G489–G503. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00167.2026

The neogenin-hemojuvelin axis in murine liver is crucial for hepcidin expression

Caroline A Enns 1, Shall Jue 1, Bethel Demissu 1, An-Sheng Zhang 1
PMCID: PMC13670174  NIHMSID: NIHMS2212021  PMID: 42873986

Abstract

Neogenin (NEO1) is a ubiquitously expressed, multifunctional receptor that binds hemojuvelin (HJV); both proteins are essential components within hepatocytes for maintaining systemic iron homeostasis. Previous research established that the targeted ablation of hepatic Neo1 or Hjv in mice markedly reduces expression of the central iron-regulatory hormone, hepcidin. Reduction in hepcidin results in unrestricted iron absorption that leads to severe systemic iron overload. Hepatic hepcidin expression is primarily induced via the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling pathway, which requires a complex of plasma membrane proteins, including HJV acting as a BMP co-receptor. However, the precise mechanism by which NEO1 and HJV are orchestrated to robustly activate this pathway remains poorly understood. In this study, we systemically investigated the mechanisms by which hepatic Neo1 coordinates with Hjv to facilitate hepcidin induction using various knockout mouse models. Our data indicate that while Hjv is a more potent inducer of hepcidin than hepatic Neo1, the simultaneous ablation of both Neo1 and Hjv greatly reduces hepcidin expression. These results suggest that these two proteins form a crucial functional axis for controlling hepcidin levels. Further analysis revealed that approximately 84% of hepcidin expression relies on the synergistic association of Neo1 with Hjv. In comparison, Hjv retains a significantly compromised (~12%) ability to induce hepcidin independently of Neo1, while Neo1 possesses only a residual (~3%) independent induction capacity. Collectively, these data support a model in which hepatic Neo1 acts primarily as a molecular scaffold to facilitate assembly of the hepcidin-inducing signaling complex through Hjv.

Keywords: liver, iron homeostasis, hepcidin, neogenin, hemojuvelin

New & Noteworthy

Hepcidin expression in hepatocytes relies on a multi-protein plasma membrane complex. This study establishes a critical functional axis between neogenin and hemojuvelin within this complex, revealing how their coordination is essential for systemic iron homeostasis. Our findings provide a new mechanistic framework for understanding the assembly of the hepcidin-signaling complex.

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-2212021-f0001.webp

INTRODUCTION

Iron is an essential element for life, serving as the active center for proteins involved in oxygen transport, energy metabolism, and DNA synthesis (1). However, iron is also toxic in excess. Because mammals lack a regulated physiological pathway to excrete excess iron, systemic iron homeostasis is maintained through the coordinated regulation of duodenal absorption, macrophage recycling of senescent erythrocytes, and the mobilization of hepatic iron stores (2, 3). This balance is primarily governed by hepcidin, a 25-amino acid peptide hormone predominantly secreted by hepatocytes and encoded by the HAMP gene in humans and the Hamp gene in mice. Hepcidin controls iron efflux into the circulation by blocking ferroportin, the only known iron exporter, on duodenal epithelial cells, macrophages, and hepatocytes (Supplemental Figure S1A) (4, 5). Consequently, hepcidin deficiency causes juvenile hemochromatosis, a severe iron overload disorder (6, 7), whereas inappropriately high hepcidin levels lead to iron-deficiency anemia (2, 3). Under physiological conditions, hepcidin expression is tightly regulated via a classical endocrine feedback loop: elevated systemic iron levels stimulate hepcidin production to limit further iron absorption, whereas low iron levels suppress hepcidin expression to increase plasma iron availability (2).

Hepatic hepcidin expression is primarily induced through the canonical bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling pathway (8–10). This process is initiated by BMP ligands binding to type-I and type-II receptors, triggering a phosphorylation cascade that activates receptor-associated SMADs (SMAD1/5/8). These phosphorylated SMADs form heteromeric complexes with SMAD4 and translocate to the nucleus to induce target gene transcription (11). Animal models show that hepcidin expression specifically utilizes ligands (BMP2 and BMP6) derived from liver sinusoidal endothelial cells, alongside receptors ALK2, ALK3, ActRIIA, and BMPR2, and the SMAD1/4/5/8 signaling proteins (Supplemental Figure S1B) (8–10, 12–22). However, an intact BMP-signaling pathway alone is insufficient to maintain physiological hepcidin levels. Normal hepcidin expression also requires a suite of plasma membrane proteins, including neogenin (NEO1 for human; Neo1 for mouse), hemojuvelin (HJV for human; Hjv for mouse), hemochromatosis protein (HFE for human; Hfe for mouse), and transferrin receptor-2 (TfR2 for human; Tfr2 for mouse) in hepatocytes (2, 23, 24). In mice, the global or hepatocyte-specific ablation of any one of these genes reduces hepcidin and results in iron overload (24–29). Similarly, mutations in human HJV, HFE, or TfR2 also reduces hepcidin leading to hemochromatosis (7, 23, 30). Although earlier studies (24, 31–38) suggest that these components act as a membrane-bound complex to facilitate BMP-mediated hepcidin expression, their precise orchestration remains poorly understood.

NEO1 is a ubiquitously expressed, multifunctional receptor composed of four immunoglobulin-like domains, six fibronectin III domains, a single-pass transmembrane domain, and an intracellular domain (ICD) (39). It binds members of the repulsive guidance molecule (RGM) family, including RGMa, RGMb, and HJV, specifically via its fibronectin III subdomains 5–6 (Supplemental Figure S1C) (31–33, 40–44). These ligands are all glycosylphosphatidylinositol-linked membrane proteins (41, 45). While RGMa and RGMb are primarily expressed in the developing nervous system and are necessary for neural development (46), HJV is predominantly expressed in hepatocytes, skeletal muscle cells, and cardiomyocytes (30, 47–49). Notably, tissue-specific knockout studies demonstrate that only hepatic Hjv is essential for hepcidin expression and systemic iron homeostasis (25, 26). HJV can simultaneously bind NEO1 via its C-terminal portion and BMP ligands (or the receptor ALK3) via its N-terminal portion, with overlapping binding surface for BMP and the ALK3 ectodomain (32, 33). Although the precise mechanism remains elusive, HJV is proposed to act as a co-receptor for BMP6, utilizing ALK2 and ALK3 to robustly stimulate the BMP-signaling pathway (9, 12, 18, 19, 50). Recent evidence suggests that hepcidin induction by Hjv is critically dependent on its interaction with Neo1 (24, 31); specifically, mutations in the Hjv-Neo1 binding surface (e.g., alanine-183 in murine Hjv or leucine-1046 in murine Neo1) markedly impair hepcidin expression (24, 31, 33). Consistently, hepatocyte-specific ablation of Neo1 in mice also decreases hepcidin expression and causes iron overload (24). While earlier studies suggest that hepatocyte Neo1 acts as a scaffold to integrate hepcidin-inducing proteins into functional complexes (31), the relative contributions of hepatic Neo1 and Hjv, and the extent to which Hjv-mediated induction depends on its physical association with Neo1, remain to be determined.

NEO1 undergoes sequential proteolytic processing, beginning with extracellular α-secretase cleavage adjacent to the transmembrane domain, followed by γ-secretase within the membrane (Supplemental Figure S1D) (40, 51–53). In neurons, α-secretase cleavage of Neo1 ectodomain is reported to terminate the RGMa-induced Neo1 signaling (51). Conversely, γ-secretase cleavage releases the NEO1-intracellular domain, which translocates to the nucleus to upregulate target gene transcription in the presence of RGMa in HEK293 and MFC7 cells (52). Similarly, in zebrafish, RGMa promotes γ-secretase proteolysis of Neo1, and overexpression of Neo1-intracellular domain partially rescues developmental defects in Neo1/RGMa knockdown embryos (53). Interestingly, our previous studies indicate that Hjv-mediated hepcidin expression is associated with increased levels of a γ-secretase-cleaved, membrane-associated form of Neo1 (comprising the ectodomain and transmembrane domain; Neo1-ECD/TMD) in the liver (Supplemental Figure S1E). These findings suggest that the Neo1-mediated hepcidin induction is initiated by the full-length protein and requires de novo γ-secretase cleavage of the cytoplasmic domain (24, 37). However, while hepatocyte Neo1 ablation reduces hepcidin expression (24), whether Neo1 can induce hepcidin independently of Hjv remains unknown.

In this study, we systemically investigated the mechanism by which hepatic Neo1 coordinates with Hjv to induce hepcidin. Using single- and double-mutant mouse models on a uniform genetic background, we tested the hypothesis that Neo1 and Hjv constitute an essential regulatory axis for hepcidin induction. Our results demonstrate that Hjv is a more potent inducer of hepcidin than hepatic Neo1, and that the concurrent ablation of both genes greatly reduces hepcidin expression. Notably, we found that ~84% of Hjv-mediated hepcidin induction is dependent on its physical association with Neo1. While hepatic Hjv retains a modest ability to induce hepcidin independently, our data suggest that hepatic Neo1 possesses only residual capacity in the absence of Hjv.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

cDNA constructs.

Murine Neo1 ORF (NM_008684) and murine deleted in colorectal cancer (Dcc) ORF (NM_007831), each containing a C-terminal FLAG/MYC epitope (fNeo1 and fDcc, respectively), were purchased in pCMV6 vectors (#MR226235 and #MR226661; OriGene Technologies). Sequence integrity was validated by DNA sequencing. The fDcc construct was subcloned into an AAV8 construct containing a strong liver-specific promoter, as described previously (54). This promoter consists of two copies of the human α1-microglobulin/bikunin enhancer combined with the promoter from the human thyroid hormone-binding globulin gene. AAV8 constructs containing N-terminal 3xFLAG-tagged Hjv (fHjv) or the fHjvA183R mutant were generated previously (31). All AAV8 viral vectors were produced at the Molecular Virology Support Core, OHSU.

Animal studies.

All animal procedures were approved by OHSU/Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Homozygous hepatocyte-specific Neo1−/− mice (Neo1fl/fl;Alb-Cre+) on a C57BL/6J background were generated in our previous studies (24). Global Hjv−/− mice on a 129/SvEvTac (129/S) background were obtained from Dr. Nancy Andrews (Duke University), and Hjv−/− mice on a C57BL/6J background were generated via backcrossing for ten generations. To obtain experimental groups, Neo1-Hjv double-mutant (Neo1fl/fl;Alb-Cre+;Hjv−/−), Neo1 single-mutant (Neo1fl/fl;Alb-Cre+;Hjv+/+), Hjv single-mutant (Neo1fl/fl;Alb-Cre−;Hjv−/−), and wild-type (Neo1fl/fl;Alb-Cre−;Hjv+/+) littermates were generated by crossing Neo1fl/fl;Alb-Cre−/−;Hjv−/− male with Neo1fl/fl;Alb-Cre+/−;Hjv+/+ female on a uniform C57BL/6J background. All mice were fed a PicoLab Laboratory Rodent Diet-5L0D containing 240-ppm iron (LabDiet). Mice of both genders were euthanized for analysis at the ages indicated in the figure legends.

To evaluate the function of the fHjvA183R mutant, eight-week-old Hjv−/− male mice (129/S background) were intraperitoneally injected with sterile PBS, AAV8-fHjv, or fHjvA183R at doses of ~5× 1011 and/or ~1013 genome-particles per mouse. To study the function of Dcc, eight-week-old Neo1−/− male mice (C57BL/6J background) were intraperitoneally injected with sterile PBS or AAV8-fDcc at ~0.29× 1012 or ~1.35×1012 genome-particles per mouse. All mice were euthanized for analysis three weeks post-administration. Blood was collected via cardiac puncture for serum iron assays. Livers were rapidly removed, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80°C for qRT-PCR and western blot analysis. Age- and gender-matched wild-type, Hjv−/−, and Neo1−/− mice were included as additional controls.

Blood parameters and serum iron assays.

Blood parameters were analyzed using a Hemavet 950 automated analyzer (Drew Scientific). Serum iron concentrations were measured using the Pointe Iron/TIBC Reagent Set (Pointe Scientific).

Tissue nonheme iron assays.

Tissue nonheme iron levels were determined as previously described (49) with the following modifications: 50–150 mg of wet tissue was digested in 250–750 μL of acid buffer at 65°C for 72 hrs. The supernatant was collected by centrifugation at 10,000 x g for 5 min, followed by the addition of chromogen (1.86 mM bathophenanthroline sulfonate and 143 mM thioglycolic acid in water). Absorbance was measured at 535 nm using an xMark Microplate Spectrophotometer (Bio-Rad). Each sample was analyzed in triplicate. Iron concentrations are expressed as micrograms of iron per gram (μg/g) of wet tissue.

qRT-PCR.

Total RNA was extracted from mouse liver tissues using a NucleoSpin RNA kit (Macherey-Nagel). cDNA was synthesized using Oligo deoxythymidine primers (Invitrogen) and M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen). qRT-PCR analysis of Neo1, Hjv, Hamp (hepcidin), Id1, Dcc, IL-6, and β-actin transcripts was performed in triplicates for each sample using Power SYBR Green PCR master mix (Applied Biosystems) on a QuantStudio 7 Flex qPCR instrument (ThermoFisher) at the OHSU Integrated Genomics Laboratory. All primer sets (Supplemental Tables S1) were validated against the reference gene (β-actin) to ensure comparable amplification efficiencies. Results are expressed as mRNA levels relative to β-actin for each sample.

Cell line and transfection.

Hep3B cells were obtained from ATCC (#HB-8064). Cells were transiently transfected with pCMV6-fDcc, pCMV6-fNeo1, or an empty vector using Lipofectamine-3000 (Invitrogen) to assess the cell surface localization of fDcc via biotinylation and α/γ-secretase cleavage using specific inhibitors. The inhibitors used in the studies include α-secretase inhibitor, Aderbasib (INCB007839; #HY-10293; MedChemExpress); γ-secretase inhibitors, DAPT (D5942; Sigma-Aldrich) and LY450139 (SML1938; Sigma-Aldrich); and proteasome inhibitor, MG132 (#47490; EMO Millipore Corp). Biotinylation of cell surface proteins was performed on ice. Approximately 64 h post-transfection, Hep3B cells were washed three times with ice-cold PBS+ buffer (PBS supplemented with 0.5 mm CaCl2 and 1 mm MgCl2) and incubated with 0.25 mg/ml EZ-Link Sulfo-NHS-SS-Biotin (Thermo Fisher Scientific) in PBS+ buffer for 30 min. The reaction was quenched by washing the cells five-times with ice-cold PBS+ buffer containing 0.1% glycine (pH 7.6). Cells were solubilized, and the resulting lysate was cleared by centrifugation at 16,000 x g for 5 min. Biotinylated proteins were isolated using streptavidin resin (G Biosciences), eluted with 1x Laemmli buffer, and subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunodetection using antibodies against NEO1, Dcc, FLAG, Na+K+ ATPase, and β-actin.

To detect α-secretase-cleaved fDcc or fNeo1 ectodomains in the conditioned medium, the complete medium (MEM/10% FBS) was replaced with Opti-MEM/1% FBS at 46 h post-transfection. Cells were then incubated in the presence or absence of 25 μM Aderbasib for an additional 18 h prior to collection. Proteins in ~600 μL of conditioned medium were precipitated using 6% TCA, and the resulting protein pellets were resuspended in 1x Laemmli buffer for SDS-PAGE and immunodetection. To detect γ-secretase-cleaved fDcc-intracellular domain (fDcc-ICD), Hep3B cells were transiently transfected with the pCMV6-fDcc construct. At approximately 63 h post-transfection, cells were incubated with 10 μM MG-132 and 10 μM DAPT or 10 μM LY450139 for 7 h. Approximately 90% of the cell lysate was subjected to pull-down using anti-FLAG affinity gel (Sigma #A2220), followed by elution using the 3xFLAG peptide at ~200 μg/ml (Sigma F4799). The eluted proteins and ~10% of the input lysate were then subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunodetection using specific antibodies.

Immunodetection.

Liver membrane fractions were prepared as previously described (55). Protein extracts (~200 μg) from the liver membrane preparations were separated via SDS-PAGE (11%) under reducing conditions. Endogenous Neo1 and β-actin were detected by using rabbit anti-human NEO1-ectodomain (40), mouse anti-β-actin (Sigma), and the corresponding secondary antibodies. Transduced fHjv and fHjvA183R were detected using an HRP-coupled mouse anti-FLAG M2 IgG (Sigma). Transduced fDcc was detected using a goat anti-mouse Dcc antibody (#AF844; R&D Systems) and donkey anti-goat IgG Alexa Fluor Plus 680 (Invitrogen). All images were captured by using the c600 western blot imaging system (Azure Biosystems, Inc). The intensities of specific bands were quantified by using the ImageJ software. Protein levels are expressed relative to β-actin.

Statistical analysis.

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 11. For multiple comparisons, one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test was used. A two-tailed t-test was used to compare two data sets. All data are presented as mean ± SD. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Hjv is a more potent inducer of hepcidin expression than hepatic Neo1.

The genetic background of mice significantly impacts systemic iron load (56, 57). To determine the relative contributions of hepatic Neo1 and Hjv to hepcidin expression, we utilized hepatocyte-specific Neo1−/− (Neo1fl/fl;Alb-Cre+;Hjv+/+) and global Hjv−/− (Neo1fl/fl;Alb-Cre−;Hjv−/−) mice on a uniform C57BL/6J background to avoid confounding genetic background effects. Hepatic hepcidin (Hamp) mRNA levels in eight-week-old mice of both genders were analyzed via qRT-PCR analysis and compared to age-matched wild-type (Neo1fl/fl;Alb-Cre−;Hjv+/+) controls. Earlier studies showed no sex-related differences in hepatic Hamp mRNA levels in mice on a C57BL/6J background (58). As expected, significant decreases in Neo1 and Hjv mRNA levels confirmed successful knockout in the respective models (Figure 1A/B). In the liver, Hjv is predominantly expressed in hepatocytes, whereas Neo1 is found in both hepatocytes and non-parenchymal cells (47, 48). The modest Neo1 mRNA levels detected in the liver of Neo1−/− mice (Figure 1A) likely originate from these nonparenchymal cells. Consistent with previous studies (24, 48, 49), qRT-PCR analysis revealed that Hamp mRNA levels were significantly reduced in both Neo1−/− and Hjv−/− mice compared with wild-type controls (Figure 1C). Notably, Hjv−/− mice exhibited a more pronounced reduction than Neo1−/− mice, retaining approximately 3.53% and 15.71% of the Hamp mRNA levels observed in wild-type controls, respectively (Figure 1C). These results suggest that Hjv is a more potent inducer of hepcidin expression than hepatic Neo1.

Figure 1. Hjv is a more potent inducer of hepcidin expression than hepatic Neo1.

Figure 1.

A-D) qRT-PCR analysis of hepatic Neo1, Hjv, Hamp, and Id1 mRNA levels in 8-weeks-old wild-type (Neo1fl/fl;Alb-Cre−;Hjv+/+; n=14; 7 male, 7 female), hepatic Neo1−/− (Neo1fl/fl;Alb-Cre+;Hjv+/+; n=15; 7 male, 8 female), and Hjv−/− (Neo1fl/fl;Alb-Cre−;Hjv−/−; n=22; 11 male, 11 female) mice on a C57BL/6J background. Results are expressed relative to β-actin mRNA levels for each sample. E) Serum iron concentrations. F) Liver nonheme iron concentrations. All data are presented as mean ± SD. One-way ANOVA was used to analyze the data across the three groups. ***, p<0.001; ****, p<0.0001.

As expected, reduced hepcidin expression in Neo1−/− and Hjv−/− mice resulted from impaired Bmp-signaling, as evidenced by a parallel decrease in hepatic Inhibitor of DNA binding-1 (Id1) mRNA (Figure 1D). Id1 is a direct downstream target and a sensitive indicator of Bmp signaling status. Because hepatic Hamp mRNA levels correlate closely with serum hepcidin concentrations (59–61), this reduction caused severe systemic iron overload in both knockout models (Figure 1E/F). This manifests as marked increases in serum iron concentrations and liver nonheme iron levels, the latter of which serves as a reliable indicator of total body iron stores. Mechanistically, low hepcidin promotes iron efflux into the circulation through ferroportin in the duodenum. Although the difference in liver nonheme iron accumulation between Neo1−/− and Hjv−/− mice was not statistically significant, the latter showed a greater accumulation relative to wild-type controls (8.7-fold vs 9.98-fold increase; Figure 1F). These findings align with the more pronounced reduction in Hamp mRNA observed in Hjv−/− mice (Figure 1C).

Given that hepatic hepcidin expression relies heavily on the Neo1-Hjv interaction (24, 31) and that Neo1−/− and Hjv−/− mice displayed respective decreases of approximately 84.29% and 96.47% of hepatic Hamp mRNA levels, respectively (Figure 1C), our results suggest that this Neo1-Hjv association accounts for approximately 84% of total expression. The remaining ~12% of Hjv-mediated hepcidin induction (reflecting the difference between 84.29% and 96.47%) likely proceeds through a Neo1-independent pathway.

Neogenin and hemojuvelin in murine liver constitute a crucial axis to induce hepcidin expression, acting primarily through their interaction.

To investigate the extent to which Hjv and Neo1 induce hepcidin independently, we generated hepatic Neo1-Hjv double-mutant mice (Neo1fl/fl;Alb-Cre+;Hjv−/−; hereafter Neo1−/−;Hjv−/−) on a C57BL/6J background. At eight weeks of age, these mice showed no visible phenotypic abnormalities or changes in body weight compared with their wild-type counterparts (Supplemental Figure S2A). We reasoned that if combined hepatic Neo1 and Hjv ablation further reduced hepatic hepcidin expression compared to Hjv−/− mice, it would indicate that both Hjv and hepatic Neo1 possess distinct mechanisms for inducing hepcidin that are independently of their physical interaction.

Hepatic Hamp mRNA levels and body iron load were analyzed in eight-week-old mice of both sexes and compared with age, sex, and background-matched wild-type, Neo1−/−, and Hjv−/− animals. Simultaneous ablation of both hepatic Neo1 and Hjv resulted in a further reduction in Hamp mRNA compared to Hjv−/− mice (Figure 2A–C). Notably, the dual deficiency of hepatic Neo1 and Hjv resulted in a ~99.70% reduction in hepatic Hamp mRNA levels, representing a nearly complete abolition of expression. These results suggest that hepatic Neo1 retains a Hjv-independent mechanism to induce hepcidin expression, albeit to a limited extent (~3.23%). This is calculated from the difference between ~3.53% in Hjv−/− mice and ~0.30% in Neo1−/−;Hjv−/− mice (Figure 2C). Additionally, a slight but non-significant reduction in hepatic Id1 mRNA levels was observed in Neo1−/−;Hjv−/− mice relative to Hjv−/− mice (Figure 2D), raising the possibility that this Neo1-induced hepcidin expression may also be mediated through the Bmp signaling pathway.

Figure 2. Hepatic Neo1 and Hjv constitute a crucial axis for inducing hepcidin expression.

Figure 2.

A-D) qRT-PCR analysis of hepatic Neo1, Hjv, Hamp, and Id1 mRNA levels in 8-weeks-old wild-type (Neo1fl/fl;Alb-Cre−;Hjv+/+; n=14; 7 male, 7 female), hepatic Neo1−/− (Neo1fl/fl;Alb-Cre+;Hjv+/+; n=15; 7 male, 8 female), Hjv−/− (Neo1fl/fl;Alb-Cre−;Hjv−/−; n=22; 11 male, 11 female), and double-mutant Neo1−/−;Hjv−/− (Neo1fl/fl;Alb-Cre+;Hjv−/−; n=32; 16 male, 16 female) mice on a C57BL/6J background. The wild-type, hepatic Neo1−/−, and Hjv−/− mice are the same as described in Figure 1. Results are expressed relative to β-actin mRNA levels for each sample. E) Serum iron concentrations. F-H) Liver, pancreas, and heart nonheme iron concentrations. All data are presented as mean ± SD. One-way ANOVA was used to analyze the data across the four groups. *, p<0.05; **, p<0.01; ****, p<0.0001.

Elevated body iron load typically causes progressive iron deposition in the pancreas and heart, in addition to the liver (48, 49). Consistent with the lower Hamp mRNA levels in Neo1−/−;Hjv−/− mice, we detected trending increases in liver nonheme iron levels and significant elevations in iron accumulation in the pancreas and heart compared to single-mutant counterparts (Figure 2F–H). Since the majority of the body iron is found in the hemoglobin of red blood cells (2), we measured hematological parameters and detected significant increases in hemoglobin, hematocrit, and mean corpuscular volume in Neo1−/−;Hjv−/− mice (Supplemental Figure S2B-E). These results rule out the possibility that the elevated tissue iron load in Neo1−/−;Hjv−/− mice is due to impaired iron utilization for erythropoiesis; rather, the elevated erythroid parameters are likely derived from an increased systemic iron supply.

Taken together, the above data suggest that the hepatic Neo1/Hjv axis accounts for approximately 99% of hepcidin expression. Within this axis, ~84% of hepcidin expression is specifically attributable to the Neo1-Hjv interaction, while approximately 12% and 3% of hepcidin expression are likely derived from Hjv- and Neo1-specific pathways, respectively, acting independently of their interaction.

Overexpression of HjvA183R, which does not bind Neo1, indicates that Hjv can induce hepcidin independently of Neo1 association.

To gain insight into the mechanism by which Hjv induces hepcidin independently of Neo1, we compared the effects of Hjv and its mutant, HjvA183R, on hepcidin expression and Neo1 levels in Hjv−/− mice. The alanine-to-arginine substitution at residue-183 in murine Hjv disrupts the Hjv-Neo1 interaction without affecting Hjv trafficking to the plasma membrane in transfected cells (Figure 3A) (31, 33). Because no commercial antibody can sensitively detect endogenous Hjv in murine liver, a FLAG epitope was engineered onto the N-terminus of Hjv and HjvA183R constructs (fHjv and fHjvA183R; Figure 3B) for immunodetection. The addition of the N-terminal FLAG tag does not interfere with Hjv-mediated induction of hepcidin (24, 31). Both fHjv and fHjvA183R were expressed in the livers of Hjv−/− mice via an AAV8 viral vector under a hepatocyte-specific promoter. Previous studies demonstrated that AAV8-mediated transduction results in hepatocyte-specific expression with a homogeneous distribution throughout the liver, similar to native Neo1 and Hjv mRNA (47, 62, 63). Administration of the AAV8 vector alone had no effect on iron homeostasis (64, 65).

Figure 3. Induction of hepcidin expression by fHjvA183R is not associated with increases in hepatic Neo1-ECD/TMD.

Figure 3.

A) Schematic showing that the HjvA183R mutant does not interact with Neo1. B) Diagram showing the engineering of a FLAG epitope (F) to the N-terminus of Hjv and HjvA183R. C) qRT-PCR analysis of hepatic Hjv mRNA levels in wild-type (WT) male mice and in Hjv−/− (Hjv KO) male mice after intraperitoneal injection with AAV8-fHjv or AAV8-fHjvA183R viral vectors at ~5× 1011 (+) and/or ~1013 (++) genome-particles per mouse. Each group consists of at least 4 mice. Results are expressed relative to β-actin mRNA levels for each sample. The relative fold levels compared to endogenously expressed Hjv mRNA in wild-type mice are also presented. D) qRT-PCR analysis of hepatic Hamp mRNA levels. E) Representative images of western blot analysis for Neo1, fHjv, fHjvA183R, and β-actin in the liver membrane preparation (200 μg protein) of the mice above by sequential blotting with specific antibodies. F) Quantification of fHjv and fHjvA183R bands in E (panel-2). The relative amounts to β-actin are presented. G-H) qRT-PCR analysis of hepatic IL-6 and Id1 mRNA levels. I) Serum iron concentrations. J) Schematic showing the targeting domains for the anti-NEO1 antibody and the structure of Neo1-ECD/TMD. K) Quantification of Neo1 bands in E (top panel). The relative amounts to β-actin are presented. All data are presented as mean ± SD. One-way ANOVA was used to analyze the data across the five groups. ns, no statistical difference; *, p<0.05; **, p<0.01; ***, p<0.001; ****, p<0.0001.

Consistent with our earlier observations (31), expressing fHjv mRNA at levels comparable to those of endogenous Hjv mRNA in wild-type mice (Figure 3C) fully corrected low Hamp mRNA levels in Hjv−/− mice (Figure 3D). In contrast, expression of similar levels of fHjvA183R mRNA resulted in only a modest increase (~15%) of Hamp mRNA relative to fHjv (Figure 3C/D). However, a full correction of hepcidin expression was achieved when fHjvA183R was overexpressed at ~30.62-fold higher mRNA levels than those in wild-type mice and ~24.15-fold higher protein levels than fHjv (Figure 3C–F). The relatively faster migration of fHjvA183R in immunoblots (Figure 3E; lanes 7–9 versus 10–15) is likely due to changes in charge caused by the amino acid substitution, as previously reported for TfR1T104D mutant (66). The lack of changes in IL-6 mRNA levels ruled out inflammation as a cause for this increase (Figure 3G). Instead, parallel increases in Id1 mRNA levels suggest that hepcidin induction occurred via the Bmp-signaling pathway, consistent with fHjv (Figure 3H). As predicted, the increased hepcidin expression following fHjvA183R overexpression reduced serum iron concentrations (Figure 3I). Together, these observations suggest that in the absence of Neo1 association, Hjv can still induce hepcidin expression via the Bmp-signaling pathway, though with significantly reduced efficiency.

We next tested whether hepcidin induction by fHjvA183R overexpression correlates with increased levels of membrane-associated Neo1-ECD/TMD in the liver, similar to wild-type fHjv. In agreement with earlier studies (24), two distinct Neo1 bands were detected in liver membrane preparations from wild-type mice using an antibody against the human NEO1 ectodomain (Figure 3E; top panel, lanes 1–3). The upper band represents full-length Neo1 (Neo1), while the lower band corresponds to Neo1-ECD/TMD, likely derived from γ-secretase cleavage (Figure 3J) (37). Ablation of Hjv led to a marked decrease in hepatic Hamp mRNA and Neo1-ECD/TMD levels (Figure 3C/D; Figure 3E, top panel, lanes 4–6; Figure 3K). Lack of Hjv does not alter hepatic Neo1 mRNA levels (24). However, in contrast to the full restoration of Hamp mRNA levels and the substantial normalization of Neo1-ECD/TMD levels in Hjv−/− mice via fHjv expression, overexpression of fHjvA183R rescued Hamp mRNA expression but failed to alter Neo1-ECD/TMD levels (Figure 3C/D; Figure 3E, top panel, lanes 7–9 vs 13–15; Figure 3K). This could be due to the disrupted interaction between fHjvA183R and Neo1. The relatively faint β-actin bands for the high fHjvA183R group (Figure 3E; lowest panel; lanes 13–15) were likely due to the interference from strong fHjvA183R signals, which were detected by an HRP-conjugated anti-FLAG antibody prior to β-actin detection. Taken together, these data suggest that Hjv can induce hepcidin expression through both Neo1-dependent and Neo1-independent mechanisms, both of which facilitate the Bmp-signaling pathway. However, the latter is significantly less efficient.

Studies of Hjv heterozygous mice indicate that Hjv induces hepcidin expression with low efficacy in the absence of hepatic Neo1.

Although the Neo1-independent pathway is less efficient, its low efficacy underscores the importance of the Neo1-Hjv interaction for optimal hepcidin expression. Previous studies have shown that Hjv+/− mice are indistinguishable from wild-type mice regarding hepcidin expression and body iron levels (48, 49), suggesting that Hjv is not a limiting factor when hepatic Neo1 is present. We next compared hepatic Hamp mRNA levels between Neo1−/−;Hjv+/− and Neo1−/−;Hjv+/+ mice, both of which lack hepatic Neo1. We reasoned that if Hjv heterozygosity further reduces the already low hepcidin expression in these mice, it would support a critical role for hepatic Neo1 in facilitating Hjv function.

Eight-week-old mice of both genders on a C57BL/6J background were analyzed. Consistent with earlier observations (48, 49), deletion of a single copy of the Hjv allele in Neo1+/+;Hjv+/− mice had no significant impact on Hamp mRNA, Id1 mRNA, serum and tissue iron levels, or red blood cell parameters (Figure 4A–L). However, in the absence of hepatic Neo1, the heterozygous mutation of Hjv (Neo1−/−;Hjv+/−) resulted in a ~4.6-fold reduction in hepatic Hamp mRNA levels compared to Neo1−/−;Hjv+/+ counterparts (Figure 4A–C; Supplemental Figure S3). The approximate 10.8% of decrease in Id1 mRNA in Neo1−/−;Hjv+/− mice versus Neo1−/−;Hjv+/+ mice (reflecting the difference between 42.4% and 53.2%; Figure 4D) suggests that this reduction in Hamp mRNA resulted from impaired Bmp signaling. The lack of a statistically significant difference in Id1 mRNA levels between Neo1−/−;Hjv+/− and Neo1−/−;Hjv+/+ mice (Figure 4D) could be attributed to the sensitivity limit of qRT-PCR. In line with the modest decrease in Hamp mRNA, we detected a trend toward increased liver nonheme iron, alongside significant increases in pancreatic and cardiac iron in Neo1−/−;Hjv+/− mice (Figure 4F–H). The lack of change in hemoglobin, hematocrit, and mean corpuscular volume in these mice (Figure 4J–L) indicates no impairment of iron utilization for erythropoiesis. Additionally, comparable decreases in hepatic Hamp mRNA were detected in 5-week-old Neo1−/−;Hjv+/− mice compared to their corresponding Neo1−/−;Hjv+/+ controls, but not between 5-week-old Neo1+/+;Hjv+/− and Neo1+/+;Hjv+/+ mice (Supplemental Figure S4). Together, these data indicate that in the absence of hepatic Neo1, Hjv becomes a limiting factor for hepcidin induction, suggesting that hepatic Neo1 deficiency markedly impairs the efficacy of Hjv-mediated hepcidin expression.

Figure 4. Ablation of hepatic Neo1 greatly attenuates Hjv-mediated induction of hepcidin expression.

Figure 4.

A-D) qRT-PCR analysis of hepatic Hjv, Neo1, Hamp and Id1 mRNA levels in 8-weeks-old wild-type Neo1+/+;Hjv+/+ (Neo1fl/fl;Alb-Cre−;Hjv+/+; n=14; 7 male, 7 female), Neo1+/+;Hjv+/− (Neo1fl/fl;Alb-Cre−;Hjv+/−; n=29; 15 male, 14 female), Neo1−/−;Hjv+/+ (Neo1fl/fl;Alb-Cre+;Hjv+/+; n=15; 7 male, 8 female), and Neo1−/−;Hjv+/− (Neo1fl/fl;Alb-Cre+;Hjv+/−; n=31; 16 male, 15 female) mice on a C57BL/6J background. Results are expressed relative to β-actin mRNA levels for each sample. E) Serum iron concentrations. F-H) Liver, pancreas, and heart nonheme iron concentrations. I-L) Blood parameters: red blood cell (RBC) count, hemoglobin (Hb), hematocrit (HCT), and mean corpuscular volume (MCV). All data are presented as mean ± SD. One-way ANOVA was used to analyze the data across the four groups. ns, no statistical difference; *, p<0.05; **, p<0.01; ***, p<0.001; ****, p<0.0001.

Overexpression studies of the Neo1 homologue, Dcc, imply that hepatic Neo1 retains residual hepcidin-inducing activity independent of Hjv.

To determine whether hepatic Neo1 possesses any residual ability to induce hepcidin expression independent of Hjv, we initially attempted to overexpress the Neo1L1046E mutant, which disrupts the Hjv-binding site (33), in Neo1−/− mice. However, the Neo1 coding sequence approached the packaging limit of the AAV8 vector, preventing the generation of sufficient AAV8 viral titers. To circumvent this, we utilized murine Dcc (Figure 5A). Dcc is a Neo1 homologue with ~1000-fold lower binding affinity for Hjv (33); it is smaller (1447 versus 1492 amino acids) and shares ~69% amino acid sequence similarity with Neo1. While endogenous Dcc expression is predominantly restricted to the developing central nervous system (67, 68), it shares similar domain structures and post-translational processing with Neo1 (69, 70).

Figure 5. Dcc traffics to the plasma membrane and undergoes α- and γ-secretase-mediated proteolysis.

Figure 5.

A) Schematic diagram of Dcc and FLAG/MYC-tagged Dcc (fDcc), including the antibodies and the inhibitors used. f = FLAG tag. m = MYC tag. B) Western blot analysis of fDcc, fNeo1, Na+K+-ATPase, and β-actin in lysate input (10%), biotinylated cell surface protein eluate (~90% total lysate), and concentrated conditioned medium (CM; ~600 μl) from transfected Hep3B cells. Cells were transiently transfected with pCMV6-fDcc, pCMV6-fNeo1, or an empty vector. Cell surface proteins were biotinylated following 18 hr incubation with 25 μM Aderbasib (α-secretase inhibitor) and 10 μM LY450139 (γ-secretase inhibitor). C) Incubation with γ-secretase inhibitors LY450139 or DAPT reduces release of fDcc-ICD. Transfected Hep3B cells were incubated with 10 μM MG-132 and either 10 μM LY450139 or 10 μM DAPT for 7 hr. About 90% of cell lysate was subjected to pull-down using anti-FLAG affinity gel. Eluted proteins and 10% input lysate were subjected to SDS-PAGE (11%) and immunodetection. All experiments were repeated at least three times with consistent results.

A FLAG/MYC epitope was engineered onto the C-terminus of the Dcc construct (fDcc) due to the lack of a suitable antibody for the intracellular portion of Dcc. Adding a similar epitope to the C-terminus of Neo1 (fNeo1) has previously been shown not to affect its induction of hepcidin (24). When expressed in Hep3B cells (a human hepatoma cell line), fDcc trafficked to the plasma membrane, as confirmed by cell-surface biotinylation on ice and the subsequent pulldown of biotinylated proteins using streptavidin beads (Figure 5B; panels 1–3; lane 13–18). The western blot images were obtained by sequential probing with anti-mouse Dcc ectodomain, anti-human NEO1 ectodomain, and anti-FLAG epitope antibodies. The enrichment of Na+K+ ATPase and the absence of detectable β-actin in biotinylated fractions confirmed that only plasma membrane proteins were labeled (Figure 5B; panel 4/5). Consistent with earlier studies (70) and similar to Neo1 (37), the ectodomain of Dcc underwent active shedding, which was largely inhibited by the α-secretase inhibitor Aderbasib (Figure 5A; 5B; panel 6; lane 4–7). Dcc is also subjected to γ-secretase cleavage within its transmembrane domain, releasing the Dcc-intracellular domain (Dcc-ICD) into the cytosol (70). In the presense of the proteasomal inhibitor MG-132, released fDcc-ICDs were detectable in cell extracts via anti-FLAG antibody; this signal was largely abolished by the γ-secretase inhibitors LY450139 and DAPT (Figure 5C; panel 2; lane 8–11). These data indicate that Dcc undergoes post-translational processing in hepatoma cells in a manner similar to that of fNeo1 (37), suggesting that Dcc could serve as a model to study Neo1 function.

To investigate its biological function in vivo, we expressed fDcc at two different levels in the livers of Neo1−/− mice via intraperitoneal administration of an AAV8-fDcc viral vector. qRT-PCR analysis revealed that hepatic fDcc mRNA levels in the low- and high-expression groups were approximately 6.8- and 60.6-fold higher, respectively, than endogenous Neo1 mRNA in wild-type mice (Figure 6A/B). Western blot analysis indicated that the expressed fDcc protein migrated at the predicted molecular weight on SDS-PAGE (Figure 6C), with protein levels proportional to mRNA levels (Figure 6D). Consistent with earlier studies (67, 68), negligible levels of endogenous Dcc mRNA and protein were detected in either wild-type or Neo1−/− mice (Figure 6B; 6C, top panel, lanes 1–4). However, unlike Neo1 (Figure 3E; top panel, lanes 1–3), only one fDcc band was detected using an antibody against mouse Dcc ectodomain (Figure 6C, top panel, lanes 5–10). Functional analysis revealed that expression of lower fDcc levels in the liver partially rescued low Hamp mRNA, leading to corresponding reductions in serum iron (Figure 6E/F; Supplemental Figure S5). High fDcc levels resulted in a complete correction of low Hamp mRNA and high serum iron to levels comparable to wild-type counterparts (Figure 6E/F). The parallel increases in hepatic Hamp and Id1 mRNA suggest that fDcc-mediated Hamp induction occurs via enhanced Bmp signaling (Figure 6E/G). Furthermore, the absence of changes in IL-6 mRNA levels (Figure 6H) ruled out inflammation as a driver of increased Hamp expression. Together, these overexpression studies suggest that Dcc retains residual hepcidin-inducing activity by enhancing Bmp signaling, implying that its homologue, Neo1, possesses a similar Hjv-independent signaling capacity.

Figure 6. Overexpression of fDcc in hepatic Neo1−/− mice induces hepcidin expression.

Figure 6.

A-B) qRT-PCR analysis of hepatic Neo1 and Dcc mRNA levels in wild-type (Neo1fl/fl;Alb-Cre−) mice and in hepatic Neo1−/− (Neo1fl/fl;Alb-Cre+) mice following intraperitoneal injection with AAV8-fDcc viral vectors at ~0.29× 1012 (+) or ~1.35×1012 (++) genome-particles per mouse. Each group consists of at least four male mice. Results are expressed relative to β-actin mRNA levels for each sample. The relative fold-changes compared to endogenous Neo1 mRNA in Neo1fl/fl;Alb-Cre− mice are shown in B. C) Representative western blot images for Dcc and β-actin in liver membrane preparation (200 μg protein) from the mice described above. D) Quantification of Dcc bands from C. The relative amounts to β-actin are presented. E) qRT-PCR analysis of hepatic Hamp mRNA levels. All mRNA results are normalized to β-actin. F) Serum iron concentrations. G-H) qRT-PCR analysis of hepatic Id1 and IL-6 mRNA levels. Data are presented as mean ± SD. One-way ANOVA was used to analyze the data across the four groups. ns, no statistical difference; *, p<0.05; ***, p<0.001; ****, p<0.0001.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we utilized various mouse models to investigate how hepatic Neo1 and Hjv coordinate to induce hepcidin expression. Our findings demonstrate that while Hjv is a more potent inducer of hepcidin than hepatic Neo1, both proteins form a crucial axis for controlling hepcidin expression. Notably, approximately 84% of Hjv-mediated hepcidin expression depends on its association with Neo1, with the remainder occurring through a Neo1-independent mechanism. Our data also suggest that hepatic Neo1 functions primarily as a scaffold to enhance Hjv function.

Elucidating the relative roles of hepatic Neo1 and Hjv is a critical step toward understanding their coordinated regulation of hepcidin expression in the liver. While previous studies using mouse models on diverse genetic backgrounds and at different ages established the essential roles of Neo1 and Hjv in hepatic hepcidin expression (25, 26, 48, 49, 63, 71), it is well recognized that genetic background can influence basal hepcidin levels and systemic iron load (56–58, 71). Consequently, their relative significance has remained elusive. By utilizing mice on a uniform genetic background, we demonstrate for the first time that Hjv is a more potent inducer of hepcidin expression than hepatic Neo1 (~96% vs. ~84%). These findings provide a refined foundation for dissecting the mechanisms of hepcidin induction and further validate the critical roles of both proteins in maintaining iron homeostasis.

Building on previous in vivo studies of the Hfe/Hjv and Tfr2/Hjv axes (59, 60), we investigated whether Neo1 and Hjv operate within a similar regulatory pathway for hepcidin expression and iron metabolism. Hfe and Tfr2 function as sensors of circulating Tf saturation to regulate hepcidin expression (2, 72, 73). Tf serves as a physiological iron carrier; increased concentrations of iron-saturated holo-Tf prevent Hfe from binding to Tfr1 and stabilize hepatic Tfr2 (74–76). Similar to Neo1, Hfe and Tfr2 are less efficient at inducing hepcidin than Hjv. In those models (59, 60), Hfe and Tfr2 are thought to function upstream of Hjv, as their combined deficiency does not further exacerbate the suppression of hepcidin seen in Hjv ablation alone. However, our genetic approach revealed a distinct pattern for Neo1. Notably, Neo1−/−;Hjv−/− double-mutant mice displayed a more profound reduction in hepcidin expression than Hjv−/− single mutants, with Hamp mRNA becoming nearly undetectable. This suppression was accompanied by significant nonheme iron accumulation in the pancreas and heart. While this additional reduction in hepcidin expression was modest, these data suggest that Neo1 and Hjv employ partially distinct mechanisms within a common regulatory axis to induce hepcidin expression. Our comparative analysis indicates that while ~84% of induction is derived from the Neo1-Hjv interaction, independent Hjv- and Neo1-specific pathways contribute approximately 12% and 3%, respectively.

The critical role of the Neo1-Hjv interaction in hepcidin expression is well documented. In humans, the most common hemochromatosis-causing mutation in HJV, G320V, disrupts its interaction with NEO1 (33, 41). Similarly, in mice, both HjvG313V (corresponding to human HJVG320V) and HjvA183R mutants, which lack the ability to interact with Neo1, display attenuated abilities to induce Bmp signaling and hepcidin expression (24, 31). Despite their inability to interact with Neo1, both mutants are folded properly and traffic to the plasma membrane similar to wild-type Hjv in transfected cells (31). Interestingly, the observed ~85% reduction in hepcidin expression by HjvA183R in earlier studies (24, 31) aligns well with the findings in this study, suggesting that ~84% of hepcidin induction by Hjv is derived from its interaction with Neo1. Further studies revealed that this Hjv-mediated hepcidin expression is associated with increased levels of truncated Neo1-ECD/TMD in the liver, which is likely derived from γ-secretase cleavage of the intracellular domain (24, 37). However, because expression of these predicted γ-secretase-cleaved forms of Neo1 in hepatic Neo1−/− mice failed to rescue low hepcidin expression (37), the physiological significance of this cleavage remains elusive.

Our data indicate that Hjv can induce hepcidin independently of Neo1 association, albeit with significantly lower efficiency than the Neo1-dependent pathway. This is supported by studies showing that low hepcidin expression in Hjv−/− mice can only be fully corrected by overexpressing fHjvA183R at levels much higher than wild-type fHjv. While overexpression approaches can occasionally introduce non-physiological artifacts, the lack of increase in IL-6 mRNA levels ruled out the possibility that the induction of hepcidin expression by fHjvA183R resulted from inflammation. Hepatic hepcidin expression can be induced by the inflammatory cytokine IL-6 through the STAT3 signaling pathway (2). Furthermore, our earlier studies showed that the expression of fHjv in the liver of wild-type mice at levels approximately 10-fold higher than the endogenous Hjv via AAV8 vectors failed to significantly elevate hepcidin expression (65). Together, these data suggest that the observed responses elicited by overexpressed fHjvA183R result from its specific function rather than a non-specific artifact.

Mechanistically, this fHjvA183R-induced hepcidin expression is not associated with parallel increases in hepatic Neo1-ECD/TMD, which contrasts with what is observed with fHjv (24). Similar to fHjv, however, the induction of hepcidin by fHjvA183R is also achieved by increasing Bmp signaling. These observations suggest that Hjv can induce hepcidin through both Neo1-dependent and Neo1-independent mechanisms. The former is the predominant and most efficient pathway, involving γ-secretase proteolysis of Neo1, whereas the latter is a minor, inefficient pathway unable to maintain iron homeostasis, as seen in hepatic Neo1−/− mice (Figure 7A) (24). This idea is supported by our earlier studies showing that low hepcidin expression in Hjv−/− mice can be fully restored by expressing approximately 15% of the Hjv mRNA levels found in wild-type mice (54). Consistently, the loss of one Hjv allele in Neo1+/+;Hjv+/− mice has no significant effect on hepcidin expression or iron homeostasis (48, 49). However, studies of Neo1−/−;Hjv+/+ and Neo1−/−;Hjv+/− mice indicate that, in the absence of hepatic Neo1, the loss of one Hjv allele results in significant decreases in the already low hepcidin expression. Together, these data suggest that hepatic Neo1 functions primarily as a scaffold to enhance Hjv function.

Figure 7. Models of NEO1-HJV-mediated hepcidin expression in hepatocytes.

Figure 7.

A) HJV induces hepcidin through both NEO1-dependent and NEO1-independent mechanisms. B-C) HJV induces hepcidin expression in the presence (B) and absence (C) of hepatic NEO1.

Additionally, data from Dcc overexpression studies suggest that hepatic Neo1 retains a residual ability to induce hepcidin expression independently of Hjv. The absence of increases in IL-6 mRNA levels rules out the possibility that this Dcc-induced hepcidin expression is a non-specific artifact. Dcc shares high structural homology with Neo1; both function as netrin-1 receptors and are essential for neural development (77, 78). However, Dcc is not naturally expressed in the liver (67, 68) and does not bind Hjv (33, 41). Based on these substitution studies, we speculate that Neo1-mediated hepcidin induction is also achieved by enhancing Bmp signaling.

Earlier in vitro and in vivo studies strongly indicate that systemic iron homeostasis requires NEO1, HJV, TfR2, and HFE to form a complex with BMP ligands and receptors, thereby stimulating hepcidin expression in hepatocytes (31–38, 41, 59, 60). Based on these observations and the data obtained from this study, we propose a new model for the hepcidin-inducing process (Figure 7B/C). In this model, NEO1 and HJV forms a complex in hepatocytes; BMP signaling and hepcidin expression are initiated upon BMP ligand binding to HJV. NEO1 acts as a scaffold to facilitate the assembly of a signaling complex containing BMP receptors, TfR2, and HFE. Within this complex, HJV simultaneously binds NEO1 and the BMP ligand through its N-terminal and C-terminal portions, respectively (32, 33). TfR2 and HFE further enhance hepcidin expression through HJV (59, 60). Lack of NEO1 significantly impairs the formation of the hepcidin-inducing complex, leading to a marked decrease in hepcidin expression. Our previous work suggests that disruption of the HJV-NEO1 interaction does not affect HJV interaction with TfR2 or HFE (31). In summary, our data demonstrate that hepatic Neo1 and Hjv acts as a crucial axis to control hepcidin expression and iron homeostasis.

Supplementary Material

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

Supplemental Tables S1: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22013900

Supplemental Figures S1-S5: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22013900

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors thank Jeffrey Wu and Claire Yung for technical assistance, the Molecular Virology Support Core (OHSU) for AAV8 viral vector production, and the Integrated Genomics Laboratory (OHSU) for providing access to the QuantStudio 7 Flex qPCR instrument.

Grants

This work was supported by NIH R01DK102791 (ASZ) and NIH R01DK125318 (CAE). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Abbreviations and Nomenclature:

BMP

the bone morphogenetic protein

Dcc

murine deleted in colorectal cancer

fDcc

FLAG-tagged Dcc

fNeo1

FLAG-tagged murine neogenin

HAMP

the human hepcidin gene

Hamp

the mouse hepcidin gene

HFE

human hemochromatosis protein

Hfe

mouse hemochromatosis protein

HJV

human hemojuvelin

Hjv

murine hemojuvelin

fHjv

FLAG-tagged murine hemojuvelin

ICD

intracellular domain

Id1

Inhibitor of DNA binding-1

NEO1

human neogenin

Neo1

mouse neogenin

Neo1-ECD/TMD

neogenin-ectodomain/transmembrane domain

Neo1fl/fl;Alb-Cre+

the hepatocyte-specific Neo1 knockout mice

Neo1fl/fl;Alb-Cre+;Hjv−/−

the Neo1-Hjv double-mutant mice

Neo1fl/fl;Alb-Cre−;Hjv−/−

the Hjv single-mutant mice

Neo1fl/fl;Alb-Cre+;Hjv+/+

the Neo1 single-mutant mice

Neo1fl/fl;Alb-Cre−;Hjv+/+

the wild-type mice

RGM

the repulsive guidance molecule

Tf

transferrin

TfR2

human transferrin receptor-2

Tfr2

murine transferrin receptor-2

Footnotes

DISCLOSURE

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article.

DATA AVAILABILITY

Raw data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Ganz T. Systemic Iron Metabolism. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2025;1480:33–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nemeth E, Ganz T. Hepcidin and Iron in Health and Disease. Annu Rev Med. 2023;74:261–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wang CY, Babitt JL. Liver iron sensing and body iron homeostasis. Blood. 2019;133(1):18–29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nemeth E, Tuttle MS, Powelson J, Vaughn MB, Donovan A, Ward DM, et al. Hepcidin regulates cellular iron efflux by binding to ferroportin and inducing its internalization. Science. 2004;306(5704):2090–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Aschemeyer S, Qiao B, Stefanova D, Valore EV, Sek AC, Ruwe TA, et al. Structure-function analysis of ferroportin defines the binding site and an alternative mechanism of action of hepcidin. Blood. 2018;131(8):899–910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Roetto A, Papanikolaou G, Politou M, Alberti F, Girelli D, Christakis J, et al. Mutant antimicrobial peptide hepcidin is associated with severe juvenile hemochromatosis. Nat Genet. 2003;33(1):21–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ganz T, Nemeth E. Hepcidin and iron homeostasis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1823(9):1434–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kautz L, Meynard D, Monnier A, Darnaud V, Bouvet R, Wang RH, et al. Iron regulates phosphorylation of Smad1/5/8 and gene expression of Bmp6, Smad7, Id1, and Atoh8 in the mouse liver. Blood. 2008;112(4):1503–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Babitt JL, Huang FW, Wrighting DM, Xia Y, Sidis Y, Samad TA, et al. Bone morphogenetic protein signaling by hemojuvelin regulates hepcidin expression. Nat Genet. 2006;38(5):531–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wang RH, Li C, Xu X, Zheng Y, Xiao C, Zerfas P, et al. A role of SMAD4 in iron metabolism through the positive regulation of hepcidin expression. Cell Metab. 2005;2(6):399–409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kulikauskas MR, X S, Bautch VL. The versatility and paradox of BMP signaling in endothelial cell behaviors and blood vessel function. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2022;79(2):77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Steinbicker AU, Bartnikas TB, Lohmeyer LK, Leyton P, Mayeur C, Kao SM, et al. Perturbation of hepcidin expression by BMP type I receptor deletion induces iron overload in mice. Blood. 2011;118(15):4224–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mayeur C, Leyton PA, Kolodziej SA, Yu B, Bloch KD. BMP type II receptors have redundant roles in the regulation of hepatic hepcidin gene expression and iron metabolism. Blood. 2014;124(13):2116–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wang CY, Core AB, Canali S, Zumbrennen-Bullough KB, Ozer S, Umans L, et al. Smad1/5 is required for erythropoietin-mediated suppression of hepcidin in mice. Blood. 2017;130(1):73–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhang AS, Anderson SA, Wang J, Yang F, Demaster K, Ahmed R, et al. Suppression of hepatic hepcidin expression in response to acute iron deprivation is associated with an increase of matripatase-2 protein. Blood. 2011;117(5):1687–99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Canali S, Zumbrennen-Bullough KB, Core AB, Wang CY, Nairz M, Bouley R, et al. Endothelial cells produce bone morphogenetic protein 6 required for iron homeostasis in mice. Blood. 2017;129(4):405–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Koch PS, Olsavszky V, Ulbrich F, Sticht C, Demory A, Leibing T, et al. Angiocrine Bmp2 signaling in murine liver controls normal iron homeostasis. Blood. 2017;129(4):415–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Andriopoulos B Jr., Corradini E, Xia Y, Faasse SA, Chen S, Grgurevic L, et al. BMP6 is a key endogenous regulator of hepcidin expression and iron metabolism. Nat Genet. 2009;41(4):482–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Meynard D, Kautz L, Darnaud V, Canonne-Hergaux F, Coppin H, Roth MP. Lack of the bone morphogenetic protein BMP6 induces massive iron overload. Nat Genet. 2009;41(4):478–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wang CY, Xiao X, Bayer A, Xu Y, Dev S, Canali S, et al. Ablation of Hepatocyte Smad1, Smad5, and Smad8 Causes Severe Tissue Iron Loading and Liver Fibrosis in Mice. Hepatology. 2019;70(6):1986–2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Xiao X, Xu Y, Moschetta GA, Yu Y, Fisher AL, Alfaro-Magallanes VM, et al. BMP5 contributes to hepcidin regulation and systemic iron homeostasis in mice. Blood. 2023;142(15):1312–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Canali S, Wang CY, Zumbrennen-Bullough KB, Bayer A, Babitt JL. Bone morphogenetic protein 2 controls iron homeostasis in mice independent of Bmp6. Am J Hematol. 2017;92(11):1204–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Muckenthaler MU, Rivella S, Hentze MW, Galy B. A Red Carpet for Iron Metabolism. Cell. 2017;168(3):344–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Enns CA, Jue S, Zhang AS. Hepatocyte neogenin is required for hemojuvelin-mediated hepcidin expression and iron homeostasis in mice. Blood. 2021;138(6):486–99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gkouvatsos K, Wagner J, Papanikolaou G, Sebastiani G, Pantopoulos K. Conditional disruption of mouse HFE2 gene: maintenance of systemic iron homeostasis requires hepatic but not skeletal muscle hemojuvelin. Hepatology. 2011;54(5):1800–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chen W, Huang FW, de Renshaw TB, Andrews NC. Skeletal muscle hemojuvelin is dispensable for systemic iron homeostasis. Blood. 2011;117(23):6319–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wallace DF, Summerville L, Subramaniam VN. Targeted disruption of the hepatic transferrin receptor 2 gene in mice leads to iron overload. Gastroenterology. 2007;132(1):301–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ajioka RS, Levy JE, Andrews NC, Kushner JP. Regulation of iron absorption in Hfe mutant mice. Blood. 2002;100(4):1465–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Levy JE, Montross LK, Andrews NC. Genes that modify the hemochromatosis phenotype in mice. J Clin Invest. 2000;105(9):1209–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Papanikolaou G, Samuels ME, Ludwig EH, MacDonald ML, Franchini PL, Dube MP, et al. Mutations in HFE2 cause iron overload in chromosome 1q-linked juvenile hemochromatosis. Nat Genet. 2004;36(1):77–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zhao N, Maxson JE, Zhang RH, Wahedi M, Enns CA, Zhang AS. Neogenin Facilitates the Induction of Hepcidin Expression by Hemojuvelin in the Liver. J Biol Chem. 2016;291(23):12322–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Healey EG, Bishop B, Elegheert J, Bell CH, Padilla-Parra S, Siebold C. Repulsive guidance molecule is a structural bridge between neogenin and bone morphogenetic protein. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2015;22(6):458–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bell CH, Healey E, van Erp S, Bishop B, Tang C, Gilbert RJ, et al. Structure of the repulsive guidance molecule (RGM)-neogenin signaling hub. Science. 2013;341(6141):77–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gao J, Chen J, Kramer M, Tsukamoto H, Zhang AS, Enns CA. Interaction of the hereditary hemochromatosis protein HFE with transferrin receptor 2 is required for transferrin-induced hepcidin expression. Cell Metab. 2009;9(3):217–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Goswami T, Andrews NC. Hereditary hemochromatosis protein, HFE, interaction with transferrin receptor 2 suggests a molecular mechanism for mammalian iron sensing. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(39):28494–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wu XG, Wang Y, Wu Q, Cheng WH, Liu W, Zhao Y, et al. HFE interacts with the BMP type I receptor ALK3 to regulate hepcidin expression. Blood. 2014;124(8):1335–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Enns CA, Zhang RH, Jue S, Zhang AS. Hepcidin expression is associated with increased gamma-secretase-mediated cleavage of neogenin in the liver. J Biol Chem. 2024;300(12):107927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.D'Alessio F, Hentze MW, Muckenthaler MU. The hemochromatosis proteins HFE, TfR2, and HJV form a membrane-associated protein complex for hepcidin regulation. J Hepatol. 2012;57(5):1052–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Meyerhardt JA, Look AT, Bigner SH, Fearon ER. Identification and characterization of neogenin, a DCC-related gene. Oncogene. 1997;14(10):1129–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Enns CA, Ahmed R, Zhang AS. Neogenin Interacts with Matriptase-2 to Facilitate Hemojuvelin Cleavage. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(42):35104–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zhang AS, West AP Jr., Wyman AE, Bjorkman PJ, Enns CA. Interaction of hemojuvelin with neogenin results in iron accumulation in human embryonic kidney 293 cells. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(40):33885–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kuns-Hashimoto R, Kuninger D, Nili M, Rotwein P. Selective binding of RGMc/hemojuvelin, a key protein in systemic iron metabolism, to BMP-2 and neogenin. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2008;294(4):C994–C1003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Xia Y, Babitt JL, Sidis Y, Chung RT, Lin HY. Hemojuvelin regulates hepcidin expression via a selective subset of BMP ligands and receptors independently of neogenin. Blood. 2008;111(10):5195–204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Yang F, West AP Jr., Allendorph GP, Choe S, Bjorkman PJ. Neogenin Interacts with Hemojuvelin through Its Two Membrane-Proximal Fibronectin Type III Domains. Biochemistry. 2008;47(14):4237–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Monnier PP, Sierra A, Macchi P, Deitinghoff L, Andersen JS, Mann M, et al. RGM is a repulsive guidance molecule for retinal axons. Nature. 2002;419(6905):392–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Matsunaga E, Chedotal A. Repulsive guidance molecule/neogenin: a novel ligand-receptor system playing multiple roles in neural development. Dev Growth Differ. 2004;46(6):481–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zhang AS, Yang F, Wang J, Tsukamoto H, Enns CA. Hemojuvelin-Neogenin Interaction Is Required for Bone Morphogenic Protein-4-induced Hepcidin Expression. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(34):22580–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Niederkofler V, Salie R, Arber S. Hemojuvelin is essential for dietary iron sensing, and its mutation leads to severe iron overload. J Clin Invest. 2005;115(8):2180–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Huang FW, Pinkus JL, Pinkus GS, Fleming MD, Andrews NC. A mouse model of juvenile hemochromatosis. J Clin Invest. 2005;115(8):2187–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Dogan DY, Urzica EI, Hornung I, Kastl P, Oguama D, Fette FM, et al. Hemojuvelin mediated hepcidin induction requires both bone morphogenetic protein type I receptors ALK2 and ALK3. Blood Adv. 2024;8(11):2870–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Okamura Y, Kohmura E, Yamashita T. TACE cleaves neogenin to desensitize cortical neurons to the repulsive guidance molecule. Neurosci Res. 2011;71(1):63–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Goldschneider D, Rama N, Guix C, Mehlen P. The neogenin intracellular domain regulates gene transcription via nuclear translocation. Mol Cell Biol. 2008;28(12):4068–79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Brown S, Jayachandran P, Negesse M, Olmo V, Vital E, Brewster R. Rgma-Induced Neo1 Proteolysis Promotes Neural Tube Morphogenesis. J Neurosci. 2019;39(38):7465–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Zhang AS, Gao J, Koeberl DD, Enns CA. The role of hepatocyte hemojuvelin in the regulation of bone morphogenic protein-6 and hepcidin expression in vivo. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(22):16416–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Frydlova J, Fujikura Y, Vokurka M, Necas E, Krijt J. Decreased hemojuvelin protein levels in mask mice lacking matriptase-2-dependent proteolytic activity. Physiol Res. 2013;62(4):405–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Cavey T, Ropert M, de Tayrac M, Bardou-Jacquet E, Island ML, Leroyer P, et al. Mouse genetic background impacts both on iron and non-iron metals parameters and on their relationships. Biometals. 2015;28(4):733–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Ajioka RS, LeBoeuf RC, Gillespie RR, Amon LM, Kushner JP. Mapping genes responsible for strain-specific iron phenotypes in murine chromosome substitution strains. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2007;39(2):199–205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.McLachlan S, Page KE, Lee SM, Loguinov A, Valore E, Hui ST, et al. Hamp1 mRNA and plasma hepcidin levels are influenced by sex and strain but do not predict tissue iron levels in inbred mice. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2017;313(5):G511–G23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Gutschow P, Schmidt PJ, Han H, Ostland V, Bartnikas TB, Pettiglio MA, et al. A competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay specific for murine hepcidin-1: correlation with hepatic mRNA expression in established and novel models of dysregulated iron homeostasis. Haematologica. 2015;100(2):167–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Kent P, Wilkinson N, Constante M, Fillebeen C, Gkouvatsos K, Wagner J, et al. Hfe and Hjv exhibit overlapping functions for iron signaling to hepcidin. J Mol Med (Berl). 2015;93(5):489–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Enns CA, Jue S, Zhang AS. Matriptase-2-mediated suppression of hepatic hepcidin expression in mice requires hepatocyte neogenin. J Biol Chem. 2026;302(3):111142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Wang L, Takabe K, Bidlingmaier SM, Ill CR, Verma IM. Sustained correction of bleeding disorder in hemophilia B mice by gene therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96(7):3906–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Lee DH, Zhou LJ, Zhou Z, Xie JX, Jung JU, Liu Y, et al. Neogenin inhibits HJV secretion and regulates BMP-induced hepcidin expression and iron homeostasis. Blood. 2010;115(15):3136–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Mao P, Wortham AM, Enns CA, Zhang AS. The catalytic, stem, and transmembrane portions of matriptase-2 are required for suppressing the expression of the iron-regulatory hormone hepcidin. J Biol Chem. 2019;294(6):2060–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Wahedi M, Wortham AM, Kleven MD, Zhao N, Jue S, Enns CA, et al. Matriptase-2 suppresses hepcidin expression by cleaving multiple components of the hepcidin induction pathway. J Biol Chem. 2017;292(44):18354–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Rutledge EA, Root BJ, Lucas JJ, Enns CA. Elimination of the O-linked glycosylation site at Thr 104 results in the generation of a soluble human-transferrin receptor. Blood. 1994;83(2):580–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Reale MA, Hu G, Zafar AI, Getzenberg RH, Levine SM, Fearon ER. Expression and alternative splicing of the deleted in colorectal cancer (DCC) gene in normal and malignant tissues. Cancer Res. 1994;54(16):4493–501. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Gad JM, Keeling SL, Wilks AF, Tan SS, Cooper HM. The expression patterns of guidance receptors, DCC and Neogenin, are spatially and temporally distinct throughout mouse embryogenesis. Dev Biol. 1997;192(2):258–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Nabeel Mustafa A, Salih Mahdi M, Ballal S, Chahar M, Verma R, Ali Al-Nuaimi AM, et al. Netrin-1: Key insights in neural development and disorders. Tissue Cell. 2025;93:102678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Taniguchi Y, Kim SH, Sisodia SS. Presenilin-dependent “gamma-secretase” processing of deleted in colorectal cancer (DCC). J Biol Chem. 2003;278(33):30425–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Sgro S, Wagner J, Fillebeen C, Pantopoulos K. Hjv(−/−) mice in either C57BL/6 or AKR genetic background do not develop spontaneous liver fibrosis. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res. 2024;1871(5):119747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Liu S, Tsyplenkova S, Charlebois E, Wallace DF, Subramaniam VN, Fillebeen C, et al. Tfr2 is necessary for acute iron-dependent hepcidin induction in mice with Tfr1-deficient hepatocytes. Blood. 2026;147(19):2252–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Xiao X, Moschetta GA, Xu Y, Fisher AL, Alfaro-Magallanes VM, Dev S, et al. Regulation of iron homeostasis by hepatocyte TfR1 requires HFE and contributes to hepcidin suppression in beta-thalassemia. Blood. 2023;141(4):422–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Giannetti AM, Bjorkman PJ. HFE and transferrin directly compete for transferrin receptor in solution and at the cell surface. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(24):25866–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Robb A, Wessling-Resnick M. Regulation of transferrin receptor 2 protein levels by transferrin. Blood. 2004;104:4294–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Johnson MB, Enns CA. Diferric transferrin regulates transferrin receptor 2 protein stability. Blood. 2004;104(13):4287–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Wilson NH, Key B. Neogenin: one receptor, many functions. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2007;39(5):874–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Cole SJ, Bradford D, Cooper HM. Neogenin: A multi-functional receptor regulating diverse developmental processes. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2007;39(9):1569–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Raw data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

RESOURCES