Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1967 Jun;190(3):541–562. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008227

Myelinated afferent fibres responding specifically to noxious stimulation of the skin

P R Burgess, E R Perl
PMCID: PMC1365427  PMID: 6051786

Abstract

1. The characteristics of receptors from the hairy skin of the hind limb of cat were studied by recording from single primary afferent fibres with fine micropipettes. The distinctive features of 513 fibres conducting under 51 m/sec are described.

2. Seventy-four fibres conducting between 6 and 37 m/sec were classified as nociceptors because they responded only to damaging mechanical stimulation of the skin. These fibres responded maximally to pinching the skin with a serrated forceps or to cutting the skin. Noxious heat, noxious cold, acid applied to the receptive field and bradykinin injected into skin cuts did not evoke discharges from such receptors. Typically their receptive fields were 2-5 cm long by 1-2·5 cm wide and consisted of responsive spots (under 1 mm diameter) separated by unresponsive areas. There was a tendency for the most slowly conducting fibres so classified to be the least sensitive.

3. Other afferent fibres had receptive fields similar to the nociceptors; however, they were excited by substantial but not noxious mechanical deformation. Their conduction velocities overlapped those of the nociceptors and extended upwards to 51 m/sec; the most rapidly conducting fibres tended to be the most sensitive to mechanical stimuli. These insensitive mechanoreceptors or moderate pressure receptors adapted more slowly than the nociceptors.

4. The majority of fine myelinated axons originated from hair receptors and had conduction velocities concentrated between 14 and 22 m/sec.

5. The possible relation of these observations to pain and reactions typical of pain is considered.

Full text

PDF
541

Images in this article

543Fig. 1
on p.543

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BOMAN K. [On the mediation of cold pain]. Acta Physiol Scand. 1959 Mar 31;45:211–215. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1959.tb01691.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bessou P., Perl E. R. Amovement receptor of the small intestine. J Physiol. 1966 Jan;182(2):404–426. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. COLLINS W. R., Jr, NULSEN F. E., RANDT C. T. Relation of peripheral nerve fiber size and sensation in man. Arch Neurol. 1960 Oct;3:381–385. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1960.00450040031003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. DOUGLAS W. W., RITCHIE J. M. A technique for recording functional activity in specific groups of medullated and non-medullated fibres in whole nerve trunks. J Physiol. 1957 Aug 29;138(1):19–30. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1957.sp005835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fernandez de Molina A., Perl E. R. Sympathetic activity and the systemic circulation in the spinal cat. J Physiol. 1965 Nov;181(1):82–102. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. HENSEL H., IGGO A., WITT I. A quantitative study of sensitive cutaneous thermoreceptors with C afferent fibres. J Physiol. 1960 Aug;153:113–126. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. HUNT C. C., McINTYRE A. K. An analysis of fibre diameter and receptor characteristics of myelinated cutaneous afferent fibres in cat. J Physiol. 1960 Aug;153:99–112. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. IGGO A. Cutaneous heat and cold receptors with slowly conducting (C) afferent fibres. Q J Exp Physiol Cogn Med Sci. 1959 Oct;44:362–370. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.1959.sp001417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. IGGO A. Cutaneous mechanoreceptors with afferent C fibres. J Physiol. 1960 Jul;152:337–353. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. IRIUCHIJIMA J., ZOTTERMAN Y. The specificity of afferent cutaneous C fibres in mammals. Acta Physiol Scand. 1960 Jul 15;49:267–278. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1960.tb01952.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Melzack R., Wall P. D. Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Science. 1965 Nov 19;150(3699):971–979. doi: 10.1126/science.150.3699.971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ogden T. E., Miller R. F. Studies of the optic nerve of the rhesus monkey: nerve fiber spectrum and physiological properties. Vision Res. 1966 Oct;6(9):485–506. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. PAINTAL A. S. Functional analysis of group III afferent fibres of mammalian muscles. J Physiol. 1960 Jul;152:250–270. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. PERL E. R. Crossed reflexes of cutaneous origin. Am J Physiol. 1957 Mar;188(3):609–615. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1957.188.3.609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. SHANTHAVEERAPPA T. R., BOURNE G. H. Radial bands in the optic nerve myelin sheath. Nature. 1962 Dec 22;196:1215–1217. doi: 10.1038/1961215b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. TASAKI I. Properties of myelinated fibers in frog sciatic nerve and in spinal cord as examined with micro-electrodes. Jpn J Physiol. 1952 Nov;3(1):73–94. doi: 10.2170/jjphysiol.3.73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. WITT I., HENSEL H. Afferente Impulse aus der Extremitätenhaut der Katze bei thermischer und mechanischer Reizung. Pflugers Arch. 1959;268(6):582–596. doi: 10.1007/BF00362294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Zotterman Y. Touch, pain and tickling: an electro-physiological investigation on cutaneous sensory nerves. J Physiol. 1939 Feb 14;95(1):1–28. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1939.sp003707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES