ABSTRACT
Aim
To investigate seasonal patterns in new‐onset antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)‐associated vasculitis (AAV) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic in Japan.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the nationwide multicenter registry of patients with AAV. Patients newly diagnosed with AAV between 2017 and 2022 were included, comprising microscopic polyangiitis (MPA), granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA). We compared the seasonal distribution of AAV onset between the pre‐COVID‐19 (2017–2019) and COVID‐19 (2020–2022) periods.
Results
A total of 871 patients were included (499 before and 372 during the COVID‐19 period). Poisson regression analysis revealed a seasonal variation in AAV onset in the pre‐COVID‐19 period (p < 0.001), with lower onset in autumn [incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.64, p < 0.001] and higher onset in spring and summer (IRR 1.16, p = 0.048 and IRR 1.23, p = 0.005) compared to winter. Importantly, a significant interaction between season and period (p for interaction = 0.032) indicated that the seasonal pattern differed between periods, with a relative increase in spring (IRR 1.16, p = 0.010). In the subanalyses, seasonal variation was consistently observed in MPA, but not in GPA and EGPA. The interaction between season and period was not statistically significant in each disease group.
Conclusion
AAV exhibited a clear seasonal pattern, which differed during the COVID‐19 period. However, these differences were not consistently observed across individual disease subtypes, and the factors underlying them remain unclear.
Keywords: antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody, coronavirus disease 2019, eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, granulomatosis with polyangiitis, microscopic polyangiitis, vasculitis
Practitioner Points
AAV showed significant seasonal variation, with higher incidence in spring and summer and lower incidence in autumn.
During the COVID‐19 period, the seasonal pattern of AAV onset differed, with a relative increase in spring and attenuation of the summer peak.
Differences between the pre‐COVID‐19 and COVID‐19 periods were not consistently observed across individual disease subtypes or ANCA serotypes.
1. Introduction
Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)‐associated vasculitis (AAV) comprises a group of systemic small‐vessel diseases including microscopic polyangiitis (MPA), granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) [1]. AAV is characterized by the presence of autoantibodies directed against proteinase 3 (PR3‐ANCA) or myeloperoxidase (MPO‐ANCA), which can lead to severe inflammation and organ damage [2]. Environmental exposure to specific infectious agents or allergens is considered a trigger for ANCA production and AAV development [3, 4].
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic, which began in late 2019, drastically altered infectious disease transmission patterns and environmental exposure through widespread public health measures, including lockdowns and universal mask use. Although cases of vasculitis following COVID‐19 infection have been reported [5], a large single‐center study failed to demonstrate a clear association [6]. Therefore, evidence for a causal relationship remains inconclusive.
We previously reported seasonal variation in AAV onset, including a consistent reduction in autumn among patients with MPA and MPO‐ANCA [7]. However, the overall effect of the COVID‐19 pandemic on the epidemiology and seasonality of AAV has not been established. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to investigate whether seasonal patterns of AAV onset differed between the pre‐COVID‐19 and COVID‐19 periods using data from a nationwide, multicenter registry in Japan (J‐CANVAS) and to compare seasonal patterns across AAV subtypes and ANCA serotypes.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design and Participants
This retrospective cohort study used data from the J‐CANVAS registry, a nationwide, multicenter database comprising 29 Japanese institutions (Table S1; Figure S1). Patients were eligible if they were registered in the J‐CANVAS registry and experienced new‐onset AAV between January 2017 and December 2022. Those with recurrent disease or without available data regarding the month of AAV onset were excluded from seasonality analyses.
All participants were ≥ 20 years of age. Diseases were classified according to the 2012 Revised International Chapel Hill Consensus Conference nomenclature, and patients were categorized into the MPA, GPA, or EGPA group [1].
AAV onset was defined as the first appearance of constitutional or organ‐specific symptoms suggestive of vasculitis, such as fever, arthralgia, myalgia, weight loss, or abnormalities of the ear, eye, nose, throat, skin, lungs, kidneys, or peripheral nerves, according to the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (version 3) [8].
2.2. Data Collection and Variable Definitions
The J‐CANVAS registry enrolled patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed AAV from April 2017 through March 2023. As data for 2023 were available only for January through March, the present analysis was restricted to the complete calendar years 2017–2022. This analysis enabled comparison of two equal three‐year periods (2017–2019 and 2020–2022). Clinical and laboratory information, including age and sex at diagnosis, AAV disease type, and ANCA profiles, was extracted from the J‐CANVAS registry. To assess seasonality, seasons were defined according to the Japan Meteorological Agency as spring (March–May), summer (June–August), autumn (September–November), and winter (December–February) [9]. We defined the pre‐COVID‐19 period and the COVID‐19 period as January 2017 to December 2019 and January 2020 to December 2022, respectively, based on the timing of the COVID‐19 outbreak in Japan in early 2020 [10, 11]. To assess background infection status for descriptive purposes and qualitative discussion, the daily number of new COVID‐19 cases in Japan was obtained from open data provided by the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare [12]. These data were not included in formal statistical testing.
ANCA testing was performed using indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) or an enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (EIA). For consistency, p‐ANCA detected using IIF and MPO‐ANCA detected using EIA were defined as MPO‐ANCA‐positive, while c‐ANCA detected using IIF and PR3‐ANCA detected using EIA were classified as PR3‐ANCA‐positive.
The study was approved by the Ethical Committee for Epidemiology at Hiroshima University on June 2, 2021 (approval number: E‐2021‐2465) and by the Institutional Review Board or Ethics Committee of each participating institution and conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from patients via an online opt‐out form. Patients who did not provide consent were excluded from the study.
2.3. Statistical Analysis
Continuous variables were summarized as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) or median (interquartile range), whereas categorical variables were presented as counts and percentages. Data on the month of disease onset were missing for 2 of 873 patients; these patients were excluded from analyses. To compare baseline characteristics, the Kruskal–Wallis test was used for continuous variables, and either Fisher's exact test or Pearson's chi‐squared test was applied for categorical variables.
To evaluate seasonal variation in AAV onset, Poisson regression models were fitted using the monthly number of incident cases as the outcome variable. Season (spring, summer, autumn, and winter), period (pre‐COVID‐19 versus COVID‐19 periods), and their interaction term were included as explanatory variables to assess differences in seasonal patterns between the two periods.
Winter and the pre‐COVID‐19 period were specified as reference categories. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. A significant interaction term was interpreted as evidence that the seasonal pattern differed between the two periods.
To assess the robustness of the observed seasonal patterns over time, year‐stratified analyses were additionally performed for each year from 2017 to 2022. Furthermore, the COVID‐19 period was divided into the early COVID‐19 period (2020–2021) and the late COVID‐19 period (2022), and differences in seasonal patterns between these phases were evaluated using a season and period interaction term in the Poisson regression model.
All statistical tests were two‐sided, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Analyses were conducted using JMP Student Edition 18 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA), and figures were generated using Prism 10.0.2 (GraphPad Inc., Boston, MA, USA).
3. Results
3.1. Baseline Characteristics of Patients With AAV
Of the 1105 patients registered, 232 patients with relapsing AAV and two patients with missing data on the month of onset were excluded (Figure 1).
FIGURE 1.

This flow diagram shows the selection process of patients included in the present study. Among 1105 patients with AAV in the J‐CANVAS registry, 232 patients with relapsing AAV were excluded. After further excluding two patients with missing data on the month of disease onset, 871 patients with new‐onset AAV were included in the analyses. These patients were then categorized into the pre‐COVID‐19 period (n = 499) and the COVID‐19 period (n = 372). AAV, ANCA‐associated vasculitis; ANCA, antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody; COVID‐19, coronavirus disease 2019.
A total of 871 patients with newly diagnosed AAV were included in the study (Table 1). Among them, 499 patients were diagnosed during the pre‐COVID‐19 period, whereas 372 were diagnosed during the COVID‐19 period. The mean age of the entire cohort was 70.7 years (SD, 13.1 years); no significant difference was observed between the pre‐COVID‐19 and COVID‐19 periods (70.5 years [SD, 13.1] versus 70.9 years [SD, 13.1]) (Table 1). A total of 500 patients (57.4%) were female (283 [56.8%] during the pre‐COVID‐19 period and 217 [58.3%] during the COVID‐19 period).
TABLE 1.
Baseline of the new‐onset AAV.
| Variables | Overall period (N = 871) | Pre‐COVID‐19 period (N = 499) | COVID‐19 period (N = 372) | p (pre‐COVID‐19 period vs. COVID‐19 period) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) |
70.7 ± 13.1 73 (66–80) |
70.5 ± 13.1 73 (65–79) |
70.9 ± 13.1 73 (66–80) |
0.581 | |
| Age ≥ 65 years | 671 (77.0) | 382 (76.6) | 289 (77.7) | 0.745 | |
| Female | 500 (57.4) | 283 (56.8) | 217 (58.3) | 0.678 | |
| Disease type of AAV | MPA | 530 (60.9) | 309 (61.9) | 221 (59.4) | 0.140 |
| GPA | 168 (19.3) | 105 (21.0) | 63 (16.9) | 0.483 | |
| EGPA | 173 (19.9) | 85 (17.0) | 88 (23.7) | 0.046* | |
| Serotype of ANCA | Positivity for MPO‐ANCA | 683 (78.4) | 394 (79.0) | 289 (77.7) | 0.504 |
| Positivity for PR3‐ANCA | 75 (8.6) | 47 (9.4) | 28 (7.5) | 0.444 | |
| Double negativity | 113 (13.0) | 58 (11.6) | 55 (14.8) | 0.186 | |
| BVAS |
15.2 ± 7.0 15 (11–20) |
15.2 ± 7.0 15 (11–20) |
15.1 ± 7.0 15 (11–19.8) |
0.879 | |
Note: Values are mean ± standard deviation, median (interquartile range) or number (%). Continuous variables are compared by the Kruskal–Wallis test. Categorical variables are compared by Fisher's exact test or chi‐square test.
Abbreviations: AAV, ANCA‐associated vasculitis; ANCA, anti‐neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody; BVAS, Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score; COVID‐19, coronavirus disease 2019; EGPA, eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis; GPA, granulomatosis with polyangiitis; MPA, microscopic polyangiitis; MPO, myeloperoxidase; PR3, proteinase‐3.
p < 0.05.
Regarding disease subtypes, MPA, GPA, and EGPA were identified in 309, 105, and 85 patients, respectively, during the pre‐COVID‐19 period and 221, 63, and 88 patients, respectively, during the COVID‐19 period. Regarding ANCA serotypes, MPO‐ANCA positivity was observed in 394 patients (79.0%) and 289 patients (77.7%) during the pre‐COVID‐19 and COVID‐19 periods, respectively, whereas PR3‐ANCA positivity was observed in 47 patients (9.4%) and 28 patients (7.5%) during the pre‐COVID‐19 and COVID‐19 periods, respectively. The mean Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score was comparable between the pre‐COVID‐19 and COVID‐19 periods (15.2 points versus 15.1 points).
3.2. Comparison of AAV Onset Distributions Before and During the COVID‐19 Pandemic
During the pre‐COVID‐19 period, AAV onset exhibited a significant seasonal variation (p < 0.001; Table 2). The monthly distribution pattern differed during the COVID‐19 period, with a less pronounced summer peak and a relatively greater contribution of spring cases than in the pre‐COVID‐19 period (Figure 2A). This shift was also reflected in the seasonal distribution (Figure 2B).
TABLE 2.
Seasonal variation of ANCA‐associated vasculitis onset before and during the COVID‐19 period (Poisson regression analysis).
| Variables | Pre‐COVID‐19 period, IRR (95% CI) | p | COVID‐19 period, IRR (95% CI) | p | Interaction p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall seasonality | — | < 0.001 | — | < 0.001 | — |
| Spring (vs. Winter) | 1.16 (1.00–1.34) | 0.048 | 1.55 (1.31–1.83) | < 0.001 | 0.010 |
| Summer (vs. Winter) | 1.23 (1.06–1.42) | 0.005 | 0.97 (0.80–1.17) | 0.751 | 0.048 |
| Autumn (vs. Winter) | 0.64 (0.54–0.77) | < 0.001 | 0.63 (0.50–0.78) | < 0.001 | 0.887 |
| Season × Period interaction | 0.032 | ||||
Note: Winter was used as the reference category. Interaction p‐values were observed from the Poisson regression model including season, period, and the season × period interaction.
Abbreviations: AAV, ANCA‐associated vasculitis; ANCA, antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody; CI, confidence interval; COVID‐19, coronavirus disease 2019; IRR, incidence rate ratio.
FIGURE 2.

Monthly (A) and seasonal (B) distributions of ANCA‐associated vasculitis onset. Bars represent mean incidence across each season for the pre‐COVID‐19 (2017–2019) and COVID‐19 (2020–2022) periods. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean. Monthly (C) and seasonal (D) distributions of MPA onset. Seasonal variation in the onset of GPA (E) and EGPA (F). AAV, ANCA‐associated vasculitis; ANCA, antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody; COVID‐19, coronavirus disease 2019; EGPA, eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis; GPA, granulomatosis with polyangiitis; MPA, microscopic polyangiitis.
Poisson regression analysis confirmed these findings (Table 2), demonstrating that, compared to that in winter (used as the reference category), the incidence was higher in summer (IRR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.06–1.42; p = 0.005) and spring (IRR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.00–1.34; p = 0.048), whereas it was significantly lower in autumn (IRR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.54–0.77; p < 0.001). During the COVID‐19 period, overall seasonal variation remained significant (p < 0.001), with higher onset in spring, comparable onset in summer, and lower onset in autumn than in winter (Table 2).
A significant interaction between season and period was observed (p for interaction = 0.032), with period‐related changes in spring (p for interaction = 0.010) and summer (p for interaction = 0.048), but not in autumn (p for interaction = 0.887) (Table 2).
Year‐stratified analyses revealed broadly consistent patterns across individual years: decreased autumn incidence throughout 2017–2022 and increased spring incidence in 2020 and 2022 (Table S2). Furthermore, we observed no significant difference in seasonal patterns between the early (2020–2021) and late (2022) COVID‐19 periods (p for interaction = 0.500; Table S3).
3.3. Comparison of AAV Seasonal Onset According to Disease Subtypes Before and During the COVID‐19 Pandemic
In the subtype‐specific analyses, significant seasonal variation during the pre‐COVID‐19 period was observed only in MPA (p < 0.001; Table 3). Compared with winter (reference category), MPA onset was significantly higher in summer (IRR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.08–1.56; p = 0.006), whereas it was significantly lower in autumn (IRR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.49–0.79; p < 0.001). These findings were consistent with the descriptive distributions shown in Figure 2C,D. In contrast, no significant overall seasonal variation was observed in GPA (p = 0.177) or EGPA (p = 0.390), as reflected by their relatively flat seasonal distributions (Figure 2E,F).
TABLE 3.
Seasonal variation of individual ANCA‐associated vasculitis onset before and during the COVID‐19 period (Poisson regression analysis).
| Disease | Variables | Pre‐COVID‐19 period, IRR (95% CI) | p | COVID‐19 period, IRR (95% CI) | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPA | Overall seasonality | — | < 0.001 | — | < 0.001 |
| Spring (vs. Winter) | 1.21 (1.00–1.45) | 0.051 | 1.49 (1.20–1.83) | < 0.001 | |
| Summer (vs. Winter) | 1.30 (1.08–1.56) | 0.006 | 0.92 (0.71–1.16) | 0.475 | |
| Autumn (vs. Winter) | 0.63 (0.49–0.79) | < 0.001 | 0.61 (0.45–0.80) | < 0.001 | |
| Season × Period interaction | 0.073 | ||||
| GPA | Overall seasonality | — | 0.177 | — | 0.046 |
| Spring (vs. Winter) | 1.09 (0.78–1.51) | 0.591 | 1.69 (1.14–2.46) | 0.009 | |
| Summer (vs. Winter) | 1.13 (0.81–1.55) | 0.453 | 1.08 (0.69–1.64) | 0.727 | |
| Autumn (vs. Winter) | 0.66 (0.44–0.96) | 0.029 | 0.68 (0.39–1.09) | 0.112 | |
| Season × Period interaction | 0.273 | ||||
| EGPA | Overall seasonality | — | 0.390 | — | 0.030 |
| Spring (vs. Winter) | 1.34 (0.94–1.87) | 0.099 | 1.44 (1.02–2.01) | 0.038 | |
| Summer (vs. Winter) | 0.81 (0.53–1.19) | 0.300 | 0.58 (0.35–0.89) | 0.010 | |
| Autumn (vs. Winter) | 0.96 (0.64–1.38) | 0.821 | 0.96 (0.65–1.39) | 0.839 | |
| Season × Period interaction | 0.644 | ||||
Note: Winter was used as the reference category. Interaction p‐values were observed from the Poisson regression model including season, period, and the season × period interaction.
Abbreviations: ANCA, antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody; CI, confidence interval; COVID‐19, coronavirus disease 2019; EGPA, eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis; GPA, granulomatosis with polyangiitis; IRR, incidence rate ratio; MPA, microscopic polyangiitis.
The interaction between season and period did not reach statistical significance in any subtype (p for interaction: MPA, p = 0.073; GPA, p = 0.273; EGPA, p = 0.644), indicating no clear evidence that the COVID‐19 period altered the overall seasonal pattern within individual disease groups.
3.4. Comparison of AAV Seasonal Onset According to ANCA Serotypes Before and During the COVID‐19 Pandemic
According to ANCA serotype (Table S4), significant seasonal variation during the pre‐COVID‐19 period was observed only in patients with MPO‐ANCA (p < 0.001), showing a pattern similar to that of the overall AAV cohort and MPA. In contrast, no significant overall seasonal variation was detected in PR3‐ANCA‐positive or ANCA‐negative cases.
The interaction between season and period was not statistically significant for any serotype subgroup, indicating no clear evidence that the COVID‐19 period altered the seasonal pattern within these groups.
4. Discussion
In this large multicenter study, we demonstrated that AAV exhibits a clear seasonal pattern, with higher incidence in spring and summer and lower incidence in autumn during the pre‐COVID‐19 period. Importantly, this seasonal pattern differed between the pre‐COVID‐19 and COVID‐19 periods, as evidenced by a relative increase in spring‐onset cases and attenuation of the summer peak in the whole AAV cohort.
However, these changes were not consistently observed across individual disease subtypes or ANCA serotypes. While seasonal variation was evident in MPA and MPO‐ANCA‐positive AAV, no significant overall seasonality or interaction with the COVID‐19 period was detected in GPA, EGPA, or other serotype‐defined subgroups. Collectively, these findings suggest heterogeneity in seasonal patterns among AAV disease subtypes.
Studies during the COVID‐19 pandemic suggested an increased incidence of various autoimmune diseases, including vasculitides [13, 14]. In Japan, administrative data showed an increase in the number of new applicants to designated intractable disease programs, suggesting a broader rise in newly diagnosed immune‐mediated disorders [15]. However, in the present study, the number of registered patients decreased during the COVID‐19 period (Figure S2). This discrepancy may partly reflect pandemic‐related restrictions on healthcare access, delayed referral to specialized institutions, altered referral patterns, and variability in case capture inherent to voluntary registries, rather than necessarily indicating a true decline in AAV incidence. Additionally, the exact latency period from exposure to an infectious trigger to the clinical onset of vasculitis has not been defined. Therefore, the direct temporal relationship between infection waves and AAV onset should be interpreted with caution. Accordingly, we focused on differences in the seasonal patterns rather than absolute case numbers. This study did not track individual infections or behaviors; instead, it examined the relationship between AAV onset and the COVID‐19 pandemic as a macro‐level environmental factor.
We consistently observed decreased frequency of AAV onset in autumn throughout 2017–2022. Environmental factors have been considered contributors to seasonal variations in AAV onset, potentially through infections, allergens, or other external exposures [16, 17]. Vitamin D may be a potential seasonal factor, as serum 25‐hydroxyvitamin D levels reportedly peak toward the end of summer in the Japanese population [18], potentially contributing to the decreased frequency of AAV onset observed in autumn [19, 20]. However, as serum vitamin D levels were not measured in our cohort, this hypothesis remains speculative. In contrast to the consistently decreased frequency of autumn onset, the seasonal pattern differed between the pre‐COVID‐19 and COVID‐19 periods, with a relative increase in spring‐onset cases and a reduced relative frequency of the summer‐onset cases during the COVID‐19 period. These changes may have been associated with changes in environmental exposures, infection patterns, healthcare‐seeking behavior, and public health measures during the pandemic. The reduction in summer onset occurred during a period when Japan experienced major COVID‐19 waves accompanied by substantial changes in mobility and social activity [12, 21]. However, such temporal overlap cannot distinguish the potential effects of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection or its variants from those of behavioral changes, public health measures, or altered healthcare access. Moreover, we identified no clear temporal explanation for the relative increase in spring‐onset cases, which may partly reflect a relative redistribution of cases across seasons. Therefore, these interpretations remain speculative.
The epidemiological context also varied substantially throughout the COVID‐19 period. In particular, 2022 was characterized by widespread circulation of Omicron variants in Japan [22]. In that year, the infection patterns, disease severity, public health measures, and population behavior differed from those during the earlier pandemic period. However, the additional phase‐stratified analysis did not indicate a clear difference in seasonal patterns between the early COVID‐19 period (2020–2021) and 2022. Nevertheless, pandemic‐related changes in healthcare access, delayed referral, and altered referral patterns may have influenced the observed temporal distribution of AAV onset.
The lack of consistent seasonal patterns and period‐related differences across individual disease subtypes highlights the heterogeneity of AAV and suggests that the factors driving disease onset may differ by subtype. Although seasonal variation was prominent in MPA and MPO‐ANCA‐positive AAV, no clear seasonal variation was observed in GPA or EGPA. This discrepancy may reflect fundamentally different pathogenetic mechanisms, such as the involvement of upper respiratory tract infections, which are frequently implicated in GPA and EGPA [23, 24], or simply reflect a lack of statistical power due to limited sample sizes.
This study had certain limitations. As data on ANCA levels were unavailable, we could not assess their potential correlations with seasonality. Additionally, data on prior COVID‐19 infections and patients' vaccination status were not collected, thereby preventing assessment of their influence on disease onset. Accordingly, future studies incorporating detailed data on prior infection, vaccination status, and behavioral changes during the pandemic may provide additional insights. Furthermore, the sample sizes of the GPA, EGPA, and PR3‐ANCA‐positive subgroups were relatively small, which may have reduced the statistical power of the subgroup analyses. Finally, as the analysis was restricted to data through 2022, we could not assess whether the seasonal pattern of AAV onset subsequently returned to the pre‐COVID‐19 pattern.
This study has several strengths. First, it includes the largest number of cases to date among studies investigating environmental factors and AAV onset. Second, the use of a nationwide multicenter registry (J‐CANVAS) involving 29 institutions enhances the generalizability of our findings. Third, the use of the exact date of symptom onset, based on BVAS, enabled a more precise temporal analysis compared with studies relying on the date of diagnosis.
In conclusion, AAV exhibited a clear seasonal pattern during the pre‐COVID‐19 period, with higher incidence in spring and summer and lower incidence in autumn. The seasonal distribution differed during the COVID‐19 period, although these differences were not consistently observed across disease subtypes or ANCA serotypes. However, the factors underlying these differences remain uncertain and warrant further investigation.
Author Contributions
N.O. contributed to formal analysis and writing – original draft. Y.Y. contributed to conceptualization, formal analysis, methodology, and writing – review and editing. T.K., N.Y., T.I.‐I., T.K., and Y.K. contributed to project administration and supervision. All authors contributed to investigation, critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content, approved the final version of the manuscript, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Funding
This study was partially supported by the JSPS Program for Forming Japan's Peaks Research Universities (J‐PEAKS) (grant number JPJS00420230011). This work was supported in part by JSPS KAKENHI (grant number 24K18642 to Y. Yoshida) and the Tsuchiya Memorial Medical Foundation (to Y. Yoshida).
Ethics Statement
This study was approved by the Ethical Committee for Epidemiology at Hiroshima University on June 2, 2021 (approval number: E‐2021‐2465) and by the Institutional Review Board or Ethics Committee of each participating institution and was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Consent
Informed consent was obtained from patients via an online opt‐out form. Patients who did not provide consent were excluded from the study.
Conflicts of Interest
Hirosuke Takagi has received speaker honoraria from Asahi Kasei Pharma, Astellas Pharma, and Kissei Pharmaceutical, and travel/accommodation support from Asahi Kasei Pharma, Chugai Pharmaceutical, and Kissei Pharmaceutical. Naoto Azuma has received speaker honoraria from Eli Lilly Japan and a research grant from Asahi Kasei Pharma. Hiroaki Dobashi has received speaker honoraria from Kissei Pharmaceutical, AbbVie, Asahi Kasei Pharma, UCB, Ayumi Pharmaceutical, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis Pharma, Eli Lilly Japan, AstraZeneca, and has received research funding from AbbVie and Chugai Pharmaceutical. Isao Matsumoto has received speaker's fees, consultancy fees or honoraria from Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eisai, Glaxo SmithKline, Eli Lilly Japan, Boehringer Ingelheim and UCB. Toshiko Ito‐Ihara has received speaker honoraria from Kissei Pharmaceutical. Takashi Kawaguchi has received honoraria and speaker's fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical. Yutaka Kawahito has received research grants from Asahi Kasei and Chugai Pharmaceutical, and speaker's fees from Asahi Kasei Pharma, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Novartis Pharma, Kissei Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, Ayumi Pharmaceutical and Viatris. Shintaro Hirata has received speaker's fees, consultancy fees, or research grants from AbbVie, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Ayumi Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celltrion, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi‐Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly Japan, Gilead Sciences, Glaxo SmithKline, Janssen, Nihon‐Shinyaku, Novartis Pharma, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Sandoz, Taisho Pharmaceutical, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, and UCB. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Supporting information
Table S1: Participating institutions.
Table S2: Year‐stratified analysis of seasonal variation in the onset of ANCA‐associated vasculitis from 2017 to 2022.
Table S3: Interaction analysis of seasonal variation in ANCA‐associated vasculitis onset between the early and late COVID‐19 period using Poisson regression.
Table S4: Seasonal variation of ANCA‐associated vasculitis onset stratified by ANCA serotype before and during the COVID‐19 period (Poisson regression analysis).
Figure S1: Geographical distribution of the participating institutions across Japan. This study included data from 29 geographically diverse institutions nationwide, and each star represents one participating center.
Figure S2: The graph shows the monthly number of incident cases of ANCA‐associated vasculitis (AAV) during the observation period from January 2017 through December 2022.
Acknowledgments
We thank all members of the J‐CANVAS registry and participating institutions for their contributions to this study. We thank Editage (www.editage.jp) for English language editing.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated and analyzed in the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
- 1. Jennette J. C., Falk R. J., Bacon P. A., et al., “2012 Revised International Chapel Hill Consensus Conference Nomenclature of Vasculitides,” Arthritis and Rheumatism 65, no. 1 (2013): 1–11, 10.1002/art.37715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Paroli M., Perricone C., and Shoenfeld Y., “New Insights Into Pathogenesis and Treatment of ANCA‐Associated Vasculitis: Autoantibodies and Beyond,” Antibodies 12, no. 1 (2023): 25, 10.3390/antib12010025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Zhao W. M., Wang Z. J., Shi R., et al., “Environmental Factors Influencing the Risk of ANCA‐Associated Vasculitis,” Frontiers in Immunology 13 (2022): 991256, 10.3389/fimmu.2022.991256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Chen M. and Kallenberg C. G., “The Environment, Geoepidemiology and ANCA‐Associated Vasculitides,” Autoimmunity Reviews 9, no. 5 (2010): A293–A298, 10.1016/j.autrev.2009.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Izci Duran T., Turkmen E., Dilek M., Sayarlioglu H., and Arik N., “ANCA‐Associated Vasculitis After COVID‐19,” Rheumatology International 41, no. 8 (2021): 1523–1529, 10.1007/s00296-021-04914-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Touma E. and Bisharat N., “No Evidence of Increased Incidence of ANCA‐Associated Vasculitis Following the COVID‐19 Pandemic: A Single‐Centre Experience,” Rheumatology (Oxford, England) 63, no. 9 (2024): e256–e257, 10.1093/rheumatology/keae115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Yoshida Y., Nakamoto N., Oka N., et al., “Seasonal Influence on Development of Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody‐Associated Vasculitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study Conducted at Multiple Institutions in Japan (J‐CANVAS),” Journal of Rheumatology 50, no. 9 (2023): 1152–1158, 10.3899/jrheum.2023-0040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Mukhtyar C., Lee R., Brown D., et al., “Modification and Validation of the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (Version 3),” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 68, no. 12 (2009): 1827–1832, 10.1136/ard.2008.101279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Japan Meteorological Agency , “Overview of Japan's Climate,” accessed May 3, 2026, https://www.data.jma.go.jp/gmd/cpd/longfcst/en/tourist_japan.html.
- 10. Japan Institute for Health Security , “COVID‐19,” accessed May 3, 2026, https://id‐info.jihs.go.jp/en/2019‐ncov‐e‐en.html.
- 11. World Health Organization , “Listings of WHO's Response to COVID‐19,” accessed May 3, 2026, https://www.who.int/news/item/27‐04‐2020‐who‐timeline‐‐‐covid‐19.
- 12. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare , “Open Data,” accessed May 3, 2026, https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/covid‐19/open‐data.html.
- 13. Becker R. C., “COVID‐19‐Associated Vasculitis and Vasculopathy,” Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis 50, no. 3 (2020): 499–511, 10.1007/s11239-020-02230-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Mv P., Auanassova A., Yessirkepov M., et al., “New‐Onset Systemic Vasculitis Following SARS‐CoV‐2 Infection and Vaccination: The Trigger, Phenotype, and Outcome,” Clinical Rheumatology 42, no. 10 (2023): 2761–2775, 10.1007/s10067-023-06694-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Japan Intractable Diseases Information Center , “Number of Holders of Certificates for Specific Medical Expenses (Designated Intractable Diseases),” accessed May 3, 2026, https://www.nanbyou.or.jp/entry/5354.
- 16. Stegeman C. A., Tervaert J. W., Sluiter W. J., Manson W. L., de Jong P. E., and Kallenberg C. G., “Association of Chronic Nasal Carriage of Staphylococcus Aureus and Higher Relapse Rates in Wegener Granulomatosis,” Annals of Internal Medicine 120, no. 1 (1994): 12–17, 10.7326/0003-4819-120-1-199401010-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Lane S. E., Watts R. A., Bentham G., Innes N. J., and Scott D. G., “Are Environmental Factors Important in Primary Systemic Vasculitis? A Case‐Control Study,” Arthritis and Rheumatism 48, no. 3 (2003): 814–823, 10.1002/art.10830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Ono Y., Suzuki A., Kotake M., et al., “Seasonal Changes of Serum 25‐Hydroxyvitamin D and Intact Parathyroid Hormone Levels in a Normal Japanese Population,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism 23, no. 2 (2005): 147–151, 10.1007/s00774-004-0553-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Sumel A., Kirti G., Gaurav G., et al., “Vitamin D—A Prominent Immunomodulator to Prevent COVID‐19 Infection,” International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases 26, no. 1 (2023): 13–30, 10.1111/1756-185X.14477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Jill H., Nancy R. C., Erik K. A., et al., “Vitamin D and Marine Omega 3 Fatty Acid Supplementation and Incident Autoimmune Disease: VITAL Randomized Controlled Trial,” BMJ 376 (2022): e066452, 10.1136/bmj-2021-066452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Joshi Y. V. and Musalem A., “Lockdowns Lose One Third of Their Impact on Mobility in a Month,” Scientific Reports 11, no. 1 (2021): 22658, 10.1038/s41598-021-02133-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Karako K., Song P., Chen Y., and Karako T., “COVID‐19 in Japan During 2020‐2022: Characteristics, Responses, and Implications for the Health Care System,” Journal of Global Health 14, no. 12 (2022): 03073, 10.7189/jogh.12.03073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Popa E. R., Stegeman C. A., Abdulahad W. H., et al., “Staphylococcal Toxic‐Shock‐Syndrome‐Toxin‐1 as a Risk Factor for Disease Relapse in Wegener's Granulomatosis,” Rheumatology (Oxford, England) 46, no. 6 (2007): 1029–1033, 10.1093/rheumatology/kem022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. White J. and Dubey S., “Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis: A Review,” Autoimmunity Reviews 22, no. 1 (2023): 103219, 10.1016/j.autrev.2022.103219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Table S1: Participating institutions.
Table S2: Year‐stratified analysis of seasonal variation in the onset of ANCA‐associated vasculitis from 2017 to 2022.
Table S3: Interaction analysis of seasonal variation in ANCA‐associated vasculitis onset between the early and late COVID‐19 period using Poisson regression.
Table S4: Seasonal variation of ANCA‐associated vasculitis onset stratified by ANCA serotype before and during the COVID‐19 period (Poisson regression analysis).
Figure S1: Geographical distribution of the participating institutions across Japan. This study included data from 29 geographically diverse institutions nationwide, and each star represents one participating center.
Figure S2: The graph shows the monthly number of incident cases of ANCA‐associated vasculitis (AAV) during the observation period from January 2017 through December 2022.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated and analyzed in the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
