Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Sep 9.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Top Dev Biol. 2024 Feb 24;156:1–17. doi: 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2024.01.004

Macrophage lineages in heart development and regeneration

Na Xu 1, Brittany A Gonzalez 1, Katherine E Yutzey 1,*
PMCID: PMC13551468  NIHMSID: NIHMS2205169  PMID: 38556420

Abstract

During development, macrophage subpopulations derived from hematopoietic progenitors take up residence in the developing heart. Embryonic macrophages are detectable at the early stages of heart formation in the nascent myocardium, valves and coronary vasculature. The specific subtypes of macrophages present in the developing heart reflect the generation of hematopoietic progenitors in the yolk sac, aorta-gonad-mesonephros, fetal liver, and postnatal bone marrow. Ablation studies have demonstrated specific requirements for embryonic macrophages in valve remodeling, coronary and lymphatic vessel development, specialized conduction system maturation, and myocardial regeneration after neonatal injury. The developmental origins of macrophage lineages changes over time, with embryonic lineages having more reparative and remodeling functions in comparison to the bone marrow derived myeloid lineages of adults. Here we review the contributions and functions of cardiac macrophages in the developing heart with potential regenerative and reparative implications for cardiovascular disease.

Keywords: heart development, macrophage, valve remodeling, coronary vasculature, cardiac lymphatic vessels, heart regeneration

Introduction

The contribution of macrophage lineages to the development of the heart is a relatively recent area of focus, with emerging data on critical roles in coronary and lymphatic vessel development and postnatal heart regeneration. In the past few years, there is increasing appreciation of multiple macrophage lineages with origins and gene expression profiles that change during embryonic and fetal development, as well as after birth, in the myocardium and heart valves with roles in tissue homeostasis and injury response. Here, we focus on macrophage lineages which have been identified to be critical in the developing cardiovascular system. While single cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) of embryonic hearts provides evidence for other immune cell types, including B-cells and T-cells, even less is known of the functions and contributions of these cell types to the developing heart (Feng et al., 2022). The most well-defined functions of macrophages in heart development are in coronary vessel remodeling and in the nodes of the specialized conduction system (Hulsmans et al., 2017; Leid et al., 2016). A caveat is that most information is based on studies in mice, although immune cells have been noted in single cell gene profiling of embryonic chicken hearts and fetal human hearts (Mantri et al., 2021; Miao et al., 2020). While the functions of macrophages in the developing cardiovascular system are beginning to be discovered, much remains unknown as to how they contribute to specific cell functions with dynamic regulation over time.

Macrophage lineage transitions in the developing heart

During mammalian embryonic development, hematopoietic cells, including macrophages, are generated first in yolk sac (YS) endothelial cells beginning at ~embryonic day (E)7.5 in mice, followed by definitive hematopoiesis in aorta-gonad-mesonephros (AGM) beginning at ~E10.5, and then in the fetal liver after ~E12.5 (Ginhoux and Guilliams, 2016; Lee and Ginhoux, 2022; Liu et al., 2022). At the same time, the heart begins to form with the initial differentiation of the cardiac crescent at approximately E7.5, followed by formation of the beating looped heart tube at E10.5, and the beginning of atrioventricular septation at E12.5 (Buckingham et al., 2005; Evans et al., 2010). By E10.5, there is a functional cardiovascular system evident in unidirectional blood flow through the heart and vessels that is essential for embryonic viability. Postnatally, the main source of new myeloid lineage immune cells shifts to the bone marrow by approximately one month after birth (Epelman et al., 2014; Ginhoux and Guilliams, 2016; Gula and Ratajska, 2022). Thus, there are three waves of hematopoiesis with origins in the embryonic YS/AGM, fetal liver, and postnatal bone marrow (Lee and Ginhoux, 2022). Improved lineage analysis with sophisticated mouse genetic tools has provided more details and higher resolution information on where and when macrophages arise and are present in the developing heart (Liu et al., 2022).

With the initiation of cardiovascular function, hematopoietic cells, primarily macrophages from the YS and AGM, circulate throughout the embryo and take up residence in multiple organs, including the heart (Figure 1). The initial cardiac macrophages were identified as expressing the surface antigen F4/80 at E10.5 and increase up to E14.5, predominantly on the surface of the heart in the subepicardial space (Balmer et al., 2014; Gula et al., 2021; Liu et al., 2022). F4/80 positive macrophages also are present within the myocardium and developing valves in proximity to endocardial endothelial cells at E12.5-E15.5 (Liu et al., 2022). Valvular macrophages were initially reported to arise from hemogenic endocardial endothelial cells based on Nuclear Factor of Activated T-cells 1 (Nfatc1)-Cre lineage positivity and Runx1 immunostaining (Shigeta et al., 2019). Subsequent lineage tracing with Nfatc1-Cre inducible lines demonstrated recombination in endothelial cells of the YS and AGM, as well as circulating white blood cells, supporting extracardiac origin of resident cardiac macrophages (Liu et al., 2022). Likewise, cardiac macrophages are not labeled with natriuretic peptide receptor 3 (Npr3)+ endocardial and Wilm’s tumor 1 (WT1)+ epicardial-derived Cre+ lineages or an intercellular genetic tracing system for endocardial-derived lineage cells, further supporting their extracardiac origin (Liu et al., 2022) (Liu et al., 2023). However, these studies are limited by the specificity and efficiency of the Cre-driver lines and could miss a rare population of valvular macrophages that arise from adjacent hemogenic endothelial progenitors (Nakano and Liu, 2023). Altogether, the lineage tracing studies demonstrate that the vast majority of embryonic cardiac macrophages arise from primitive and definitive hematopoiesis from the YS and AGM-derived progenitors. These tissue resident macrophages persist after birth and self-renew by proliferation alongside infiltrating bone marrow-derived myeloid lineage cells present in mature organs (Molawi et al., 2014; Sattler and Rosenthal, 2016).

Figure 1. Macrophages in heart development.

Figure 1.

The timing of mouse development, hematopoiesis, and macrophage lineages in the developing heart is shown from embryonic day (E)7.5 to the postnatal period. Primitive hematopoiesis occurs in the yolk sac and initiates at E7.5, followed by definitive hematopoiesis in aorta-gonad-mesonephros (AGM) at E10.5, fetal liver at E12.5, and bone marrow after birth. Erythro-myeloid progenitors from yolk sac, AGM, and fetal liver express cKIT and Csf1r. The Cx3Cr1+ macrophage progenitors are present in the yolk sac as early as E8.5. They circulate throughout the embryo and take up residence in the heart as tissue-resident macrophages. The yolk sac/AGM-derived macrophages are detected in the heart by E10.5 indicated by expression of Cx3Cr1, Csf1r, and F4/80. Fetal liver-derived macrophages in the heart express low F4/80 and high CD11b after E12.5. Monocyte-derived macrophages from bone marrow express CCR2 and MHCII and are present in the heart few weeks after birth.

Various markers have been used to identify macrophage lineage subtypes and origins in the developing heart (Figure 1). The earliest multipotential erythro-myeloid progenitors (EMPs) in the YS and AGM express the receptor tyrosine kinase cKIT and macrophage colony stimulating factor 1 receptor (Csf1r). Subsequent immature macrophage progenitors express the fractalkine receptor C-X3-C motif chemokine receptor 1 (Cx3Cr1), which has been used to track and manipulate early macrophage lineage cells. Cx3Cr1 lineage cells are present in the YS as early as E8.5, are detected in circulating blood by E9, and infiltrate target organs, including the heart, soon thereafter (Stremmel et al., 2018). Differentiated tissue resident macrophages express the marker F4/80 and these cells are present in epicardial, endocardial and valvular regions of the heart by E10.5 (Gula et al., 2021; Liu et al., 2022). After E12.5, fetal liver-derived monocytes present in the heart express low levels of F4/80, but highly express the more mature surface integrin CD11b, as detected by fluorescent cell sorting (Epelman et al., 2014). Additional subtypes of macrophages express Ly6c hi/lo and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) II (Epelman et al., 2014). The YS-derived resident tissue macrophages persist throughout development, self-renew and are maintained in the heart, more than most other organs, as part of the innate immune system in adults (Epelman et al., 2014; Lee and Ginhoux, 2022).

In the weeks after birth, bone marrow hematopoietic stem cells mature to produce multiple myeloid lineages, including circulating monocyte-derived macrophages, that migrate to target organs, including the heart. Myeloid lineage investment is dependent on expression of the CC-motif chemokine receptor 2 (CCR2) that recognizes chemokines including CC-motif chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2), also called monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) (Epelman et al., 2014). Within the heart, these bone marrow-derived cells express higher levels of MHCII and CD206 than embryonic YS-derived macrophages and are detectable few weeks after birth in mice. (Epelman et al., 2014; Hulin et al., 2019; Molawi et al., 2014).

Single cell transcriptomic analysis of developing and neonatal hearts confirms presence of multiple immune cell lineages in mice, humans, and chicken embryos (Cui et al., 2019; Mantri et al., 2021; Mehdiabadi et al., 2022; Quaife-Ryan et al., 2017). In mouse embryos, clusters of cells with immune signatures are present by E10.5 and express myeloid markers Csf1r and Cx3Cr1 (Cahill et al., 2021). By spatial transcriptomics of chicken embryo hearts, immune cells consist of predominantly macrophages and dendritic cells within the epicardium and valve regions, distinct from circulating blood within the heart chambers as indicated by erythrocyte gene expression profiles (Mantri et al., 2021). At later fetal and postnatal stages in mice, B, T, and NK cells, as well as mast cells, are present in myocardial tissue, in addition to prevalent myeloid lineage macrophages and dendritic cells (Skelly et al., 2018; Suryawanshi et al., 2020). In postnatal mice, immune cells make up ~10% cells of remodeling heart valves at P7 and P30, consisting predominantly of macrophages, with additional B, T, dendritic and mast cells (Hulin et al., 2019). Likewise, in the developing myocardium, single cell RNAseq analysis has identified multiple immune cell types, including macrophages, as being present, but relative numbers and macrophage subtypes are yet to be reported using this approach (Feng et al., 2022). In the whole adult mouse heart, immune cells defined as expressing the hematopoietic cell marker CD45 make up ~5-10% of noncardiomyocytes (Pinto et al., 2016), and most of the CD45+ cells are macrophages (Cahill et al., 2021). Thus, diverse populations of immune cells, predominantly macrophages, are present in the developing and mature heart as detected by single cell transcriptomic studies.

Contributions of macrophage lineages to cardiac organogenesis

Cardiac macrophages were first identified morphologically in electron microscopy studies and associated with regions of cell death in the outflow tract and epicardium (Manasek, 1969; Pexieder, 1975). In embryonic rat heart organ cultures beginning at E12, macrophages identified by expression of Griffonia simplicifolia isolectin B4 (GAS) were detected in the subepicardial region of the outflow tract and have phagocytic activity prior to apoptotic activity (Sorokin et al., 1994). More recently, myocardial macrophages were identified by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and categorized into subpopulations by surface markers related to developmental origins (Epelman et al., 2014).

While extensive data are available on the presence and diversity of macrophage populations in the developing heart, less is known of their specific functions in cardiac organogenesis. It has been hypothesized that cardiac resident macrophages have phagocytic functions related to clearing apoptotic cells and tissue remodeling, but this has not been demonstrated definitively (Gula and Ratajska, 2022). Dynamic regulation of tissue resident macrophage subpopulations and localization has been demonstrated in endocardial cushions and remodeling heart valves, but their contributions to heart valve development are not fully known (Liu et al., 2022; Shigeta et al., 2019). On the surface of the developing myocardium, CD45+ immune cells, also positive for the monocyte marker CD68 and lymphatic vessel endothelial HA-receptor (Lyve1), are present in the subepicardial space and have been implicated in coronary vessel remodeling and lymphatic endothelial cell plexus formation (Balmer et al., 2014; Cahill et al., 2021; Gula et al., 2021; Leid et al., 2016). Surface macrophages are also located in the outflow tract near regions of apoptosis, but specific functions in tissue remodeling have not been demonstrated (Gula et al., 2021). Cell lineage analysis and ablation studies also demonstrated a requirement for macrophages in formation and function of the atrioventricular node of the cardiac conduction system (Hulsmans et al., 2017). Together, these studies provide initial evidence for diverse regulatory functions of macrophages in tissue remodeling and maturation of cardiac valves, vasculature, and specialized conduction system necessary for organogenesis and function of the heart (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Contributions of macrophages to cardiac organogenesis.

Figure 2.

The cardiac resident macrophages contribute to multiple cardiovascular developmental processes, including heart valve development, coronary and lymphatic vessel remodeling, and specialized conduction system function. In the developing valves, macrophages expressing CD68, F4/80, and Csf1r are present in proximity to the endocardium. During coronary and lymphatic vessel remodeling, macrophages localized in the subepicardial space express LYVE, CD64, CD206, Cx3Cr1, F4/80, and Csf1r, are required for vascular development. In addition, macrophages expressing Cx3Cr1, CCR2, and Csf1r are detected in the atrioventricular node. Gap junction connexin 43 (Cx43) gene expression in Cx3Cr1+ macrophages contributes to specialized cardiac conduction system function.

Valve remodeling and maturation

In developing and remodeling heart valves, immune cell subtypes and localization are dynamically regulated from endocardial cushion formation to postnatal valve remodeling and adult homeostasis. In the embryo, macrophages expressing CD68, derived from the Csf1r erythroid-myeloid progenitor lineage, are present in association with endocardium in the endocardial cushions as early as E10.5 (Shigeta et al., 2019). Subsequently, macrophages expressing F4/80 are localized in proximity to the endocardium in endocardial cushions and valve primordia of atrioventricular and semilunar valves at E12.5-15.5 (Liu et al., 2022). Shigeta et al. demonstrated that endocardial cushion macrophages are derived from Nfatc1Cre-labeled lineage cells, originally reported as arising from within the endocardium (Shigeta et al., 2019). Using more refined lineage analysis with multiple inducible driver lines, Zhou et al. demonstrated that Nfatc1Cre lineage cells are not exclusively of endocardial origin and that cardiac macrophages are of YS and AGM, not endocardial endothelial, hematopoietic origins (Liu et al., 2022; Liu et al., 2023). During embryogenesis, Shigeta et al also demonstrated that loss of cardiac macrophages in Nfatc1Cre;Csf1rfl/fl mice resulted in endocardial cushion and valve remodeling defects, supporting a role for macrophages in valve leaflet maturation (Shigeta et al., 2019). A caveat of this study is that Nfatc1Cre-mediated loss of Csf1r likely occurs in YS hematopoietic cell progenitors, and thus may affect multiple myeloid and erythroid progenitors in the blood and other organs (Liu et al., 2022; Stremmel et al., 2018). However, these studies do support contributions of Csf1r-lineage cells to prenatal heart valve maturation.

In valves after birth, the markers of macrophage subpopulations and activation status change over time in parallel with maturation of bone marrow-derived myeloid lineages (Hulin et al., 2018). During valve remodeling, myeloid lineage cells are localized in areas of stress, at the distal tips and areas of coaptation, notably in semilunar valves (Hulin et al., 2018). Both resident and bone marrow-derived macrophage lineages are present in mature valves with unknown function (Hulin et al., 2019). Interestingly, loss of postnatal bone marrow-derived myeloid cells in CCR2 knockout mice did not obviously affect normal valve leaflet remodeling or extracellular matrix stratification, but they are required for myxomatous disease progression in a mouse model of Marfan Syndrome (Kim et al., 2020; Kim et al., 2021). Moreover, inhibition of CCR2 through treatment of MFS mice with the CCR2 antagonist RS504393 prevents and potentially reverses inflammation and myxomatous valve disease progression, suggesting a promising new anti-inflammatory therapeutic approach for valve disease (Xu and Yutzey, 2022). However, the specific functions of macrophage subpopulations in normal valve development, postnatal remodeling, and disease progression remain unknown.

Coronary and lymphatic vessel development

The coronary and lymphatic vessels of the heart initially develop on the epicardial surface as a result of sprouting from existing endothelial populations (Trimm and Red-Horse, 2023). Soon after formation of the epicardial layer that covers the heart, macrophages are present in the space between the epicardium and myocardium. At E12.5, LYVE+/CD64+ macrophages are present in the subepicardial space, and at E16, macrophage numbers are increased with expression of the maturation marker CD206+ (Gula et al., 2021). Similarly, Cx3Cr1+ lineage cells are present on the epicardial surface beginning at E12.5, express the F4/80 marker indicative of macrophages, and increase in number between E12.5 and E14.5 (Cahill et al., 2021; Leid et al., 2016). Co-staining of the macrophage marker CD68 with endothelial marker CD31 shows that most of the macrophages in the developing heart are associated with forming vessels at E12.5-E13.5 (Stevens et al., 2016). These epicardial macrophages are of YS origin as indicated by cell lineage labeling of Csf1r myeloid progenitors present in the YS at E7.5 (Stevens et al., 2016). Moreover, ablation of the epicardium by Wilms Tumor 1 (WT1)-driven expression of diphtheria toxin antigen (DTA) beginning at E11.5 leads to reduced epicardial macrophage recruitment with corresponding reduced coronary vascular formation at E13.5 (Stevens et al., 2016). LYVE1+ stained macrophages are associated with vascular and lymphatic endothelial cells as well as bridging tips of new vessels during angiogenesis on the heart surface (Cahill et al., 2021; Gula et al., 2021). Moreover, the early CCR2-negative macrophages express insulin-like growth factor 2 (Igf2) which has proangiogenic activity (Leid et al., 2016). At later stages, CCR2+ macrophages of fetal liver origin are present in the heart and are required for coronary vascular plexus remodeling by E17.5 (Leid et al., 2016). Together these data support a role for macrophages in coronary vascular remodeling, as has been demonstrated for other remodeling vascular beds, such as in the testis and eye, during development (DeFalco et al., 2014; Lobov et al., 2005; Wu and Hirschi, 2020).

In addition to functions in coronary vessel development, embryonic epicardial macrophages have been implicated in development of the cardiac lymphatic vasculature (Cahill et al., 2021). In E16.5 hearts during lymphatic vessel remodeling, CD68+ and LYVE+ macrophages are in close association with lymphatic endothelial cells marked by Vegfr3 and Prox1 (Cahill et al., 2021). These cells are of YS/AGM and fetal liver origin as indicated by Csf1r and Cx3Cr1 lineage analysis. Ablation of Cx3Cr1 YS-derived macrophages leads to defective lymphatic vessel remodeling with associated defective coronary vein patterning (Cahill et al., 2021). Thus, resident cardiac macrophages derived from embryonic YS/AGM progenitors have critical roles in growth and remodeling of coronary arterial, venous, and lymphatic vasculature in the developing mouse heart.

Conduction system maturation and function

In addition to important roles in the vasculature, cardiac resident macrophages contribute to development of the specialized cardiac conduction system. Coordination of atrial and ventricular cardiac contractions is dependent on electrical impulses originating in the sinoatrial (SA) and atrioventricular (AV) nodes (van Weerd and Christoffels, 2016). Whole organ analysis of Cx3Cr1-Green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporter mice revealed a surprising localization of tissue resident macrophages in the AV node interspersed with conduction system cardiomyocytes (Hulsmans et al., 2017). Single cell RNAseq validated the presence of CCR2+ macrophages in the AV node, similar to ventricular myocardial macrophages that express gap junction genes including connexin 43 (Cx43). Interestingly, ablation of Cx43 in Cx3Cr1+ lineage cells in adults leads to AV block, and congenital conduction anomalies also are observed in colony stimulating factor-1/osteopetrotic (Csf1op) mice with macrophage deficiency (Hulsmans et al., 2017). While macrophages themselves facilitate conduction activity, the specific functions of macrophages in conduction system development and structural maturation are not well-defined.

Macrophages in cardiomyocyte maturation and heart regeneration after birth

The period after birth in mice is characterized by maturation and cell cycle arrest of cardiomyocytes, increased fibroblast proliferation, and ECM production, along with infiltration of bone marrow-derived monocytes that occurs with the maturation of the immune system (Hortells et al., 2019; Lavine et al., 2018; Velayutham et al., 2020). Embryonic macrophage lineages in heart muscle are expanded in the neonatal period and retain proangiogenic and reparative functions as resident macrophages in the myocardium throughout life (Lavine et al., 2014). Transcriptional analysis of sorted leucocytes from neonatal and adult hearts demonstrates developmental maturation in macrophage gene expression associated with neonatal regenerative versus adult fibrotic response after injury (Quaife-Ryan et al., 2017). Moreover, by single cell gene expression analysis there is evidence for cell-cell communication between macrophages and other cardiac cell types that increases with postnatal age and cardiac injury (Whitehead and Engler, 2021). In general, the neonatal heart has an immature adaptive immune system and reduced pro-inflammatory function in comparison to the mature heart (Sattler and Rosenthal, 2016). However, there is limited understanding of the specific contributions of embryonic macrophages and maturing myeloid lineages to postnatal heart maturation or neonatal versus adult injury response (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Contributions of macrophages to neonatal heart regeneration, adult myocardial injury, and congenital valve disease in mice.

Figure 3.

In neonatal mice, macrophages are required for angiogenesis and heart regeneration after myocardial injury. In adult mice, the heart loses regenerative capacity and myeloid monocyte-derived macrophages are recruited to the heart after myocardial infarction. Inhibition of myeloid infiltration can reduce a pathologic fibrotic response and scarring after injury. In a Fbn1C1039G/+ mouse model of Marfan syndrome with congenital mitral valve disease, monocyte-derived macrophages expressing CCR2 and MHCII are increased and contribute to the progression of disease evident in valve leaflet thickening and pathological extracellular matrix remodeling.

The neonatal mammalian heart regenerates after injury resulting in the formation of new muscle in the absence of fibrosis or scarring (Porrello et al., 2011). Approximately one week after birth in mice and pigs, the heart loses the capacity to regenerate and cardiac injury leads to fibrosis, scar formation, and dysfunction (Porrello et al., 2011; Ye et al., 2018; Zhu et al., 2018). The loss of regenerative capacity occurs at the same time as maturation of the immune system, which has been hypothesized to contribute to scarring and pathologic fibrotic response in the nonregenerative heart (Quaife-Ryan et al., 2017; Sattler and Rosenthal, 2016). In neonatal mice, inhibition of macrophage function with chlodronate liposome treatment inhibits new muscle formation after injury in the postnatal period, which was linked to macrophage-dependent angiogenesis during the regeneration process (Aurora et al., 2014). Similarly, in zebrafish that maintain a cardiac regenerative response in adults, depletion of macrophages prior to injury inhibits cardiac regeneration (Lai et al., 2019). In neonatal mice, macrophages promote cardiomyocyte proliferation and regeneration through secretion of oncostatin M that promotes cardiomyocyte Yap activation (Li et al., 2020). However, in adults proinflammatory myeloid monocyte-derived macrophages are recruited to the heart after injury and contribute to scarring and pathologic remodeling (Lavine et al., 2014). Interestingly transplantation of neonatal macrophages into adult injured myocardium promotes regenerative repair, supporting a beneficial paracrine signaling between neonatal, but not adult, cardiac macrophages and cardiomyocytes (Li et al., 2021). The apparent proregenerative capacity of neonatal resident cardiac macrophages has made them an attractive target for stimulation of cardiac repair after injury in adults (Nahrendorf, 2018).

Summary and conclusions

Changes in macrophage lineage origins, composition, and gene expression profiles have been demonstrated in the developing heart, including in the postnatal period, but there is limited knowledge on their specific functions in cardiac organogenesis.

While the requirements for macrophages have been defined, the specific cellular functions of macrophages in heart development are less well known. Initially macrophages were implicated in tissue remodeling in apoptotic regions of the heart, but phagocytic functions have not been definitively demonstrated (Manasek, 1969; Pexieder, 1975). More recently, macrophage-secreted factors, such as Igf2 or oncostatin M, have been associated with angiogenic remodeling and cardiac regeneration (Leid et al., 2016; Li et al., 2020). Single cell gene expression profiling has provided additional evidence for candidate secreted factors that mediate cell-cell interactions between macrophages and other cell types (Whitehead and Engler, 2021), which is an important area of research for future understanding of immune cell contributions to cardiac tissue remodeling and repair mechanisms. In general, specific functions and cellular contributions of macrophages to development of the heart are not well defined and need to be studied further.

Cell ablation studies have demonstrated specific requirements for embryonic macrophages in coronary and lymphatic vessel development, specialized conduction system maturation, and regeneration after neonatal injury. The developmental origins of macrophage lineages changes over time, with embryonic lineages having more reparative and remodeling functions in comparison to the more mature bone marrow derived myeloid lineages. However, embryonic macrophage lineages persist in the myocardium and heart valves as resident cardiac macrophages in adults. Thus, enhancing reparative abilities of embryonic and neonatal macrophage lineages has been invoked as a therapeutic opportunity for adult cardiac injury response (Sattler and Rosenthal, 2016). In addition, harnessing the developmental potential of macrophages also could promote cardiac angiogenesis or contribute to prevention of conduction anomalies. Conversely, genetic or pharmacologic inhibition of the chemokine receptor CCR2, preventing organ targeting of monocyte-derived macrophages, ameliorates myxomatous valve disease of Marfan syndrome, cardiac fibrosis, and atherosclerosis (Kim et al., 2020; Nahrendorf, 2018; Xu and Yutzey, 2022). Thus, inhibition of pathologic functions of mature myeloid-derived macrophages is an attractive strategy for limiting the progression of congenital valve disease or pathologic fibrotic remodeling after cardiac injury (Figure 3).

Despite extensive macrophage lineage tracing and ablation studies, there is limited information on their specific functions and mechanistic contributions to cardiac organogenesis and heart maturation after birth. This is likely due to the necessity of systemic macrophages for postnatal viability, together with the relative inability to conditionally target macrophage subpopulations in specific organs. In addition, increased knowledge of neonatal heart immune cell subpopulations and gene expression profiles at the single cell level also are needed. There is great interest in recapitulating neonatal macrophage contributions to promote more effective adult cardiac repair after injury (Nahrendorf, 2018; Simões and Riley, 2022). Thus, lessons from embryonic macrophage contributions to developmental remodeling and myocardial repair may lead to new therapeutic strategies in treatment of cardiovascular disease.

Acknowledgements

Figures were created with the assistance of BioRender.com. Funding was provided by NIH R01 HL156270 and R01HL143881 to K.E.Y., American Heart Association Career Development Award 933278 to N.X., NIH F32 HL168787 and 23POST1019132 to B.A.G.

References

  1. Aurora AB, Porrello ER, Tan W, Mahmoud AI, Hill JA, Bassel-Duby R, Sadek HA, Olson EN, 2014. Macrophages are required for neonatal heart regeneration. J Clin Invest 124, 1382–1392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Balmer GM, Bollini S, Dubé KN, Martinez-Barbera JP, Williams O, Riley PR, 2014. Dynamic haematopoietic cell contribution to the developing and adult epicardium. Nat Commun 5, 4054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Buckingham M, Meilhac S, Zaffran S, 2005. Building the mammalian heart from two sources of myocardial cells. Nat Rev Genet 6, 826–835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cahill TJ, Sun X, Ravaud C, Villa Del Campo C, Klaourakis K, Lupu IE, Lord AM, Browne C, Jacobsen SEW, Greaves DR, Jackson DG, Cowley SA, James W, Choudhury RP, Vieira JM, Riley PR, 2021. Tissue-resident macrophages regulate lymphatic vessel growth and patterning in the developing heart. Development 148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cui Y, Zheng Y, Liu X, Yan L, Fan X, Yong J, Hu Y, Dong J, Li Q, Wu X, Gao S, Li J, Wen L, Qiao J, Tang F, 2019. Single-Cell Transcriptome Analysis Maps the Developmental Track of the Human Heart. Cell Rep 26, 1934–1950.e1935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. DeFalco T, Bhattacharya I, Williams AV, Sams DM, Capel B, 2014. Yolk-sac-derived macrophages regulate fetal testis vascularization and morphogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111, E2384–2393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Epelman S, Lavine KJ, Beaudin AE, Sojka DK, Carrero JA, Calderon B, Brija T, Gautier EL, Ivanov S, Satpathy AT, Schilling JD, Schwendener R, Sergin I, Razani B, Forsberg EC, Yokoyama WM, Unanue ER, Colonna M, Randolph GJ, Mann DL, 2014. Embryonic and adult-derived resident cardiac macrophages are maintained through distinct mechanisms at steady state and during inflammation. Immunity 40, 91–104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Evans SM, Yelon D, Conlon FL, Kirby ML, 2010. Myocardial lineage development. Circ Res 107, 1428–1444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Feng W, Bais A, He H, Rios C, Jiang S, Xu J, Chang C, Kostka D, Li G, 2022. Single-cell transcriptomic analysis identifies murine heart molecular features at embryonic and neonatal stages. Nature Communications 13, 7960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ginhoux F, Guilliams M, 2016. Tissue-Resident Macrophage Ontogeny and Homeostasis. Immunity 44, 439–449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gula G, Ratajska A, 2022. Novel insights into embryonic cardiac macrophages. Dev Biol 488, 1–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gula G, Rumiński S, Niderla-Bielińska J, Jasińska A, Kiernozek E, Jankowska-Steifer E, Flaht-Zabost A, Ratajska A, 2021. Potential functions of embryonic cardiac macrophages in angiogenesis, lymphangiogenesis and extracellular matrix remodeling. Histochem Cell Biol 155, 117–132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hortells L, Johansen AKZ, Yutzey KE, 2019. Cardiac Fibroblasts and the Extracellular Matrix in Regenerative and Nonregenerative Hearts. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis 6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hulin A, Anstine LJ, Kim AJ, Potter SJ, DeFalco T, Lincoln J, Yutzey KE, 2018. Macrophage Transitions in Heart Valve Development and Myxomatous Valve Disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 38, 636–644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hulin A, Hortells L, Gomez-Stallons MV, O’Donnell A, Chetal K, Adam M, Lancellotti P, Oury C, Potter SS, Salomonis N, Yutzey KE, 2019. Maturation of heart valve cell populations during postnatal remodeling. Development 146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hulsmans M, Clauss S, Xiao L, Aguirre AD, King KR, Hanley A, Hucker WJ, Wülfers EM, Seemann G, Courties G, Iwamoto Y, Sun Y, Savol AJ, Sager HB, Lavine KJ, Fishbein GA, Capen DE, Da Silva N, Miquerol L, Wakimoto H, Seidman CE, Seidman JG, Sadreyev RI, Naxerova K, Mitchell RN, Brown D, Libby P, Weissleder R, Swirski FK, Kohl P, Vinegoni C, Milan DJ, Ellinor PT, Nahrendorf M, 2017. Macrophages Facilitate Electrical Conduction in the Heart. Cell 169, 510–522.e520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kim AJ, Xu N, Umeyama K, Hulin A, Ponny SR, Vagnozzi RJ, Green EA, Hanson P, McManus BM, Nagashima H, Yutzey KE, 2020. Deficiency of Circulating Monocytes Ameliorates the Progression of Myxomatous Valve Degeneration in Marfan Syndrome. Circulation 141, 132–146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kim AJ, Xu N, Yutzey KE, 2021. Macrophage lineages in heart valve development and disease. Cardiovasc Res 117, 663–673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lai SL, Marín-Juez R, Stainier DYR, 2019. Immune responses in cardiac repair and regeneration: a comparative point of view. Cell Mol Life Sci 76, 1365–1380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lavine KJ, Epelman S, Uchida K, Weber KJ, Nichols CG, Schilling JD, Ornitz DM, Randolph GJ, Mann DL, 2014. Distinct macrophage lineages contribute to disparate patterns of cardiac recovery and remodeling in the neonatal and adult heart. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111, 16029–16034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lavine KJ, Pinto AR, Epelman S, Kopecky BJ, Clemente-Casares X, Godwin J, Rosenthal N, Kovacic JC, 2018. The Macrophage in Cardiac Homeostasis and Disease: JACC Macrophage in CVD Series (Part 4). J Am Coll Cardiol 72, 2213–2230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lee CZW, Ginhoux F, 2022. Biology of resident tissue macrophages. Development 149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Leid J, Carrelha J, Boukarabila H, Epelman S, Jacobsen SE, Lavine KJ, 2016. Primitive Embryonic Macrophages are Required for Coronary Development and Maturation. Circ Res 118, 1498–1511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Li Y, Feng J, Song S, Li H, Yang H, Zhou B, Li Y, Yue Z, Lian H, Liu L, Hu S, Nie Y, 2020. gp130 Controls Cardiomyocyte Proliferation and Heart Regeneration. Circulation 142, 967–982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Li Y, Li H, Pei J, Hu S, Nie Y, 2021. Transplantation of murine neonatal cardiac macrophage improves adult cardiac repair. Cell Mol Immunol 18, 492–494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Liu K, Jin H, Tang M, Zhang S, Tian X, Zhang M, Han X, Liu X, Tang J, Pu W, Li Y, He L, Yang Z, Lui KO, Zhou B, 2022. Lineage tracing clarifies the cellular origin of tissue-resident macrophages in the developing heart. J Cell Biol 221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Liu K, Jin H, Zhang S, Tang M, Meng X, Li Y, Pu W, Lui KO, Zhou B, 2023. Intercellular genetic tracing of cardiac endothelium in the developing heart. Dev Cell 58, 1502–1512.e1503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lobov IB, Rao S, Carroll TJ, Vallance JE, Ito M, Ondr JK, Kurup S, Glass DA, Patel MS, Shu W, Morrisey EE, McMahon AP, Karsenty G, Lang RA, 2005. WNT7b mediates macrophage-induced programmed cell death in patterning of the vasculature. Nature 437, 417–421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Manasek FJ, 1969. Myocardial cell death in the embryonic chick ventricle. J Embryol Exp Morphol 21, 271–284. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Mantri M, Scuderi GJ, Abedini-Nassab R, Wang MFZ, McKellar D, Shi H, Grodner B, Butcher JT, De Vlaminck I, 2021. Spatiotemporal single-cell RNA sequencing of developing chicken hearts identifies interplay between cellular differentiation and morphogenesis. Nat Commun 12, 1771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Mehdiabadi NR, Boon Sim C, Phipson B, Kalathur RKR, Sun Y, Vivien CJ, Ter Huurne M, Piers AT, Hudson JE, Oshlack A, Weintraub RG, Konstantinov IE, Palpant NJ, Elliott DA, Porrello ER, 2022. Defining the Fetal Gene Program at Single-Cell Resolution in Pediatric Dilated Cardiomyopathy. Circulation 146, 1105–1108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Miao Y, Tian L, Martin M, Paige SL, Galdos FX, Li J, Klein A, Zhang H, Ma N, Wei Y, Stewart M, Lee S, Moonen JR, Zhang B, Grossfeld P, Mital S, Chitayat D, Wu JC, Rabinovitch M, Nelson TJ, Nie S, Wu SM, Gu M, 2020. Intrinsic Endocardial Defects Contribute to Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome. Cell Stem Cell 27, 574–589.e578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Molawi K, Wolf Y, Kandalla PK, Favret J, Hagemeyer N, Frenzel K, Pinto AR, Klapproth K, Henri S, Malissen B, Rodewald HR, Rosenthal NA, Bajenoff M, Prinz M, Jung S, Sieweke MH, 2014. Progressive replacement of embryo-derived cardiac macrophages with age. J Exp Med 211, 2151–2158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Nahrendorf M, 2018. Myeloid cell contributions to cardiovascular health and disease. Nat Med 24, 711–720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Nakano A, Liu N, 2023. Response to Matters Arising: Intercellular genetic tracing of cardiac endothelium in the developing heart. Dev Cell 58, 1513–1514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Pexieder T, 1975. Cell death in the morphogenesis and teratogenesis of the heart. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol 51, 3–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Pinto AR, Ilinykh A, Ivey MJ, Kuwabara JT, D’Antoni ML, Debuque R, Chandran A, Wang L, Arora K, Rosenthal NA, Tallquist MD, 2016. Revisiting Cardiac Cellular Composition. Circ Res 118, 400–409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Porrello ER, Mahmoud AI, Simpson E, Hill JA, Richardson JA, Olson EN, Sadek HA, 2011. Transient regenerative potential of the neonatal mouse heart. Science 331, 1078–1080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Quaife-Ryan GA, Sim CB, Ziemann M, Kaspi A, Rafehi H, Ramialison M, El-Osta A, Hudson JE, Porrello ER, 2017. Multicellular Transcriptional Analysis of Mammalian Heart Regeneration. Circulation 136, 1123–1139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Sattler S, Rosenthal N, 2016. The neonate versus adult mammalian immune system in cardiac repair and regeneration. Biochim Biophys Acta 1863, 1813–1821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Shigeta A, Huang V, Zuo J, Besada R, Nakashima Y, Lu Y, Ding Y, Pellegrini M, Kulkarni RP, Hsiai T, Deb A, Zhou B, Nakano H, Nakano A, 2019. Endocardially Derived Macrophages Are Essential for Valvular Remodeling. Dev Cell 48, 617–630.e613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Simóes FC, Riley PR, 2022. Immune cells in cardiac repair and regeneration. Development 149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Skelly DA, Squiers GT, McLellan MA, Bolisetty MT, Robson P, Rosenthal NA, Pinto AR, 2018. Single-Cell Transcriptional Profiling Reveals Cellular Diversity and Intercommunication in the Mouse Heart. Cell Rep 22, 600–610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Sorokin SP, McNelly NA, Hoyt RF Jr., 1994. Early development of macrophages in intact and organ cultured hearts of rat embryos. Anat Rec 239, 306–314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Stevens SM, von Gise A, VanDusen N, Zhou B, Pu WT, 2016. Epicardium is required for cardiac seeding by yolk sac macrophages, precursors of resident macrophages of the adult heart. Dev Biol 413, 153–159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Stremmel C, Schuchert R, Wagner F, Thaler R, Weinberger T, Pick R, Mass E, Ishikawa-Ankerhold HC, Margraf A, Hutter S, Vagnozzi R, Klapproth S, Frampton J, Yona S, Scheiermann C, Molkentin JD, Jeschke U, Moser M, Sperandio M, Massberg S, Geissmann F, Schulz C, 2018. Yolk sac macrophage progenitors traffic to the embryo during defined stages of development. Nat Commun 9, 75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Suryawanshi H, Clancy R, Morozov P, Halushka MK, Buyon JP, Tuschl T, 2020. Cell atlas of the foetal human heart and implications for autoimmune-mediated congenital heart block. Cardiovasc Res 116, 1446–1457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Trimm E, Red-Horse K, 2023. Vascular endothelial cell development and diversity. Nat Rev Cardiol 20, 197–210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. van Weerd JH, Christoffels VM, 2016. The formation and function of the cardiac conduction system. Development 143, 197–210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Velayutham N, Alfieri CM, Agnew EJ, Riggs KW, Baker RS, Ponny SR, Zafar F, Yutzey KE, 2020. Cardiomyocyte cell cycling, maturation, and growth by multinucleation in postnatal swine. J Mol Cell Cardiol 146, 95–108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Whitehead AJ, Engler AJ, 2021. Regenerative cross talk between cardiac cells and macrophages. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 320, H2211–h2221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Wu Y, Hirschi KK, 2020. Tissue-Resident Macrophage Development and Function. Front Cell Dev Biol 8, 617879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Xu N, Yutzey KE, 2022. Therapeutic CCR2 Blockade Prevents Inflammation and Alleviates Myxomatous Valve Disease in Marfan Syndrome. JACC Basic Transl Sci 7, 1143–1157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Ye L, D’Agostino G, Loo SJ, Wang CX, Su LP, Tan SH, Tee GZ, Pua CJ, Pena EM, Cheng RB, Chen WC, Abdurrachim D, Lalic J, Tan RS, Lee TH, Zhang J, Cook SA, 2018. Early Regenerative Capacity in the Porcine Heart. Circulation 138, 2798–2808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Zhu W, Zhang E, Zhao M, Chong Z, Fan C, Tang Y, Hunter JD, Borovjagin AV, Walcott GP, Chen JY, Qin G, Zhang J, 2018. Regenerative Potential of Neonatal Porcine Hearts. Circulation 138, 2809–2816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES