Skip to main content
Nature Portfolio logoLink to Nature Portfolio
. 2026 Mar 5;33(4):448–461. doi: 10.1038/s41434-026-00599-0

In vitro and in vivo rescue of dopaminergic neurons in Parkinson’s disease models after Parkin gene therapy

Takeshi Hioki 1,✉,#, Masaaki Nishimura 1,#, Xiuxia Sun 2, Sarah Melissa Jacobo 2, Miyu Nakayama 1, Mitsuhiro Nishihara 1, Kimio Tohyama 1, Po-Ting Liu 2, Takuro Okai 1, Maiko Tanaka 1, Gabriele Proetzel 2
PMCID: PMC13472879  PMID: 41786869

Abstract

Young-onset Parkinson’s disease (PD), the most common autosomal recessive familial PD, is caused by gene mutations in Parkin (PRKN). These mutations result in Parkin protein loss and reduced enzymatic activity, leading to severe degeneration of dopamine-producing neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc). Adeno-associated virus (AAV) gene therapy can directly address the cause of PRKN-PD by expressing Parkin protein at levels comparable to those observed in healthy humans. AAV9 vectors with different promoters were engineered to deliver PRKN cDNA with efficient human Parkin (hParkin) expression in dopaminergic (DA) neurons as shown in PRKN-null human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) derived DA neurons. Further, we show that AAV9-PRKN treatment can protect nigral DA neurons in two mouse PD models, the 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA)-lesion and the α-synuclein (α-Syn) pre-formed fibrils (PFFs)-lesion model. In summary, AAV9-PRKN gene therapy demonstrates neuroprotective properties and may represent a promising approach for PRKN-PD, with potential broader applications in idiopathic PD and other neurodegenerative diseases.

Subject terms: Cell death in the nervous system, CNS cancer

Introduction

Parkinson’s disease (PD) caused by Parkin (PRKN or PARK2) gene mutations is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder, abbreviated as PRKN-PD, characterized by tremor, rigidity, and bradykinesia arising from dopamine deficiency and gradual loss of dopaminergic (DA) neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc) and their corresponding axonal projections in the striatum [1]. PRKN-PD accounts for about 80% of juvenile (onset before age 20) and 50% of early-onset Parkinsonism (onset before age 45) [2, 3]. This autosomal recessive monogenic disorder is caused by homozygous or compound heterozygous mutations in the PRKN gene [4]. More than 100 pathological PRKN mutations leading to loss of function have been reported [5, 6]. PRKN-PD patients suffer from PD symptoms for a long time, frequently spanning more than 50 years as the onset of symptoms can manifest as early as 3 years of age, with a median age of onset of 31 years [7]. PRKN-PD patients endure a significant decline in their quality of life during their prime years. The current standard of care relies on dopamine therapy; however, this often leads to early motor fluctuations (wearing-off phenomenon) with about 80% PRKN-PD patients experiencing disabling levodopa-induced dyskinesias [8, 9]. Today, there are no approved therapies that modify the course of PRKN-PD or the underlying pathological processes. These limitations underscore the urgent need to develop disease modifying or curative treatments for PRKN-PD.

PRKN encodes an intracellular 465-amino-acid Parkin RBR E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase that functions within the ubiquitin-proteasome system. PRKN plays a crucial role in mitophagy, regulates protein homeostasis and cellular stress responses, preventing the accumulation of toxic proteins associated with neurodegeneration. Cytosolic Parkin is activated by PTEN-induced kinase-1 (PINK1) and translocates to the outer mitochondrial membrane upon mitochondrial depolarization signals [10, 11]. Parkin amplifies poly phospho-ubiquitin (poly-pUb) chains on the mitochondria in cooperation with PINK1 and recruits proteins of the ubiquitin-proteasome systems and autophagy machinery to mediate the clearance of damaged mitochondria, a process known as mitophagy [12–15].

Parkin can promote neuronal cell survival through multiple mechanisms, including mitophagy [16]. Proper mitochondrial function is crucial for maintaining cellular homeostasis, and disruptions of this process can lead to the accumulation of damaged mitochondria, oxidative stress, and impaired energy production, ultimately contributing to the degeneration of neurons.

Pathological mutations lead to a premature stop codon, reduced protein stability, or decreased enzyme activity, resulting in a loss of Parkin protein and/or its enzyme activity, which has been detected in postmortem brains of PRKN-PD patients [17–19]. Loss of Parkin function, as seen in PRKN-PD, leads to impaired mitophagy, mitochondrial dysfunction, and increased oxidative stress, driving the degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in PD. One consequence of PRKN loss is dysfunction in mitochondrial quality control, particularly impaired mitophagy, which is considered a central mechanism underlying neuronal loss in PRKN-PD [20]. Post-mortem brain analysis of PRKN-PD patients shows regionally restricted neuropathology, characterized by mitochondrial stress and loss of DA neurons in the SNpc, in contrast to idiopathic PD, where cortical neurons are also depleted [18, 19, 21].

Previous studies have demonstrated that adeno-associated virus (AAV)-mediated PRKN can reduce DA neuronal loss in rodent models, although the effect size varied across studies [22–24]. Due to differences in laboratories, vectors, and regulatory elements, direct comparison is challenging.

Here, we assess the impact of ubiquitous and neuronal promoters on PRKN expression and mitophagy induction in human iPSC-derived DA (iPSC-DA) neuronal assays. Additionally, we evaluate the neuroprotective effects of one selected AAV vector driven by a neuronal promoter in two PD mouse models, the 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA)-lesion and the α-synuclein pre-formed fibrils (α-Syn PFFs)-lesion PD model.

The 6-OHDA lesion model is widely used to study PD, as the neurotoxin 6-OHDA selectively destroys dopaminergic neurons, resembling aspects of the dopaminergic cell loss seen in PD. Previous studies have demonstrated neuroprotection by Parkin overexpression in the 6-OHDA model [25, 26], supporting the relevance for evaluating novel Parkin gene therapies in this model. In this model, a unilateral lesion targeting the medial forebrain bundle (MFB) results in DA neuronal loss in the targeted hemisphere [27].

In addition to the acute 6-OHDA-lesion model, we used the α-Syn PFFs-lesion model [28], which recapitulates the progressive accumulation and spread of misfolded proteins, followed by gradual DA neuronal loss as seen in idiopathic PD. This model is considered chronic and reflects the disease’s slow and spreading pathology. Although PRKN-PD patients typically show minimal or no α-synuclein pathology, the α-Syn PFF model was used to evaluate the broader therapeutic potential of PRKN gene therapy in idiopathic PD, where α-synuclein pathology is central.

Our novel AAV vector showed efficacy in both mouse models. Together, these findings suggest that AAV-mediated delivery of PRKN to the substantia nigra (SN) may slow disease progression and potentially improve function in PRKN-PD by directly addressing the cause of disease in PRKN-PD. These results support the therapeutic potential of targeted PKRN gene therapy for modifying disease course in PRKN-PD, with possible relevance to broader forms of PD.

Materials and Methods

Preparation of PRKN expression plasmids

All expression plasmids were designed by the authors and were produced at GeneWiz (South Plainfield, NJ, USA). Expression cassettes consist of promoter, intron, human PRKN cDNA (NM_004562.3, transcript variant 1, PRKN-206) (1398 base pairs (bp)), and human growth hormone poly A (477 bp), which was inserted in pUC57. For promoters, chicken β-actin hybrid (CBh, 822 bp) [29], human Elongation Factor 1 alpha (EF1α, 1187 bp) [30], the short, intron-less variant of EF1α (EFS, 232 bp) [31], human phosphoglycerate kinase 1 (PGK1, 511 bp) [32], human synapsin 1 (SYN1, 469 bp) [33], mouse Calcium–calmodulin-dependent protein kinase IIα (CaMKIIα, 1289 bp) [34], human tyrosine hydroxylase (TH, 521 bp) [35], and native human PRKN promoters (339 bp upstream of the ATG start codon) [36] were used. A chimeric intron from chicken β-actin and rabbit β-globin genes (CHMin, 1017 bp, the corresponding sequence of chimeric intron in the pCAGGS vector), human β-globin intron (hBGin, 476 bp) [37], and human chorionic gonadotropin intron (hCGin, 352 bp) [38] were used for intron sequences to improve RNA polymerase II recruitment.

AAV9 vector cloning and production

All PRKN AAV9 vectors were designed by the authors and were produced at the University of Massachusetts Medical School Viral Vector Core, Worcester, MA, USA. All expression cassettes consisted of promoter, intron, human wild-type (WT) or codon-optimized PRKN cDNA, and human growth hormone (hGH) poly A (Table 1 and Table 2). AAV9 vectors were produced using standard triple transient transfection methods. In brief, HEK293 cells were co-transfected with three plasmids: the inverted terminal repeat (ITR) plasmid containing the PRKN transgene, a replication and capsid (RepCap) plasmid, and an adenoviral helper gene plasmid. After 72–96 h, the cells were chemically lysed, and the cell pellet and medium were collected. Full AAV particles were enriched using CsCl sedimentation. The AAV vectors were formulated in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) with 0.001% Pluronic F-68 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and were subjected to standard characterization, including digital droplet (dd) Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) for titrating. Purity assessed by 4–12% SDS-acrylamide gel electrophoresis and silver staining (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The full-to-empty particle ratio was quantified from the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images using ImageJ.

Table 1.

AAV9-PRKN vectors used in the study.

Vector name Promoter (base pairs) Intron (base pairs) cDNA (base pairs) Poly A (base pairs)
AAV9-PK031 CBh (822) None hPRKNd (1398) hGHe (477)
AAV9-PK022 EF1α (1187) None hPRKNd (1398) hGHe (477)
AAV9-PK030 EFS (232) CHIMina (1017) hPRKNd (1398) hGHe (477)
AAV9-PK012 PGK1 (511) CHIMina (1017) hPRKNd (1398) hGHe (477)
AAV9-PK013 SYN1 (469) CHIMina (1017) hPRKNd (1398) hGHe (477)
AAV9-PK023 mCaMKIIα (1289) hBGinb (476) hPRKNd (1398) hGHe (477)
AAV9-PK025 TH (521) CHIMina (1017) hPRKNd (1398) hGHe (477)
AAV9-PK026 PRKN (339) hCGinc (352) hPRKNd (1398) hGHe (477)

Cassette elements flanked by the 5’ ITR and 3’ITR are indicated. The numbers in parenthesis indicate the size in base pairs.

aCHMin Chimeric intron from chicken β-actin and rabbit β-globin genes.

bhBGin Human β-globin intron.

chCGin Human chorionic gonadotropin intron.

dhPRKN Human WT PRKN cDNA.

ehGH Human growth hormone poly A.

Table 2.

AAV9-codon-optimized (co) PRKN vectors.

Vector name Promoter (base pairs) Intron (base pairs) cDNA (base pairs) Poly A (base pairs) CpG # in PRKN cDNA CpG# in ITR to ITR
AAV9-PK013 SYN1 (469) CHIMina (1017) hPRKNb (1398) hGHd (477) 46 293
AAV9-PK041 SYN1 (469) CHIMina (1017) coPRKNc, CpG5-2 (1398) hGHd (477) 5 253
AAV9-PK042 SYN1 (469) CHIMina (1017) coPRKNc, CpG5-4 (1398) hGHd (477) 5 252
AAV9-PK043 SYN1 (469) CHIMina (1017) coPRKNc, CpG0-3 (1398) hGHd (477) 0 248

aCHMin Chimeric intron from chicken β-actin and rabbit β-globin genes.

bhPRKN Human WT PRKN cDNA.

ccoPRKN Human codon-optimized PRKN cDNA.

dhGH Human growth hormone polyA.

Design of codon optimization of PRKN cDNA

Ten codon-optimized PRKN (coPRKN) sequences were generated by the GeneGPS® platform at ATUM (Newark, CA, USA) using a human-specific central nervous system (CNS) codon usage table and codon adaptation index optimized for neurons, with additional annotations and de-risking parameters, including reduction of CpG motifs in WT PRKN coding sequence (from 46 CpG dimers in WT to 5 or 0), restriction enzyme sites were avoided for cloning purpose, removal of potential/cryptic splice sites, removal of cryptic start sites, and removal of nucleotide repeats motifs were included.

Generation of PRKN-null iPSCs

The control 201B7 human iPSC line was a gift from the Center for iPS Cell Research and Application (CiRA), Kyoto, Japan [39]. PRKN homozygous knockout human iPSCs on the 201B7 genetic background were generated by deleting the translation start ATG and inserting stop codons using gene editing tools. Deletion of the ATG codon was confirmed by DNA sequencing and Parkin protein expression by Western blot analysis, with no hParkin expression being detectable (Fig. S1A, B).

iPSC-DA neuronal culture and AAV transduction

Control 201B7 human iPSCs (WT) or isogenic PRKN-null human iPSCs were differentiated into DA neurons based on previously published methods (Fig. S1C) [40, 41]. Briefly, frozen stock WT iPSC or isogenic PRKN-null iPSC-derived midbrain floor plate progenitor cells were cultured for 6 days in ultra-low attachment dishes using the Floor Plate Cell Expansion Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with penicillin/streptomycin (FUJIFILM Wako Chemicals Corporation, Osaka, Japan) in the presence (day 0–1) or absence of 10 μM Y-27632 (day 1–6) while changing the medium once every 2–3 days. Proliferated progenitors were dissociated by Accutase (Innovative Cell Technologies, San Diego, CA, USA), and dissociated cells were seeded in Matrigel-coated 96 well plate (CellCarrier-96 ultra, Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) at 20,000 cells/well with total 200 μL medium of Floor Plate Cell Expansion Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with 1× penicillin/streptomycin and 10 μM Y-27632 (FUJIFILM Wako Chemicals) for 1 day. The next day, half of culture medium was replaced with fresh differentiation medium (Neurobasal medium [Thermo Fisher Scientific] with 1× GlutaMax [Thermo Fisher Scientific], 1× B27 supplement [Thermo Fisher Scientific], 1× CulturOne supplement [Thermo Fisher Scientific], 100 μM ascorbic acid [Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA], 0.5 mM dbc AMP [Sigma-Aldrich], 3 μM PD0325901 [FUJIFILM Wako Chemicals], 20 ng/mL Activin A [R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA], and 1× penicillin/streptomycin) while replacing half the medium twice a week. Eight days after seeding of single midbrain floor plate progenitor cells, differentiated DA neurons were transduced with AAV. Briefly, 100 μL of culture medium was removed, 100 μL of fresh differentiation medium including AAV were added at 0.03, 0.1, 0.3, and 1 × 105 multiplicity of infection (MOI). Half volume of the culture medium was replaced with fresh differentiation medium twice a week and AAV-transduced iPSC-DA neurons were cultured for additional 13 days.

Parkin protein enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

The hParkin protein levels were measured by human Parkin ELISA kit (Abcam, Cambridge, UK, ab212159) according to manufacturer’s instruction. DA neurons were lysed with 80 μL of cell extraction buffer PTR at 4 °C for 30 min. Lysates were transferred into 1.5 mL microtubes and were centrifuged at 18,000 g for 20 min at 4 °C. The supernatants of lysates were used in the Parkin ELISA. As a reference of Parkin levels in human brain, whole brain lysate from one human (Novus Biologicals, Centennial, CO, NB820-59177) was applied for the ELISA (Table S1 and Fig. S2).

Mitophagy induction

Carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenyl hydrazone (CCCP) (Sigma-Aldrich) was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and was used to induce mitophagy in iPSC-DA neurons [42]. Briefly, at 13 days after AAV transduction, half of culture medium was removed and then equal volume of fresh differentiation medium including 1× B27 minus antioxidants (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and CCCP at 20 μM was added. As negative control, neurons were treated with DMSO without AAV transduction. WT DA neurons derived from 201B7 iPSCs were treated with 20 μM CCCP or DMSO as positive control. Twenty-four (24) h after mitophagy induction, culture medium was completely removed, and DA neurons were fixed using 200 μL of cold 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 30 min.

High-content analysis

Chain formation of phosphorylated ubiquitin (poly-pUb) as a readout for Parkin activity and mitochondrial protein TOM20 as a marker for clearance of mitochondria were quantified by immunocytochemistry (ICC). After permeabilization with 0.2% Triton X-100, 4% PFA-fixed DA neurons were blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin (Meso Scale Diagnostics, Rockville, MD, USA, R93BA-1) in PBS buffer with 0.05% Tween 20 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 60 min at room temperature. The cells were incubated with anti-phospho-Ubiquitin (Ser65) antibody (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany, ABS1513-I, 1:500), anti-TOM20 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA, sc-17764, 1:1000), and anti-MAP2 (Merck, AB5543, 1:1000) overnight at 4 °C. Then, the co-immunostained cells were incubated with Alexa Fluor dye-conjugated secondary antibodies (Thermo Fisher Scientific, A21206, A21203, A21103, 1:400) in combination with Hoechst 33342 (Abcam, 1:5000) to stain nuclei for 2 h at room temperature. Fluorescence of 16 fields (fixed spacing fields) per well was imaged with the IN Cell analyzer 6500HS (Cytiva, Marlborough, MA, USA) and was quantified with IN Cell investigator (Cytiva) using a 40 × objective lens. The number of nuclei was quantified by counting the cell nuclei labeled by Hoechst 33342. The area with positive fluorescence signal (μm2) in 16 fields was expressed as an arbitrary unit for poly-pUb and TOM20 analysis. All pseudocolor images were generated by NIS-Elements (Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).

Generation of Prkn knockout (KO) mice

Prkn homozygous KO mice were generated on the C57BL/6 J (CLEA, Fujinomiya, Japan) background by deleting the exon 2 of murine Prkn gene by CRISPR/Cas9 system in the zygote at the Axcelead Drug Discovery Partners (Fujisawa, Japan). Briefly, Cas9, 4 guide RNAs, and single-stranded oligodeoxynucleotide (ssODN) were injected into the zygote to generate F1 heterozygous Prkn KO mice (Fig. S2A, Table S2). Deletion of the exon 2 in F1 mice were confirmed by PCR (forward primer, 5′- CCATTAAGGGTTTGGAGTAATATTCTTTCTT-3’; reverse primer, 5′- AAGATGGACTTTTGCTGTGTGAATTTGAT-3’) (Fig. S2B). Homozygous Prkn KO mice were produced by in vitro fertilization using fresh sperm and oocytes isolated from heterozygous or homozygous Prkn KO mice, followed by a measurement of dosage of exon 2 in Prkn gene by quantitative PCR (forward primer, 5’-TTTGCCGGGAAGGAGCTT-3’; TaqMan probe, 5’-FAM-CGAATCACCTGACGGTT-NFQ-MGB-3’; reverse primer, 5’-CATTAGCTGCAGGGTCTTTGG-3’). The dosage of exon 2 was normalized by a dosage of nerve growth factor (Ngf) gene (forward primer, 5’- TGCATAGCGTAATGTCCATGTTG-3’; TaqMan probe, 5’-VIC- ACGGTTCTGCCTGTACGCCGATCA-NFQ-TAMRA-3’; reverse primer, 5’- TCTCCTTCTGGGACATTGCTATC-3’). No Parkin protein was detectable in the brain of Prkn KO mice by Western blot analysis (Fig. S2C). Prkn KO mice are viable and healthy and show no gross behavior phenotype even at 125 weeks of age, and only a slight reduction of dopamine levels in the striatum compared to that in WT mice at 125 weeks of age (Fig. S2D, E). All mice were housed under laboratory conditions (12 h light/dark cycles) with food (CE-2, CLEA Japan) and water available ad libitum at the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC)- accredited animal facility in Shonan Health Innovation Park (Fujisawa, Japan). The care and use of the animals and the experimental protocols conducted in Takeda were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Shonan Health Innovation Park.

Characterization of aged Prkn KO mice

Rotarod test was performed on a rotarod treadmill (Muromachi Kikai, Tokyo, Japan, MK-670). Nine male 125-week-old Prkn KO mice and fifteen WT mice were placed on a rotating rod (3 cm diameter), and rotation was accelerated from 3 to 40 rpm over 300 s. Fall latency was recorded three time with more than 30 min interval, and the first fall latency of the third trial was used for analysis. After the rotarod test, striatum of mice was removed, and quickly frozen for stock. Striatal dopamine levels were measured by LC/MS/MS at the Axcelead Drug Discovery Partners (Fujisawa, Japan). Briefly, frozen samples were homogenized with 99 volumes of extraction buffer (acetonitrile/ 500 μg/mL ascorbic acid/ 500 μg/mL EDTA, mixture of equal volume) and zirconia beads. Samples that were spiked with internal standards, centrifuged at 22,500 × g for 5 min at 4 °C and the supernatant was collected and dried. After resuspension in 1 M bicarbonate buffer and 4 mg/ mL dansyl chloride by vortex mixing, followed by sonication, the resuspension was incubated for 15 min at 60 °C, and then treated with 15% formic acid. The mixture was centrifuged at 22,500 × g for 5 min at 4 °C, the supernatant was subjected to analysis by LC/MS/MS.

Intra-SN AAV9 administration

AAV9 vectors were administered to the SN of Prkn KO mice. Mice were randomly allocated to each group. Four-month-old or six-month-old male Prkn KO mice were anesthetized with the mixture of 3 anesthetic agents (medetomidine 0.3 mg/kg, midazolam 4 mg/kg, and butorphanol tartrate 5 mg/kg). Anesthetized mice were placed in a stereotaxic frame (Kopf Instruments). In case of the 6-OHDA lesion model four-month-old mice were injected with five (5) μL to allow a broader distribution towards the MFB, the injection site of the 6-OHDA. In case of untreated or αSyn PFF model 2 μL of AAV was injected, with the αSyn PFF being injected into the striatum. The same dose of 1 × 108 vector genome (VG) was delivered at 0.5 μL/min unilaterally into the left SN (AnteroPosterior (AP) = −2.8 mm, MedioLateral (ML) = 1.3 mm from the bregma, DorsoVentral (DV) = −4.4 mm from the dura surface) [22] using a 28-gauge cannula (Eicom, Kyoto, Japan, SMI-3T) with an infusion pump (KD scientific, Tokyo, Japan), and the cannula was removed 5 min after the end of the administration. This study was not blinded.

Tissue Collection

For hParkin protein expression analysis, mouse brains were dissected three weeks after AAV injection and washed with chilled saline. The brains were sliced using a brain matrix, and the midbrain including SN was separated from other regions of the brain slice.

Quantification of hParkin protein levels and VG in the midbrain of AAV9-PRKN injected Prkn KO mice

The midbrain was homogenized in Radio-Immunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer with protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Roche) using a bead beating tissue homogenizer (Bertin Technologies, Tokyo, Japan). Lysates were centrifuged at 20,000 rpm for 20 min at 4 °C. The hParkin protein levels in the supernatant were measured by human Parkin ELISA (Abcam, ab212159) after diluting the supernatant with Cell extraction buffer PTR according to manufacturer’s instruction. In supernatants from WT mouse brains, we could not detect hParkin, indicating that the human Parkin ELISA does not cross-react with the mouse Parkin protein (Fig. S3).

DNA was extracted from tissue RIPA homogenate utilizing the KingFisher™ Flex system (MagMAX™ DNA Multi-Sample Ultra 2.0 Kit, adapted for RNase treatment, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Quantitative PCR assays were conducted using QuantStudio7 Flex Real-Time PCR system (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The specific primer/probe set used for detecting the AAV expression cassette specific sequence for VG was designed as follows: forward primer, 5′-CCCCGTGTGAACGATTGGT-3’; reverse primer, 5′-CGTATTTCCCGTTTAGGCTTTCG-3’; and TaqMan probe, 5′-FAM-AACCCGGTGTCCTGTGAG-NFQ and MGB-3’. The PCR protocol was 40 cycles (95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 1 min) following initial incubations at 50 °C for 2 min and 95 °C for 10 min, conducted in a 20 μL volume containing 2× TaqPath ProAmp Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific), primers (150 nmol/L), probe (250 nmol/L), and DNase-free and RNase-free water. All reactions were carried out in triplicate for each sample.

Western blot analysis

The supernatant of cell extraction buffer PTR lysate or midbrain RIPA lysate was mixed with LDS sample buffer and sample reducing buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and denatured at 70 °C for 10 min. Equal volume of protein samples was separated by 4–12% NuPAGE Bis-Tris gel and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes by iBlot (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Blots were blocked with Starting Block blocking buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 60 min at room temperature. The blots were incubated with anti-Parkin antibody (Thermo Fisher Scientific 702785, 1:200 or BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA, 865602, 1:200) and anti-β actin antibody (Sigma Aldrich, A5441, 1:10000) overnight at 4 °C. The membranes were washed three times with TBST buffer (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan) for 10 min, then incubated with secondary antibody (CST, 1:2000). All antibodies were diluted with solutions of Can Get Signal (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan). Protein bands on the membrane were detected using ECL Prime Western Blotting Detection Reagent and an ImageQuant LAS 4000 imager (Cytiva).

6-OHDA injection into medial forebrain bundle (MFB)

A 6-OHDA hydrochloride (Sigma-Aldrich, H4381, lot # MKNL2977) was dissolved with 0.01% (W/V) ascorbic acid in saline to 0.25 μg (calculated as free base of 6-OHDA)/0.8 μL immediately prior to injection. The dose of 6-OHDA was determined in a dose-finding study to mimic the early phase of PD, resulting in approximately 30% loss of DA neurons (Fig. S4). The 6-OHDA solution was kept on ice and protected from light to minimize oxidation. Three weeks after AAV injection into the SN of Prkn KO mice (4-month old), 0.8 μL of 0.25 μg 6-OHDA was delivered at 0.2 μL/min unilaterally into the left MFB (AP = −1.2 mm, ML = 1.2 mm from the bregma, DV = −4.75 mm from dura surface) through a 28-gauge cannula (Eicom, SMI-3T) using an infusion pump (KD scientific) (n = 8/group), and the cannula was removed 5 min after end of the injection. 0.01% (W/V) ascorbic acid in saline was administered for the control group (n = 6).

α-Syn PFFs injection

Mouse α-Syn PFFs (2 mg/mL in PBS, lot. 2018.11.21) were provided by Dr. Hasegawa, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science[28, 43, 44]. α-Syn PFFs were sonicated with an ultrasonic homogenizer (Misonex, XL2020) for 5 s at 10-s intervals four times prior to the injection. Three weeks following AAV injection into the SN of Prkn KO mice (6-months old), 5 μL of 10 μg α-Syn PFFs were unilaterally injected into the left striatum at 0.25 μL/min (AP = 0.2 mm, ML = 2.0 mm from the bregma, DV = −2.6 mm from dura surface) via a 28-gauge cannula (Eicom, SMI-3T) with an infusion pump (KD scientific) (n = 7–8/group). The cannula was removed 10 min after end of the injection. PBS (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 10010023) was administered in the control group (n = 7).

Immunohistochemistry (IHC)

Tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) staining

Two weeks after the 6-OHDA injection, mouse brains were removed, and then midbrain slices including the SN were dissected. Dissected slices were fixed in 4% PFA in PBS for over 24 h and transferred to 30% sucrose in PBS until saturated. In the α-Syn PFFs study, 1 month after α-Syn PFFs injection, mice were anesthetized with a combination of 3 anesthetic agents and transcardially perfused with ice-cold saline. Mouse brains were removed and fixed in 10% formalin neutral buffer solution over 3 days and then transferred to 30% sucrose in PBS until saturated. As in the 6-OHDA study, midbrain slices containing the SN were collected after cryoprotection. All slices were embedded in Tissue-Tek O.C.T. compound (Sakura Finetek, Tokyo, Japan) and stored at −80 °C. Brain slices which include SNpc were sectioned in the coronal plane at 16 μm thickness with 80 μm intervals using a cryostat. Each brain section was mounted onto glass slide, and slides were stored at −80 °C.

For TH staining, endogenous hydrogen peroxidase was quenched with 0.3% H2O2 in methanol. Then, following the blocking, slides were incubated overnight at 4 °C with anti-TH antibody (Abcam, ab137869, 1:1000). The next day, slides were incubated with Histofine simple stain MAX-PO (Nichirei Bioscience, Tokyo, Japan) for 30 min at room temperature. The colorimetric reaction was produced with 3,3’-diaminobenzidine (DAB), and nuclear counterstain was performed with Mayer’s hematoxylin solution (FUJIFILM Wako Chemicals). Slides were dehydrated through a graded ethanol series, cleared in xylene, and coverslipped. Stained slides were scanned using a NanoZoomer (Hamamatsu Photonics, Hamamatsu City, Japan). The number and area of TH-positive cells in the SNpc from representative three sections were automatically detected and quantified using HALO (Indica Labs, Tokyo, Japan). The percentage of neuroprotection was calculated based on the TH-positive cell number by defining 100% in the vehicle control (vehicle) group and 0% in the no AAV plus toxin or PFF group. Representative images were generated by HALO or NDP.view 2 software (Hamamatsu Photonics).

Parkin immunohistochemistry

Antigen retrieval on brain sections was performed at 90 °C for 15 min with pH 6.0 citrate buffer (Agilent Dako, S2369, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Treated sections were incubated with mouse Ig blocking reagent (Vector Laboratories, MKB-2213, Newark, CA, USA) and then blocked with 2.5% normal horse serum. After blocking non-specific signal, anti-Parkin (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA, Prk8, 4211S, 1:200) and anti-tyrosine hydroxylase (Abcam, ab137869, 1:500) antibodies were applied to slides and incubated overnight at 4 °C. Subsequently, slides were incubated with secondary antibodies (Thermo Fisher Scientific, A11001, A11037, 1:500) in combination with Hoechst 33342 (Abcam, 1:2000). Immunostained slides were coverslipped and scanned using a NanoZoomer to obtain the images and representative images were generated by HALO.

Statistical analysis

The data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). In in vitro studies, which were done in triplicate, statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism version 9.2.0 or 10.4.1 (Dotmatics, GraphPad Software, Woburn, MA, USA). In PRKN-null DA neurons, comparisons between the groups were performed using Dunnett’s post-hoc test after one-way ANOVA test. The effect of the AAV treatment in the presence of CCCP was analyzed using Dunnett’s test compared with a control group (no AAV and no CCCP). In WT iPSC-DA neurons, the effect of CCCP was analyzed by T-test compared with a control group in WT neurons (no AAV and no CCCP). The effect of the co PRKN on Parkin protein expression in vitro was analyzed using Dunnett’s test compared with a control group (WT PRKN sequence) at each MOI. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

In in vivo studies, statistical analyses were performed using Exsus 10.1.6 (EP Croit). The sample size for in vivo studies was n = 6–8, except for AAV9 transduction study with coPRKN and 6-OHDA dose-finding study with a sample size of n = 4. For phenotype analysis in 125-week-old Prkn KO mice, comparisons between WT (n = 15) and Prkn KO (n = 9) mice were performed using Student’s T-test. P-values less than 0.05 were considered significant.

For in vivo VG analysis, the data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD).

In 6-OHDA study, comparisons between the groups were performed using Dunnett’s test after one-way ANOVA test. The effect of the vector AAV9-PK041 was analyzed using Dunnett’s test compared with vehicle control in 6-OHDA lesioned mice. P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. In the α-Syn PFFs study, the effect of α-Syn PFFs was analyzed by Student’s T-test. P-values below 0.05 were considered significant. The effect of the AAV9-PK041 was analyzed using Williams’ multiple comparison test compared with vehicle control in α-Syn PFF-injected mice. P values less than 0.025 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Parkin expression, polyubiquitin formation, and mitophagy induction after AAV-PRKN transduction of PRKN-null iPSC-DA neurons

We have compared hParkin protein expression in PRKN-null iPSC-DA neurons using AAV9-PRKN vector driven by different promoters (four ubiquitous, three neuronal, and one endogenous PRKN promoter) at MOI of 3 × 103, 1 × 104, 3 × 104, and 1 × 105 (Table 1 and Table S3). In control (buffer-treated) PRKN-null iPSC-DA neurons, hParkin protein levels were below the limit of quantification and in WT iPSC-DA neurons at 526.1 ± 6.3 pg/mg total protein (Fig. S5). In all AAV-PRKN groups, we observed a dose-dependent, exponential increase in hParkin expression levels in PRKN-null iPSC-DA neurons, with no substantial effect on cell viability or total cell number for most MOIs tested (Figs. 1, 2A). The expression cassette PK031 (chicken β-actin hybrid, CBh promoter) showed the strongest expression even at the lowest MOI, always above endogenous WT levels (10-fold above WT at the lowest MOI) and reached the plateau at 3 × 104 and 1 × 105. At this highest MOI, there was a clear reduction in cell number (Fig. 2A). In contrast, in the group treated with the expression cassette PK026, using an endogenous PRKN promoter, only very low levels of hParkin protein below the endogenous WT levels were observed, at the 2 highest MOIs (3 × 104 and 1 × 105) with no detectable expression at the two lowest MOIs (3 × 103 and 1 × 104). AAV9 vectors driven by ubiquitous or neuron-specific but not the PRKN endogenous promoter (PK026) achieved hParkin protein expression levels in PRKN-null neurons which exceeded endogenous hParkin levels of WT iPSC-DA neurons using MOIs above 3 × 104. These results show that seven AAV9 vectors can fully restore hParkin expression in PRKN-null iPSC-DA neurons at the MOI 3 × 104 to the equivalent or higher expression level of WT iPSC-DA neurons. The promoter rank order for hParkin protein expression levels is the following: CBh > PGK1 = TH > EFS > EF1α = SYN1 > mCaMKIIα » PRKN promoter.

Fig. 1. AAV9 transduction of human PRKN-null iPSC-DA neurons restores hParkin protein expression.

Fig. 1

PRKN-null DA neurons were analyzed 13 days after transduction with eight different AAV9 vectors encoding hPRKN under the control of either ubiquitous, neuron-specific, or PRKN promoter at four different doses (3 × 103, 1 × 104, 3 × 104, and 1 × 105 MOI). Promoter types are color-coded: black for ubiquitous promoters, red for neuronal, and blue for the endogenous PRKN promoter. Data represent hParkin protein levels (pg/mg of total protein) isolated from AAV9-PRKN transduced PRKN-null DA neurons (n = 3, independent replicates; mean ± SEM). Endogenous Parkin protein levels in WT DA neurons (526.1 ± 6.3 pg/mg total protein) are shown as a dotted line. The x-axis indicates the AAV MOI administered to cells.

Fig. 2. AAV9 transduction of human PRKN-null iPSC-DA neurons restores Parkin function.

Fig. 2

PRKN-null iPSC-DA neurons (PRKN KO) were transduced with eight different AAV9 vectors encoding hPRKN under the control of either ubiquitous, neuron-specific, or PRKN promoter at four different doses (3 × 103, 1 × 104, 3 × 104, and 1 × 105 AAV MOI), and after 13 days treated with 20 μM CCCP for 24 h (+) or untreated (−). WT iPSC DA neurons (WT) were used as positive control cells and treated with 20 μM CCCP for 24 h (+) or untreated (−). The quantifications were done using the IN Cell Investigator software by Cytiva. A Quantification of nuclei number of all cells in the counting fields (n = 3 independent replicates; mean ± SEM). *p < 0.05 or **p < 0.01 versus the untreated in PRKN-null control (0, no AAV transduction; -,no CCCP treatment). ##p < 0.01 versus the untreated in WT control (no AAV and no CCCP). The y-axis shows the nuclei number of 16 fields, and the x-axis shows the AAV MOI and treatment groups, (−) indicates untreated controls. B Quantification of poly-pUb-positive area in neurons (n = 3 independent replicates; mean ± SEM). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, or ***p < 0.001 versus the untreated PRKN-null control (no AAV and no CCCP). #p < 0.05 or ##p < 0.01 versus the untreated in WT control (no AAV and no CCCP). C Quantification of mitochondrial TOM20-positive area within MAP2-positive neuronal regions (n = 3 independent replicates; mean ± SEM). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, or ***p < 0.001 versus the untreated PRKN-null control (no AAV and no CCCP). #p < 0.05 or ##p < 0.01 versus the untreated in WT control (no AAV and no CCCP).

To validate the functionality of hParkin protein expressed from the AAV-PRKN vectors, we assessed Parkin-mediated poly-pUb by detecting pUb and evaluated the clearance of damaged mitochondria by measuring levels of the mitochondrial outer membrane protein TOM20 in PRKN-null iPSC-DA neurons following CCCP treatment. As expected, CCCP treatment did not induce pUb chain formation in untreated PRKN-null iPSC-DA neurons, consistent with the requirement of Parkin for pUb accumulation [10, 11] (Fig. 2B, S6). All eight AAV9 vectors increased poly-pUb levels in CCCP-treated PRKN-null iPSC-DA neurons in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 2B). The promoter rank order measured by their efficiency on poly-pUb levels is the following: CBh > PGK1 > TH = EFS > EF1α > SYN1 > mCaMKIIα » PRKN. For PK031 (CBh promoter) which showed the highest hParkin protein expression in Fig. 1, poly-pUb levels were above that in CCCP-treated WT neurons at all MOIs and reached a plateau (2-fold of poly-pUb levels in CCCP-treated WT neurons) at the lowest dose. These findings suggest a saturation point for Parkin-mediated poly-pUb accumulation, beyond which further increases in hParkin expression of 10-fold or more do not result in additional poly-pUb induction. PK012 (PGK1), PK025 (TH), and PK030 (EFS) yielded 1- to 2-fold hParkin protein expression over endogenous levels at the MOI 3 × 103 (Fig. 1), and poly-pUb levels above of CCCP-treated WT levels at the same MOI, indicating that 1 to 2-fold hParkin protein expression over endogenous levels is sufficient to induce poly-pUb accumulation at levels of WT cells. In the case of PK026 (PRKN promoter), only a marginal increase in poly-pUb was detectable at the highest MOI, and still about 50% below the WT level, consistent with the very low hParkin protein expression (Fig. 1). As a second parameter for Parkin function, we induced mitophagy using CCCP in iPSC-DA neurons from WT and PRKN-null iPSCs and assessed mitophagy activation by immunostaining for TOM20. However, we observed considerable variability in the results of the TOM20 assay, particularly across different experimental runs. In summary, PRKN-null iPSC-DA neurons have a higher TOM20 signal, and do not respond to CCCP treatment except in the case of the PK031 (Fig. 2C). High AAV9 doses for all vectors tested could restore TOM20 levels to WT levels, indicating functional mitophagy. These data support that the Parkin delivered by AAV is functional for all AAV vectors and mitigates mitophagy deficits in PRKN-null iPSC-DA neurons (Fig. 2C). Integrated in vitro analyses of hParkin expression, poly-pUb formation, TOM20 reduction (mitophagy), and cell viability collectively, nominate several promoter constructs for further exploration: the ubiquitous promoters PGK1 and EFS, along with the neuron-specific promoters SYN1 and TH.

Parkin expression by AAV9-codon-optimized (co) PRKN in PRKN-null iPSC-DA neurons and Prkn knockout mice

Codon optimization, especially the removal of immunostimulatory sequences, such as CpG motifs, confers a clear advantage in the context of gene therapy by reducing innate immune activation [45]. Codon optimization of the PRKN cDNA sequence was performed to minimize CpG dinucleotide content while preserving adequate expression of Parkin protein. The WT PRKN cDNA contains 46 CpGs and we were able to reduce the CpGs to five (CpG5-2, CpG5-4) or zero (CpG0-3) applying a codon optimization algorithm optimized for neuronal expression (Table 2 and Table S4). Three codon-optimized sequences were cloned into a cassette driven by the neuron-specific human SYN1 promoter and packaged into AAV9 for in vitro and in vivo analyses. The SYN1 promoter was selected as it achieves moderate hParkin protein expression (Fig. 1) and allows to test the effect of Parkin expression specifically in neurons.

PRKN-null human iPSC-DA neurons were transduced with AAV9-CpG5-2 (PK041), CpG5-4 (PK042), or CpG0-3 (PK043) at MOIs of 3 × 103, 1 × 104, 3 × 104, and 1 × 105. All three vectors induced MOI-dependent hParkin protein expression, with expression above WT vectors (not codon optimized) at all MOIs (Fig. 3A). Significantly higher hParkin protein expression was observed in all coPRKN vector groups compared to WT vector group in human iPSC-DA neurons at the highest MOI of 1 × 105 (1.6 folds for CpG5-2 and CpG5-4, and 2.4 folds for CpG0-3).

Fig. 3. AAV9 transduction with codon-optimized PRKN sequences results in increased hParkin protein expression in human PRKN-null iPSC-DA neurons and Prkn KO mice.

Fig. 3

A PRKN-null iPSC-DA neurons were analyzed 13 days after transduction with AAV9-coPRKN vectors (PK041, PK042, and PK043) and parental WT PRKN AAV9 vector (PK013) at four different doses (3 × 103, 1 × 104, 3 × 104, and 1 × 105 AAV MOI). hParkin protein levels were quantified in AAV-transduced PRKN-null iPSC-DA neurons (n = 3 independent replicates; mean ± SEM). ***p < 0.001 versus PK013 (WT PRKN) at each MOI. B, C AAV9-coPRKN vectors (PK041, PK042, and PK043) and parental WT PRKN vector (PK013) were unilaterally injected into the SN of Prkn KO mice at 1 × 108 VG per brain. B The graph shows VG copy number per μg genomic DNA in the midbrain for each treatment group as indicated on the x-axis (mean ± SD). C The graph shows hParkin protein levels in the midbrain, quantified by ELISA, for each treatment group as indicated on the x-axis (mean ± SEM). *p < 0.05 or **p < 0.01, versus PK013 (WT PRKN).

Next, we evaluated the impact of codon-optimized PRKN (coPRKN) on hParkin protein expression in vivo by administrating 1 × 108 VG of each AAV9 vector containing coPRKN (PK041, PK042, or PK043) into the SN of Prkn knockout (KO) mice. AAV9 transduction efficiency was assessed in mice by quantifying by VG copies in the midbrain three weeks post AAV administration. In the PK041 (CpG5-2) treated group, VGs were significantly higher (2.6-fold) than that of WT sequence (PK013), whereas VGs in PK042 (CpG5-4) and PK043 (CpG0-3) treated groups were only slightly higher (Fig. 3B). All three AAV vectors achieved hParkin protein expression in the midbrain of Prkn KO mice with PK042 (CpG5-4) and PK043 (CpG0-3) reaching similar levels to WT, and only PK041 (CpG5-2) showing increased expression (Fig. 3C). Parkin protein expression in the midbrain and striatum after intra-SN injection of each AAV vector was also confirmed by Western blot in an independent study by administrating 1 × 107 VG of each AAV9 vector (Fig. S7). We have selected PK041 (CpG5-2) with the highest hParkin expression (1.7 folds over WT) and highest transduction efficiency (VG) for further evaluation in mouse PD models.

Neuroprotection of DA neurons by AAV9-PK041 (SYN1-coPRKN CpG5-2) in PD mouse models

We have evaluated AAV9-PK041 vector encoding coPRKN CpG5-2 driven by the SYN1 promoter in two PD mouse models, the 6-OHDA lesion model and α-Syn PFFs-lesion model on the Prkn KO background. In the 6-OHDA PD mouse model, oxidative stress-mediated apoptotic cell death is a key driver of subsequent DA neuronal degeneration, consistent with observations in PRKN-PD patients [46, 47]. Additionally, 6-OHDA induces mitophagy deficits in neurons in vivo [48]. In our study, 6-OHDA was injected three weeks after intra-SN AAV injection and brains were analyzed two weeks after 6-OHDA lesioning. In the ipsilateral (Ipsi) side, we could detect a significant (p = 0.003) protection of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH)-positive neurons, the DA neurons in the SNpc, after AAV9-PK041 injection compared to vehicle control with 6-OHDA stimuli (Table 3, Fig. 4A, B). In the contralateral (Contra) side, the TH-positive neurons were not protected by AAV9-PK041, are similar to the vehicle control and serve as intra-animal control, indicating that the AAV does not spread to the contralateral side. The ratio of TH-positive neurons on the ipsilateral side to the contralateral side is significantly (63%, p = 0.023) increased in the AAV9-PK041-treated group compared to the 6-OHDA-lesioned vehicle group. In the AAV9-PK041 treatment group, hParkin is restored in the SN of ipsilateral side and colocalizes with TH, with almost all TH-positive cells in the SN at the injection site expressing hParkin (Fig. 4C, D). These results indicate that expression of Parkin exerts a neuroprotective effect, and that targeted delivery via AAV vectors under the control of the neuron-specific SYN1 promoter is an effective strategy for achieving cell-type restricted expression in vivo.

Table 3.

Number of TH-positive DA neurons in the 6-OHDA-lesioned model.

Group Ipsilateral TH-positive DA neurons (Cells, mean ± SEM) Contralateral TH-positive DA neurons (Cells, mean ± SEM) Ratio of Ipsi-/Contra-lateral (Ratio, mean ± SEM)
Vehicle + 0.01% ascorbic acid 451.3 ± 26.6 663.8 ± 51.2 0.692 ± 0.043
Vehicle + 6-OHDA 282.3 ± 29.9 726.3 ± 37.1 0.400 ± 0.050
AAV9-PK041 (CpG5-2) + 6-OHDA 507.4 ± 61.1 866.3 ± 61.6 0.584 ± 0.050

Fig. 4. Local delivery of AAV9-PK041 (SYN1-coPRKN CpG5-2) results in DA neuronal protection in the SNpc of 6-OHDA-lesioned Prkn KO mice.

Fig. 4

AAV9-PK041 (SYN1-coPRKN CpG5-2) was unilaterally injected into the SN of Prkn KO mice at a dose of 1 × 108 VG per brain, followed by 6-OHDA lesion in the MFB of the same side (AAV injection side) (n = 8 / group). A Representative immunohistochemical TH staining in the ipsilateral SN. TH-positive neurons in the SNpc detected by HALO software are shown in red. B Quantification of TH-positive DA neurons in the SNpc on the ipsilateral (Ipsi) or contralateral (Contra) sides of AAV injection. Open bars indicate vehicle-treated controls, gray bars represent 6-OHDA treated groups. The ratio of TH-positive DA neurons between ipsilateral and contralateral sides is presented in the graph labeled Ipsi/Contra. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05 or **p < 0.01, compared with vehicle control with 6-OHDA. C, D) hParkin protein distribution in the SN was detected by IHC analysis. C Representative image showing hParkin expression (green), TH expression (red), and nuclei (blue) in the midbrain of AAV9-PK041-injected Prkn KO mouse. The image is taken from the anterior side; the right hemisphere corresponds to the AAV and 6-OHDA injection site showing clearly hParkin expression (yellow and green signals). D Images of the SNpc region illustrating hParkin expression in TH-positive neurons of the 6-OHDA-lesioned side (yellow signals), showing images for hParkin-positive cells, TH-positive cells, and nuclei, as well as the merged image.

As a second model, we used the α-Syn PFF injection mouse model, which is relevant for studying the progressive pathology of sporadic PD as the injected PFFs seed the misfolding and aggregation of endogenous α-Syn, resulting in the formation of Lewy body-like inclusions that progressively spread throughout anatomically connected brain regions. This model recapitulates key pathological features of human disease, including phosphorylated α-Syn (pS129) accumulation, neuroinflammation, and dopaminergic neuronal loss. We evaluated the effect of Parkin protein on neuroprotection in the context of α-Syn propagation [49]. About 35% DA neuronal loss in the SNpc was detectable one month after α-Syn PFFs injection (Table 4, Fig. 5A, B), consistent with previously published data [50]. Pretreatment with AAV9-PK041 prior to α-Syn PFFs injection resulted in a dose-dependent preservation of TH-positive neuronal cell bodies in the SNpc, with the highest dose (1 × 10⁸ VG) restoring TH-positive cell counts to levels comparable to those in the non–PFF injected control group (Fig. 5A, B, p = 0.038 in 0.3 × 108 VG group; p = 0.006 in 1 × 108 VG group). The findings from both, the 6-OHDA and α-Syn PFFs-lesion models illustrate the neuroprotective effects of hParkin protein. As α-Syn-induced DA neuron loss is a hallmark of idiopathic PD [49], Parkin supplementation with its neuroprotective activity shows potential for the treatment of idiopathic PD in addition to PRKN-PD.

Table 4.

Quantification of TH-positive DA neurons in the α-Syn PFF-lesioned model.

Group Number of TH + DA neurons (mean ± SEM) Area of TH + DA neurons (μm2, mean ± SEM)
Vehicle + PBS 551.1 ± 53.1 424,778.0 ± 40,848.7
Vehicle + α-Syn PFFs 360.4 ± 69.2 308,223.3 ± 46,836.9
0.3 × 108 VG AAV9-PK041 (CpG5-2) + α-Syn PFFs 490.8 ± 42.3 377,981.8 ± 22,056.0
1.0 × 108 VG AAV9-PK041 (CpG5-2) + α-Syn PFFs 564.9 ± 31.1 427,741.5 ± 24,327.8

Fig. 5. Local delivery of AAV9-PK041 (SYN1-coPRKN CpG5-2) results in DA neuronal protection in the SNpc of Prkn KO mice in the α-Syn PFFs model.

Fig. 5

AAV9-PK041 was unilaterally injected into the SN of Prkn KO mice at either 0.3 × 108 or 1 × 108 VG per brain, followed by striatal α-Syn PFF injection at the same site (n = 8 or 7, respectively). A Representative images of TH immunohistochemistry staining showing DA neuronal cell bodies and axon fibers (brown signals) in the ipsilateral SN at 1 month after α-Syn PFFs injection. B Quantification of TH-positive DA neurons and total TH-positive area in the ipsilateral SNpc. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. #p < 0.05; compared with vehicle control without α-Syn PFF injection, *p < 0.025; vs. vehicle control following α-Syn PFF injection.

Discussion

We have developed a series of AAV9-PRKN vectors capable of delivering functional Parkin both in vitro and in vivo. In human iPSC-DA neurons subjected to mitophagy-inducing conditions, all tested AAV9 vectors effectively reduced mitophagy deficits in PRKN-null iPSC-DA neurons. In the Prkn KO mouse model, AAV9-PK041 (human coPRKN CpG5-2 with the SYN1 promoter) achieved robust hParkin expression in the midbrain. Furthermore, in two rodent PD disease models, AAV9-coPRKN administration completely prevented DA neuronal loss in the SNpc.

Prior research has shown that Parkin overexpression protects nigral DA neurons in multiple PD animal models, either induced by neurotoxins (6-OHDA and 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)) or by α-Syn overexpression. Similar neuroprotective effects of Parkin have been observed independent of the delivery method, AAV, lentiviral vectors, transgenic mice, or recombinant protein [22–26, 51]. The extend of the neuroprotective effect, however, varies between the studies, from partial to complete DA neuronal protection. The role of Parkin in mitophagy has been established more recently and therefore was not analyzed in the earlier studies [12, 13].

In this study, we have systematically evaluated eight promoters for their ability to drive hParkin expression, induce poly-pUb accumulation, and rescue mitophagy in iPSC-DA neurons. Promoter selection was guided by four criteria: 1) achieving dose-dependent hParkin expression levels above endogenous levels, 2) attaining dose-dependent poly-pUb accumulation, 3) rescuing mitophagy deficits, and 4) demonstrating absence of cytotoxicity at the highest MOI of 1 × 105. Our findings indicate that both ubiquitous (PGK1 and EFS) and neuron-specific (SYN1 and TH) promoters can meet these criteria.

Two promoters failed the criteria for hParkin expression. Especially, the endogenous Parkin promoter was surprisingly weak, and was unable to drive expression to WT Parkin levels, even at the highest AAV dose tested. In contrast, the CBh promoter was the strongest, reaching maximal expression at the second-highest dose, however, this was associated with cytotoxicity at the highest dose.

We analyzed the chain formation of pUb and the subsequent mitophagy in relation to the transduced hParkin expression level. Poly-pUb and mitophagy are increased in a MOI-dependent manner in response to hParkin protein expression. The hParkin protein exponentially increases with MOI, while the subsequent poly-pUb accumulation and mitophagy increases in a non-exponential manner. Interestingly, despite its high expression strength, the CBh promoter, did not induce MOI-dependent poly-pUb accumulation or mitophagy. This indicates that excessive hParkin expression may exceed the capacity of available Parkin substrates on mitochondrial membrane and downstream factors, thereby limiting subsequent signaling. At the highest dose we could observe cytotoxicity, consistent with previous reports in both, in vitro and in vivo models [12, 52]. Figure 2A indicates cytotoxicity for CBh promoter vector (PK031) at the highest MOI 1 × 105 in PRKN-null iPSC-DA neurons, with the hParkin protein expression reaching levels approximately 84-fold higher than those observed in WT (Fig. 1). The observed expression range from 0.4-fold to 20-fold relative to baseline is sufficiently broad to select a promoter suitable for therapeutic development.

Previous in vitro studies have suggested that Parkin plays a role in mitophagy in DA neurons [42, 53]. Mitophagy impairment is thought to be key for the pathogenesis of PRKN-PD resulting from loss of PRKN expression and consequent disruption of Parkin-mediated ubiquitination of mitochondrial outer membrane proteins. Although poly-pUb signals have not been detected in SNpc DA neurons from PRKN-PD postmortem brain tissues, evidence of mitophagy deficits in human PD brain tissues has been reported, based on the detection of poly-pUb or p-S65-Ub as markers of mitophagy [19, 54, 55]. Our PRKN-null iPSC-DA neurons compared to isogenic control iPSC-DA neurons showed clear mitophagy deficits, which can be reversed through treatment with AAV9-PRKN. Surprisingly, even very low levels of hParkin expression (0.4-fold of WT Parkin levels) were sufficient to rescue poly-pUb and mitophagy, as seen for the very weak PRKN promoter (PK026). Our results indicate that as little as 0.4-fold of normal Parkin can induce mitophagy and restore the phenotype. This level of expression is comparable to that observed in heterozygous carriers of mutant PRKN, who typically do not develop PD. To our knowledge, this is the first time to demonstrate in vitro, using DA neurons, that even very low levels of Parkin protein are sufficient to restore function. However, the minimal threshold of Parkin protein required to restore mitophagy remains undefined. Alternative assays, such as the mitophagy indicator assay [48] have been used by others and could provide additional support for our findings. However, since we compared eight different promoters and demonstrated the benefits of Parkin expression in two independent assays, poly-pUb accumulation and TOM20, we did not pursue further assay validation considering the totality of data.

As promising candidates for therapeutic drug development, we have identified two ubiquitous, PGK and EFS, and two neuronal promoters, SYN1 and TH and have selected the neuron-specific promoter SYN1 for further in vivo validation, to better understand the function of hParkin when expression is restricted to neurons. AAV-PRKN was delivered directly to the target site, the SN, the most severely affected region is the SNpc in PRKN-PD [21]. SN injection of AAV-PRKN is effective, and our data show a broad biodistribution of hParkin protein in the TH-positive DA neurons throughout the entire SNpc (Fig. 4C, D). In the 6-OHDA and α-Syn PFF mouse models in the Prkn-null background, we achieve full protection of the DA neurons at a dose of 1 × 108 VG, without seeing any adverse effects or indications of neurotoxicity in the brain analyzed. The lesion models show distinct disease progressions: 6-OHDA induces DA neuronal loss within 3−7 days, whereas α-Syn PFFs require over one month to induce nigral degeneration [50]. Preventive pre-treatment of AAV-PRKN provides the same protection in both models, suggesting that PRKN gene therapy is neuroprotective under these conditions.

The two selected PD models, 6-OHDA- and α-Syn PFFs-lesioned mouse models, recapitulate features of PRKN-PD and idiopathic PD, including DA neuronal loss, mitophagy impairment [48], and increased oxidative stress [56, 57]. We have used both models in the Prkn-null background to assess the efficacy of transgene hPRKN expression. No differences in lesion severity were observed following 6-OHDA- or α-Syn PFF treatment in Prkn KO mice compared with WT controls. In WT mice having normal Parkin protein levels, 6-OHDA or α-Syn PFF treatment also results in PD disease phenotypes including TH neuronal loss [26, 50, 58]. Our results indicate that overexpression of hParkin alone in neuronal cells protects DA neurons in vivo. This supports a neuroprotective role of Parkin. Recent studies identified that Parkin exerts anti-oxidative activities via cysteine residues in the Parkin protein [47]. This suggests that, in addition to mitophagy induction, an increase in the anti-oxidative capacity of AAV-coPRKN treatment may also contribute to the neuroprotective effects. Using a ubiquitous promoter may offer broader protection, as Parkin is expressed not only in neurons but also in microglia and astrocytes. It has been reported to play a role in anti-neuroinflammation through the cGAS-STING pathway and regulation of mitochondrial antigen-presentation and immune responses [59–62]. A ubiquitous promoter may therefore provide broader therapeutic efficacy, when considering Parkin’s roles in glial and non-neuronal cells. In in vivo studies using the neuron-specific SYN1 promoter cassette suggest that neuronal Parkin expression alone is sufficient for neuroprotection, without the need for Parkin expression in astrocytes or microglia, at least in the preventative setting. For clinical translation, a ubiquitous promoter may provide broader benefits as Parkin is normally ubiquitously expressed and should be evaluated in vivo.

The neuroprotective effects of AAV9-coPRKN observed in two PD mouse models suggest that early therapeutic intervention may be most effective, as motor symptoms in sporadic PD patients typically manifest only after approximately 30-50% SNpc DA neurons are lost [63, 64]. Given the slow disease progression of PRKN-PD, which may be correlated with a slow DA neurodegeneration, there may be a broader therapeutic window for gene therapy to protect remaining DA neurons in the SNpc and their projected DA axon terminal fibers in the striatum. A recent study demonstrated that recombinant Parkin protein therapy can restore TH-positive DA neuronal loss and improve motor function, even when administered during the symptomatic phase of PD mouse models [26]. This indicates that PRKN gene therapy may not only protect existing DA neurons but also enhance their function, even if the intervention occurs after the onset of the symptoms. Furthermore, recent reports suggest that TH-positive DA neurons can be regenerated from TH-negative DOPA decarboxylase (DDC)-positive neurons in the SN or neural progenitor cells in PD animal models induced by α-Syn overexpression, 6-OHDA, or MPTP [65, 66]. Thus, Parkin may also play a role in the generation of DA neurons, and PRKN gene therapy could potentially reverse the PD phenotype with a single treatment, even after the disease onset.

The limitations of this study include the relatively short evaluation period, as AAV9-coPRKN treatment was assessed over 5 or 8 weeks in two PD models demonstrating neuronal protection. Longer-term studies are needed to confirm the durability of hParkin expression and the persistence of neuroprotective effects. Furthermore, comprehensive safety assessments, including evaluations of immune responses and potential off-target effects, will be necessary for translation to human. These aspects should be further investigated in rodent models and in non-human primates.

In summary, we have shown that the promoter choice has a significant impact on the expression and function of hParkin underscoring its importance in expression cassette design for gene therapy. Functional evaluation in PRKN-null iPSC-DA neurons demonstrate that the PGK1, EFS, SYN1, and TH promoters drive robust hParkin expression and restore mitophagy without causing neurotoxicity. Furthermore, the selected AAV9-coPRKN vector ameliorates neurodegeneration in both the 6-OHDA-lesion and α-Syn PFF-lesion mouse models. These findings highlight the therapeutic potential of AAV9-coPRKN gene therapy for hereditary PRKN-PD, idiopathic PD, and related neurodegenerative conditions.

Supplementary information

Supplemental Table 1 (77.7KB, docx)
Supplemental Table 2 (77.9KB, docx)
Supplemental Table 3 (83KB, docx)
Supplemental Table 4 (78.4KB, docx)
Supplemental Figure 1 (488.7KB, pdf)
Supplemental Figure 2 (235.1KB, pdf)
Supplemental Figure 3 (49KB, pdf)
Supplemental Figure 4 (351.4KB, pdf)
Supplemental Figure 5 (31.9KB, pdf)
Supplemental Figure 6 (483.8KB, pdf)
Supplemental Figure 7 (134.4KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for receiving mouse α-Syn PFFs from Dr. Masato Hasegawa at Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science. We thank Sou Sakamoto, Miha Kitajima, Shingo Yoshimoto, and Hidehisa Iwata for generation of PRKN-null iPSC, Keiko Tominari, Masayo Saito, Namiko Yamaguchi for DA neuron preparation, Mayumi Nishida for generation of Prkn KO mice, and our coworkers and collaborators, specifically Shunsuke Yamamoto, Taku Sugita, and Takashi Obara for experimental and technical support, and Xin Liu and Hiroyuki Inuzuka for research management. We like to thank Jaewon Lee, Hidenori Kamiguchi, Saku Miyamoto, Jeong Ho Oak, Hironobu Yasuno, and Ceri Davies for scientific discussions and manuscript review. We would like to express our sincere gratitude to Prof. Nobutaka Hattori at Juntendo University for scientific discussions and sharing his insights into Parkin.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: TH, GP, data acquisition and analysis: TH, GP, MaNi, XS, SJ, MiNa, MiNi, KT, P-TL, TO, original draft: TH, GP, resources: GP, MT. All authors read the manuscript critically and approved the content.

Data availability

All data is included in this article or the supplementary material. Sequences are listed in the supplementary material.

Ethical approval

All animal experiments were performed according to the guidelines approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Shonan Health Innovation Park, that operates in full accordance with the Act on Welfare and Management of Animals (Act No. 105 of October 1, 1973) and the Standards relating to the Care and Keeping and Reducing Pain of Laboratory Animals (Notice No. 88 of the Ministry of Environment, 2006) (IACUC approval number: AU-00030499, AU-00030645, and AU-00031173).

Competing interests

All authors are employees of Takeda Pharmaceuticals. The study was funded solely by Takeda Pharmaceuticals.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Takeshi Hioki, Masaaki Nishimura.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41434-026-00599-0.

References

  • 1.Hattori N, Mizuno Y. Twenty years since the discovery of the parkin gene. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2017;124:1037–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Funayama M, Nishioka K, Li Y, Hattori N. Molecular genetics of Parkinson’s disease: Contributions and global trends. J Hum Genet. 2023;68:125–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kitada T, Asakawa S, Hattori N, Matsumine H, Yamamura Y, Minoshima S, et al. Mutations in the parkin gene cause autosomal recessive juvenile Parkinsonism. Nature. 1998;392:605–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lücking CB, Dürr A, Bonifati V, Vaughan J, De Michele G, Gasser T, et al. Association between early-onset Parkinson’s disease and mutations in the parkin gene. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1560–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Grünewald A, Kasten M, Ziegler A, Klein C. Next-generation phenotyping using the parkin example: time to catch up with genetics. JAMA Neurol. 2013;70:1186–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Diogo D, Wong EHM, DeBoever C, Qu W, Lee J, Crawford S, et al. Estimated genetics prevalence of early-onset Parkinson’s disease caused by PRKN gene mutations. medRxiv.
  • 7.Kasten M, Hartmann C, Hampf J, Schaake S, Westenberger A, Vollstedt EJ, et al. Genotype-Phenotype Relations for the Parkinson’s Disease Genes Parkin, PINK1, DJ1: MDSGene Systematic Review. Mov Disord. 2018;33:730–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Khan NL, Graham E, Critchley P, Schrag AE, Wood NW, Lees AJ, et al. Parkin disease: a phenotypic study of a large case series. Brain. 2003;126:1279–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ishikawa A, Tsuji S. Clinical analysis of 17 patients in 12 Japanese families with autosomal-recessive type juvenile parkinsonism. Neurology. 1996;47:160–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Okatsu K, Koyano F, Kimura M, Kosako H, Saeki Y, Tanaka K, et al. Phosphorylated ubiquitin chain is the genuine Parkin receptor. J Cell Biol. 2015;209:111–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Shiba-Fukushima K, Arano T, Matsumoto G, Inoshita T, Yoshida S, Ishihama Y, et al. Phosphorylation of mitochondrial polyubiquitin by PINK1 promotes Parkin mitochondrial tethering. PLoS Genet. 2014;10:e1004861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Narendra D, Tanaka A, Suen DF, Youle RJ. Parkin is recruited selectively to impaired mitochondria and promotes their autophagy. J Cell Biol. 2008;183:795–803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Matsuda N, Sato S, Shiba K, Okatsu K, Saisho K, Gautier CA, et al. PINK1 stabilized by mitochondrial depolarization recruits Parkin to damaged mitochondria and activates latent Parkin for mitophagy. J Cell Biol. 2010;189:211–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Matsuda N. Phospho-ubiquitin: upending the PINK-Parkin-ubiquitin cascade. J Biochem. 2016;159:379–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pereira SL, Grossmann D, Delcambre S, Hermann A, Grünewald A. Novel insights into Parkin-mediated mitochondrial dysfunction and neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s disease. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2023;80:102720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Choong CJ, Mochizuki H. Involvement of Mitochondria in Parkinson’s Disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:17027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 17.Shimura H, Hattori N, Kubo S, Yoshikawa M, Kitada T, Matsumine H, et al. Immunohistochemical and subcellular localization of Parkin protein: absence of protein in autosomal recessive juvenile parkinsonism patients. Ann Neurol. 1999;45:668–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Seike N, Yokoseki A, Takeuchi R, Saito K, Miyahara H, Miyashita A, et al. Genetic Variations and Neuropathologic Features of Patients with PRKN Mutations. Mov Disord. 2021;36:1634–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Shiba-Fukushima K, Ishikawa KI, Inoshita T, Izawa N, Takanashi M, Sato S, et al. Evidence that phosphorylated ubiquitin signaling is involved in the etiology of Parkinson’s disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2017;26:3172–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Seirafi M, Kozlov G, Gehring K. Parkin structure and function. Febs j. 2015;282:2076–88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Doherty KM, Silveira-Moriyama L, Parkkinen L, Healy DG, Farrell M, Mencacci NE, et al. Parkin disease: a clinicopathologic entity? JAMA Neurol. 2013;70:571–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yasuda T, Hayakawa H, Nihira T, Ren YR, Nakata Y, Nagai M, et al. Parkin-mediated protection of dopaminergic neurons in a chronic MPTP-minipump mouse model of Parkinson disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2011;70:686–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yamada M, Mizuno Y, Mochizuki H. Parkin gene therapy for alpha-synucleinopathy: a rat model of Parkinson’s disease. Hum Gene Ther. 2005;16:262–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Paterna JC, Leng A, Weber E, Feldon J, Büeler H. DJ-1 and Parkin modulate dopamine-dependent behavior and inhibit MPTP-induced nigral dopamine neuron loss in mice. Mol Ther. 2007;15:698–704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Vercammen L, Van der Perren A, Vaudano E, Gijsbers R, Debyser Z, Van den Haute C, et al. Parkin protects against neurotoxicity in the 6-hydroxydopamine rat model for Parkinson’s disease. Mol Ther. 2006;14:716–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chung E, Choi Y, Park J, Nah W, Park J, Jung Y, et al. Intracellular delivery of Parkin rescues neurons from accumulation of damaged mitochondria and pathological α-synuclein. Sci Adv. 2020;6:eaba1193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Cui J, Zhao D, Xu M, Li Z, Qian J, Song N, et al. Characterization of graded 6-Hydroxydopamine unilateral lesion in medial forebrain bundle of mice. Sci Rep. 2024;14:3721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Masuda-Suzukake M, Nonaka T, Hosokawa M, Kubo M, Shimozawa A, Akiyama H, et al. Pathological alpha-synuclein propagates through neural networks. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2014;2:88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gray SJ, Foti SB, Schwartz JW, Bachaboina L, Taylor-Blake B, Coleman J, et al. Optimizing promoters for recombinant adeno-associated virus-mediated gene expression in the peripheral and central nervous system using self-complementary vectors. Hum Gene Ther. 2011;22:1143–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zheng C, Baum BJ. All human EF1α promoters are not equal: markedly affect gene expression in constructs from different sources. Int J Med Sci. 2014;11:404–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Schambach A, Bohne J, Chandra S, Will E, Margison GP, Williams DA, et al. Equal potency of gammaretroviral and lentiviral SIN vectors for expression of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase in hematopoietic cells. Mol Ther. 2006;13:391–400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kita-Matsuo H, Barcova M, Prigozhina N, Salomonis N, Wei K, Jacot JG, et al. Lentiviral vectors and protocols for creation of stable hESC lines for fluorescent tracking and drug resistance selection of cardiomyocytes. PLoS One. 2009;4:e5046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Nathanson JL, Yanagawa Y, Obata K, Callaway EM. Preferential labeling of inhibitory and excitatory cortical neurons by endogenous tropism of adeno-associated virus and lentivirus vectors. Neuroscience. 2009;161:441–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Dittgen T, Nimmerjahn A, Komai S, Licznerski P, Waters J, Margrie TW, et al. Lentivirus-based genetic manipulations of cortical neurons and their optical and electrophysiological monitoring in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:18206–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Coker GT 3rd, Vinnedge L, O’Malley KL. Characterization of rat and human tyrosine hydroxylase genes: functional expression of both promoters in neuronal and non-neuronal cell types. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1988;157:1341–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Asakawa S, Tsunematsu K, Takayanagi A, Sasaki T, Shimizu A, Shintani A, et al. The genomic structure and promoter region of the human parkin gene. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001;286:863–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Harding TC, Koprivnikar KE, Tu GH, Zayek N, Lew S, Subramanian A, et al. Intravenous administration of an AAV-2 vector for the expression of factor IX in mice and a dog model of hemophilia B. Gene Ther. 2004;11:204–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sun L, Li J, Xiao X. Overcoming adeno-associated virus vector size limitation through viral DNA heterodimerization. Nat Med. 2000;6:599–602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, Narita M, Ichisaka T, Tomoda K, et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell. 2007;131:861–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Shoji M Method for producing dopaminergic neurons. JP6419073, US10017734.
  • 41.Naito Y, Sakamoto S, Kojima T, Homma M, Tanaka M, Matsui H. Novel beta-glucocerebrosidase chaperone compounds identified from cell-based screening reduce pathologically accumulated glucosylsphingosine in iPS-derived neuronal cells. SLAS Discov. 2023,28:344–9. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 42.Imaizumi Y, Okada Y, Akamatsu W, Koike M, Kuzumaki N, Hayakawa H, et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction associated with increased oxidative stress and α-synuclein accumulation in PARK2 iPSC-derived neurons and postmortem brain tissue. Mol Brain. 2012;5:35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Nonaka T, Watanabe S, Masuda M, Hasegawa M. Cell into which protein, which can serve as polymerization nucleus of protein polymer, or polymer thereof is introduced, and method for production of the cell (JP5665258). In: Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, (ed), 2006.
  • 44.Tarutani A, Suzuki G, Shimozawa A, Nonaka T, Akiyama H, Hisanaga S, et al. The Effect of Fragmented Pathogenic α-Synuclein Seeds on Prion-like Propagation. J Biol Chem. 2016;291:18675–88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Faust SM, Bell P, Cutler BJ, Ashley SN, Zhu Y, Rabinowitz JE, et al. CpG-depleted adeno-associated virus vectors evade immune detection. J Clin Invest. 2013;123:2994–3001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Tieu K. A guide to neurotoxic animal models of Parkinson’s disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2011;1:a009316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Tokarew JM, El-Kodsi DN, Lengacher NA, Fehr TK, Nguyen AP, Shutinoski B, et al. Age-associated insolubility of parkin in human midbrain is linked to redox balance and sequestration of reactive dopamine metabolites. Acta Neuropathol. 2021;141:725–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Katayama H, Hama H, Nagasawa K, Kurokawa H, Sugiyama M, Ando R, et al. Visualizing and Modulating Mitophagy for Therapeutic Studies of Neurodegeneration. Cell. 2020;181:1176–87.e16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Braak H, Del Tredici K, Rüb U, de Vos RA, Jansen Steur EN, Braak E. Staging of brain pathology related to sporadic Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2003;24:197–211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Shimozawa A, Fujita Y, Kondo H, Takimoto Y, Terada M, Sanagi M, et al. Effect of L-DOPA/Benserazide on Propagation of Pathological α-Synuclein. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Bian M, Liu J, Hong X, Yu M, Huang Y, Sheng Z, et al. Overexpression of parkin ameliorates dopaminergic neurodegeneration induced by 1- methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine in mice. PLoS One. 2012;7:e39953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Van Rompuy AS, Lobbestael E, Van der Perren A, Van den Haute C, Baekelandt V. Long-term overexpression of human wild-type and T240R mutant Parkin in rat substantia nigra induces progressive dopaminergic neurodegeneration. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2014;73:159–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Suzuki S, Akamatsu W, Kisa F, Sone T, Ishikawa KI, Kuzumaki N, et al. Efficient induction of dopaminergic neuron differentiation from induced pluripotent stem cells reveals impaired mitophagy in PARK2 neurons. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2017;483:88–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Yi W, MacDougall EJ, Tang MY, Krahn AI, Gan-Or Z, Trempe JF, et al. The landscape of Parkin variants reveals pathogenic mechanisms and therapeutic targets in Parkinson’s disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2019;28:2811–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hou X, Fiesel FC, Truban D, Castanedes Casey M, Lin WL, Soto AI, et al. Age- and disease-dependent increase of the mitophagy marker phospho-ubiquitin in normal aging and Lewy body disease. Autophagy. 2018;14:1404–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Dryanovski DI, Guzman JN, Xie Z, Galteri DJ, Volpicelli-Daley LA, Lee VM, et al. Calcium entry and α-synuclein inclusions elevate dendritic mitochondrial oxidant stress in dopaminergic neurons. J Neurosci. 2013;33:10154–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Tapias V, Hu X, Luk KC, Sanders LH, Lee VM, Greenamyre JT. Synthetic alpha-synuclein fibrils cause mitochondrial impairment and selective dopamine neurodegeneration in part via iNOS-mediated nitric oxide production. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2017;74:2851–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Park SE, Song KI, Kim H, Chung S, Youn I. Graded 6-OHDA-induced dopamine depletion in the nigrostriatal pathway evokes progressive pathological neuronal activities in the subthalamic nucleus of a hemi-parkinsonian mouse. Behav Brain Res. 2018;344:42–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Cossu D, Yokoyama K, Sato S, Noda S, Sechi LA, Hattori N. PARKIN modifies peripheral immune response and increases neuroinflammation in active experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE). J Neuroimmunol. 2021;359:577694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Sliter DA, Martinez J, Hao L, Chen X, Sun N, Fischer TD, et al. Parkin and PINK1 mitigate STING-induced inflammation. Nature. 2018;561:258–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 61.Matheoud D, Sugiura A, Bellemare-Pelletier A, Laplante A, Rondeau C, Chemali M, et al. Parkinson’s Disease-Related Proteins PINK1 and Parkin Repress Mitochondrial Antigen Presentation. Cell. 2016;166:314–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Perego M, Yeon M, Agarwal E, Milcarek AT, Bertolini I, Camisaschi C, et al. Parkin activates innate immunity and promotes antitumor immune responses. J Clin Invest. 2025;135:e190291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 63.Fearnley JM, Lees AJ. Ageing and Parkinson’s disease: substantia nigra regional selectivity. Brain. 1991;114:2283–301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Marsden CD. Parkinson’s disease. Lancet. 1990;335:948–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Heo JY, Nam MH, Yoon HH, Kim J, Hwang YJ, Won W, et al. Aberrant Tonic Inhibition of Dopaminergic Neuronal Activity Causes Motor Symptoms in Animal Models of Parkinson’s Disease. Curr Biol. 2020;30:276–91.e9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Chen H, Cao J, Zha L, Wang P, Liu Z, Guo B, et al. Neuroprotective and neurogenic effects of novel tetramethylpyrazine derivative T-006 in Parkinson’s disease models through activating the MEF2-PGC1α and BDNF/CREB pathways. Aging (Albany NY). 2020;12:14897–917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Table 1 (77.7KB, docx)
Supplemental Table 2 (77.9KB, docx)
Supplemental Table 3 (83KB, docx)
Supplemental Table 4 (78.4KB, docx)
Supplemental Figure 1 (488.7KB, pdf)
Supplemental Figure 2 (235.1KB, pdf)
Supplemental Figure 3 (49KB, pdf)
Supplemental Figure 4 (351.4KB, pdf)
Supplemental Figure 5 (31.9KB, pdf)
Supplemental Figure 6 (483.8KB, pdf)
Supplemental Figure 7 (134.4KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

All data is included in this article or the supplementary material. Sequences are listed in the supplementary material.


Articles from Gene Therapy are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES