Abstract
Immunomodulatory imide drugs (IMiDs) designed on the backbone of thalidomide are highly effective in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). However, acquired resistance ultimately arises and leads to inevitable relapse. A key binding target of IMiDs is cereblon, the substrate recognition element within the E3 ubiquitin ligase complex, which triggers the degradation of neosubstrates that underpin IMiD anticancer and anti-inflammatory actions. A key acquired IMiD resistance mechanism is the down-regulation of cereblon in cancer cells. Introduction of a monoterpenoid group into the thalidomide backbone to replace the classic glutarimide that is involved in cereblon binding resulted in IMiD/monoterpenoid analogues that lack human cereblon binding. Polyfuorination of the phthalimide ring resulted in agents that possessed significant anti-proliferative action against lenalidomide sensitive (MM.1S) and resistant (U266 R10R) MM cells, as well as anti-angiogenesis and anti-inflammatory activities via cereblon-independent mechanisms. From our cellular studies in lenalidomide sensitive and resistant MM cell lines (anti-proliferative assay), human umbilical vein endothelial cells (anti-angiogenesis assay), and RAW 264.7 mouse macrophage cells challenged with lipopolysaccharide (anti-inflammatory assay), we describe four novel lead compounds that warrant further investigation as cereblon-independent IMiDs in cancer and inflammatory disorders.
Keywords: Immunomodulatory imide drugs, Thalidomide, Cereblon, Anti-Angiogenesis, Anti-inflammation, Multiple myeloma
1. Introduction
Thalidomide (α-N-phthalimido-glutarimide), initially prescribed as a sedative hypnotic in the mid-1950s and withdrawn in 1961 due to the development of severe congenital abnormalities in babies born to mothers using it for morning sickness [1,2], was discovered to possess anticancer actions in the mid-1990s [3,4]. These anticancer actions are derived from antiangiogenic, antiproliferative, and immunomodulatory properties, with the compound demonstrating clinical efficacy in multiple myeloma (MM) [5]. This hematological malignancy impacts 36, 000 Americans each year and results in 12,000 deaths [6]. Thalidomide was granted U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for MM in 2006, and structure-based drug design resulted in the later development and approval of the two related immunomodulatory imide drugs (IMiDs) lenalidomide and pomalidomide that are more effective still in MM [7–9].
Although widely evaluated and effectively used in preclinical and clinical research, the underpinning mechanism of action of thalidomide and related IMiDs remained unknown until Handa et al. identified the protein cereblon (CRBN) as a primary target in 2010 [10]. Among its functions, CRBN is a key protein within the DDB1–Cul4–Rbx1–CRBN (CRL4CRBN) E3 ubiquitin Ligase complex [10–13], which is found across species and is critical in the recognition and subsequent tagging/ubiquitination of endogenous neosubstrates. This leads to degradation, thereby regulating cellular function, which includes DNA repair, replication, and transcription. The binding of IMiDs to human CRBN modifies its neosubstrate recognition spectrum to recruit the IL-2 transcriptional repressors, Ikaros (IKZF1) and Aiolos (IKZF3), as well as spalt-like transcription factor 4 (SALL4), among other proteins, and induce their ubiquitination and subsequent degradation [11–13]. Ikaros and Aiolos, and their subsequent regulation of other key proteins, play a key role in promoting the survival and proliferation of MM cells, and IMiD–CRBN induced loss of this action accounts, in large part, for the anti-myeloma activity of thalidomide and clinical analogues [13]. In contrast, the well-known teratogenic action is, in part, consequent to IMiD-CRBN mediated SALL4 degradation [2,10–13]. However, it is feasible that other CRBN-dependent and independent actions could potentially be involved [2,14].
Despite the efficacy of currently available clinical IMiDs in MM, the inevitable development of drug resistance to IMiD therapy has become a pressing problem, highlighting the urgent need to both understand resistance mechanisms and develop new drugs to skirt them [9,13]. Hypothetically, any acquired abnormality in CRBN-related pathways in MM cells can result in a reduced IMiD sensitivity and/or development of drug resistance. Amongst mechanisms, a hallmark of IMiD resistance is CRBN loss or downregulation [9], whether related to a genetic alteration in CRBN or to one of its downstream effectors [9,13–16]. In this regard, IMiDs that mediate their anticancer actions through CRBN-independent mechanisms may not only prove active in resistant MM cells and refractory disease, but, additionally, may not be encumbered by teratogenicity mediated by SALL4 and/or other CRBN-associated processes.
Building on this theme, recent studies support the hypothesis that anticancer actions, including anti-angiogenesis and anti-proliferative ones, as well as anti-inflammatory actions, can be mediated by IMiDs, wholly and in part, via CRBN-independent mechanisms [17–21]. X-ray crystallography studies have demonstrated that the glutarimide ring common across thalidomide, lenolidomide, and pomalidomide binds within a surface pocket present on human CRBN (the thalidomide binding domain), comprising three tryptophan residues with a phenylalanine side-chain forming the base. CRBN binding orientates the phthalimide or isoindolinone portions of these compounds to protrude out of the pocket, thereby modifying human CRBN’s binding to favor interaction with a different set of proteins - Aiolos, Ikaros, SALL4, and other select neosubstrates [10–13]. Boichenko and Hartmann [22] have mapped the chemical ligand space that supports IMiD initial human CRBN binding. Among structural requirements, rings in excess of 6 carbons were not favored. Additionally, prior studies by Gütschow et al. [23–25], and Brown et al. [26] suggest that fluorination can augment IMiD anticancer activity. In this light, we synthesized and evaluated a novel series of monoterpenoid fluorophthalimides and describe a subset of 8 particularly interesting ones. Replacement of an IMiD’s glutarimide ring by a monoterpenoid moiety would not be expected to support human cereblon binding. Additionally, monoterpenoids have been reported to possess a broad range of biological actions, supporting their application and use as fungicidal, antiviral, antimicrobial, anticoagulant, antimalarial, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anticancer agents as well as flavors and fragrances [27,28]; thereby, making them interesting compounds in medicinal chemistry.
2. Methods and experimentals
2.1. Chemistry
Melting points (uncorrected) were measured with a Fisher-Johns apparatus. 1H NMR, 19F NMR, and 13C NMR spectra were obtained on a Varian Mercury Plus 400 spectrometer at 400 MHz, 377 MHz, and 101 MHz, respectively, at room temperature. GC/MS (m/z) spectra were measured on an Agilent Technologies (Santa Clara, CA, USA) 7890B GC equipped with an HP-5MS column and a 5977B mass-selective ion detector in the electron-impact mode. LC/MS spectra were recorded on an Agilent 6125-LC-MS Single Quad system. Elemental analyses were performed by Atlantic Microlab, Inc. (Norcross, GA, USA). All isopinocampheylamine, myrtanylamine, bornylamine, and 2-aminonorbornane hydrochloride were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO, USA) and used as received. X-ray crystallography analyses were performed in the Small Molecule X-ray Facility, Department of Chemistry, Johns Hopkins University.
2.1.1. 4,5,6,7-Tetrafluoro-2-((1S,2S,3S,5R)-2,6,6-trimethylbicyclo [3.1.1]heptan-3-yl)isoindoline-1,3-dione (1)
A mixture of 352.8 mg (1.6 mmol) of tetrafluorophthalic anhydride and 245.7 mg (1.6 mmol) of (1S,2S,3S,5R)-(+)-isopinocampheylamine in 8 mL of acetic acid was stirred for 3 h under a nitrogen atmosphere at 100 °C (oil bath). After removing the solvent, the residue was purified by preparative TLC (MeOH/CH2Cl2 = 1/50) to give 91.7 mg of 1 as a white crystal (16.1 %). Mp 150.2–151.6 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 4.65 (q, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 2.51 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 2.38 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 2.29 (t, J = 12.5 Hz, 1H), 2.23 (dd, J = 12.5, 12.9 Hz, 1H), 2.06 (s, 1H), 1.90 (s, 1H), 1.80 (d, J = 9.8 Hz, 1H), 1.28 (s, 3H), 1.13 (s, 3H) and 1.02 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 162.8, 144.9 (d, JCF = 269.3 Hz), 143.3 (d, JCF = 260.9 Hz), 113.6, 50.2, 48.2, 42.0, 40.3, 39.1, 32.8, 31.6, 28.2, 23.8 and 20.3 ppm; 19F NMR (CDCl3) δ −137.0 (d, J = 10.9 Hz, 2F) and −143.3 (d, J = 10.9 Hz, 2F) ppm; GC-MS (CI/CH4), m/z 356 (MH+); Anal. Calcd for C18H17F4NO2: C, 60.84; H, 4.82 and N, 3.94. Found: C, 60.78; H, 4.86 and N, 3.96.
2.1.2. 2-(((1S,2R,5S)-6,6-dimethylbicyclo[3.1.1]heptan-2-yl)methyl)-4,5,6,7-tetrafluoroisoindoline-1,3-dione (2)
A mixture of 352.8 mg (1.6 mmol) of tetrafluorophthalic anhydride and 245.7 mg (1.6 mmol) of (−)-cis-myrtanylamine in 8 mL of acetic acid was stirred for 3 h under a nitrogen atmosphere at 100 °C (oil bath). After removing the solvent, the residue was purified by preparative TLC (MeOH/CH2Cl2 = 1/75) to give 298.1 mg of 2 as white needle crystals (52.3 %). Mp 160.0–161.0 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 3.70–3.64 (m, 2H), 2.48 (s, 1H), 2.33 (s, 1H), 1.98–1.80 (m, 5H), 1.54 (s, 1H), 1.20 (s, 3H), 1.17 (s, 3H) and 0.86 (d, J = 9.4 Hz, 1H) ppm; 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 162.7, 144.9 (d, JCF = 256.4 Hz), 143.2 (d, JCF = 265.5 Hz), 113.7 (d, JCF = 7.6 Hz), 44.0, 43.2, 41.1, 39.6, 38.7, 32.9, 27.7, 25.8, 22.8 and 19.1 ppm; 19F NMR (CDCl3) δ −135.8 (t, J = 10.9 Hz, 2F) and −142.6 (d, J = 10.9 Hz, 2F) ppm; GC-MS (CI/CH4), m/z 356 (MH+); Anal. Calcd for C18H17F4NO2: C, 60.84; H, 4.82; F, 21.39 and N, 3.94. Found: C, 61.05; H, 4.87; F, 21.20 and N, 3.98.
2.1.3. 4,5,6,7-Tetrafluoro-2-((1R,2S,4R)-1,7,7-trimethylbicyclo[2.2.1] heptan-2-yl)isoindoline-1,3-dione (3)
A mixture of 1.33 g (6.0 mmol) of tetrafluorophthalic anhydride and 0.925 g (6.0 mmol) of (R)-(+)-bornylamine in 29 mL of acetic acid was stirred for 18.0 h under a nitrogen atmosphere at 120 °C (oil bath). After removing the solvent, the residue was first purified by preparative TLC (CH2Cl2), and then recrystallized twice with acetone to give 0.26 g of 3 as white crystals (12.1 %). Mp 131.5–132.5 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 4.51 (qq, J = 2.7, 2.7 Hz, 1H), 2.41 (dd, J = 5.5, 5.5 Hz, 1H), 1.97 (ttt, J = 4.7, 3.7, 4.6 Hz, 1H), 1.88–1.72 (m, 3H), 1.53–1.46 (m, 1H), 1.37 (qqq, J = 2.5, 2.4, 2.6 Hz, 1H), 1.02 (s, 3H), 0.92 (s, 3H) and 0.80 (s, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 164.0, 144.9 (d, JCF = 263.6 Hz), 143.2 (d, JCF = 266.7 Hz), 113.6 (d, JCF = 6.9 Hz), 59.1, 51.9, 47.8, 45.5, 29.9, 27.0, 26.8, 19.7, 18.7 and 14.1 ppm; 19F NMR (CDCl3) δ −137.0 (d, J = 10.9 Hz, 2F) and −142.9 (d, J = 12.3 Hz, 2F) ppm; LC-MS, ESI (+), m/z 356 (MH+); Anal. Calcd for C18H17F4NO2: C, 60.84; H, 4.82; F, 21.39 and N, 3.94. Found: C, 60.79; H, 4.83; F, 21.47 and N, 3.93.
2.1.4. 2-Endo-(bicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-yl)-4,5,6,7-tetrafluoroisoindoline-1,3-dione (4)
A mixture of 1.33 g (6.0 mmol) of tetrafluorophthalic anhydride, 0.89 g (6.0 mmol) of 2-aminonorbornane hydrochloride and 0.611 g (6.04 mmol) of triethylamine in 29 mL of acetic acid was stirred for 36.5 h under a nitrogen atmosphere at 100 °C (oil bath). After removing solvent, the residue was purified by preparative TLC (CH2Cl2), and then recrystallized with acetone to give 0.23 g of 4 as flaky white crystals (12.2 %). Mp 173.0–174.0 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 4.43–4.38 (m, 1H), 4.12–4.07* (m, 0.1H), 2.54 (s, 1H), 2.46–2.40 (m, 2H), 2.23–2.13* (m, 0.24H), 1.82–1.70 (m, 2H), 1.63–1.35 (m, 5H) and 1.35–1.18* (0.29H) ppm; 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 163.7, 144.8 (d, JCF = 269.3 Hz), 143.2 (d, JCF = 263.2 Hz), 113.6, 56.4*, 55.7, 42.3, 42.0*, 37.9, 37.3, 37.1*, 36.3*, 36.0*, 28.8, 27.9 and 23.3 ppm; 19F NMR (CDCl3) δ −136.9 (m, 2F) and −142.9 (m, 2F) ppm; LC-MS, ESI (+), m/z 314 (MH+); Anal. Calcd for C15H11F4NO2: C, 57.51; H, 3.54, F, 24.26 and N, 4.47. Found: C, 57.59; H, 3.54; F, 24.06 and N, 4.47. [*The data came from the 2-exo-diastereomer of 4. 2-Chiral starting material of 4 came from 2-aminonorbornane hydrochloride produced by Sigma-Aldrich Company and it also showed a similar minor 2-exo-aminonorbornane hydrochloride diastereomer in its 1H NMR (in solvent DMSO-d6)]. The X-ray crystallography analysis showed this compound was not enantiomerically pure. The NMR and X-ray crystallographic data showed that compound 4 was primarily the 2-endo diastereomer.
2.1.5. 4,7-Difluoro-2-((1R,2R,3R,5S)-2,6,6-trimethylbicyclo[3.1.1] heptan-3-yl)isoindoline-1,3-dione (5)
A mixture of 184.1 mg (1.0 mmol) of difluorophthalic anhydride and 153.3 mg (1.0 mmol) of (1R,2R,3R,5S)-(−)-isopinocampheylamine in 5 mL of acetic acid was stirred for 3 h under a nitrogen atmosphere at 100 °C (oil bath). After removing solvent, the residue was purified by preparative TLC (MeOH/CH2Cl2 = 1/75) to give 60.8 mg of 5 as white crystals (19.0 %). Mp 89.5–90.5 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 7.36 (s, 2H), 4.66 (q, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 2.54 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 2.37 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 2.32–2.21 (m, 2H), 2.05 (s, 1H), 1.90–1.84 (m, 2H), 1.28 (s, 3H), 1.14 (s, 3H) and 1.02 (d, J = 7.1Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 164.3, 153.6 (d, JCF = 264.0 Hz), 124.6 (t, JCF = 15.3 Hz), 118.7 (t, JCF = 7.6 Hz), 49.6, 48.3, 42.1, 40.2, 39.1, 32.8, 31.6, 28.2, 23.8 and 20.3 ppm; 19F NMR (CDCl3) δ −118.5 (s, 2F) ppm; GC-MS (CI/CH4), m/z 320 (MH+); Anal. Calcd for C18H19F2NO2: C, 67.70; H, 6.00 and N, 4.39. Found:C, 67.76; H, 5.92 and N, 4.34.
2.1.6. 4,7-Difluoro-2-((1S,2S,3S,5R)-2,6,6-trimethylbicyclo[3.1.1] heptan-3-yl)isoindoline-1,3-dione (6)
A mixture of 184.1 mg (1.0 mmol) of difluorophthalic anhydride and 153.3 mg (1.0 mmol) of (1S,2S,3S,5R)-(+)-isopinocampheylamine in 5 mL of acetic acid was stirred for 3 h under a nitrogen atmosphere at 100 °C (oil bath). After removing solvent, the residue was purified by preparative TLC (MeOH/CH2Cl2 = 1/75) to give 68.0 mg of 6 as white crystals (21.3 %). Mp 89.0–90.0 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 7.36 (d, J = 5.1 Hz, 2H), 4.66 (q, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 2.54 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 2.37 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 2.33–2.20 (m, 2H), 2.05 (s, 1H), 1.90–1.84 (m, 2H), 1.28 (s, 3H), 1.14 (s, 3H) and 1.02 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 164.6, 153.6 (d, JCF = 264.0 Hz), 124.9 (t, JCF = 15.3 Hz), 119.1, 50.0, 48.7, 42.5, 40.6, 39.4, 33.2, 32.0, 28.6, 24.2 and 20.7 ppm; 19F NMR (CDCl3) δ −118.3 (s, 2F) ppm; GC-MS (CI/CH4), m/z 320 (MH+); Anal. Calcd for C18H19F2NO2: C, 67.70; H, 6.00 and N, 4.39. Found: C, 67.68; H, 6.08 and N, 4.40.
2.1.7. 2-(((1S,2R,5S)-6,6-dimethylbicyclo[3.1.1]heptan-2-yl)methyl)-4,7-difluoroisoindoline-1,3-dione (7)
A mixture of 184.1 mg (1.0 mmol) of difluorophthalic anhydride and 153.3 mg (1.0 mmol) of (−)-cis-myrtanylamine in 5 mL of acetic acid was stirred for 3 h under a nitrogen atmosphere at 100 °C (oil bath). After removing solvent, the residue was purified by preparative TLC (MeOH/CH2Cl2 = 1/75) to give 312.6 mg of 7 as white crystals (97.9 %). Mp 130.0–131.5 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 7.36 (s, 2H), 3.74–3.61 (m, 2H), 2.51 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 2.33 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 2.01–1.83 (m, 5H), 1.59–1.55 (m, 1H), 1.20 (s, 3H), 1.18 (s, 3H) and 0.86 (d, J = 9.8 Hz, 1H) ppm; 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 164.2, 153.6 (d, JCF = 264.0 Hz), 124.6 (d, JCF = 1l7.6 Hz), 118.7, 43.6, 43.3, 41.2, 39.7, 38.7, 33.0, 27.8, 25.9, 22.9 and 19.1 ppm; 19F NMR (CDCl3) δ −118.4 (t, J = 5.5 Hz, 2F) ppm; GC-MS (CI/CH4), m/z 320 (MH+); Anal. Calcd for C18H19F2NO2: C, 67.70; H, 6.00 and N 4.39. Found: C, 67.89; H, 6.03 and N, 4.22.
2.1.8. 2-Endo-(bicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-yl)-4,7-difluoroisoindoline-1,3-dione (8)
A mixture of 184.1 mg (1.0 mmol) of difluorophthalic anhydride, 147.6 mg (1.0 mmol) of 2-aminonorbornane hydrochloride and 101.2 mg (1.0 mmol) of triethylamine in 5 mL of acetic acid was stirred for 3 h under a nitrogen atmosphere at 100 °C (oil bath). After removing solvent, the residue was purified by preparative TLC (MeOH/CH2Cl2 = 1/75) to give 36.1 mg of 8 as white crystals (13.0 %). Mp 93.5–94.5 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 7.35 (s, 2H), 4.44–4.40 (m, 1H), 4.16–4.09* (m, 0.1H), 2.54 (s, 1H), 2.51–2.39 (m, 2H), 2.26–2.16* (m, 0.19H), 1.76 (t, J = 10.2 Hz, 2H), 1.54–1.29 (m, 5H) and 1.28–1.15* (m, 0.21H) ppm; 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 165.2, 153.5 (d, JCF = 264.4 Hz), 124.5 (d, JCF = 17.6 Hz), 118.6 (d, JCF = 7.6 Hz), 55.9*, 55.2, 42.3, 42.0*, 37.9, 37.4, 37.1*, 36.4*, 36.0*, 28.8, 27.9 and 23.4 ppm; 19F NMR (CDCl3) δ −119.3 (s, 2F) ppm; GC-MS (CI/CH4), m/z 277 (M+); Anal. Calcd for C15H13F2NO2: C, 64.98; H, 4.73; F, 13.70 and N, 5.05. Found: C, 64.85; H, 4.62; F, 13.44 and N, 5.00. [*The data came from the 2-exo-diastereomer of 8. 2-Chiral starting material of 8 came from 2-aminonorbornane hydrochloride produced by Sigma-Aldrich Company and it also showed a similar minor 2-exo-aminonorbornane hydrochloride diastereomer in its 1H NMR (in solvent DMSO-d6)]. The NMR data showed compound 8 was primarily a 2-endo diastereomer.
2.2. Cell Culture
Experimental compounds and comparators were prepared in DMSO (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA), which was ultimately diluted to either 0.1 % or 0.5 %.
2.2.1. U266 R10R (lenalidomide resistant) human multiple myeloma cells
U266 R10R cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 Medium (Gibco, Gaithersburg, MD) plus 15 % fetal bovine serum (R&D BioSystems, Minneapolis, MN) and 1 % penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco, Billings, MT, USA) and used within 3 months of their thaw date. Acquired resistance to lenalidomide was induced by culturing cells in 10 μM lenalidomide. Prior to use in experiments, cells were split into two flasks: one flask with 10 μM lenalidomide treatment and one without lenalidomide. The latter ‘starved’ cells were used in experiments. To split, the cells were detached physically using a cell scraper and split into a new flask with a ratio of old media and new media. Cells were cultured in 5 % CO2 and 95 % air at 37 %. Compounds 1–8 were evaluated at 10 μM, whereas controls and comparators included 0.5 % DMSO and 30 μM lenalidomide.
2.2.2. MM.1S (human multiple myeloma) cells
MM.1S cells (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) were grown in RPMI media supplemented with 10 % FBS, penicillin 100 U/mL, and streptomycin 100 mg/mL, and maintained at 37 °C and 5 % CO2. MM.1S cells were treated with drug (0.1–10 μM) prepared in DMSO and diluted to a final 0.5 % amount, which was used as a vehicle control.
2.2.3. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs)
HUVECs (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland) were cultured in EBM-2 Endothelial Cell Growth Basal Medium (Lonza) plus EGM Plus Endothelial SingleQuot Kit (Lonza) and used until passage 8 post-thawing. Cells were maintained in collagen coated flasks or Petri dishes. To split, the cells were detached using TryplE Express (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) and resuspended in full media. Cells were cultured in 5 % CO2 and 95 % air at 37 °C. Compounds 1–8 were evaluated at 10 μM, whereas controls and comparators included 0.1 % DMSO, 100 μM Thalidomide, and 30 μM CPS49.
2.2.4. RAW 264.7 mouse macrophage cells
RAW 264.7 cells were obtained from ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA) and grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s (DMEM), high glucose, Gluta-MAX™ media supplemented with 10 % FBS (ThermoFisher Scientific, Asheville, NC, USA). Cells were maintained at 37 °C and 5 % CO2, were propagated as described by ATCC guidelines, and were cultured following the methods described in Tweedie et al., 2009 [30]. RAW 264.7 cells were treated either with drug vehicle (0.1 % DMSO, Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) or compounds 1–8 (1–60 μM; n = 3–4/treatment group). One hour later, cells were challenged with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (60 ng/ml, E. Coli O55:B5, Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA). This LPS concentration was selected from pilot studies to provide a submaximal inflammatory insult. Twenty-four hours later, culture media was collected to quantify cell viability (CellTiter 96® Aqueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay kit (MTS); Promega, Madison, WI, USA, Cat #G3580), secreted TNF-α protein (ELISA MAX™ Deluxe Set Mouse TNF-α, BioLegend, CA, USA, Cat # 430915) and nitrite (Griess Reagent System, Promega, Madison, WI, USA, Cat #G2930).
2.3. Assays
2.3.1. Cell proliferation (viability) assay (CCK-8)
The anti-proliferative (cytotoxic) effects of compounds 1–8 were evaluated in the CCK-8 assay (an assay measuring cell viability) using the U266 R10R and MM.1S cell lines (20,000 cells/well in 50 μL in a 96-well plate). At 24 h later, an equal amount of treatment media containing vehicle (0.5 % DMSO), 10 μM lenalidomide or test compounds 1–8 at 10 μM was plated on top of the seeded cells for 72 h. Cell proliferation was thereafter determined by the addition of 10 μL of CCK-8 reagent (Dojindo Laboratories, Rockville, MD), which was incubated for 2 h, and absorbance at 450 nm λ was measured on a microplate reader (SpectraMax iD3, Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA) [20].
2.3.2. Human endothelial cell tube formation (Lattice) assay
The tube formation assay quantitatively determines the anti-angiogenic actions of experimental compounds. Specifically, 60 μL of the In Vitro Angiogenesis Kit (Millipore Sigma, Rockville, MD) ECMatrix was plated into a 96-well plate, which was incubated for 30 min. Thereafter, HUVECs were split and plated onto this gel (35,000 cells/well) and were administered either vehicle (control: 0.1 % DMSO), or 30 μM CPS49 (positive control), or 100 μM thalidomide (comparator), or the test compounds 1–8 at 10 μM. The plate was then incubated for 18 h and, thereafter, imaged analysis of tubule formation was quantified by use of ImageJ [25].
2.3.3. Cereblon (human) binding assay
The binding of compounds to human cereblon was quantitatively evaluated by bead-based AlphaScreen technology (BPS Bioscience catalog no. 79770), following the manufacturer’s protocol with minimal changes. Compounds 1–8 and pomalidomide (positive control) were incubated with reaction mixtures. This comprised cereblon/DNA damage-binding protein 1-Cullin 4a-ring-box protein 1 complex (CRBN/DDB1–CUL4A–Rbx1, 12.5 ng) and bromodomain-containing protein 3 (BRD3) (6.25 ng), and used an Optiplate 384-well plate (PerkinElmer catalog no. 6007290). After a 30 min incubation at room temperature (with shaking), AlphaLISA anti-FLAG Acceptor and Alpha Glutathione Donor beads (PerkinElmer) were successively added and a further 1 h room temperature incubation was performed for each of the added chemicals. Finally, alpha counts were recorded on a Synergy Neo2 (BioTek, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA). Following the subtraction of the “blank (background) value” from all readings, the relative activity of the alpha signal was then calculated, and the value of the vehicle group was defined as 100 %.
2.4. Molecular modeling monoterpenoid-based IMiDs docking with human cereblon
A molecular docking study was conducted on the crystal structure of human cereblon in complex with DDB1 (damage specific DNA binding protein 1) and lenalidomide (PDB ID - 4TZ4) utilizing the Glide program, which is part of the Schrödinger molecular modeling package, with extra precision (XP). The human cereblon protein structure was selected to improve the comprehensiveness and reliability of docking predictions by incorporating structural diversity, accuracy, variability in binding sites, and redundancy in validation. This PDB entry contains the native ligand lenalidomide within its structure. The structure was constructed using the protein preparation wizard in the Schrödinger module. This process included the addition of hydrogen atoms and the removal of water molecules beyond 5 Å from the binding sites. Active site grid were generated utilizing the Receptor Grid Generation tool within the Glide module (Maestro, Schrödinger Release 2023–2). The docking experiment involved the re-docking of Lenalidomide. LigPrep (Schrödinger) was employed to assess the chiralities of lenalidomide and subsequently convert it into a 3D structure (LigPrep, Schrödinger Release 2023–2). The OPLS_2005 force field was utilized to facilitate ionization and tautomeric states. The Schrödinger molecular modeling package Glide, specifically the grid-based ligand docking with extra precision (XP) tool, was utilized to enhance the accuracy of molecular docking. Eight monoterpenoid-based IMiDs were then docked at the active site of lenalidomide to analyze the binding and associated interactions by applying the same ligand preparation protocol.
2.5. Statistical analysis
Multiple within-subject comparisons were conducted using a Dunnett’s test (with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons, when appropriate). The statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 7 (San Diego, CA, USA), with a predefined significance level of p < 0.05 for each assessment. All presented data are expressed throughout the text as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). The number of samples per group (n) is provided within each Figure legend.
3. Results and discussion
Chemistry (synthesis):
As illustrated in Schemes 1 and 2, either tetra- or di-fluorophthalic anhydrides were condensated with selected monoterpenoid moieties, such as N-isopinocampheyl (as in 1,5,6), N-bornyl (as in 3), N-norbornyl (as in 4,8), and N-myrtanyl (as in 2,7) groups and, ultimately, were converted to a variety of novel bridged-ring agents (Scheme 1: compounds 1–4; Scheme 2: compounds 5–8).
Scheme 1.

Reagents and conditions: (i) (1S,2S,3S,5R)-(+)-isopinocampheylamine (for 1), acetic acid, N2, 100 °C, 3 h; (ii) (−)-cis-myrtanylamine (for 2), acetic acid, N2, 100 °C, 3 h; (iii) (R)-(+)-bornylamine (3), acetic acid, N2, 120 °C, 18 h; (iv) 2-aminonorbornane hydrochloride (for 4), Et3N, aceticic acid, N2, 100 °C, 36.5 h.
Scheme 2.

Reagents and conditions: (i) (1R,2R,3R,5S)-(−)-isopinocampheylamine (for 5), acetic acid, N2, 100 °C, 3 h; (ii) (1S,2S,3S,5R)-(+)-isopinocampheylamine (for 6), acetic acid, N2, 100 °C, 3 h; (iii) (−)-cis-myrtanylamine (for 7), acetic acid, N2, 100 °C, 3 h; (iv) 2-aminonorbornane hydrochloride (for 8), Et3N, acetic acid, N2, 100 °C, 3 h.
The synthesis of compounds 1–8, with representative examples and chemical characterization, is described below (Methods). Notably, for select compounds, their three-dimensional structure and stereochemical equilibrium were confirmed by X-ray crystallography and are described below and in the Supplemental information (Appendix A. Supplementary data) [29]).
Human cereblon concentration-dependent binding of compounds 1–8:
Human CRBN, an evolutionary conserved 441- or 442-amino acid protein that was initially reported as a gene product associated with a mild mental disability [31], was later identified as the primary target of thalidomide [10–13]. CRBN, additionally, is a substrate recognition receptor for Cullin 4 RING E3 ubiquitin ligase, which is part of the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) - a major pathway accountable for the degradation of >80 % of proteins in eukaryotic cells [32]. Thalidomide and related IMiDs bind to human CRBN, triggering the recruitment of non-native substrates to the E3 ubiquitin ligase and their consequential proteasomal degradation [32]. The premise underpinning our generation of monoterpenoid-based IMiDs is that the generated bridged-like ring structure present, in leu of the glutarimide ring of thalidomide and clinical analogues, would provide complexity and size to, thereby, preclude the alignment and binding of these compounds into the shallow surface thalidomide binding domain present in the C-terminal of human CRBN. A bead-based AlphaScreen luminescence assay was hence used to evaluate the binding of 8 monoterpenoid-based IMiDs to human CRBN in which pomalidomide was used as a positive control.
As evident from the concentration-dependent plots of compounds shown in Fig. 1, a potent interaction was found between pomalidomide (used as a positive control) and human CRBN as evaluated by a cereblon/BRD3 binding FRET assay (IC50 binding values between 3.743 and 4.42 μM). In contrast, the CRBN binding of monoterpenoid-based IMiDs 1–8 possessed IC50 values in the range of 43 to >100 μM (Fig. 1), which are indicative of negligible binding (i.e., it is in line with a background level of binding).
Fig. 1.

Human cereblon binding: Concentration-dependent evaluation of the interaction between monoterpenoid-based IMiDs 1–8 and human cereblon by FRET assay provided an IC50 value for Pomalidomide (Pom) of between 3.74 and 4.42 μM (positive control), and values for 1–8 were equal to and in excess of 42.87 μM (N = 3 per plot) – indicative of a lack of binding to human cereblon.
Our results align with studies of Boichenko and Hartmann [22] that defined the basic requirements for IMiD ligand binding within the human CRBN thalidomide binding pocket. Replacing the glutarimide moiety with a variety of other structures, they determined that at least one carbonyl group is essential for human CRBN binding, and this should be in the 6′-position in relation to the structure of thalidomide or pomalidomide. Furthermore, in both 6- and 5-membered rings, imides provided potent binding and that lactams and cyclic rings with the functional group R–NH–CO–R′ would bind [22]. In contrast, rings lacking these features and, in particular, 7-membered or larger rings would minimally bind. In this regard, the bridged-like ring structures of monoterpenoid-based IMiDs 1–8, have greater complexity and size than glutarimide, and lack the key structural features considered essential to human CRBN binding (i.e., a nitrogen containing ring and/or carbonyl moiety), which is consistent with their high IC50 values – indicative of negligible/poor CRBN binding.
Molecular modeling evaluation of human cereblon interaction:
To clarify the structural basis underpinning the substantial differences in the measured IC50 binding values between compounds 1–8 and a classic glutarimide-containing IMiD, molecular modeling studies were performed on the structure of human CRBN co-crystalized with lenalidomide (1:1) [33]. An initial evaluation of docking accuracy was performed by re-docking the co-crystal ligand lenalidomide (PDB entry: 4TZ4 [33]) into its ligand-binding site, and then calculating the RMSD (Root Mean square Deviation value) between the native and docked conformations. The proximity of the redocked ligand into its original position indicated that the grid box dimensions (20 × 20 × 20 Å; 0.1 Å spacing) constructed around the CRBN target were adequate for docking a native-like ligand from the monoterpenoid-based IMiDs dataset. The structure of the glutarimide moiety, along with essential polar and hydrophobic pocket-lining residues within the docking grid, confirmed that the intermolecular interactions established by lenalidomide with human CRBN protein residues are compatable with human CRBN interaction and binding.
Specifically, Fig. 2 illustrates the docked conformation of the co-crystallized ligand lenalidomide with human CRBN protein. The optimal docking pose, exhibiting a binding energy of −11.69 kcal/mol (Table 1), was identified, and demonstrated a RMSD of 0.12 Å (an indication of close replication to the previously reported docking [33]). The re-docked pose of lenalidomide within the thalidomide binding domain of human CRBN included four hydrogen bonds (with Asn351, His378, Trp380) and one π-π stacking interaction (His353) (Fig. 2A and B). In direct comparison to this, compound 5 exhibits the highest binding energy of −3.92 kcal/mol of the evaluated monoterpenoid-based IMiDs 1–8 (Table 1), and only one hydrogen bond interaction with Cys343 was evident (Fig. 2C and D). Notably, no interactions were evident between the monoterpenoid ring conformation and human CRBN. This lack of interactions was confirmed in our molecular modeling of the other 7 monoterpenoid-based IMiDs. Hence, the binding energy scores of compounds 1–8 are substantially different from that of lenalidomide in relation to human CRBN binding, and align with the negligible experimentally measured binding of compounds 1–8 to human CRBN (Fig. 1).
Fig. 2. Docking poses of the crystal structure of human cereblon in complex with DDB1 and either lenalidomide (PDB ID:4TZ4 [33]) or monoterpenoid fluorophthalimide compound 5.

(A) 3-D interactions of lenalidomide with interacting amino acids of human CRBN complex; (B) 2-D interactions of lenalidomide with interacting amino acids of human CRBN complex; (C) 3-D interactions of compound 5 with interacting amino acids of human CRBN complex and (D) 2-D interactions of compound 5 with interacting amino acids of human CRBN complex.
Table 1.
MPO scores and molecular modeling determined docking scores of lenalidomide and monoterpenoid fluorophthalimides 1–8 to human Cereblon (4TZ4).
| Compound | Docking scorea (-kcal/mol) | MPO scoreb |
|---|---|---|
| Lenalidomide | −11.69 | 5.4 |
| 1 | −2.69 | 4.47 |
| 2 | −3.14 | 4.52 |
| 3 | −2.58 | 4.37 |
| 4 | −2.90 | 5.34 |
| 5 | −3.92 | 4.75 |
| 6 | −3.45 | 4.75 |
| 7 | −2.98 | 4.80 |
| 8 | −3.02 | 5.62 |
Docking scores were determined in relation to human cereblon (4TZ4).
MPO (CNS multiparameter optimization) score [54].
Anti-angiogenesis activity in human umbilical vein endothelial cells:
The process of angiogenesis, resulting in the generation of new blood vessels from the preexisting vascular network, plays a crucial role in the growth, metastasis, and survival of tumors. This includes hematological cancers, such as MM [34,35], in which monoclonal plasma cells within the bone marrow, similar to other tumor cells, secrete pro-angiogenic factors that stimulate the sprouting of new vessels from nearby capillaries to induce vascular development and, ultimately, to support tumor growth. Furthermore, time- and tissue-dependent angiogenesis is undoubtedly critical in embryonic and fetal development, and may, in part, underpin the teratogenicity of thalidomide [2, 14,36–38]. The angiogenesis process involves the proliferation and migration of host endothelial cells, and their rearrangement to form tube-like structures that, ultimately, develop into functional capillary vessels to augment tumor oxygen and nutrient delivery. Such vessels within tumors are often ill-formed, leaky, and tortuous and, thereby, permit metastatic spread [39,40]. Targeting angiogenesis as a cancer therapy has hence become an intense area of scientific focus to inhibit cancer progression and induce regression. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) generate hollow tube-like structures when cultured on biological gels, such as ECMatrix, and tubule formation can then be used as a simple in vitro measure of angiogenesis (the lattice assay: Fig. 3A).
Fig. 3.

Anti-angiogenesis activity: In vitro screen of compounds 1–8 was performed in a HUVEC tube formation (lattice) assay. Compounds 1–8 (10 μM) were evaluated in comparison to 0.1 % DMSO (vehicle control), CPS49 (30 μM) (positive control) and thalidomide (100 μM). (A) Representative images of the tube formation assay in relation to evaluated compounds. (B) Graph representing mean area of lattice formation relative to the vehicle control. Whereas treatment with tetrafluoro monoterpenoid-based IMiDs 1–4 inhibited tube formation, difluoro analogues 5–8 lacked activity. N = 3 independent experiments with at least 3 technical replicates per experiment, *p < 0.05 vs. control value (0.1 % DMSO.
A previously optimized lattice assay [17,19] was hence used for compound screening at 10 μM to evaluate anti-angiogenic activity. The known anti-angiogenic agent CPS49 (30 μM), together with thalidomide (100 μM), was assessed alongside, which demonstrated potent and a lack of activity, respectively, consistent with prior studies [17,19,20,23,25]. As shown in Fig. 3, whereas tetrafluorinated compounds 1–4 blocked tube formation, their difluorinated equivalents, 5–8, lacked anti-angiogenic action. Notably, the anti-angiogenic activity of non-CRBN binding compounds 1–4 is in line with the demonstration by Beedie et al. [17] of an IMiD-mediated cereblon-independent anti-angiogenic mechanism in siRNA-mediated CRBN knockdown HUVEC cells in which a loss of CRBN does not eliminate thalidomide’s anti-angiogenic activity [17]. In concert with this, enhanced CRBN binding does not appear to correlate with the anti-angiogenic effects of thalidomide analogues from in silico studies [18], reinforcing the presence of CRBN-independent anti-angiogenic pathways. Also of interest, CPS49, which was used as a positive control in the HUVEC assay consequent to its known anti-angiogenic actions, is a highly fluorinated IMiD with a modified glutarimide ring – similar to but, albeit, structurally different from compounds 1–4. However, whereas CPS49 has been described to generate thalidomide-like induced limb damage in chicken embryos [41], compound 3 (also known as tetrafluorobornylphthalimide (TFBP) [21]) lacked adverse activity when similarly administered to chicken embryos [21].
Anti-proliferative activity against lenalidomide sensitive and resistant multiple myeloma cells:
The development of drug resistance is a primary mechanism underpinning relapse during cancer treatment [42]. In this light, the anti-proliferative activity (cytotoxicity) of compounds 1–8 was evaluated in two human MM cell lines: one sensitive to the widely used IMiD, lenalidomide (MM.1S), and the other resistant to it (U266 R10R). As shown in Fig. 4, tetrafluorinated compounds 1–4 substantially inhibited the cell viability of lenalidomide sensitive (A) and resistant (B) tumor cells. In contrast, their difluorinated analogues, 5–8, substantially lacked activity across both MM cell types. This result is in line with the anti-proliferative activity of CPS49 and the actions of the novel compound Gu1215, both of which are heavily fluorinated IMiDs [20]. Notably, CPS49 has been reported to be a redox-reactive thalidomide analogue that induces cancer cell cytotoxicity by elevating reactive oxygen species [43]. This and other CRBN-independent mechanisms may underpin the anti-proliferative actions of compounds 1–4.
Fig. 4.

Anti-proliferative (loss of cell viability) actions: treatment with tetrafluoro monoterpenoid-based IMiDs 1–4 substantially reduced the viability of both (A) MM.1S (lenalidomide sensitive) and (B) U266 R10R (lenalidomide resistant) human MM cells at a concentration of 10 μM (pink/red bars). In contrast, difluorinated IMiDs 5–8 largely lacked activity at 10 μM in the same cell lines (blue bars). Cell viability compared to Vehicle control (without drug) samples across MM.1S and U266 R10R cell lines. N = 2 independent experiments for compounds 1–4. For compounds 5 to 8, N = 1 independent experiment (due to a lack of activity). Both experiments were completed with 4 technical replicates. *p < 0.05 vs. control value (0.5 % DMSO).
Anti-inflammatory actions in LPS-challenged RAW 264.7 cells:
Our prior studies have demonstrated that IMiDs can effectively mitigate LPS-mediated inflammation in RAW 264.7 cells – a monocyte/macrophage-like cell line that is often compared to peripheral macrophages and CNS microglia [21,30,44,45]. As shown in Fig. 5, all compounds in the present study significantly mitigated inflammation (reducing LPS-elevated nitrite and/or TNF-α levels), with the exception of compound 8. Notably, however, tetrafluorinated IMiDs 1–4 proved to be more potent than difluorinated 5–8, with the former inducing a decline in pro-inflammatory markers at a concentration of 1 μM whereas the latter required 10 μM (Fig. 5 upper and lower panels, respectively). This greater anti-inflammatory potency of the more fluorinated IMiDs 1–4, vs. 5–8, is intruiging in the light of the reported anti-inflammatory actions of phthalimide [46,47], as well as of monoterpenoids [27,28] and warrants further evaluation.
Fig. 5.

Anti-inflammatory activity: compounds 1–8 were evaluated in RAW 264.7 cell challenged with a submaximal dose of LPS (60 ng/ml) to induce inflammation, and assays were performed 24 h thereafter (MTS: cell viability (green bar); Nitrite a stable marker of nitric oxide (blue bar); TNF-α a prominent pro-inflammatory cytokine (red bar)). Values are expressed as a percent of control (CNT: vehicle without drug) values. Number of observations (n = 4). Significance markers are * p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.
Of note, the anti-inflammatory activity of compounds 3 and 4 is in accord with our prior evaluation of the agents in LPS challenged RAW 264.7 cell cultures in which both agents demonstrated reductions in nitrite and TNF-α at concentrations as low as 100 nM [21] (in that study compounds 3 and 4 are called TFBP and tetrafluoronorbornylphthalimide (TFNBP), respectively [21]). This in vitro activity successfully translated into in vivo anti-inflammatory action in rats challenged with intraperitoneal LPS, a classic preclinical model of systemic and neuroinflammation [48]. Specifically, administration of each compound (at doses equivalent to 12.5 and 25 mg/kg pomalidomide) significantly mitigated proinflammatory markers in plasma and brain, and compound 3 (TFBP) significantly mitigated traumatic brain injury associated neuroinflammation and improved recovery of injury-induced motor coordination and balance impairments [21]. In support of the existence of CRBN-independent anti-inflammatory IMiD pathways [49,50], thalidomide, lenalidomide, and pomalidomide have been demonstrated to mitigate LPS-mediated inflammation in both normal and CRBN knockout mice [49]. Furthermore, the anti-inflammatory actions of IMiDs are retained in an ulcerative colitis model in both normal and humanized CRBN mice [51].
In synopsis, we describe a new series of monoterpenoid-based IMiDs 1–8 that lack binding to human CRBN, the primary drug target of thalidomide, lenalidomide, and pomalidomide that largely accounts for the valuable anticancer and at least some of the adverse teratogenic actions of these clinically used IMiDs [10–17]. Representative bicyclic monoterpenes are not only found in numerous plants and essential oils, but have been increasingly applied in drug development and possess a wide range of reported pharmacological activities, including antibiotic resistance modulation, antimicrobial, anti-Leishmania, antioxidant, anticoagulant, and analgesic effects, in addition to anticancer and anti-inflammatory actions [27,28,52,53]. Tetrafluorination of the phthalimide moiety resulted in compounds 1–4 that possessed promising anti-angiogenic and anti-proliferative (cytotoxic) actions, particularly in lenalidomide resistant U266 R10R MM cells. These compounds additionally proved more potent than their difluorinated equivalents in a cellular anti-inflammatory screen, and separate studies on compounds 3 and 4 have demonstrated that such efficacy successfully translates to in vivo models [21]. Specifically, 3 significantly lowered systemic and brain markers of inflammation in rodents challenged with LPS (a widely used model to screen for anti-inflammatory agents), and mitigated neuroinflammation induced by traumatic brain injury to, thereby, improve recovery [21]. Determination of CNS multiparameter optimization (MPO) scores [54] (Table 1) suggests that compounds 1–4 possess drug-like features (with values > 4.0 [54]). These MPO scores align with those for thalidomide (4.8), lenalidomide (5.4) and pomalidomide (4.8) that remain widely used clinical drugs in cancer aand other disorders [7, 8,55,56]. Whereas the mechanism of action of current clinically available IMiDs is reported to be largerly mediated via CRBN [10–16], the actions of compounds 1–4 clearly must be CRBN-unrelated and proteomic studies are ongoing to define the potential drug targets. In this light, compounds 1–4 not only warrant further pharmacological investigation as potential new drugs to mitigate MM and inflammatory disorders, but also as pharmacological tools to differentiate and characterize CRBN-dependent and -independent pathways of IMiD action.
Supplementary Material
Funding
All authors acknowledge support from their associated institutions which included (i) the Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Aging, NIH, USA (AG 000994). (ii) The Intramural Research Program, National Cancer Institute, NIH, USA (ZIA SC 006538). (iii) Aevis Bio, Inc., the Korea Dementia Research Center (KDRC), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare and Ministry of Science and ICT, Republic of Korea (RS-2024-00341249), the Korea Drug Development Fund funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT, Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy, and Ministry of Health and Welfare, (RS-2024-00338017, Republic of Korea).
Appendix A. Supplementary data
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2025.152428.
Footnotes
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Weiming Luo: Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation. Kathleen M. Garchitorena: Investigation, Data curation. David Tweedie: Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation. Cindy H. Chau: Writing – review & editing, Validation, Formal analysis. Chirag N. Patel: Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Formal analysis. Maxime A. Siegler: Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation. Neil Vargesson: Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Conceptualization. Inho Hwang: Investigation, Data curation. Soyeon Kim: Investigation, Data curation. Dong Seok Kim: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization. William D. Figg: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization. Nigel H. Greig: Writing – original draft, Supervision, Resources, Project administration, Conceptualization.
Consent for publication
All authors have read, approved, and provided their consent for submission of the present manuscript.
Declaration of competing interest
All other authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Availability of data and material
All data and materials are available on reasonable request to the authors.
References
- [1].McBride WG, Thalidomide and congenital abnormalities (letter), Lancet 2 (1961) 1358. [Google Scholar]
- [2].Vargesson N, Stephens T, Thalidomide: history, withdrawal, Renaissance, and safety concerns, Expet Opin. Drug Saf. 20 (12) (2021. Dec) 1455–1457, 10.1080/14740338.2021.1991307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].D’Amato RJ, Loughnan MS, Flynn E, Folkman J, Thalidomide is an inhibitor of angiogenesis, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 91 (1994) 4082–4085, 10.1073/pnas.91.9.4082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Bartlett JB, Dredge K, Dalgleish AG, The evolution of thalidomide and its IMiD derivatives as anticancer agents, Nat. Rev. Cancer 4 (2004) 314–322, 10.1038/nrc1323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Singhal S, Mehta J, Desikan R, Ayers D, Roberson P, Eddlemon P, Munshi N, Anaissie E, Wilson C, Dhodapkar M, Zeddis J, Barlogie B, Antitumor activity of thalidomide in refractory multiple myeloma, N. Engl. J. Med. 341 (21) (1999) 1565–1571, 10.1056/NEJM199911183412102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Siegel RL, Kratzer TB, Giaquinto AN, Sung H, Jemal A, Cancer statistics, CA Cancer J. Clin. 75 (2025) 10–45, 10.3322/caac.21871, 2025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Colley A, Brauns T, Sluder AE, Poznansky MC, Gemechu Y, Immunomodulatory drugs: a promising clinical ally for cancer immunotherapy, Trends Mol. Med. 30 (8) (2024. Aug) 765–780, 10.1016/j.molmed.2024.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Abe Y, Ishida T, Immunomodulatory drugs in the treatment of multiple myeloma, Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol. 49 (8) (2019. Aug 1) 695–702, 10.1093/jjco/hyz083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Kulig P, Milczarek S, Bakinowska E, Szalewska L, Baumert B, Machaliński B, Lenalidomide in multiple myeloma: review of resistance mechanisms, current treatment strategies and future perspectives, Cancers (Basel) 15 (3) (2023. Feb 2) 963, 10.3390/cancers15030963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Ito T, Ando H, Suzuki T, Ogura T, Hotta K, Imamura Y, Yamaguchi Y, Handa H, Identification of a primary target of thalidomide teratogenicity, Science 327 (5971) (2010. Mar 12) 1345–1350, 10.1126/science.1177319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Asatsuma-Okumura T, Ito T, Handa H, Molecular mechanisms of the teratogenic effects of thalidomide, Pharmaceuticals 13 (5) (2020) 95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Chamberlain PP, Cathers BE, Cereblon modulators: low molecular weight inducers of protein degradation, Drug Discov. Today Technol. 31 (2019) 29–34, 10.1016/j.ddtec.2019.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Franks ME, Macpherson GR, Figg WD, Thalidomide, Lancet. 363 (9423) (2004. May 29) 1802–1811, 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16308-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Fraga LR, Reeves J, Mahony C, Erskine L, Vargesson N, Cereblon E3 ligase complex genes are expressed in tissues sensitive to thalidomide in chicken and zebrafish embryos but are unchanged following thalidomide exposure, Dev. Biol. 522 (2025) 156–170, 10.1016/j.ydbio.2025.03.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Zhu YX, Braggio E, Shi CX, Bruins LA, Schmidt JE, Van Wier S, Chang XB, Bjorklund CC, Fonseca R, Bergsagel PL, et al. , Cereblon expression is required for the antimyeloma activity of lenalidomide and pomalidomide, Blood 118 (2011) 4771–4779, 10.1182/blood-2011-05-356063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Gooding S, Ansari-Pour N, Towfic F, Ortiz Estevez M., Chamberlain PP, Tsai KT, Flynt E, Hirst M, Rozelle D, Dhiman P, et al. , Multiple cereblon genetic changes are associated with acquired resistance to lenalidomide or pomalidomide in multiple myeloma, Blood 137 (2021) 232–237, 10.1182/blood.2020007081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Beedie SL, Huang PA, Harris EM, Strope JD, Mahony C, Chau CH, Vargesson N, Figg WD, Role of cereblon in angiogenesis and in mediating the antiangiogenic activity of immunomodulatory drugs, FASEB J. 34 (2020) 11395–11404, 10.1096/fj.201903060RR. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Peach ML, Beedie SL, Chau CH, Collins MK, Markolovic S, Luo W, Tweedie D, Steinebach C, Greig NH, Gütschow M, et al. , Antiangiogenic activity and in silico cereblon binding analysis of novel thalidomide analogs, Molecules 25 (2020) 5683, 10.3390/molecules25235683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Heim C, Maiwald S, Steinebach C, Collins MK, Strope J, Chau CH, Figg WD, Gütschow M, Hartmann MD, On the correlation of cereblon binding, fluorination and antiangiogenic properties of immunomodulatory drugs, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 534 (2021) 67–72, 10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.11.117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Barton BE, Collins MK, Chau CH, Choo-Wosoba H, Venzon DJ, Steinebach C, Garchitorena KM, Shah B, Sarin EL, Gütschow M, Figg WD, Preclinical evaluation of a novel series of polyfluorinated thalidomide analogs in drug-resistant multiple myeloma, Biomolecules 14 (6) (2024. Jun 19) 725, 10.3390/biom14060725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Lecca D, Hsueh SC, Luo W, Tweedie D, Kim DS, Baig AM, Vargesson N, Kim YK, Hwang I, Kim S, Hoffer BJ, Chiang YH, Greig NH, Novel, thalidomide-like, non-cereblon binding drug tetrafluorobornylphthalimide mitigates inflammation and brain injury, J. Biomed. Sci. 30 (2023) 16, 10.1186/s12929-023-00907-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Boichenko I, Bar K, Deiss S, Heim C, Albrecht R, Lupas AN, Hernandez Alvarez B., Hartmann MD, Chemical ligand space of cereblon, ACS Omega 3 (2018) 11163–11171, 10.1021/acsomega.8b00959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Ng SS, Gütschow M, Weiss M, Hauschildt S, Teubert U, Hecker TK, Luzzio FA, Kruger EA, Eger K, Figg WD, Antiangiogenic activity of N-substituted and tetrafluorinated thalidomide analogues, Cancer Res. 63 (12) (2003) 3189–3194. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Heim C, Maiwald S, Steinebach C, Collins MK, Strope J, Chau CH, Figg WD, Gütschow M, Hartmann MD, On the correlation of cereblon binding, fluorination and antiangiogenic properties of immunomodulatory drugs, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 534 (2021) 67–72, 10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.11.117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Sievers J, Voget R, Lu F, Garchitorena KM, Ng YLD, Chau CH, Steinebach C, Figg WD, Krönke J, Gütschow M, Revisiting the antiangiogenic mechanisms of fluorinated thalidomide derivatives, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 110 (2024) 129858, 10.1016/j.bmcl.2024.129858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Capitosti SM, Hansen TP, Brown ML, Thalidomide analogues demonstrate dual inhibition of both angiogenesis and prostate cancer, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 12 (2004) 327–336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].da Silva AC, Lopes PM, de Azevedo MM, Costa DC, Alviano CS, Alviano DS, Biological activities of alpha-pinene and beta-pinene enantiomers, Molecules 17 (2012) 6305–6316, 10.3390/molecules17066305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Salehi B, Upadhyay S, Erdogan Orhan I, Kumar Jugran A, L D, Jayaweera S, Dias DA, Sharopov F, Taheri Y, Martins N, Baghalpour N, Cho WC, Sharifi-Rad J, Therapeutic potential of α- and β-Pinene: a miracle gift of nature, Biomolecules 9 (11) (2019) 738, 10.3390/biom9110738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Sheldrick GM, SHELXL-2018. Program for Crystal Structure Refinement, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- [30].Tweedie D, Luo W, Short RG, Brossi A, Holloway HW, Li Y, Yu QS, Greig NH, A cellular model of inflammation for identifying TNF-Alpha synthesis inhibitors, J. Neurosci. Methods 183 (2) (2009) 182–187, 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.06.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Higgins JJ, Pucilowska J, Lombardi RQ, Rooney JP, A mutation in a novel ATP-Dependent lon protease gene in a kindred with mild mental retardation, Neurology 63 (10) (2004) 1927–1931, 10.1212/01.wnl.0000146196.01316.a2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Yamamoto J, Ito T, Yamaguchi Y, Handa H, Discovery of CRBN as a target of thalidomide: a breakthrough for progress in the development of protein degraders, Chem. Soc. Rev. 51 (15) (2022) 6234–6250, 10.1039/d2cs00116k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Chamberlain PP, Lopez-Girona A, Miller K, Carmel G, Pagarigan B, Chie-Leon B, Rychak E, Corral LG, Ren YJ, Wang M, Riley M, Delker SL, Ito T, Ando H, Mori T, Hirano Y, Handa H, Hakoshima T, Daniel TO, Cathers BE, Structural basis for responsiveness to thalidomide-analog drugs defined by the crystal structure of the human cereblon:DDB1:lenalidomide complex, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 21 (9) (2014) 803–809, 10.1038/nsmb.2874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Giuliani N, Storti P, Bolzoni M, Palma BD, Bonomini S, Angiogenesis and multiple myeloma. Cancer Microenviron 4 (2011) 325–337, 10.1007/s12307-011-0072-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Ribatti D, Vacca A, New Insights in Anti-Angiogenesis in Multiple Myeloma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19 (2018) 2031, 10.3390/ijms19072031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Vargesson N, Hootnick DR, Arterial dysgenesis and limb defects: clinical and experimental examples, Reprod. Toxicol. 70 (2017) 21–29, 10.1016/j.reprotox.2016.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Hootnick DR, Vargesson N, Horton JA, Chomiak J, Embryonic vascular dysgenesis: the origin of proximal femoral focal deficiency, Birth Defects Res 117 (4) (2025) e2465, 10.1002/bdr2.2465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Vargesson N, The teratogenic effects of thalidomide on limbs, Hand Surg Eur 44 (2019) 88–95, 10.1177/1753193418805249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Carmeliet P, Jain RK, Molecular mechanisms and clinical applications of angiogenesis, Nature 473 (7347) (2011) 298–307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Azimi M, Manavi MS, Afshinpour M, Khorram R, Vafadar R, Rezaei-Tazangi F, Arabzadeh D, Arabzadeh S, Ebrahimi N, Aref AR, Emerging immunologic approaches as cancer anti-angiogenic therapies, Clin. Transl. Oncol. (2024), 10.1007/s12094-024-03667-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Therapontos C, Erskine L, Gardner ER, Figg WD, Vargesson N, Thalidomide induces limb defects by preventing angiogenic outgrowth during early limb formation, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106 (2009) 8573–8578, 10.1073/pnas.0901505106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Tufail M, Hu JJ, Liang J, He CY, Wan WD, Huang YQ, Jiang CH, Wu H, Li N, Hallmarks of cancer resistance, iScience 27 (6) (2024) 109979, 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Ge Y, Byun JS, De Luca P, Gueron G, Yabe IM, Sadiq-Ali SG, Figg WD, Quintero J, Haggerty CM, Li QQ, De Siervi A, Gardner K, Combinatorial antileukemic disruption of oxidative homeostasis and mitochondrial stability by the redox reactive thalidomide 2-(2,4-difluoro-phenyl)-4,5,6,7-tetrafluoro-1H-isoindole-1,3(2H)-dione (CPS49) and flavopiridol, Mol. Pharmacol. 74 (3) (2008) 872–883, 10.1124/mol.107.040808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Lecca D, Jung YJ, Scerba MT, Hwang I, Kim YK, Kim S, Modrow S, Tweedie D, Hsueh SC, Liu D, Luo W, Glotfelty E, Li Y, Wang JY, Luo Y, Hoffer BJ, Kim DS, McDevitt RA, Greig NH, Role of chronic neuroinflammation in neuroplasticity and cognitive function: a hypothesis, Alzheimer’s Dement. 18 (11) (2022) 2327–2340, 10.1002/alz.12610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Scerba MT, Tweedie D, Greig NH, 2-(Piperidin-3-yl)phthalimides reduce classical markers of cellular inflammation in LPS-Challenged RAW 264.7 cells and also demonstrate potentially relevant sigma and serotonin receptor affinity in membrane preparations, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 110 (2024) 129885, 10.1016/j.bmcl.2024.129885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].Zhu X, Giordano T, Yu QS, Holloway HW, Perry TA, Lahiri DK, Brossi A, Greig NH, Thiothalidomides: novel isosteric analogues of thalidomide with enhanced TNF-Alpha inhibitory activity, J. Med. Chem. 46 (24) (2003) 5222–5229, 10.1021/jm030152f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Tweedie D, Frankola KA, Luo W, Li Y, Greig NH, Thalidomide analogues suppress lipopolysaccharide-induced synthesis of TNF-α and nitrite, an intermediate of nitric oxide, in a cellular model of inflammation, Open Biochem. J. 5 (2011) 37–44, 10.2174/1874091X01105010037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [48].Seemann S, Zohles F, Lupp A, Comprehensive comparison of three different animal models for systemic inflammation, J. Biomed. Sci. 24 (1) (2017) 60, 10.1186/s12929-017-0370-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [49].Millrine D, Kishimoto T, A brighter side to thalidomide: its potential use in immunological disorders, Trends Mol. Med. 23 (2017) 348–361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [50].Millrine D, Miyata H, Tei M, Dubey P, Nyati K, Nakahama T, Gemechu Y, Ripley B, Kishimoto T, Immunomodulatory drugs inhibit TLR4-induced type-1 interferon production independently of cereblon via suppression of the TRIF/IRF3 pathway, Int. Immunol. 28 (6) (2016) 307–315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [51].Gemechu Y, Millrine D, Hashimoto S, Prakash J, Sanchenkova K, Metwally H, Gyanu P, Kang S, Kishimoto T, Humanized cereblon mice revealed two distinct therapeutic pathways of immunomodulatory drugs, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115 (46) (2018) 11802–11807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [52].Zielińska-Błajet M, Feder-Kubis J, Monoterpenes and their derivatives-recent development in biological and medical applications, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21 (19) (2020) 7078, 10.3390/ijms21197078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [53].Quintans JSS, Shanmugam S, Heimfarth L, Araújo AAS, Almeida JRGDS, Picot L, Quintans-Júnior LJ, Monoterpenes modulating cytokines - a review, Food Chem. Toxicol. 123 (2019) 233–257, 10.1016/j.fct.2018.10.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [54].Wager TT, Hou X, Verhoest PR, Villalobos A, Central nervous system multiparameter optimization desirability: application in drug discovery, ACS Chem. Neurosci. 7 (6) (2016) 767–775, 10.1021/acschemneuro.6b00029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [55].Jung YJ, Tweedie D, Scerba MT, Kim DS, Palmas MF, Pisanu A, Carta AR, Greig NH, Repurposing immunomodulatory imide drugs (IMiDs) in neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders, Front. Neurosci. 15 (2021) 656921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [56].Kopp KO, Greer ME, Glotfelty EJ, Hsueh SC, Tweedie D, Kim DS, Reale M, Vargesson N, Greig NH, A new generation of IMiDs as treatments for neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative disorders, Biomolecules 13 (5) (2023) 747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data and materials are available on reasonable request to the authors.
