Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 May 21.
Published in final edited form as: J Hepatol. 2025 Sep 23;84(3):567–577. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2025.08.042

Table 2. Summary of primary efficacy outcomes in phase III RCTs with non-proportional hazards.

Study Outcome Median follow-up Protocol-defined expected median for the control group Number of events out of total patients Patterns of NPH Log-rank (p value) MaxCombo test (p value) RMST*
Adjuvant therapy following surgery or ablation
IMbrave050 - interim analysis 9 RFS 17.4 months 20 months Treatment arm (33%); active surveillance (40%) Diminishing effects 0.012 0.018 0.026
IMbrave050 - second analysis 11 RFS 35.1 months 20 months 49% of patients in both arms Diminishing effects NR 0.326 0.080
TACE + IT
LEAP-012 - interim analysis 5 PFS 25.6 months 8 months Treatment arm (56%); control arm (63%) Diminishing effects <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
First-line systemic treatment
HIMALAYA - STRIDE final analysis 29 OS 33.2 months 10 months Treatment arm (67%); control arm (75%) Delayed effects 0.003 0.002 0.001
CheckMate 9DW - interim analysis 31 OS 35.2 months 19 months Treatment arm (58%) and control arm (68%) Crossing of hazards 0.018 <0.001 0.030

The MaxCombo test and RMST were assessed. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

FU, follow-up; IT, immunotherapy; NPH, non-proportional hazards; NR, not reported; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; RFS, recurrence-free survival; RMST, restricted mean survival time; STRIDE, durvalumab + tremelimumab; TACE, transarterial chemoembolization.

*

Assessed at the final time point at which more than 10% of patients remained at risk.