Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Apr 28.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2025;71:79–110. doi: 10.1007/7854_2024_461

Table 1.

Advantages and disadvantages of models that engender excessive levels of alcohol consumption

Model Advantages Disadvantages
Continuous free choice
  • Easy to implement

  • Simple method for assessing pro-pensity to voluntarily drink

  • Provides measures of general preference for and consumption of alcohol

  • Extensively used for investigating genetic determinants of alcohol prefer-ence and consumption

  • Difficult to determine whether alcohol consumption results in intoxication (significant elevation in blood alcohol levels)

  • Temporal pattern of alcohol intake is typically not ascertained

  • Limited utility for studies probing mechanisms underlying motivational aspects of drinking

Scheduled limited access
  • Mimics “binge-like” pattern of intake when access is appropriately scheduled

  • Engenders high levels of alcohol consumption

  • Affords opportunity to more accurately correlate intake with resultant blood alcohol levels

  • Enables examination of relation-ship between alcohol intake and mea-sures of intoxication

  • High levels of drinking during limited access conditions may not predict high drinking when access is not restricted

  • Limited utility for studies probing mechanisms underlying motivational aspects of drinking

Scheduled deprivation
  • Models alcohol relapse and crav-ing

  • Can be studied using home-cage drinking and operant self-administration procedures

  • Translational value as repeated cycles of deprivation lead to more robust and durable effect

  • Lack of specificity: Exagger-ated intake following deprivation observed for other rewards (e.g., sucrose)

  • High propensity for alcohol preference/intake may not predict robust expression of alcohol depri-vation effect

  • Increased intake following deprivation periods may be transient

Intermittent access
  • Home-cage drinking procedure easy to implement

  • Escalation of alcohol intake observed in home-cage drinking and operant self-administration procedures

  • Genetic models of high alco-hol preference/intake may limit escalation effect

  • Observation of escalated alco-hol intake highly dependent on vari-ous biological and experimental factors (e.g., age, sex, housing conditions)

Schedule-induced polydipsia
  • Leads to high levels of intake that can result in alcohol dependence (evidenced by withdrawal signs)

  • Effectively used in nonhuman primates to produce long-lasting ele-vated alcohol intake

  • Lack of specificity: same pro-cedure leads to excessive intake of any fluid (including water)

  • Requires food deprivation, clouding interpretation of motivation

  • Once schedule is relaxed, alcohol intake reverts to control levels (in rodent models)

Alcohol dependence and withdrawal
  • Leads to escalation of voluntary intake that results in significant elevated blood and brain alcohol levels

  • Can be employed to study both physical signs of withdrawal and moti-vational factors that influence alcohol consumption

  • Escalation of alcohol intake observed in home-cage drinking and operant self-administration procedures

  • Increased intake is specific to alcohol (consumption of other palatable substances not altered)

  • Requires unique setup for delivery of alcohol vapor

  • Induction of alcohol depen-dence involves experimenter-administered alcohol

  • Some unique methodological issues need to be considered in studies involving rats vs. mice