Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Apr 10.
Published in final edited form as: Prog Biomed Eng (Bristol). 2025 Aug 14;7(4):10.1088/2516-1091/adf7ee. doi: 10.1088/2516-1091/adf7ee

Enhancing Peripheral Nerve Regeneration with Rehabilitation and Biomaterial-Driven Drug Delivery Strategies

Yunfan Kong 1,2, Tianshu Pan 1,2, Mitchell Kuss 1,2, Kai Yang 3, Johnson V John 4,*, Bin Duan 1,2,3,5,*
PMCID: PMC13063242  NIHMSID: NIHMS2159390  PMID: 40763793

Abstract

Peripheral nerve injury (PNI) is a common problem worldwide. PNI can lead to loss of sensory and motor functions, chronic neuropathic pain, and mental health issues, significantly impacting the patients’ quality of life. Recent studies revealed that, beyond the topical injury site at peripheral nerves, PNIs can also induce dysfunctions in the central nervous system (CNS) by causing maladaptive plasticity, which will result in exaggeration and exacerbation of the pathological condition caused by the primary injuries. The typical therapy strategies for traumatic PNI treatment are using sutures, nerve autografts, or conduits in cases requiring surgical intervention as well as applying physical-based rehabilitation to facilitate functional recovery. However, the functional restoration is generally unsatisfactory due to insufficient regeneration and long-lasting maladaptive neuroplasticity in the nervous system. In this review, we summarized various neurotrophic factors and neuroprotective agents that have been extensively studied as adjuvant therapies to enhance recovery efficiency after PNIs in the last two decades. Particularly, with the rapid development of biomaterials and bioengineering, controllable drug delivery techniques have shown great potential to maintain the drug bioactivity and, consequently, prolonging the therapeutic effects. Additionally, we explored the virus-based gene delivery technique, which has been used to transduce neural cells for enhancing nerve regeneration. Finally, we discussed current challenges, including inadequate motor function restoration, poorly defined rehabilitation protocols, unresolved chronic inflammation, and limited understanding of macrophage dynamics. We also offered perspectives on integrating various approaches to develop effective and comprehensive treatment strategies for PNIs.

Keywords: Peripheral nerve regeneration, neuropathic pain, control release, physical therapy

1. INTRODUCTION

Peripheral nerve injuries (PNIs) are a major health problem that affects more than 1 million people per year worldwide [1, 2]. Particularly, over 20,000 Americans are affected by trauma-related PNIs annually, making up 1% - 5% of total traumatic incidences [3–5]. Traumatic PNIs usually occur in the upper limbs and result from a variety of causes, including stabbing, direct trauma, motor vehicle accidents, and so on [4]. Although PNIs usually do not cause fatalities in patients, they often result in sensorimotor function deficits, chronic neuropathic pain (NP), and even psychological disorders and mental illness, thus negatively affecting patients’ quality of life.

1.1. Classification of PNI

Nerve traction or stretching injury can occur during severe movements. Though the nerve fibers have inherent elasticity due to the abundance of elastin and collagen, over-stretching of peripheral nerves usually disrupts the nerve-blood barrier and results in axonal disconnection, and may even cause complete loss of continuity in severity, such as in a brachial plexus avulsion [6, 7]. Nerve compression is another common trauma-related PNI. Depending on the duration of the injuries, the compressive neuropathies can be either acute or chronic [8]. Acute nerve compression can be caused by traumatic crush injuries and requires from weeks to years for complete recovery [9]. In comparison, chronic compression, such as carpal tunnel syndrome, has more complex etiologies and typically involves the entrapment of nerves, leading to gradually deteriorating symptoms in the absence of appropriate intervention [10]. Other than traction and compression, nerve lacerations or transections are more serious cases [11]. Laceration injuries can be classified as either sharp, which are generally caused by cuts from knives or glass, or blunt, which can involve nerve avulsion, severe contamination, and soft tissue injury, resulting in partial or complete nerve discontinuity.

Depending on the damage severity of nerve injuries, Seddon and Sunderland described 3 broad categories and 5 grades of nerve injury [12, 13]. Neuropraxia and Sunderland grade I injuries are the mildest forms of traumatic PNIs, in which injuries cause a transient conduction block and mild myelin disruption while the axonal structure is intact. Axonotmesis indicates disconnected axons but with intact surrounding connective tissue. The extent of the damage to axons, endoneurium, and perineurium is denoted as Sunderland grade II, III, and IV injuries, respectively. Based on the degree of nerve tissue discontinuity, recovery from the injuries can be complete or incomplete and may require proper surgical intervention. Neurotmesis corresponds to Sunderland grade V injuries, which are the most severe form of nerve injuries, indicating complete disruption of the nerve. Nerve regeneration after these injuries is almost impossible, and clinical outcomes are poor. Sunderland III/IV injuries also generally have poor recovery without surgical intervention.

Overall, the Seddon–Sunderland scale shows that each extra layer of damaged tissue including axon, endoneurium, perineurium and epineurium makes conduction block last longer, raises the risk of neuroma, and shortens the therapeutic window. This means that early, grade-specific triage to conservative care or microsurgical reconstruction is important for the treatment outcome.

1.2. Wallerian degeneration and nerve regeneration

Neural responses following axon damage, including Wallerian degeneration and axon regeneration, have been well and extensively summarized in reviews [1, 14–18]. Briefly, a rapid breakdown of disconnected axons and myelin occurs distal to the injury site within 24–48 hours following the PNI [16]. Meanwhile, mature Schwann cells (SCs) transdifferentiate into active repair SCs, which coordinate with recruited immune cells to phagocytose axonal and myelin debris [15]. Repair SCs can further proliferate and line up in the remaining endoneurial tubes to form bands of Büngner, which contribute to both structural and trophic support for axon regeneration. When axons elongate along the bands of Büngner, the interaction between SCs and regrown axons induces redifferentiation into myelinating SCs, eventually leading to the formation of the myelin structure, known as the process of remyelination [15].

1.2.1. Neurotrophic factors (NTFs) during axon regeneration:

PNIs can cause an up-regulated expression of a plethora of NTFs, including nerve growth factor (NGF), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), neurotrophin 3 (NT3), and glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), which are critical in supporting neuron survival and nerve regeneration following the injuries [19–21]. SC-derived endogenous NTFs have been the most extensively studied, however, other cell types in the injured nerves also contribute to the expression of NTFs, such as sensory neurons (SNs) [22] and macrophages [23]. Denervated SCs produce NTFs until they are reinnervated with regenerating axons. Consequently, active SCs located at a denervated area that is distal to the regenerative axon stump can generate a relatively higher level of NTFs, promoting axonal growth in a proper direction towards the target tissue [24]. However, chronic denervation can gradually weaken the pro-regenerative activity of SCs and eventually results in SC atrophy over months, which accounts for poor clinical outcomes in severe neurotmesis injuries and with delayed repair [25, 26]. Specifically, NGF can maintain neuronal survival and promote axonal growth of nociceptor neurons by binding to TrkA and thereby activating pro-regenerative signaling cascades such as Ras-mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK), extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) -Akt, and phospholipase C (PLC) -γ [27–29]. BDNF can also be increasingly expressed following PNIs and mainly acts on TrkB receptors on motor neurons, thus promoting motor neuron axonal regeneration [30]. In addition, as a subpopulation of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) also expresses TrkB receptors, BDNF has also been suggested to activate initial neurite growth in these SNs [31, 32]. NT-3 can act on TrkA and TrkB receptors, and TrkC receptors with the highest affinity, and it is essential for most SN development, especially in TrkC-positive proprioceptive neurons [33–35]. Though the NT-3 content in the nerve does not increase following PNIs, NT-3 is critical in supporting the survival of SCs and maintaining their activity after chronic denervation [36–38]. In contrast to their neuroprotective and pro-regenerative effects, high contents of NGF, BDNF, and NT-3 can also inhibit axon regeneration since they have low binding affinities to a pan neurotrophin receptor p75NTR, which activates Jun N-terminal (JNK) kinases-mediated neuronal apoptosis [39]. GDNF is another common trophic factor that is upregulated in the nerve and skeletal muscle in response to PNIs [40]. GDNF signals through the glycosylphosphatidylinositol-linked GDNF receptor and tyrosine kinase rearranged during transfection receptor. It mediates the regeneration of both motor neurons and SNs, the proliferation and myelination of SCs, and reinnervation at the neuromuscular junction [41–44].

1.2.2. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) during nerve regeneration:

PNIs also cause an elevation of ROS, a group of highly reactive molecules derived from the reduction of oxygen (e.g., superoxide and hydrogen peroxide) at the injured nerve, which is critical in the process of Wallerian degeneration [45, 46]. ROS are produced mainly through enzymatic activity, such as the NADPH-oxidase family of proteins in phagocytic cells and aerobic metabolism of mitochondria during regular cell activity [47]. In normal conditions, intracellular redox homeostasis is maintained by the antioxidant defense system, whereas, upon injury, injury-induced dysfunction of mitochondrial and pro-inflammatory reactions generate excessive ROS that exceed the scavenging capacity of the antioxidant system, resulting in oxidative stress. ROS have been well known for their detrimental effects of directly oxidizing lipids, proteins, and DNA in cells, thereby exacerbating the pathological process [48–50]. Moreover, the nervous system is especially vulnerable to ROS due to modest antioxidant defense mechanisms in neurons and an abundance of unsaturated lipids on the cell membrane and myelin structure [51]. ROS can also function as a signal mediator in extensive signaling networks that are involved in cell growth, differentiation, progression, and death [52]. Particularly, ROS can activate the epidermal growth factor receptor - E3 ubiquitin ligase zinc and ring finger 1 signaling cascade, leading to neuronal cell death and axonal degeneration [53–55]. Therefore, excessive ROS and prolonged oxidative stress can cause secondary damage to the injured nerves in addition to the primary physical deformation. In contrast to the hostile role of ROS after PNIs, recent studies also propose their beneficial influence in regulating peripheral nerve regeneration. ROS generated in an injured neuron or through exosomal transfer from the recruited macrophages support axon growth, SC activity, and neuromuscular junction formation. ROS expressed in keratinocytes also induces cutaneous sensory axon regeneration [56–58]. The timeline of ROS generation will determine whether it will limit secondary damage or disrupt pro-regenerative signaling. Within seconds–minutes after PNI axonal transection, Ca2+ influx and mitochondrial permeability-transition at the injury site will trigger a transient burst of superoxide and H2O2 [59]. From 6 h to 24h, infiltrating neutrophils and NADPH-oxidase-positive macrophages generate a sustained sub-acute wave that coincides with myelin debris clearance and Wallerian degeneration [60]. In the following 1–8 weeks, mitochondrial ROS will be generated by the active Schwann cells and regenerating axons [61, 62]. Then ROS levels gradually decline as antioxidant enzymes like catalase and GPx increase during the later process of recovery [63, 64]. Overall, the acute mitochondrial ROS burst followed by immune cell activation wave and a chronic Schwann/axon oxidation act like a double-edged sword. The timing of redox modulation will determine whether it will limit secondary damage or disrupt pro-regenerative signaling.

1.3. PNI-induced neuropathic pain

A lesion or disease of the somatosensory nervous system can result in neuropathic pain. More than half of patients who went through surgery or with peripheral nerve trauma suffer from chronic neuropathic pain. Neuropathic pain can be evoked pain and spontaneous pain, often manifesting as ongoing burning, shooting, stabbing, or freezing pain. Upon mechanical or thermal stimulation, patients with PNIs may have allodynia, pain due to a stimulus that does not normally provoke pain, or hyperalgesia, which is increased pain from a stimulus that normally provokes pain. The PNI-induced neuropathic pain stems from a series of hypersensitive changes in the afferent pathway of nociception, including ectopic discharge from the injured nerve, increased excitability of SNs, loss of inhibitory regulation in the dorsal horn, and maladaptive changes in descending inhibitory inputs to spinal nociceptive circuitry [65, 66]. Neuroimmune interactions and injury-induced oxidative environments are essential for pain generation, as well as affecting pain perception, intensity, and persistence. The roles of general inflammation and ROS in pain mechanisms involving the peripheral nerves, spinal cord, and brain are summarized in Fig. 1. Besides neuropathic pain, a complete transection of nerves in events like amputation also produces phantom limb pain, which is a different type of pain and can occur in up to 80% of cases.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Schematic of inflammation and ROS in pain mechanisms in peripheral nerves, spinal cord, Tand brain. Damaged axons and myelin in peripheral nerves undergo Wallerian degeneration. Schwann cells transition into repair phenotypes. Inflammatory cells (mast cells, neutrophils, macrophages, and T cells) are recruited and release cytokines like IL-1β, tumor-necrosis factor (TNF), IL-6, and chemokines like chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2) near the injury site. This leads to elevated ROS production in damaged DRG neurons and hypersensitivity and pain signals ascending toward the spinal cord by affecting ion channels (Nav1.7, Nav1.8, Nav1.9, TRPV1, and TRPA1). DRG neurons release colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF-1), CCL-2, and fractalkine (CX3CL1), which activate microglia and astrocytes. The inflammatory mediators produced promote the presynaptic release of glutamate and inhibit GABAergic signals of GABA and Glycine. Enhanced excitatory signals within the SDH are then transmitted to IC, PFC, S1, S2, ACC, and CTX through the Thalamus, which leads to an impaired periaqueductal Gray (PAG)-rostroventromedial medulla (RVM)-superficial dorsal horn (SDH) descending pain inhibition pathway. CTX: cerebral cortex; IC: insular cortex; PFC: prefrontal cortex; ACC: anterior cingulate cortex; S1/S2: primary/secondary somatosensory cortex; PAG: periaqueductal gray; RVM: rostral ventromedial medulla; SDH: superficial dorsal horn; DRG: dorsal root ganglion; ROS: reactive oxygen species; TNF: tumor-necrosis factor; IL-1β: interleukin-1 beta; GABA: γ-aminobutyric acid; TRPV1: transient receptor-potential vanilloid 1; TRPA1: transient receptor-potential ankyrin 1; Nav1.7: voltage-gated sodium channel 1.7; Nav1.8: voltage-gated sodium channel 1.8; Nav1.9: voltage-gated sodium channel 1.9.

1.3.1. Inflammation and ROS in peripheral nerve for neuropathic pain:

Following PNIs, the SCs, resident mast cells, recruited neutrophils, T lymphocytes, and macrophages regulate local phagocytotic activity at injured nerves. This happens through the production of inflammatory mediators, including various growth factors, prostanoids, histamine, and numerous types of cytokines [67]. In the DRG, injured SNs express colony stimulating factor 1 (CSF-1) and C-C Motif Chemokine Ligand 2 (CCL-2), and the DRG resident macrophages receive these injury signals and become proliferative, which may support axonal regeneration [68–70]. However, long-lasting pro-inflammatory milieu can promote hypersensitive plastic changes in SNs. Voltage-gated sodium channels are enriched in nociceptors. They are critical in determining neuronal excitability, and Nav1.7, Nav1.8, and Nav1.9 are associated with increased pain in neuropathies [71, 72]. Many cytokines can affect the activity of these ion channels and thereby cause a lower threshold for excitation and spontaneous firing of action potentials. For example, chronic interleukin (IL)-1β exposure potentiates Nav1.8 and Nav1.9 through a p38 MAPK-dependent process[73–75]. TNF exposure can rapidly increase nociceptive excitability through p38 MAPK-mediated activation of Nav1.8 and Nav1.9 [76, 77]. Transient receptor potential (TRP) ion channels are ligand-gated ion channels expressed on the sensory nerve which function as transducers for noxious physical, chemical, and thermal stimuli [78]. Cytokines, such as TNF and IL-6, upregulate the expression of TRP vanilloid (TRPV) channel 1, a detector for capsaicin, noxious heat, and acidic stimulation, and TRP ankyrin (TRPA) channel 1, a sensor for heat and cold temperatures, by directly acting on their receptors or through indirect action by inducing prostaglandin production [75, 79–82]. Chemokines, such as CCL2, can not only promote infiltration of immune cells but also directly act on its receptors expressed on SNs, thus leading to increased Nav1.8 sodium channel activity and upregulation of TRPV1 [83]. The oxidative stress caused by the overexpression of ROS following PNIs has also been considered as an independent cause to promote neuropathic pain as inactivation of antioxidant enzymes exaggerated pain behaviors [84, 85]. ROS can behave as direct TRPA1 activators [86], and meanwhile, products of phospholipid oxidation also activate TRPA1 [87]. Consequently, this leads to pain and sensitization of SNs. In addition, ROS can function as signaling messengers to activate cyclic guanosine monophosphate-dependent protein kinase Iα in DRG neurons, which is involved in pain detection and transduction, thus contributing to neuropathic pain processing [88].

1.3.2. Inflammation and ROS in the spinal cord for neuropathic pain:

Hyperactivity of SNs in the DRG following PNIs also increases the release of neuromodulators from the central terminals in the spinal dorsal horn (SDH), further leading to inflammatory responses in the central nervous system (CNS). CCL-2 can increase the permeability of the blood-spinal cord barrier and contribute to the infiltration of macrophages into the spinal cord [89]. Moreover, activation of residential glial cells, including microglia and astrocytes, in the spinal cord has been considered important in central inflammation and sensitization in PNI-induced chronic pain. Microglia are residents of the CNS that act to survey the local environment in normal physiological conditions, while astrocytes contribute to maintaining extracellular homeostasis and modulating synaptic function. A release of CSF-1, CCL-2, and CX3CL1 from DRG neurons can facilitate the activation of microglia [90–92], and the microglia can further crosstalk with astrocytes to induce astrogliosis [93]. Reactive microglia and astrocytes can produce pro-inflammatory mediators as well as neuromodulators, such as TNF, IL-1β, IL-6, CCL-2, and BDNF. This promotes glutamate-mediated excitatory currents and reduces the inhibition of GABAergic and glycinergic synaptic transmission in the spinal cord nociceptive circuitry, thus contributing to the generation and maintenance of chronic pain [94, 95]. Accumulating evidence also suggests a critical role of ROS in the spinal cord in the processing of pathological pain, although the mechanism needs to be further explored [96]. Following PNIs, SDH neurons showed increased expression of mitochondrial superoxide, and microglia highly produced NADPH oxidase 2-derived ROS [97–99]. The induction of oxidative stress in the spinal cord may sustain glial activity and enhance the excitatory synaptic strength and, thereby, contribute to the PNI-induced NP.

1.3.3. PNI-induced neuroplastic changes in the brain and spinal cord:

Pain information processed in the SDH is further ascendingly transduced by second-order neurons through various tracts, predominantly the spinothalamic tract, while third-order neurons in the thalamus relay signals to different brain regions [100]. The somatosensory cortex (S1, S2), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), prefrontal cortex (PFC), insular cortex (IC), amygdala, thalamus, cerebellum, and periaqueductal grey (PAG) have been commonly thought to receive, process and transcode the pain signals. In addition to the perception of the discriminative sensory features (e.g., quality, location, and duration) of pain, as pain is a multidimensional and usually unpleasant sensation, brain regions, such as PFC, IC, ACC, and amygdala also regulate the cognition, motivation, and emotion of pain, affecting the pain experience [101]. PNI-induced spontaneous and ectopic inputs of nociceptive signals can chronically activate these pain-associated regions in the supraspinal level, and chronic pain is usually associated with functional and structural changes in the brain [102]. For instance, both patients and animal models with chronic pain following PNIs showed decreased volumes in the S1, S2, cingulate cortex (CC), and IC [103–105]. Neurologically, the thalamus, as a signal relay station, showed an increased expression of voltage-gated sodium and calcium channels as well as a decreased expression of GABAergic receptors in thalamic neurons during chronic pain [106–108]. The hyperexcitability of thalamic neurons can strengthen the signal inputs to the cerebral cortex (CTX). Consistently, patients with chronic pain showed increased neural activity in response to mechanical stimulation [109], which could be associated with hyperactivity of S1 pyramidal neurons and an inhibition of GABAergic interneurons [110]. The ACC receives pain information from the thalamus and the S1 with output projections to the PAG. PNIs can facilitate glutamatergic transmitter release in ACC pyramidal neurons and induce long-term potential of chronic pain by exhibiting increased amplitudes of evoked excitatory postsynaptic currents [111]. These maladaptive changes in the CTX can exaggerate pain, cause behavioral deficits, and induce pain-associated emotional disorders. Furthermore, afferent pain transduction in the spinal dorsal horn can also be modulated through top-down descending pathways. The PAG- RVM-SDH pathway has been the most studied. It can exert both pain inhibition and facilitation via descending noradrenergic and serotonergic regulation [112]. PNIs can also change the physiological and neurological conditions in the PAG by inducing glial activation and affecting glutamatergic neurotransmission [113, 114]. Emerging evidence implicates that the imbalance of descending inhibitory and facilitatory modulation of pain contributes to sustained neuropathic pain [115, 116].

2. Current clinical and preclinical therapies for enhancing PNI recovery

In this study, we searched literature in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science utilizing keywords like peripheral nerve injury, nerve regeneration and biomaterials. We included papers published between 2005 to 2024 that involved preclinical trials, clinical trials and translational studies that demonstrated therapeutic efficacy or provided mechanism explanation. These studies were selected based on their scientific rigor, novelty, relevance to peripheral nerve repair and functional recovery.

Management for PNIs is dependent on the severity of the injury. Neuropraxia and Sunderland grade I injuries heal relatively quickly, and conservative nonsurgical treatments, such as physical therapy, are usually recommended to improve functional recovery. However, it should not be neglected that, in cases with chronic nerve entrapment and compression and those presenting with exacerbated symptoms, surgical intervention may be required to release the nerve from the surrounding soft tissue [117]. Surgery can cause complications, including secondary nerve injury, neuroma formation, hematomas, pain syndrome, and so on [118], and a recurrence or persistence of symptoms may happen after the surgery [119]. For severe axonotmesis and neurotmesis, open surgery is generally required. Direct end-to-end coaptation of damaged nerves, also known as neurorrhaphy, based on either microsutures or fibrin glue, is the most commonly used method in cases with short deficits [120]. In cases with large nerve gaps, when the tensionless neurorrhaphy is not possible, interposition of an autologous nerve graft is the current gold standard. Nerve autografts can provide an appropriate microstructure to direct nerve regeneration and have a lower risk of neuroma formation and antigenic reaction [121]. However, a second or more surgical procedures are required to extract a nerve autograft that has a sufficient length and matches the diameter. Moreover, patients will permanently lose sensory functions at their donor sites. These problems have led to extensive investigations into fabricating and applying nerve guidance scaffolds and conduits that are designed to mimic the natural nerve structure to support directional nerve growth and prevent scar formation. Besides nerve autografts, studies have shown that process nerve grafts (cadaveric grafts such as Axogen nerve grafts) can have similar outcomes as nerve autografts without the donor site morbidities. Current commercially available nerve conduits are made with either collagen or synthetic polymers, such as polyglycolic acid, polylactic acid (PLA), or poly lactide-co-glycolide acid (PLGA) [122]. Nevertheless, although they can perform with a comparable repair efficiency in short nerve gaps (<2 mm), while longer nerve gaps led to poor functional outcomes [123]. Current research strategies mainly use physical intervention, such as rehabilitation- or electrical stimulation-based therapy and pharmacological treatments, to facilitate nerve elongation while preventing inflammation and scar formation. Conduits in general have shown to be less effective than nerve grafts

2.1. Physical therapy

Physical activity is a conservative and affordable method that has been widely used in clinic to improve functional recovery for diseases of the nervous system [124]. In respect to PNIs, for example, patients with Carpel Tunnel Syndrome reported reduced pain and improved functions by doing nerve gliding exercises that may help them avoid surgical intervention [125]. Rehabilitation, including range of motion stretching exercises, hydrotherapy, or resistance training exercises, showed beneficial effects in patients with traumatic brachial plexus injuries to improve overall recovery [126, 127]. Consistent with the clinical outcomes, considerable research also reported that varied types of exercise, either passive or active, improved nerve regeneration, functional recovery, and relieved pain in animals following traumatic PNIs [128]. The influence of exercise can be affected by the time before beginning training after the injuries, the pattern of exercise (i.e., intensity and duration), and even sex differences [129–132]. For example, Kong et al. demonstrated that running on a treadmill at a low intensity and a late initiation effectively facilitated nerve regeneration in a rat model with a long-gap sciatic nerve injury and autograft implantation [133]. Apart from the assessment of the sciatic nerve and muscles, in vivo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) were performed in this study to investigate structural and metabolite changes in the brain at 16 weeks post-injury, as described in the overall experimental design and timeline schematic in Fig. 2A. Rats was transected with a10 mm-long sciatic nerve segment which was inverted and orthotopically transplanted by an end-to-end coaptation at week 0 and underwent behavior tests (e.g. von Frey and Hargreaves tests) every week until week 16 for evaluating their sensory function after injury (Fig. 2A). They started receiving low-intensity treadmill treatment and gait-based assays for testing locomotor function at week 10 after the injury, when meaningful paw placement results typically re-emerges due to early re-innervation and initial axonal bridging around that time (Fig. 2A). The results confirmed that the PNI induced the volumetric, microstructural, metabolite, and neuronal activity changes in supraspinal regions of interest (i.e., somatosensory cortex, motor cortex [MC], hippocampus, etc.) after the injury and autograft implantation [133]. For example, manganese-enhanced MRI (MEMRI), which utilizes Mn2+ transport into excitable nervous system cells via voltage-gated Ca2+ channels to detect neural activity, could reveal the T1 signal in various brain regions, with stronger signals (darker red color) reflecting higher neural activity (Fig. 2B). Further semi-quantitative analysis of the ROIs results in Fig. 2B showed that the T1 signal intensities were significantly increased in the primary somatosensory cortex of the hind limbs (S1HL), MC, and CC, while a decrease was observed in the periaqueductal gray (PAG) region following nerve injury (Fig. 2C). This indicates that neural activity was altered in these regions following PNI. The treadmill exercise could effectively reverse some of these changes.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Treadmill exercise facilitates regeneration after a long-gap sciatic nerve injury and autograft implantation and further modulates neural plasticity [133]. (A) Schematic of the long-gap sciatic nerve transection, autograft repair, treadmill running paradigm, and experimental design. (B, C) Neuronal activity in the brain after the long-gap PNI and treadmill exercise measured by T1-weighted MEMRI. (B) Region of interest (ROI) analysis of the rat brain. ROIs were defined based on rat brain templates and atlases; Color map of averaged T1-weighted images from each group. The colored bar indicates the normalized signal intensity; (C) Overall neuronal activity of ROIs in the brain based on T1-weighted signals. (n = 4 or 5, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001).

In clinical applications, it has been shown that physical therapies significantly enhanced sensory recovery and alleviated discomfort in patients with mild to median nerve injury [134]. Dr. Ballestero-Pérez has reported that patients with carpal tunnel syndrome showed significantly enhanced sensory test results and reduced pain intensity after nerve gliding and stretching exercises [135]. Similarly, patients with traumatic brachial plexus injury improved in shoulder abduction and elbow flexion after motion exercises and resistance training protocols [136]. For chronic compressive neuropathies, conservative rehabilitation protocols (gym- based exercise and muscle strength) have been proved to postpone or prevent the necessity for surgical decompression [137]. Recent studies have also demonstrated that patients with peripheral nerve damage were markedly reduced in injury-induced neuronal hyperexcitability by treadmill exercise [138].

Electrical stimulation (EStim), as another option that was frequently integrated into PNI surgical repair clinical protocols, showed evidence for its ability for enhancing axonal outgrowth and neuromuscular junction reformation [139]. Patients with digital nerve transection were improved in sensory recovery after receiving low-frequency Estim [140]. It has also been shown that non-invasive transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation is capable in mitigating allodynia in patients with post-surgical PNI [141]. Ahn et al. recently used a fully bioresorbable dual-site stimulator which delivers therapeutic electrical bursts to both proximal and distal sciatic-nerve stumps for a week that markedly accelerated axonal bridging and functional recovery in rats [142]. A piezoelectric spiral conduit has also recently demonstrated to provide self-powered bursts that speeded axonal bridging in 15-mm rat gaps [143].

Underlying mechanisms in the neuro-protective and regenerative effects of physical activities converge on the modulation of neurotrophin expression [144]. Expression of BDNF and GDNF have been reported to be increased after exercise in both muscles and nerves following nerve transection and repair, which may be critical for the maintenance of SC activity, axonal elongation, and reinnervation [145]. However, the same NTFs are also pro-nociceptive, and their expressions are induced by PNIs, which can increase the excitability of SNs and maladaptive plasticity, thus exacerbating symptoms of pain [146]. In accordance with the analgesic effects of physical activity, treadmill running can reduce the expression of pro-nociceptive NTFs, including NGF and BDNF in the DRG [147, 148]. Moreover, physical exercise can further modulate central inflammation and plasticity in the CNS. Short-term treadmill running reduced microglia and astrocyte activation and the expression of BDNF in lumbar spinal cord [149, 150]. Increasing-intensity treadmill exercise can also regulate the PAG-RVM descending pathway by enhancing the activity of serotonergic and noradrenergic inhibition to reduce nerve transection-induced pain [151].

Patients with severe PNIs commonly suffer from impaired mobility and are incapable of performing many rehabilitation exercises. Besides, the recovery efficacy of exercise at a late stage, when patients may regain some motor functions, will be poor. In comparison, EStim -based therapy can be applied to the majority of patients. There are several clinical reports about the application of 1 hour of 20 Hz EStim following surgery in patients with cubital tunnel syndrome [152], carpal tunnel syndrome [153], or complete digital nerve transection [154]. Patients who received the EStim showed reduced pain, better muscle reinnervation, and improved sensorimotor functions. Recently, EStim therapy for peripheral neuropathy has gained much attention in preclinical studies, and has been reported to accelerate nerve regeneration, facilitate reinnervation, prevent muscle atrophy, improve functional recovery, and alleviate pain [155]. EStim is commonly applied at the injury site and terminal target organs, including muscle and skin, and can also be induced in DRG and the spinal cord. EStim applied at injured sites can induce the expression of NTFs, such as NGF, BDNF, and GDNF, in DRGs and nerves [148, 156, 157]. EStim can also increase SC activity by changing intracellular Ca2+ concentrations to promote the secretion of SC exosomes that contain pro-regenerative molecules [157]. EStim applied to the muscle increased intramuscular expression of BDNF and GDNF, which are critical in maintaining the activity of muscle stem cells and satellite cells as well as facilitating the formation of neuromuscular junctions [158, 159]. Transcutaneous EStim is commonly used to treat neuropathic pain, which can be achieved by modulating the RVM-mediated descending pain inhibition pathway to increase serotonin and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in the spinal cord [160–163]. Spinal cord stimulation has been clinically used in patients with chronic pain or a spinal cord injury [164]. In animal models with PNIs, spinal cord stimulation can support nerve regeneration by protecting SNs in DRGs as well as motor neurons in the spinal cord [165] and can also attenuate neuropathic pain through reducing neuroinflammation in both DRGs and the spinal cord [166, 167].

Overall, physical therapy has shown promising efficacy in the treatment with PNIs in both preclinical studies and clinical usage. However, their mechanisms for observed improvements in PNI recovery are still largely unknown, especially with respect to maladaptive plasticity CNS. Moreover, local EStim on injured nerves or muscles requires implantation of electrodes, which is expensive and can induce many complications, such as inflammation and wound dehiscence [155]. On the other hand, the effects of rehabilitation exercise are still under debate. It has also been reported that overly intense exercise is excitotoxic, which can lead to neuronal hyperexcitability and induction of pain [168, 169]. Therefore, more studies are needed to accurately evaluate the effects of different exercise regimens (e.g., starting time, interval, duration, intensity) on PNI recovery.

Neuromodulatory techniques like transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) have also shown increasing promise in managing inflammation [170]. As a non-invasive method, taVNS acts through stimulates the auricular branch of the vagus nerve through the skin of the outer ear and modulates the activity of the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway. Studies have demonstrated that taVNS could reduce systemic inflammatory marker expression in clinical models of subarachnoid hemorrhage, rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn’s disease [171–173]. Although taVNS has not been widely studied in PNI models particularly, its success in these neuroinflammatory diseases in anti-inflammation may suggest its translational potential for PNI treatment.

For clinical studies, low-load nerve-gliding and range-of-motion programs are used for relieving entrapment neuropathies and mild traction injuries. The rehabilitation programs, including hydrotherapy, resistance training and treadmill walking, are recommended after microsurgical repair to accelerate sensorimotor return and curb central sensitization. For the device-based modalities deliver targeted currents or fields, low-frequency intra-operative or early post-operative ES primes axonal outgrowth and re-innervation. Transcutaneous ES or spinal-cord stimulation mitigates chronic allodynia. And emerging non-invasive techniques like taVNS extend the anti-inflammatory reach beyond the lesioned limb. For preclinical studies, low-intensity treadmill running in long-gap autograft models amplifies neurotrophin waves and also normalizes supraspinal activity maps, whereas precisely dosed ES or magnetic stimulation could boost Schwann cell exosome release, which preserves neuromuscular junctions and inhibit DRG as well as spinal neuro-inflammation.

In summary, although exercise or stimulation-based rehabilitation consistently enhances neurotrophic signaling and functional recovery, its clinical impact ultimately depends on tailoring timing, intensity and patient adherence of the therapies, which highlights the need for clarifying the mechanistic pathways behind the physical therapies.

2.2. Pharmacological-based treatments

Although currently there are no clinically available pharmacological treatments for nerve regeneration, extensive studies have reported promising potentials of various neurotrophic and growth factors as well as functional small molecules, such as anti-inflammatory and antioxidant compounds, for PNI recovery. Exogenous neurotrophic and growth factors, such as NGF, BDNF, ciliary neurotrophic factor, and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), have be locally delivered to injured nerves through osmotic pumps [174–178] or embedding them in nerve grafts [19, 179]. As each NTF has a unique mechanism for affecting nerve regeneration, administration of a single NTF may not be sufficient to achieve overall improvement. Hence, combined delivery of multiple NTFs or with other therapeutic agents would be more efficacious [180–183]. However, NTFs undergo proteolytic degradation and rapid clearance in the body, and therefore, continuous administration of neurotrophic factors is required to achieve adequate concentration. This limitation severely hinders their application in clinical medicine. In addition, too high of a concentration of NTFs and an inappropriate administration time may entrap regenerating axons and inhibit their further growth [184, 185].

Many anti-inflammatory compounds and antioxidant agents have gained increased attention for treating peripheral neuropathy, particularly induced by chemotherapy or diabetes [186, 187]. It has also been reported that these neuroprotective agents reduced PNI-induced pain and improved functional recovery [188]. For instance, a potent anti-inflammatory compound, minocycline, can decrease perineural inflammation and reduce scar formation around injured sciatic nerves, thus preventing nerve adhesion and attenuating the pain [189, 190]. An antioxidant agent, alpha lipoic acid, has been exhibited to protect SNs from nerve axotomy and accelerate nerve recovery [191–194]. Recently, alpha lipoic acid has been reported to improve clinical and neurophysiologic outcomes in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome after decompression surgery [195]. Phenolic compounds are secondary metabolites of plants and have strong anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. Naturally derived phenolic compounds, such as curcumin (Cur), quercetin, and epigallocatechin-3-gallate, have been reported to improve sensory and motor outcomes in different PNI models [196–199]. Moreover, the uptake of various vitamins and minerals, including magnesium and selenium, can also regulate inflammation and redox status in the nervous system and show beneficial effects in PNI recovery [200]. During clinical application for PNI, the administration of drugs like Alpha-lipoic acid, a mitochondrial antioxidant, had improved nerve conduction velocity and alleviated paresthesia for patients with carpal tunnel syndrome in a placebo-controlled clinical trial [201]. Patients with mild traumatic PNI or diabetic neuropathy showed reduced pain perception and improved motor strength after receiving plant-derived antioxidants like curcumin and quercetin in early-phase clinical studies [202, 203]. However, most antioxidant and anti-inflammatory macromolecules are unstable and can be rapidly removed through metabolic activities. Additionally, poor absorbance of some compounds also limits their bioavailability for target tissues, thereby reducing their effects. Agents with these limitations often need frequent administration or more invasive delivery methods.

2.3. Overall strategies for PNI

The PNI recovery strategies are diverse and are usually based on multiple underlying biological mechanisms. Overall, the main strategies contain: surgical approaches (like neurorrhaphy, autografting, allografting and synthetic nerve conduits), physical therapy-based interventions (exercise, EStim, ultrasound stimulation and magnetic stimulation), pharmacological therapies (anti-inflammatory drugs, antioxidant agents and exogenous neurotrophic factors), gene therapy (viral vector-based delivery), exosome-based therapy, and biomaterial-based delivery systems (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Summary of PNI treatments for recovery and rehabilitation. Upper panels: Schematics for the main current strategies for PNI. Lower panel: Physiological changes and shared mechanisms for these strategies.

Physical therapy interventions act through different neurobiological pathways. For example, ultrasound stimulation achieves its therapeutic effect by inducing mechanical perturbations in cellular membranes and cytoskeletal structures, which activates mechanosensitive ion channels and intracellular signaling to supports axonal outgrowth and remyelination [204]. Ultrasound has been suggested to promote local angiogenesis, enhancing oxygen and nutrient delivery to regenerate nerves after PNI. While the mechanism of magnetic stimulation (particularly repetitive transcranial and peripheral magnetic field exposure) involves altering the neuronal excitability through electromagnetic induction. It may alleviate chronic pain by regulating synaptic activity and modifying the neurochemical milieu, including levels of GABA and glutamate in pain-related tissue [205].

Pharmacological therapies primarily achieve their effects by interfering with oxidative and inflammatory cascades triggered by nerve injury. Anti-inflammatory agents like minocycline could inhibit microglial activation and prevent leukocyte infiltration by reducing the production of cytokines like TNF and IL-1β which induce neuropathy and demyelination [206]. Antioxidants like alpha-lipoic acid help scavenger ROS accumulation that damages mitochondrial membranes and ion channels in neurons and Schwann cells [207]. Application of neurotrophic factors like NGF act by binding to TrkA receptor to initiate MAPK/ERK and PI3K/Akt pathways to support neuronal survival and neurite extension [208].

Although each of these strategies often target different aspects of the injury and repair process, they may converge mechanistically. For example, both EStim and exercise cloud increase neurotrophic factor levels, while both biomaterials and exosomes may act by modulating immune cell phenotypes and reducing oxidative stress. However, the extent to which these shared mechanisms contribute to functional recovery remains unclear and warrants further investigation.

Despite their promise, surgical repair needs additional interventions to modulate the inflammatory or oxidative stress for neurons under long-term recovery [209]. Physical therapies usually have variable efficacy due to heavy dependence on patient condition and individual differences [210]. Pharmacological intervention is the main area for achieving high efficacy in PNI treatment but needs to prevent rapid degradation and poor bioavailability at the injury site.

Unlike biomaterial-driven drug delivery strategies, physical therapies are only suitable for early and mild injuries. Exercise requires active patient participation. For exercise and EStim, risk of excitotoxicity or worsening symptoms still exist, not to mention that the mechanisms behind them are not fully understood. The usage of biomaterial delivery techniques, like injectable hydrogels or nanoparticle systems, provides a reliable scaffold for localized, controlled and prolonged release of various type of drugs that could be antioxidants, neurotrophic factors, or anti-inflammatory agents. These delivery strategies are necessary especially when it is required to preserve therapeutic concentrations at the site of injury or to precisely target different stages of inflammation, cell debris clearance and nerve regeneration [211].

Biomaterial-based platforms and biotechnologies can achieve localized and sustained release of therapeutic agents to address these limitations with greater precision and flexibility. Thus, in this review, we will focus on the biomaterial-assisted drug and gene delivery systems in the following sections.

Collectively, PNI care depends on strategies including surgery, physical modulation (exercise, E-Stim, ultrasound, magnetic fields), pharmacology (anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, neurotrophic agents), gene transfer, exosome signaling, and biomaterial delivery (hydrogels, fibers, nanoparticles). They face different limitations like structural gap, neurotrophic deficit, cytokine/ROS surge, or prolonged protein expression. Yet they share mechanisms such as cAMP/PI3K-Akt activation and M2 macrophage polarization. The following sections focus on the biomaterial, which offers a precise method to program when and where drugs are delivered.

3. Biotechnologies for the delivery of therapeutic agents or genes to injured nerves

To date, considerable studies have sought to enhance the controlled release of therapeutic agents and maintain their bioactivity after administration for further exploitation of their therapeutic functions in PNI recovery. In addition, local administration can effectively increase regional drug bioavailability and bioactivity while reducing associated undesired side effects from systemic release. Biomaterials have been extensively used as implantable scaffolds and cell delivery platforms in the nervous system. Particularly, micro-/nano- particles and hydrogels made of natural or synthetic polymers are the two most common techniques for achieving long-lasting regional release. Here we summarized and described various biomaterials exploited in the last decade to locally deliver therapeutic cargos for PNI treatment (Table 1). Furthermore, we also summarized gene delivery for PNI treatment with virus- and exosome- dependent approaches (Table 2).

Table 1.

Summary of recent applications of micro- or nano-technologies and hydrogels for drug delivery in PNI treatment

Categories Biomaterials Payloads and sustained release Injury model Application Treatment outcomes
Micro- and nano- particles PLA/PLGA microparticles [219] Sustained release of NGF for 90 days in vitro Facial nerve defect in rabbits (10 mm) Injection into nerve guidance conduits 90-day post-surgery
  • Improved axon and myelin sheath regeneration

PLGA nanoparticles [220] Sustained release of NGF and bFGF for 28 days in vitro Sciatic nerve defect in rats (5 mm) Injection into nerve guidance conduits 12-week post-surgery
  • Improved nerve and muscle structure

  • Improved motor functions

PLGA microparticles[221] Sustained release of NGF and GDNF for 28 days in vitro Sciatic nerve defect in rats (15 mm) Incorporation into nerve conduits 8-week post-surgery
  • Enhanced nerve regeneration

  • Reduced loss of muscle weight

  • Improved functional recovery

PLGA nanoparticles [222] Sustained release of NGF, BDNF and NT-3 for 60 days in vitro. Nerve transection with end-to-end coaptation in rats Implantation in injured nerves 6-week post-surgery
  • Improved regeneration and myelination

PLGA microparticles [223] Sustained release of Rapamycin for 17 days in vitro Sciatic nerve defect in rats (20 mm) Incorporation into nerve conduits
  • 4-, 8- and 12-week post-surgery

  • Reduced NP and anxiety

  • Reduced expression of sodium channels including Nav1.3, Nav1.7 and Nav1.8 in DRG neurons

Double-walled PLGA/PLA microspheres[224] Sustained release of GDNF for more than 50 days in vitro Median nerve defect in a rhesus macaque model (5 cm) Incorporation into nerve conduits 1-year post-surgery
  • Increased nerve conduction velocity

  • Improved functional recovery

  • More myelinated axons

  • Comparable to autograft

PEG-b-PLGA nanoparticles[225] Sustained release of IGF-1 for more than 20 days in vitro Median nerve transection with delayed repair in rats Intramuscular injection
  • 8-week post-surgery

  • Sustained SCs activity

  • Reduced muscle atrophy

  • 15 weeks post-surgery

  • Improved neuromuscular reinnervation

  • Improved functional recovery

Gelatin nanoparticles[226] Sustained released of BDNF for 35 days in vitro Sciatic nerve defect in rabbits (15 mm) Incorporation into nerve conduits 8-, 16- and 24-week post-surgery
  • Improved nerve regeneration and myelination

  • Reduced muscle atrophy

  • Comparable to autograft

Chitosan nanoparticles[227] Sustained release of NGF from chitosan nanoparticles in the nerve conduit for 10 days in vitro Sciatic nerve defect in rats (10 mm) Incorporation into nerve conduits 4- and 9-week post-surgery
  • Improved nerve regeneration and functional outcomes

  • Comparable to autograft

TPP/Chitosan/PLGA microspheres[228] Sustained release of NGF for more than 49 days in vitro Sciatic nerve defect in rats (15 mm) Filling in nerve conduits 12-week post-surgery
  • Increased axons and SCs

  • Less muscle atrophy

Mineral coating β-tricalcium phosphate microparticles[229] Sustained release of NGF and GDNF for at least 22 days in vitro Sciatic nerve defect in rats (10 mm) Incorporation at the distal end of nerve isografts 12-week post-surgery
  • Increased axons and myelin

  • Better functional recovery

PEI-coated iron oxide nanoparticles[230] NGF and VEGF Median nerve defect in rats (5 mm) Injection into nerve conduits with magnetic tape
  • 6-week post-surgery

  • Accelerated nerve regeneration

  • Improved motor functions

RCP/plasmid DNA nanoparticles[231] c-Jun plasmids Sciatic nerve defect in rats (10 mm) Incorporation into nerve conduits 4-, 8- and 12-week post-surgery
  • Improved sensory and motor function recovery.

  • Ameliorated muscle atrophy.

  • Improved nerve regeneration.

  • Expansion of SCs and increased expression of VEGF and NGF.

Hydrogel PLGA-PEG-PLGA thermosensitive hydrogel[232] Sustained release of quercetin for 14 days in vitro Brachial plexus avulsion model in rats Injection to injured cervical spinal nerve 6 (C6) root 6-week post-surgery
  • Enhanced motor neuron survival

  • Improved nerve regeneration

  • Enhanced muscle innervation and less muscle atrophy

PLGA-PEG-PLGA thermosensitive hydrogel[233] Sustained release of Nogo-A extracellular peptide residues 1–40 for 14 days in vitro Brachial plexus avulsion model in rats Injection to injured cervical spinal nerve 6 (C6) root 6-week post-surgery
  • Enhanced motor neuron survival

  • Enhanced muscle innervation and less muscle atrophy

PLGA-PEG-PLGA thermosensitive hydrogel[234] Sustained release of erythropoietin for 21 days in vitro; hydrogel retention for 21 days in vivo Sciatic nerve crush injury in mice Injection to crushed nerve 3-week post-surgery
  • Enhanced vascularization

  • Improved sensorimotor functional recovery

  • Increased myelinated neural fibers

PLGA-PEG-PLGA thermosensitive hydrogel[235] Sustained release of 4-Aminopyridine for 28 days in vitro; hydrogel retention for 21 days in vivo Sciatic nerve crush injury in mice Injection to crushed nerve 3-week post-surgery
  • Improved sensorimotor functional recovery

  • Promoted remyelination

Fibrin hydrogel[236] Sustained release of Wnt5a for 30 days in vitro Sciatic nerve defect in rats (10 mm) Incorporation into nerve conduits 12-week post-surgery
  • Improved nerve angiogenesis, regeneration and remyelination

  • Improved electrophysiological recovery

  • Less muscle atrophy

  • Enhanced motor function

Fibrin hydrogel containing GDNF-loaded PLGA-heparin- MgCO3 microspheres[237] Sustained release of GDNF for 28 days in vitro Common peroneal nerve defect in rats (5 mm) Application to the coaptation sites between the transected nerve and the nerve isograft 8-week post-surgery
  • Improved sensory and motor nerve regeneration

Fibrin hydrogel containing FK506-PLGA microparticle[238] Sustained release of FK506 for 28 days in vivo Tibial nerve transection in rats Application to the coaptation site 3-week post-surgery
  • Increased number of myelinated axons

  • Avoiding systemic distribution

Chitosan and sericin hydrogel[239] Controllable release of NGF for 8 days in vitro; hydrogel retention for 8 weeks in vivo Chronic nerve compression in rats Application to the compressed nerves 4-week post-surgery
  • Relieved pain

  • Increased myelinated axons

  • Improved conductive functions

  • Reduced muscle atrophy

HA-pamidronate-Mg2+ hydrogel[240] Sustained release of Mg2+ for more than 15 days in vitro; hydrogel retention for 2 weeks in vivo Sciatic nerve defect in rats (10 mm) Injection into nerve conduits 12-week post-surgery
  • Improved locomotor function

  • Accelerated nerve regeneration and electrophysical function recovery

  • Reduced muscle atrophy

Pluronic-alginate thermosensitive hydrogel[241] Sustained release of extracellular vesicles for 3 days in vitro Sciatic nerve transection in rats Application to the coaptation site 3 months post-surgery
  • Improved nerve regeneration, myelination and conductive function

  • Enhanced muscle functions and reduced atrophy

GelMA hydrogel[242] Sustained release of VEGF for around 7 days in vitro Sciatic nerve crush in rats Injection into the epineurium of the crushed nerve and surrounding tissues 4-week post-surgery
  • Improved nerve angiogenesis, regeneration, myelination and conductive property

GelMA hydrogel containing VEGF-mimetic peptides-loaded nanoliposomes[243] Sustained release of VEGF peptides for around 4 days in vitro Sciatic nerve crush in rats Injection into the epineurium of the crushed nerve 4-week post-surgery
  • Facilitated macrophage polarization into M2 phenotype

  • Improved nerve angiogenesis, regeneration, myelination and conductive property

  • Promoted functional recovery

  • Reduced muscle atrophy

Table 2.

Summary of recent applications of virus-based gene delivery for PNI recovery

Viral vector Injury model Application Treatment outcome
AAV-CNTF[262] Crushed sciatic nerve in mice Injection in the injured sciatic nerve 30 days after injury
  • The AAV-CNTF transduced SCs and promoted nerve regeneration and myelination.

LV-NGF and -GDNF[263] Nerve transection in rats Injection in the distal peroneal and tibial branches of the sciatic nerve 4 weeks after transection
  • Increased nociceptive phenotype in sensory neurons but not regeneration

  • Entrapment of motor axons due to high GDNF

AAV1/2-G-CSF[264] Sciatic nerve crush injury on SOD-1 (G93A) mice Intraspinal injection 6 days after injury
  • Improved innervated NMJs in the gastrocnemius muscle

AAV9-shTRPV1[265] Spared nerve injury Intrathecal injection 112 days after injury
  • Partially attenuated thermal hyperalgesia in response to 50 °C heat stimulation

  • No significant changes in mechanical, cold, and 55 °C heat stimulation induced pain.

AAV2/5 shRNAmir-Nav1.3[266] Spared nerve injury in rats DRG injection 3 weeks after injury
  • Downregulated Nav1.3 in DRG neurons

  • Attenuated injury-induced mechanical allodynia

AAV9-NaV1.7-CRS[267] Spared nerve injury in mice Intrathecal injection 54 days after injury
  • Prevented the development of mechanical allodynia following SNI

  • Without impairment of motor or anxiety behaviors

AAV6- NaViPA1[268] Tibial nerve injury in rat DRG injection 6 weeks after injury
  • NaViPA1 expression attenuated evoked and spontaneous pain behaviors by reversing neuron hypersensitivity.

AAV9 sCSF1R[269] Partial sciatic nerve ligation in mice Intrathecal injection 15 days after injury
  • High expression of sCSF1R in spinal cord and DRG

  • Decreased CSF1 expression in DRG neurons and spinal motor neurons

  • Decreased microgliosis and macrophage accumulation

  • Attenuated injury-induced mechanical allodynia

AAV9- VGAT and GAD65 [270] Sciatic nerve ligation in mice Ipsilateral (L3-L5) subpial injection 10 weeks after injury
  • Reversed tactile and brush-evoked pain

  • Increased inhibitory activity in regional spinal circuitry

These biomaterial-based delivery methods for PNI recovery mentioned in Table 1 are mainly delivered by localized implantation or injection. Microparticles and nanoparticles are usually included into nerve guidance conduits or directly injected into the injured nerve or adjacent muscle tissues [212]. While hydrogels may be administered through injections around injured nerve and undergo in situ gelation at physiological temperatures [213].

The releasing mechanisms depends on the design of biomaterial scaffold components. PLGA and PEG-modified polymers achieve serum stability through reduced premature degradation and opsonization. For example, the degradation of rapamycin-loaded PLGA particle was through the hydrolysis into lactic and glycolic acid, which gradually degrade the particle matrix and allow for biphasic drug release [214]. And the loaded rapamycin could inhibit the mTORC1 signaling pathway that regulates neuroinflammation and sensory neuron sensitization and reduced the expression of sodium channels in DRG neurons [215]. Targeting specificity in this biomaterial delivery system is achieved by local application instead of antibody-targeting capacity to any specific cell types like neurons.

The release of the gelatin nanoparticles nerve conduits loaded with BDNF as used by Dr. Chang relies on enzymatic degradation of gelatin by matrix metalloproteinases and other proteases in the ECM after implantation [216]. BDNF binds and activates TrkB receptors in neurons and thus the following ERK and PI3K/Akt pathways to enhance axonal survival and remyelination [217]. Its targeting specificity depends on local implantation and the diffusion of BDNF in a concentration-dependent manner from the conduit lumen to adjacent regenerating axons that provide directional guidance [218]

3.1. Nano-/micro- particles for long-lasting drug release for PNI recovery

Pharmaceutical nano-/micro- particle technologies have gained increased interest for drug delivery in the past few decades. The advantages of nano-/micro- particles are attributed to their small sizes that can facilitate deep-tissue penetration and cellular uptake as well as their large surface area per unit volume, which is applicable for modification for multifunctional drug delivery [244]. Depending on different physical and chemical properties of drugs and biomaterials, drugs can be released from the particles in various kinetics, which generally can be affected by the degree of drug diffusion, solvent transportation, particle degradation, or stimuli-induced destruction [245].

Biodegradable polyesters can be used to encapsulate diverse ingredients for controllable delivery and release. Particularly, PLGA synthesized by the polymerization of cyclic lactide and glycolide monomers is one of the few biodegradable polymers with FDA approval for clinical applications due to its acceptable biocompatibility and tunable biodegradability [246]. Many studies [219–222] have reported the encapsulation of a single or a combination of NTFs in PLGA nano-/micro- particles, which achieve a long-lasting release of payloads for more than one month. Implantation of particles either within nerve guidance conduits or into injured nerves improved axon and myelin sheath regeneration and promoted functional recovery. For example, Ding et al.,[223] encapsulated Rapamycin, an immunosuppressant, within PLGA microparticles that were further incorporated into nerve conduits. The application of the Rapamycin-PLGA-scaffolds reduced PNI-induced pain and neuron sensitization. Fadia et al.,[224] developed GDNF-loaded double-walled PLGA/PLA microspheres. Embedding GDNF microspheres into nerve conduits sustained the release of GDNF for more than 50 days. The application of the GDNF microsphere-embedded nerve conduits improved never conductive functions and promoted SC activity and axonal remyelination in a rhesus macaque model with a 5 cm nerve defect at one-year post-surgery. Encapsulation of water-soluble factors in particles is challenging because they cannot be dissolved in the hydrophobic solvent and thus can easily leak out of the core of the particles. To enhance the encapsulation efficiency, Hanwright et al.,[225] made insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and dextran sulfate polyelectrolyte complexes and further encapsulated the complexes into polyethylene glycol (PEG)-b-PLGA nanoparticles. Local application of the IGF-1 nanoparticles through intramuscular injection showed improved neuromuscular reinnervation, reduced muscle atrophy, and greater functional recovery.

Natural biodegradable polymers have also been studied to function as drug carriers due to their extraordinary biocompatibility. Chang et al.,[226] used BDNF-loaded gelatin nanoparticles to establish a neurotrophic gradient in a nerve conduit. By functioning together with NGF released from the conduit scaffold, NTFs showed guiding effects during axon growth, thus leading to better nerve regeneration and ameliorated muscle atrophy that is comparable to the autograft repair in a long-gap nerve defect. Chitosan is a positively charged polysaccharide that is naturally derived from chitin, which is abundant in crustacean exoskeletons, and it is one of the major natural polymers with a broad usage in diagnosis and drug delivery systems [247]. Wei et al.,[227] encapsulated NGF within chitosan nanoparticles and then embedded them into the matrix of nerve conduits. The sustained release of NGF from the chitosan nanoparticles in the nerve conduit was comparable to the autograft repair in terms of nerve regeneration and functional recovery after nerve transection. In addition, as chitosan has the capacity to neutralize the acidic environment during the degradation of polyesters that may deactivate bioactive proteins, Zeng et al.,[228] modified PLGA microspheres with tripolyphosphate (TPP) crosslinked chitosan. The extended the release of NGF to more than 49 days. Implantation of nerve conduits filled with the TPP-chitosan-PLGA-NGF microspheres enhanced sciatic nerve regeneration and prevented gastrocnemius muscle atrophy at 12 weeks post-surgery.

Some newly developed nano- and micro-technologies have also been exploited in the area of peripheral nerve trauma [248, 249]. It has been demonstrated that nanostructured mineral coatings can effectively stabilize protein structures and thus prevent them from denaturation [250]. Hellenbrand et al.,[229] processed β-tricalcium phosphate microparticles in modified simulated body fluid, and they found that the derived mineral coating microparticles stabilized and released NGF and GDNF for at least 22 days in vitro. They incorporated the NGF and GDNF microspheres into the distal end of sciatic nerve isografts, which showed beneficial effects in functional recovery, axon regrowth, and remyelination. Magnetic nanoparticles have also been studied with increasing interest for time- and spatially-controlled drug release since they are guidable through the application of a remote magnetic field [251]. Giannaccini et al.,[230] produced polyethylenimine (PEI)-coated magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for the delivery of NGF and VEGF within nerve guidance conduits. They placed a magnetic tape around the conduits to localize neurotrophic factors at the center of the conduits, thus promoting axon sprouting and motor functions. And according to Li et al., non-invasive photostimulation by embedding near-infrared up-conversion nanoparticles has significantly increased myelinated-fiber density after sciatic crush [252].

3.2. Hydrogels for regional long-lasting drug release for PNI recovery

A hydrogel, formed by crosslinking between hydrophilic molecule chains, is a 3D network with a highly porous structure and contains large amounts of water [253, 254]. Hydrogels are composed of versatile matrices with varying components and interaction arrangements, enabling them to exhibit a wide range of structural, chemical, and physical properties. These characteristics directly influence the release kinetics of hydrogel-based drug delivery systems [253]. Particularly, hydrogels with injectability and responsiveness to external stimuli greatly extend the operative possibility for in situ drug delivery and controlled release. A PLGA-PEG-PLGA copolymer is thermosensitive and can convert from a liquid phase to hydrogel at a physiologically relevant temperature [255]. Manto et al.,[234, 235] reported that payload-PLGA-PEG injected into injured sciatic nerves formed a hydrogel that gradually degraded for around 20 days in vivo. The PLGA-PEG-PLGA thermosensitive hydrogel has been used to control the long-term release of therapeutic cargos for 14 days [232, 233], and implantation of the hydrogel supported neuron survival, promoted nerve regeneration, and preserved the integrity of neuromuscular junctions in a brachial plexus avulsion model. And an injectable thermosensitive pluronic F127/nano-hydroxyapatite-polydopamine hydrogel further accelerated crush-injury repair and reduced oxidative stress after crush injury [256]. Fibrin is FDA approved for hemostasis and wound healing, and the mechanical properties of the fibrin hydrogel can be modulated based on the constituent ratio of fibrinogen and thrombin. Liu et al.,[236] filled nerve conduits with a fibrin hydrogel with a payload of Wnt5a, a crucial factor in regulating nerve growth and SC activity. The incorporation of Wnt5a and fibrin hydrogel resulted in superior outcomes in terms of nerve fiber growth and myelination, conductive functions, vascularization, muscle atrophy, and motor functions compared to groups with either Wnt5a or fibrin hydrogel alone. In addition, Tajdaran et al.,[237, 238] first encapsulated neurotrophic factors and an FDA-approved immunosuppressant, FK506, within microparticles and then further incorporated these microparticles into fibrin hydrogels to enhance the controllability of drug release. Direct application of fibrin hydrogels to transected nerve not only promoted nerve growth across the coaptation sites but also effectively restricted drug accumulation in the repaired nerve, muscle, and spinal cord, thereby avoiding the systemic distribution and preventing the toxic effects of FK506. Naturally occurring polysaccharides have also been exploited to develop hydrogel technologies in biomedical applications due to their biocompatibility, nontoxicity, and non-immunogenicity. Zhang et al.,[239] fabricated chitosan hydrogels and incorporated sericin, a component derived from silkworm silk, to enhance mechanical endurance. The chitosan/sericin hydrogels released most of the loaded NGF within 8 days in vitro, while they underwent gradual degradation after implantation in vivo for 8 weeks. Application of the chitosan/sericin hydrogel induced pro-regenerative reactions in the nerve, prevented inflammation, protected nerve microstructure and conductive functions, and provided pain relief in a chronic nerve compression model. Yao et al.,[240] grafted hyaluronic acid (HA) with pamidronate, a bisphosphonate that can bind with various metal ions, to deliver Mg2+ for PNI repair. Due to the dynamic property of the coordination bonds between Mg2+ and pamidronate [257], the hydrogel is shear thinning, injectable, self-healing, and progressively disassembling along with the dissipation of Mg2+. The HA-pamidronate-Mg2+ hydrogel was injected to fill nerve conduits during the surgery, followed by gradual degradation within 2 weeks, but the effects accelerating nerve regeneration and functional restoration lasted for 12 weeks. Complementary work also showed that Mg-sputtered collagen conduits enhanced bio-electric coupling and functional recovery across 20-mm gaps [258]. Alginate is a natural polysaccharide extracted from brown sea algae, and ionic Ca2+ can induce chain-chain crosslinking that leads to its gel formation. An alginate-based copolymer hydrogel has been reported to have enhanced cell compatibility[259]. Chen et al.,[241] incorporated alginate into a Pluronic F127 thermosensitive hydrogel with the addition of positively charged lysine-dextran to control the release of adipose-derived stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles. Recently, a chirality-engineered D-matrix hydrogel has demonstrated the ability to influence Schwann cell redifferentiation and enhance the sciatic functional index by around 30% in a 10 mm rat gap model [260]. The pluronic-alginate hydrogel exhibited an improved stability, and a longer release profile compared to a single Pluronic F127 hydrogel. The application of the hydrogel around coaptated nerves facilitated nerve regeneration and prevented muscle atrophy. Gelatin is denatured collagen and contains abundant Arg-Gly-Asp sequences and integrin-binding motifs, which can support cell attachment and proliferation. The introduction of methacryloyl substituent groups to gelatin makes it have photo-triggered crosslinking to form a GelMA hydrogel [261]. Xu et al.,[242, 243] encapsulated VEGF or VEGF-mimetic peptides-loaded nanoliposomes in a GelMA hydrogel, which was applied to injured nerves through injection with irradiation-induced in situ gelation to enhance regional vascularization and consequently benefit nerve regeneration.

3.3. Virus-based gene delivery for PNI recovery

Gene therapy performed by delivering therapeutic genetic components with viral vectors to lesion tissue has been reported for PNI treatment, aiming to sustainably support nerve regeneration and neuron protection. Genes encoding various neurotrophic factors have been delivered to the lesion area. In situ injection of AAV8 that carried a gene for CNTF transduced SCs around the lesion and enhanced nerve regeneration and myelination [262]. However, a huge hurdle exists with neurotrophic factor-dependent gene therapy due to their potential side effects. Persistent expression of high levels of GDNF has entrapped axons and prevented them from further growth and innervation, due to the so-called “candy store” effect. Meanwhile, the long-term effects of NGF may induce nociception [263]. Besides neurotrophic factors, the intraspinal delivery of AAV that carried a gene for G-CSF showed protection effects on motor neurons in SOD-1 (G93A) transgenic mice, a disease model of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis with progressive degeneration of motor neurons, and it also supported motor axon regeneration and reinnervation after a crush injury [264]. In addition to nerve regeneration, diverse genes have been studied for pain management after PNI. Small hairpin RNA for TRPV1 [265], a nociceptive receptor, and sodium channels [266] have been designed to downregulate their expression, and AAV carrying genes coding for peptides that coupled with NaV1.7 blocked the Na+ current [267, 268], decreasing the excitability of sensory neurons and thus relieving PNI-induced pain. Moreover, the regulation of neuroinflammation after PNI is also feasible by gene delivery. Gushchina et al.,[269] reported that gene delivery of non-functional soluble colony stimulating factor-1 receptor (sCSF1R) decreased microglia and macrophage accumulation in both the spinal cord and DRGs after a PNI. The neuroplastic changes in the spinal cord after a PNI could also be further modulated based on AAV gene therapy. Takahiro et al.,[270] found that subpial delivery of a GABA synthesizing-releasing system, including genes encoding for GAD65 and vesicular GABA transporter, switched spinal dorsal excitatory neurons to an inhibitory phenotype, thereby achieving a long-lasting reversal of PNI-induced pain.

3.4. Exosome-based therapy

Exosomes (Exos) are one of the extracellular vehicles generated and released from cells through the endocytic pathway. Exos encapsulate various bioactive molecules, predominantly nucleic acids and proteins, and thus, they are thought to play a role in modulating intercellular communication. Meanwhile, as Exos have demonstrated favorable features for delivering therapeutic cargos, including stability, biocompatibility, low immunogenicity, and prolonged blood circulation, their therapeutic potential has been explored in neurodegenerative diseases in recent years [271–273]. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are multipotent cells that secrete many bioactive molecules, such as immunomodulatory factors and growth factors. They have been transplanted to injury and pathological areas, mediating cell response through paracrine factor secretion [274]. MSC-derived Exos may have similar effects as MSC-based therapy and have less ethical and safety concerns. Exos from bone marrow-derived MSCs (BMSC-Exos) have been suggested to regulate the inflammatory activity of macrophages [275]. In addition, BMSC-Exos exhibited functions in neuritogenesis, with miRNA-dependent mechanisms [276]. Exos derived from induced pluripotent stem cells [277] and adipose-derived MSCs (hADMSCs) [278] also benefited the recovery after a PNI. After injury, SCs differentiated, proliferated, and secreted factors to support axonal regeneration. An injection of SC-derived Exos (SC-Exos) to a crushed sciatic nerve resulted in internalization of the Exos into nerve fibers and thus facilitated the growth of axons, which was significantly faster 4 days after injury [279]. Recently, Jun et al.,[280] reported that hypoxia induced an upregulation of miR-21–5p in SC-Exos, which further regulated endothelial metabolism, including glycolysis, oxidative phosphorylation, and intraneural revascularization. Our group and others [278, 281, 282] collected Exos from hADMSC-derived SC-like cells (hADMSC-SCLCs). Our group decellularized porcine sciatic nerves, digested the matrix into a neutralisable pre-gel and blended it with 25 kDa polyethyleneimine (PEI) to yield a modified decellularized nerve hydrogel (pDNH) [278]. Differentiated hADMSCs (denoted as dExo) isolated by ultracentrifugation were electrostatically entrapped in the pDNH, which cross-linked within 1 h at 37 °C to form an injectable in-situ–gelling matrix. The dExo-loaded pDNH was locally injected around a mouse sciatic-nerve crush to envelope the lesion and provid slow exosome release. Then behavioural tests, histology and TEM over 21 days was tested to confirm faster axon regrowth and inhibited macrophage activation. The process of how Exos derived from the differentiated dExo which was further encapsulated within a pDNH is shown in Fig. 4A–C [278]. Then the dExo-loaded pDNH was applied around injured nerves in a mouse sciatic nerve crush injury model (Fig. 4A). The incorporation of the positively charged PEI enhanced the in vivo retention time of the dExo (Fig. 4 D). The group treated with the dExo-loaded pDNH, but not those treated with dExo or pDNH alone, demonstrated a significant improvement in motor function recovery (Fig. 4E, F). Macrophages play a pivotal role in the regeneration process following traumatic nerve injury. Nerves from the Sham group showed few CD68 and colony-stimulating factor-1 receptor (CSF-1R) positive cells, whereas, the Crush, pDNH, and dExo groups exhibited a significant increase in macrophage numbers, particularly in the Crush group (Fig. 4G–J). Notably, the dExo-loaded pDNH treatment reduced CD68 and CSF-1R intensities and the positive areas, indicating that the dExo-loaded pDNH may enhance axon continuity and preserve neural integrity by alleviating long-term inflammation. Vascularization after PNI is an indispensable process for oxygen and nutrient supplementation and debris clearance. Exos from endothelial cells (EC-Exos) were taken up by SCs and maintained the repair phenotype of SCs by upregulating miR199–5p and activating the proliferative pathway[283]. To further enhance the pro-regenerative effects of EC-Exos, Huang et al.,[284] developed ECs with an overexpression of Netrin-1 (NTN1), which is upregulated after PNI and functions in axon guidance. Treatment with NTN1-EC-Exos could enhance the neuronal regenerative ability by down-regulating let7a-5p and activating pro-regenerative pathways. Meanwhile, NTN1-EC-Exos also facilitated the formation of a pro-regenerative environment with increased proliferative vascular cells and SCs with repair-related phenotypes. Exos from fibroblasts (f-Exos) have been studied for PNI recovery [285]. After pre-conditioning with chitosan oligosaccharides (COS), COS-f-Exos were enriched with TFAP2C that targets miR-132–5p, thus disinhibiting the capability of neurite outgrowth.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Differentiated ADMSC-derived Exos immobilized in pDNH for peripheral nerve repair [278]. (A) Illustration of fabrication of dExo-loaded pDNH and their application in treating sciatic nerve crush injuries. (B) Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining images of native and decellularized nerves. (C) Representative photos of pDNH pre-gel and hydrogel after thermal crosslinking. (D) The retention time of the DiR-labeled dExo and DiR-labeled dExo-loaded pDNH for 1, 3, 7, 14, and 21 days after implantation by IVIS analysis. (E) Representative images of mouse footprints were recorded while the mice walked on the walking apparatus. (F) Quantitative data analysis for the foot pressure, stance duration, and swing duration based on the ratio of the experimental foot (left hind in the system, LH) to the contralateral healthy foot (right hind in the system, RH) on day 21 (n = 4). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. (G-J) Immunofluorescent staining analysis of CD68 and CSF-1R in the sciatic nerves on day 21 post-surgery. (G) CD68 positive cells in longitudinal-sectional nerves. (H) Semi-quantitative data analysis of CD68 positive areas in each group (n = 3). (I) Detection of positive expression of CSF-1R. (J) Semi-quantitative data analysis of CSF-1R positive area in each group (n = 3). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

3.5. Overall biotechnologies strategies for PNI

Various biotechnological delivery toolkits have been developed during the recent decade. At the materials level, polymeric micro-/nanoparticles (e.g., PLGA, PEG-PLGA, gelatin, chitosan) and injectable or in situ–gelling hydrogels (thermosensitive PLGA-PEG-PLGA, fibrin, chitosan/sericin, HA-pamidronate, Pluronic-alginate, photo-cross-linked GelMA) are the most frequently used methods that is capable of releasing trophic factors, immunomodulators or ions from days to months while preventing cargos from premature degradation and systemic toxicity. They are designed based on degradable backbones, enzyme-responsive linkages or mineral coatings that translate polymer erosion, protease activity or ion exchange into controllable burst-and-sustain kinetics. While magnetic or mineral coatings could add remote localization and protein-stabilizing functions. As for genetic-engineering vector technologies, AAV or lentiviral constructs could drive expression of neurotrophic genes or pain-modulating shRNAs during weeks to months. The exosomes derived from MSC, Schwann or endothelial cells could deliver miRNAs without immunogenicity. When these platforms are delivered locally such as inside guidance conduits, within muscle or intrathecally, they consistently improve pain relief, neuromuscular junction integrity, axon extension, myelination, and vascularization. They usually share requirements for modulating cargo specificity, regulating release half-life, and placement consideration.

4. Current challenges and perspectives

Despite surgical advancements and nerve grafting techniques, patients often experience incomplete functional recovery, particularly in motor function. The limited regeneration and reinnervation of motor neurons result in persistent deficits in strength, coordination, and movement. Therefore, developing innovative biomaterials, therapeutic agents, engineered nerve conduits, and advanced devices could address these limitations. Biomaterial scaffolds and devices with integrated drug delivery systems, bioprinted tissue constructs, or bioelectric devices could provide enhanced guidance for axonal growth and motor function recovery. Future research should focus on combining these approaches with rehabilitation protocols to achieve synergistic effects.

While physical exercise and EStim are known to enhance nerve regeneration, their therapeutic parameters, regimens, and underlying mechanisms of action are not fully defined. The lack of standardization in clinical and experimental settings limits their widespread adoption and consistent efficacy. Further comprehensive studies are essential for defining the optimal stimulation frequencies, intensities, and durations for specific injuries and nerve types. Additionally, mechanistic studies for understanding the pathways activated by these therapies can guide the development of personalized rehabilitation strategies. Innovations, such as wearable EStim devices or robotic-assisted exercise systems, may further enhance their utility.

Although biomaterial-based approaches, especially nerve guidance conduits and drug-delivery hydrogels, hold promise for PNI treatment, few of them have progressed from preclinical studies into clinical translation studies. FDA-approved conduits like collagen-based Neurotube and ECM-derived Axoguard have achieved functional sensory recovery compared with autografts in patients with short gap digital nerve injuries [286, 287]. To accelerate clinical translation, future studies should emphasize long-term safety and standardized outcome measures. Collaboration between bioengineers, clinicians, and regulatory bodies will also be essential to streamline the approval and adoption of next-generation nerve repair technologies.

Chronic inflammation is a significant barrier for effective nerve repair, often resulting in fibrosis and impaired regeneration. The precise role of macrophages in the different stages of nerve repair—ranging from clearing debris to promoting regeneration—is not fully understood, making it difficult to harness their potential. Future research should focus on achieving temporal and spatial control of macrophage phenotypes in the transition from pro-inflammatory to pro-regenerative states at the appropriate stages of healing. Advanced biomaterials that release immunomodulatory agents in a controlled manner or gene therapies that target macrophage polarization pathways could revolutionize inflammation management in nerve repair.

PNI regeneration requires a series of coordinated events, including axonal growth, remyelination, angiogenesis, and immune modulation. The lack of therapeutic strategies that simultaneously target these interconnected processes limits recovery outcomes. In addition, the slow rate of axonal regrowth during PNI repair often leads to prolonged denervation, resulting in severe atrophy of skeletal muscles and maladaptive neuroplasticity in the CNS. These secondary complications significantly impair functional recovery. It should be noticed that axonal regeneration alone does not guarantee functional recovery, which requires the reinnervation to the correct targets and restoration of neuromuscular junctions [288]. This failure in regaining actual motor and sensory function often results in misdirected axon regeneration, muscle atrophy and maladaptive plasticity in patients [289]. Strategies for preventing muscle atrophy and maintaining CNS integrity during nerve regeneration are urgently needed. Integrating biomaterial, gene-editing, and delivery-based interventions with optimized rehabilitation protocols, such as electrical stimulation and physical therapy, may help preserve the functional potential during the extended recovery phase.

Table 3.

Summary of recent applications of Exo for PNI recovery

Exosome Injury model Application Treatment outcome
BMSC-Exos[275] Diabetic sciatic nerve crush injury in rats BMSCs-Exos loaded in an electroconductive hydrogels that wrapped around injured nerve. 14 days after injury:
  • Enhanced myelinated axonal regeneration

Attenuated inflammatory pain
BMSC- Exos [276] Sciatic nerve crush in rats BMSCs-Exos injected into the gastrocnemius muscles 28 days after injury:
  • Increased expression of PMP22, VEGFA, NGFr, and S100b in DRGs

  • Enhanced axonal regeneration and improved sensory and motor functions.

iPSCs-Exos[277] 15-mm long defects in rat sciatic nerves Acellular nerve grafts supplemented with iPSCs-Exos 8 and 12 weeks after injury:
  • Increased the number of regenerated myelinated axons

  • Accelerated strength recovery of muscles

SCs-Exos[279] Sciatic nerve crush injury in rats Injection into the distal part of the sciatic nerve at 25 mm from the crush site. 4 days after injury:
  • Increased GAP43-positive neurites.

Hypoxic SCs-Exos[280] Sciatic nerve crush injury in rats Local injection to the injured site. 8 weeks after injury:
  • Both normoxic and hypoxoc SCs-Exos enhanced intraneural revascularization by reprogramming endothelial energy metabolism

hADMSC-SCLC-Exos[278] Sciatic nerve crush in mice Exos loaded in decellularized porcine nerve hydrogels 21 days after injury:
  • Enhanced nerve regeneration and decreased inflammation

hADMSC-SCLC-Exos [281] 3-mm long defect in rat sciatic nerve Exos injected into nerve graft 6 weeks after injury:
  • Facilitated axonal regrowth, myelin formation and angiogenesis

  • Improved functional recovery and attenuated gastrocnemius muscle atrophy

EC-Exos[283] Sciatic nerve crush in rats Multi-site injections of EC-Exos in the injured nerve. 28 days after injury:
  • Decreased the apoptotic levels of nerve tissue

  • Enhanced nerve regeneration, myelination and angiogenesis

NTN1 EC-Exos[284] Sciatic nerve crush in rats Injections of exosomes under the epineurium of the sciatic nerve 28 days after injury:
  • Promoted NTN1-mediated angiogenesis and formation of pro-regenerative vascular niche

  • Enhanced myelination by boosting repair-related phenotypes of SCs

COS-f-Exos[285] 10-mm long defects in rat sciatic nerves Silicon tube filled with COS-f-Exos 14 and 28 days after injury:
  • Enhanced nerve regeneration and motor function recovery.

  • COS-f-Exos containing TFAP2C targeted miR-132–5p, which may regulate CAMKK1 and promote neurogenesis.

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by the University of Nebraska Collaboration Initiative Grant, LB606 Nebraska Stem Cell Grant, and NIH R21NS131938 and R21AR078439.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References:

  • [1].Grinsell D, Keating CP, Peripheral nerve reconstruction after injury: a review of clinical and experimental therapies, Biomed Res Int 2014 (2014) 698256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Vela FJ, Martínez-Chacón G, Ballestín A, Campos JL, Sánchez-Margallo FM, Abellán E, Animal models used to study direct peripheral nerve repair: a systematic review, Neural regeneration research 15(3) (2020) 491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Houdek MT, Shin AY, Management and complications of traumatic peripheral nerve injuries, Hand Clinics 31(2) (2015) 151–163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Lizeth Castillo-Galvan M, Maximiliano Martinez-Ruiz F, de la Garza-Castro O, Enrique Elizondo-Omana R, Guzman-Lopez S, Study of peripheral nerve injury in patients attended by traumatism, GACETA MEDICA DE MEXICO 150(6) (2014) 527–532. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Noble J, Munro CA, Prasad VS, Midha R, Analysis of upper and lower extremity peripheral nerve injuries in a population of patients with multiple injuries, J Trauma 45(1) (1998) 116–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Umansky D, Midha R, Commentary: Rapid-stretch injury to peripheral nerves: Histologic results, Neurosurgery 86(3) (2020) E333–E334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Sunderland SS, The anatomy and physiology of nerve injury, Muscle & Nerve: Official Journal of the American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine 13(9) (1990) 771–784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Tapadia M, Mozaffar T, Gupta R, Compressive neuropathies of the upper extremity, Update on pathophysiology, classification, and electrodiagnostic findings 2010 (2010) 35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Menorca RM, Fussell TS, Elfar JC, Peripheral nerve trauma: mechanisms of injury and recovery, Hand clinics 29(3) (2013) 317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Townsend CM, Beauchamp RD, Evers BM, Mattox KL, Sabiston textbook of surgery, Elsevier Health Sciences; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Campbell WW, Evaluation and management of peripheral nerve injury, Clinical neurophysiology 119(9) (2008) 1951–1965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Seddon H, Three types of nerve injury, Brain 66(4) (1943) 237–288. [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Sunderland S, A classification of peripheral nerve injuries producing loss of function, Brain 74(4) (1951) 491–516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Burnett MG, Zager EL, Pathophysiology of peripheral nerve injury: a brief review, Neurosurgical focus 16(5) (2004) 1–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Bosch-Queralt M, Fledrich R, Stassart RM, Schwann cell functions in peripheral nerve development and repair, Neurobiology of Disease 176 (2023) 105952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Griffin JW, Hogan MV, Chhabra AB, Deal DN, Peripheral nerve repair and reconstruction, J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(23) (2013) 2144–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Faroni A, Mobasseri SA, Kingham PJ, Reid AJ, Peripheral nerve regeneration: Experimental strategies and future perspectives, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 82–83 (2015) 160–167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Pandey S, Mudgal J, A review on the role of endogenous neurotrophins and schwann cells in axonal regeneration, Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology 17(3–4) (2022) 398–408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Idrisova KF, Zeinalova AK, Masgutova GA, Bogov AA Jr, Allegrucci C, Syromiatnikova VY, Salafutdinov II, Garanina EE, Andreeva DI, Kadyrov AA, Application of neurotrophic and proangiogenic factors as therapy after peripheral nervous system injury, Neural Regeneration Research 17(6) (2022) 1240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Allodi I, Udina E, Navarro X, Specificity of peripheral nerve regeneration: interactions at the axon level, Progress in neurobiology 98(1) (2012) 16–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Gordon T, The role of neurotrophic factors in nerve regeneration, Neurosurgical focus 26(2) (2009) E3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Lee SE, Shen H, Taglialatela G, Chung JM, Chung K, Expression of nerve growth factor in the dorsal root ganglion after peripheral nerve injury, Brain research 796(1–2) (1998) 99–106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Bracci-Laudiero L, Aloe L, Caroleo MC, Buanne P, Costa N, Starace G, Lundeberg T, Endogenous NGF regulates CGRP expression in human monocytes, and affects HLA-DR and CD86 expression and IL-10 production, Blood 106(10) (2005) 3507–3514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Taniuchi M, Clark HB, Schweitzer JB, Johnson E, Expression of nerve growth factor receptors by Schwann cells of axotomized peripheral nerves: ultrastructural location, suppression by axonal contact, and binding properties, Journal of Neuroscience 8(2) (1988) 664–681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Sulaiman OAR, Gordon T, Effects of short- and long-term Schwann cell denervation on peripheral nerve regeneration, myelination, and size, Glia 32(3) (2000) 234–246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Gordon T, Tyreman N, Raji MA, The basis for diminished functional recovery after delayed peripheral nerve repair, Journal of Neuroscience 31(14) (2011) 5325–5334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Friedman WJ, Greene LA, Neurotrophin signaling via Trks and p75, Experimental cell research 253(1) (1999) 131–142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Huang EJ, Reichardt LF, Trk receptors: roles in neuronal signal transduction, Annual review of biochemistry 72(1) (2003) 609–642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Aloe L, Rocco ML, Bianchi P, Manni L, Nerve growth factor: from the early discoveries to the potential clinical use, Journal of translational medicine 10(1) (2012) 1–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Richner M, Ulrichsen M, Elmegaard SL, Dieu R, Pallesen LT, Vaegter CB, Peripheral nerve injury modulates neurotrophin signaling in the peripheral and central nervous system, Molecular neurobiology 50(3) (2014) 945–970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Perez-Pinera P, García-Suarez O, Germanà A, Díaz-Esnal B, de Carlos F, Silos-Santiago I, del Valle M, Cobo J, Vega J, Characterization of sensory deficits in TrkB knockout mice, Neuroscience letters 433(1) (2008) 43–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Geremia NM, Pettersson LM, Hasmatali J, Hryciw T, Danielsen N, Schreyer DJ, Verge VM, Endogenous BDNF regulates induction of intrinsic neuronal growth programs in injured sensory neurons, Experimental neurology 223(1) (2010) 128–142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Lamballe F, Klein R, Barbacid M, trkC, a new member of the trk family of tyrosine protein kinases, is a receptor for neurotrophin-3, Cell 66(5) (1991) 967–979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Fariñas I, Jones KR, Backus C, Wang X-Y, Reichardt LF, Severe sensory and sympathetic deficits in mice lacking neurotrophin-3, Nature 369(6482) (1994) 658–661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Ernfors P, Lee K-F, Kucera J, Jaenisch R, Lack of neurotrophin-3 leads to deficiencies in the peripheral nervous system and loss of limb proprioceptive afferents, Cell 77(4) (1994) 503–512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Höke A, Redett R, Hameed H, Jari R, Zhou C, Li Z, Griffin J, Brushart T, Schwann cells express motor and sensory phenotypes that regulate axon regeneration, Journal of Neuroscience 26(38) (2006) 9646–9655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Sun H, Yang T, Li Q, Zhu Z, Wang L, Bai G, Li D, Li Q, Wang W, Dexamethasone and vitamin B12 synergistically promote peripheral nerve regeneration in rats by upregulating the expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor, Archives of medical science: AMS 8(5) (2012) 924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Sahenk Z, Oblinger J, Edwards C, Neurotrophin-3 deficient Schwann cells impair nerve regeneration, Experimental neurology 212(2) (2008) 552–556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Keefe KM, Sheikh IS, Smith GM, Targeting neurotrophins to specific populations of neurons: NGF, BDNF, and NT-3 and their relevance for treatment of spinal cord injury, International journal of molecular sciences 18(3) (2017) 548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Cintrón-Colón AF, Almeida-Alves G, VanGyseghem JM, Spitsbergen JM, GDNF to the rescue: GDNF delivery effects on motor neurons and nerves, and muscle re-innervation after peripheral nerve injuries, Neural Regeneration Research 17(4) (2022) 748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Paveliev M, Airaksinen MS, Saarma M, GDNF family ligands activate multiple events during axonal growth in mature sensory neurons, Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience 25(3) (2004) 453–459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].Zhao Z, Alam S, Oppenheim RW, Prevette DM, Evenson A, Parsadanian A, Overexpression of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor in the CNS rescues motoneurons from programmed cell death and promotes their long-term survival following axotomy, Experimental neurology 190(2) (2004) 356–372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Höke A, Ho T, Crawford TO, LeBel C, Hilt D, Griffin JW, Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor alters axon schwann cell units and promotes myelination in unmyelinated nerve fibers, Journal of Neuroscience 23(2) (2003) 561–567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Haase G, Dessaud E, Garcès A, de Bovis B, Birling M-C, Filippi P, Schmalbruch H, Arber S, delapeyriere O, GDNF acts through PEA3 to regulate cell body positioning and muscle innervation of specific motor neuron pools, neuron 35(5) (2002) 893–905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [45].López-Erauskin J, Fourcade S, Galino J, Ruiz M, Schlüter A, Naudi A, Jove M, Portero-Otin M, Pamplona R, Ferrer I, Antioxidants halt axonal degeneration in a mouse model of X-adrenoleukodystrophy, Annals of neurology 70(1) (2011) 84–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [46].Conforti L, Gilley J, Coleman MP, Wallerian degeneration: an emerging axon death pathway linking injury and disease, Nature Reviews Neuroscience 15(6) (2014) 394–409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [47].Canton M, Sánchez-Rodríguez R, Spera I, Venegas FC, Favia M, Viola A, Castegna A, Reactive oxygen species in macrophages: sources and targets, Frontiers in Immunology 12 (2021) 734229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [48].Bergamini CM, Gambetti S, Dondi A, Cervellati C, Oxygen, reactive oxygen species and tissue damage, Current pharmaceutical design 10(14) (2004) 1611–1626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [49].Thannickal VJ, Fanburg BL, Reactive oxygen species in cell signaling, American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology 279(6) (2000) L1005–L1028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [50].Mohsin M, Shams F, Li H, Alam A, Xia C, Fan L, Cao Y, Jiang W, Nasir A, Khan S, Bai Q, Nanozymes in neuropathic pain: strategies bridging oxidative stress, mitochondrial repair, and neuroimmune modulation for targeted therapy, Journal of Neuroinflammation 22(1) (2025) 156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [51].Friedman J, Why is the nervous system vulnerable to oxidative stress?, Oxidative stress and free radical damage in neurology (2011) 19–27. [Google Scholar]
  • [52].Zhang J, Wang X, Vikash V, Ye Q, Wu D, Liu Y, Dong W, ROS and ROS-mediated cellular signaling, Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity 2016 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [53].Cao X, Fang Y, Transducing oxidative stress to death signals in neurons, The Journal of Cell Biology 211(4) (2015) 741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [54].Wakatsuki S, Furuno A, Ohshima M, Araki T, Oxidative stress–dependent phosphorylation activates ZNRF1 to induce neuronal/axonal degeneration, Journal of Cell Biology 211(4) (2015) 881–896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [55].Wakatsuki S, Araki T, Novel insights into the mechanism of reactive oxygen species-mediated neurodegeneration, Neural Regeneration Research 18(4) (2023) 746–749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [56].Cadiz Diaz A, Schmidt NA, Yamazaki M, Hsieh C-J, Lisse TS, Rieger S, Coordinated NADPH oxidase/hydrogen peroxide functions regulate cutaneous sensory axon de-and regeneration, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119(30) (2022) e2115009119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [57].Hervera A, De Virgiliis F, Palmisano I, Zhou L, Tantardini E, Kong G, Hutson T, Danzi MC, Perry RB-T, Santos CX, Reactive oxygen species regulate axonal regeneration through the release of exosomal NADPH oxidase 2 complexes into injured axons, Nature cell biology 20(3) (2018) 307–319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [58].Negro S, Lauria F, Stazi M, Tebaldi T, D’Este G, Pirazzini M, Megighian A, Lessi F, Mazzanti CM, Sales G, Hydrogen peroxide induced by nerve injury promotes axon regeneration via connective tissue growth factor, Acta Neuropathologica Communications 10(1) (2022) 189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [59].Circu ML, Aw TY, Reactive oxygen species, cellular redox systems, and apoptosis, Free Radic Biol Med 48(6) (2010) 749–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [60].Ji YZ, Lin ZH, Liao CX, Wang Q, Chen FY, Su WF, Zhao YY, Chen G, Wei ZY, Inhibition of Macrophage Activation by Minocycline Attenuates CCI-Induced Neuropathic Pain, Inflammation (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [61].Zheng X, Wang J, Zhou H, Chai Y, Li Z, Chen M, Yang Z, Xu C, Lei C, He Y, Zou D, Ye Q, Dental pulp stem cells alleviate Schwann cell pyroptosis via mitochondrial transfer to enhance facial nerve regeneration, Bioact Mater 47 (2025) 313–326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [62].Jiang Q, Pan M, Hu J, Sun J, Fan L, Zou Z, Wei J, Yang X, Liu X, Regulation of redox balance using a biocompatible nanoplatform enhances phototherapy efficacy and suppresses tumor metastasis, Chem Sci 12(1) (2020) 148–157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [63].Jang WY, Kim MY, Cho JY, Antioxidant, Anti-Inflammatory, Anti-Menopausal, and Anti-Cancer Effects of Lignans and Their Metabolites, Int J Mol Sci 23(24) (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [64].Ko SH, Cho KA, Li X, Ran Q, Liu Z, Chen L, GPX modulation promotes regenerative axonal fusion and functional recovery after injury through PSR-1 condensation, Nat Commun 16(1) (2025) 1079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [65].Meacham K, Shepherd A, Mohapatra DP, Haroutounian S, Neuropathic pain: central vs. peripheral mechanisms, Current pain and headache reports 21 (2017) 1–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [66].Cohen SP, Mao J, Neuropathic pain: mechanisms and their clinical implications, Bmj 348 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [67].Calvo M, Dawes JM, Bennett DL, The role of the immune system in the generation of neuropathic pain, The lancet neurology 11(7) (2012) 629–642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [68].Jager SE, Pallesen LT, Richner M, Harley P, Hore Z, McMahon S, Denk F, Vaegter CB, Changes in the transcriptional fingerprint of satellite glial cells following peripheral nerve injury, Glia 68(7) (2020) 1375–1395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [69].Yu X, Liu H, Hamel KA, Morvan MG, Yu S, Leff J, Guan Z, Braz JM, Basbaum AI, Dorsal root ganglion macrophages contribute to both the initiation and persistence of neuropathic pain, Nature communications 11(1) (2020) 264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [70].Kwon MJ, Shin HY, Cui Y, Kim H, Le Thi AH, Choi JY, Kim EY, Hwang DH, Kim BG, CCL2 mediates neuron–macrophage interactions to drive proregenerative macrophage activation following preconditioning injury, Journal of Neuroscience 35(48) (2015) 15934–15947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [71].Bhattacharya A, Wickenden AD, Chaplan SR, Sodium channel blockers for the treatment of neuropathic pain, Neurotherapeutics 6(4) (2009) 663–678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [72].Dib-Hajj SD, Waxman SG, Translational pain research: Lessons from genetics and genomics, Science translational medicine 6(249) (2014) 249sr4–249sr4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [73].Liu L, Yang T, Liedtke W, Simon S, Chronic IL-1β signaling potentiates voltage-dependent sodium currents in trigeminal nociceptive neurons, Journal of neurophysiology 95(3) (2006) 1478–1490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [74].Amaya F, Wang H, Costigan M, Allchorne AJ, Hatcher JP, Egerton J, Stean T, Morisset V, Grose D, Gunthorpe MJ, The voltage-gated sodium channel Nav1. 9 is an effector of peripheral inflammatory pain hypersensitivity, Journal of Neuroscience 26(50) (2006) 12852–12860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [75].Binshtok AM, Wang H, Zimmermann K, Amaya F, Vardeh D, Shi L, Brenner GJ, Ji R-R, Bean BP, Woolf CJ, Nociceptors are interleukin-1β sensors, Journal of Neuroscience 28(52) (2008) 14062–14073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [76].Gudes S, Barkai O, Caspi Y, Katz B, Lev S, Binshtok AM, The role of slow and persistent TTX-resistant sodium currents in acute tumor necrosis factor-α-mediated increase in nociceptors excitability, Journal of Neurophysiology 113(2) (2015) 601–619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [77].Jin X, Gereau RW, Acute p38-mediated modulation of tetrodotoxin-resistant sodium channels in mouse sensory neurons by tumor necrosis factor-α, Journal of Neuroscience 26(1) (2006) 246–255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [78].Marwaha L, Bansal Y, Singh R, Saroj P, Bhandari R, Kuhad A, TRP channels: potential drug target for neuropathic pain, Inflammopharmacology 24 (2016) 305–317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [79].Malsch P, Andratsch M, Vogl C, Link AS, Alzheimer C, Brierley SM, Hughes PA, Kress M, Deletion of interleukin-6 signal transducer gp130 in small sensory neurons attenuates mechanonociception and down-regulates TRPA1 expression, Journal of Neuroscience 34(30) (2014) 9845–9856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [80].Fang D, Kong L-Y, Cai J, Li S, Liu X-D, Han J-S, Xing G-G, Interleukin-6-mediated functional upregulation of TRPV1 receptors in dorsal root ganglion neurons through the activation of JAK/PI3K signaling pathway: roles in the development of bone cancer pain in a rat model, Pain 156(6) (2015) 1124–1144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [81].Meng J, Wang J, Steinhoff M, Dolly JO, TNFα induces co-trafficking of TRPV1/TRPA1 in VAMP1-containing vesicles to the plasmalemma via Munc18–1/syntaxin1/SNAP-25 mediated fusion, Scientific reports 6(1) (2016) 1–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [82].Nicol GD, Lopshire JC, Pafford CM, Tumor necrosis factor enhances the capsaicin sensitivity of rat sensory neurons, Journal of Neuroscience 17(3) (1997) 975–982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [83].Kao D-J, Li AH, Chen J-C, Luo R-S, Chen Y-L, Lu J-C, Wang H-L, CC chemokine ligand 2 upregulates the current density and expression of TRPV1 channels and Nav1. 8 sodium channels in dorsal root ganglion neurons, Journal of neuroinflammation 9(1) (2012) 1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [84].Kallenborn-Gerhardt W, Lu R, Syhr KM, Heidler J, von Melchner H, Geisslinger G, Bangsow T, Schmidtko A, Antioxidant activity of sestrin 2 controls neuropathic pain after peripheral nerve injury, Antioxid Redox Signal 19(17) (2013) 2013–2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [85].Berger JV, Deumens R, Goursaud S.p., Schäfer S, Lavand’homme P, Joosten EA, Hermans E, Enhanced neuroinflammation and pain hypersensitivity after peripheral nerve injury in rats expressing mutated superoxide dismutase 1, Journal of neuroinflammation 8 (2011) 1–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [86].Andersson DA, Gentry C, Moss S, Bevan S, Transient receptor potential A1 is a sensory receptor for multiple products of oxidative stress, Journal of Neuroscience 28(10) (2008) 2485–2494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [87].Liu B, Tai Y, Caceres AI, Achanta S, Balakrishna S, Shao X, Fang J, Jordt S-E, Oxidized phospholipid OxPAPC activates TRPA1 and contributes to chronic inflammatory pain in mice, PLoS One 11(11) (2016) e0165200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [88].Lorenz JE, Kallenborn-Gerhardt W, Lu R, Syhr KM, Eaton P, Geisslinger G, Schmidtko A, Oxidant-induced activation of cGMP-dependent protein kinase Iα mediates neuropathic pain after peripheral nerve injury, Antioxid Redox Signal 21(10) (2014) 1504–1515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [89].Echeverry S, Shi XQ, Rivest S, Zhang J, Peripheral nerve injury alters blood-spinal cord barrier functional and molecular integrity through a selective inflammatory pathway, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 31(30) (2011) 10819–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [90].Clark AK, Yip PK, Grist J, Gentry C, Staniland AA, Marchand F, Dehvari M, Wotherspoon G, Winter J, Ullah J, Inhibition of spinal microglial cathepsin S for the reversal of neuropathic pain, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104(25) (2007) 10655–10660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [91].Guan Z, Kuhn JA, Wang X, Colquitt B, Solorzano C, Vaman S, Guan AK, Evans-Reinsch Z, Braz J, Devor M, Injured sensory neuron–derived CSF1 induces microglial proliferation and DAP12-dependent pain, Nature neuroscience 19(1) (2016) 94–101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [92].Jung H, Bhangoo S, Banisadr G, Freitag C, Ren D, White FA, Miller RJ, Visualization of chemokine receptor activation in transgenic mice reveals peripheral activation of CCR2 receptors in states of neuropathic pain, Journal of Neuroscience 29(25) (2009) 8051–8062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [93].Matejuk A, Ransohoff RM, Crosstalk between astrocytes and microglia: an overview, Frontiers in immunology 11 (2020) 1416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [94].Ji R-R, Berta T, Nedergaard M, Glia and pain: is chronic pain a gliopathy?, Pain 154 Suppl 1(0 1) (2013) S10–S28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [95].Ji R-R, Xu Z-Z, Gao Y-J, Emerging targets in neuroinflammation-driven chronic pain, Nature reviews Drug discovery 13(7) (2014) 533–548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [96].Kallenborn-Gerhardt W, Schröder K, Schmidtko A, NADPH oxidases in pain processing, Antioxidants 11(6) (2022) 1162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [97].Bae C, Wang J, Shim HS, Tang S-J, Chung JM, La J-H, Mitochondrial superoxide increases excitatory synaptic strength in spinal dorsal horn neurons of neuropathic mice, Molecular pain 14 (2018) 1744806918797032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [98].Kim D, You B, Jo E-K, Han S-K, Simon MI, Lee SJ, NADPH oxidase 2-derived reactive oxygen species in spinal cord microglia contribute to peripheral nerve injury-induced neuropathic pain, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107(33) (2010) 14851–14856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [99].Choi S-R, Roh D-H, Yoon S-Y, Kang S-Y, Moon J-Y, Kwon S-G, Choi H-S, Han H-J, Beitz AJ, Oh S-B, Spinal sigma-1 receptors activate NADPH oxidase 2 leading to the induction of pain hypersensitivity in mice and mechanical allodynia in neuropathic rats, Pharmacological research 74 (2013) 56–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [100].Bourne S, Machado AG, Nagel SJ, Basic anatomy and physiology of pain pathways, Neurosurgery clinics of North America 25(4) (2014) 629–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [101].Apkarian AV, Bushnell MC, Treede R-D, Zubieta J-K, Human brain mechanisms of pain perception and regulation in health and disease, European journal of pain 9(4) (2005) 463–484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [102].Bak MS, Park H, Kim SK, Neural plasticity in the brain during neuropathic pain, Biomedicines 9(6) (2021) 624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [103].Seminowicz DA, Laferriere AL, Millecamps M, Jon S, Coderre TJ, Bushnell MC, MRI structural brain changes associated with sensory and emotional function in a rat model of long-term neuropathic pain, Neuroimage 47(3) (2009) 1007–1014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [104].Taylor KS, Anastakis DJ, Davis KD, Cutting your nerve changes your brain, Brain 132(11) (2009) 3122–3133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [105].Taylor KS, Anastakis DJ, Davis KD, Chronic pain and sensorimotor deficits following peripheral nerve injury, PAIN® 151(3) (2010) 582–591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [106].Zhao P, Waxman SG, Hains BC, Sodium channel expression in the ventral posterolateral nucleus of the thalamus after peripheral nerve injury, Molecular Pain 2 (2006) 1744-8069-2-27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [107].Todorovic SM, Jevtovic-Todorovic V, T-type voltage-gated calcium channels as targets for the development of novel pain therapies, Br J Pharmacol 163(3) (2011) 484–495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [108].Ralston HJ III, Ohara PT, Meng XW, Wells J, Ralston DD, Transneuronal changes of the inhibitory circuitry in the macaque somatosensory thalamus following lesions of the dorsal column nuclei, Journal of Comparative Neurology 371(2) (1996) 325–335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [109].Peyron R, Schneider F, Faillenot I, Convers P, Barral F-G, Garcia-Larrea L, Laurent B, An fMRI study of cortical representation of mechanical allodynia in patients with neuropathic pain, Neurology 63(10) (2004) 1838–1846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [110].Wei J.-a., Hu X, Zhang B, Liu L, Chen K, So K-F, Li M, Zhang L, Electroacupuncture activates inhibitory neural circuits in the somatosensory cortex to relieve neuropathic pain, Iscience 24(2) (2021) 102066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [111].Tsuda M, Koga K, Chen T, Zhuo M, Neuronal and microglial mechanisms for neuropathic pain in the spinal dorsal horn and anterior cingulate cortex, Journal of neurochemistry 141(4) (2017) 486–498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [112].Heinricher MM, Tavares I, Leith JL, Lumb BM, Descending control of nociception: Specificity, recruitment and plasticity, Brain research reviews 60(1) (2009) 214–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [113].Ho YC, Cheng JK, Chiou LC, Hypofunction of glutamatergic neurotransmission in the periaqueductal gray contributes to nerve-injury-induced neuropathic pain, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 33(18) (2013) 7825–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [114].Mor D, Bembrick AL, Austin PJ, Wyllie PM, Creber NJ, Denyer GS, Keay KA, Anatomically specific patterns of glial activation in the periaqueductal gray of the sub-population of rats showing pain and disability following chronic constriction injury of the sciatic nerve, Neuroscience 166(4) (2010) 1167–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [115].Kim YS, Chu Y, Han L, Li M, Li Z, LaVinka PC, Sun S, Tang Z, Park K, Caterina MJ, Ren K, Dubner R, Wei F, Dong X, Central terminal sensitization of TRPV1 by descending serotonergic facilitation modulates chronic pain, Neuron 81(4) (2014) 873–887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [116].Ossipov MH, Morimura K, Porreca F, Descending pain modulation and chronification of pain, Current opinion in supportive and palliative care 8(2) (2014) 143–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [117].Peters S, Page MJ, Coppieters MW, Ross M, Johnston V, Rehabilitation following carpal tunnel release, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2) (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [118].Braun RM, Rechnic M, Fowler E, Complications related to carpal tunnel release, Hand clinics 18(2) (2002) 347–357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [119].Gerritsen A, Uitdehaag B, Van Geldere D, Scholten R, De Vet H, Bouter L, Systematic review of randomized clinical trials of surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome, British Journal of surgery 88(10) (2001) 1285–1295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [120].Li R, Liu Z, Pan Y, Chen L, Zhang Z, Lu L, Peripheral nerve injuries treatment: a systematic review, Cell biochemistry and biophysics 68 (2014) 449–454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [121].Barnes SL, Miller TA, Simon NG, Traumatic peripheral nerve injuries: diagnosis and management, Current Opinion in Neurology 35(6) (2022) 718–727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [122].Konofaos P, Ver Halen J, Nerve repair by means of tubulization: past, present, future, Journal of reconstructive microsurgery 29(03) (2013) 149–164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [123].Kehoe S, Zhang X, Boyd D, FDA approved guidance conduits and wraps for peripheral nerve injury: a review of materials and efficacy, Injury 43(5) (2012) 553–572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [124].Cavalli L, Arcangeli ME, Paladini A, Riccioni R, Lazzeri G, Importance of motor rehabilitation (RIC) in medullary lesions in chronic phase, Surg. Case Rep. Rev 3 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • [125].Ballestero-Pérez R, Plaza-Manzano G, Urraca-Gesto A, Romo-Romo F, de los Ángeles Atín-Arratibel M, Pecos-Martín D, Gallego-Izquierdo T, Romero-Franco N, Effectiveness of nerve gliding exercises on carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics 40(1) (2017) 50–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [126].Monsivais JJ, Contralateral C7 transfers: an innovative approach to improving peripheral neuropathic pain after traumatic brachial plexus injury with C5 rupture and avulsion of C6, C7, C8 and T1. A case series study, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 191 (2020) 105693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [127].Chagas A.C.d.S., Wanderley D, Barboza PJM, Martins JVP, de Moraes AA, de Souza FHM, de Oliveira DA, Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation compared to conventional physiotherapy for adults with traumatic upper brachial plexus injury: a protocol for a randomized clinical trial, Physiotherapy Research International 26(1) (2021) e1873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [128].Maugeri G, D’Agata V, Trovato B, Roggio F, Castorina A, Vecchio M, Di Rosa M, Musumeci G, The role of exercise on peripheral nerve regeneration: from animal model to clinical application, Heliyon (2021) e08281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [129].Sabatier MJ, Redmon N, Schwartz G, English AW, Treadmill training promotes axon regeneration in injured peripheral nerves, Experimental neurology 211(2) (2008) 489–493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [130].Teodori RM, Betini J, de Oliveira LS, Sobral LL, Takeda SYM, Montebelo M.I.d.L., Swimming exercise in the acute or late phase after sciatic nerve crush accelerates nerve regeneration, Neural plasticity 2011 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [131].Brandt J, Evans JT, Mildenhall T, Mulligan A, Konieczny A, Rose SJ, English AW, Delaying the onset of treadmill exercise following peripheral nerve injury has different effects on axon regeneration and motoneuron synaptic plasticity, Journal of neurophysiology 113(7) (2015) 2390–2399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [132].Wood K, Wilhelm JC, Sabatier MJ, Liu K, Gu J, English AW, Sex differences in the effectiveness of treadmill training in enhancing axon regeneration in injured peripheral nerves, Developmental neurobiology 72(5) (2012) 688–698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [133].Kong Y, Kuss M, Shi Y, Fang F, Xue W, Shi W, Liu Y, Zhang C, Zhong P, Duan B, Exercise facilitates regeneration after severe nerve transection and further modulates neural plasticity, Brain, Behavior, & Immunity-Health 26 (2022) 100556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [134].Paula MH, Barbosa RI, Marcolino AM, Elui VM, Rosen B, Fonseca MC, Early sensory re-education of the hand after peripheral nerve repair based on mirror therapy: a randomized controlled trial, Braz J Phys Ther 20(1) (2016) 58–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [135].Horng YS, Hsieh SF, Tu YK, Lin MC, Horng YS, Wang JD, The comparative effectiveness of tendon and nerve gliding exercises in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized trial, Am J Phys Med Rehabil 90(6) (2011) 435–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [136].Rich JA, Newell A, Williams T, Traumatic brachial plexus injury rehabilitation using neuromuscular electrical muscle stimulation in a polytrauma patient, BMJ Case Rep 12(12) (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [137].Natroshvili T, van de Warenburg MS, Heine EP, Slater NJ, Walbeehm ET, Bartels R, Conservative Treatment of Ulnar Nerve Compression at the Elbow: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, Arch Plast Surg 50(1) (2023) 70–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [138].Lopez-Alvarez VM, Modol L, Navarro X, Cobianchi S, Early increasing-intensity treadmill exercise reduces neuropathic pain by preventing nociceptor collateral sprouting and disruption of chloride cotransporters homeostasis after peripheral nerve injury, Pain 156(9) (2015) 1812–1825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [139].Tian T, Moore AM, Ghareeb PA, Boulis NM, Ward PJ, A Perspective on Electrical Stimulation and Sympathetic Regeneration in Peripheral Nerve Injuries, Neurotrauma Rep 5(1) (2024) 172–180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [140].Mattos E, Guedes A, Lessa PIF, Baptista AF, Influence of surface peripheral electrical stimulation on nerve regeneration after digital nerve neurorrhaphy: study protocol for a randomized clinical trial, F1000Res 10 (2021) 219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [141].Johnson S, Marshall A, Hughes D, Holmes E, Henrich F, Nurmikko T, Sharma M, Frank B, Bassett P, Marshall A, Magerl W, Goebel A, Mechanistically informed non-invasive peripheral nerve stimulation for peripheral neuropathic pain: a randomised double-blind sham-controlled trial, Journal of Translational Medicine 19(1) (2021) 458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [142].Ahn HY, Walters JB, Avila R, Oh S, Seo SG, Kim JU, Park J, Yoo S, Choi YS, Kim TY, Liu J, Yoo JY, Weissleder OR, D’Andrea D, Park C, Lee G, Cho D, Maeng WY, Yoon HJ, Wickerson G, Bouricha Y, Tian J, Chung TC, Jordan SW, Li S, Huang Y, Franz CK, Rogers JA, Bioresorbable, wireless dual stimulator for peripheral nerve regeneration, Nat Commun 16(1) (2025) 4752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [143].Wang D, He W, Dong C, Xiong Z, Zhao R, Deng X, Tang Y, Ge Z, Fang Q, Ao D, Zhang C, Liu W, Xie H, Ye L, Lin W, Zhao X, Wang G, Reconstruction of Joint-Associated Peripheral Nerve Defects Using Novel Piezoelectric Spiral-Structured Poly(Lactic Acid) Fiber Conduits: Regeneration Efficacy and Mechanistic Insights, Advanced Functional Materials n/a(n/a) e10552. [Google Scholar]
  • [144].Cobianchi S, Arbat-Plana A, M Lopez-Alvarez V, Navarro X, Neuroprotective effects of exercise treatments after injury: the dual role of neurotrophic factors, Current neuropharmacology 15(4) (2017) 495–518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [145].Park J-S, Höke A, Treadmill exercise induced functional recovery after peripheral nerve repair is associated with increased levels of neurotrophic factors, PloS one 9(3) (2014) e90245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [146].Khan N, Smith MT, Neurotrophins and neuropathic pain: role in pathobiology, Molecules 20(6) (2015) 10657–10688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [147].Byun Y, Lee M, Kim S, Kim H, Treadmill running promotes functional recovery and decreases brain-derived neurotrophic factor mRNA expression following sciatic crushed nerve injury in rats, Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness 45(2) (2005) 222. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [148].Cobianchi S, Casals-Diaz L, Jaramillo J, Navarro X, Differential effects of activity dependent treatments on axonal regeneration and neuropathic pain after peripheral nerve injury, Experimental neurology 240 (2013) 157–167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [149].López-Álvarez VM, Modol L, Navarro X, Cobianchi S, Early increasing-intensity treadmill exercise reduces neuropathic pain by preventing nociceptor collateral sprouting and disruption of chloride cotransporters homeostasis after peripheral nerve injury, Pain 156(9) (2015) 1812–1825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [150].Cobianchi S, Marinelli S, Florenzano F, Pavone F, Luvisetto S, Short-but not long-lasting treadmill running reduces allodynia and improves functional recovery after peripheral nerve injury, Neuroscience 168(1) (2010) 273–287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [151].Lopez-Alvarez VM, Puigdomenech M, Navarro X, Cobianchi S, Monoaminergic descending pathways contribute to modulation of neuropathic pain by increasing-intensity treadmill exercise after peripheral nerve injury, Experimental neurology 299 (2018) 42–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [152].Power HA, Morhart MJ, Olson JL, Chan KM, Postsurgical electrical stimulation enhances recovery following surgery for severe cubital tunnel syndrome: a double-blind randomized controlled trial, Neurosurgery 86(6) (2020) 769–777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [153].Gordon T, Amirjani N, Edwards DC, Chan KM, Brief post-surgical electrical stimulation accelerates axon regeneration and muscle reinnervation without affecting the functional measures in carpal tunnel syndrome patients, Experimental neurology 223(1) (2010) 192–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [154].Wong JN, Olson JL, Morhart MJ, Chan KM, Electrical stimulation enhances sensory recovery: a randomized controlled trial, Annals of neurology 77(6) (2015) 996–1006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [155].Chu X-L, Song X-Z, Li Q, Li Y-R, He F, Gu X-S, Ming D, Basic mechanisms of peripheral nerve injury and treatment via electrical stimulation, Neural regeneration research 17(10) (2022) 2185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [156].Al-Majed AA, Brushart TM, Gordon T, Electrical stimulation accelerates and increases expression of BDNF and trkB mRNA in regenerating rat femoral motoneurons, European Journal of Neuroscience 12(12) (2000) 4381–4390. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [157].Hu M, Hong L, Liu C, Hong S, He S, Zhou M, Huang G, Chen Q, Electrical stimulation enhances neuronal cell activity mediated by Schwann cell derived exosomes, Scientific reports 9(1) (2019) 4206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [158].Willand MP, Rosa E, Michalski B, Zhang JJ, Gordon T, Fahnestock M, Borschel GH, Electrical muscle stimulation elevates intramuscular BDNF and GDNF mRNA following peripheral nerve injury and repair in rats, Neuroscience 334 (2016) 93–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [159].Di Filippo ES, Mancinelli R, Marrone M, Doria C, Verratti V, Toniolo L, Dantas JL, Fulle S, Pietrangelo T, Neuromuscular electrical stimulation improves skeletal muscle regeneration through satellite cell fusion with myofibers in healthy elderly subjects, Journal of Applied Physiology 123(3) (2017) 501–512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [160].Kalra A, Urban M, Sluka K, Blockade of opioid receptors in rostral ventral medulla prevents antihyperalgesia produced by transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 298(1) (2001) 257–263. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [161].Radhakrishnan R, King EW, Dickman JK, Herold CA, Johnston NF, Spurgin ML, Sluka KA, Spinal 5-HT2 and 5-HT3 receptors mediate low, but not high, frequency TENS-induced antihyperalgesia in rats, Pain 105(1–2) (2003) 205–213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [162].Sluka KA, Lisi TL, Westlund KN, Increased release of serotonin in the spinal cord during low, but not high, frequency transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation in rats with joint inflammation, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 87(8) (2006) 1137–1140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [163].Maeda Y, Lisi T, Vance C, Sluka K, Release of GABA and activation of GABAA in the spinal cord mediates the effects of TENS in rats, Brain research 1136 (2007) 43–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [164].Ladenbauer J, Minassian K, Hofstoetter US, Dimitrijevic MR, Rattay F, Stimulation of the human lumbar spinal cord with implanted and surface electrodes: a computer simulation study, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 18(6) (2010) 637–645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [165].Pei B.-a., Zi J.-h., Wu L.-s., Zhang C.-h., Chen Y.-z., Pulsed electrical stimulation protects neurons in the dorsal root and anterior horn of the spinal cord after peripheral nerve injury, Neural Regeneration Research 10(10) (2015) 1650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [166].Tilley DM, Cedeño DL, Kelley CA, DeMaegd M, Benyamin R, Vallejo R, Changes in dorsal root ganglion gene expression in response to spinal cord stimulation, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 42(2) (2017) 246–251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [167].Shinoda M, Fujita S, Sugawara S, Asano S, Koyama R, Fujiwara S, Soma K, Tamagawa T, Matsui T, Ikutame D, Suppression of superficial microglial activation by spinal cord stimulation attenuates neuropathic pain following sciatic nerve injury in rats, International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21(7) (2020) 2390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [168].Mattson MP, Excitotoxic and excitoprotective mechanisms: abundant targets for the prevention and treatment of neurodegenerative disorders, Neuromolecular medicine 3 (2003) 65–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [169].Murray PS, Holmes PV, An overview of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and implications for excitotoxic vulnerability in the hippocampus, International journal of peptides 2011 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [170].Hesampour F, Tshikudi DM, Bernstein CN, Ghia JE, Exploring the efficacy of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) in modulating local and systemic inflammation in experimental models of colitis, Bioelectron Med 10(1) (2024) 29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [171].Pikov V, Vagus Nerve Stimulation and Sacral Nerve Stimulation for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review, Journal of Translational Gastroenterology 1(2) (2023) 94–100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [172].Drewes AM, Brock C, Rasmussen SE, Moller HJ, Brock B, Deleuran BW, Farmer AD, Pfeiffer-Jensen M, Short-term transcutaneous non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation may reduce disease activity and pro-inflammatory cytokines in rheumatoid arthritis: results of a pilot study, Scand J Rheumatol 50(1) (2021) 20–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [173].Huguenard AL, Tan G, Rivet DJ, Gao F, Johnson GW, Adamek M, Coxon AT, Kummer TT, Osbun JW, Vellimana AK, Limbrick DD, Zipfel GJ, Brunner P, Leuthardt EC, Auricular vagus nerve stimulation for mitigation of inflammation and vasospasm in subarachnoid hemorrhage: a single-institution randomized controlled trial, J Neurosurg (2025) 1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [174].Young C, Miller E, Nicklous DM, Hoffman JR, Nerve growth factor and neurotrophin-3 affect functional recovery following peripheral nerve injury differently, Restorative neurology and neuroscience 18(4) (2001) 167–175. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [175].Hontanilla B, Aubá C, Gorría O, Nerve regeneration through nerve autografts after local administration of brain-derived neurotrophic factor with osmotic pumps, Neurosurgery 61(6) (2007) 1268–1275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [176].Kryger GS, Kryger Z, Zhang F, Shelton DL, Lineaweaver WC, Buncke HJ, Nerve growth factor inhibition prevents traumatic neuroma formation in the rat, The Journal of hand surgery 26(4) (2001) 635–644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [177].Averill S, Michael GJ, Shortland PJ, Leavesley RC, King VR, Bradbury EJ, McMahon SB, Priestley JV, NGF and GDNF ameliorate the increase in ATF3 expression which occurs in dorsal root ganglion cells in response to peripheral nerve injury, European Journal of Neuroscience 19(6) (2004) 1437–1445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [178].Chaiyasate K, Schaffner A, Jackson IT, Mittal V, Comparing FK-506 with basic fibroblast growth factor (b-FGF) on the repair of a peripheral nerve defect using an autogenous vein bridge model, Journal of Investigative Surgery 22(6) (2009) 401–405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [179].Ramburrun P, Kumar P, Choonara YE, Bijukumar D, du Toit LC, Pillay V, A review of bioactive release from nerve conduits as a neurotherapeutic strategy for neuronal growth in peripheral nerve injury, BioMed research international 2014 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [180].Lewin SL, Utley DS, Cheng ET, Verity AN, Terris DJ, Simultaneous treatment with BDNF and CNTF after peripheral nerve transection and repair enhances rate of functional recovery compared with BDNF treatment alone, The Laryngoscope 107(7) (1997) 992–999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [181].Cao X, Shoichet M, Investigating the synergistic effect of combined neurotrophic factor concentration gradients to guide axonal growth, Neuroscience 122(2) (2003) 381–389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [182].Madduri S, Feldman K, Tervoort T, Papaloïzos M, Gander B, Collagen nerve conduits releasing the neurotrophic factors GDNF and NGF, Journal of Controlled Release 143(2) (2010) 168–174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [183].Catrina S, Gander B, Madduri S, Nerve conduit scaffolds for discrete delivery of two neurotrophic factors, European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics 85(1) (2013) 139–142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [184].Boyd J, Gordon T, A dose-dependent facilitation and inhibition of peripheral nerve regeneration by brain-derived neurotrophic factor, European Journal of Neuroscience 15(4) (2002) 613–626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [185].Eggers R, de Winter F, Hoyng SA, Roet KC, Ehlert EM, Malessy MJ, Verhaagen J, Tannemaat MR, Lentiviral vector-mediated gradients of GDNF in the injured peripheral nerve: effects on nerve coil formation, Schwann cell maturation and myelination, PLoS One 8(8) (2013) e71076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [186].Yang K, Wang Y, Li Y.-w., Chen Y.-g., Xing N, Lin H.-b., Zhou P, Yu X.-p., Progress in the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy, Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 148 (2022) 112717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [187].Sisignano M, Baron R, Scholich K, Geisslinger G, Mechanism-based treatment for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathic pain, Nature Reviews Neurology 10(12) (2014) 694–707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [188].Yildiran H, Macit MS, Özata Uyar G, New approach to peripheral nerve injury: nutritional therapy, Nutritional neuroscience 23(10) (2020) 744–755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [189].Abbaszadeh A, Darabi S, Hasanvand A, Amini-Khoei H, Abbasnezhad A, Choghakhori R, Aaliehpour A, Minocycline through attenuation of oxidative stress and inflammatory response reduces the neuropathic pain in a rat model of chronic constriction injury, Iranian journal of basic medical sciences 21(2) (2018) 138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [190].Li Y, Zhang Z, Xu K, Du S, Gu X, Cao R, Cui S, Minocycline alleviates peripheral nerve adhesion by promoting regulatory macrophage polarization via the TAK1 and its downstream pathway, Life Sciences 276 (2021) 119422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [191].Mohammadi-Abisofla S, Behnam-Rassouli M, Mousavinezhad M, Mahdavi-Shahri N, O6: Protective Effect of Alpha-Lipoic Acid on Neuronal Degeneration Due to Sciatic Nerve Transection in Rat, The Neuroscience Journal of Shefaye Khatam 6(2) (2018) 6–6. [Google Scholar]
  • [192].Senoglu M, Nacitarhan V, Belge Kurutas E, Senoglu N, Altun I, Atli Y, Ozbag D, Intraperitoneal Alpha-Lipoic Acid to prevent neural damage after crush injury to the rat sciatic nerve, Journal of Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury 4(1) (2009) 22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [193].Yoo MC, Ryu IY, Choi JW, Lee JM, Byun JY, Yeo SG, Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase 2 expression and effects of alpha lipoic acid on recovery in a rat model of facial nerve injury, Biomedicines 10(2) (2022) 291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [194].Oktay KNK, Akpinar P, Ozkan FU, Aktas I, Canillioglu YE, Senturk GE, The effect of alpha lipoic acid on the recovery of sciatic nerve injury in rats: A prospective randomized controlled trial, American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 100(8) (2021) 780–789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [195].Monroy Guizar EA, Garcia Benavides L, Ambriz Plascencia AR, Pascoe Gonzalez S, Totsuka Sutto SE, Cardona Munoz EG, Mendez-del Villar M, Effect of alpha-lipoic acid on clinical and neurophysiologic recovery of carpal tunnel syndrome: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial, Journal of medicinal food 21(5) (2018) 521–526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [196].Noorafshan A, Omidi A, Karbalay-Doust S, Curcumin protects the dorsal root ganglion and sciatic nerve after crush in rat, Pathology, research and practice 207(9) (2011) 577–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [197].Xifró X, Vidal-Sancho L, Boadas-Vaello P, Turrado C, Alberch J, Puig T, Verdú E, Novel epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) derivative as a new therapeutic strategy for reducing neuropathic pain after chronic constriction nerve injury in mice, PLoS One 10(4) (2015) e0123122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [198].Kian K, Khalatbary AR, Ahmadvand H, Karimpour Malekshah A, Shams Z, Neuroprotective effects of (−)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) against peripheral nerve transection-induced apoptosis, Nutr Neurosci 22(8) (2019) 578–586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [199].Chen MM, Qin J, Chen SJ, Yao LM, Zhang LY, Yin ZQ, Liao H, Quercetin promotes motor and sensory function recovery following sciatic nerve-crush injury in C57BL/6J mice, The Journal of nutritional biochemistry 46 (2017) 57–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [200].El Soury M, Fornasari BE, Carta G, Zen F, Haastert-Talini K, Ronchi G, The role of dietary nutrients in peripheral nerve regeneration, International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22(14) (2021) 7417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [201].Boriani F, Granchi D, Roatti G, Merlini L, Sabattini T, Baldini N, Alpha-lipoic Acid After Median Nerve Decompression at the Carpal Tunnel: A Randomized Controlled Trial, J Hand Surg Am 42(4) (2017) 236–242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [202].Huang Y, Zhang X, Zou Y, Yuan Q, Xian YF, Lin ZX, Quercetin Ameliorates Neuropathic Pain after Brachial Plexus Avulsion via Suppressing Oxidative Damage through Inhibition of PKC/MAPK/ NOX Pathway, Curr Neuropharmacol 21(11) (2023) 2343–2361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [203].Moore TL, Bowley BGE, Shultz PL, Calderazzo SM, Shobin EJ, Uprety AR, Rosene DL, Moss MB, Oral curcumin supplementation improves fine motor function in the middle-aged rhesus monkey, Somatosens Mot Res 35(1) (2018) 1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [204].Song Y, Li D, Farrelly O, Miles L, Li F, Kim SE, Lo TY, Wang F, Li T, Thompson-Peer KL, Gong J, Murthy SE, Coste B, Yakubovich N, Patapoutian A, Xiang Y, Rompolas P, Jan LY, Jan YN, The Mechanosensitive Ion Channel Piezo Inhibits Axon Regeneration, Neuron 102(2) (2019) 373–389 e6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [205].Grohn H, Gillick BT, Tkac I, Bednarik P, Mascali D, Deelchand DK, Michaeli S, Meekins GD, Leffler-McCabe MJ, MacKinnon CD, Eberly LE, Mangia S, Influence of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Human Neurochemistry and Functional Connectivity: A Pilot MRI/MRS Study at 7 T, Front Neurosci 13 (2019) 1260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [206].Scott G, Zetterberg H, Jolly A, Cole JH, De Simoni S, Jenkins PO, Feeney C, Owen DR, Lingford-Hughes A, Howes O, Patel MC, Goldstone AP, Gunn RN, Blennow K, Matthews PM, Sharp DJ, Minocycline reduces chronic microglial activation after brain trauma but increases neurodegeneration, Brain 141(2) (2018) 459–471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [207].Sun LQ, Chen YY, Wang X, Li XJ, Xue B, Qu L, Zhang TT, Mu YM, Lu JM, The protective effect of alpha lipoic acid on Schwann cells exposed to constant or intermittent high glucose, Biochem Pharmacol 84(7) (2012) 961–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [208].Song EJ, Yoo YS, Nerve growth factor-induced neurite outgrowth is potentiated by stabilization of TrkA receptors, BMB Rep 44(3) (2011) 182–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [209].Eastman CL, D’Ambrosio R, Ganesh T, Modulating neuroinflammation and oxidative stress to prevent epilepsy and improve outcomes after traumatic brain injury, Neuropharmacology 172 (2020) 107907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [210].Capin JJ, Minick KI, Stevens-Lapsley JE, Snow GL, Woodfield D, Dibblee P, Brennan GP, Hunter SJ, Variation in Outcomes and Number of Visits Following Care Guideline Implementation: Part 2 of an Analysis of 12 355 Patients After Total Knee Arthroplasty, J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 53(3) (2023) 151–158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [211].Ciciriello AJ, Surnar B, Medy GD, Su X, Dhar S, Dumont CM, Biomaterial-targeted precision nanoparticle delivery to the injured spinal cord, Acta Biomaterialia 152 (2022) 532–545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [212].Escobar A, Reis RL, Oliveira JM, Nanoparticles for neurotrophic factor delivery in nerve guidance conduits for peripheral nerve repair, Nanomedicine (Lond) 17(7) (2022) 477–494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [213].Bellotti E, Schilling AL, Little SR, Decuzzi P, Injectable thermoresponsive hydrogels as drug delivery system for the treatment of central nervous system disorders: A review, Journal of Controlled Release 329 (2021) 16–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [214].Zhang Q, Jin G, Li L, Xu S, Zhao B, Rapamycin-loaded Poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid microspheres optimized by a quality by design approach for atherosclerosis therapy: Preparation, characterization, and in vitro evaluation, Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology 107 (2025) 106759. [Google Scholar]
  • [215].Hui JB, Silva JCH, Pelaez MC, Sevigny M, Venkatasubramani JP, Plumereau Q, Chahine M, Proulx CD, Sephton CF, Dutchak PA, NPRL2 Inhibition of mTORC1 Controls Sodium Channel Expression and Brain Amino Acid Homeostasis, eNeuro 9(2) (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [216].Chen YS, Chang JY, Cheng CY, Tsai FJ, Yao CH, Liu BS, An in vivo evaluation of a biodegradable genipin-cross-linked gelatin peripheral nerve guide conduit material, Biomaterials 26(18) (2005) 3911–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [217].Moya-Alvarado G, Tiburcio-Felix R, Ibáñez MR, Aguirre-Soto AA, Guerra MV, Wu C, Mobley WC, Perlson E, Bronfman FC, BDNF/TrkB signaling endosomes in axons coordinate CREB/mTOR activation and protein synthesis in the cell body to induce dendritic growth in cortical neurons, eLife 12 (2023) e77455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [218].Ko C-H, Shie M-Y, Lin J-H, Chen Y-W, Yao C-H, Chen Y-S, Biodegradable Bisvinyl Sulfonemethyl-crosslinked Gelatin Conduit Promotes Regeneration after Peripheral Nerve Injury in Adult Rats, Scientific Reports 7(1) (2017) 17489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [219].Liu H, Wen W, Hu M, Bi W, Chen L, Liu S, Chen P, Tan X, Chitosan conduits combined with nerve growth factor microspheres repair facial nerve defects, Neural Regen Res 8(33) (2013) 3139–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [220].Li M, Xu TM, Zhang DY, Zhang XM, Rao F, Zhan SZ, Ma M, Xiong C, Chen XF, Wang YH, Nerve growth factor-basic fibroblast growth factor poly-lactide co-glycolid sustained-release microspheres and the small gap sleeve bridging technique to repair peripheral nerve injury, Neural Regen Res 18(1) (2023) 162–169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [221].Lackington WA, Kočí Z, Alekseeva T, Hibbitts AJ, Kneafsey SL, Chen G, O’Brien FJ, Controlling the dose-dependent, synergistic and temporal effects of NGF and GDNF by encapsulation in PLGA microparticles for use in nerve guidance conduits for the repair of large peripheral nerve defects, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society 304 (2019) 51–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [222].Zhao Q, Li ZY, Zhang ZP, Mo ZY, Chen SJ, Xiang SY, Zhang QS, Xue M, Polylactic-co-glycolic acid microspheres containing three neurotrophic factors promote sciatic nerve repair after injury, Neural Regen Res 10(9) (2015) 1491–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [223].Ding T, Zhu C, Kou ZZ, Yin JB, Zhang T, Lu YC, Wang LY, Luo ZJ, Li YQ, Neural tissue engineering scaffold with sustained RAPA release relieves neuropathic pain in rats, Life Sci 112(1–2) (2014) 22–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [224].Fadia NB, Bliley JM, DiBernardo GA, Crammond DJ, Schilling BK, Sivak WN, Spiess AM, Washington KM, Waldner M, Liao HT, James IB, Minteer DM, Tompkins-Rhoades C, Cottrill AR, Kim DY, Schweizer R, Bourne DA, Panagis GE, Asher Schusterman M 2nd, Egro FM, Campwala IK, Simpson T, Weber DJ, Gause T 2nd, Brooker JE, Josyula T, Guevara AA, Repko AJ, Mahoney CM, Marra KG, Long-gap peripheral nerve repair through sustained release of a neurotrophic factor in nonhuman primates, Sci Transl Med 12(527) (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [225].Hanwright PJ, Qiu C, Rath J, Zhou Y, von Guionneau N, Sarhane KA, Harris TGW, Howard GP, Malapati H, Lan MJ, Reddy S, Hoke A, Mao HQ, Tuffaha SH, Sustained IGF-1 delivery ameliorates effects of chronic denervation and improves functional recovery after peripheral nerve injury and repair, Biomaterials 280 (2022) 121244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [226].Chang YC, Chen MH, Liao SY, Wu HC, Kuan CH, Sun JS, Wang TW, Multichanneled Nerve Guidance Conduit with Spatial Gradients of Neurotrophic Factors and Oriented Nanotopography for Repairing the Peripheral Nervous System, ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9(43) (2017) 37623–37636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [227].Wei Z, Hong FF, Cao Z, Zhao SY, Chen L, In Situ Fabrication of Nerve Growth Factor Encapsulated Chitosan Nanoparticles in Oxidized Bacterial Nanocellulose for Rat Sciatic Nerve Regeneration, Biomacromolecules 22(12) (2021) 4988–4999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [228].Zeng W, Hui H, Liu Z, Chang Z, Wang M, He B, Hao D, TPP ionically cross-linked chitosan/PLGA microspheres for the delivery of NGF for peripheral nerve system repair, Carbohydr Polym 258 (2021) 117684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [229].Hellenbrand DJ, Haldeman CL, Lee JS, Gableman AG, Dai EK, Ortmann SD, Gotchy JC, Miller KK, Doucas AM, Nowak NC, Murphy WL, Hanna AS, Functional recovery after peripheral nerve injury via sustained growth factor delivery from mineral-coated microparticles, Neural Regen Res 16(5) (2021) 871–877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [230].Giannaccini M, Calatayud MP, Poggetti A, Corbianco S, Novelli M, Paoli M, Battistini P, Castagna M, Dente L, Parchi P, Lisanti M, Cavallini G, Junquera C, Goya GF, Raffa V, Magnetic Nanoparticles for Efficient Delivery of Growth Factors: Stimulation of Peripheral Nerve Regeneration, Advanced healthcare materials 6(7) (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [231].Wang Y, Li Y, Huang Z, Yang B, Mu N, Yang Z, Deng M, Liao X, Yin G, Nie Y, Gene delivery of chitosan-graft-polyethyleneimine vectors loaded on scaffolds for nerve regeneration, Carbohydrate Polymers 290 (2022) 119499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [232].Huang C, Fu C, Qi ZP, Guo WL, You D, Li R, Zhu Z, Localised delivery of quercetin by thermo-sensitive PLGA-PEG-PLGA hydrogels for the treatment of brachial plexus avulsion, Artificial cells, nanomedicine, and biotechnology 48(1) (2020) 1010–1021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [233].Guo W, Pei B, Li Z, Ou XL, Sun T, Zhu Z, PLGA-PEG-PLGA hydrogel with NEP1–40 promotes the functional recovery of brachial plexus root avulsion in adult rats, PeerJ 9 (2021) e12269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [234].Manto KM, Govindappa PK, Martinazzi B, Han A, Hegarty JP, Koroneos Z, Talukder MAH, Elfar JC, Erythropoietin-PLGA-PEG as a local treatment to promote functional recovery and neurovascular regeneration after peripheral nerve injury, Journal of nanobiotechnology 20(1) (2022) 461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [235].Manto KM, Govindappa PK, Parisi D, Karuman Z, Martinazzi B, Hegarty JP, Talukder MAH, Elfar JC, (4-Aminopyridine)-PLGA-PEG as a Novel Thermosensitive and Locally Injectable Treatment for Acute Peripheral Nerve Injury, ACS Appl Bio Mater 4(5) (2021) 4140–4151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [236].Liu YJ, Chen XF, Zhou LP, Rao F, Zhang DY, Wang YH, A nerve conduit filled with Wnt5a-loaded fibrin hydrogels promotes peripheral nerve regeneration, CNS neuroscience & therapeutics 28(1) (2022) 145–157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [237].Tajdaran K, Gordon T, Wood MD, Shoichet MS, Borschel GH, A glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor delivery system enhances nerve regeneration across acellular nerve allografts, Acta biomaterialia 29 (2016) 62–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [238].Tajdaran K, Chan K, Shoichet MS, Gordon T, Borschel GH, Local delivery of FK506 to injured peripheral nerve enhances axon regeneration after surgical nerve repair in rats, Acta biomaterialia 96 (2019) 211–221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [239].Zhang L, Yang W, Tao K, Song Y, Xie H, Wang J, Li X, Shuai X, Gao J, Chang P, Wang G, Wang Z, Wang L, Sustained Local Release of NGF from a Chitosan-Sericin Composite Scaffold for Treating Chronic Nerve Compression, ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9(4) (2017) 3432–3444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [240].Yao Z, Yuan W, Xu J, Tong W, Mi J, Ho PC, Chow DHK, Li Y, Yao H, Li X, Xu S, Guo J, Zhu Q, Bian L, Qin L, Magnesium-Encapsulated Injectable Hydrogel and 3D-Engineered Polycaprolactone Conduit Facilitate Peripheral Nerve Regeneration, Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) 9(21) (2022) e2202102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [241].Chen SH, Kao HK, Wun JR, Chou PY, Chen ZY, Chen SH, Hsieh ST, Fang HW, Lin FH, Thermosensitive hydrogel carrying extracellular vesicles from adipose-derived stem cells promotes peripheral nerve regeneration after microsurgical repair, APL bioengineering 6(4) (2022) 046103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [242].Xu W, Wu Y, Lu H, Zhu Y, Ye J, Yang W, Sustained delivery of vascular endothelial growth factor mediated by bioactive methacrylic anhydride hydrogel accelerates peripheral nerve regeneration after crush injury, Neural Regen Res 17(9) (2022) 2064–2071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [243].Xu W, Wu Y, Lu H, Zhang X, Zhu Y, Liu S, Zhang Z, Ye J, Yang W, Injectable hydrogel encapsulated with VEGF-mimetic peptide-loaded nanoliposomes promotes peripheral nerve repair in vivo, Acta biomaterialia (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [244].Kamaly N, Yameen B, Wu J, Farokhzad OC, Degradable controlled-release polymers and polymeric nanoparticles: mechanisms of controlling drug release, Chemical reviews 116(4) (2016) 2602–2663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [245].Lee JH, Yeo Y, Controlled drug release from pharmaceutical nanocarriers, Chemical engineering science 125 (2015) 75–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [246].Mundargi RC, Babu VR, Rangaswamy V, Patel P, Aminabhavi TM, Nano/micro technologies for delivering macromolecular therapeutics using poly (D, L-lactide-co-glycolide) and its derivatives, Journal of Controlled Release 125(3) (2008) 193–209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [247].Kean T, Roth S, Thanou M, Trimethylated chitosans as non-viral gene delivery vectors: cytotoxicity and transfection efficiency, Journal of Controlled Release 103(3) (2005) 643–653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [248].Zhan L, Wang X, Lv Y, Deng J, Nan L, Ke Q, Guan S, Huang C, Ouyang Y, Anisotropic Single-layer Graphene/Nanodiamond Loaded PCL Conduits Provide Biophysical Cues to Manipulate Nerve Biomechanics and Bioelectric Function in the Restoration of Nerve Microenvironment, Advanced Functional Materials n/a(n/a) 2419411. [Google Scholar]
  • [249].Park J, Kim J, Choe G, Jung Y, Lee JY, Conductive hydrogel luminal filler for peripheral nerve regeneration, Biomaterials 317 (2025) 123103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [250].Yu X, Biedrzycki AH, Khalil AS, Hess D, Umhoefer JM, Markel MD, Murphy WL, Nanostructured mineral coatings stabilize proteins for therapeutic delivery, Advanced materials 29(33) (2017) 1701255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [251].Mou X, Ali Z, Li S, He N, Applications of magnetic nanoparticles in targeted drug delivery system, Journal of nanoscience and nanotechnology 15(1) (2015) 54–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [252].Li Y, Yang B, Wang Y, Huang Z, Wang J, Pu X, Wen J, Ao Q, Xiao K, Wu J, Yin G, Postoperatively Noninvasive Optogenetic Stimulation via Upconversion Nanoparticles Enhancing Sciatic Nerve Repair, Nano Lett 24(18) (2024) 5403–5412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [253].Dreiss CA, Hydrogel design strategies for drug delivery, Current opinion in colloid & interface science 48 (2020) 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  • [254].Taisescu O, Dinescu VC, Rotaru-Zavaleanu AD, Gresita A, Hadjiargyrou M, Hydrogels for Peripheral Nerve Repair: Emerging Materials and Therapeutic Applications, Gels 11(2) (2025) 126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [255].Wang P, Chu W, Zhuo X, Zhang Y, Gou J, Ren T, He H, Yin T, Tang X, Modified PLGA–PEG–PLGA thermosensitive hydrogels with suitable thermosensitivity and properties for use in a drug delivery system, Journal of Materials Chemistry B 5(8) (2017) 1551–1565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [256].Kang L, Fang E, Gu M, Guan Y, Wu D, Zhang X, Yu W, Wang J, Zeng Z, Xu S, He Y, Yuan W-E, An injectable thermosensitive pluronic F127 loaded-nanohydroxyapatite / Polydopamine for promoting sciatic nerve repair after crush injury, Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 245 (2025) 114324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [257].Yuan W, Li Z, Xie X, Zhang Z-Y, Bian L, Bisphosphonate-based nanocomposite hydrogels for biomedical applications, Bioactive Materials 5(4) (2020) 819–831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [258].Kim H, Kwon J, Kim H, Lee S, Kim S, Lee J-Y, Rahaman KA, Kim T, Lee H, Ok M-R, Chung S, Han H-S, Kim Y-C, Controlled Magnesium Ion Delivery via Mg-Sputtered Nerve Conduit for Enhancing Peripheral Nerve Regeneration, Advanced Healthcare Materials n/a(n/a) 2500063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [259].Thankam FG, Muthu J, Alginate based hybrid copolymer hydrogels—Influence of pore morphology on cell–material interaction, Carbohydrate polymers 112 (2014) 235–244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [260].Wei Z, Li X, Chen Y, Han Z, Li Y, Gan L, Yang Y, Chen Y, Zhang F, Ye X, Cui W, Programmable DNA-Peptide Conjugated Hydrogel via Click Chemistry for Sequential Modulation of Peripheral Nerve Regeneration, Advanced Functional Materials 35(23) (2025) 2419915. [Google Scholar]
  • [261].Yue K, Trujillo-de Santiago G, Alvarez MM, Tamayol A, Annabi N, Khademhosseini A, Synthesis, properties, and biomedical applications of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels, Biomaterials 73 (2015) 254–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [262].Homs J, Ariza L, Udina E, Navarro X, Chillón M, Bosch A, Schwann cell targeting via intrasciatic injection of AAV8 as gene therapy strategy for peripheral nerve regeneration, Gene therapy 18(6) (2011) 622–630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [263].Tannemaat MR, Eggers R, Hendriks WT, De Ruiter GC, Van Heerikhuize JJ, Pool CW, Malessy MJ, Boer GJ, Verhaagen J, Differential effects of lentiviral vector-mediated overexpression of nerve growth factor and glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor on regenerating sensory and motor axons in the transected peripheral nerve, European Journal of Neuroscience 28(8) (2008) 1467–1479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [264].Henriques A, Pitzer C, Dittgen T, Klugmann M, Dupuis L, Schneider A, CNS-targeted viral delivery of G-CSF in an animal model for ALS: improved efficacy and preservation of the neuromuscular unit, Mol Ther 19(2) (2011) 284–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [265].Hirai T, Enomoto M, Kaburagi H, Sotome S, Yoshida-Tanaka K, Ukegawa M, Kuwahara H, Yamamoto M, Tajiri M, Miyata H, Hirai Y, Tominaga M, Shinomiya K, Mizusawa H, Okawa A, Yokota T, Intrathecal AAV serotype 9-mediated delivery of shRNA against TRPV1 attenuates thermal hyperalgesia in a mouse model of peripheral nerve injury, Mol Ther 22(2) (2014) 409–419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [266].Samad OA, Tan AM, Cheng X, Foster E, Dib-Hajj SD, Waxman SG, Virus-mediated shRNA knockdown of Na(v)1.3 in rat dorsal root ganglion attenuates nerve injury-induced neuropathic pain, Mol Ther 21(1) (2013) 49–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [267].Gomez K, Stratton HJ, Duran P, Loya S, Tang C, Calderon-Rivera A, François-Moutal L, Khanna M, Madura CL, Luo S, McKiver B, Choi E, Ran D, Boinon L, Perez-Miller S, Damaj MI, Moutal A, Khanna R, Identification and targeting of a unique Na(V)1.7 domain driving chronic pain, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 120(32) (2023) e2217800120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [268].Shin SM, Itson-Zoske B, Fan F, Xiao Y, Qiu C, Cummins TR, Hogan QH, Yu H, Peripherally targeted analgesia via AAV-mediated sensory neuron-specific inhibition of multiple pronociceptive sodium channels, The Journal of clinical investigation 134(13) (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [269].Gushchina S, Yip PK, Parry GA, Sivakumar H, Li J, Liu M, Bo X, Alleviation of neuropathic pain by over-expressing a soluble colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor to suppress microgliosis and macrophage accumulation, Glia 69(12) (2021) 2963–2980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [270].Tadokoro T, Bravo-Hernandez M, Agashkov K, Kobayashi Y, Platoshyn O, Navarro M, Marsala S, Miyanohara A, Yoshizumi T, Shigyo M, Krotov V, Juhas S, Juhasova J, Nguyen D, Kupcova Skalnikova H, Motlik J, Studenovska H, Proks V, Reddy R, Driscoll SP, Glenn TD, Kemthong T, Malaivijitnond S, Tomori Z, Vanicky I, Kakinohana M, Pfaff SL, Ciacci J, Belan P, Marsala M, Precision spinal gene delivery-induced functional switch in nociceptive neurons reverses neuropathic pain, Mol Ther 30(8) (2022) 2722–2745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [271].Xin GD, Liu XY, Fan XD, Zhao GJ, Exosomes repairment for sciatic nerve injury: a cell-free therapy, Stem cell research & therapy 15(1) (2024) 214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [272].Namini MS, Daneshimehr F, Beheshtizadeh N, Mansouri V, Ai J, Jahromi HK, Ebrahimi-Barough S, Cell-free therapy based on extracellular vesicles: a promising therapeutic strategy for peripheral nerve injury, Stem cell research & therapy 14(1) (2023) 254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [273].Yao X, Zhou Y, Liu Y, Jie J, Wan X, Yang P, Engineered exosome-based treatment for peripheral nerve regeneration: a narrative review of clinical prospects, Advanced Technology in Neuroscience 2(3) (2025) 135–143. [Google Scholar]
  • [274].Galipeau J, Sensébé L, Mesenchymal Stromal Cells: Clinical Challenges and Therapeutic Opportunities, Cell stem cell 22(6) (2018) 824–833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [275].Yang Q, Su S, Liu S, Yang S, Xu J, Zhong Y, Yang Y, Tian L, Tan Z, Wang J, Yu Z, Shi Z, Liang F, Exosomes-loaded electroconductive nerve dressing for nerve regeneration and pain relief against diabetic peripheral nerve injury, Bioact Mater 26 (2023) 194–215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [276].Zhao J, Ding Y, He R, Huang K, Liu L, Jiang C, Liu Z, Wang Y, Yan X, Cao F, Huang X, Peng Y, Ren R, He Y, Cui T, Zhang Q, Zhang X, Liu Q, Li Y, Ma Z, Yi X, Dose-effect relationship and molecular mechanism by which BMSC-derived exosomes promote peripheral nerve regeneration after crush injury, Stem cell research & therapy 11(1) (2020) 360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [277].Pan J, Zhao M, Yi X, Tao J, Li S, Jiang Z, Cheng B, Yuan H, Zhang F, Acellular nerve grafts supplemented with induced pluripotent stem cell-derived exosomes promote peripheral nerve reconstruction and motor function recovery, Bioact Mater 15 (2022) 272–287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [278].Liu B, Alimi OA, Wang Y, Kong Y, Kuss M, Krishnan MA, Hu G, Xiao Y, Dong J, DiMaio DJ, Duan B, Differentiated mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomes immobilized in decellularized sciatic nerve hydrogels for peripheral nerve repair, J Control Release 368 (2024) 24–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [279].Lopez-Verrilli MA, Picou F, Court FA, Schwann cell-derived exosomes enhance axonal regeneration in the peripheral nervous system, Glia 61(11) (2013) 1795–1806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [280].Sun J, Zeng Q, Wu Z, Li Z, Gao Q, Liao Z, Li H, Ling C, Chen C, Wang H, Zhang B, Enhancing intraneural revascularization following peripheral nerve injury through hypoxic Schwann-cell-derived exosomes: an insight into endothelial glycolysis, Journal of nanobiotechnology 22(1) (2024) 283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [281].Hu T, Chang S, Qi F, Zhang Z, Chen J, Jiang L, Wang D, Deng C, Nie K, Xu G, Wei Z, Neural grafts containing exosomes derived from Schwann cell-like cells promote peripheral nerve regeneration in rats, Burns & trauma 11 (2023) tkad013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [282].Liu B, Kong Y, Shi W, Kuss M, Liao K, Hu G, Xiao P, Sankarasubramanian J, Guda C, Wang X, Exosomes derived from differentiated human ADMSC with the Schwann cell phenotype modulate peripheral nerve-related cellular functions, Bioactive materials 14 (2022) 61–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [283].Huang J, Zhang G, Li S, Li J, Wang W, Xue J, Wang Y, Fang M, Zhou N, Endothelial cell-derived exosomes boost and maintain repair-related phenotypes of Schwann cells via miR199–5p to promote nerve regeneration, Journal of nanobiotechnology 21(1) (2023) 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [284].Huang J, Li J, Li S, Yang X, Huo N, Chen Q, Wang W, Yang N, Wang Y, Zhou N, Netrin-1-engineered endothelial cell exosomes induce the formation of pre-regenerative niche to accelerate peripheral nerve repair, Science advances 10(26) (2024) eadm8454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [285].Zhao Y, Liu J, Liu S, Yang P, Liang Y, Ma J, Mao S, Sun C, Yang Y, Fibroblast exosomal TFAP2C induced by chitosan oligosaccharides promotes peripheral axon regeneration via the miR-132–5p/CAMKK1 axis, Bioact Mater 26 (2023) 249–263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [286].Brooks DN, Weber RV, Chao JD, Rinker BD, Zoldos J, Robichaux MR, Ruggeri SB, Anderson KA, Bonatz EE, Wisotsky SM, Cho MS, Wilson C, Cooper EO, Ingari JV, Safa B, Parrett BM, Buncke GM, Processed nerve allografts for peripheral nerve reconstruction: a multicenter study of utilization and outcomes in sensory, mixed, and motor nerve reconstructions, Microsurgery 32(1) (2012) 1–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [287].Weber RA, Breidenbach WC, Brown RE, Jabaley ME, Mass DP, A Randomized Prospective Study of Polyglycolic Acid Conduits for Digital Nerve Reconstruction in Humans, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 106(5) (2000) 1036–1045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [288].Vannucci B, Santosa KB, Keane AM, Jablonka-Shariff A, Lu CY, Yan Y, MacEwan M, Snyder-Warwick AK, What is Normal? Neuromuscular junction reinnervation after nerve injury, Muscle Nerve 60(5) (2019) 604–612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [289].Meyers EC, Kasliwal N, Solorzano BR, Lai E, Bendale G, Berry A, Ganzer PD, Romero-Ortega M, Rennaker RL 2nd, Kilgard MP, Hays SA, Enhancing plasticity in central networks improves motor and sensory recovery after nerve damage, Nat Commun 10(1) (2019) 5782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES