Skip to main content
Cellular Oncology logoLink to Cellular Oncology
. 2019 Jun 7;42(5):663–677. doi: 10.1007/s13402-019-00454-y

The role of TNF-α in chordoma progression and inflammatory pathways

Sukru Gulluoglu 1,2,#, Emre Can Tuysuz 1,2,#, Mesut Sahin 3, Cumhur Kaan Yaltirik 4, Aysegul Kuskucu 1, Ferda Ozkan 5, Altay Burak Dalan 6, Fikrettin Sahin 2, Ugur Ture 4, Omer Faruk Bayrak 1,✉
PMCID: PMC12994341  PMID: 31175552

Abstract

Purpose

Chordomas are highly therapy-resistant primary bone tumors that exhibit high relapse rates and may induce local destruction. Here, we evaluated the effects of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) on chordoma progression and clinical outcome.

Methods

Chordoma cells were treated with TNF-α after which its short- and long-term effects were evaluated. Functional assays, qRT-PCR and microarray-based expression analyses were carried out to assess the effect of TNF-α on chemo-resistance, epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT), migration, invasion and cancer stem cell-like properties. Finally, relationships between TNF-α expression and clinicopathological features were assessed in a chordoma patient cohort.

Results

We found that TNF-α treatment increased the migration and invasion of chordoma cells. Also, NF-κB activation was observed along with increased EMT marker expression. In addition, enhanced tumor sphere formation and soft agar colony formation were observed, concomitantly with increased chemo-resistance and CD338 marker expression. The TNF-α and TNFR1 expression levels were found to be significantly correlated with LIF, PD-L1 and Ki67 expression levels, tumor volume and a short survival time in patients. In addition, a high neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio was found to be associated with recurrence and a decreased overall survival.

Conclusions

From our data we conclude that TNF-α may serve as a prognostic marker for chordoma progression and that tumor-promoting inflammation may be a major factor in chordoma tumor progression.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s13402-019-00454-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Keywords: Chordoma, TNF-α, Inflammation, Tumor size, TNFR

Introduction

Chordomas are primary bone tumors that arise in the axial skeleton. They have an incidence rate of approximately one in a million. These rare tumors are highly resistant to chemotherapy and radiotherapy and, as yet, there is no successful, nonsurgical therapy available [1, 2]. Radical surgery followed by radiotherapy is the primary choice for treatment. Overall, the 5-year, 10-year and 20-year survival rates are 68%, 40% and 13%, respectively [3]. Although chordomas are slow-growing, they tend to be locally invasive and to show a high rate of relapse after surgery [4]. In early stages, chordomas are non-metastatic, but during the course of the disease, they tend to metastasize. Up to 60% of the patients develop distant metastases to the lung, bone, soft tissue, lymph nodes, liver and/or skin. Metastasis is a prognostic factor [4, 5], but the molecular basis of progression of the disease is still unclear [6].

A considerable portion of cancer-related environmental factors, such as chronic infection, tobacco use, asbestos inhalation and obesity, are associated with inflammation [7], and tumor-promoting inflammation is emerging as a hallmark of cancer. By using effector molecules, tumor-infiltrating inflammatory cells can induce angiogenesis, cancer cell proliferation, tissue invasion, metastatic dissemination and seeding [8–11]. So far, only a few studies have reported on the presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in chordomas. In a recent study, PD-L1 was found to be highly expressed in chordomas, together with the presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. In the same study, the presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes was found to be correlated with the occurrence of chordoma metastasis [12]. It has also been reported that chordoma cells may highly express epidermal growth factor receptor [13].

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) is a cytokine that is predominantly secreted by white blood cells, specifically macrophages. Although the name implies a necrotic and/or apoptotic effect, it can also promote the survival, motility, and invasion of cancer cells. Binding of TNF-α to tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (TNFR1) has been found to activate the NF-κB pathway, which eventually leads to anti-apoptotic activity [14]. TNF-α is known to play an important role in inflammation, immunity and cancer progression [15]. In ovarian cancer, it has been found that TNF-α, which is intrinsically produced by the cancer cells, can increase cell proliferation and tumor progression [16]. In vitro studies on renal cell carcinoma have suggested that TNF-α can induce epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) [17]. In ovarian and breast cancers, TNF-α treatment has been found to increase the level of CD44, which is a cancer stem cell marker [18, 19]. Long-term treatment of MCF-7 breast cancer cells with TNF-α has previously been used to generate a TNF-α-resistant cell line exhibiting increased chemo-resistance and EMT [20]. Leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) is a cytokine that binds to the LIF receptor (LIFR) and, by doing so, activates several signaling pathways, including the JAK/STAT3, PI3K/AKT, ERK1/2 and mTOR signaling pathways [21]. Previously, we found that LIF may have a tumor-promoting effect on chordomas [22]. PD-L1 is a transmembrane protein that is expressed in several cancers, including melanoma, lung cancer, breast cancer, ovarian cancer, pancreatic cancer, esophageal cancer, kidney cancer, bladder cancer and hematopoietic cancers. PD-1/PD-L1 interaction inhibits the stimulation, survival and effector function of T cells and causes apoptosis of tumor-specific T cells, allowing tumor cells to escape from immune attacks [23–27]. Additional studies have revealed potential cooperations between LIF, PD-L1, TNF-α and related molecules, which in turn may induce tumor-promoting inflammation in cancers [28, 29].

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the functional effects of TNF-α on chordoma cells in vitro and to investigate correlations between TNF-α expression levels and clinicopathological features.

Materials and methods

Cell culture and treatment

The U-CH1 [30] and MUG-Chor1 cell lines [31], available from the ATCC Bioresource Center, were kindly provided by the Chordoma Foundation (Durham, NC, USA). The cells were cultured on 0.1% gelatin (Cat. No: G1890-100G, Sigma-Aldrich, USA)-coated tissue culture plates and maintained in IMDM (Cat. No: 12440053, ThermoFisher, USA)/RPMI (Cat. No: 61870–010, ThermoFisher) medium at a ratio of 4:1 containing 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% antibiotics. This medium will be called culture medium (CM) after this point throughout the text. Routine flow cytometry and gene expression analyses for pertinent molecular markers, polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based mycoplasma screening and Sanger sequencing for short tandem repeats to verify the characteristics of the original cell lines were routinely carried out. Chordoma cell characteristics were retained in both the control cells and long-term treated samples (Supplementary Tables 1 and 2). For short-term experiments, 10 ng/ml human recombinant TNF-α (Cat. No: T0157, Sigma-Aldrich) was administered to cells for 1, 4 and/or 7 days, depending on the experiment. To obtain long-term TNF-α-treated cell lines, TNF-α was administered to U-CH1 and MUG-Chor1 cells for 12 months by gradually increasing the TNF-α concentration from 2.5 and 5 to 10 ng/ml every 2 months. Thereafter, the cell lines were grown in CM containing 10 ng/ml TNF-α. The NF-kB inhibitor QNZ (N4-[2-(4-phenoxyphenyl)ethyl]-4,6-quinazolinediamine) (Cat. No: SML0579, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) was administered to cells with TNF-α as a TNF + QNZ control for long-term treatment. To determine the permanent effects of prolonged TNF-α treatment, the U-CH1 and MUG-Chor1 cells were deprived of TNF-α after 6 months of TNF-α exposure. By doing so, another control group was established and labeled “TNF-α deprivation group”. The relationship and interaction between LIF and TNF-α in chordoma cells were assessed by treatment of the cells with 100 ng/ml recombinant human leukemia inhibitory factor (Cat. No: LIF 1050, Millipore, USA) in CM twice per week during 3 weeks.

Immunocytochemistry

Trypsinized cells were washed and resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (Ca++/Mg++-free) containing human FcR blocking reagent (Cat. No:120–000-442, Miltenyi Biotech, Germany). The cells were initially incubated on ice for 5 min and later incubated with an anti-CD338 antibody conjugated with PerCP-Cy5.5 (Cat. No: 561460, BD Biosciences, USA) for 30 min before being washed with PBS (Ca++/Mg++-free) to eliminate unbound antibodies. Both groups were stained with DAPI (Cat. No: 422801, Biolegend, USA) to exclude dead cells. To visualize the behavior of NF-kB molecules, cells grown on gelatin-coated coverslips were fixed with the 4% paraformaldehyde, blocked with 1% BSA and incubated overnight with a primary anti-NF-kB p65 antibody (Cat. No: ab16502, Abcam, UK). All washes were performed with PBS containing 1.5% Tween. Alexa Fluor 488-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG (Cat. No: A-11034, Thermo Fisher, USA) was used as a secondary antibody and incubated for 1 h. Nuclear staining was carried out using DAPI (Cat. No: 422801, Biolegend, USA), and the cells were visualized under a fluorescence microscope.

Cell migration and invasion assays

Transwell membrane inserts with an 8.0 μm pore size (PIEP12R48, Millipore, USA) were used to assess changes in the invasion and migration of TNF-α-treated cells. To assess invasion, the assay chambers were coated with 250 μg/ml basement Matrigel (Cat. No: 354234, BD Biosciences, USA) and incubated overnight at 37 °C. Next, 4 × 104 cells were transferred to the upper chambers in serum-free CM containing TNF-α (10 ng/ml). The lower chambers were supplied with 1 ml CM containing 10% fetal bovine serum. To analyze short-term effects of TNF-α exposure, U-CH1 and MUG-Chor1 cells were seeded in serum-free complete medium, serum-free complete medium + TNFα, and serum-free complete medium + TNFα + QNZ, and incubated for 24 h. The inserts were fixed with 3.7% formaldehyde, permeabilized with methanol and stained with crystal violet. The cells were visualized and counted in four different fields at 400-fold magnification under an inverted light microscope.

Colony formation assay

To assess the self-renewal of long-term TNF-α-treated cells, a colony formation assay was carried out. To this end, six-well plates were coated with 1 ml CM with 1% low melting point agarose (Cat. No: A9045, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and incubated at 37 °C to solidify. Next, a top layer containing cells in complete medium containing 0.7% low-melting point agarose was added. Medium was replenished every 3 days. After 3 weeks, the plates were stained with 0.05% crystal violet, and colonies containing more than 20 cells were counted under an inverted light microscope.

Tumor sphere formation assay

Long-term TNF-α-treated cells (4 × 105) were seeded in 25-cm2 culture flasks coated with 2% agarose and 0.9% NaCl in medium containing CM (serum-free) with 1% antibiotics, 50 ng/ml human FGF-2 (Cat. No: PHG0021, Thermo Fisher, USA), 50 ng/ml EGF (Cat. No:PHG0311, Thermo Fisher, USA), 1× N2 supplement (Cat. No: 17502048, Thermo Fisher, USA) and 1× B27 supplement (Cat. No: 17504044, Thermo Fisher, USA). Cell clusters were routinely dispersed with a serological pipette. After 4 weeks, spheroid bodies were transferred to 96-well plates, and the total number of tumor spheres was quantified under a light microscope.

Chemoresistance assay

To evaluate the effect of TNF-α on chemoresistance, cells were seeded in 24-well plates in duplicate for each experimental group. Several chemotherapeutic agents were examined to determine their cytotoxicity to chordoma cells. Paclitaxel and bortezomib were most cytotoxic (data not shown). The cells were treated with freshly prepared 0.016 μM paclitaxel and 0.016 μM bortezomib in complete CM, which was refreshed every 2 days. The viability assay was conducted over 7 days.

Microarray-based expression assay

For microarray-based expression analysis, total RNAs isolated using TRIzol (Cat. No: 15596026, Thermo Fisher, USA) from cells treated with TNF-α for 1 week (n = 2) or 12 months (n = 4), and untreated U-CH1 and MUG-Chor1 cells (n = 6) were used for whole transcriptome analysis using a Human Gene 2.1 ST Array (GeneAtlas System, Affymetrix, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The acquired data were analyzed using the Transcriptome Analysis Console 3 software tool (Affymetrix, USA). Additional analyses were performed using the internet-based DAVID and ingenuity pathway analysis tools (Qiagen, Germany).

Human chordoma samples

Twenty-four human chordoma samples were obtained during surgery at the Department of Neurosurgery, Yeditepe University Hospital. None of the patients had undergone chemotherapy. Samples used for gene expression quantification were frozen at −80 °C immediately after surgery. Additionally, paraffin-embedded chordoma tissues were preserved for immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. Clinicopathological data, including age, sex, tumor location, diagnosis, tumor origin, surgery margin, tumor volume, recurrence, metastasis and adjuvant therapy, were collected retrospectively (Supplementary Table 3). The neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (N/L) in patient serum samples was determined before surgery. The follow-up time was defined as the time that elapsed between surgery and death or last contact with the patient. Only samples that were pathologically defined as chordoma were included in the study. Samples with insufficient patient information or a follow-up time < 3 months were excluded from the study.

Quantitative RT-PCR

Fresh-frozen primary clival chordoma tissue samples were homogenized in liquid nitrogen using a mortar and pestle, followed by immediate addition of TRIzol according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Total RNA was also isolated from in vitro TNF-α-treated cells, LIF-treated cells, and their respective controls. RNAs were quantified using a NanoPhotometer (Implen, Germany). mRNA levels were quantified by two-step real-time PCR using TaqMan Gene Expression Assays (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Relative mRNA levels were determined using the 2-∆∆Ct method with GAPDH as internal control and by normalizing the values to those of the control groups.

Western blotting

Total protein was extracted using RIPA buffer (Cell Signaling, USA). Protein concentrations were quantified using a Pierce™ BCA Protein Assay kit (Cat. No: 23225, Thermo Fisher, USA). Protein samples were loaded onto 12% polyacrylamide gels (Cat. No:#1610174, Bio-Rad, USA) at a concentration of 20 μg/lane and after electrophoresis transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes. The membranes were blocked with TBS/Tween containing 5% nonfat dry milk for 1 h and subsequently incubated at 4 °C overnight with an anti-T (Brachyury) primary antibody (Cat. No: ab209665, Abcam, UK). Next, the membranes were washed with TBS/Tween three times and incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies. GAPDH (Cat. No: 5174, Cell Signaling, USA) was used as an internal positive control. Images were taken using Fusion Pulse (Vilber, France).

Immunohistochemical analysis

IHC analysis of paraffin-embedded chordoma tissues was carried out in a blinded manner using anti-TNF-α (Cat. No: ab1793, Abcam, UK) and anti-TNF receptor 1 (Cat. No: ab19139, Abcam, UK) antibodies by a pathologist who was uninformed about the clinical characteristics of the patients. An independent review was also performed. Cells in the cancerous regions of the tissues were scored as follows: (0) no, (1) low, (2), moderate or (3), high expression. Only membrane staining intensity was taken into consideration for anti-TNF receptor 1 scoring, whereas both membrane and cytoplasmic staining intensities were taken into consideration for anti-TNF-α scoring. Average cell intensity scores were calculated for every patient by weighted averaging of the scored cells and the percent area they occupied in the tissue.

Statistical analysis

Microarray-based expression data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. Clinicopathological features age, sex, tumor location, recurrence, metastasis and survival status of the patients were analyzed in correlation with TNF-α and TNFR1 expression levels, IHC score and N/L ratio. Correlations were evaluated using Spearman’s rank correlation test. An overall survival graph was prepared using the Mantel-Cox (log-rank) test, which is analogous to the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis method. All other p values were obtained using a two-tailed Student’s t test on experiments carried out at least in triplicate. A p value < 0.05 indicated statistical significance. Patients with high and low TNF-α and TNFR1 expression levels and N/L ratios were separated into groups of equal number according to the relative median. Each experiment was carried out in triplicate, unless otherwise stated in the text. Significant outliers were evaluated for each experiment and excluded from the analysis.

Results

Chordoma cells respond to TNF-α treatment

We found that after TNF-α treatment both the U-CH1 and MUG-Chor1 cell lines exhibited changed morphologies towards a more mesenchymal state with increased spaces between the cells and the formation of spindle-like cell structures, which indicates the occurrence of EMT in these cells (Fig. 1a). We also found that short-term TNF-α treatment had no effect on the proliferation of these cells (data not shown). Fluorescence microscopy analysis revealed that the U-CH1 and MUG-Chor1 cells express NF-kB, and that its abundance dramatically increased after TNF-α exposure compared to that in control cells. In addition, we found that the NF-kB inhibitor QNZ decreased the effect of TNF-α exposure. In the TNF-α-treated samples, a clear localization of NF-kB in the nucleus was observed, both at day 1 and day 7 (Fig. 1b), whereas long-term TNF-α deprivation did not cause any change in NF-kB localization and/or abundance (Fig. 1c).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Chordoma cells are responsive to TNF-α. (a) U-CH1 and MUG-Chor1 cells exhibit changed morphologies towards a more mesenchymal state upon TNF-α treatment. The space between cells increased and more spindle-like cellular structures were formed. Fluorescence images of short-term (b) and long-term (c) TNF-α treated cells. NF-kB subunit p65 (green) and the nucleus (blue) are visualized. Short-term TNF-α treated chordoma cells (1 day and 7 days) exhibited an activated NF-kB pathway resulting in increased staining of the p65 subunit and a nuclear localization. QNZ treatment reduced these effects. Long-term TNF-α treated chordoma cells exhibited an activated NF-kB pathway resulting in both increased staining of the p65 subunit and localization near the nucleus. Deprivation of TNF-α in long-term TNF-α treated chordoma cells did not change activation of the NF-kB pathway, whereas QNZ exposure reduced the abundance of NF-kB. Scale bar = 20 μm

TNF-α treatment increases invasion and migration and induces EMT-related gene expression

Using Transwell assays, we found that TNF-α treatment significantly increased the migration and invasion of both chordoma cell lines following both short-term (Fig. 2a) and long-term treatment (Fig. 2b), as indicated in representative images from long-term-treated samples (Fig. 2c). We also found that QNZ decreased the invasion and migration of the cells (Fig. 2a, b) and that long-term TNF-α deprivation did not cause any significant changes in invasion and migration of the cells (Fig. 2b).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

TNF-α treatment increases invasion and migration and induces EMT-related gene expression in chordomas. (a) A 24 h TNF-α treatment promoted the migration and invasion of U-CH1 and MUG-Chor1 cells. The addition of QNZ significantly decreased these effects. (b) Long-term TNF-α treatment significantly increased migration and invasion, but these effects were not decreased in TNF-α-deprived cells. QNZ significantly decreased these effects. (c) Representative images of migration and invasion assays from the long-term TNF-α treatment group. (d) Relative percent quantification of chordoma cell EMT markers in long-term TNF-α treated cells. TNF-α treatment decreased the relative levels of the epithelial markers E-cadherin, CK19 and EMA, while increasing the levels of the late mesenchymal marker ZEB2. The T level was also decreased in the long-term TNF-α treated cells. The threshold line represents 100, which was the value for the controls of each group, *: p < 0.05. (e) Relative percent quantification of chordoma cell EMT markers after short-term TNF-α treatment. On day 1, TNF-α decreased the relative levels of the epithelial markers CK19 and E-cadherin, while increasing the Vimentin, Twist, Slug and N-cadherin levels. On day 4, the E-cadherin and CK19 levels remained low, while the levels of the late mesenchymal marker ZEB2 increased. The T level was also decreased on day 4. QNZ treatment reversed the effects of TNF-α. The threshold line represents 100, which was the value for the controls of each group *: p < 0.05. (f) Western blot analysis of T protein expression in long-term TNF-α treated chordoma cells. While the T protein was not detected in long-term TNF-α treated U-CH1 cells, its level decreased in the TNF-α treated MUG-Chor1 and TNF-α-QNZ-exposed MUG-Chor1 groups. The T protein was also not detected in the MUG-Chor1 TNF-α-deprivation group (n = 2)

The effect of TNF-α on EMT marker gene expression levels was determined in U-CH1 and MUG-Chor1 cells after exposure to TNF-α. The expression of the EMT markers E-cadherin, CK19, EMA, Twist, Slug, Snail, Vimentin, Zeb1, Zeb2, and N-cadherin, was assessed using qRT-PCR. By doing so, a drastic suppression of the epithelial markers E-cadherin, CK19 and EMA was observed, whereas the late mesenchymal marker ZEB2 was upregulated. Subsequent QNZ treatment decreased the effects of TNF-α, but failed to neutralize levels to those of the control cells in most cases. We also found that the Brachyury (T) gene expression levels were suppressed by long-term TNF-α treatment, and that QNZ treatment significantly increased the T expression levels, although not to the point of complete rescue (Fig. 2d). In the short-term treatment samples, CK19 and E-cadherin were found to be suppressed, whereas the EMT markers Vimentin, Slug, Twist, and N-cadherin were already upregulated on day 1. No significant changes were observed in the T gene expression levels on day 1. We found that on day 4 the E-cadherin, CK19 and T expression levels decreased, whereas the ZEB2 expression level increased, compared to those in control cells. QNZ treatment resulted in an opposite or neutralizing effect with respect to TNF-α treatment (Fig. 2e). Using Western blotting, we found that the brachyury protein expression data were mostly consistent with the mRNA expression data. The T protein levels were found to be decreased in MUG-Chor1 cells compared to those in control cells. We also found that the T protein levels were decreased in U-CH1 cells after TNF-α treatment. Interestingly, we did not detect any T protein in TNF-α-deprived MUG-Chor1 cells (Fig. 2f).

TNF-α promotes anchorage-independent growth, tumor sphere formation and chemoresistance in chordoma cells

We found that long-term TNF-α treatment increased the colony forming capacities of U-CH1 and MUG-Chor1 cells in soft agar. QNZ administration to both long-term TNF-α-treated chordoma cells decreased their colony forming capacities (Fig. 3a). Under non-adherent conditions, we found that TNF-α treatment increased tumor sphere formation in the chordoma cells, and that tumor sphere formation in the long-term TNF-α-treated groups was significantly increased compared to that of the control groups (p < 0.05) (Fig. 3b). We also found that long-term TNF-α-treated cells exhibited significantly increased chemoresistance to paclitaxel and bortezomib compared to that in control cells. Subsequent QNZ treatment decreased the chemoresistance of these cells (Fig. 3c). The concomitant changes in the levels of the drug transporter CD338 (ABCG2) corroborated our findings, which indicates that long-term TNF-α treatment transforms chordoma cells towards a more chemo-resistant state (Fig. 3d). These assays were not conducted in the short-term treatment groups because of the potential early effects of TNF-α on viability.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

TNF-α promotes anchorage-independent growth, tumor sphere formation and chemoresistance in chordoma cells, indicating an increase in cancer stem cell characteristics. (a) Long-term TNF-α treatment promoted the anchorage-independent growth of U-CH1 and MUG-Chor1 cells in soft agar. The figure shows the relative number of colonies formed as a percentage of the control group. (b) Tumor sphere formation in U-CH1 and MUG-Chor1 cells in attachment-free conditions increased following long-term TNF-α treatment of chordoma cells. Columns in the graph represent the relative percentage to the values of the controls for each group. (c) Long-term TNF-α treatment increased the chemoresistance of chordoma cells to paclitaxel (0.016 μM) and bortezomib (0.016 μM). Chemoresistance was calculated as the percentage viability of TNF-α treated cells over that of untreated cells for each week and cell line. Cells maintained chemoresistance even after TNF-α deprivation. The addition of QNZ decreased chemoresistance. (d) ABCG2 drug transporter protein abundance in chordoma cells after long-term TNF-α treatment. Columns indicate the percentage of ABCG2-positive cells in the population under each condition. *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01

TNF-α bolsters tumor inflammatory and metastatic pathways in chordomas

Microarray-based expression data revealed that 702 genes were upregulated and 539 genes were downregulated in long-term TNF-α-treated samples compared to the control group. In addition, we found that 351 genes were upregulated and 200 genes were downregulated in the samples treated with TNF-α for one week. Subsequent KEGG pathway enrichment analysis revealed an enrichment in pro-inflammatory pathways both in the long-term and short-term treatment groups. Gene networks and genes related to inflammation and metastasis, such as Toll-like receptor signaling, TNF-α, NF-kB and cell adhesion molecules (CAMs), were found to be affected, with several genes being upregulated after one week of TNF-α treatment (Table 1). In long term TNF-α treated samples, crucial pathways and factors such as Ras and PI3K-AKT signaling pathways, HIF-1 and CAMs were found to be deregulated (Table 2).

Table 1.

Pathways enriched in one week TNF-α treated samples

Notable pathways Gene count Notable genes/Fold change P Value Function
TNF signaling pathway 18 VCAM1/8.71 NFKB1/2.2 3.66E-11 Inflammation, Metastasis
MMP9/3.98 CSF1/4.74
CCL2/40.35 CCL5/22.46
CXCL10/15.72 ICAM1/13.57
CFLAR/2.01 TNFAIP3/9.87
TRAF3/2.72 BIRC2/2.5
BIRC3/ 13.04
Toll-like receptor signaling pathway 12 TLR1/2.1 TLR2/2.25 1.05E-05 Inflammation, Metastasis
TLR6/2.05 CCL5/22.46
CXCL10/15.72 CXCL11/3.49
FOS/−15.51 TRAF3/2.72
NFKB1/2.2
NF-kappa B signaling pathway 10 NFKB1/2.2 NFKB2/2.69 7.04E-05 Inflammation, Metastasis
VCAM1/8.71 CFLAR/2.01
RELB/2.61 TRAF3/2.72
BIRC2/2.5 ICAM1/13.57
Cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) 9 VCAM1/8.71 L1CAM/2.07 0.00903 Invasion, Metastasis
CD226/−2.33 ALCAM/−2.54
CLDN1/4.73 ICAM1/13.57
SDC2/−2.58
Apoptosis 5 CFLAR/2.01 BIRC2/2.5 0.03893 Apoptotic Evasion
BIRC3/ 13.04 NFKB1/2.2
NGF/2.1
MAPK signaling pathway 10 RELB/2.61 FOS/−15.51 0.08163 Cell Growth
MAP2K6/−5.08 PLA2G4C/4.5
Associated cancer 6 Small cell lung cancer 0.03098 Cancer

The gene count represents the number of deregulated genes in each pathway. Notable genes and their fold change values are listed with additional information about the fold change in their expression compared to that in the control after the ‘/’ symbol. The p values of the KEGG enrichment analysis and relevant functions of the pathways are provided. Cancer related pathways are also provided

Table 2.

Pathways enriched in long-term TNF-α treated samples

Notable pathways Gene count Notable genes/Fold change P Value Function
Proteoglycans in cancer 24 WNT5A/11.31 FGF2/7.09 3.54E-05 Metastasis
IGF1R/2.78 TWIST2/3.77
VEGFA/3.07 SDC2/−3.73
Ras signaling pathway 25 KITLG/2.96 FGF2/7.09 8.76E-05 Chordoma Progression
IGF1R/2.78 PDGFRB/11.76
PDGFA/2.37 VEGFA/3.07
RASA4B/−2.01
Rap1 signaling pathway 23 KITLG/2.96 FGF2/7.09 0.00021 Cell survival, Metastasis
CDH1/−9.16 EFNA4/2.36
PDGFRB/11.76 PDGFA/2.37
PI3K-Akt signaling pathway 31 KITLG/2.96 COL1A1/4.16 0.00044 Chordoma Pathogenesis and Progression
COL4A1/4.59 FGF2/7.09
VEGFA/3.07 PDGFA/2.37
Focal adhesion 21 COL1A1/4.16 COL4A1/4.59 0.00108 Invasion, Chemoresistance
COL4A2/5.54 COL12A1/123.72
PAK2/2.43
Pathways in cancer 30 KITLG/2.96 WNT5A/11.31 0.00658 Cancer Progression
CDH1/−9.16 FGF2/7.09
FGFR3/−2.25 PDGFA/2.37
VEGFA/3.07
HIF-1 signaling pathway 11 EDN1/19.52 IGF1R/2.78 0.01341 CSCs, Metastasis, Chemoresistance
INSR/2.63 TFRC/2.9
VEGFA/3.07
ErbB signaling 10 CBLB/3.83 PAK2/2.43 0.01707 Inhibiton of Apoptosis
PRKCA/5.62
Cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) 13 VCAM1/19.28 CD226/−3.11 0.02824 Metastasis
L1CAM/8.18 ALCAM/−2.56
CDH1/−9.16 CNTNAP2/2.02
OCLN/−9.13 SDC2 /−3.73
ABC transporters 6 ABCA6/3.27 ABCA9/2.64 0.04839 Tumorigenesis, Chemoresistance
ABCC4/2.83 ABCC5/2.73
Signaling pathways regulating pluripotency 12 SKIL/3.00 WNT5A/11.31 0.04921 CSCs
FGF2/7.09
Related cancers 36 Melanoma, Glioma, Renal Cell Carcinoma, Prostate Cancer p < 0.05 Cancer

The gene count represents the number of deregulated genes in each pathway. Notable genes and their fold change values are listed with additional information about the fold change in their expression compared to that in the control after the ‘/’ symbol. The p values of the KEGG enrichment analysis and relevant functions of the pathways are provided. Cancer related pathways are also provided

Ingenuity pathway analysis revealed that TNF-α acts on a wide range of genes important for tumor progression. In the group treated with TNF-α for one week canonical pathways, including the tumor necrosis factor receptor 2 (TNFR2) signaling, macrophage activation, NF-kB signaling, Toll-like receptor signaling and IL-10 signaling pathways, were found to be affected. TNF-α, IL1B, the NF-kB complex, RelA and TGFB1 were found to rate among the top upstream regulatory genes identified by the analysis. Notable disorders related to these inflammatory responses are cancer and inflammatory diseases. Cell survival, movement and proliferation also ranked among the top features identified by the analysis (Supplementary Fig. 1).

In the long-term treated samples, in addition to the TNF-α downstream and inflammatory pathways, pro-angiogenic pathways were also found to be affected. The top upstream regulators in these analyses were TGFB1, TNF, IL1B, ERBB2 and Wnt3a. Notably, also these pathways are related to cancer and inflammatory diseases. The top molecular functions affected in these samples were cellular movement, development, growth and proliferation, as well as cell-cell interaction and cellular assembly (Supplementary Fig. 2).

For further analysis, networks showing highly consistent gene regulations were investigated. For the short-term TNF-α treated samples, three networks were generated. Supplementary Fig. 3A explains how the figures should be interpreted. Supplementary Fig. 3B includes genes related to elevated inflammatory responses with functions such as activation of antigen-presenting cells, myeloid cell recruitment of phagocytes and cellular immune response. Supplementary Fig. 3C focuses on elevated pathways involved in cell movement, migration and invasion, as well as leukocyte infiltration. Supplementary Fig. 3D focuses on macrophage recruitment. To investigate the effects of long-term TNF-α treatment, Supplementary Fig. 3E was designed, focusing on escalated gene interactions involved in the invasion of tumor cells and the branching of endothelial cells, which potentially mimics late metastatic processes in which intravasation and/or extravasation occurs. Supplementary Fig. 3F focuses on cellular movement in cancer, and the genes involved have previously been associated with pathways related to breast cancer cell movement. Supplementary Fig. 3G focuses on VEGFA downstream pathways, which lead to vascularization and fibroblast mobilization.

The microarray-based expression data discussed are deposited in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus [32] and are accessible through GEO Series accession number GSE101866 (ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE101866) for short-term TNF-α treatment and GSE101867 (ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE101867) for long-term TNF-α treatment.

TNF-α acts synergistically with LIF and PD-L1 in chordomas

To determine whether TNF-α treatment affects the expression of the cytokine LIF (and vice versa) in chordoma cells, we used qRT-PCR. In doing so, we found that U-CH1 and MUG-Chor1 cells treated with LIF for 3 weeks exhibited increased levels of TNF and TNFR1 compared to those without treatment (Fig. 4a). Interestingly, we found that long-term TNF-α treatment resulted in elevated levels of LIF and LIFR in both cell lines compared to those in control cells (Fig. 4b). In primary chordoma tumor samples, TNFR1 and LIFR levels were found to be positively correlated (p < 0.05) (Fig. 4c). Additionally, the effects of LIF and TNF-α on PD-L1 gene expression in chordoma cell lines and primary tumor samples were evaluated. We found that long-term TNF-α treatment increased the level of PD‐L1 in both cell lines compared to that in untreated cells (Fig. 4d). LIF treatment did not result in a significant change in PD-L1 expression (data not shown). In the primary tumor samples, both the TNF-α and LIF expression levels were found to be positively correlated with the PD-L1 expression levels (Fig. 4e, f).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

TNF-α-LIF relationship and correlation of TNF-α and TNFR with clinicopathological features in patients with chordomas. (a) Increases in TNF-α and TNFR1 expression levels in cell lines treated with LIF for 3 weeks. (b) LIF and LIFR levels in long-term TNF-α treated chordoma cell lines. (c) TNFR1 and LIFR were positively correlated in the patient cohort (n = 14). (d) Long-term TNF-α treatment resulted in elevated levels of PD-L1 in both chordoma cell lines. (e, f) The PD-L1 expression level was positively correlated with both TNF-α (n = 13) and LIF (n = 14) expression levels in the patient cohort. (g, h) TNF-α (n = 12) and TNFR1 (n = 18) were positively correlated with the Ki67 index in patient samples. (i) TNF-α and TNFR1 were co-expressed in chordoma tumors (n = 14). (j) The TNFR1 level was positively correlated with tumor volume (n = 20). (k, l) The TNFR1 level was positively correlated with ZEB2 (n = 15) expression, whereas it was negatively correlated with E-cadherin (n = 16) expression. Each finding was statistically significant (p < 0.05). *: p < 0.05. “n” indicates the number of patient sample pairs used for each analysis

TNF-α correlates with clinicopathological chordoma features

Patient-derived chordoma samples were examined for any relationship between TNF-α and TNFR1 gene expression levels and clinicopathological features using Spearman’s rank correlation. By doing so, the Ki67 expression levels in the tumor samples were found to be positively correlated with both the TNF-α and TNFR1 expression levels (Fig. 4g, h). Also, the TNF-α and TNFR1 expression levels were found to be positively correlated in the cohort (Fig. 4i) and the tumor volume was positively correlated with the TNFR1 level (Fig. 4j). In addition, we found that the TNFR1 expression levels were positively correlated with the ZEB2 and negatively with the E-cadherin expression levels (Fig. 4k, l). In our cohort, the TNF-α or TNFR1 expression levels did not correlate with age at onset, metastasis, survival or recurrence, but a high neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (N/L ratio) was found to be positively correlated with recurrence (Supplementary Table 4) and a short survival time (Fig. 5a).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Clinicopathological features including N/L ratio, TNF-α(IHC) and TNFR1 (IHC). (a) Chordoma patients with high neutrophil to lymphocyte (N/L) ratios exhibited shorter survival times than patients with low N/L ratios. (b) TNFR1 abundance determined by IHC analysis was positively correlated with tumor volume in chordoma patient samples. (c) Spearman’s rank correlation test on the IHC results showed a correlation between TNF-α and TNFR1 levels in our patient cohort. (d, e) Both high TNF-α and TNFR1 levels were associated with shorter survival times in chordoma patients compared to those with low TNF-α or TNFR1 levels. Each finding was statistically significant (p < 0.05)

In addition, paraffin-embedded chordoma tissue samples were analyzed by IHC for TNF-α and TNFR1 expression (Supplementary Fig. 4). We found that TNF-α and TNFR1 expression were positively correlated with recurrence in our patient cohort (Supplementary Table 4) and also that tumor volume was correlated with TNFR1 expression (Fig. 5b). Again, a positive correlation was observed between the TNF-α and TNFR1 expression levels (Fig. 5c). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that both TNF-α and TNFR1 expression were associated with a decreased overall survival (Fig. 5d, e).

Discussion

Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) account for a large portion of tumor-infiltrating leukocytes in human cancers. A high level of infiltration has been associated with a poor clinical outcome. Although originally considered as a mechanism to combat the tumor, it has been found that infiltrating leukocytes may propagate tumor formation and carry them to a more advanced stage [33–36]. In chordomas, such infiltration has been found to correlate with metastasis [12].

TNF-α, along with IL-1 and IL-6, is one of the most notable cytokines secreted into the extracellular space by leukocytes after tumor infiltration [37]. In case of tumor-promoting inflammation, LIF, along with VEGF, CSF1, IL-4, IL-6 and IL-10, has been found to play a major role in recruiting macrophages and in conditioning the extracellular environment, resulting in the transformation of the leukocytes into TAMs. These TAMs and other infiltrated cells secrete a number of factors into the tumor microenvironment, including TNF-α, which causes angiogenesis, invasion, tumor growth, metastasis, and immunosuppression. Previous findings have indicated that TNF-α may be produced by both tumor cells and tumor-associated cells [38]. TNF-α has also been found to be involved in tumor cell growth by establishing an inflammatory microenvironment [37] and to promote cell survival by acting on TNFR1 and TNFR2, which in turn induce anti-apoptotic pathways [38].

Interestingly, tumor-infiltrating cells suppress immune functions at the tumor location. Under sterile inflammatory conditions, the production of MHC class II molecules in leukocytes is suppressed by tumor cell-derived TGF-β1, IL-10 and PGE2 [37]. IL-10 and TNF-α in the tumor microenvironment have been found to induce the expression of PD-L1 in ovarian carcinomas, leading to the direct inhibition of immune responses by TAMs [39]. In chordomas, PD-L1 levels have been found to be correlated with metastasis and with elevated tumor infiltration by leukocytes [12]. Notably, in the current study, we found that TNF-α treated chordoma cells exhibited increased PD-L1 expression levels. Moreover, we found that PD-L1 expression was correlated with both LIF and TNF-α expression in a chordoma patient cohort. We also observed elevated TNF-α levels and activation of the canonical IL-10 pathway with IPA. These findings suggest that an important network involving TNF-α, IL-10 and PD-L1 interactions may be at work in chordomas eliciting immunosuppressive effects in the tumor microenvironment. CSF-1 and TNF-α production by tumor cells has been reported to recruit TAMs that produce metalloproteinases 2, 3, 7 and 9, and during local invasion these TAMs have been found to accompany the tumor cells [40, 41]. Here, we found that short-term and long-term TNF-α treatment had both similar and distinct effects on chordoma cells. Both types of treatment increased the ability of chordoma cells to migrate and invade. Early mesenchymal markers appeared after short-term treatment, and after long-term treatment the late mesenchymal marker ZEB2 was found to be abundant, as expected. In primary patient samples, the expression of TNFR1 was found to be correlated with ZEB2 and to be inversely correlated with E-cadherin expression. ZEB2, which represses E-cadherin, is known to be upregulated in an NF-kB-dependent manner [42]. Thus, it appears that the TNF-α/TNFR1/NF-kB/ZEB2/E-CAD axis contributes to the development of chordomas. The level of T (Brachyury) expression was found to decline in response to both long-term and short-term TNF-α treatment. The T expression levels in the short-term TNF-α exposed cells could reversibly be elevated by QNZ treatment, whereas long-term treatment made the process irreversible. T is a mesenchymal and diagnostic marker in chordomas. Additionally, T serves as an important therapeutic target [43]. Here we found that, although TNF-α treatment moved the cells towards a mesenchymal state at the morphological level, at the molecular level the expression of the mesenchymal marker T declined. This might imply that T is not critical for chordoma EMT and that the suppression of E-cadherin, CK19 and EMA, and the overexpression of ZEB2 provide sufficient means for EMT to occur. Interestingly, low levels of T have been noted in dedifferentiated chordomas, the most advanced type of the disease [44]. This may be another indication that TNF-α exposure may facilitate the transformation of chordoma cells and induce a more aggressive behavior. Loss of T dependence may be related to chordoma cell dedifferentiation, although further studies are needed to verify this option.

As the microarray-based expression data indicated, short-term TNF-α-treated samples exhibited patterns directly related to TNF-α, such as increased TNFR2 signaling. In long-term TNF-α-treated cells, similar effects were observed, along with activation of angiogenic and cancer stem cell-related pathways, including pathways that involve Wnt3a downstream genes. These results further support our proposed metastatic model of chordomas that involves tumor-promoting inflammation as a potential cause, brought about by pro-inflammatory cytokines such as LIF and TNF-α. In our patient cohort, the TNF-α and TNFR1 levels were found to correlate with several clinicopathological features. Although TNF-α treatment had no short-term in vitro effects on chordoma cells in our study, in vivo both TNF-α and TNFR1 expression levels were found to be correlated with Ki67 expression, which has prognostic significance in many types of cancer [45, 46]. This observation may be due to the long-term exposure of the cells to TNF-α in the tumor microenvironment along with various other cytokines and other factors. Additionally, we found that the TNFR1 expression level was correlated with tumor size. In a previous study, LIF levels were found to be correlated with tumor volume and short survival times in chordoma patients [22]. In our cohort, TNFR1 and LIFR expression levels were found to be positively correlated, and treatment of chordoma cells with TNF-α and LIF increased the expression levels of each of them as well as their receptors. These findings suggest that TNF-α and LIF may function cooperatively in the inflammatory chordoma tumor microenvironment. Based on our IHC results, we conclude that TNF-α and TNFR1 are significantly correlated with chordoma survival, and they may thus serve as candidate prognostic factors.

Several studies have suggested that TNF-α may increase the expression of both LIF and PD-L1 [47, 48]. This triple correlation indicates a potential relationship between these molecules and their downstream genes with tumor-promoting inflammation in chordoma, which may be a driving factor in disease progression. Furthermore, a high N/L ratio was found to be significantly correlated with tumor recurrence and a decreased overall survival in our patient cohort. Previous studies have revealed that a high N/L ratio may be indicative of a short survival time and cancer recurrence [49, 50]. TNF-α, which is released by neutrophils, also facilitates the recruitment of neutrophils in the tumor microenvironment [51, 52]. Therefore, TNF-α secretion and neutrophil recruitment could have a synergistic effect, and may indicate a poor prognosis in patients with chordomas.

Only a few studies have reported on the effect of potential tumor-promoting inflammation in chordomas. The findings of our current study suggest that examining tumor-promoting inflammation may be worthwhile to elucidate in detail the mechanisms underlying chordoma progression. Tumor inflammatory pathways are elevated upon TNF-α treatment and may be related to increases in aggressive traits such as EMT, migration, invasion and colony formation. Moreover, we found that TNF-α and TNFR1 expression is conversely associated with overall survival and may serve as a prognostic factors. Further studies are needed to assess the efficacy of potential therapeutic drugs and/or combined therapies to combat chordoma progression, chemoresistance and recurrence. Our findings suggest that tumor-promoting inflammation driven by TNF-α and its receptor may play an important role in driving the initiation and progression of chordomas.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Fig. 1 (112.2KB, png)

General summary of ingenuity pathway analysis for one week TNF-α-treated chordoma cells versus control cells. (PNG 112 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 2 (120KB, png)

General summary of the ingenuity pathway analysis for LT-TNF-treated chordoma cells versus control cells. (PNG 119 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 3 (877.9KB, pdf)

IPA causal networks generated for long- and short-term-treated chordoma samples. TNF-α treatment elevated pathways relevant to tumor-promoting inflammation and tumor progression in chordoma cells A) Legend for the created causal prediction networks. B) Gene expression networks related to elevated inflammatory response with functions such as the activation of antigen-presenting cells, myeloid cell recruitment of phagocytes and the immune response of short-term TNF-α-treated cells. C) Gene expression networks related to the pathways of cellular movement, migration, and invasion and leukocyte infiltration in short-term TNF-α-treated cells. D) Gene expression networks related to macrophage recruitment in short-term TNF-α-treated cells. E) Gene expression networks related to tumor cell invasion and endothelial branching in LT-TNFα samples. F) Gene expression networks related to cellular movement in LT-TNFα samples. G) Gene expression networks related to the downstream VEGFA gene network in LT-TNFα-treated cells. (PDF 877 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 4 (596.8KB, png)

Immunohistochemical (IHC) TNF-α and TNFR1 staining of chordoma tissues. Representative images showing the low, moderate and high expression of both TNF-α and TNFR1 in chordoma tissues. Scale bar =100 μm. (PNG 596 kb)

Supplementary Table 1 (14.2KB, docx)

(DOCX 14 kb)

Supplementary Table 2 (14.2KB, docx)

(DOCX 14 kb)

Supplementary Table 3 (59KB, doc)

(DOC 59 kb)

Supplementary Table 4 (15.4KB, docx)

(DOCX 15 kb)

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Kadir Caner Akdemir for assistance in evaluating the microarray data using ingenuity pathway analysis and Utku Ozbey for help with Western blotting. We also thank Julie Yamamoto for her editorial assistance. This study was supported by TÜBİTAK (grant number: 112S485) and Yeditepe University Hospital.

Funding

This study was supported by TÜBİTAK (grant number: 112S485) and Yeditepe University Hospital.

Compliance with ethical standards

The study was approved by the institutional review board of Yeditepe University Hospital (IRB 98-3943B and 101-4621B), and written informed consent was obtained from all participants. The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Sukru Gulluoglu and Emre Can Tuysuz contributed equally to this work.

References

  • 1.M.L. McMaster, A.M. Goldstein, D.M. Parry, Clinical features distinguish childhood chordoma associated with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) from chordoma in the general paediatric population. J Med Genet 48, 444–449 (2011) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.K. Almefty, S. Pravdenkova, B.O. Colli, O. Al-Mefty, M. Gokden, Chordoma and chondrosarcoma: Similar, but quite different, skull base tumors. Cancer 110, 2457–2467 (2007) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.M.L. McMaster, A.M. Goldstein, C.M. Bromley, N. Ishibe, D.M. Parry, Chordoma: Incidence and survival patterns in the United States, 1973-1995. Cancer Causes Control 12, 1–11 (2001) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.V. Ferraresi, C. Nuzzo, C. Zoccali, F. Marandino, A. Vidiri, N. Salducca, M. Zeuli, D. Giannarelli, F. Cognetti, R. Biagini, Chordoma: Clinical characteristics, management and prognosis of a case series of 25 patients. BMC Cancer 10(22) (2010) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 5.Y. Yang, X. Niu, Y. Li, W. Liu, H. Xu, Recurrence and survival factors analysis of 171 cases of sacral chordoma in a single institute. Eur Spine J 26, 1910–1916 (2017) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.S. Gulluoglu, O. Turksoy, A. Kuskucu, U. Ture, O.F. Bayrak, The molecular aspects of chordoma. Neurosurg Rev 39, 185–196; discussion 196 (2016) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.B.B. Aggarwal, R.V. Vijayalekshmi, B. Sung, Targeting inflammatory pathways for prevention and therapy of cancer: Short-term friend, long-term foe. Clin Cancer Res 15, 425–430 (2009) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.S.B. Coffelt, C.E. Lewis, L. Naldini, J.M. Brown, N. Ferrara, M. De Palma, Elusive identities and overlapping phenotypes of proangiogenic myeloid cells in tumors. Am J Pathol 176, 1564–1576 (2010) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.M. Egeblad, E.S. Nakasone, Z. Werb, Tumors as organs: Complex tissues that interface with the entire organism. Dev Cell 18, 884–901 (2010) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.MENINGIOMA of the cervical spinal dura with post-operative uremia and renal insufficiency, Clin Bull Univ Hosp Clevel (Ohio) 10, 12–14 (1946) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.C. Murdoch, M. Muthana, S.B. Coffelt, C.E. Lewis, The role of myeloid cells in the promotion of tumour angiogenesis. Nat Rev Cancer 8, 618–631 (2008) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Y. Feng, J. Shen, Y. Gao, Y. Liao, G. Cote, E. Choy, I. Chebib, H. Mankin, F. Hornicek, Z. Duan, Expression of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and prevalence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in chordoma. Oncotarget 6, 11139–11149 (2015) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.S. Scheipl, M. Barnard, L. Cottone, M. Jorgensen, D.H. Drewry, W.J. Zuercher, F. Turlais, H. Ye, A.P. Leite, J.A. Smith, A. Leithner, P. Moller, S. Bruderlein, N. Guppy, F. Amary, R. Tirabosco, S.J. Strauss, N. Pillay, A.M. Flanagan, EGFR inhibitors identified as a potential treatment for chordoma in a focused compound screen. J Pathol 239, 320–334 (2016) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.H. Wajant, The role of TNF in cancer. Results Probl Cell Differ 49, 1–15 (2009) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.F. Balkwill, Tumour necrosis factor and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 9, 361–371 (2009) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.S. Wu, C.M. Boyer, R.S. Whitaker, A. Berchuck, J.R. Wiener, J.B. Weinberg, R.C. Bast Jr., Tumor necrosis factor alpha as an autocrine and paracrine growth factor for ovarian cancer: Monokine induction of tumor cell proliferation and tumor necrosis factor alpha expression. Cancer Res 53, 1939–1944 (1993) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.M.J. Chuang, K.H. Sun, S.J. Tang, M.W. Deng, Y.H. Wu, J.S. Sung, T.L. Cha, G.H. Sun, Tumor-derived tumor necrosis factor-alpha promotes progression and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in renal cell carcinoma cells. Cancer Sci 99, 905–913 (2008) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.P. Bhat-Nakshatri, H. Appaiah, C. Ballas, P. Pick-Franke, R. Goulet Jr., S. Badve, E.F. Srour, H. Nakshatri, SLUG/SNAI2 and tumor necrosis factor generate breast cells with CD44+/CD24- phenotype. BMC Cancer 10(411) (2010) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 19.N. Muthukumaran, K.E. Miletti-Gonzalez, A.K. Ravindranath, L. Rodriguez-Rodriguez, Tumor necrosis factor-alpha differentially modulates CD44 expression in ovarian cancer cells. Mol Cancer Res 4, 511–520 (2006) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.J.W. Antoon, R. Lai, A.P. Struckhoff, A.M. Nitschke, S. Elliott, E.C. Martin, L.V. Rhodes, N.S. Yoon, V.A. Salvo, B. Shan, B.S. Beckman, K.P. Nephew, M.E. Burow, Altered death receptor signaling promotes epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and acquired chemoresistance. Sci Rep 2(539) (2012) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 21.X. Yue, L. Wu, W. Hu, The regulation of leukemia inhibitory factor. Cancer Cell Microenviron 2, e877 (2015) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.S. Gulluoglu, M. Sahin, E.C. Tuysuz, C.K. Yaltirik, A. Kuskucu, F. Ozkan, F. Sahin, U. Ture, O.F. Bayrak, Leukemia inhibitory factor promotes aggressiveness of Chordoma. Oncol Res 25, 1177–1188 (2017) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.T. Okazaki, T. Honjo, The PD-1-PD-L pathway in immunological tolerance. Trends Immunol 27, 195–201 (2006) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.M.E. Keir, S.C. Liang, I. Guleria, Y.E. Latchman, A. Qipo, L.A. Albacker, M. Koulmanda, G.J. Freeman, M.H. Sayegh, A.H. Sharpe, Tissue expression of PD-L1 mediates peripheral T cell tolerance. J Exp Med 203, 883–895 (2006) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.S.Y. Tseng, M. Otsuji, K. Gorski, X. Huang, J.E. Slansky, S.I. Pai, A. Shalabi, T. Shin, D.M. Pardoll, H. Tsuchiya, B7-DC, a new dendritic cell molecule with potent costimulatory properties for T cells. J Exp Med 193, 839–846 (2001) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.H. Dong, S.E. Strome, D.R. Salomao, H. Tamura, F. Hirano, D.B. Flies, P.C. Roche, J. Lu, G. Zhu, K. Tamada, V.A. Lennon, E. Celis, L. Chen, Tumor-associated B7-H1 promotes T-cell apoptosis: A potential mechanism of immune evasion. Nat Med 8, 793–800 (2002) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.L. Zitvogel, G. Kroemer, Targeting PD-1/PD-L1 interactions for cancer immunotherapy. Oncoimmunology 1, 1223–1225 (2012) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.P. Palmqvist, P. Lundberg, I. Lundgren, L. Hanstrom, U.H. Lerner, IL-1beta and TNF-alpha regulate IL-6-type cytokines in gingival fibroblasts. J Dent Res 87, 558–563 (2008) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.W. Pan, C. Yu, H. Hsuchou, Y. Zhang, A.J. Kastin, Neuroinflammation facilitates LIF entry into brain: Role of TNF. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 294, C1436–C1442 (2008) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.S. Scheil, S. Bruderlein, T. Liehr, H. Starke, J. Herms, M. Schulte, P. Moller, Genome-wide analysis of sixteen chordomas by comparative genomic hybridization and cytogenetics of the first human chordoma cell line, U-CH1. Genes Chromosom Cancer 32, 203–211 (2001) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.B. Rinner, E.V. Froehlich, K. Buerger, H. Knausz, B. Lohberger, S. Scheipl, C. Fischer, A. Leithner, C. Guelly, S. Trajanoski, K. Szuhai, B. Liegl, Establishment and detailed functional and molecular genetic characterisation of a novel sacral chordoma cell line, MUG-Chor1. Int J Oncol 40, 443–451 (2012) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.R. Edgar, M. Domrachev, A.E. Lash, Gene expression omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository. Nucleic Acids Res 30, 207–210 (2002) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.J.W. Pollard, Trophic macrophages in development and disease. Nat Rev Immunol 9, 259–270 (2009) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.A. Mantovani, P. Allavena, A. Sica, F. Balkwill, Cancer-related inflammation. Nature 454, 436–444 (2008) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.P. Nilendu, S.C. Sarode, D. Jahagirdar, I. Tandon, S. Patil, G.S. Sarode, J.K. Pal, N.K. Sharma, Mutual concessions and compromises between stromal cells and cancer cells: Driving tumor development and drug resistance. Cell Oncol 41, 353–367 (2018) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.N. Eiro, L. Gonzalez, A. Martinez-Ordonez, B. Fernandez-Garcia, L.O. Gonzalez, S. Cid, F. Dominguez, R. Perez-Fernandez, F.J. Vizoso, Cancer-associated fibroblasts affect breast cancer cell gene expression, invasion and angiogenesis. Cell Oncol 41, 369–378 (2018) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.C.E. Lewis, J.W. Pollard, Distinct role of macrophages in different tumor microenvironments. Cancer Res 66, 605–612 (2006) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.W.W. Lin, M. Karin, A cytokine-mediated link between innate immunity, inflammation, and cancer. J Clin Invest 117, 1175–1183 (2007) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.I. Kryczek, L. Zou, P. Rodriguez, G. Zhu, S. Wei, P. Mottram, M. Brumlik, P. Cheng, T. Curiel, L. Myers, A. Lackner, X. Alvarez, A. Ochoa, L. Chen, W. Zou, B7-H4 expression identifies a novel suppressive macrophage population in human ovarian carcinoma. J Exp Med 203, 871–881 (2006) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.S. Goswami, E. Sahai, J.B. Wyckoff, M. Cammer, D. Cox, F.J. Pixley, E.R. Stanley, J.E. Segall, J.S. Condeelis, Macrophages promote the invasion of breast carcinoma cells via a colony-stimulating factor-1/epidermal growth factor paracrine loop. Cancer Res 65, 5278–5283 (2005) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.L.M. Nusblat, M.J. Carroll, C.M. Roth, Crosstalk between M2 macrophages and glioma stem cells. Cell Oncol 40, 471–482 (2017) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.M. Kumar, D.F. Allison, N.N. Baranova, J.J. Wamsley, A.J. Katz, S. Bekiranov, D.R. Jones, M.W. Mayo, NF-kappaB regulates mesenchymal transition for the induction of non-small cell lung cancer initiating cells. PLoS One 8, e68597 (2013) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.T. Sharifnia, M.J. Wawer, T. Chen, Q.Y. Huang, B.A. Weir, A. Sizemore, M.A. Lawlor, A. Goodale, G.S. Cowley, F. Vazquez, C.J. Ott, J.M. Francis, S. Sassi, P. Cogswell, H.E. Sheppard, T. Zhang, N.S. Gray, P.A. Clarke, J. Blagg, P. Workman, J. Sommer, F. Hornicek, D.E. Root, W.C. Hahn, J.E. Bradner, K.K. Wong, P.A. Clemons, C.Y. Lin, J.D. Kotz, S.L. Schreiber, Small-molecule targeting of brachyury transcription factor addiction in chordoma. Nat Med 25, 292–300 (2019) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.M.M. Trucco, O. Awad, B.A. Wilky, S.D. Goldstein, R. Huang, R.L. Walker, P. Shah, V. Katuri, N. Gul, Y.J. Zhu, E.F. McCarthy, I. Paz-Priel, P.S. Meltzer, C.P. Austin, M. Xia, D.M. Loeb, A novel chordoma xenograft allows in vivo drug testing and reveals the importance of NF-kappaB signaling in chordoma biology. PLoS One 8, e79950 (2013) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.E.C. Inwald, M. Klinkhammer-Schalke, F. Hofstadter, F. Zeman, M. Koller, M. Gerstenhauer, O. Ortmann, Ki-67 is a prognostic parameter in breast cancer patients: Results of a large population-based cohort of a cancer registry. Breast Cancer Res Treat 139, 539–552 (2013) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.R. Verma, V. Gupta, J. Singh, M. Verma, G. Gupta, S. Gupta, R. Sen, M. Ralli, Significance of p53 and ki-67 expression in prostate cancer. Urol Ann 7, 488–493 (2015) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.M. Wetzler, M. Talpaz, D.G. Lowe, G. Baiocchi, J.U. Gutterman, R. Kurzrock, Constitutive expression of leukemia inhibitory factor RNA by human bone marrow stromal cells and modulation by IL-1, TNF-alpha, and TGF-beta. Exp Hematol 19, 347–351 (1991) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.X. Wang, L. Yang, F. Huang, Q. Zhang, S. Liu, L. Ma, Z. You, Inflammatory cytokines IL-17 and TNF-alpha up-regulate PD-L1 expression in human prostate and colon cancer cells. Immunol Lett 184, 7–14 (2017) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.R.Z. Sharaiha, K.J. Halazun, F. Mirza, J.L. Port, P.C. Lee, A.I. Neugut, N.K. Altorki, J.A. Abrams, Elevated preoperative neutrophil:Lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of postoperative disease recurrence in esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 18, 3362–3369 (2011) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.H. Shimada, N. Takiguchi, O. Kainuma, H. Soda, A. Ikeda, A. Cho, A. Miyazaki, H. Gunji, H. Yamamoto, M. Nagata, High preoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio predicts poor survival in patients with gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 13, 170–176 (2010) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.L. Benevides, D.M. da Fonseca, P.B. Donate, D.G. Tiezzi, D.D. De Carvalho, J.M. de Andrade, G.A. Martins, J.S. Silva, IL17 promotes mammary tumor progression by changing the behavior of tumor cells and eliciting tumorigenic neutrophils recruitment. Cancer Res 75, 3788–3799 (2015) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.S.B. Coffelt, M.D. Wellenstein, K.E. de Visser, Neutrophils in cancer: Neutral no more. Nat Rev Cancer 16, 431–446 (2016) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Fig. 1 (112.2KB, png)

General summary of ingenuity pathway analysis for one week TNF-α-treated chordoma cells versus control cells. (PNG 112 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 2 (120KB, png)

General summary of the ingenuity pathway analysis for LT-TNF-treated chordoma cells versus control cells. (PNG 119 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 3 (877.9KB, pdf)

IPA causal networks generated for long- and short-term-treated chordoma samples. TNF-α treatment elevated pathways relevant to tumor-promoting inflammation and tumor progression in chordoma cells A) Legend for the created causal prediction networks. B) Gene expression networks related to elevated inflammatory response with functions such as the activation of antigen-presenting cells, myeloid cell recruitment of phagocytes and the immune response of short-term TNF-α-treated cells. C) Gene expression networks related to the pathways of cellular movement, migration, and invasion and leukocyte infiltration in short-term TNF-α-treated cells. D) Gene expression networks related to macrophage recruitment in short-term TNF-α-treated cells. E) Gene expression networks related to tumor cell invasion and endothelial branching in LT-TNFα samples. F) Gene expression networks related to cellular movement in LT-TNFα samples. G) Gene expression networks related to the downstream VEGFA gene network in LT-TNFα-treated cells. (PDF 877 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 4 (596.8KB, png)

Immunohistochemical (IHC) TNF-α and TNFR1 staining of chordoma tissues. Representative images showing the low, moderate and high expression of both TNF-α and TNFR1 in chordoma tissues. Scale bar =100 μm. (PNG 596 kb)

Supplementary Table 1 (14.2KB, docx)

(DOCX 14 kb)

Supplementary Table 2 (14.2KB, docx)

(DOCX 14 kb)

Supplementary Table 3 (59KB, doc)

(DOC 59 kb)

Supplementary Table 4 (15.4KB, docx)

(DOCX 15 kb)


Articles from Cellular Oncology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES