Abstract
Influenza viruses possess two surface glycoproteins, hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA). Although HA plays a major role as a protective antigen, immunity to NA also contributes to protection. The NA protein consists of a stalk and a head portion, the latter of which possesses enzymatic NA (or sialidase) activity. Like HA, NA is under immune pressure, which leads to amino acid alterations and antigenic drift. The amino acid changes accumulate around the enzymatic active site, which is located at the top of the NA head. However, amino acid alterations also accumulate at the lateral surface of the NA head. The reason for this accumulation remains unknown. Here, we isolated seven anti-NA monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) from individuals infected with A(H1N1)pdm09 virus. We found that amino acid mutations on the lateral surface of the NA head abolished the binding of all of these mAbs. All seven mAbs activated Fcγ receptor (FcγR)-mediated signaling pathways in effector cells, and five of the mAbs possessed neuraminidase inhibition (NI) activity, but the other two did not; yet all seven protected mice from lethal challenge infection via their NI activity or FcγR-mediated antiviral activity or both. Serological analysis of individuals who were infected with A(H1N1)pdm09 virus revealed that some possessed or acquired the anti-NA lateral surface antibodies upon infection. We also found antigenic drift on the lateral surface of the NA head between 2009 isolates and 2015 isolates. Our results demonstrate that anti-lateral surface mAbs without NI activity can provide protection by activating FcγR-mediated antiviral activity and can drive antigenic drift at the lateral surface of the NA head. These findings have implications for NA antigenic characterization in that they demonstrate that traditional neuraminidase inhibition assays are inadequate to fully characterize NA antigenicity.
Introduction
Influenza A virus harbors two major glycoproteins on its envelope: hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA). HA and NA play pivotal roles in both the early and late stages of the virus replication cycle. HA binds to cellular receptors (sialic acid) on the cell surface to initiate entry (1, 2), while the enzymatic activity of NA cleaves off the sialic acid, allowing release of progeny viruses from the cell surface (3, 4). The enzymatic activity of NA also contributes to virus entry by removing receptor decoys that present in the airways (5).
Antibodies against HA and NA are elicited upon influenza virus infection in infected individuals (6–9). Antibodies against the head region of HA inhibit virus attachment to the receptor primarily by preventing receptor binding (10) and those against the stem region of HA inhibit viral fusion or egress (11–13). Although antibodies to HA are typically considered the mediators of protection from influenza virus infection, some studies have indicated the importance of anti-NA antibodies for protection (9, 14–17). Among the NA-specific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), some restrict virus spread by interfering with virus NA activity, resulting in aggregation of progeny virions on the cell surface. Such neuraminidase-inhibiting (NI) antibodies are known to reduce viral load and symptoms in infected mice, ferrets, and humans (14, 15, 18–21). Although the major antiviral ability of anti-NA antibodies seems to be its NI activity, one study reported that, for in vivo protection, a broadly reactive NI mAb required Fc-FcγR interactions (between an Fc region of IgG and Fcγ receptors (FcγRs)) to activate effector cells such as natural killer (NK) cells, macrophages, and neutrophils (22). NK cells express FcγRIIIa (23) and macrophages and neutrophils expressed FcγRIIa (24, 25). The activated NK cells, macrophages, and neutrophils suppress virus propagation via antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP), and antibody-dependent neutrophil-mediated phagocytosis (ADNP), respectively (26, 27). This study suggested the possibility that anti-NA mAbs could trigger FcγRs-mediated effecter cell activation to promote in vivo protection. These functions have been studied by analyzing anti-NA mAbs that possess NI activity and recognize epitopes around the enzymatic center of the NA head. However, the contribution of anti-NA antibodies that recognize regions other than those near the enzymatic center remains unknown.
To evade neutralizing antibodies, influenza viruses with amino acid changes in the epitopes of the major surface proteins (HA and NA) emerge (antigenic drift) (28–30). Similar to the antigenic drift of HA, the antigenicity of NA changes as a result of amino acid mutations in the NA head that allow escape from anti-NA antibodies (31, 32). Several amino acid changes that allow viruses to escape from NI antibodies have been mapped around the enzymatic center of the NA head (33). However, amino acid substitutions also accumulate at the lateral surface of the NA head, which is far from the enzymatic center, (33); the reason why mutations accumulate in this region remains unknown.
Here, we obtained seven mAbs that recognize the lateral surface of the NA head from two individuals naturally infected with A(H1N1)pdm09 virus during the 2015–2016 influenza season, and characterized these mAbs to understand their properties, particularly their roles in in vivo protection and antigenic drift.
Results
Isolation of human monoclonal antibodies that recognize A(H1N1)pdm09 virus.
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were obtained from two human volunteers who were infected with A(H1N1)pdm09 virus during the 2015–2016 influenza season. The PBMCs were fused with SPYMEG cells to generate hybridomas that express a human antibody. After several rounds of screening by ELISA using purified A/California/04/2009 (CA/04/09) virus and A/Yokohama/94/2015 (YO/94/15) virus, which were isolated during the first wave of the 2009 pandemic and in the 2015–2016 season, respectively, and classified into the genetic clades 1 and 6B.1 based on their respective HA sequences, hybridomas expressing antibodies bound to YO/94/15 virus but not to CA/04/09 virus were biologically cloned. Of 701 hybridomas screened, we obtained seven clones (DA05C23, HP02C70, DA05B02, HP02B69, HP02E74, HP02E63, and HP02B24) that expressed a monoclonal antibody (mAb) specific to YO/94/15 virus. Nucleotide sequence analysis of their variable regions revealed that all seven mAbs used the same VH gene (IGHV3–15*01), although the CDR3 sequence of each heavy chain varied (Supplemental Table 1). Five mAbs used IGLV3–1*01, whereas HP02B24 and HP02E63 used IGLV3–21*01 and IGLV6–57*01, respectively.
The seven human mAbs mainly recognize the NA of A(H1N1)pdm09 virus isolated in the 2015–16 influenza season.
To determine the breadth of recognition of the seven mAbs we obtained, we performed an ELISA using A(H1N1)pre2009, A(H3N2), and YO/94/15 viruses. None of the mAbs recognized A(H1N1)pre2009 or A(H3N2) virus (Fig. 1A). A broadly reactive human anti-N1-NA mAb clone 1000-3C05 (8, 22) bound to A(H1N1)pre2009 and YO/94/15 viruses, whereas the broadly reactive human anti-HA stem mAb clone CR9114 (34) recognized all three viruses tested (Fig. 1A). A negative control, anti-B HA 1430E3/9, did not bind to any of these viruses. These results indicate that the seven mAbs isolated here are specific to A(H1N1)pdm09 virus. Next, we performed an ELISA using A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses isolated during different influenza seasons. HP02C70, DA05B02, HP02E74, HP02E63, and HP02B24 showed specific binding to YO/94/15 virus, whereas HP02B69 and DA05C23 bound preferentially to YO/94/15 virus and weakly to A/Osaka/6/2014 virus (Fig. 1B). EM-3C02, which was reported to be a strain-specific human anti-N1-NA mAb (8, 22), bound to CA/04/09 and A/Hiroshima/66/2011 viruses, whereas the broadly reactive mAb 1000-3C05 recognized all viruses tested. The anti-influenza B HA mAb clone 1430E3/9 failed to recognize any of the viruses tested. These results indicate that the seven mAbs obtained are not broadly reactive but mainly recognize YO/94/15 virus.
Figure 1. Breadth of reactivity of seven isolated mAbs.

(A) The breadth of mAb recognition was examined in an ELISA using purified YO/94/15, A(H1N1)pre2009, and A(H3N2) viruses. Binding is shown as the OD450 value. 1000-3C05 broadly binds to N1-NA. CR9114, which targets the HA stem, and 1430E3/9, which recognizes the HA of influenza B virus, were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. (B) The reactivity of mAbs against six A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses [CA/04/09 (clade 1), A/Hiroshima/66/2011 (clade 5), A/Osaka/83/2011 (clade 7), A/Osaka/33/2013 (clade 6C), A/Osaka/6/2014 (clade 6B), and YO/94/15 (clade 6B.1) viruses] isolated in different influenza seasons was evaluated by ELISA. Binding is shown as the OD450 value. EM-3C02 specifically binds to the NA of A(H1N1)pdm09 virus. (C) The viral protein targeted by the isolated mAbs was determined by use of an ELISA using purified reassortant viruses, harboring HA and NA segments derived from YO/94/15 or CA/04/09 virus. Binding is shown as the OD450 value. All ELISAs were performed twice independently and yielded similar results.
To determine which viral protein was recognized by these mAbs, we performed an ELISA using purified reassortant viruses possessing HA and NA derived from YO/94/15 or CA/04/09 virus. All seven mAbs bound to viruses possessing NA derived from YO/94/15 virus, whereas EM-3C02 recognized a virus possessing NA derived from CA/04/09, but not YO/94/15, virus (Fig. 1C). 1000–3C05 detected all of the viruses tested. These results demonstrate that these seven human mAbs are against the NA of A(H1N1)pdm09 virus.
We next determined the binding affinity of the seven mAbs to NA derived from YO/94/15 virus by use of a Scatchard analysis (Supplementary Fig. 1). DA05C23 and HP02C70 possessed high binding affinities (KD = 0.86 and 0.73 nM, respectively), which were comparable to that of 1000-3C05 (KD = 0.82 nM). However, DA05B02, HP02B69, HP02E74, HP02E63, and HP02B24 showed relatively lower binding affinities than that of 1000-3C05 (KD = 2.57, 3.24, 4.18, 3.22, and 3.62 nM, respectively).
The seven mAbs recognize the lateral surface of the NA head.
To determine the amino acids that are important for the binding of the seven anti-NA mAbs, we compared the amino acid sequences of the NA protein from the six viruses used in Fig. 1B and identified six unique amino acids in the NA of YO/94/15 virus (Fig. 2A, 13I, 44I, 263I, 268K, 314M, and 390K; N2 numbering). We then generated mutant YO/94/15 viruses possessing single amino acid substitutions (I13V, I44L, I263V, K268N, M314I, or K390N) in their NA and examined the binding of the seven mAbs in an ELISA. HP02C70, DA05B02, HP02E74, HP02E63, and HP02B24 did not bind to virus possessing the K390N substitution in its NA but did bind to viruses possessing the I13V, I44L, I263V, K268N, or M314I substitution (Fig. 2B). DA05C23 and HP02B69 recognized all of the NA mutant viruses that possessed single amino acid substitutions, but showed decreased reactivity against the K390N mutant virus. Since these two clones weakly bound to A/Osaka/6/2014 virus (see Fig. 1B), we selected three amino acids shared only by the A/Osaka/6/2014 and YO/94/15 viruses (i.e., 38V, 321V, and 432E) for additional mutant generation. We generated mutant viruses possessing two substitutions (V38I and K390N, V321I and K390N, or E432K and K390N) in their NA and tested mAb binding. DA05C23 and HP02B69 did not bind to the virus possessing the K390N and E432K mutations in NA but still bound to the viruses possessing V38I and K390N or V321I and K390N (Fig. 2B). These results suggest that the amino acid at position 390 and the amino acids at positions 390 and 432 are important for the recognition of five and two of the monoclonal antibodies, respectively. Therefore, we mapped positions 390 (orange) and 432 (blue) together with the neuraminidase catalytic residues (cyan) on the NA head molecule (Fig. 2C). Position 390 is located at the lateral face of the NA head, whereas position 432 is located at the edge of the enzymatic center on the upper surface of NA (Fig. 2C). The distance between positions 390 and 432 based on the crystal structure of the NA head molecule is approximately 3 nm. Since an antibody footprint is typically 4–10 nm2 (35, 36), both amino acids are likely to be covered by one mAb. Therefore, we suggest that the five anti-NA mAbs that recognize an epitope around position 390, mainly recognize the lateral surface of NA and that the other two anti-NA mAbs, which lose binding to NA with mutations at positions 390 and 432, recognize an epitope that spans the upper and lateral surfaces.
Figure 2. Epitope analysis of isolated anti-NA mAbs.

(A) The NA amino acid sequences of A/Hiroshima/66/2011, A/Osaka/83/2011, A/Osaka/33/2013, A/Osaka/6/2014, and YO/94/15 viruses were compared with that of CA/04/09 virus. Bullets indicate an identical residue to the CA/04/09 sequence. The amino acid numbering corresponds to the N2 numbering. (B) Binding of mAbs to mutant viruses possessing the indicated mutations in YO/94/15-NA was examined by means of an ELISA. Binding is shown as the OD450 value. These experiments were performed twice independently and yielded similar results. (C) Positions of amino acids that are important for mAbs binding are shown on the NA structure of CA/04/09 virus. Each NA monomer is indicated in white, grey, or black. Cyan indicates the catalytic residues; orange and blue indicate the amino acids that are important for mAb binding.
The seven anti-NA mAbs differ in their NI activity.
To further characterize the seven anti-NA mAbs, we assessed their ability to inhibit viral sialidase activity in an enzyme-linked lectin assay (ELLA). DA05C23, HP02C70, and DA05B02 strongly inhibited NA activity with 50% inhibition concentration (IC50) values of 0.38, 0.60, and 0.73 nM, respectively (Fig. 3A). HP02B69 weakly inhibited NA activity with an IC50 value of 7.52 nM, which was similar to that of 1000-3C05 (IC50 = 12.05 nM). HP02E74 slightly inhibited NA activity at high concentrations (IC50 = >26.67 nM), whereas HP02B24 and HP02E63 possessed no NI activity at all. To further confirm the NI activity in vitro, we performed a plaque size reduction assay. In this assay, DA05C23, HP02C70, and DA05B02 decreased viral plaque size by 50% or more at the highest concentration (Fig. 3B). The plaques that formed in the presence of HP02B69 and HP02E74 were about 30% smaller than those that formed in the absence of a mAb. In contrast, the plaque size reduction induced by HP02B24, HP02E63, and 1000-3C05 was approximately 10% at any concentration tested. Taken together, these results indicate that DA05C23, HP02C70, and DA05B02 possess relatively high NI activity, HP02B69 and HP02E74 possess relatively low NI activity, and HP02B24 and HP02E63 fail to inhibit NA activity.
Figure 3. In vitro characterization of the isolated anti-NA mAbs.

(A) mAb inhibition of NA activity was examined in an ELLA. This assay uses fetuin as a substrate and the purified YO/94/15 virus as the antigen/enzyme. NA cleaves terminal sialic acids from fetuin and the exposed galactose is detected by horseradish peroxidase-conjugated peanut agglutinin (PNA). NA activities in the presence of each mAbs were normalized to those in the absence of antibodies, and are expressed as relative NA inhibition activities. Data are shown as the mean ± standard deviations (SDs) of three technically independent experiments. (B) The inhibition of plaque formation was calculated by comparing the average plaque size in the presence of each mAb with that in the absence of mAb. Average plaque size was measured in three technically independent experiments, and SDs are shown as error bars. (C) Activation of the ADCC and ADCP signaling pathways. FcγR-mediated signaling activation in effector cells expressing human FcγRIIIa (ADCC) or FcγRIIa (ADCP) was induced by co-culture with A549 cells that were infected with YO/94/15 virus, or 293T cells transfected with an NA-expressing plasmid. Signaling activation was measured in three technically independent experiments and error bars reflect SDs. The N297Q mutant mAbs did not interact with FcγRs. 1430E3/9, which is an anti-influenza B HA mAb, was used as a negative control.
The seven anti-NA mAbs activate the FcγR-mediated signaling pathway in effector cells.
We next asked whether these anti-NA mAbs elicit antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) or antibody dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP) by using ADCC and ADCP reporter bioassays. By using these reporter bioassays, we found that the three mAbs that possess high NI activity, HP02C70, DA05C23, and DA05B02, efficiently activated the ADCC and ADCP signaling pathways in effector cells co-cultured with both virus-infected and NA-expressing cells, except for the ADCC reporter assay with DA05C23 and NA-expressing cells, which was moderately activated (Fig. 3C). HP02B69 and HP02E74, which possessed low NI activity, moderately activated the ADCC signaling pathway and efficiently activated the ADCP signaling pathway in the effector cells co-cultured with infected and NA-expressing cells. HP02B24 and HP02E63, which had no NI activity, induced low or similar ADCC and ADCP signaling activation to that induced by the other five mAbs. 1000-3C05, which protected mice from lethal infection by activating FcγR-mediated effector cells (22), triggered ADCC and ADCP signal activation via both virus-infected and NA-expressing cells. All of the mAbs that possessed the N297Q mutation, which abolishes the interaction with FcγRs, and 1430E3/9 caused little-to-no activation in both reporter assays. These results indicate that our seven anti-NA mAbs have the potential to activate ADCC and ADCP.
The anti-NA mAbs protect mice from lethal infection via their NI and FcγR-mediated antiviral activities.
Since our mAbs possessed various levels of NI activity and activated FcγRIIIa- and FcγRIIa-mediated signaling pathways to various extents, we examined their in vivo protective efficacy against lethal influenza virus infection. For these in vivo tests, we monitored the body weight loss and survival of mice infected with 10 MLD50 (50% mouse lethal dose) of a challenge virus after administration of the wild-type or mutant N297Q mAb at 30 mg/kg (results of administration at 5 or 1 mg/kg are shown in Supplementary Fig. 2). 1000-3C05, which requires FcγR-mediated effector cell activation to provide in vivo protection (22), or 1430E3/9, which is an anti-influenza B HA antibody, served as positive and negative controls, respectively. All of the wild-type anti-NA mAbs, except for DA05B02, protected all of the mice from lethal challenge infection, with the mice experiencing transient weight loss (Fig. 4). Of the mutant N297Q mAb-administrated groups, 75% of the mice that received HP02C70 or DA05B02, which possessed high NI activity, survived (Fig. 4). In particular, the N297Q mutant mAb DA05B02 showed similar in vivo protective potency to that of its wild-type counterpart. The N297Q mutants of DA05C23, HP02B69, and HP02E74, which possessed NI activity, protected 25% of the mice that experienced severe weight loss. The N297Q mutants of HP02E63 and HP02B24, which showed no NI activity, failed to protect any mice. Wild-type 1000-3C05 showed protection with transient weight loss, whereas no mice that received the N297Q mutant of 1000-3C05 survived. Mice that received 1430E3/9 experienced similar weight loss to that experienced by mice that received PBS. These results suggest that both the NI activity and FcγR-mediated antiviral activity of the anti-NA mAbs contribute to protection against influenza virus infection. Moreover, FcγR-mediated antiviral activity played central roles in the in vivo protection provided by the anti-NA mAbs that lacked NI activity.
Figure 4. In vivo protective efficacy of anti-NA mAbs.

Four mice per group were intraperitoneally injected with PBS or the indicated mAbs at 30 mg/kg. One day later, the mice were challenged with 10 MLD50 of the challenge virus. Body weight changes and survival were monitored daily for 14 days. Solid lines or dashed lines indicate the group that was exposed to the wild-type mAb or the N297Q mutant mAb, respectively. 1430E3/9 and PBS were used as negative controls. Body weight changes are shown as the mean ± SDs. * indicates P < 0.01. A two-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s tests and the two-sided log-rank test were used to obtain the body weight curves and the Kaplan-Meier survival curves, respectively.
Antibodies recognizing the lateral surface of the NA head of A(H1N1)pdm09 virus in patient sera.
To evaluate whether individuals who were infected with the A(H1N1)pdm09 virus possessed antibodies targeting the lateral surface of the NA head on the day they visited the hospital or 1 month after infection, we performed a competitive binding ELISA using a protective mAb without NI activity, HP02E63 or HP02B24, or a cocktail of our seven anti-NA mAbs (Fig. 5A). The Fc region of these mAbs was replaced with that of mouse IgG2a so as not to be recognized by the HRP-conjugated antibody. In the presence of the mAb cocktail or each mAb, we assessed antibody binding in the serum samples of patients infected with A(H1N1)pdm09 virus during the 2015–2016 influenza season to VLPs displaying YO/94/15-NA; the NA-displaying VLPs were produced by expressing Ebola virus VP40 and NA since humans do not have antibodies to VP40. All of the patients were found to possess antibodies that competed with the anti-NA mAb cocktail 30 days after infection (Fig. 5B). Serum samples from patients HP001, HP002, HP014, and HP021 or from HP002 and HP021 collected 30 days after infection contained significant amounts of antibodies that competed with antibodies HP02E63 or HP02B24, respectively (Fig. 5C and 5D). On the day that each patient visited the hospital, HP001 and HP021 had antibodies that competed with the anti-NA mAbs cocktail, HP02E63, and/or HP02B24 (Fig. 5). These results demonstrate that substantial amounts of antibodies targeting epitopes on the lateral surface of the NA head were induced upon virus infection.
Figure 5. Competitive binding between antibodies in the sera of infected individuals and mAbs targeting the lateral surface of the NA head.

(A) Schematic diagram of the competitive binding assay. For the competitive ELISA assay, ELISA plates were coated with VP40-induced VLPs presenting YO/94/15-NA. The antigen-coated plates were then incubated with the anti-NA mAbs of interest that possessed the mouse Fc region (shown as a white antibody). The plates were then washed and six serum samples were added. Antibodies in the serum that did not compete with our mAbs (shown as a black antibody) bound to the antigen, whereas antibodies that did compete with our mAbs (shown as a yellow antibody) failed to bind to the antigen. The bound antibodies were detected by using the HRP-conjugated anti-human Fc antibody and then visualized by using the substrate TMB. (B-D) VP40-induced VLPs presenting YO/94/15-NA were used as the antigen. A cocktail of seven anti-NA mAbs (B) or mAb HP02E63 (C) or HP02B24 (D), whose Fc region was exchanged with the Fc region of mouse IgG2a, was incubated with antigen-coated plates to block their epitope before incubation with the serum. Serum samples used here were collected from patients who were infected with A(H1N1)pdm09 virus in the 2015–2016 influenza season. Dashed lines or solid lines indicate sera collected on day 0 or 30 post-infection, respectively. Wells treated with PBS instead of monoclonal antibody were used as control wells; the grey dashed line indicates the OD450 values of the control wells for the Day 0 serum samples. The average OD450 values were measured in three technically independent experiments, and the SDs are shown as error bars. * indicates P < 0.01 (one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test).
NA antigenicity differs between 2009 and 2015 isolates of A(H1N1)pdm09 virus.
Influenza viruses constantly evade suppressive antibodies by acquiring mutations in the epitopes of not only HA, but also NA. Therefore, we investigated the antigenicity of CA/04/09-NA and YO/94/15-NA in an ELISA using 22 serum samples that were collected during the 2009–2010 influenza season from volunteers who had neutralization antibodies against A(H1N1)pdm09 virus (37). We found that end-point titers to YO/94/15-NA were significantly lower than those to CA/04/09-NA (Fig. 6A). These results indicate that YO/94/15-NA differed antigenically from CA/04/09-NA.
Figure 6. Antigenic differences between CA/04/09 and YO/94/15-NA.

(A) The antibody titers of sera collected from volunteers in the 2009–2010 influenza season against the NA of CA/04/09 or YO/94/15 virus were determined by using an ELISA. 293T cells transiently expressing CA/04/09-NA or YO/94/15-NA were used as the antigen. The reciprocal of the highest dilution providing an OD450 value of greater than 0.1 was expressed as the end-point titer. End-point titers to YO/94/15-NA were plotted against those to CA/04/09-NA. The black dashed line indicates a 1:1 ratio of YO/94/15-NA end-point titers to CA/04/09-NA end-point titers and the grey dashed lines indicate the 1:4 or 4:1 ratios. The P value was calculated by using the two-sided Wilcoxon signed rank test. (B) Amino acid substitutions in YO/94/15-NA are shown on the NA structure. Cyan indicates the catalytic residues; blue or orange indicate the amino acids located around the enzymatic center or on the lateral surface of the NA head, respectively. The stalk region of NA is not included in this structure. (C-D) We determined end-point titers of sera, collected during the 2009–2010 influenza season, against CA/04/09-NA with (C) mutations around the enzymatic center (left), on the lateral surface (middle), or in the stalk region (right), or (D) the N390K single mutation. End-point titers to each CA/04/09-NA mutant were plotted against those to the wild-type CA/04/09-NA. The black dashed line indicates the 1:1 ratio and the grey dashed lines indicate the 1:4 or 4:1 ratios of the y-axis end-point titers to the x-axis titers. The blue dots indicate individuals whose sera showed weak binding to CA/04/09-NA with mutations around the enzymatic center, and the red and orange dots indicate individuals whose sera showed weak binding to CA/04/09-NA with mutations on the lateral surface.
To determine which amino acid mutations are responsible for the antigenic change in NA, we compared the amino acid sequences of CA/04/09-NA and YO/94/15-NA and found 6, 4, and 3 amino acid differences around the enzymatic center of the NA head (blue; positions 199, 240, 247, 321, 372, and 432), on the lateral surface of the NA head (orange; positions 263, 268, 314, and 390), and in the stalk region (not shown in the structure; position 38, 44, and 48), respectively (Figs. 2A and 6B). Then, we performed a cell-based ELISA by using the 22 A(H1N1)pdm2009-positive sera and cells transiently expressing wild-type CA/04/09-NA or its mutants that possessed amino acid changes found in YO/94/15-NA. If the end-point titer of each serum against the mutant NA was at least 4 times lower than that against wild-type NA, we concluded that that mutation affected the antigenicity of NA. Half of the sera (11/22, blue dots) showed reduced reactivity to NA possessing mutations around the enzymatic center (Fig. 6C, left). Two of these sera (2/11) also showed decreased binding to the stalk region mutant (Fig. 6C, right). Two serum samples (2/22) mainly targeted the lateral surface of the NA head (red or orange dot in Fig. 6C, middle) and reacted with the NA mutants of the enzymatic center and stalk region with similar titers. These results indicate that the antigenic drift of NA involves mutations on the lateral surface of the NA head and that the antibodies of some individuals mainly recognize the lateral surface of the NA head.
Furthermore, we investigated whether a single mutation at position 390, which is the key residue for the binding of our mAbs, contributes to the antigenic drift on the lateral surface of the NA head by using a cell-based ELISA. Cells transiently expressing CA/04/09-NA with the N390K mutation as the antigen were incubated with the 22 A(H1N1)pdm2009-positive human sera used in Fig. 6C. We found that one sample (red dot) also showed decreased binding to the N390K mutant (Fig. 6D). These results suggest that the single N390K mutation is partially involved in the NA antigenic drift.
Discussion
Antibodies that inhibit virus sialidase activity are produced in infected individuals and are important for protection against seasonal influenza virus infection (20, 21, 38). To evade such NI antibodies, amino acid mutations are accumulated around the enzymatic center of NA (33, 39). Although many amino acid changes accumulate on the lateral surface of the NA head over time, which is far away from the enzymatic center, the role of these mutations remained unknown (33). Here, we isolated human mAbs that recognize the lateral surface of the NA head of A(H1N1)pdm09 virus isolated during the 2015–2016 influenza season. These anti-NA lateral surface mAbs protected mice from lethal virus infection via their NI activity and/or FcγR-mediated antiviral activity. We also found that some individuals acquire anti-NA lateral surface antibodies after infection and that the antigenicity of the lateral surface of the NA head has changed during A(H1N1)pdm09 virus replication in humans since 2009. Taken together, the findings of this study suggest that anti-NA antibodies similar to our anti-NA antibodies are likely to be involved in the antigenic drift on the lateral surface of the NA head. To reveal whether amino acids are changed frequently at the lateral surface of the NA head, we compared the NA sequences derived from A(H1N1)pdm2009, A(H1N1)pre2009, and A(H3N2) viruses, which were obtained from the Global Initiative on Sharing All Influenza Data (GISAID) database, and then calculated the Shannon entropy to determine the sequence variability. The calculated Shannon entropy was then mapped onto the NA structure (Supplementary Fig. 3). This analysis revealed that amino acid mutations at the lateral surface of the NA head occur in all subtypes of human virus NA at a frequency equal to or higher than that around the enzymatic center. Although further epitope analysis is required to fully understand this phenomenon, the selective pressure of anti-NA lateral surface mAbs due to FcγR-mediated antiviral activity as well as NI activity likely contribute to the antigenic drift at the lateral surface.
Recent studies report that, in vaccinated humans, the levels of anti-NA antibodies correlate with a reduced disease severity score, decreased symptoms, and even a reduction in the duration of virus shedding (20, 40), indicating that anti-NA antibodies are an important mediators of protection against influenza virus infection. Therefore, attention has been paid to the importance of NA in influenza vaccines (9, 16, 17). In this context, antigenic characterization of NA is essential to select appropriate vaccine strains, as has been done with HA. Traditionally, the antigenic properties of NA are evaluated by using the NI assay, which detect mainly antigenic changes caused by amino acid changes around the enzymatic active center and may not detect some changes in the lateral surface of NA. Our results demonstrate that anti-lateral surface mAbs without NI activity are potentially involved in the antigenic drift of NA, suggesting that the traditional NI assays are not sufficient to fully characterize NA antigenicity. To this end, it is vital that we develop a new assay to properly characterize NA antigenicity.
Studying human anti-NA antibodies, DiLillo et al. (22) reported that the broadly reactive mAb clone 1000-3C05, which possesses low NI activity, requires FcγR-mediated effector cell activation to provide in vivo protection, whereas the strain-specific mAb EM-3C02, which possesses high NI activity, does not. Taken together with our results, these findings suggest that human anti-NA antibodies suppress virus pathogenicity by at least two distinct mechanisms: NI activity and FcγR-mediated effector cell activation. An anti-NA mAb with high NI activity could reduce virus spread in vivo mainly via its NI activity, whereas an anti-NA mAb without NI activity could suppress virus replication mainly through FcγR-mediated effector cell activation (e.g., ADCC, ADCP, and/or ADNP). For anti-NA mAbs with low NI activity, both NI activity and FcγR-mediated effector cell activation are required to reduce virus growth in vivo. Thus, the sum of the NI activity and the FcγR-mediated effector cell activation determines the potency of an anti-NA antibody in vivo.
Of the seven anti-NA mAbs isolated, binding to the NA protein of five clones (HP02C70, DA05B02, HP02E74, HP02E63, and HP02B24) was abolished by an amino acid substitution at position 390, located on the lateral surface, and that of two clones (DA05C23 and HP02B69) was eliminated by two amino acid mutations at positions 390 and 432, located on the upper and lateral surfaces. The amino acid at position 390 was essential for recognition. Of the former five mAbs, three (HP02C70, DA05B02, and HP02E74) showed NI activity, whereas the other two (HP02E63 and HP02B24) did not. The mouse mAb clone CD6, which recognizes an epitope located on the lateral surface of NA, possesses potent NI activity (41, 42). Co-crystallization revealed that CD6 could hinder NA activity by either preventing sialic acid substrates from accessing the enzymatic center (due to its size) or by cross-linking adjacent NA tetramers (41). We hypothesize that our anti-NA mAbs (HP02C70, DA05B02, and HP02E74) may inhibit NA activity through a similar mechanism. However, we cannot explain why HP02E63 and HP02B24 do not possess NI activity even though they share the key amino acid for binding. Co-crystallization of NA with these mAbs would help us to understand the lack of NI activity of such mAbs that recognize an epitope on the lateral surface of NA.
In summary, we found that anti-NA mAbs with low or no NI activity can contribute to protection from influenza virus infection. Furthermore, these mAbs are potentially involved in the antigenic drift of NA via FcγR-mediated antiviral activity. These findings suggest that the assessment of antigenic drift by using the NI assay alone is insufficient and that methods that allow us to consider antigenic changes that cannot be detected using NI assays need to be developed for better selection of vaccine candidate strains.
Methods
Ethics.
All experiments were performed in compliance with relevant ethical regulations. Human blood was collected from two volunteers by following a protocol approved by the Research Ethics Review Committee of the Institute of Medical Science, the University of Tokyo. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant. All experiments with mice were performed in accordance with the University of Tokyo’s Regulations for Animal Care and Use and were approved by the Animal Experiment Committee of the Institute of Medical Science, the University of Tokyo.
Cells.
Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells were maintained in Eagle’s minimal essential medium (MEM) containing 5% newborn calf serum (NCS). Human lung carcinoma A549 cells were maintained in Ham’s F-12K medium containing 10% fetal calf serum (FCS). Human embryonic kidney 293T cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) containing 10% FCS. SPYMEG cells (MBL), which are a fusion partner cell line for human hybridoma, were generated by the fusion of the mouse myeloma cell line SP2/0 with the human leukemia cell line MEG-01 and were maintained in DMEM containing 15% FCS (43). These cells were incubated at 37°C under 5% CO2. Expi293F cells (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were maintained in Expi293 Expression Medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 37°C under 8% CO2.
Viruses.
We used the following six A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses, which have been reported previously (44): A/California/04/2009 (CA/04/09; clade 1), A/Hiroshima/66/2011 (clade 5), A/Osaka/83/2011 (clade 7), A/Osaka/33/2013 (clade 6C), A/Osaka/6/2014 (clade 6B), and A/Yokohama/94/2015 (YO/94/15; clade 6B.1). A/Brisbane/59/2007 (H1N1pre2009) and A/Hong Kong/4801/2014 (H3N2) were also used. All viruses were propagated in MDCK cells.
Plasmid-based reverse genetics.
The reassortant viruses, the NA mutant viruses, and the challenge virus were generated by plasmid-based reverse genetics, as described previously (45). For reassortant viruses, two pPol I plasmids encoding the HA and NA segments derived from the YO/94/15 or CA/04/09 viruses and six pPol I plasmids encoding the remaining segments of CA/04/09 virus were used for the plasmid transfection. For preparation of the NA mutant viruses, pPol I plasmids encoding HA and wild-type or mutated NA derived from YO/94/15 virus and six pPol I plasmids encoding the remaining segments of CA/04/09 virus were used. For preparation of the challenge virus, we used pPol I plasmids encoding the HA and NA segments of YO/94/15 virus and six pPol I plasmids encoding the remaining segments of mouse-adapted CA/04/09 (46). These 8 pPol I plasmids along with protein expression plasmids for PB2, PB1, PA, and NP derived from A/Puerto Rico/8/34 were transfected into 293T cells by use of TransIT 293 (Mirus) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. At 48 h post-transfection, the supernatants were harvested and inoculated into MDCK cells. The rescued viruses were sequenced to ensure the absence of unwanted mutations. Primer sequences are available upon request.
Hybridoma generation.
PBMCs were isolated from blood (30 ml) obtained from two volunteers, who were infected with the A(H1N1)pdm09 virus in the 2015–2016 influenza season, by using Ficoll Paque Plus (GE Healthcare). The hybridomas that were generated by fusion of PBMCs with SPYMEG cells were cultured and biologically cloned, as described previously (11). For the screening, we performed an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using purified YO/94/15 virus and CA/04/09 virus as antigens, as described below.
ELISA.
ELISA plates (96-well) were coated with each purified virus. After being blocked with 5 times-diluted Blocking One (Nakarai), these plates were incubated with the culture medium of the hybridomas or 1 μg/mL of purified mAb. A horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-human IgG, Fcγ Fragment-specific antibody (Jackson Immuno-Research) was used as the secondary antibody, and the signal was developed using 3, 3’, 5, 5’-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) (Thermo Fisher Scientific) as the substrate. The reaction was stopped with 2N sulfuric acid, and OD450 values were then measured. OD450 values of 0.1 or more were considered to indicate binding.
Expression and purification of monoclonal human IgG.
Human monoclonal antibodies were expressed by Expi293F cells and purified using a protein A column, as described previously (11, 47).
ELLA.
The inhibition of NA activity was measured by using an enzyme-linked lectin assay (ELLA), as described previously (48). Briefly, two-fold diluted antibodies (4000–7.8 ng/mL) were mixed with a predetermined amount of purified YO/94/15 virus diluted in PBS containing 1% BSA and 0.05% Tween 20 (PBS-T). The mixture was transferred to 96-well plates coated with fetuin (Sigma) and then incubated for 16 h at 37°C. The plates were washed with PBS-T and then peroxidase-conjugated peanut agglutinin (PNA; Sigma) was added to detect galactose exposed by removal of the sialic acids on fetuin. The plates were incubated at room temperature for 2 h in the dark and then washed with PBS-T before the addition of o-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride (OPD) substrate (Sigma). The reaction was stopped by the addition of 1N sulfuric acid and OD490 values were read. The relative NA inhibition (NI) activity was calculated by dividing the OD490 value of the test well by the OD490 value of the “virus only” well and multiplying by 100. The 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) was determined by use of nonlinear regression analysis (GraphPad Prism software) assuming that the molecular weight of the antibody was 150 kDa.
Plaque size reduction assay.
MDCK cells were infected with 100 plaque-forming units (pfu) of YO/94/15 virus for 1 h at 37°C. After removal of the inoculum, the cells were washed with MEM containing 0.3% bovine serum albumin (BSA-MEM) and overlaid with agar containing the indicated amount of the indicated mAb and 1 μg/ml L-(tosylamido-2-phenyl) ethyl chloromethyl ketone (TPCK)-treated trypsin. The cells were incubated at 37°C under 5% CO2 for 2 days and then stained with crystal violet solution to visualize the plaques. The plaque images were obtained by scanning assay plates with a photo scanner (GT-X900, EPSON). The total plaque size of each well was measured using a script written in MATLAB (Mathworks), and the average plaque size was calculated by dividing by the number of plaques. Infected cells overlaid with agar that lacked mAb served as a control. The reduction in plaque size was calculated by dividing the average plaque size in the presence of each mAb by the control plaque size.
ADCC and ADCP reporter assays.
ADCC and ADCP reporter assays were performed by using ADCC and ADCP Reporter Bioassay Kits (Promega), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. ADCC and ADCP signaling activations in effector cells were measured by using two kinds of target cells: A549 cells infected with YO/94/15 virus and 293T cells expressing NA derived from YO/94/15 virus. Briefly, A549 cells were plated at a density of 10,000 cells/well in a flat-bottom white 96-well plate. After 24 h, the cells were infected with YO/94/15 virus at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10. At 12 h post-infection, the cells were used as target cells. For the second kind of target cell, two days before the reporter assays were performed, 293T cells in a 6-well plate were transfected with a plasmid encoding YO/94/15-NA by using Trans-IT 293. The next day, the transfected cells were harvested and seeded at 20,000 cells/well into a white 96-well plate. Twenty-four hours later, the cells were used as target cells. In the ADCC or ADCP reporter assays, the medium of the target cells was replaced with five-fold diluted mAb (10–0.016 μg/ml) in the assay buffer (Promega). ADCC or ADCP Bioassay effector cells (a Jurkat cell line stably expressing human FcγRIIIa or FcγRIIa, human CD3γ, and an NFAT-response element driving expression of a firefly luciferase) were added to the antibody-treated target cells and incubated for 6 h at 37°C. The firefly luciferase activity was then measured using luciferase assay regents (Promega).
In vivo protection test.
Four six-week-old female BALB/c mice (Japan SLC) per group were intraperitoneally injected with PBS or each indicated antibody at 30 mg/kg in 250 μl of PBS. After 24 h, the mice were anesthetized with isoflurane and intranasally challenged with 10 MLD50 (50% mouse lethal dose) of the challenge virus in 50 μl of PBS. Weight was monitored daily for 14 days and mice that lost 25% or more of their initial body weight were scored as dead and euthanized according to institutional guidelines.
Competitive binding assay.
For antigen preparation, 293T cells were transfected with pCAGGS plasmids encoding ebolavirus matrix protein VP40 and each indicated NA by using TransIT 293. After 2 days, the supernatant of the transfected cells was harvested and centrifuged at 28,000 rpm with a 20% sucrose cushion. The pellet containing VP40-induced VLPs presenting NA was resuspended in PBS. ELISA plates were coated overnight at 4°C with 5 μg/ml of the VLPs. After being blocked with 5 times-diluted Blocking One, these plates were incubated with a two-fold diluted cocktail of the seven anti-NA mAbs (DA05C23, HP02C70, DA05B02, HP02B69, HP02E74, HP02E63, and HP02B24) or with individual monoclonal antibodies (HP02E63 or HP02B24), which possessed the Fc region of mouse IgG2a, or with PBS for 1 h. The plates were then washed with PBS-T, followed by the addition of diluted serum samples. The serum samples used in this assay were collected from patients infected with A(H1N1)pdm09 virus during the 2015–2016 influenza season. After 1 h, an HRP-conjugated goat anti-human IgG, Fcγ Fragment-specific antibody was added as the secondary antibody. The plates were incubated for 1 h, and then washed with PBS-T before the addition of the TMB substrate. The reaction was stopped with 2N sulfuric acid, and OD450 values were then measured. The wells to which PBS was added instead of monoclonal antibody served as control wells for each serum sample.
Entropy.
For each amino acid position of the aligned isolate sequences, an entropy value was computed by using the formula −ΣPi × ln(Pi), as described by Chen et al. (49). This formula follows the definition of Shannon entropy (50) that has been used to evaluate diversity. In this study, entropy was used to measure the variability of amino acids at a given position, where i = 1 to 20 represents the 20 different amino acid residues, and Pi represents the probability density of the respective residue. Entropy values range from 0 (only 1 residue present at that position) to 2.996 (all 20 residues are equally represented). The calculation was based on the NA sequences of 19,034 A(H1N1)pdm09 isolates, 4,626 A(H1N1)pre2009 isolates, and 40,516 A(H3N2) isolates obtained from the GISAID database.
Cell-based ELISA.
293T cells were transfected with FLAG-tagged wild-type or mutant NA-expression plasmids or an empty plasmid as a control using TransIT 293. At 48 h after the transfection, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde phosphate buffer solution for 30 min at room temperature. The cells were then washed with PBS-T, and blocked with 5 times-diluted Blocking One for 1 h. The cells were then incubated for 1 h with two-fold diluted serum samples, which were collected from volunteer schoolchildren and their parents who were seropositive for A(H1N1)pdm09 virus between November 2009 and March 2010 (37), followed by incubation for 1 h with an HRP-conjugated goat anti-human IgG, Fcγ Fragment-specific antibody. The signal was developed using TMB as the substrate and stopped with 2N sulfuric acid. OD450 values were then measured. Expression of NA was normalized with an anti-FLAG tag antibody (Wako). The mean OD450 at each dilution was obtained by subtracting the OD450 value for the control well (empty plasmid transfected cells). The end-point titers of serum samples were determined as the reciprocal of the highest dilution providing an OD450 value of greater than 0.1.
KD determination.
KD values were determined from Scatchard plots using ELISA data (51). In the ELISA, VP40-induced VLPs presenting YO/94/15-NA were used as the antigen. After being blocked with 5-times-diluted Blocking One, antigen-coated plates were incubated with the two-fold diluted anti-NA mAb (10–0.005 μg/ml). The HRP-conjugated goat anti-human IgG, Fcγ Fragment-specific antibody was used as the secondary antibody, and the signal was developed using TMB as the substrate. The reaction was stopped with 2N sulfuric acid, and OD450 values were then measured. Based on the OD450 values, the concentrations of antibody bound to antigen and of free antibody were calculated (assuming that the molecular weight of the antibody was 150 kDa). When the ratio of bound to free antibody concentration was plotted against the bound antibody concentration, the negative inverse of the resulting slope was determined as the KD.
Structural analysis.
Amino acid positions were plotted on the crystal structure of the NA protein of CA/04/09, A/Brevig Mission/1/1918 (H1N1pre2009), or A/Memphis/31/1998 (H3N2) (PDB accession code, 4B7R, 3B7E, or 4H53, respectively) by using the PyMOL molecular graphics system.
Statistical analysis.
Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett’s test, one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test, the log-rank test, and Wilcoxon signed rank test were performed using GraphPad Prism software. P values < 0.01 were considered significantly different. No samples were excluded from the analysis.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Patrick C. Wilson for providing us with anti-NA mAbs; Drs. Kiyoko Iwatsuki-Horimoto and Tomohiko Koibuchi for assistance with experiments; Drs. Chiharu Kawakami, Emi Takashita, and Setsuko Nakajima for providing us with influenza viruses; and Dr. Susan Watson for editing the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the Japan Initiative for Global Research Network on Infectious Diseases (J-GRID) from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) (JP18fm0108006), by Leading Advanced Projects for medical innovation (LEAP) from AMED (JP18am001007), by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Science, Sports, and Technology (MEXT) of Japan (Nos. 16H06429, 16K21723, and 16H06434), and by the Center for Research on Influenza Pathogenesis (CRIP) funded by NIAID Contract HHSN272201400008C.
Footnotes
Conflicts of interest
Y.K. has received speaker’s honoraria from Toyama Chemical and Astellas Inc.; has received grant support from Chugai Pharmaceuticals, Daiichi Sankyo Pharmaceutical, Toyama Chemical, Tauns Laboratories, Inc., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Denka Seiken Co., Ltd.; and is a co-founder of FluGen.
Data availability.
All data analyzed during this study are included in this article. The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
- 1.Wilson IA, Skehel JJ, Wiley DC. 1981. Structure of the haemagglutinin membrane glycoprotein of influenza virus at 3 A resolution. Nature 289:366–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Weis W, Brown JH, Cusack S, Paulson JC, Skehel JJ, Wiley DC. 1988. Structure of the influenza virus haemagglutinin complexed with its receptor, sialic acid. Nature 333:426–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Job ER, Bottazzi B, Gilbertson B, Edenborough KM, Brown LE, Mantovani A, Brooks AG, Reading PC. 2013. Serum amyloid P is a sialylated glycoprotein inhibitor of influenza A viruses. PLoS One 8:e59623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Palese P, Tobita K, Ueda M, Compans RW. 1974. Characterization of temperature sensitive influenza virus mutants defective in neuraminidase. Virology 61:397–410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Matrosovich MN, Matrosovich TY, Gray T, Roberts NA, Klenk HD. 2004. Neuraminidase is important for the initiation of influenza virus infection in human airway epithelium. J Virol 78:12665–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Potter CW, Oxford JS. 1979. Determinants of immunity to influenza infection in man. Br Med Bull 35:69–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hobson D, Curry RL, Beare AS, Ward-Gardner A. 1972. The role of serum haemagglutination-inhibiting antibody in protection against challenge infection with influenza A2 and B viruses. J Hyg (Lond) 70:767–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wrammert J, Koutsonanos D, Li GM, Edupuganti S, Sui J, Morrissey M, McCausland M, Skountzou I, Hornig M, Lipkin WI, Mehta A, Razavi B, Del Rio C, Zheng NY, Lee JH, Huang M, Ali Z, Kaur K, Andrews S, Amara RR, Wang Y, Das SR, O’Donnell CD, Yewdell JW, Subbarao K, Marasco WA, Mulligan MJ, Compans R, Ahmed R, Wilson PC. 2011. Broadly cross-reactive antibodies dominate the human B cell response against 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza virus infection. J Exp Med 208:181–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chen YQ, Wohlbold TJ, Zheng NY, Huang M, Huang Y, Neu KE, Lee J, Wan H, Rojas KT, Kirkpatrick E, Henry C, Palm AE, Stamper CT, Lan LY, Topham DJ, Treanor J, Wrammert J, Ahmed R, Eichelberger MC, Georgiou G, Krammer F, Wilson PC. 2018. Influenza infection in humans induces broadly cross-reactive and protective neuraminidase-reactive antibodies. Cell 173:417–429.e10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Knossow M, Skehel JJ. 2006. Variation and infectivity neutralization in influenza. Immunology 119:1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yamayoshi S, Uraki R, Ito M, Kiso M, Nakatsu S, Yasuhara A, Oishi K, Sasaki T, Ikuta K, Kawaoka Y. 2017. A broadly reactive human anti-hemagglutinin stem monoclonal antibody that inhibits influenza A virus particle release. EBioMedicine 17:182–191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Brandenburg B, Koudstaal W, Goudsmit J, Klaren V, Tang C, Bujny MV, Korse HJ, Kwaks T, Otterstrom JJ, Juraszek J, van Oijen AM, Vogels R, Friesen RH. 2013. Mechanisms of hemagglutinin targeted influenza virus neutralization. PLoS One 8:e80034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Skehel JJ, Wiley DC. 2000. Receptor binding and membrane fusion in virus entry: the influenza hemagglutinin. Annu Rev Biochem 69:531–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Schulman JL, Khakpour M, Kilbourne ED. 1968. Protective effects of specific immunity to viral neuraminidase on influenza virus infection of mice. J Virol 2:778–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Webster RG, Laver WG. 1967. Preparation and properties of antibody directed specifically against the neuraminidase of influenza virus. J Immunol 99:49–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wilson JR, Guo Z, Reber A, Kamal RP, Music N, Gansebom S, Bai Y, Levine M, Carney P, Tzeng WP, Stevens J, York IA. 2016. An influenza A virus (H7N9) anti-neuraminidase monoclonal antibody with prophylactic and therapeutic activity in vivo. Antiviral Res 135:48–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wohlbold TJ, Podolsky KA, Chromikova V, Kirkpatrick E, Falconieri V, Meade P, Amanat F, Tan J, tenOever BR, Tan GS, Subramaniam S, Palese P, Krammer F. 2017. Broadly protective murine monoclonal antibodies against influenza B virus target highly conserved neuraminidase epitopes. Nat Microbiol 2:1415–1424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bosch BJ, Bodewes R, de Vries RP, Kreijtz JH, Bartelink W, van Amerongen G, Rimmelzwaan GF, de Haan CA, Osterhaus AD, Rottier PJ. 2010. Recombinant soluble, multimeric HA and NA exhibit distinctive types of protection against pandemic swine-origin 2009 A(H1N1) influenza virus infection in ferrets. J Virol 84:10366–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Seto JT, Chang FS. 1969. Functional significance of sialidase during influenza virus multiplication: an electron microscope study. J Virol 4:58–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Monto AS, Petrie JG, Cross RT, Johnson E, Liu M, Zhong W, Levine M, Katz JM, Ohmit SE. 2015. Antibody to influenza virus neuraminidase: an independent correlate of protection. J Infect Dis 212:1191–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Monto AS, Kendal AP. 1973. Effect of neuraminidase antibody on Hong Kong influenza. Lancet 1:623–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.DiLillo DJ, Palese P, Wilson PC, Ravetch JV. 2016. Broadly neutralizing anti-influenza antibodies require Fc receptor engagement for in vivo protection. J Clin Invest 126:605–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Perussia B, Starr S, Abraham S, Fanning V, Trinchieri G. 1983. Human natural killer cells analyzed by B73.1, a monoclonal antibody blocking Fc receptor functions. I. Characterization of the lymphocyte subset reactive with B73.1. J Immunol 130:2133–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Stuart SG, Simister NE, Clarkson SB, Kacinski BM, Shapiro M, Mellman I. 1989. Human IgG Fc receptor (hFcRII; CD32) exists as multiple isoforms in macrophages, lymphocytes and IgG-transporting placental epithelium. EMBO J 8:3657–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Futosi K, Fodor S, Mócsai A. 2013. Neutrophil cell surface receptors and their intracellular signal transduction pathways. Int Immunopharmacol 17:638–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bournazos S, DiLillo DJ, Ravetch JV. 2015. The role of Fc-FcγR interactions in IgG-mediated microbial neutralization. J Exp Med 212:1361–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Pincetic A, Bournazos S, DiLillo DJ, Maamary J, Wang TT, Dahan R, Fiebiger BM, Ravetch JV. 2014. Type I and type II Fc receptors regulate innate and adaptive immunity. Nat Immunol 15:707–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Laver WG, Air GM, Webster RG, Markoff LJ. 1982. Amino acid sequence changes in antigenic variants of type A influenza virus N2 neuraminidase. Virology 122:450–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Luther P, Bergmann KC, Oxford JS. 1984. An investigation of antigenic drift of neuraminidases of influenza A (H1N1) viruses. J Hyg (Lond) 92:223–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Webster RG, Laver WG, Air GM, Schild GC. 1982. Molecular mechanisms of variation in influenza viruses. Nature 296:115–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Air GM, Els MC, Brown LE, Laver WG, Webster RG. 1985. Location of antigenic sites on the three-dimensional structure of the influenza N2 virus neuraminidase. Virology 145:237–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Colman PM, Varghese JN, Laver WG. 1983. Structure of the catalytic and antigenic sites in influenza virus neuraminidase. Nature 303:41–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Fanning TG, Reid AH, Taubenberger JK. 2000. Influenza A virus neuraminidase: regions of the protein potentially involved in virus-host interactions. Virology 276:417–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Dreyfus C, Laursen NS, Kwaks T, Zuijdgeest D, Khayat R, Ekiert DC, Lee JH, Metlagel Z, Bujny MV, Jongeneelen M, van der Vlugt R, Lamrani M, Korse HJ, Geelen E, Sahin Ö, Sieuwerts M, Brakenhoff JP, Vogels R, Li OT, Poon LL, Peiris M, Koudstaal W, Ward AB, Wilson IA, Goudsmit J, Friesen RH. 2012. Highly conserved protective epitopes on influenza B viruses. Science 337:1343–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Simonelli L, Pedotti M, Beltramello M, Livoti E, Calzolai L, Sallusto F, Lanzavecchia A, Varani L. 2013. Rational engineering of a human anti-dengue antibody through experimentally validated computational docking. PLoS One 8:e55561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wright P, Neumann G, Kawaoka Y. 2007. Orthomyxoviruses. In” Fields Virology”(DM Knipe, and Howley PM, Ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins., Philadelphia. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Iwatsuki-Horimoto K, Horimoto T, Tamura D, Kiso M, Kawakami E, Hatakeyama S, Ebihara Y, Koibuchi T, Fujii T, Takahashi K, Shimojima M, Sakai-Tagawa Y, Ito M, Sakabe S, Iwasa A, Ishii T, Gorai T, Tsuji K, Iwamoto A, Kawaoka Y. 2011. Seroprevalence of pandemic 2009 (H1N1) influenza A virus among schoolchildren and their parents in Tokyo, Japan. Clin Vaccine Immunol 18:860–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Murphy BR, Kasel JA, Chanock RM. 1972. Association of serum anti-neuraminidase antibody with resistance to influenza in man. N Engl J Med 286:1329–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bragstad K, Nielsen LP, Fomsgaard A. 2008. The evolution of human influenza A viruses from 1999 to 2006: a complete genome study. Virol J 5:40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Memoli MJ, Shaw PA, Han A, Czajkowski L, Reed S, Athota R, Bristol T, Fargis S, Risos K, Powers JH, Davey RT, Taubenberger JK. 2016. Evaluation of antihemagglutinin and antineuraminidase antibodies as correlates of protection in an influenza A/H1N1 virus healthy human challenge model. MBio 7:e00417–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wan H, Yang H, Shore DA, Garten RJ, Couzens L, Gao J, Jiang L, Carney PJ, Villanueva J, Stevens J, Eichelberger MC. 2015. Structural characterization of a protective epitope spanning A(H1N1)pdm09 influenza virus neuraminidase monomers. Nat Commun 6:6114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Jiang L, Fantoni G, Couzens L, Gao J, Plant E, Ye Z, Eichelberger MC, Wan H. 2015. Comparative efficacy of monoclonal antibodies that bind to different epitopes of the 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza virus neuraminidase. J Virol 90:117–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kubota-Koketsu R, Mizuta H, Oshita M, Ideno S, Yunoki M, Kuhara M, Yamamoto N, Okuno Y, Ikuta K. 2009. Broad neutralizing human monoclonal antibodies against influenza virus from vaccinated healthy donors. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 387:180–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Yasuhara A, Yamayoshi S, Soni P, Takenaga T, Kawakami C, Takashita E, Sakai-Tagawa Y, Uraki R, Ito M, Iwatsuki-Horimoto K, Sasaki T, Ikuta K, Yamada S, Kawaoka Y. 2017. Diversity of antigenic mutants of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus escaped from human monoclonal antibodies. Sci Rep 7:17735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Neumann G, Watanabe T, Ito H, Watanabe S, Goto H, Gao P, Hughes M, Perez DR, Donis R, Hoffmann E, Hobom G, Kawaoka Y. 1999. Generation of influenza A viruses entirely from cloned cDNAs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:9345–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Sakabe S, Ozawa M, Takano R, Iwastuki-Horimoto K, Kawaoka Y. 2011. Mutations in PA, NP, and HA of a pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza virus contribute to its adaptation to mice. Virus Res 158:124–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Yamayoshi S, Ito M, Uraki R, Sasaki T, Ikuta K, Kawaoka Y. 2017. Human protective monoclonal antibodies against the HA stem of group 2 HAs derived from an H3N2 virus-infected human. J Infect doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2017.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Couzens L, Gao J, Westgeest K, Sandbulte M, Lugovtsev V, Fouchier R, Eichelberger M. 2014. An optimized enzyme-linked lectin assay to measure influenza A virus neuraminidase inhibition antibody titers in human sera. J Virol Methods 210:7–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Chen GW, Chang SC, Mok CK, Lo YL, Kung YN, Huang JH, Shih YH, Wang JY, Chiang C, Chen CJ, Shih SR. 2006. Genomic signatures of human versus avian influenza A viruses. Emerg Infect Dis 12:1353–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Shannon CE. 2001. A mathematical theory of communication. ACM SIGMOBILE mobile computing and communications review 5:3–55. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Ottaviano Y, Gerace L. 1985. Phosphorylation of the nuclear lamins during interphase and mitosis. J Biol Chem 260:624–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data analyzed during this study are included in this article. The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
