Skip to main content
American Journal of Human Genetics logoLink to American Journal of Human Genetics
. 2000 Mar 22;66(4):1199–1210. doi: 10.1086/302855

Genomic Structure and Identification of Novel Mutations in Usherin, the Gene Responsible for Usher Syndrome Type IIa

M D Weston 1,,*, J D Eudy 2,,*, S Fujita 3, S-F Yao 2, S Usami 4, C Cremers 5, J Greenburg 6, R Ramesar 6, A Martini 7, C Moller 8, R J Smith 9, J Sumegi 2, William J Kimberling 1
PMCID: PMC1288187  PMID: 10729113

Abstract

Usher syndrome type IIa (USHIIa) is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by moderate to severe sensorineural hearing loss and progressive retinitis pigmentosa. This disorder maps to human chromosome 1q41. Recently, mutations in USHIIa patients were identified in a novel gene isolated from this chromosomal region. The USH2A gene encodes a protein with a predicted molecular weight of 171.5 kD and possesses laminin epidermal growth factor as well as fibronectin type III domains. These domains are observed in other protein components of the basal lamina and extracellular matrixes; they may also be observed in cell-adhesion molecules. The intron/exon organization of the gene whose protein we name “Usherin” was determined by direct sequencing of PCR products and cloned genomic DNA with cDNA-specific primers. The gene is encoded by 21 exons and spans a minimum of 105 kb. A mutation search of 57 independent USHIIa probands was performed with a combination of direct sequencing and heteroduplex analysis of PCR-amplified exons. Fifteen new mutations were found. Of 114 independent USH2A alleles, 58 harbored probable pathologic mutations. Ten cases of USHIIa were true homozygotes and 10 were compound heterozygotes; 18 heterozygotes with only one identifiable mutation were observed. Sixty-five percent (38/58) of cases had at least one mutation, and 51% (58/114) of the total number of possible mutations were identified. The allele 2299delG (previously reported as 2314delG) was the most frequent mutant allele observed (16%; 31/192). Three new missense mutations (C319Y, N346H, and C419F) were discovered; all were restricted to the previously unreported laminin domain VI region of Usherin. The possible significance of this domain, known to be necessary for laminin network assembly, is discussed in the context of domain VI mutations from other proteins.

Introduction

Usher syndrome (MIM 276900), an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by moderate to profound sensorineural hearing loss and retinitis pigmentosa (RP), is the most frequent cause of combined deafness and blindness in the industrialized world. The incidence of Usher syndrome in the United States is estimated at 4.4/100,000 (Boughman et al. 1983). The syndrome is both clinically and genetically heterogeneous and has been divided into three clinical subtypes, types I, II (MIM 276901), and III (MIM 276902; Smith et al. 1994). The subtypes differ in the degree of hearing loss and in the presence or absence of vestibular abnormalities. Usher type I patients are profoundly deaf and have absent vestibular responses, whereas Usher type II patients suffer from moderate to severe hearing loss and have normal vestibular responses. Usher type III patients exhibit progressive hearing loss and variable vestibular abnormalities. In all forms of Usher syndrome, the hearing loss is accompanied by progressive RP.

At present, 10 distinct genetic loci have been identified for the three clinical Usher phenotypes: 6 loci correspond to the Usher type I phenotype, 3 for the Usher type II phenotype, and 1 for Usher type III (Kimberling et al. 1990; Kaplan et al. 1992; Kimberling and Smith 1992; Smith et al. 1992; Keats et al. 1994; Sankila et al. 1995; Wayne et al. 1996, 1997; Chaib et al. 1997; Hmani et al. 1999; Pieke-Dahl et al., in press). Although it was originally believed that the Usher syndrome type I phenotype was the most common form of Usher syndrome, our experience is that the Usher type II phenotype accounts for more than half of Usher cases. Most Usher type II families show linkage to the type IIa locus on 1q41, and the gene responsible for Usher syndrome type IIa (USH2A) has recently been identified (Eudy et al. 1998). Although the function of the protein (named “Usherin”) is unknown, Usherin has a predicted molecular weight of 171.5 kD and has significant sequence similarity to a number of extracellular matrix proteins and receptors containing laminin-like epidermal growth factor and fibronectin type III repeats.

A comprehensive mutation-detection strategy for differential diagnosis of patients with Usher syndrome requires knowledge of the genomic organization of the USH2a gene, USH2A. In this report we describe the intron/exon genomic organization and sequence of the USH2A gene, from which a set of 21 primer pairs suitable for mutation testing was developed. Heteroduplex and direct sequencing analyses of the DNA from 57 independent USHIIa patients were performed to determine the frequency and distribution of USH2A mutations.

Methods

Genomic Structure

To identify and isolate bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs) containing the USH2A gene, BAC libraries from Genome Systems and Research Genetics were screened with PCR by use of primer pairs from the critical region of the USH2A gene; these were listed in the database maintained by the Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research/MIT Center for Genome Research. We obtained additional sequence-tagged sites by sequencing the ends of the BACs obtained from the initial BAC library screening.

PCR Conditions

Oligonucleotide primers were designed from the consensus sequence of the USH2A cDNA sequence and used for PCR and cycle-sequencing reactions. BAC clones were grown in 100 ml of Luria-Bertani broth supplemented with 12.5 mg/ml chloramphenicol overnight and purified with Qiagen tip 100 columns. Human genomic DNA was isolated from whole blood with a Puregene kit (Gentra Systems).

Primer combinations for PCR reactions with Taq Gold (Perkin Elmer) or Elongase (Gibco-BRL) were tested with human genomic DNA and BAC clones as templates. PCR reactions were as follows: 10 ng BAC or 200 ng human genomic DNA, 1× reaction buffer, 0.2 mM each dNTP, 2.0 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM each primer; 95°C for 10 min followed by 37 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 2 min. Elongase enzyme reactions were as follows: 10 ng BAC or 200 ng human genomic DNA, 1× reaction buffer, 0.2 mM each dNTP, 1.5 mM or 2.0 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM each primer for genomic templates, and 0.4 mM each primer for BAC templates; 94°C for 30 s followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 10 min.

DNA Sequencing

PCR products were purified and concentrated prior to sequencing by Microcon 100 filters (Ambion). ABI Prism BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction kits (Perkin Elmer) were used to generate sequence from both purified PCR products and BAC DNA templates. PCR products were sequenced with 4 pmol Usherin-specific primers and 4 ml ready-reaction mix in a total volume of 10 ml for 25 cycles of 95°C for 10 s, 50°C for 5 s, and 60°C for 4 min. BAC DNA (500 ng–2 mg) was sequenced in 20-ml reaction volumes by 30 pmol of SP6, T7 pBELOBAC11 vector primers or USH2A primers, 8 ml ready-reaction mix in a total volume of 20 ml for 95°C for 5 min followed by 99 cycles of 95°C for 20 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 60°C for 4 min. Sequencing reactions were precipitated and resuspended in a 5:1 ratio of formamide/dye loading buffer (6 ml for PCR products and 2 ml for BAC DNA). Two microliters were loaded onto 4.8% (36-cM plates) or 5.25% (48-cM plates) PAGE-PLUS™ (Amresco) sequencing gels and run on the ABI Prism model 377 DNA sequencer according to ABI protocols. Sample files were generated from gel files by ABI Sequencing Analysis 3.0. Fractura 2.0 (ABI) was used to remove vector and ambiguous sequences. Contig assembly was performed by the AUTOASSEMBLER program (ABI).

Mutation Screening

Table 1 lists the intronic primers used in this study and the amplification sizes of their PCR products surveyed for mutations. A set of 95 anonymous control DNA samples was also screened to assess the frequency of USH2A mutations in a population unaffected by USHIIA.

Table 1.

USH2A Primers Used in Mutation Analysis of 57 USHIIa Patients

PrimerSet Primer Sequence ExonAmpli-fied PCRSize(bp)
Exon1U AATGGATTGAGGTGCATGAG 1 525
Exon1L ACCCAACACCATCTGTCTGT
Exon2U GCCTGGGATGAGCTTCAG 2 840
Exon2L GGTTTGGAATTCAGGCTGA
Exon3U CACCACTGTAACTGCACAATACC 3 344
Exon3L CTGCTGCAGATTTTGTGAGTAGA
Exon4U GTCTTCCCAGCTGAACAAAGTA 4 375
Exon4L GTGGTAATTTGTTCAGTAGCCCTAG
Exon5U GTCAGGTATTGCTTGGTAAACAG 5 173
Exon5L CAGCATTTATCCTTTCGGTTC
Exon6U TGACATTCATTTGTAACGACTCC 6 442
Exon6L AAGTTTGTGGGCATTTGTTG
Exon7U CCATGGTTTGATATATACTGATGG 7 336
Exon7L CACCAGCCTAGAGAGCTAGC
Exon8U CAACATTTTGATTTCTGTTTTGC 8 370
Exon8L TGCTCTGACATCTTAATGTGCT
Exon9U CACACAATGCATATAGTCCTAGG 9 267
Exon9L TGTTAGGCCAAGATTAAGTTCAT
Exon10U TGATATGTGCTTTACTTCTGGTG 10 356
Exon10L GCATTGTAGATAGAAGCACACAG
Exon11U TGGCAGGTAGAGATGAAAGG 11 371
Exon11L GCAAATGCAGTCTTCAATTCTAC
Exon12U CCCTGTCTTGTACCTAATGAGC 12 323
Exon12L TTCCAGATGGTAATAGAGATGTGA
Exon13U GCAGTAGCATTGTTTGTGTCTC 13 816
Exon13L GTAGAAGCCACAAACCAGAAAC
Exon14U GGGAATTAGTGCCTTGGTAGAG 14 379
Exon14L GAAGTTATTGCTTTGCAACTGC
Exon15U AAGCCGTCTTACTCTACAATGCT 15 360
Exon15L TTCTGATGGGTTCTAAATGGAG
Exon16U GCAATCCTGAATCAGAAAGACC 16 354
Exon16L CCACAACAGCATTTATCCTCAA
Exon17U GAGAGGAAAGCAGTTAGCAATG 17 626
Exon17L GATTCTCATTCATGTCTTGACCA
Exon18U AAGTAACCCCTTTGTCTGATGAGT 18 378
Exon18L GGAAACATTTGCATTCAGAGG
Exon19U TCAGAAACTAAATGAATGTGTGA 19 379
Exon19L TGCCCTGTTTAATCAATATAGAG
Exon20U TGGTGGTTGGCAATAATTCC 20 381
Exon20L GAGTTAGTGAGGGAGGAGAAGACA
Exon21U AGCCATACAGATACTTGAAACC 21 501
Exon21L GCTATCAAAGGGCTGAATTAG

Heteroduplex Analysis

PCR products amplified from samples taken from USHIIa probands and cloned control DNA were mixed, heated at 95°C for 3 min, and cooled to 25°C over a 45-min period. The reannealed reaction products were then electrophoresed through 35 cm × 43 cm × 1 mm 1× MDE™ (FMC) at 850 V for 18–24 h, stained with 1 mg/ml ethidium bromide, and visualized under ultraviolet light. Mixing with control PCR DNA prior to heteroduplex formation was done to allow detection of both homozygous and heterozygous mutations.

Direct Link Sequencing

Five-microliter PCR products were treated with 10 U of shrimp alkaline phosphatase (SAP; Amersham) for 30 min at 37°C, and the enzyme was inactivated at 80°C for 15 min. SAP was used to dephosphorylate unincorporated dNTPs prior to cycle sequencing. Sequencing reactions contained 2.8 ml of the BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction mix (Perkin Elmer), 2.5 ml SAP-treated PCR product, and 20 pmol primer. Cycling conditions were 30 cycles of 95°C for 10 s, 55°C for 5 s, and 60°C for 4 min. Sequencing reactions were precipitated in 60% ethyl alcohol (final), dried, and resuspended in 4 ml of a 5:1 ratio of formamide/loading dye. One microliter was loaded onto 4.8% PAGE-PLUS™ (Amresco) 36-cm sequencing gels and run on the ABI Prism model 377 DNA sequencer according to ABI protocols. Sample files were generated from gel files by ABI Sequencing Analysis 3.3. The Fractura 2.2 program was used to remove ambiguous sequences and identify heterozygous base positions. Sequence data were aligned and analyzed for mutations by Sequence Navigator 1.0.1.

Comparative Analysis

A total of 32 proteins bearing laminin domain VI motifs were used to evaluate the functional significance of the three missense mutations found within domain VI of Usherin (see fig. 4 below). The first 300 amino acids from each of these protein sequences were compared with amino acids 250–550 of the Usherin protein by a progressive pairwise alignment strategy by the MULTIALIGN program (Pôle Bio-Informatique Lyonnais; Corpet 1988).

Figure 4.

Figure  4

A portion of an aligned set of laminin domain VI regions from representative proteins for the evaluation of three Usherin missense mutations. The MULTIALIGN program generated a multiple alignment by use of 32 different domain VI–containing sequences with a progressive pairwise alignment strategy (Corpet 1988). Twenty sequences, representing the three classes of domain VI–bearing laminin subunits (α, β, and γ) and netrins were chosen for display in this figure. Protein name and amino acid numbering are to the left of the lineup, and GenBank or SwissProt accession numbers are to the right. Included at the bottom of the protein lineup are the locations of relevant mutations (see Discussion section) within domain VI of UNC-6 (ev437, rh46, and ev436hs), LAMB3 (E210K), LAMA1 (dy2j), and Usherin (C319Y, N346H, and C419F, in bold). The locations of netrin-specific cysteines are shown by arrows (Wadsworth et al. 1996). Dark-shaded residues are >90% conserved in all 32 aligned sequences. Light-shaded residues are conserved 50%–90% in all 32 aligned sequences. Both the C319Y and C419F mutations involve cysteine residues absolutely conserved in the type VI domains of these proteins. The N346H mutation occurs at a nonconserved residue. Note, however, the alignment identity of the asparagine residue with LMG1_HUMAN, LML1_CAEEL, and all examples of netrin proteins with the exception of NET3_MOUSE.

Results

Genomic Structure

Figure 1 presents an ∼325-kb contig assembly across the region that contains the human USH2A gene. Amplification products produced by Elongase by primers specific for both USH2A cDNA and BAC DNA corresponded to seven fragments containing the following exons with their intervening introns: 1–3, 5–8, 10–11, 12–13, 17–18, 18–19, and 19–20. The intron sizes were estimated by agarose gel electrophoresis or were sequenced (IVS1, -6, -7, and -17). Attempts to amplify the following introns were unsuccessful: 3, 4, 8, 9, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, and 20. Intron/exon boundaries were determined initially by manual inspection of sequence data, then confirmed by direct sequencing of PCR products from BAC DNA by USH2A cDNA primers. The initial determination of intron/exon boundaries was by manual inspection of sequence data. All boundaries were found to be consistent with the invariant intronic AG and GT features that flank the beginning and end of the majority of vertebrate exons, respectively. The contig assembly program AUTOASSEMBLER (ABI) was used on all sequence data generated. Seventeen separate sequence contigs from an input of 174 sequence files were generated and used to confirm the genomic organization. The total length of the 17 contigs was 33.6 kb.

Figure 1.

Figure  1

BAC/PAC contig of the USH2A critical region on chromosome 1q41 developed from the use of sequence tagged sites and expressed sequence tags from the region (see Results section). The location and orientation of the 21 USH2A exons within the contig is shown. Those portions of the gene that are not shaded black are untranslated, as predicted from the cDNA sequence.

The Usherin gene is encoded by 21 exons (fig. 1). Table 2 lists the sizes and starting positions of each of the 21 exons, the surrounding intronic sequence, intron sizes (where known), and GenBank accession numbers from the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Reliable genomic sequence extends 667 nt 5′ from the start of the cDNA sequence. The last genomic contig extends 605 bp 3′ from the published end of USH2A.

Table 2.

Intron/Exon Boundaries for the 21 Exons of the Usherin Gene

Exon ExonLength cDNA Start 5′ Acceptor Slice Site 3′ Donor Splice Site GenBankAccessionNumber IntronLength IVS
1 182 1 Not applicable aagaaatggtaactcagcttattt AF091873 673 bp 1
2 688 183 cgtttttgattcccagATACCAGC GGTGTAATgtaagtagtagtgtag AF091873 ∼3 kb 2
3 166 871 ccggttgcttcctaagGTGTGTTA GTGTGCAGgtgagtaaaataaaaa AF091874 … 3
4 133 1037 tggtaatttcttacagGTGCATCA TTTAAATGgtaagtttctgacttc AF091875 … 4
5 64 1170 atgtgtgtatttgcagGTTTAGAG ACAAACAGgtaagcagatgttgca AF091876 ∼2.1 kb 5
6 295 1234 ctcttgactcccacagAGAGATTC AGTATCAGgtaatgagaaacgata AF091877 952 bp 6
7 185 1529 aactttccattttcagGTGTTTTA CTTTCCAAgtatgaatatttttaa AF091877 472 bp 7
8 222 1714 tttctttcattaacagTTTTACTC AGTGGGAGgtattattatgaattt AF091877 … 8
9 94 1936 atgctcatgtttgcagATGTCAGT GACTTCATgtgagttctattttat AF091878 … 9
10 196 2030 atattttttgttctagTGTGATCG CACTACAGgtaagtagcaaataaa AF091879 ∼2.8 kb 10
11 131 2226 cctttccctgatgcagGAAGGAAC GTGATCAGgtgagtttttctgagt AF091880 … 11
12 196 2357 gttgtatcttctctagATTGGAGG CGTTATTGgtacgtgtaacgcaaa AF091881 ∼3 kb 12
13 642 2553 tatattttatctttagGGCTTAGG TCAACCAGgtaagaaagaaatgta AF091882 … 13
14 184 3195 atttctttatttctagGTTTTTAT ACTGGAAGgtacatctttataagc AF091883 … 14
15 164 3379 tttgccttgttttcagATGTCAGC CAGCAAAAgtaagtgaactctggt AF091884 … 15
16 159 3543 cttcattgtaatttagCTCCATTC CCCATACAgtgagtttaagggttt AF091885 … 16
17 495 3702 tttcttttcatttcagGTATTCAA ACTAAATGgtaagaatccaaggct AF091886 1,045 bp 17
18 270 4197 tatttaatgtctctagGAATAATT AGAATCAGgtaaagatcaatgttt AF091886 ∼2 kb 18
19 170 4467 ttgttctcattgatagCACCTGTA TTTCACAGgtattgttatttttaa AF091887 ∼6 kb 19
20 145 4637 cttttttgccttgaagCTGTTGCA AGCAGCAGgtaagcaagttttaat AF091888 … 20
21 1531+ 4782 gttttctaatatttagCACCAGCA Not applicable AF091889 …

A significant sequence difference between the published cDNA and genomic DNA concerns the ATG translation start site. A stretch of five thymidines was previously observed to start at cDNA position +5 relative to the ATG start site; this was found to be six thymidines on all other genomic-based templates. The additional thymidine removes five amino acids from the beginning of the cDNA's longest open-reading frame (fig. 2A). A reexamination of the USH2A cDNA primary sequence data for this region revealed that the cDNA does contain six thymidines, in complete agreement with the genomic sequence. The poly-A tail of the cDNA sequence corresponds to a 20-nt imperfect poly-A stretch interrupted by 2 Gs in the genomic sequence (fig. 2B). It is likely that the true 3′ end occurs downstream of this imperfect poly-A feature. A potential polyadenylation signal (aataaa) was found 340 nucleotides 3′ from the end of the poly-A feature. The SignalP program (SignalP V1.1 World Wide Web Prediction Server, Center for Biological Sequence Analysis) predicted that the first 31 aa of Usherin would be a eukaryotic signal peptide (Nielsen et al. 1997). Therefore, the change in primary structure of Usherin from that previously reported (Eudy et al. 1998) does not alter the predicted role of this motif as a signal peptide for potential transport into the extracellular space. The sequence difference reduces the total length of the Usherin protein from 1551 to 1546 amino acids and results in a change of nomenclature for reported mutations; thus, the 2314delG (E772FS) mutation that we previously reported has become 2299delG (E767FS).

Figure 2.

Figure  2

Significant sequence differences between the previously reported cDNA (GenBank accession number AF055580) and genomic DNA (GenBank accession numbers AF091873 and AF091889) at the 5′ and 3′ ends of the Usherin gene. A, The genomic structure predicts a start methionine five codons downstream from the ATG predicted by the published cDNA sequence because of an insertion of a T residue. A reexamination of the primary cDNA sequence data agrees with the genomic DNA data. This predicts a 1546-aa protein. B, At the 3′ end of the gene, a potential polyadenylation signal (aataaa) was found 340 nt 3′ from the end of a 20-nt imperfect poly-A region found in the genomic sequence that otherwise lines up with the end of the USH2A cDNA.

Mutations

Table 1 provides the primers, designed from intronic sequence, that were used in the mutation testing we describe here. Exons 1, 2, 5, 13, 17, and 21 were surveyed for mutations by direct sequencing. Exons 3, 14, 16, and 19 were screened by heteroduplex analysis, and heteroduplex-positive samples were sequenced to identify the mutation. To compare the sensitivity of the two methods for the detection of USH2A mutations, exons 4, 6–12, 15, 18, and 20 were screened by both methods.

Seven sequence changes—373A→G, 802G→A, 779T→G, 3883C→T, IVS15+35A→G, 4510–4511insA, and 4457A→G—were found by sequence analysis. Twenty-four sequence changes were observed first by heteroduplex analysis. In instances where PCR DNA was subjected to both heteroduplex analysis and sequencing, the detection rate for heteroduplex analysis was 92% of that of direct sequencing. Heteroduplex analysis did not detect any mutations not observed by direct sequencing. Thus, direct sequencing is more sensitive than the heteroduplex method at picking up mutations.

Table 3 lists 31 different nucleotide changes that were observed in this sample and gives their frequencies in the patients with Usher II and unaffected control patients; table 3 also identifies the restriction enzymes that we used to verify the base changes. The frequency of USH2A mutations detected is 58 of 114 USH2A alleles (51%). The number of USHIIa cases homozygous for mutations is 10, the number of compound heterozygotes is 10, and the number of cases with only one identified mutant allele is 18. USH2A mutations were not detected in 19 patients with Usher II. These proportions lead us to estimate that we have detected 69% of the true USH2A mutations and that 4 of the 19 individuals with no observed mutation harbor a change in USH2A that remains to be identified. This further leads us to conclude that ∼26% (15/57) of the families with USH2A in this sample are not linked to USH2A. This value corresponds well with an estimate, obtained by heterogeneity analysis of linkage marker data (Pieke-Dahl et al. 1997) 18% of cases are not linked to 1q41.

Table 3.

DNA Sequence Changes in USH2A[Note]

Exon Base Change Codon Change Frequency inUSH2A Patients FamilyOrigin Frequencyin Controlsa Predicted Pathology RestrictionEnzymeb
DNA sequence changes in Usherin believed  not to be pathologic:
 2 c.373A→G T125A 27/94 … …c None …
 4 IVS3-80T→C … 9/94 … 14/190 ? MseI = N
 5 c.802G→A G268R 1/94 … ? …
 7 IVS7+36-39del gatt … 11/94d … 14/190 ? BsrI = Y
 8 c.1419C→T T473T 22/94 … … None …
 9 IVS9+34C→A … 34/94 … … None …
 11 c.1931A→T D644V 11/94d … 18/190 None MaeIII = Y
 12 c.2109T→C D703D 1/94 … 3/188 ? FokI = N
 14 c.2880T→C N960N 1/192e … 0/190 ? …
 15 IVS15+35A→G … 38/94 … … None …
 18 IVS17-8T→G … 25/94 … …c None …
 18 c.3945C→T N1315N 5/94 … 2/190 ? NsiI = N
 20 c.4371G→A S1457S 4/94 … 3/188 ? Eco57I = Y
 21 c.4457A→G K1486R 35/94 … 76/188 None AflII = N
Probable pathologic mutations   in Usherin:
 4 c.779T→G L260X 1/94 Swedish … Nonsense …
 6 c.921-922insCAGC H308FS 2/94 American … Frameshift …
 6 c.956G→A C319Y 2/94 American 0/190 Missense BsmI = N
 6 c.1042A→C N346H 2/94 Swedish, American 0/190 Missense MlnI = Y
 7 c.1227G→A W409X 3/94 Dutch … Nonsense …
 7 c.1256G→T C419F 5/94d Dutch 0/190 Missense ApoI = Y
 10 c.1679delC P560FS 1/94 American … Frameshift …
 10 c.1696C→T Q566X 1/94 Swedish … Nonsense MseI = Y
 11 c.1876C→T R626X 1/94 American … Nonsense …
 12 c.2052A→G Q684Q 2/192e American 0/190 Cryptic splicing …
 13 c.2299delG E767FS 31/192e Many 0/190 Frameshift …
 13 c.2541C→A C847X 1/94 American … Nonsense …
 14 c.2898delG T967FS 2/192e Spanish 0/190 Frameshift …
 18 c.3840-41GA→CT MR1280IX 1/94 American … Nonsense …
 18 c.3883C→T R1295X 1/94 Swedish … Nonsense …
 20 c.4338-9delCT C1447FS 1/192e American 0/190 Frameshift …
 21 c.4510-4511insA R1504FS 1/94 American … Frameshift …

Note.— An ellipsis (…) = not applicable; a question mark (?) = unknown.

a

A plate of 95 normal controls was screened for the presence of the mutation.

b

If the restriction enzyme equals Y, the enzyme will cleave the rarer variant. If N, the enzyme will cleave the common allele.

c

These polymorphisms were identified from the sequences of various BAC clones.

d

These changes were observed in cis (disequilibrium) within the USHIIa group.

e

Portions of exons 12, 13, 14, and 20 were originally screened by heteroduplex analysis in 96 USHIIa and 95 control samples (Eudy et al. 1998).

The locations of the 17 pathologic mutations on a motif-based map of the Usherin protein are summarized in figure 3. The protein has one laminin type VI domain, 10 laminin-like epidermal growth factor domains, and four fibronectin type III domains. It is of interest that the three probable pathologic missense mutations are limited to the domain VI region. All the other pathologic mutations we observed produced nonsense codons, frame shifts of mRNA translation, or splice mutations.

Figure 3.

Figure  3

Linear structure of Usherin showing the significant domains. The protein has one laminin type VI domain, 10 laminin-like epidermal growth factor domains, and four fibronectin type III domains. Numbers below the figure are amino acid positions for each motif. The relative locations of 17 pathologic mutations from an analysis of 57 individuals with USHIIa are shown above the figure. Three missense mutations, all within domain VI, were discovered. Q684Q creates a punitive cryptic 5′ splice acceptor site. The other mutations produce frame shifts of mRNA translation or encode nonsense codons.

Nonsense Mutations

Seven stop mutations distributed throughout the Usherin gene were observed. None were observed in the series of 95 controls. All individuals had a typical type II phenotype.

The 779T→G (L260X) mutation was observed in a Swedish type II family as a compound heterozygote with the 2299delG mutation discussed below. A G→A transition was seen at bp 1227 in exon 7 (W409X) in two apparently unrelated Dutch families, one homozygous and the other a compound heterozygote with 1256G→T (C419F). In exon 10, a 1696C→T (Q566X) mutation was observed in one Swedish family as a heterozygote. A 1876C→T (R626X) mutation in exon 11 was observed in an American family of mixed northern European ancestry that also carried a 2299del mutation. The 2541C→A (C847X) mutation in exon 13 was observed with the 2299delG allele as a compound heterozygote in an American family with African heritage. There were two stop mutations in exon 18; one is an unusual double transversion 3840-41GA→CT (MR1280IX), and the other is 3883C→T (R1295X). The double transversion occurred in an American family with European ancestry. R1295X was seen in the heterozygous state in one sibship of a large Swedish family with three involved sibships; for both families, the companion mutation was not detected.

Frameshift Mutations

Five mutations cause frameshifts with premature termination. The first, a four-base insertion in exon 6, 921-922insCAGC (H308FS), was observed in two compound heterozygotes. The families were reportedly unrelated, but both were of English-Scottish ancestry. One family segregated the 2299delG mutation on the other allele; the other inherited a novel 2052A→G (Q684Q) maternal allele that could create a possible cryptic splice acceptor site 81 nt 3′ of the normal splice acceptor site inside exon 12. One additional 2052A→G allele from an unrelated USHIIa patient was observed; this mutation was not observed in any of the 95 control samples by heteroduplex analysis. A 1679delC (P560FS) mutation occurred in combination with 2299delG in an individual who has mixed northern European ancestry. One consanguineous individual from Venezuela was homozygous for 2898delG (T967FS), causing a frameshift starting at codon 967. A deletion of 2 bp, 4338-9delCT (Q1447FS), was observed in a French Acadian family with a well-documented Usher II phenotype. Although the parents of the affected children are believed to be distantly related, the children are predicted to be compound heterozygote, with the companion mutation still undetected.

The most common Usherin mutation was 2299delG (E767FS). We have observed this mutation in 31 of 192 alleles. The increase in the total number of patients tested for this mutation as well as portions of exons 12, 13, 14, and 20 is due to our previous work (Eudy et al. 1998). This mutation occurred among USHIIa patients with a variety of ancestries, but all were European. The single exception was the 2299delG/C840X compound heterozygote with African heritage, discussed above.

Splicing Mutations

To evaluate the 2052A→G (Q684Q) mutation, we used the FITCONSENSUS program from the GCG package to calculate quality scores for the authentic exon 12 acceptor site and the potential cryptic site created by the mutation with the eukaryotic 3′ splice acceptor consensus table (Mount 1982). The normal splice site quality score was 42.89; the Q684Q mutation score was 42.28. This mutation was absent from the 95 control samples; however, its potential to produce aberrant splice products has not been tested by reverse transcriptase–PCR methods. The other nonpathologic alterations from table 3, namely 2109T→C (D703D) and 4371G→A (S1457S), were also checked for potential splicing effects by FITCONSENSUS. No significant changes in the quality scores for the natural splice sites in these exons was observed. The 4371G→A does creates a new AG site in exon 20, but the quality score calculated from FITCONSENSUS at this potential cryptic acceptor site was 37.67, well below that of the natural site (44.28). In addition, restriction digests of PCR products from the 95 normal controls indicated that 2109T→C and 4371G→A are both present (table 3).

Missense Mutations

Seven different amino acid changes were observed in the sample groups. Three of these, 373A→G (T125A), 1931A→T (D644V), and 4457A→G (K1486R), are clearly polymorphic, as indicated on the basis of their frequency in the USHIIa population or the normal controls (table 3). In addition, both alleles of the 373A→G polymorphism were observed from BAC clone sequences of exon 2. The 802G→A (G268R) change was observed in a Swedish family in which inheritance of the gene was maternal. We were not able to test for the presence of G268R in the control samples, because this change did not produce a heteroduplex pattern and no restriction sites were altered by it. However, exon 5 DNA sequence from amplified gorilla DNA was homozygous for the rare human variant (unpublished observations), and so this base change is not considered likely to be pathologic.

The three missense mutations in USH2A, 956G→A (C319Y), 1042A→C (N346H), and 1256G→T (C419F) (fig. 3), all are located within domain VI and are absent from 95 control samples (fig. 3). The first, C319Y, was observed to be homozygous in the proband of a Hispanic American family with no family history of consanguinity. N346H was observed in the same large Swedish family described above that segregated 1295X. The N346H mutation was also observed in an American family as a compound heterozygote with 2299delG. The C419F mutation was observed exclusively in five Dutch families. Three of five Dutch families were simple heterozygotes, two were compound heterozygotes, and one carried 2299delG and the other W409X.

To evaluate the potential impact of these substitutions on the Usherin protein, a multiple sequence alignment was generated by 32 protein sequences with type VI domains, to identify conserved residues. A portion of the aligned set of laminin type VI globular domains from representative proteins and the locations of the three Usherin missense mutations is shown in figure 4. The C319Y and C419F mutations involve cysteine residues absolutely conserved in the type VI domains of these proteins. The N346H mutation occurs at a nonconserved residue, but the alignment identity of the asparagine residue with human laminin γ1, Caenorhabditis elegans laminin-like protein-1, human netrin-1, and C. elegans UNC6 suggests that this residue is also functionally conserved.

Disequilibrium

A 1931A→T polymorphism causes a nonconservative amino acid change, D644V, in the third laminin-like epidermal growth factor (L-EGF) domain of Usherin. The polymorphism was observed in the USH2a population as two D644V homozygotes and seven D644V heterozygotes, for a gene frequency of .096. In the control population, one homozygote and 16 heterozygotes were found, resulting in a gene frequency of .094. The C419F mutation appears to be in disequilibrium with D644V, because all five Dutch C419F alleles carried in cis the rarer D644V allele. None of the 95 control samples carried the C419F mutation, as determined by digestion of exon 7 PCR products with ApoI. Another sequence variant, IVS7+36-39delGATT, was observed to be in complete disequilibrium with all the USH2a patients who have the D644V allele. Unfortunately, we were unable to find USH2A mutations segregating with the 6 IVS7+36-39delGATT/D644V alleles in USH2a patients who did not have the C419F mutation. Concerning the IVS7+36-39delGATT allele among the control group with the D644V allele, BsrI digests of exon 7 PCR products showed that 4 of 16 D644V heterozygotes do not carry an IVS7+36-39delGATT allele, and the one normal control D644V homozygote was heterozygous for IVS7+36-39delGATT.

Discussion

Knowledge of the gene structure of USH2A was a prerequisite before a thorough screening of USHIIa patients for mutations in that gene could be undertaken. A full description of the genomic organization of the Usherin gene will facilitate the screening for additional pathologic mutations in patients and families that have USHIIa. The distribution of mutations across the gene might suggest certain alternatives for more-expedient clinical testing. To date, 17 mutations have been identified (fig. 3).

Combined 2299delG homozygotes and heterozygotes account for ∼20% of all USHIIa patients and may be the most frequent mutation causing RP in the human population. Thus, a reasonable first pass for USHIIa molecular diagnosis can be made by testing for the presence of the 2299delG mutation. The occurrence of apparent disequilibrium with rare polymorphisms (D644V, IVS7+36-39delgatt) suggests that other as-yet-undetected mutations may also be relatively common.

Usher syndrome is highly heterogeneous, with three different clinical types and at least 10 different genes. Usher type II has three subtypes: USHIIa on chromosome 1q is due to mutations in the Usherin gene, USHIIb on chromosome 3p (Hmani et al. 1999), USHIIc on chromosome 5q (Pieke-Dahl et al., in press), and a fourth group of Usher II families, affected members of which have a gene that remains to be localized (data not shown). The non-USHIIa families are in a minority, probably accounting for <30% of all cases of Usher II. This presents a problem for the positional cloning of the USH2B and USH2C genes. However, screening of Usher II patients for mutations in Usherin can help in differentiating those attributable to USH2A from those attributable to USH2B or USH2C, thus reducing the impact of heterogeneity on the search for those two genes. However, it is important to know how thoroughly USH2A mutations are detected. Our results indicate that ∼69% of all the true USH2A mutations have been detected by the methods used in this study.

The interfamilial variation of both the severity of hearing loss and the onset of RP in individuals with documented USHIIa may turn out to be due to particular mutations. Although no clear phenotypic variation can be assigned to the particular mutations presented here, a recent study of the prevalence of the 2299delG mutation included 10 atypical Usher cases and revealed a surprisingly high 40% carrier frequency, which indicates that environmental or genetic factors influence the effect of Usherin mutations (Liu et al. 1999).

The delineation of mutations involved in diseases provide an invaluable resource for identification of regions of the protein critical to its proper function. This strategy is especially useful with a novel protein such as Usherin, the function of which can only be speculated on at this stage of our knowledge. The discovery of three putative missense mutations (C319Y, N346H, and C419F) in the laminin type VI domain of this protein mark this region for a potentially significant functional role in the cochlea and retina. Of particular interest are the other classes of proteins containing domain VI motifs: laminin subunits α1, α2, α5, β1–β3, γ1, γ3, and netrins. Laminins (reviewed in Timpl 1996) are the major noncollagenous components of basement membranes that mediate cell adhesion, growth, migration, and differentiation. They function as heterotrimers composed of α, β, and γ subunits that combine to form 12 known heterotrimeric assembly forms, laminin-1 through -12 (Miner et al. 1997; Koch et al. 1999). Domain VI of the laminin subunits is crucial to a three-arm interaction model in which individual laminin heterotrimers polymerize via calcium ion–dependent domain VI interactions into quasihexagonal networks (Yurchenco and Cheng 1993). Netrins are small diffusable proteins that control guidance of central nervous system commissural axons at the midline and peripheral motor axons (reviewed in Tessier-Lavigne and Goodman 1996). A homolog of netrin in C. elegans, UNC-6, is one of the cues in the extracellular matrix that guides dorsoventral migrations of pioneer axons and migrating cells along the body wall on the epidermis (Ishii et al. 1992). It has been proposed that netrins may copolymerize within the laminin network in the basement membrane via its domain VI (Wadsworth et al. 1996).

Several mutations in the domain VI region of the genes encoding laminin subunits β3 (E210K), α2 (dy2J), and the C. elegans netrin UNC-6 (ev437 and ev436hs) have been shown (fig. 4). These mutations appear to permit at least some protein translation, with the encoded proteins producing less-severe phenotypes than null mutations. The mutation E210K, in the domain VI of laminin β3, is predictive of a less severe, nonlethal form of epidermolysis bullosa (MIM 226650; Mellerio et al. 1998), a genetically heterogeneous group of diseases characterized by easy blistering and fragility of the skin, where mutations in the genes encoding various components of the hemidesmosomal-anchoring filament complex and epidermal basement membrane have been identified (Pulkkinen and Uitto 1999). Similarly, mutations in laminin α2 and components of the dystrophin-associated glycoprotein complex cause various forms of muscular dystrophy (Culligan et al. 1998). The muscular dystrophy mouse dy2J produces a less severe phenotype because of a 57-aa deletion within the domain VI of laminin α2 (Sunada et al. 1995). The altered laminin-2 heterotrimer localizes to the basement membrane but is defective in laminin polymerization (Colognato et al. 1999). The UNC-6 mutations ev436hs and ev437 cause the selective loss of some, but not all, cell and axonal migrations directed by UNC-6 cues (Wadsworth et al. 1996).

The less severe phenotypes associated with these domain VI mutants appear to be in contrast to those of Usherin, in particular the C319Y homozygote. A review of clinical records indicates that this individual is phenotypically indistinguishable from several 2299delG homozygotes. In this regard, the domain VI UNC-6 mutation rh46 (A136P; fig. 4) produces a defective cell and axonal migration phenotype indistinguishable from the UNC-6 ev400 (Q78X) stop-codon mutant (Wadsworth et al. 1996).

Although netrin and laminin subunits share domain VI in common with Usherin, one difference is the motif's location in the protein. The domain VI in laminin subunits and netrin molecules is located at the NH2 terminal end of these proteins. In the case of Usherin, its domain VI is preceded by ∼300 aa of novel sequence (fig. 3). The potential functional role of Usherin in the development or maintenance of the sensory systems of the ear and eye based solely on domain structure similarities with laminins and netrins would be speculative. Recently, however, mutations in the human homolog of the Drosophila melanogaster protein crumbs (CRB1) have been identified in patients with a severe and specific form of autosomal recessive RP (RP12 [MIM 600105]) on chromosome 1q31-32.1. The CRB1 protein, which contains 19 EGF-like domains, three laminin A G-like domains, and a C-type lectin domain, is implicated in neuronal development of the retina; this fact is based on domain similarities with other EGF-like domain-containing proteins that are essential for neuronal development (den Hollander et al. 1999). It is quite likely that the mutated cysteine residues we have identified in patients with USHIIa disrupt intra- or intermolecular disulfide bonds. Whether these changes lead to an unstable protein more sensitive to proteolytic degradation or to an alteration in the structure and thus function of the protein is unknown. The identification of Usherin protein-binding partners, its subcellular localization, and its spatial and temporal pattern of expression will provide the evidence for a model of the function of this molecule in the cochlea and retina.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by NIH-NIDCD grant 5P01DC01813 (to W.J.K.), NIDCD grant R01DC02842 (to R.J.H.S.), and by The Foundation Fighting Blindness, Hunt Valley, MD (to W.J.K. and J.G.). In Holland, the study was supported by grants from the Dutch Foundation for the Handicapped Child, the Dutch Foundation “De Drie Lichten,” The Heinsius Houbolt Foundation, and De Landelijke Stichting voor Blinden en Slechtzienden. In South Africa, the study was supported in part by the Retinal Preservation Foundation of Southern Africa (to J.G.). We especially want to thank all the patients and their families for their participation in this study.

Electronic-Database Information

Accession numbers and URLs for data in this article are as follows:

  1. National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ (for GenBank accession nos.)
  2. Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM), http://www.ncbi.nim.nih.gov/omim (for Usher syndrome [MIM 276900], subtypes I, II [MIM 276901], and III [MIM 276902], epidermolysis bullosa [MIM 226650], and RP12 [MIM 600105]
  3. Pôle Bio-Informatique Lyonnais, http://ferrari.ibcp.fr/NPSA/npsa_multalin.html (for MULTIALIGN program)
  4. SignalP V1.1 World Wide Web Prediction Server, Center for Biological Sequence analysis (CBS), http://genome.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP/
  5. Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research/MIT Center for Genome Research, http://www.genome.wi.mit.edu

References

  1. Boughman JA, Vernon M, Shaver KA (1983) Usher syndrome: definition and estimate of prevalence from two high risk populations. J Chronic Dis 36:595–603 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chaib H, Kaplan J, Gerber S, Vincent C, Munnich A, Weissenbach J, Petit C (1997) A newly identified locus for Usher syndrome type I, USH1E, maps to chromosome 21q21. Hum Mol Genet 6:27–31 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Colognato H, Winkelmann DA, Yurchenco PD (1999) Laminin polymerization induces a receptor-cytoskeleton network. J Cell Biol 145:619–631 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Corpet F (1988) Multiple sequence alignment with hierarchical clustering. Nucleic Acids Res 16:10881–10890 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Culligan KG, Mackey AJ, Finn DM, Maguire PB, Ohlendieck K (1998) Role of dystrophin isoforms and associated proteins in muscular dystrophy. Int J Mol Med 2:639–648 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. den Hollander AI, ten Brink JB, de Kok YJ, van Soest S, van Den Born LI, van Driel MA, van De Pol DJ, et al (1999) Mutations in a human homologue of Drosophila crumbs cause retinitis pigmentosa (RP12). Nat Genet 23:217–221 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Eudy JD, Weston MD, Yao S, Hoover DM, Rehm HL, Ma-Edmonds M, Yan D, et al (1998) Mutation of a gene encoding a protein with extracellular matrix motifs in Usher syndrome type IIa. Science 280:1753–1757 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hmani M, Ghorbel A, Boulila-Elgaied A, Ben Zina Z, Kammoun W, Drira M, Chaabouni M, et al (1999) A novel locus for Usher syndrome type II, USH2B, maps to chromosome 3 at p23-24.2. Eur J Hum Genet 7:363–367 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ishii N, Wadsworth WG, Stern BD, Culotti JG, Hedgecock EM (1992) UNC-6, a laminin-related protein, guides cell and pioneer axon migrations in C. elegans. Neuron 9:873–881 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kaplan J, Gerber S, Bonneau D, Rozet JM, Delrieu O, Briard ML, Dollfus H, et al (1992) A gene for Usher syndrome type I (USH1A) maps to chromosome 14q. Genomics 14:979–987 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Keats BJ, Nouri N, Pelias MZ, Deininger PL, Litt M (1994) Tightly linked flanking microsatellite markers for the Usher syndrome type I locus on the short arm of chromosome 11. Am J Hum Genet 54:681–686 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kimberling W, Smith RJ (1992) Gene mapping of the Usher syndromes. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 25:923–934 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kimberling WJ, Weston MD, Moller C, Davenport SL, Shugart YY, Priluck IA, Martini A, et al (1990) Localization of Usher syndrome type II to chromosome 1q. Genomics 7:245–249 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Koch M, Olson PF, Albus A, Jin W, Hunter DD, Brunken WJ, Burgeson RE, et al (1999) Characterization and expression of the laminin γ3 chain: a novel, non-basement membrane-associated, laminin chain. J Cell Biol 145:605–618 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Liu XZ, Hope C, Liang CY, Zou JM, Xu LR, Cole T, Mueller RF, et al (1999) A mutation (2314delG) in the Usher syndrome type IIa gene: high prevalence and phenotypic variation. Am J Hum Genet 64:1221–1225 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mellerio JE, Eady RA, Atherton DJ, Lake BD, McGrath JA (1998) E210K mutation in the gene encoding the β3 chain of laminin-5 (LAMB3) is predictive of a phenotype of generalized atrophic benign epidermolysis bullosa. Br J Dermatol 139:325–331 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Miner JH, Patton BL, Lentz SI, Gilbert DJ, Snider WD, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG, et al (1997) The laminin α chains: expression, developmental transitions, and chromosomal locations of α1–5, identification of heterotrimeric laminins 8–11, and cloning of a novel α3 isoform. J Cell Biol 137:685–701 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mount SM (1982) A catalogue of splice junction sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 10:459–472 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Nielsen H, Engelbrecht J, Brunak S, von Heijne G (1997) Identification of prokaryotic and eukaryotic signal peptides and prediction of their cleavage sites. Protein Eng 10:1–6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Pieke-Dahl SA, Moller CG, Kelley PM, Astuto LM, Cremers CWRJ, Gorin MB, Kimberling WJ. Genetic heterogeneity of Usher syndrome type II: localization to chromosome 5q. Am J Med Genet (in press) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Pieke-Dahl SA, Weston MD, Kimberling WJ (1997) Genetic heterogeneity of the Usher syndromes. Assoc Res Otolaryngol 20:A874 [Google Scholar]
  22. Pulkkinen L, Uitto J (1999) Mutation analysis and molecular genetics of epidermolysis bullosa. Matrix Biol 18:29–42 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sankila EM, Pakarinen L, Kaariainen H, Aittomaki K, Karjalainen S, Sistonen P, de la Chapelle A (1995) Assignment of an Usher syndrome type III (USH3) gene to chromosome 3q. Hum Mol Genet 4:93–98 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Smith RJ, Berlin CI, Hejtmancik JF, Keats BJ, Kimberling WJ, Lewis RA, Moller CG, et al (1994) Clinical diagnosis of the Usher syndromes. Usher Syndrome Consortium. Am J Med Genet 50:32–38 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Smith RJ, Steel KP, Barkway C, Soucek S, Michaels L (1992) A histologic study of nonmorphogenetic forms of hereditary hearing impairment. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 118:1085–1094 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sunada Y, Bernier SM, Utani A, Yamada Y, Campbell KP (1995) Identification of a novel mutant transcript of laminin α 2 chain gene responsible for muscular dystrophy and dysmyelination in dy2J mice. Hum Mol Genet 4:1055–1061 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Tessier-Lavigne M, Goodman CS (1996) The molecular biology of axon guidance. Science 274:1123–1133 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Timpl R (1996) Macromolecular organization of basement membranes. Curr Opin Cell Biol 8:618–624 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Wadsworth WG, Bhatt H, Hedgecock EM (1996) Neuroglia and pioneer neurons express UNC-6 to provide global and local netrin cues for guiding migrations in C. elegans. Neuron 16:35–46 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wayne S, Der Kaloustian V, Schloss M, Polomeno R, Scott DA, Hejtmancik JF, Sheffield VC, et al (1996) Localization of the Usher syndrome type ID gene (Ush1D) to chromosome 10. Hum Mol Genet 5:1689–1692 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wayne S, Lowry RB, McLeod DR, Knaus R, Farr C, Smith RJH (1997) Localization of the Usher syndrome type IF to chromosome 10. Am J Hum Genet 61:A300 [Google Scholar]
  32. Yurchenco PD, Cheng YS (1993) Self-assembly and calcium-binding sites in laminin: a three-arm interaction model. J Biol Chem 268:17286–17299 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Human Genetics are provided here courtesy of American Society of Human Genetics

RESOURCES