Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1995 Apr;68(4 Suppl):142S–149S.

The conformation of the active site of myosin probed using mant-nucleotides.

K Franks-Skiba 1, R Cooke 1
PMCID: PMC1281897  PMID: 7787057

Abstract

Changes in the conformation of the active site of myosin subfragment-1 (S1) may be linked to the production of force during the powerstroke. We probed the conformation of the nucleotide pocket by measuring the solvent accessibility of bound mant-nucleotides. Solvent accessibility was determined by measuring the quenching of fluorescence produced by the solvent phase quencher acrylamide. The fluorescent mant moiety is attached to the ribose and is located near the outside of the pocket where it is likely to be sensitive to opening of the pocket. MantADP was highly protected from the quencher when bound to the active site of S1. A similar degree of protection was also observed for mantATP during steady-state hydrolysis by S1, and for mantADP bound to acto-S1 or to myosin in myofibrils. Assuming that S1-mantATP and actoS1-mantADP represent states at the beginning and the end of the powerstroke, respectively, we conclude that the myosin nucleotide pocket does not undergo a large conformational change during the powerstroke. However, the high degree of protection seen for mant-nucleotides is not easily explained by the open structure of the nucleotide pocket in the S1-nucleotide complex observed by x-ray diffraction.

Full text

PDF
142s

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ando T., Duke J. A. The process in which nucleotide is buried into the active site of heavy meromyosin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1983 Aug 30;115(1):312–316. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(83)91005-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ando T., Duke J. A., Tonomura Y., Morales M. F. Spectroscopic isolation of ES complexes of myosin subfragment-1 ATPase by fluorescence quenching. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1982 Nov 16;109(1):1–6. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(82)91557-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bradford M. M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248–254. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cooke R., Franks K. All myosin heads form bonds with actin in rigor rabbit skeletal muscle. Biochemistry. 1980 May 13;19(10):2265–2269. doi: 10.1021/bi00551a042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cooke R. The mechanism of muscle contraction. CRC Crit Rev Biochem. 1986;21(1):53–118. doi: 10.3109/10409238609113609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cremo C. R., Neuron J. M., Yount R. G. Interaction of myosin subfragment 1 with fluorescent ribose-modified nucleotides. A comparison of vanadate trapping and SH1-SH2 cross-linking. Biochemistry. 1990 Apr 3;29(13):3309–3319. doi: 10.1021/bi00465a023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Eccleston J. F., Moore K. J., Brownbridge G. G., Webb M. R., Lowe P. N. Fluorescence approaches to the study of the p21ras GTPase mechanism. Biochem Soc Trans. 1991 Apr;19(2):432–437. doi: 10.1042/bst0190432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Eftink M. R., Ghiron C. A. Exposure of tryptophanyl residues in proteins. Quantitative determination by fluorescence quenching studies. Biochemistry. 1976 Feb 10;15(3):672–680. doi: 10.1021/bi00648a035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Etlinger J. D., Zak R., Fischman D. A. Compositional studies of myofibrils from rabbit striated muscle. J Cell Biol. 1976 Jan;68(1):123–141. doi: 10.1083/jcb.68.1.123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fisher A. J., Smith C. A., Thoden J., Smith R., Sutoh K., Holden H. M., Rayment I. Structural studies of myosin:nucleotide complexes: a revised model for the molecular basis of muscle contraction. Biophys J. 1995 Apr;68(4 Suppl):19S–28S. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Franks-Skiba K., Hwang T., Cooke R. Quenching of fluorescent nucleotides bound to myosin: a probe of the active-site conformation. Biochemistry. 1994 Oct 25;33(42):12720–12728. doi: 10.1021/bi00208a025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Geeves M. A. The dynamics of actin and myosin association and the crossbridge model of muscle contraction. Biochem J. 1991 Feb 15;274(Pt 1):1–14. doi: 10.1042/bj2740001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hiratsuka T. New ribose-modified fluorescent analogs of adenine and guanine nucleotides available as substrates for various enzymes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1983 Feb 15;742(3):496–508. doi: 10.1016/0167-4838(83)90267-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Johnson D. A., Yguerabide J. Solute accessibility to N epsilon-fluorescein isothiocyanate-lysine-23 cobra alpha-toxin bound to the acetylcholine receptor. A consideration of the effect of rotational diffusion and orientation constraints on fluorescence quenching. Biophys J. 1985 Dec;48(6):949–955. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(85)83858-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Joseph D., Petsko G. A., Karplus M. Anatomy of a conformational change: hinged "lid" motion of the triosephosphate isomerase loop. Science. 1990 Sep 21;249(4975):1425–1428. doi: 10.1126/science.2402636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kabsch W., Mannherz H. G., Suck D., Pai E. F., Holmes K. C. Atomic structure of the actin:DNase I complex. Nature. 1990 Sep 6;347(6288):37–44. doi: 10.1038/347037a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rayment I., Holden H. M., Whittaker M., Yohn C. B., Lorenz M., Holmes K. C., Milligan R. A. Structure of the actin-myosin complex and its implications for muscle contraction. Science. 1993 Jul 2;261(5117):58–65. doi: 10.1126/science.8316858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rayment I., Rypniewski W. R., Schmidt-Bäse K., Smith R., Tomchick D. R., Benning M. M., Winkelmann D. A., Wesenberg G., Holden H. M. Three-dimensional structure of myosin subfragment-1: a molecular motor. Science. 1993 Jul 2;261(5117):50–58. doi: 10.1126/science.8316857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Root D. D., Reisler E. The accessibility of etheno-nucleotides to collisional quenchers and the nucleotide cleft in G- and F-actin. Protein Sci. 1992 Aug;1(8):1014–1022. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560010807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rosenfeld S. S., Taylor E. W. Reactions of 1-N6-ethenoadenosine nucleotides with myosin subfragment 1 and acto-subfragment 1 of skeletal and smooth muscle. J Biol Chem. 1984 Oct 10;259(19):11920–11929. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Spudich J. A., Watt S. The regulation of rabbit skeletal muscle contraction. I. Biochemical studies of the interaction of the tropomyosin-troponin complex with actin and the proteolytic fragments of myosin. J Biol Chem. 1971 Aug 10;246(15):4866–4871. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Tonomura Y., Appel P., Morales M. On the molecular weight of myosin. II. Biochemistry. 1966 Feb;5(2):515–521. doi: 10.1021/bi00866a017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Weeds A. G., Taylor R. S. Separation of subfragment-1 isoenzymes from rabbit skeletal muscle myosin. Nature. 1975 Sep 4;257(5521):54–56. doi: 10.1038/257054a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES