Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Aug 9.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Imaging. 2025 Aug 9;123:110489. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2025.110489

Table 1.

Between-limb comparisons for all variables of interest. Values are reported as mean (standard deviation).

ACL-D CONTR Effect Sizea p-value

Strength
   ISOM (Nm) 157.6 (63.8) 210.8 (65.9) −1.14 [−1.52, −0.76] <.001
Diffusion Parameters
   FA 0.33 (0.03) 0.30 (0.03) 0.93 [0.75, 1.28] <.001
   MD (x10−3 m2/s) 1.24 (0.05) 1.26 (0.04) −0.62 [−0.94, −0.30] <.001
   RD (x10−3 m2/s) 0.99 (0.05) 1.03 (0.05) −0.81 [−1.15, −0.50] <.001
Fiber Geometry
Pooled CSA (μm2) 4143.5 (937.3) 4811.6 (980.3) −0.79 [−1.12, −0.44] <.001
Pooled MFD (μm) 58.1 (7.1) 61.6 (7.1) −0.65 [−0.97, −0.32] <.001

ISOM = Isometric Peak Torque; FA = Fractional Anisotropy; MD = Mean Diffusivity; RD = Radial Diffusivity; CSA = cross-sectional area; MFD = minimum feret diameter

a

Cohen’s d, 95% confidence interval shown in brackets

Bolded p-values indicate statistical significance