Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Nov 22.
Published in final edited form as: J Addict Dis. 2021 May 25;40(1):62–70. doi: 10.1080/10550887.2021.1926889

The Effect of Prescribing Antibiotics with Opioids on the Development of Opioid Use Disorder: A National Database Study

Zachary G Freedman 1, Jennifer A Kane 1, Tonya S King 2, Nicholas M Graziane 3,*
PMCID: PMC12636087  NIHMSID: NIHMS2117398  PMID: 34030608

Abstract

Objective:

The goal of this study was to examine the impact of inpatient or emergency department prescribed antibiotic treatment in combination with opioids on the risk of developing opioid use disorder 12 months following discharge from the hospital.

Methods:

The authors conducted a propensity score-matched cohort study with data from the TriNetX Research Network database to identify adult subjects (18-65 years old) with no previous history of an opioid use disorder. Three cohorts were defined for the analyses: subjects who were prescribed an opioid, opioid in combination with an antibiotic, or an antibiotic while in the emergency department or inpatient unit, from the years 2012 to 2018. The diagnosis of an Opioid Related Disorder (F11.10-F11.20) 12 months following discharge from the emergency department or inpatient unit was then observed within the cohorts following the index event as identified by the ICD-10 procedural coding system.

Results:

Primary analysis (propensity-score matched on age and sex) showed that opioids prescribed in combination with antibiotics had a protective effect against the development of opioid use disorder. This effect was consistent throughout all of the years included in this study with the smallest protective effect observed in 2018 (2012 risk ratio=1.27 (95% CI: 1.23, 1.32); 2018 risk ratio: 1.03 (95% CI: 1.01, 1.05).

Conclusions:

These findings suggest that opioids prescribed in combination with antibiotics in the hospital setting are protective against the development of OUD at later time points following hospital discharge.

Keywords: Opioid use disorder, opioid, antibiotic, prescription, microbiome, emergency department, inpatient unit, TriNetX

Introduction

Evidence suggests that the majority of patients who have an opioid use disorder (OUD) reported that their first opioid was a prescription drug1. With the opioid epidemic steadily on the rise in the United States since 2000, in part due to the advent of synthetic opioid products2, it is important to increase research efforts that identify risk factors that are correlated with the development of OUD as well as protective factors capable of reducing the development of OUD in vulnerable individuals.

The addictive properties of prescription opioids are often attributed to the agonistic effects on μ-opioid receptors in the central nervous system and their ability to cross the blood-brain barrier via active transport, which allows for rapid increases in brain concentration and fast onset of action3. However, growing clinical and preclinical evidence implicates the gut microbiome in the persistent misuse of illicit substances, including opioids4, 5. These studies highlight that exposure to opioids elicits gut dysbiosis (a microbial imbalance or maladaptation), as well as alterations in the production and expression of microbial metabolites. Given that the gut microbiome is causally associated with anxiety-like behaviors 6 and directly modulates drug-withdrawal-induced anxiety7, these opioid-induced alterations in the gut microbiome may contribute to critical physiological responses observed in OUD that perpetuate continued drug use, including negative affective states8.

In addition to opioids, there is evidence that antibiotics modify the gut microbiome, eliciting either a negative (pathogenic) or positive impact (i.e., eubiotic effect)9. This modification is dependent upon the class (bacterial targets), pharmacokinetic profile, pharmacodynamics, dose, duration, and route of administration9. Preclinical studies of substance use disorders, employing the conditioned place preference paradigm, a model of drug reward and drug-context associations, have shown that antibiotic treatment blocks cocaine (10 mg/kg)-induced conditioned place preference10, 11. Additionally, preclinical research has shown that the β-lactam antibiotic, ceftriaxone, is effective at attenuating drug-seeking behaviors12, 13. Based on the observed protective effects of antibiotics on addiction like behaviors in preclinical models of substance use disorders, we sought to investigate whether antibiotic co-treatment with opioids in a hospital or emergency department setting influenced the risk of developing OUD 12 months following discharge from the hospital. For this investigation, we employed TriNetX electronic medical records. TriNetX is a third-party software product that provides access to a clinical data network consisting of 170 healthcare organizations across 30 countries14. Here, we employed TriNetX to test the hypothesis that antibiotics prescribed with opioids in the hospital setting were associated with a protective effect against developing OUD following discharge from the hospital.

Methods

Data source

This retrospective observational study employed TriNetX electronic medical record data from the Diamond Network consisting of 92 health care organizations representing hospitals within the United States. These data included de-identified information on subject demographics, diagnoses, procedures, and prescription files. This research did not involve human subjects because the data were not obtained through intervention or interaction with living individuals and identifiable private information was not obtained (HHS regulations, 45 CFR 46. 102(d)). Therefore, this study was exempt from review by the Institutional Review Board at Penn State College of Medicine. Penn State College of Medicine has an agreement in place to access the TriNetX Research Network.

Study population and operational definitions

Subjects from the United States, between the ages of 18 and 65 that had an index event which included the prescription of an antimicrobial (AM000), an opioid analgesic (CN101), or both an antimicrobial and opioid analgesic were included in this study. In TriNetX, 13 antibiotic classes fell under the prescription code for antimicrobials. We excluded antiviral and antifungal codes. The remaining 11 classes of antimicrobials that were included in the study can be found in Appendix A. There were 21 narcotic drugs that fell under the opioid analgesic code, a list of these can be found in Appendix A. Specific medication classes were not isolated for analysis in this study. Along with being prescribed an antimicrobial, opioid, or both, subjects also required a hospital inpatient service (1013659), or emergency department service (1013711) during the prescription index event as identified by Current Procedural Terminology codes. By using the emergency department and in patient care units as inclusion criteria, we could ensure, with the highest probability, that the opioids and/or antibiotics were administered to the subjects in the hospital, whereas in an outpatient setting, there is greater likelihood for poor medication compliance. Subjects were excluded from the cohorts if they were prescribed an antifungal (AM700), antiviral (AM800), or antiparasitic (AP000). In addition to the prescriptions listed above, as identified by the National Drug File Reference Terminology System, subjects were excluded from the antibiotic cohort if they were prescribed an opioid and excluded from the opioid cohort if they were prescribed an antibiotic.

Statistical Analyses

Using the TriNetX software, which utilizes a combination of JAVA, R and Python programming languages, eligible subjects were placed into cohorts based on their index event between the years of 2012 to 2018. This range in years was selected because, during this timeframe, 1) electronic medical records were widely used, 2) the specific diagnosis for OUD versus a more general substance use disorder diagnosis was likely to be identified and recorded, and 3) opioid-related deaths were continuing to rise in the United States, especially in the second and third waves of the opioid epidemic that began in 2010 and 2013 respectively2, 15. To improve compatibility between cohorts, a propensity score-based matching on age and sex was used based on a TriNetX built-in algorithm, which implements a 1:1 nearest-neighbor matching with a caliper of 0.1 standard deviations. Therefore, subjects listed as unknown sex in the electronic medical record were not included in the cohorts. Cohorts were matched on age and sex as it has been shown both in preclinical and clinical research that these variables impact addiction-like behaviors and substance use disorders, respectively16-18. Additionally, we could not reliably implement a propensity-score matching based on race and/or ethnicity due to the large number of subjects in the unknown race and ethnicity category (Table I). Using propensity-score matching, we compared cohorts in the years spanning 2012 through 2018, 12 months following discharge from the hospital. 12 months was selected based on the antibiotic-induced changes in bacterial flora that, as shown in humans, can persist for 6 months and up to 2 years after treatment, with a similar effect observed in rodents19, 20. The diagnosis of an Opioid Related Disorder (F11.10-F11.20) within 12 months of the index event was then observed within the cohorts as identified by the ICD-10 procedural coding system. Estimates of the risk of OUD were generated for each group, as well as the risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the comparison between groups.

Table I.

Characteristics of patients included in this study.

Year Cohort Predisposing Factors
Age
Category
Sex Race Ethnicity
Mean Age
(SD)
Male Female African/
American
Unknown White Hispanic
and
Latino
Non-Hispanic
and Latino
Unknown
2012 Opioid
(cohort: n=368,690)
46.1±11.9 164,257
(45.5%)
204,340
(55.4%)
18,434
(5%)
276,517
(75%)
73,738
(20%)
7,374
(2%)
272,831
(74%)
88,486
(24%)
Antibiotic
(cohort: n=492,319)
38.7± 13.9 185,177
(37.6%)
307,039
(62.4%)
196,923
(4%)
394,009
(78%)
88,617
(18%)
9,846
(2%)
108,310
(22%)
374,162
(76%)
Opioid + Antibiotic
(cohort: n=472,934)
45.1±12.3 171,354
(36.2%)
301,472
(63.7%)
18,917
(4%)
345,242
(73%)
108,775
(23%)
9,459
(2%)
340,512
(72%)
122,963
(26%)
2013 Opioid
(cohort: n=852,721)
38.2±12.2 371,896
(43.6%)
480,612
(56.4%)
42,636
(5%)
639,541
(75%)
170,544
(20%)
17,054
(2%)
631,013
(74%)
204,653
(24%)
Antibiotic
(cohort: n=1,138,172)
37.3± 12.7 424832
(37.3%)
713,077
(62.7%)
45,527
(4%)
910,538
(80%)
182,108
(16%)
22,763
(2%)
887,774
(78%)
227,634
(20%)
Opioid + Antibiotic
(cohort: n=1,048,523)
37.3±12.7 378,832
(36.2%)
668,464
(63.8%)
41,941
(4%)
786,392
(75%)
220,190
(21%)
20,970
(2%)
775,907
(74%)
251,646
(24%)
2014 Opioid
(cohort: n=1,006,553)
39.4±12.3 451,793
(44.9%)
554,546
(55.1%)
50,328
(5%)
754,915
(75%)
201,311
(20%)
20,131
(2%)
734,784
(73%)
251,638
(25%)
Antibiotic
(cohort: n=1,421,701)
32.2±14.2 530,542
(37.3%)
890,740
(62.7%)
56,868
(4%)
1,108,927
(78%)
255,906
(18%)
42,651
(3%)
1,066,276
(75%)
312,774
(22%)
Opioid + Antibiotic
(cohort: n=1,320,000)
38.5±12.7 494,751
(37.5%)
824,902
(62.5%)
66,000
(5%)
963,600
(73%)
290,400
(22%)
26,400
(2%)
356,400
(27%)
937,200
(71%)
2015 Opioid
(cohort: n=1,233,402)
39.8±12.5 542,010
(44.0%)
691,077
(56.0%)
61,670
(5%)
937,386
(76%)
234,346
(19%)
24,668
(2%)
912,717
(74%)
296,016
(24%)
Antibiotic
(cohort: n=1,611,784)
33.3±14.2 606,303
(37.6%)
1,004,962
(62.4%)
64,472
(4%)
1,257,192
(78%)
290,121
(18%)
48,354
(3%)
1,208,838
(75%)
354,592
(22%)
Opioid + Antibiotic
(cohort: n=1.575,463)
39.2±12.8 599,503
(38.1%)
975,571
(61.9%)
78,773
(5%)
1,150,088
(73%)
346,602
(22%)
31,509
(2%)
425,375
(27%)
1,118,579
(71%)
2016 Opioid
(cohort: n=1,241,243)
40.6±12.7 539,281
(43.5%)
701,683
(56.5%)
62,062
(5%)
943,345
(76%)
235,836
(19%)
24,825
(2%)
297,898
(24%)
918,520
(74%)
Antibiotic
(cohort: n=1,649,083)
34.4±14.2 620,319
(37.6%)
1,028,252
(62.4%)
65,963
(4%)
1,286,285
(78%)
296,835
(18%)
49,472
(3%)
1,236,790
(75%)
362,798
(22%)
Opioid + Antibiotic
(cohort: n=1,586,974)
40±13 605,140
(38.1%)
981,454
(61.8%)
79,349
(5%)
1,158,491
(73%)
349,134
(22%)
31,739
(2%)
428,483
(27%)
1,126,752
(71%)
2017 Opioid
(cohort: n=1,083,409)
41.6±12.8 471,306
(43.5%)
611,909
(56.5%)
54,170
(5%)
834,225
(77%)
195,014
(18%)
21,668
(2%)
249,184
(23%)
812,557
(75%)
Antibiotic
(cohort: n=1,633,660)
35.5±14.3 618,020
(37.8%)
1,015,213
(62.1%)
65,346
(4%)
1,290,591
(79%)
277,722
(17%)
343,069
(21%)
1,241,582
(76%)
49,010
(3%)
Opioid + Antibiotic
(cohort: n=1,397,865)
41.2±13.1 539,854
(38.6%)
857,730
(61.4%)
69,893
(5%)
1,020,441
(73%)
307,530
(22%)
27,957
(2%)
363,445
(26%)
1,006,463
(72%)
2018 Opioid
(cohort: n=975,392)
42.7±12.8 601,081
(43.0%)
796,783
(57.0%)
48,770
(5%)
751,052
(77%)
175,571
(18%)
29,262
(3%)
214,586
(22%)
731,544
(75%)
Antibiotic
(cohort: n=1,638,724)
37.0±14.3 463,899
(38.8%)
730,724
(61.6%)
65,548
(4%)
1,294,592
(79%)
278,583
(17%)
49,162
(3%)
327,745
(20%)
1,261,817
(77%)
Opioid + Antibiotic
(cohort: n=1,194,880)
42.4±13.2 463,899
(38.8%)
730,724
(61.2%)
59,744
(5%)
884,211
(74%)
250,925
(21%)
23,898
(2%)
298,720
(25%)
872,262
(73%)

Results

Risk of developing OUD after receiving an opioid prescription in the hospital 12-months following discharge.

Within emergency departments and inpatient units, we identified subjects that were prescribed opioids, opioids in combination with antibiotics (opioids + antibiotics), or antibiotics. Demographics of subject cohorts from years 2012 to 2018 are listed in Table I, including the mean age, sex, race and ethnicity. Cohorts, on average, were composed of approximately 60% females to approximately 40% males within each year. The cohorts predominantly consisted of subjects with unknown race (~70%).

Using a propensity score-based on matching age and sex, we calculated the risk of developing OUD 12-months following discharge from the hospital from the years 2012 to 2018 within each cohort. For each cohort, the risk of developing OUD 12-months following discharge from the hospital prior to propensity-score matching is shown in Table II (rates varied slightly based on the individual pair-wise comparisons due to the propensity score adjustment).

Table II.

Risk of developing OUD twelve-months following hospital discharge when the subject was prescribed an opioid or opioid+different types of antibiotics. Risk values represent unmatched data.

Year Opioid Opioid+
antibiotic
Antibiotic
2012 2.106% 1.599% 0.492%
2013 2.473% 1.853% 0.573%
2014 2.746% 2.164% 0.684%
2015 3.228% 2.826% 0.903%
2016 2.892% 2.637% 0.878%
2017 2.650% 2.397% 0.892%
2018 2.410% 2.267% 0.899%

The comparison of risk between cohorts showed that subjects prescribed opioids alone had an increased risk of developing OUD 12 months (Table III) following discharge from the hospital when compared to subjects prescribed opioids in combination with antibiotics. This effect was consistent throughout each year spanning from 2012 to 2018. We also found that from 2012 to 2018, the risk ratio of developing OUD in subjects prescribed opioids vs. opioids + antibiotics steadily declined (Table III). However, this steady decline was not due to decreases in the risk of developing OUD in subjects prescribed opioids, but rather due to an increase in the risk of developing OUD in subjects prescribed opioids + antibiotics (Table III). Lastly, as expected, our results from the antibiotic cohort showed a strong decrease in the risk of developing OUD compared to cohorts that were prescribed opioids.

Table III.

Risk and risk ratios (RR) of developing OUD twelve-months following hospital discharge.

Year Opioid Opioid+
antibiotic
RR [95%
CI]
Opioid +
Antibiotic
Antibiotic RR [95%
CI]
Opioid Antibiotic RR [95%
CI]
2012 2.101%
(n=365,055)
1.645%
(n=365,346)
1.27 [1.23, 1.32] 1.590%
(n=378,125)
0.593%
(n=379,097)
2.68 [2.56, 2.81] 2.101%
(n=326,234)
0.610%
(n=327,316)
3.45 [3.28, 3.62]
2013 2.464%
(n=821,370)
1.912%
(n=826,701)
1.29 [1.26, 1.32] 1.851%
(n=843,763)
0.689%
(n=853,112)
2.69 [2.61, 2.77] 2.479%
(n=736,578)
0.707%
(n=750,186)
3.51 [3.40, 3.61]
2014 2.746%
(n=962,820)
2.233%
(n=971,601)
1.23 [1.21, 1.25] 2.154%
(n=1,066,605)
0.801%
(n=1,086,612)
2.69 [2.62, 2.76] 2.745%
(n=904,372)
0.815%
(n=930,637)
3.37 [3.28, 3.45]
2015 3.228%
(n=1,162,409)
2.910%
(n=1,169,910)
1.11 [1.09, 1.13] 2.799%
(n=1,224,900)
1.033%
(n=1,258,063)
2.71 [2.66, 2.76] 3.217%
(n=1,070,395)
1.049%
(n=1,108,036)
3.07 [3.00, 3.13]
2016 2.892%
(n=1,144,690)
2.710%
(n=1,150,423)
1.07 [1.05, 1.08] 2.611%
(n=1,233,860)
0.983%
(n=1,280,835)
2.66 [2.60, 2.71] 2.882%
(n=1,080,778)
1.002%
(n=1,129,551)
2.88 [2.81, 2.94]
2017 2.650%
(n=978,484)
2.465%
(n=985,652)
1.08 [1.06, 1.09] 2.392%
(n=1,151,151)
0.984%
(n=1,205,447)
2.43 [2.38, 2.48] 2.651%
(n=977,994)
0.999%
(n=1,033,357)
2.65 [2.59, 2.71]
2018 2.410%
(n=866,040)
2.334%
(n=871,173)
1.03 [1.01, 1.05] 2.266%
(n=1,051,785)
0.961%
(n=1,111,765)
2.36 [2.31, 2.41] 2.410%
(n=866,040)
0.986%
(n=922,287)
2.44 [2.38, 2.50]

Risk values represent data from propensity-score matching. CI=confidence interval.

Discussion

Using the TriNetX electronic medical record database, we found that the relative risk of developing OUD was reduced in subjects who were prescribed opioids in combination with antibiotics when compared to subjects that were prescribed opioids in the absence of antibiotic treatment. Additionally, comparing these two cohorts, we found that the risk ratio for developing OUD steadily decreased each year with the lowest risk ratio calculated during the year of 2018. Lastly, in subjects prescribed an opioid in the hospital setting, our results showed that the risk of being diagnosed with OUD twelve months following discharge from the hospital was, overall, less than 3%.

The finding that antibiotics in combination with opioids reduce the risk of developing OUD coincides with preclinical evidence that shows that antibiotics are protective against the expression of addiction-like behaviors. A well-studied antibiotic, ceftriaxone, has proven effective at blocking drug-seeking behaviors in rodent models of psychostimulant, alcohol, and opioid use disorders21, 22. Evidence suggests that the mechanism mediating ceftriaxone’s effects on drug seeking is mediated by its ability to increase the expression of the glutamate transporter, GLT-1, on glia, which in turn enables efficient removal of glutamate from the synapse within key brain regions involved in reward and motivation23. However, ceftriaxone is also capable of altering the gut microbiota24 and it may be through its effects on the gut microbiota that allows ceftriaxone to regulate drug-seeking behaviors in rodent models of substance use disorders. Additionally, antibiotics may have an indirect effect on OUD through their effects on microbiome depletion20. In patients diagnosed with OUD compared to healthy controls, there is evidence that there are differences in alpha (the diversity within a particular area) and beta diversity (the diversity between species) within the gut microbiome25-27. These changes, as shown in rodent models, may compromise intestinal barrier function28, 29, resulting in the opening of tight junctions in the large intestine. This would enable bacteria and their toxins to penetrate the bloodstream and lead to systemic inflammation. Given that systemic inflammation is observed in OUD patients as well as in preclinical models of OUD30-32, antibiotic-induced depletion of the gut microbiota may remove pathogenic taxa that inhabit the gut following repeated exposure to opioids. Despite this aforementioned evidence that antibiotic co-treatment with opioids protects against OUD, it is also possible that antibiotic treatment may interfere with a healthy microbiota enabling pathogenic taxa to colonize and contribute to the development of OUD. The results obtained from this investigation suggest that antibiotics are more protective than facilitative when it comes to the development of OUD. However, our study is limited by our inability to identify how many opioid prescriptions the subjects received after the index event was measured. Additionally, the comparisons between cohorts may include different subject populations based on the requirement of an antibiotic prescription33.

Interestingly, we found that the risk ratio between the subjects prescribed opioids versus opioids + antibiotics decreased from 2012 to 2018. This was due to increases in the risk of developing OUD from 2012 to 2018 in subjects prescribed opioids in combination with antibiotics (~30%), whereas the risk in the opioid cohort increased relatively less (~12%) twelve months following discharge from the hospital (Table II). The observed increased risk in the opioid + antibiotic cohort is potentially due to the increased risk evoked by the antibiotic as the risk for the antibiotic cohort increased the most relative to the other groups (~45%) during this same time frame. Although it is unknown why the risk of developing OUD within the antibiotic and opioid + antibiotic cohorts increased relatively greater from 2012 to 2018 compared to the opioid cohort, potential contributing factors may be the type of antibiotic prescribed as well as the route of antibiotic administration as it has been shown that these factors dictate the pathogenic or eubiotic effects of antibiotics9.

Finally, we acknowledge that data gathered in this study which was used to make statistical comparisons comes with limitations. For example, we are limited by the OUD diagnoses, which may not always be accurately diagnosed and/or may be incomplete. This includes geographical discrepancies in OUD diagnosis as well as discrepancies introduced over the time course of this study. For example, physicians/providers may not have been as well trained to identify an opioid-related disorder during the first half of this study timeframe as compared to more recent years. Additionally, we are unable to differentiate opioid or antibiotic treatment based on dose, duration of use, or route of administration. Moreover, if the results found within this data set are dependent upon the microbiome, our analyses did not take into account confounding factors that influence the gut microbiota, including geographic regions, socioeconomic status, pre/probiotic use, exercise, comorbidities, weight, and drug use prior to treatment. Along these same lines, the inability to identify race using the TriNetX software reduces our ability to investigate how microbiomes and race, which constitutes social, environment, and biological factors, are intertwined. As the TriNetX software evolves, the inclusion of race-related data will be essential. We also acknowledge that the TriNetX platform does not represent the general U.S. population, but rather people who received clinical care within the network. Lastly, it is possible that some subjects were included in two or more cohorts (e.g., antibiotic cohort of 2012 and opioid + antibiotic cohort of 2016) in this study. While we are not sure of the quantity of antibiotic and opioid prescriptions before or after the index event of subjects in each cohort, our results represent a snapshot in time that is still representative of relative risk for development of OUD. Despite these limitations, TriNetX does provide large sample sizes from 92 health systems throughout the United States and rigorous analysis based on propensity-score matching. Because of this, we were able to efficiently and cost-effectively identify a large population of subjects within each cohort to address our question, and in this case, support our hypothesis. Although we are unsure what a risk ratio of 1.03 between the opioid vs. opioid+antibiotic cohort (year 2018) means in terms of clinical relevance, it is clear, based on the large sample size gathered from this study, that a 3% change may impact thousands of lives.

Conclusion

Our overall findings, using a broad-based investigative approach, suggest that opioids prescribed in combination with antibiotics in the hospital setting are protective against the development of OUD at later time points following hospital discharge. Importantly, our findings are not meant to suggest that antibiotics should be prescribed along with opioids to reduce the risk of OUD as other potential life threatening complications may arise, including antibiotic resistance. Currently, in the dental setting, there are prevention strategies being implemented to reduce antibiotic and opioid over-prescription to minimize antibiotic resistance, adverse drug events, and illicit opioid use33, 34. Therefore, the intention of this study is facilitate more carefully crafted inquiries that can be pursued to further understand the relationship between antibiotic treatment, the gut microbiome, and the risk of developing OUD, including clinical trials to further explore this area. Continued work on this topic has the potential to lead to scientifically-based treatment options for individuals vulnerable to developing OUD.

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Diane McCloskey for edits and comments. Access and support for the use of TriNetX was provided through a National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences Clinical and Translational Science Award.

Appendix A

Antimicrobials

AM114: Penicillins and beta-lactam antimicrobials
AM900: Anti-infectives
AM200: Eythromycins/macrolides
AM400: Quinolones
AM650: Sulfonamide/related antimicrobials
AM350: Lincomycins
AM250: Tetracyclines
AM600: Nitrofuran antimicrobials
AM300: Aminoglycosides
AM550: Methamine salts antimicrobials
AM500: Antituberculars

Opioid analgesics

Tramadol Levorphanol
Buprenorphine Meperidine
Butorphanol Methadone
Butalbital Morphine
Benzhydrocodone Nalbuphine
Dihydrocodeine Remifentanil
Codeine Oxycodone
Hydromorphone Oxymorphine
Fentanyl Tapentadol
Alfentanil Pentazocine
Hydrocodone
Sufentanil

Footnotes

Declaration of Interest

The authors have no financial or non-financial competing interests to declare.

REFERENCES CITED

  • 1.Grau LE, Dasgupta N, Harvey AP, Irwin K, Givens A, Kinzly ML, Heimer R. Illicit use of opioids: is OxyContin a "gateway drug"? Am J Addict 2007; 16:166–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.O'Donnell JK, Gladden RM, Seth P. Trends in Deaths Involving Heroin and Synthetic Opioids Excluding Methadone, and Law Enforcement Drug Product Reports, by Census Region — United States, 2006–2015. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, Vol. 66. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Minhas M, Leri F. A Multifaceted Analysis of Oxycodone Addiction. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction 2018; 16:1016–1032. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ren M, Lotfipour S. The role of the gut microbiome in opioid use. Behav Pharmacol 2020; 31:113–121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Meckel KR, Kiraly DD. A potential role for the gut microbiome in substance use disorders. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2019; 236:1513–1530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bravo JA, Forsythe P, Chew MV, Escaravage E, Savignac HM, Dinan TG, Bienenstock J, Cryan JF. Ingestion of Lactobacillus strain regulates emotional behavior and central GABA receptor expression in a mouse via the vagus nerve. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011; 108:16050–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Xiao HW, Ge C, Feng GX, Li Y, Luo D, Dong JL, Li H, Wang H, Cui M, Fan SJ. Gut microbiota modulates alcohol withdrawal-induced anxiety in mice. Toxicol Lett 2018; 287:23–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Koob GF. Neurobiology of Opioid Addiction: Opponent Process, Hyperkatifeia, and Negative Reinforcement. Biol Psychiatry 2020; 87:44–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ianiro G, Tilg H, Gasbarrini A. Antibiotics as deep modulators of gut microbiota: between good and evil. Gut 2016; 65:1906–1915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lee K, Vuong HE, Nusbaum DJ, Hsiao EY, Evans CJ, Taylor AMW. The gut microbiota mediates reward and sensory responses associated with regimen-selective morphine dependence. Neuropsychopharmacology 2018; 43:2606–2614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kiraly DD, Walker DM, Calipari ES, Labonte B, Issler O, Pena CJ, Ribeiro EA, Russo SJ, Nestler EJ. Alterations of the Host Microbiome Affect Behavioral Responses to Cocaine. Sci Rep 2016; 6:35455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Weiland A, Garcia S, Knackstedt LA. Ceftriaxone and cefazolin attenuate the cue-primed reinstatement of alcohol-seeking. Frontiers in Pharmacology 2015; 6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Alshehri FS, Hakami AY, Althobaiti YS, Sari Y. Effects of ceftriaxone on hydrocodone seeking behavior and glial glutamate transporters in P rats. Behav Brain Res 2018; 347:368–376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Stapff MP. Using real world data to assess cardiovascular outcomes of two antidiabetic treatment classes. World journal of diabetes 2018; 9:252–257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rudd RA, Aleshire N, Zibbell JE, Gladden RM. Increases in Drug and Opioid Overdose Deaths — United States, 2000–2014. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 2016; 64:1378–1382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.McHugh RK, Votaw VR, Sugarman DE, Greenfield SF. Sex and gender differences in substance use disorders. Clinical Psychology Review 2018; 66:12–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Agabio R, Campesi I, Pisanu C, Gessa GL, Franconi F. Sex differences in substance use disorders: focus on side effects. Addiction Biology 2016; 21:1030–1042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Vasilenko SA, Evans-Polce RJ, Lanza ST. Age trends in rates of substance use disorders across ages 18–90: Differences by gender and race/ethnicity. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2017; 180:260–264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dethlefsen L, Huse S, Sogin ML, Relman DA. The pervasive effects of an antibiotic on the human gut microbiota, as revealed by deep 16S rRNA sequencing. PLoS biology 2008; 6:e280–e280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jernberg C, Löfmark S, Edlund C, Jansson JK. Long-term ecological impacts of antibiotic administration on the human intestinal microbiota. The ISME Journal 2007; 1:56–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Knackstedt LA, Melendez RI, Kalivas PW. Ceftriaxone Restores Glutamate Homeostasis and Prevents Relapse to Cocaine Seeking. Biological Psychiatry 2010; 67:81–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sari Y, Sakai M, Weedman JM, Rebec GV, Bell RL. Ceftriaxone, a Beta-Lactam Antibiotic, Reduces Ethanol Consumption in Alcohol-Preferring Rats. Alcohol and Alcoholism 2011; 46:239–246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hearing M, Graziane N, Dong Y, Thomas MJ. Opioid and Psychostimulant Plasticity: Targeting Overlap in Nucleus Accumbens Glutamate Signaling. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2018; 39:276–294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Welling GW, Meijer-Severs GJ, Helmus G, van Santen E, Tonk RH, de Vries-Hospers HG, van der Waaij D. The effect of ceftriaxone on the anaerobic bacterial flora and the bacterial enzymatic activity in the intestinal tract. Infection 1991; 19:313–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Vincent C, Miller MA, Edens TJ, Mehrotra S, Dewar K, Manges AR. Bloom and bust: intestinal microbiota dynamics in response to hospital exposures and Clostridium difficile colonization or infection. Microbiome 2016; 4:12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Acharya C, Betrapally NS, Gillevet PM, Sterling RK, Akbarali H, White MB, Ganapathy D, Fagan A, Sikaroodi M, Bajaj JS. Chronic opioid use is associated with altered gut microbiota and predicts readmissions in patients with cirrhosis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2017; 45:319–331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zhernakova A, Kurilshikov A, Bonder MJ, Tigchelaar EF, Schirmer M, Vatanen T, Mujagic Z, Vila AV, Falony G, Vieira-Silva S, Wang J, Imhann F, Brandsma E, Jankipersadsing SA, Joossens M, Cenit MC, Deelen P, Swertz MA, Weersma RK, Feskens EJM, Netea MG, Gevers D, Jonkers D, Franke L, Aulchenko YS, Huttenhower C, Raes J, Hofker MH, Xavier RJ, Wijmenga C, Fu J. Population-based metagenomics analysis reveals markers for gut microbiome composition and diversity. Science 2016; 352:565–569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Meng J, Yu H, Ma J, Wang J, Banerjee S, Charboneau R, Barke RA, Roy S. Morphine induces bacterial translocation in mice by compromising intestinal barrier function in a TLR-dependent manner. PLoS One 2013; 8:e54040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Banerjee S, Sindberg G, Wang F, Meng J, Sharma U, Zhang L, Dauer P, Chen C, Dalluge J, Johnson T, Roy S. Opioid-induced gut microbial disruption and bile dysregulation leads to gut barrier compromise and sustained systemic inflammation. Mucosal Immunol 2016; 9:1418–1428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Salarian A, Kadkhodaee M, Zahmatkesh M, Seifi B, Bakhshi E, Akhondzadeh S, Adeli S, Askari H, Arbabi M. Opioid Use Disorder Induces Oxidative Stress and Inflammation: The Attenuating Effect of Methadone Maintenance Treatment. Iran J Psychiatry 2018; 13:46–54. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Dennis BB, Samaan MC, Bawor M, Paul J, Plater C, Pare G, Worster A, Varenbut M, Daiter J, Marsh DC, Desai D, Thabane L, Samaan Z. Evaluation of clinical and inflammatory profile in opioid addiction patients with comorbid pain: results from a multicenter investigation. Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment 2014; 10:2239–2247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.O’Sullivan SJ, Malahias E, Park J, Srivastava A, Reyes BAS, Gorky J, Vadigepalli R, Van Bockstaele EJ, Schwaber JS. Single-Cell Glia and Neuron Gene Expression in the Central Amygdala in Opioid Withdrawal Suggests Inflammation With Correlated Gut Dysbiosis. Frontiers in Neuroscience 2019; 13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Roberts RM, Bohm MK, Bartoces MG, Fleming-Dutra KE, Hicks LA, Chalmers NI. Antibiotic and opioid prescribing for dental-related conditions in emergency departments: United States, 2012 through 2014. J Am Dent Assoc 2020; 151:174–181.e1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Dana R, Azarpazhooh A, Laghapour N, Suda KJ, Okunseri C. Role of Dentists in Prescribing Opioid Analgesics and Antibiotics: An Overview. Dent Clin North Am 2018; 62:279–294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES