Skip to main content
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy : CII logoLink to Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy : CII
. 2025 Nov 18;74(12):377. doi: 10.1007/s00262-025-04225-7

Construction and application of a humanized mouse model for prostate cancer in immunotherapy

Wenwen Guo 1,2,#, Hui Li 1,#, Yong Zhao 1, Jing Qin 1, Han Meng 1, Xu Ge 1, Caiqin Zhang 1,✉, Changhong Shi 1,✉
PMCID: PMC12627316  PMID: 41251708

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) exhibits low sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibitors due to insufficient T cell infiltration and the dominance of immunosuppressive cells in the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). Immunotherapy-based combination therapy proves to be an effective strategy in overcoming immune resistance. However, the development and optimization of such therapies necessitate an accurate preclinical model capable of replicating the complex TIME of PCa. To address this need, we developed a humanized mouse model that closely mimics the TIME of PCa patients. This model was created by transplanting human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) into severe combined immunodeficient mice. We systematically investigated factors influencing immune reconstitution, including donor variability, cell dosage, and recipient characteristics. Furthermore, the model was employed to establish a human PCa xenograft, which enabled us to assess the therapeutic efficacy and explore the underlying mechanisms of the combination therapy involving docetaxel and pembrolizumab. The results revealed that both the donor origin and the quantity of transplanted PBMCs had a significant impact on immune reconstitution. In our preclinical evaluations, the combination therapy of docetaxel with immunotherapy showed superior efficacy in both cell line-derived and patient-derived xenograft models when compared to monotherapy approaches. This enhanced efficacy is attributed to the increased infiltration of CD8+ T cells within the TIME. Our study successfully establishes a reliable humanized mouse model for PCa. The promising outcomes of the combination therapy observed in this model could potentially lay the groundwork for innovative clinical applications designed to overcome immune resistance in PCa.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00262-025-04225-7.

Keywords: Humanized mouse model, Immunotherapy, Prostate cancer, Tumor microenvironment, Combination therapy

Introduction

Immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), targets cancer by enhancing or restoring the body's anti-tumor immune response [1]. However, the benefits of ICI therapy are not universal; even within the same tumor type, different subtypes may respond variably to immunotherapy2−3. It is now widely recognized that these disparities are largely due to differences in the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) [2]. Consequently, understanding and manipulating the TIME is crucial for improving the effectiveness of immunotherapy. Numerous clinical trials have explored the combination of immunotherapy with conventional treatments, such as chemotherapy, to extend the benefits of immunotherapy to a broader patient population [3, 4].

Prostate cancer (PCa) remains the leading cause of male mortality from malignancy globally [5]. Most cases of PCa are androgen-dependent, which can often be cured but may eventually progress to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). CRPC is resistant to current treatments such as androgen deprivation therapy and chemotherapy, with a 5-year relative survival rate of only 30.2% [6, 7]. Over the past decade, the treatment landscape of CRPC has been revolutionized by novel therapies such as second-generation anti-androgens, chemotherapeutics, radiopharmaceuticals, and cancer vaccines [8]. For example, Sipuleucel-T, an autologous cellular immunotherapy, was the first cancer vaccine for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) to receive FDA approval and illuminated the potential of immunotherapy in treating PCa [9]. However, subsequent monotherapy with ICI proves to be ineffective in the majority of PCa due to the low infiltration of T cells and presence of immunosuppressive cells [10]. Investigating and modifying the TIME of PCa are a promising avenue that has sparked a series of innovative clinical trials aimed at overcoming immune resistance in PCa [11]. However, before conducting clinical trials, preclinical experiments are required to explore the therapeutic effects and toxicity of potential combination therapy regimens.

For preclinical studies on PCa, it is crucial to choose an ideal model that can accurately replicate the TIME of human PCa. Traditional preclinical models of PCa are unsuitable for clinical immunotherapeutic drug testing due to the absence of a human immune system [12, 13]. In recent years, humanized mice capable of bearing human tumor cells have received increasing attention. Humanized mice are usually constructed by engrafting human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (Hu-PBMCs) into severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) mice, resulting in the development of a human immune system in these mice [14]. Humanized mice engrafted with PBMCs were chosen for this study due to their rapid T cell reconstitution (2–3 weeks), which facilitates short-term evaluation of immunotherapy combinations. While models using CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells enable multilineage immune cell development, prostate cancer’s immune microenvironment is dominated by T cell dysfunction, making T cell-focused PBMC models suitable for initial mechanistic studies [15, 16]. Specifically, the proportion of hCD45+ T cells in mouse peripheral blood surpasses 25% by the third week, indicating successful construction of the model. T cells dominate the human immune system in this model, accounting for over 90% of its population [17, 18]. Hu-PBMC models possess their own merits and demerits, with numerous preclinical studies utilizing this model for the assessment of immunotherapeutic drugs.

In this study, we initially established and assessed a humanized mouse model utilizing PBMCs. Subsequently, we investigated the impact of strain, gender, donor and other factors on the reconstitution of the humanized mouse model. We then implanted both cell line-derived xenograft (CDX) and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) into humanized mice to evaluate the efficacy of docetaxel combined with pembrolizumab therapy. The aim of our study was to establish a robust preclinical platform for evaluating novel immunotherapeutic strategies against PCa.

Material and methods

Mice and cell lines

Four to seven-week-old NOD-PrkdcscidIl2rgtm1/Vst (NPG) SCID mice were purchased from Biocytogen (Beijing, China), while B-NDG-B2m mice were obtained from Vitalstar (Beijing, China). All mice weighed 18 ± 2 g and were housed in the SPF barrier facility of the Fourth Military Medical University (FMMU). The human PCa cell lines LNCaP-FGC, 22RV1, C4-2, DU145, and PC3 were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin–streptomycin. The cells were maintained in a constant-temperature incubator at 37 °C and 5% CO2, with the culture medium being refreshed every alternate day.

Establishment of Hu-PBMC-CDX models and Hu-PBMC-PDX models

PBMCs were isolated from healthy adult donors (20–45 years old, sex recorded) using Lymphoprep (Tbdscience, Tianjin, China). Donors were screened to exclude individuals with active infections (e.g., HIV, hepatitis B/C), a history of autoimmune or chronic inflammatory diseases, recent (≤ 6 months) use of immunosuppressive medications, or a history of malignancy. PBMCs (1 × 107) were transplanted into NPG or B-NDG-B2m mice via the tail vein. The construction was deemed successful when the proportion of hCD45+CD3+ T cells in mouse blood exceeded 25% [19, 20]. PBMCs were cryopreserved using a standard protocol: cells were resuspended in cryopreservation solution (Procell, Wuhan, China), frozen in a controlled rate, and thawed rapidly in 37 °C water bath. Post-thaw cells were washed and resuspended in medium, with viability > 90% confirmed by trypan blue exclusion before transplantation.

HLA-class-I alleles (HLA-A, -B, and -C) of 22RV1 cell and PBMCs were analyzed by Organ Transplantation Research Institute of Chinese People's Liberation Army (Supplementary Table 1). Donors with at least partial HLA-class-I allele matching (≥ 50% compatibility) were prioritized for experiments to minimize HLA mismatch-related tumor rejection [21].

5 × 106 22RV1 cells were injected into the right axilla of humanized mice subcutaneously to establish hu-PBMC-CDX models. One PDX model (B45354) was established by our laboratory from an androgen-independent PCa patient; a high metastatic potential was observed [22]. Tumor volume was calculated as [length × width2]/2.

Both hu-PBMC-CDX and hu-PBMC-PDX models were randomly assigned into 4 groups, followed by intraperitoneally administration (Phosphate-buffered saline, twice per week for three consecutive weeks, n = 5; pembrolizumab (Merck & Co. Inc), 10 mg.kg−1 per injection, twice per week for three consecutive weeks, n = 5; and docetaxel (MedChemExpress, HY-B0011), 10 mg.kg−1 per injection, once per week for three consecutive weeks, n = 5; docetaxel and pembrolizumab, n = 5.

Flow cytometry

Peripheral blood, spleen, and bone marrow-derived single-cell suspensions were prepared and then incubated with BD Pharmingen™ FITC mouse anti-human CD45 (clone HI30) and BD Pharmingen™ PE mouse anti-Human CD3 (clone UCHT1). Additionally, PBMCs were also incubated with BD Horizon™ BV510 mouse anti-Human CD45 (563,204), eBioscience™ PE anti-Human CD8a (2,504,504) and BioLegend™ Pacific Blue Granzyme B (372,218). Cell collection was performed using FC500 (Beckman Coulter, Miami, FL. USA), and data analysis was performed using the FlowJo software (TreeStar, San Carlos, USA).

Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence microscopy

Immunohistochemistry was performed using the following antibodies: anti-human CD45 (ab8216), CD4 (ab183685), and CD8 (ab108343) from Abcam. Images were acquired and analyzed using an inverted microscope (OLYMPUS, Tokyo, Japan). Immunofluorescence was conducted with anti-human CD45 (Clone HI30), CD8 (SK1), and CD4 (QA18A35) from BioLegend. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (BioLegend).

Statistical analysis

All data are presented as the mean ± standard error (SE) and were analyzed using GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, San Diego, USA). For multi-group comparisons, data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. Normality and homogeneity of variances were verified prior to analysis. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant, with adjustments for multiple comparisons performed using Tukey’s HSD method.

Results

Construction of the Hu-PBMC mouse model

To establish a humanized mouse model that can faithfully recapitulate the immune system of cancer patients, we transplanted 1 × 107 PBMCs isolated from healthy donors into adult SCID mice via the tail vein. The purity of these PBMCs was confirmed to be greater than 90%, ensuring that only the highest quality cells were used in this critical procedure (Fig. 1a, b). 3 weeks after the initial transplantation, peripheral blood samples were collected for flow cytometry analysis to evaluate the proportion of human CD45+CD3+ T cells. Generally, successful reconstitution requires a human T cell percentage greater than 25% in mice. Dynamic monitoring revealed a reconstitution success rate of 60% (6/10) by the third week (Fig. 1c). Furthermore, we performed functional assays on the reconstituted human T cells within the mice, which showed Granzyme B positivity, indicating that the reconstituted human T cells in the humanized mouse model are functional (Supplementary Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

The construction of a mouse model with a humanized immune system a Timeline of the construction of the Hu-PBMC mouse model. Specifically, 1 × 107 PBMCs were transplanted into adult SCID mice via the tail vein. After 2–3 weeks, peripheral blood samples were collected and the levels of human CD45+CD3+ T cells were analyzed using flow cytometry. b Flow cytometry was used to test the purity of CD45+ immune cells in isolated PBMCs. c The peripheral blood was collected three weeks after PBMC transplantation, and the proportion of human T cells was analyzed. d The body weight changes of 10 mice were recorded after PBMC transplantation. e A correlation analysis was analyzed to determine the association between the level of peripheral T cell and GVHD response. The percentage of body weight loss on day 40 relative to day 0 were regarded as a substitution of GVHD (n = 10)

Notably, all Hu-PBMC mice developed graft-versus-host reactions (GVHDs) at approximately week 6, which were caused by cytokine secretion from human immune cells, particularly CD8+ T cells. Prominent symptoms included weight loss, which commonly commences at 20–30 days post-transplantation and became severe by day 40. GVHDs in humanized mice ultimately result in mortality within 8–10 weeks (Fig. 1d). In addition to this, affected mice may also exhibit a hunching posture that suggests discomfort or pain. Alopecia, or hair loss, is another common sign of GVHDs in humanized mice (data not shown). To further investigate, we conducted a correlation analysis to determine the potential association between the level of peripheral T cell and the severity of GVHD response. Specifically, we measured the percentage of body weight loss on day 40 relative to day 0 and assessed peripheral T cell levels. The analysis revealed a strong positive correlation between peripheral immune reconstitution and GVHD severity (r = 0.860, p = 0.0014) (Fig. 1e). Therefore, selecting a humanized mouse model with a moderate proportion of hCD45+CD3+ T cells is optimal for experiments to balance immune functionality and minimize GVHD-related complications.

In summary, while GVHD-induced mortality limits the therapeutic window of Hu-PBMC mice, this model remains invaluable for preclinical studies of short-term immunotherapy due to its rapid and straightforward reconstruction process.

The reconstituted immune system is present in various organs

To fully confirm the widespread distribution of the reconstituted immune system beyond its presence in peripheral blood, we analyzed T cell levels across multiple organs. This investigation aimed to deepen our understanding of how the newly formed immune system interacts with and integrates into various bodily systems. 6 weeks post-reconstitution, the mice were humanely sacrificed, and their tissues were systematically analyzed. The results obtained from flow cytometry revealed comparable levels of T cells in the blood and spleen, while lower levels were observed in their bone marrow (Fig. 2a). To further investigate the distribution of immune cells, immunohistochemical staining was performed on spleen and bone marrow samples. The analysis showed substantial infiltration of CD45+ immune cells and CD3+ T cells in these organs, with a quantitatively higher presence in the spleen compared to the bone marrow (Fig. 2b, c). The distribution of immune cells was then assessed in additional organs, including the lungs, colon, liver, and heart. Notably, the lungs, liver, and colon demonstrated significant infiltration of CD45+ immune cells, including CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, whereas the heart exhibited minimal immune cell infiltration (Fig. 2d, e). Interestingly, this organ-specific variability in immune cell infiltration was observed not only in humanized mice but also in normal mice, suggesting that inherent organ-specific factors influence immune cell distribution. These findings collectively demonstrate that the reconstituted human immune system in humanized mice is robustly established and naturally distributed across multiple organs. This comprehensive integration highlights the utility of the model for investigating systemic immune responses in preclinical studies.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Distribution of human immune cells in various organs of Hu-PBMC mice. a Flow cytometry analysis of hCD45+CD3+ T cells in peripheral blood, spleen, and bone marrow collected from mice six weeks post-PBMC transplantation, (n = 6). b, c Immunohistochemical staining and quantification of hCD45+ immune cells and CD4+ and CD8+ T cell subsets in the spleen and bone marrow, showing levels of infiltration and distribution. Scale bars: 50 μm. d, e Immunofluorescence detection of hCD45+ immune cells and CD4+ and CD8+ T cell subsets in lung, colon, liver, and heart, with quantification of immune cell distribution differences across organs. Scale bar represents 20 µm, (n = 6). *p < 0.01, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001

Exploration of factors affecting the humanized mouse model

The successful construction of humanized mice is influenced by multiple factors. To minimize donor variability and improve model consistency, we first compared the reconstitution levels of Hu-PBMCs from different donors. Dynamic monitoring of four donor-derived PBMCs showed varying reconstitution trends, with the highest reconstitution observed in donor 1 and the lowest in donor 4 (Fig. 3a, b). These results indicate that the donor source plays a significant role in the success of humanization. Furthermore, while all of the humanized mice experienced weight loss due to GVHDs 3–4 weeks after PBMC transplantation, each donor-derived mouse exhibited a distinct trend. GVHDs caused by donors 1 and 4 resulted in the most significant and least significant weight loss, respectively (Fig. 3c). The findings indicate that mice with high reconstitution levels are more prone to severe GVHDs. Additionally, the survival monitoring of mice revealed that those derived from donor 4 had the longest median survival of 46 days (Fig. 3d). Therefore, it appears feasible to cryopreserve donors with optimal reconstitution effects for future stable reconstitutions. To this end, we subsequently compared the reconstitution levels of fresh and cryopreserved PBMCs. The results indicate comparable reconstitution efficacy between cryopreserved/resuscitated PBMCs and fresh PBMCs (5/6 vs. 6/6), providing a theoretical basis for subsequent stable construction of humanized mice (Fig. 3e).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Factors influencing the reconstitution of the humanized mouse model. a Flow cytometry comparison of reconstitution levels at week 3 post-PBMC transplantation from three different donors into the same mouse strain (n = 5 mice per donor). b Dynamic monitoring of reconstitution levels for four additional donor-derived PBMCs at weeks 3, 4, 5, and 6 (n = 6 mice per donor). Labeling conventions differ to distinguish between independent donor sets used in sequential phases of the study. c Body weight changes of humanized mice constructed with PBMCs from the four donors (n = 6 mice per donor). d Survival time recording and comparison for humanized mice constructed with PBMCs from the four donors (n = 6 mice per donor). Survival curves were compared using the log-rank test; no significant differences were observed between donors (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). e Reconstitution levels comparison between fresh and cryopreserved PBMCs from the same donor (n = 6 mice per condition). f Reconstitution levels in female and male mice transplanted with the same dose of PBMCs (n = 8 mice per gender). g Comparison of reconstitution levels in mice transplanted with different doses of PBMCs (5 × 106, 1 × 107, 2 × 107, and 3 × 107) (n = 8 mice per dose). h, j Dynamic monitoring of reconstitution levels and survival rates in NPG and B-NDG-B2m mice transplanted with the same donor PBMCs, along with body weight changes (n = 8 mice per strain)

Furthermore, we conducted investigation into the impact of gender on reconstitution as subsequent PCa transplantation experiments necessitate the use of male mice. PBMCs (1 × 107) were transplanted into mice of the same strain, with both female and male subjects included. The results of dynamic monitoring showed that male mice exhibited lower rates and levels of reconstitution success (Fig. 3f). To tackle this issue, we escalated the transplantation dosage of PBMCs to 2 × 107 and 3 × 107 cells respectively. The findings demonstrated that increasing the transplantation dose of PBMCs could improve the levels of hCD45+ immune cells in male mice (Fig. 3g). However, due to the positive correlation between the degree of peripheral immune reconstitution and the severity of GVHD, we chose to use dosage of PBMCs to 2 × 107 as reconstruction dosage for male mice.

Finally, we investigated the impact of mouse strain on reconstitution. We transplanted the same donor-derived PBMCs into two common SCID mice (NPG and B-NDG-B2m). The levels of peripheral hCD45+ cells, body weight, and survival rates were recorded twice a week. As shown in Fig. 3h, reconstituted NPG and B-NDG-B2m mice had comparable reconstruction levels, while B-NDG-B2m mice had a relatively longer study window. Survival monitoring confirmed that the reconstituted NPG mice had a limited lifespan of approximately 40 days, while B-NDG-B2m mice exhibited a relatively prolonged survival time (> 60 days) (Fig. 3i). Furthermore, it was observed that the body weight of reconstituted NPG mice declined rapidly due to GVHDs, whereas the B-NDG-B2m mice remained comparatively stable during this period (Fig. 3j). Further histopathological analysis of skin, liver, and colon tissues harvested at 4–5 weeks post-reconstitution confirmed significantly more severe tissue damage in NPG mice compared to B-NDG-B2m mice (Supplementary Fig. 2). These findings suggest that the successful construction of humanized mice is influenced by multiple factors, including the donor and dosage of PBMCs, as well as the strain and gender of recipient mice, but not by the donor gender.

Establishment and characterization of a Hu-PBMC mouse model for prostate cancer

After successfully establishing a stable humanized mouse model, we selected appropriate human PCa cell lines to generate a xenograft model of PCa, referred to as a CDX. Given that PD-L1 functions as a biomarker for immunotherapy and is closely linked to the response to immunotherapy in other types of cancer, we analyzed the PD-L1 expression in several commonly used PCa cell lines to identify suitable candidates for subsequent investigation. Results showed that the 22RV1 cell line exhibited the highest PD-L1 expression (Fig. 4a and Supplementary Fig. 3), making it the optimal choice for subsequent in vivo studies.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Construction and characterization of the Hu-PBMC mouse model of prostate cancer. a PD-L1 expression levels in four common prostate cancer cell lines (22RV1, LNCaP, C4-2, PC3, and DU145) assessed by western blotting. b Establishment of the humanized mouse model of prostate cancer by subcutaneous transplantation of 22Rv1 cells (5 × 106 cells/mouse) into NPG mice one-week post-PBMC transplantation. Tumor growth was monitored dynamically. c Tumor growth rate comparison between humanized constructed with five distinct PBMCs donor (n = 5 mice per group). d Impact of HLA-class-I alleles matching between PBMCs and 22RV1 cells on tumor growth in reconstituted mice (n = 4 mice per HLA matching condition). e Immunofluorescence analysis of CD45+ and CD8+ T cell distribution within tumors at the end of the experiment. f Flow cytometry analysis of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in tumors from humanized mice. g Representative immunofluorescence images and quantitative analysis of CD8+ T cells expressing the inhibitory receptor PD-1 within tumors. h Immunohistochemical analysis of biopsy specimens from three clinical patients with prostate cancer, assessing the infiltration and distribution of hCD45+ immune cells and CD4+ and CD8+ T cell subsets. Scale bars: 20 μm for e and g, and 50 μm for immunohistochemical staining in (h). *p < 0.01

To construct the CDX model, 5 × 106 22RV1 cells were transplanted into the right flank of mice one week after PBMC transplantation (Fig. 4b). We observed variable tumor growth rates among humanized mouse models reconstituted with PBMCs from different donors, which could be attributed to human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatches (Fig. 4c). Further study confirmed that HLA-class-I alleles (HLA-A, -B, and -C), as well as serotypes, matching between PBMCs and 22RV1 cells inhibited the growth of tumor (Fig. 4d). Consequently, mice reconstituted with HLA-matched PBMC donors were selected for experimental analyses. To exclude confounding effects of intrinsic donor immune activity, we implanted HLA-mismatched tumors (PC3/DU145) in mice reconstituted with different donors (one originally HLA-matched to 22RV1, the other mismatched). Tumor growth showed no significant differences between donors, and CD8+ T cell infiltration remained equivalent (Supplementary Fig. 4), confirming HLA-matching as the primary driver of tumor suppression.

At week six, all mice were euthanized, and tumor samples were harvested to analyze the TIME. Immunofluorescence revealed sparse infiltration of CD45+ immune cells and CD8+ T cells in both the central and peripheral tumor regions (Fig. 4e). Flow cytometry corroborated these findings, demonstrating low levels of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (Fig. 4f). Additionally, a substantial proportion of CD8+ T cells within the tumor express the inhibitory receptor PD-1, highlighting the "cold" tumor phenotype characteristic of the humanized mouse-derived PCa model (Fig. 4g). To further validate the model's ability to replicate the TIME of clinical PCa, immunohistochemical analyses were conducted on tumor specimens from three patients. Similar to the 22RV1-derived CDX models, the three clinical specimens also exhibited certain levels of PD-L1 expression, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 5). Further, the immune cell infiltration patterns observed in these clinical specimens also mirrored the “cold” tumor and microenvironment seen in the mouse model (Fig. 4h). In summary, despite the challenges of achieving complete HLA matching between PBMCs and implanted tumor cells, the co-engrafted humanized mouse model partially recapitulates the TIME of clinical PCa. This model holds significant potential for translational immuno-oncology research and the development of novel therapeutic strategies.

Docetaxel and pembrolizumab synergistically inhibit prostate cancer growth in CDX model

Given the limited clinical efficacy of ICIs monotherapy, we conducted combination therapy in the CDX model to assess whether chemotherapy could potentiate the antitumor activity of ICIs. We opted to evaluate the effectiveness of combination therapy by merging docetaxel, which is the primary clinical treatment for mCRPC, with pembrolizumab (a representative ICI in the clinic) [23]. Firstly, matching PBMCs were transplanted into the mice. 1 week later, 22RV1 cancer cells were inoculated into these humanized mice, which were subsequently treated with docetaxel, pembrolizumab, or a combination of the two drugs. Phosphate-buffered saline was used as the therapeutic control (Fig. 5a). The results demonstrated that docetaxel or pembrolizumab monotherapy did not significantly impede tumor growth; however, its efficacy was augmented when used in combination, as evidenced by reduced tumor weight (Fig. 5b, c). Overall, these results provide valuable insights into potential avenues for improving cancer treatments and highlight the importance of exploring combination therapies as a means of enhancing their effectiveness.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Synergistic inhibition of prostate cancer growth by docetaxel and pembrolizumab in the CDX model. a Schematic representation of the humanized mouse model construction and treatment protocol for prostate cancer. 22RV1 cells (5 × 106) were inoculated into NPG mice one week after PBMC transplantation, and treatments were initiated when the tumor volume reached 80–100 mm3 (n = 5 mice per treatment group). b Tumor volumes were monitored and recorded at the indicated days post-treatment initiation. Data points represent mean tumor volume ± SEM (n = 5 mice per group). c Photographs of tumors harvested from each treatment group post-therapy. d–g Immunohistochemical analysis of CD45+, CD4+, and CD8+ T cell infiltration in tumor tissues. Scale bar, 100 µm. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001

Further mechanistic studies demonstrated that combination therapy significantly increased the infiltration of CD45+ immune cells into the tumor microenvironment. Detailed analysis revealed a similar trend for CD4+ and CD8+ T cell populations, highlighting the role of combination therapy in promoting the recruitment and activation of functional immune cells (Fig. 5d–g). Notably, although docetaxel monotherapy did not increase the overall number of CD8+ T cells, further analysis revealed an increased proportion of CD8+ Granzyme B+ T cells within the tumor. To functionally validate this observation, we utilized two complementary in vitro systems: (1) HLA-matched 22RV1-CD8 + T cell co-cultures and (2) patient-derived organoid (PDO) co-cultures with CD8+ T cells. Both models consistently demonstrated that docetaxel treatment significantly enhanced CD8+ T cell cytotoxicity, as evidenced by elevated LDH release in 22RV1 co-cultures and reduced tumor viability in PDOs (Supplementary Fig. 6).

In summary, the combination of docetaxel and pembrolizumab effectively inhibited tumor growth by enhancing immune cell infiltration and activity. These results support the development of combination therapies as a promising strategy to improve the efficacy of cancer treatments.

Docetaxel and pembrolizumab synergistically inhibit prostate cancer growth in PDX model

Considering the limitations of CDX model in simulating the tumor microenvironment, we further transplanted PDX model into the humanized mouse model for combination therapy. The PDX model, previously developed in our laboratory, exhibits multi-organ metastatic potential and was specifically selected for this study due to its characteristics of neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) [22]. These traits were confirmed by positive expression of synaptophysin (SYP), a neuroendocrine carcinoma marker, consistent with the original tumor tissue, and negative expression of chromogranin A (CGA) in the PDX model (Fig. 6a).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Enhancement of anti-tumor effects by docetaxel in combination with pembrolizumab in the PDX model of prostate cancer. a Expression of neuroendocrine carcinoma marker synaptophysin (SYP) in the PDX model, consistent with the original tissue, indicating the preservation of tumor characteristics. b Tumor volume measurements recorded at specified intervals following treatment initiation with docetaxel, pembrolizumab, or the combination of both in NPG derived humanized mice (n = 5 mice per treatment group). c, d Immunofluorescence analysis of CD45+ immune cells, CD4+, and CD8+ T cell infiltration within the tumor microenvironment post-treatment. Scale bars, 50 µm. *p < 0.01, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001

To construct the humanized PDX model, cryopreserved PBMCs with optimal reconstitution capabilities were transplanted into mice approximately 2 weeks after PDX engraftment. Following model establishment, the mice were treated with docetaxel, pembrolizumab, or a combination of both, while phosphate-buffered saline served as the control. While combination therapy significantly reduced tumor volumes (p < 0.05), both docetaxel and pembrolizumab monotherapies showed modest antitumor effects. The difference between pembrolizumab monotherapy and combination therapy was not statistically significant (p > 0.05) (Fig. 6b). To elucidate the mechanisms underlying the observed synergy, we conducted a microenvironment analysis across different treatment groups. As illustrated in Fig. 6c, d, immunofluorescence results demonstrated that pembrolizumab monotherapy modestly increased CD45+ immune cell and CD8+ T cell infiltration, while combination therapy elicited a more pronounced immune cell recruitment and activation within the tumor microenvironment.

It is worth noting that the incorporation of docetaxel into immunotherapy has shown promising results in augmenting the infiltration of immune cells within tumor microenvironments. This, in turn, can lead to a remarkable shift in the phenotype of patient-derived xenografts (PDX) from an immune-desert (“cold” tumor) to an immune-inflamed (“hot” tumor). This phenotypic shift is critical, as it enhances tumor susceptibility to immune attack by increasing immune cell abundance and activity within the TIME. These findings underscore the potential of docetaxel to augment the efficacy of immunotherapeutic strategies, paving the way for more effective combination treatments in cancer therapy.

Discussion

Preclinical studies using humanized mouse models have been crucial for evaluating immunotherapeutic drugs and developing new treatments, yet such models for PCa are rare. This study presents a comprehensive evaluation of a humanized mouse model for PCa, exploring factors influencing its construction and assessing the efficacy of combination therapy (docetaxel and pembrolizumab) using both CDX and PDX models.

We have demonstrated that the level of reconstitution is influenced by donor type, PBMCs dose, and mouse strain/gender, but not by the donor gender. In addition, mice with high levels of reconstitution tend to experience more severe GVHDs. Verma et al. transplanted varying doses of PBMCs into immunodeficient mice and dynamically monitored the levels of human CD45+ immune cells within mice [24]. We found that further augmenting the quantity of PBMCs (2 × 107) not only elevated the level of human immune cells in peripheral but also enhanced the proportion of successful reconstitution. In addition, we have further demonstrated that the degree of reconstitution in humanized mice varies among different PBMC donors, indicating a donor-dependent effect. Therefore, we cryopreserved donors with optimum reconstitution levels for subsequent resuscitation and transplantation. GVHD-induced mortality limits the therapeutic window of Hu-PBMC mice, but strategies such as donor selection for moderate reconstitution, adjusted PBMC dosages, or use of B2M-knockout strains (e.g., B-NDG-B2M) can prolong the study window [24, 25]. It is worth noting that the Hu-PBMC model primarily contains functional T cells, rather than other immune subpopulations. In future, the Hu-HSC mouse model, constructed using human CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells, will be able to develop other subpopulations in addition to T cells, such as B cells and NK cells [26].

The immune humanized mouse models with human tumor cells or tissues show potential for clinical research, whereas previous studies mainly use mismatched tumors and immune systems (allogeneic PBMCs). HLA matching is crucial for eliciting tumor antigen-specific T cell responses. For instance, Wang et al. generated CD8+ T cells reactive to neoantigen peptides by coculturing patient-derived organoids with HLA-class-I matched PBMCs (HLA-A, -B, and -C at least half matched) [21]. Our study found significant variations in tumor growth rates among humanized mice with PBMCs from different donors. In addition, the HLA-class-I alleles and serotypes compatibility between PBMCs and 22RV1 cells significantly suppressed tumor growth [27]. This suggests that T cells can still recognize 22RV1 cells despite low HLA expression. Using autologous PBMCs or tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) from the same tumor tissue may be a promising approach to avoid these problems. However, autologous PBMC or TILs amplification and acquisition are challenging, especially in patients undergoing radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Some scholars currently believe that using next-generation sequencing technology to match allogeneic PBMCs with tumors may be a solution [21].

Preclinical models that can successfully mimic the TIME of PCa are essential for immunotherapy. As previously stated, the TIME, especially the infiltration of CD8+ T cells, plays a pivotal role in determining the efficacy of ICI therapy [28]. In preclinical models and clinical specimens, we observed that the TIME of PCa exhibits a state of low immune infiltration, commonly referred to as a “cold tumor,” which is thought to be responsible for the low response to immunotherapy of PCa [29]. In fact, growing evidence from both preclinical models and clinical studies has demonstrated that docetaxel can promote immune cell activation and infiltration through multiple mechanisms, including induction of immunogenic cell death in tumor cells, enhancement of antigen presentation, and modulation of the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment [30–32]. Liu et al. suggest that other treatment modalities, such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy, should be prioritized to improve the TIME and convert a “cold” into a “hot” one that is more responsive to immunotherapy [33]. As for PCa, a variety of therapies, such as chemotherapy, tumor vaccines, and hormone therapy, have also been proposed to potentially improve the TIME.

The construction of humanized models for PCa is crucial for the subsequent development of various immunotherapy regimens. In our study, we investigated the effect of docetaxel combined with pembrolizumab in this model and explored its underlying mechanism. In addition, there are numerous promising combination regimens currently in development, underscoring the critical role of preclinical research. For instance, Cohort C of Keynote 365 is testing the effects of pembrolizumab in combination with enzalutamide in patients with abiraterone-intolerant or progressive mCRPC [34]. Similarly, CheckMate 9KD is a phase II trial that is testing the combination of nivolumab and enzalutamide in mCRPC patients [35]. Additionally, clinical trials such as NCT05655715 and NCT03795207 are exploring novel combinations of immunotherapies with other treatment modalities. These innovative approaches may ultimately transform the TIME of PCa from "cold" to "hot" to improve the immunotherapy of PCa.

In summary, multiple strategies and drug combinations are currently being investigated to overcome immune resistance in PCa. The construction of a humanized mouse model of PCa has played a pivotal role in elucidating the tumor microenvironment and is considered an optimal platform for preclinical evaluation of novel drugs and therapies.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Abbreviations

CDX

Cell line-derived xenograft

CRPC

Castration-resistant prostate cancer

GVHDs

Graft-versus-host reactions

HLA

Human leukocyte antigen

Hu-PBMC

Human peripheral blood mononuclear cell

ICIs

Immune checkpoint inhibitors

mCRPC

Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

ORR

Objective response rate

PBMCs

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells

PCa

Prostate cancer

PDX

Patient-derived xenograft

SCID

Severe combined immunodeficiency

TIME

Tumor immune microenvironment

Author contributions

W.G.: Conceptualization; writing—original draft. H.L.: Data curation. Y.Z.: Data curation. J.Q.: Conceptualization. H.M.: Writing—review and editing. X.G.: Data curation. C.Z.: Writing—original draft. C.S.: Conceptualization; writing—review and editing.

Funding

The work was funded by the Shaanxi Province Innovation Capability Support Plan (2025JC-GXPT-043), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 32270566) and the Laboratory Animal Foundation Program (No. SYDW_KY 2021-14).

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Consent to participate

Written informed consent was obtained from the participants and the patient with PCa, respectively.

Ethics approval

All animal experimental protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of FMMU (Protocol No. 20220705). Fresh peripheral blood and PCa tumor tissue were collected from the Xi’jing Hospital in Xi'an and approved by the Medical Ethics Committee (KY20203128-1).

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Wenwen Guo and Hui Li are contributed equally to this work.

Contributor Information

Caiqin Zhang, Email: zhangcaiqin@fmmu.edu.cn.

Changhong Shi, Email: changhong@fmmu.edu.cn.

References

  • 1.Pardoll DM (2012) The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer 12:252–264 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Binnewies M, Roberts E, Kersten K, Chan V, Fearon D, Merad M, Coussens L, Gabrilovich D, Ostrand-Rosenberg S, Hedrick C, Vonderheide R, Pittet M, Jain R, Zou W, Howcroft T, Woodhouse E, Weinberg R, Krummel M (2018) Understanding the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) for effective therapy. Nat Med 24:541–550 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Galluzzi L, Humeau J, Buqué A, Zitvogel L, Kroemer G (2020) Immunostimulation with chemotherapy in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 17:725–741 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pala L, De Pas T, Conforti F (2022) Boosting anticancer immunotherapy through androgen receptor blockade. Cancer Cell 40:455–457 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Siegel R, Miller K, Fuchs H, Jemal A (2022) Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin 72:7–33 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kirby M, Hirst C, Crawford E (2011) Characterising the castration-resistant prostate cancer population: a systematic review. Int J Clin Pract 65:1180–1192 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Karantanos T, Corn P, Thompson T (2013) Prostate cancer progression after androgen deprivation therapy: mechanisms of castrate resistance and novel therapeutic approaches. Oncogene 32:5501–5511 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Teo M, Rathkopf D, Kantoff P (2019) Treatment of advanced prostate cancer. Annu Rev Med 70:479–499 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Higano C, Small E, Schellhammer P, Yasothan U, Gubernick S, Kirkpatrick P, Kantoff P (2010) Sipuleucel-T. Nat Rev Drug Discov 9:513–514 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Xu P, Wasielewski L, Yang J, Cai D, Evans C, Murphy W, Liu C (2022) The immunotherapy and immunosuppressive signaling in therapy-resistant prostate cancer. Biomedicines. 10.3390/biomedicines10081778 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nagireddy S, Qureshi R, Best J, Frech F, Shah K, Soni Y, Kuchakulla M, Narasimman M, Arora H (2021) Current treatment modalities targeting tumor microenvironment in castration-resistant prostate cancer. Adv Exp Med Biol 1329:295–323 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Murillo-Garzón V, Kypta R (2017) WNT signalling in prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol 14:683–696 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ghoochani A, Hsu E, Aslan M, Rice M, Nguyen H, Brooks J, Corey E, Paulmurugan R, Stoyanova T (2021) Ferroptosis inducers are a novel therapeutic approach for advanced prostate cancer. Cancer Res 81:1583–1594 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.De La Rochere P, Guil-Luna S, Decaudin D, Azar G, Sidhu S, Piaggio E (2018) Humanized mice for the study of immuno-oncology. Trends Immunol 39:748–763 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Guo W, Zhang C, Qiao T, Zhao J, Shi C (2021) Strategies for the construction of mouse models with humanized immune system and evaluation of tumor immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Front Oncol 11:673199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zhao Y, Shuen T, Toh T, Chan X, Liu M, Tan S, Fan Y, Yang H, Lyer S, Bonney G, Loh E, Chang K, Tan T, Zhai W, Chan J, Chow E, Chee C, Lee G, Dan Y, Chow P, Toh H, Lim S, Chen Q (2018) Development of a new patient-derived xenograft humanised mouse model to study human-specific tumour microenvironment and immunotherapy. Gut 67:1845–1854 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Shultz L, Keck J, Burzenski L, Jangalwe S, Vaidya S, Greiner D, Brehm M (2019) Humanized mouse models of immunological diseases and precision medicine. Mamm genome off j Int Mamm Genome Soc 30:123–142 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pyo K, Kim J, Lee J, Kim S, Cho J, Lim S, Cho B (2019) Promising preclinical platform for evaluation of immuno-oncology drugs using Hu-PBL-NSG lung cancer models. Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 127:112–121 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Meraz I, Majidi M, Meng F, Shao R, Ha M, Neri S, Fang B, Lin S, Tinkey P, Shpall E, Morris J, Roth J (2019) An improved patient-derived xenograft humanized mouse model for evaluation of lung cancer immune responses. Cancer Immunol Res 7:1267–1279 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yin L, Wang X, Chen D, Liu X, Wang X (2020) Humanized mouse model: a review on preclinical applications for cancer immunotherapy. Am J Cancer Res 10:4568–4584 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wenwen W, Tinggan Y, Lili M, Yanjing Z, Jinxia B, Xiaofang Z, Yan Z, Yali Z, Yani Z, Shuai Y, Xinyao Q, Siyun S, Rui W, Tong W, Hongyang W, Dong G, Peng W, Lei C (2022) Hepatobiliary tumor organoids reveal HLA class I neoantigen landscape and antitumoral activity of neoantigen peptide enhanced with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Adv Sci (Weinh) 9(22):2105810 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Shi C, Chen X, Tan D (2019) Development of patient-derived xenograft models of prostate cancer for maintaining tumor heterogeneity. Transl Androl Urol 8:519–528 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Galsky M, Vogelzang N (2010) Docetaxel-based combination therapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer. Ann Oncol 21:2135–2144 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Verma B, Wesa A (2020) Establishment of humanized mice from peripheral blood mononuclear cells or cord blood CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells for immune-oncology studies evaluating new therapeutic agents. Curr Protoc Pharmacol 89:e77 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wenwen G, Caiqin Z, Tianyun Q, Jumei Z, Changhong S (2021) Strategies for the construction of mouse models with humanized immune system and evaluation of tumor immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Front Oncol 11:673199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chuprin J, Buettner H, Seedhom MO, Greiner DL, Keck JG, Ishikawa F, Shultz LD, Brehm MA (2023) Humanized mouse models for immuno-oncology research. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 20(3):192–206 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Giatromanolaki A, Michos GD, Xanthopoulou E, Koukourakis MI (2024) HLA-class-I expression loss, tumor microenvironment and breast cancer prognosis. Cell Immunol 399:104816 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Li T, Qiao T (2022) Unraveling tumor microenvironment of small-cell lung cancer: implications for immunotherapy. Semin Cancer Biol 86:117–125 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Olino K, Park T, Ahuja N (2020) Exposing hidden targets: combining epigenetic and immunotherapy to overcome cancer resistance. Semin Cancer Biol 65:114–122 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zehua M, Weiwei Z, Baijun D, Zhixiang X, Yiyi J, Ruopeng S, Kai S, Jiahua P, Qi W, Wei X (2022) Docetaxel remodels prostate cancer immune microenvironment and enhances checkpoint inhibitor-based immunotherapy. Theranostics 12(11):4965 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Animesh K, Dolly J, Sandeep K, Kajal R, Sanjay P, Kajal R, Raunak K, Somesh K J, Nihal M, Prabhu Srinivas Y, Nishant P, Devashish M, Harsh S, Debanjan B, Manas K P, Ravi Datta S, Aasheesh S, Usha A, Arnab M, Sagar S, Veena S P, Avinash B, Ujjaini D (2023) A localized hydrogel-mediated chemotherapy causes immunogenic cell death via activation of ceramide-mediated unfolded protein response. Sci Adv 9(26): 2746 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 32.Karim F, Pablo GM, Daniel C, Jose N M, Arash RK, David S, Juan C VL, Héctor M SL, Andrew J A, Lisa H, Diogo A B, Neha P A, Jia L, Keziban U-K, Margitta R, Fred S, Daniel P P, Russell K P (2021) Nivolumab plus docetaxel in patients with chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: results from the phase II CheckMate 9KD trial Eur J Cancer 160: 61–71 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 33.Liu Y, Sun Z (2021) Turning cold tumors into hot tumors by improving T-cell infiltration. Theranostics 11:5365–5386 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Yu E, Piulats J, Gravis G, Fong P, Todenhöfer T, Laguerre B, Arranz J, Oudard S, Massard C, Heinzelbecker J, Nordquist L, Carles J, Kolinsky M, Augustin M, Gurney H, Tafreshi A, Li X, Qiu P, Poehlein C, Schloss C, de Bono J (2023) Pembrolizumab plus olaparib in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: Long-term results from the phase 1b/2 KEYNOTE-365 cohort A study. Eur Urol 83:15–26 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Fizazi K, Retz M, Petrylak D, Goh J, Perez-Gracia J, Lacombe L, Zschäbitz S, Burotto M, Mahammedi H, Gravis G, Bastos D, McCune S, Vázquez Limón J, Kwan E, Castellano D, Fléchon A, Saad F, Grimm M, Shaffer D, Armstrong A, Bhagavatheeswaran P, Amin N, Ünsal-Kaçmaz K, Wang X, Li J, Loehr A, Pachynski R (2022) Nivolumab plus rucaparib for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: results from the phase 2 CheckMate 9KD trial. J Immunother Cancer. 10.1136/jitc-2022-004761 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.


Articles from Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy : CII are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES