Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Oct 6.
Published in final edited form as: Kidney Int. 2025 Oct 31;109(1):89–100. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2025.09.028

Preclinical evaluation of antigen-specific B-cell depletion for phospholipase A2 receptor membranous nephropathy with chimeric autoantibody receptor T-cells

Burcin Altun 1,*, Gexin Zhao 2,*, Baomei Wang 1, Xuming Mao 1, Silvio Manfredo-Vieira 1, Elinor Willis 3, Enrico Radaelli 3, Emma E Goodman 1, Alina C Boesteanu 4, Saar I Gill 4, Darshil R Patel 5, Steven Wong 5, Ebony Cottman-Thomas 5, Jonathan J Hogan 5, Aimee S Payne 2
PMCID: PMC12611422  NIHMSID: NIHMS2120854  PMID: 41177511

Abstract

Introduction:

Phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R)-associated membranous nephropathy (MN) is a leading cause of nephrotic syndrome in adults, driven by autoantibodies that target PLA2R on kidney podocytes. Antibody-based therapy with rituximab induces broad B-cell depletion but is associated with risks of serious infection and reduced efficacy in patients with high proteinuria. Here, we determined the feasibility of developing chimeric autoantibody receptor T-cell (CAART) therapy for PLA2R-specific B-cell depletion in PLA2R MN.

Methods:

PLA2R-CAART was produced by T-cell lentiviral transduction. In vitro cytotoxicity and specificity were evaluated against B-cell lines targeting PLA2R immunodominant epitopes and primary PLA2R MN B-cells. Adsorption of PLA2R MN IgG was evaluated to determine the extent of pathogenic autoantibody targeting by candidate PLA2R-CAART designs. Specific cytotoxicity, engraftment capability, and off-target toxicity were evaluated in a xenografted anti-PLA2R Nalm-6 preclinical mouse model, with additional toxicology screening by human membrane proteome arrays.

Results:

We engineered CAARTs targeting key PLA2R epitopes to selectively deplete autoreactive B-cells. C17- and C178-CAART (encompassing CysR, CTLD1, CTLD7, with/without CTLD8 domains) were successfully expressed on primary T-cells and demonstrated specific in vitro cytotoxicity against anti-PLA2R B-cell lines targeting CysR, CTLD1, and CTLD7 epitopes. In co-incubation assays with primary B-cells or plasma from patients with MN, C17- and C178-CAART significantly reduced anti-PLA2R B-cells and adsorbed 69–97% of plasma anti-PLA2R antibody reactivity. In vivo, C17- and C178-CAART treatment in the Nalm-6 xenograft model resulted in significant reduction in target cell outgrowth with C17-CAART showing slight but consistently increased cytotoxic activity. Specificity testing through comprehensive in vivo pathologic analysis and a high-throughput membrane proteome array analysis showed no significant off-target binding for either C17- or C178-CAART.

Conclusions:

Our findings establish preclinical proof-of-concept for the therapeutic potential of antigen-specific B-cell depletion by PLA2R-CAART. Additional studies are required to determine clinical feasibility of PLA2R-CAART for PLA2R MN therapy.

Keywords: autoimmunity, cell therapy, chimeric antigen receptor, kidney, nephrology

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-2120854-f0001.webp

Introduction

Phospholipase A2 receptor-associated membranous nephropathy (PLA2R MN) is one of the most common causes of nephrotic syndrome in adults, characterized by the deposition of subepithelial immune complexes in the glomeruli. In approximately 70–80% of patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy, PLA2R is the major autoantigen targeted by circulating autoantibodies, which are predominantly of the IgG4 subclass1. Anti-PLA2R immune complexes on podocytes initiate complement-mediated damage, resulting in the hallmark features of subepithelial deposits, podocyte effacement, and nephrotic-range proteinuria2–4.

Current treatment strategies for PLA2R MN rely on broad immunosuppression, utilizing agents such as corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, cyclophosphamide, or the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab to suppress autoantibody production and immune-mediated kidney injury. While rituximab has shown therapeutic potential in reducing circulating PLA2R antibody titers and inducing remission of PLA2R MN, its therapeutic value is hindered by the non-specific nature of B-cell depletion, which risks infectious complications, and the potential for reduced serum half-life of rituximab in patients with nephrotic-range proteinuria, which can lead to incomplete B-cell depletion and relapsed or refractory disease5,6.

Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CART) therapy has transformed the treatment paradigm for B-cell cancers by engineering a patient’s own T-cells to potently and durably deplete B-cells, both malignant and healthy. Recently, chimeric autoantibody receptor (CAAR) technology has been developed as a more targeted approach for treating autoimmune diseases by selectively depleting autoreactive B-cells. In contrast to CART therapy, which targets T-cell cytotoxicity using an anti-CD19 antibody fragment to induce pan B-cell depletion, CAAR T-cell (CAART) therapy uses the antigen targeted by autoreactive antibodies to target the B-cell receptor (BCR) on autoreactive B-cells. CAAR-engineered immune cells have demonstrated preclinical activity in a growing number of models, including anti-desmoglein 3 pemphigus vulgaris, muscle-specific tyrosine kinase and acetylcholine receptor myasthenia gravis, anti-NMDAR encephalitis, La/ssB- or IFN-γ-autoantibody-associated disease, and more recently, anti-PLA2R and THSD7A MN7–14. A major challenge in the development of CAART for PLA2R MN is the size and complexity of the PLA2R antigen. A prior study evaluated the preliminary potential of a PLA2R cysteine-rich (CysR) domain CAAR design for PLA2R MN and evaluated activity via in vitro killing of PLA2R-specific hybridoma B-cells, although in vivo efficacy and potential off-target effects were not investigated9. Here, we present in vitro and in vivo preclinical pharmacologic and toxicologic studies evaluating PLA2R-specific CAART for the selective depletion of pathogenic anti-PLA2R B-cells in MN.

Methods

Cells

293T and Jurkat cells were obtained from the University of Pennsylvania. Primary human T-cells were provided by the Human Immunology Core (UPenn). PBMCs from MN patients were collected with informed consent. Anti-PLA2R hybridomas were obtained from Genscript, and Nalm-6 cells from ATCC.

Stimulation, transduction, and expansion of T-cells

Primary T-cells and Jurkat cells were cultured in RPMI with 10% FBS and supplements. T-cells were stimulated with anti-CD3/CD28 beads and IL-2, then transduced with CAAR or control lentivirus and expanded for 10–14 days. CAAR expression was confirmed by flow cytometry.

Animal experiments

NSG mice (6–8 weeks, female) were injected with luciferase+ anti-PLA2R Nalm-6 cells and treated with C17- or C178-CAART (3.5–7×106 cells). Tumor burden was monitored by bioluminescence imaging, and T-cell persistence assessed in spleen and bone marrow. A total of 39 mice were used across three independent experiments. All procedures were approved by IACUC.

Additional details for all methods are provided in the Supplementary Methods.

Results

Preliminary Design and Validation of PLA2R-CAART Against Anti-PLA2R B-cells

Phospholipase A2 Receptor (PLA2R) is a transmembrane protein belonging to the mannose receptor superfamily. It contains cysteine-rich (CysR), fibronectin type II (FnII), and eight C-type lectin-like domains (CTLD1–8) in its extracellular region (Figure 1A). The CysR domain comprises the major immunodominant epitopes in PLA2R MN15, whereas CTLD1 and CTLD7 immunoreactivity are more likely to be observed in refractory cases with poor renal prognosis16,17, The CysR domain interacts with the CTLD3 domain to form a ring-like structure15 (Figure 1A), raising the possibility that these sequences may adopt a compact conformation important for PLA2R immunoreactivity. However, a smaller PLA2R fragment consisting of only the CysR, FnII, and CTLD1 domains was sufficient to adsorb all anti-PLA2R immunoreactivity in PLA2R MN patient sera18.

Figure 1. Design and Validation of PLA2R CAAR Constructs.

Figure 1.

(A) Structural model of human PLA2R (PDB: 7QSR) highlighting the CysR, FNII, and CTLD1–8 domains.

(B) Design of PLA2R-CAAR constructs C17 and C178, targeting different combinations of PLA2R domains (CysR, CTLD1, CTLD7 for C17; CysR, CTLD1, CTLD8 for C178). The native PLA2R domains and their arrangement are depicted.

(C) Expression of C17- and C178-CAAR constructs on primary human T-cells, assessed by flow cytometry. Non-transduced (NTD) T-cells were used as a negative control. The percentage of hPLA2R-positive cells is indicated.

(D) Percentage of CAAR+ T-cells over time, normalized to Day 5 for each construct (C17 and C178). NTD T-cells are shown relative to Day 5 of C17 as a negative control, n=4.

(E) Cytotoxicity of primary human PLA2R CAART co-cultured with luciferase-expressing hybridoma target cells (13D10–1, anti-CysR; 12G10–2, anti-CTLD1; 2B2–2, anti-CTLD7) at different effector-to-target (E:T) ratios of 30:1, 10:1, and 3:1. Cytotoxicity was assessed at 4 hours (upper panel) and 20 hours (lower panel). NTD T-cells were used as a negative control, n=3.

(F) IFN-γ secretion by C17-CAART, C178-CAART and NTD T-cells during the cytotoxicity assay, measured by ELISA at 24 hours. Data are presented as mean ± SEM.

CAAR design should incorporate immunodominant epitopes while avoiding domains that could lead to undesirable off-target interactions. Additionally, the size of the CAAR extracellular domain may affect cytotoxic activity, as larger intercellular distances between T-cells and target cells do not exclude CD45 phosphatase from the immune synapse, thereby limiting T-cell receptor signaling19. We therefore evaluated three initial CAAR constructs: CF1237 (comprising CysR, FnII, CTLD1, CTLD2, CTLD3, and CTLD7), CF17 (CysR, FnII, CTLD1, and CTLD7), and C17 (CysR, CTLD1, and CTLD7), the latter designed to exclude the FnII domain due to its potential interactions with collagen and integrin β1 and its lack of reported epitope activity in PLA2R MN. Lentiviral transduction of CAAR constructs into primary human T-cells resulted in robust cell surface expression (Figure S1A).

Anti-PLA2R B-cell receptor (BCR) sequences from PLA2R MN patients have not previously been reported. To generate anti-PLA2R B-cells targeting immunodominant PLA2R epitopes, we immunized mice with a recombinant human PLA2R protein fragment containing CysR, FnII, CTLD1, and CTLD7 domains. Nine hybridoma cell lines with reactivity to human PLA2R by ELISA were identified (Figure S1B). We generated Jurkat cell lines expressing CysR, CF1, and C17 CAAR extracellular domains and deduced the epitope reactivity of each hybridoma clone by flow cytometry. Three clones (2B2, 12G10, and 13D10), each targeting distinct PLA2R domains (CTLD7, CTLD1, and CysR, respectively), were sequenced and selected for subsequent cytotoxicity assays (Figure S1C).

Preliminary cytotoxicity assays revealed that both C17-CAART and CF17-CAART induced cytolysis of anti-PLA2R hybridomas (Figure S1D). In contrast, CF1237-CAART demonstrated limited cytotoxicity associated with no IFN-γ release, comparable to negative control co-cultures (Figure S1E). Given the potential risk of off-target binding of the FnII domain and the lack of cytotoxic activity from the CF1237 construct, we selected C17 for further development based on its preserved cytotoxicity across a range of soluble anti-PLA2R antibody concentrations (Figure S1F).

During the course of this study, a report identified that 16% of PLA2R MN patient sera demonstrate CTLD8 reactivity20, although two prior epitope mapping studies did not identify CTLD8 reactivity in PLA2R MN sera15,16, and CTLD8 reactivity does not correlate with the total anti-PLA2R antibody level20, suggesting that anti-CTLD8 antibodies, if present, comprise a minority of the anti-PLA2R antibodies within each patient. Nevertheless, we designed and evaluated an additional CAAR construct, C178, which comprises the CysR, CTLD1, CTLD7, and CTLD8 domains of PLA2R (Figure 1B).

Both C17- and C178-CAART efficiently expressed their respective PLA2R epitopes on the T-cell surface, with C17-CAART showing more consistent surface expression during T-cell expansion (Figure 1C–D). We assessed their cytotoxic activity against hybridomas expressing BCRs specific for CysR, CTLD1, or CTLD7 domains. Both C17- and C178-CAART demonstrated antigen-specific killing of all three hybridoma targets, accompanied by comparable IFN-γ secretion (Figure 1E–1F), with C17-CAART consistently exhibiting slightly higher cytolytic potency across all targets.

Soluble Autoantibody Effects on PLA2R-CAART Cytotoxicity

Given that MN patients demonstrate circulating anti-PLA2R IgG that could potentially interfere with CAART cytolysis, we further compared the cytotoxic activity of C17- and C178-CAART in the presence of soluble monoclonal IgG targeting distinct PLA2R domains (Figure 2A), a situation in which the soluble IgG would be neutralizing, as well as patient-derived MN plasma IgG (Figure 2B–2C). The physiologic range of anti-PLA2R IgG observed in MN patients was below 100 μg/mL in 118 of 120 reported patients, with a mean level of 9–16 μg/mL21,22,15. A recent study reported mean anti-PLA2R IgG levels of 210 μg/mL in MN patients compared to 120 μg/mL in healthy controls23, the latter being higher than most of the previously reported MN patients. We therefore tested CAART function in the presence of soluble monoclonal IgG at concentrations up to 100 μg/mL. After 4 hours of co-culture with target cells, a modest reduction in cytotoxicity was observed when PLA2R-CAARTs were exposed to soluble monoclonal anti-PLA2R IgG, especially when the specificity of the soluble IgG matched that of the monoclonal BCR target. However, after 20 hours of incubation, decreased inhibition of cytotoxicity was observed. Negligible cytotoxicity was observed with negative control co-cultures (NTD T-cells with anti-PLA2R target cells, or PLA2R-CAART with anti-desmocollin 1 (Dsc1) hybridoma cells) (Figure 2A). Co-incubation of polyclonal MN plasma IgG in PLA2R-CAART killing assays at a physiologic concentration of up to 10 mg/mL IgG caused a modest reduction in cytotoxicity at the 4-hour time point for both C17- and C178-CAART at an E:T ratio of 30:1, with more pronounced inhibition at a lower E:T ratio of 3:1. After 20 h of co-incubation, cytotoxicity at 30:1 was largely restored, whereas at 3:1 it was partially restored, indicating that longer co-incubation time can partially overcome the soluble autoantibody blockade (Figure 2B–2C).

Figure 2. Evaluation of PLA2R-CAART Cytotoxicity in the Presence of Soluble Anti-PLA2R IgG.

Figure 2.

(A) Luciferase-based cytotoxicity assay was performed to evaluate the specific killing capacity of PLA2R-CAART after 4 hours and 20 hours of co-culture with target cells at an E:T ratio of 30:1. The cytotoxicity of C17- and C178-CAART was assessed in the presence of monoclonal anti-PLA2R IgG targeting different domains of PLA2R (CysR, CTLD1, CTLD7). Transduction efficiency of C17- and C178-CAART is displayed on the left.

(B-C) PLA2R-CAART cytotoxicity against anti-PLA2R hybridoma cells (1:1:1 polyclonal mixture of anti-PLA2R target cells) in the presence of physiologic concentrations of patient-derived MN plasma IgG was measured at an E:T ratio of 30:1(B) or 3:1(C). Hybridomas targeting desmocollin 1 (Dsc1) were used as a negative target cell control, and NTD T-cells were used as a negative effector cell control. Data are shown as mean ± SEM from duplicate cultures (A, B); panel C shows results from a single sample.

PLA2R-CAARTs Effectively Eliminate Anti-PLA2R B-Cells and Engraft In An In Vivo Xenograft Model

CAART therapy aims to selectively eliminate B-cells producing pathogenic autoantibodies. However, establishing an in vivo model for CAART targeting anti-PLA2R in membranous nephropathy (MN) is challenging. Mouse PLA2R is not expressed in the murine podocyte24 and human anti-PLA2R IgG does not cross-react with mouse PLA2R25, limiting translational studies using human PLA2R MN plasma samples to induce clinical disease. Another study developed a human PLA2R transgenic mouse model using the adenoviral EIIa ubiquitous promoter26. We performed immunohistochemical analysis of kidneys of these mice, but did not observe expression of human PLA2R on the podocyte membrane (Figure S2A).

We therefore used an anti-PLA2R Nalm-6 xenograft model for the focused purpose of comparing the in vivo cytotoxic activity and evaluating the engraftment capability of PLA2R-CAART compared to a clinically-approved anti-CD19 CART (CART19) in a well-established model. Nalm-6 cells were engineered to express anti-PLA2R BCRs. In initial in vitro cytotoxicity assays in which CART19, C17-CAART, and C178-CAART demonstrated similar levels of surface CA(A)R expression (Figure 3A), C17-CAART specifically killed Nalm-6 cells expressing anti-PLA2R BCRs (12G10, 13D10, and 2B2), comparable to CART19 positive control cells (Figure 3B). Kinetics of C178-CAART cytolysis were delayed compared to CART19 after 4 hours of target cell co-culture, but were comparable after 20 hours.

Figure 3. In Vitro Cytotoxicity of CAARTs Targeting Anti-PLA2R Nalm-6 Cells.

Figure 3.

(A) Flow cytometric analysis of Nalm-6 cells transduced with anti-CD19 CAR (CAR19) or PLA2R-CAAR constructs (C17, C178).

(B) Cytotoxicity assay results for PLA2R-CAART (C17, C178) and CART19 against Nalm-6 cells expressing WT PLA2R or specific epitopes (12G10, 13D10, 282). Cytotoxicity is measured at 4 and 20 hours post co-culture at varying E:T ratios (1:1, 3:1, 10:1, and 30:1). NTD T-cells serve as the negative control. Data are shown as mean ± SEM from duplicate cultures.

Having validated the in vitro cytolytic activity of C17- and C178-CAARTs in vitro, we next compared the ability of C17- and C178-CAART to eliminate anti-PLA2R Nalm-6 cells and engraft in vivo, in comparison to anti-CD19 CARTs. On Day 0, an equimolar mixture of Nalm-6 cells expressing anti-PLA2R BCRs (2B2, 12G10, and 13D10, 1 × 106 total) were injected into mice, followed by treatment with either C17- or C178-CAARTs, CART19 (positive control), or NTD T-cells (negative control) on Day 4 (7 × 106 total T-cells) (Figure 4A). Serial bioluminescence imaging (BLI) was conducted to monitor target cell burden in vivo. Both C17- and C178-CAART, along with CART19 positive control, significantly reduced Nalm-6 target cell burden compared to the NTD control group. Target cell outgrowth, measured by total flux (photons/second), was significantly lower in the CAART-treated groups, with C17-CAART showing slightly higher reduction in target cell burden compared to C178-CAART (Figures 4B–4C). Comparable results were observed in two additional independent experiments (7 × 106 T-cells/mouse, Figure 4B-experiment 2, and 3.5 × 106 T-cells/mouse, Figure 4B-experiment 3).

Figure 4. In Vivo Cytotoxicity and Engraftment of PLA2R-CAART in a Nalm-6 Xenograft Model.

Figure 4.

(A) Schematic of the experimental timeline. 1 × 106 Nalm-6 cells comprising an equimolar mixture of 2B2, 12G10 and 13D10) were injected intravenously into mice on Day 0. On day 4, the mice were treated with either 7 × 106 PLA2R-CAART (C17 or C178), anti-CD19 CART (CART19, positive control), or NTD T-cells. Harvest occurred on day 21–24 (experiment 1) or day 21 (experiments 2–3).

(B) Nalm-6 cell burden over time (measured by total flux) in NSG mice treated with C17-, C178-CAART or CART19 cells. Mice received either 7 × 106 T-cells per mouse (experiment 1 and 2) or 3.5 × 106 T-cells per mouse (experiment 3). CART19 was included as a positive control and NTD T-cells as a negative control in the high-dose cohort (experiment 1 and 2). NTD T-cells were included as a control in the lower-dose cohort (experiment 3). Total flux (photons/sec) was measured using BLI in individual mice at the indicated time points following T-cell infusion. Each line represents one mouse.

(C) Bioluminescence imaging (BLI) of anti-PLA2R target cell burden in mice. BLI was performed at multiple time points (Days 4, 7, 12, and 21). The color bar indicates the total flux range in photons per second (p/s).

(D) Flow cytometric analysis of CD3+ and CAAR+ T-cells in bone marrow and spleen following T-cell infusion. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (B), Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test (D); *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. ns = not significant.

To evaluate in vivo persistence, we analyzed the frequency of CD3+ and CAAR+ T-cells in bone marrow and spleen at the time of study termination. CD3+ T-cell frequencies were comparable across C17-, C178-CAART, and CART19 groups in bone marrow, while CART19 showed significantly higher CD3+ frequencies in the spleen (Figure 4D, S3). As expected, CAAR+ cells were only detected in the C17- and C178-CAART groups, with no CAAR+ population in the CART19 group. Notably, C17-CAART, but not C178-CAART, showed a significantly higher proportion of persisting CAAR+ cells than the non-CAAR expressing CART19 control. Although differences in persistence of C17- and C178-CAART in both bone marrow and spleen were not statistically significant, these trends suggest that C17 may exhibit improved in vivo persistence or surface CAAR stability, supporting its selection as the final candidate for further development.

C17- and C178-CAART Adsorb Anti-PLA2R Antibodies and Reduce anti-PLA2R B-Cells in MN Patient Samples In Vitro

We next evaluated C17- and C178-CAART against PLA2R MN samples. We first assessed whether C17- and C178-CAART could adsorb the majority of plasma anti-PLA2R antibodies, which would indicate that they target the majority of anti-PLA2R BCRs in MN patients. Plasma levels of anti-PLA2R antibodies were measured in eight MN patient samples before and after incubation with C17- and C178-CAART, with NTD T-cells serving as a negative control. C17- and C178-CAART reduced anti-PLA2R antibody levels by 57% to 96% (median 87.9% adsorption with C178-CAART compared to 84.3% median adsorption with C17-CAART, Figure 5A). The comparable immunoadsorption profiles suggest that CTLD8-reactive antibodies do not comprise a substantial portion of total anti-PLA2R antibodies within each patient.

Figure 5. Evaluation of Anti-PLA2R Antibody Adsorption and Primary PLA2R MN B-Cell Killing Efficiency by C17- and C178-CAART.

Figure 5.

(A) Plasma from eight patients with MN (MN1–MN8) was incubated with either non-transduced (NTD) T-cells or PLA2R-CAART (C17 or C178), and anti-PLA2R antibody levels were measured by ELISA (expressed as RU/mL). The percentage values above each bar represent the reduction in antibody levels following incubation with C17-CAART (blue) or C178-CAART (red), relative to the non-transduced control.

(B) The proportion of detected anti-PLA2R B-cells among total circulating IgG+ B-cells was determined in primary MN patient PBMC samples by B-cell ELISpot.Original images are shown in FigureS4A.

(C-D) The killing efficiency of C17- and C178-CAART, measured as a percentage of anti-PLA2R B-cell elimination after CAART co-culture with patient B-cells from MN1, MN2, and MN3. Data are presented as mean ± SEM in (C) and as the corresponding numbers and frequencies in (D). Anti-CD19 CAR T cells (CART19) served as a positive control. Original images are shown in FigureS4B.

We next assessed the antigen-specific cytotoxic efficacy of C17- and C178-CAART against primary B-cells from PLA2R MN patients, the intended target cells in a therapeutic setting. Anti-PLA2R B-cells were identified in B-cell samples from eight MN patients, with their proportion among IgG+ B-cells found to be 0.08% to 0.54% (median 0.32%, Figure 5B, S4A). Co-culture experiments with IgG+ B-cells from MN patients revealed anti-PLA2R B-cell killing by both C17- and C178-CAART, 79.3– 93.2% reduction with C17-CAART and 67.9– 81.1% reduction with C178-CAART, with C17-CAART showing a slight advantage in killing efficiency (Figure 5C–D, S4B). These results suggest that C17- and C178-CAART can bind the vast majority of anti-PLA2R BCRs and demonstrates cytotoxic activity against primary anti-PLA2R B-cells in PLA2R MN patients.

PLA2R-CAAR did not demonstrate specific off-target cytotoxicity

To evaluate potential off-target cytotoxic effects of C17- and C178-CAART in vivo, we performed comprehensive histopathological analysis in comparison to donor-matched CART19-treated controls. Mononuclear cell infiltration scores, including large pleomorphic cells possibly reflecting activated T-cells or Nalm-6 cells, were generally similar across most tissues between PLA2R-CAART– and CART19-treated mice (Figure 6A–B). Lymphoid organs such as lymph nodes and spleen showed consistently high infiltration in all groups without cytotoxicity, reflecting engraftment in these tissues. C17-treated mice exhibited slightly higher infiltration in the liver, salivary/lacrimal glands, and pancreas compared to both C178 and CART19. Despite these tissue-specific differences, the overall infiltration burden did not differ significantly between groups (p=0.76), although a mild increase in liver cell injury was observed in C17-CAART compared to C178-CAART and CART19-treated groups, generally reflecting the level of liver cell infiltration (Figure 6A versus Figure 6C). This finding was attributed to xenogeneic graft-versus-host reaction. Mild, sporadic degenerative changes were observed in renal tubules, pancreatic acini, and liver biliary tracts, with no lesion uniquely enriched in the PLA2R-CAART-treated groups (Figure 6C). Sternal fracture or rib dislocation in 2 mice treated with C178-CAART or CART19, respectively, were attributed to trauma from mouse handling (Figure 6D). Other histopathologic findings and organ weights were also comparable across treatment groups, suggesting no substantial organ inflammatory response or immune cell infiltration associated with PLA2R-CAART treatment (Figure 6D–E).

Figure 6. Evaluation of Off-Target Binding Interactions of PLA2R-CAART by Comprehensive Pathologic Analysis and Membrane Proteome Array.

Figure 6.

Grading is based on a 0–4 scale, where 0 represents unremarkable findings and 4 represents severe changes. Organs listed in methods that do not appear in panels A-D had no remarkable findings.

(A) and (B) Heatmap displaying the extent of mononuclear cell and large pleomorphic cell infiltration across various organs.

(C) The severity of tissue damage, including hepatocellular death (liver), biliary hyperplasia (liver), acinar degeneration (pancreas), tubular degeneration/regeneration (kidney), and adipose tissue necrosis.

(D) Background histopathological findings, including extramedullary hematopoiesis (liver, spleen), alveolar histiocytosis (lungs), lobular atrophy (salivary glands), and mineralization (stomach).

(E) The weights of various organs (liver, spleen, left kidney, right kidney, and heart) were measured in NSG mice treated with C17-, C178-CAART and CART19. Data are presented as individual values with mean ± SEM.

(F) Membrane proteome array analysis of target binding by C17-hFc and C178-hFc. The 10G7–2 is an anti-PLA2R antibody used as positive control. Horizontal line indicates cutoff for significant off-target binding relative to isotype controls.

As an unbiased method to identify unexpected off-target interactions against human proteins, we performed a high-throughput membrane proteome array (MPA) screen of approximately 6,000 human membrane proteins, using a recombinant chimera of C17 or C178 linked to the human antibody Fc domain (hFc), and the anti-PLA2R antibody 10G7 as a positive control. Both C17-hFc and C178-hFc constructs demonstrated specific binding to Fc receptors FCGR2B and FCGR1A, which are known to bind human Fc, with no significant additional off-target interactions detected. The binding profiles of C17 and C178 indicated minimal differences in target engagement between the two constructs (Figure 6F).

Discussion

In this study, we developed PLA2R-CAART for the targeted elimination of pathogenic anti-PLA2R B-cells, a potential precision immunotherapeutic approach for PLA2R MN. To achieve B-cell depletion across a broad spectrum of immunodominant epitopes, we aimed to include all pathogenic PLA2R domains within the CAAR design. However, large extracellular domains can hinder effective immunoreceptor synapse formation, which limits the ability to include all PLA2R extracellular epitopes in the CAAR design19. Furthermore, certain domains, such as the fibronectin type II (FnII) domain and CTLDs, have the potential to introduce undesirable biologic activity in vivo. The FnII domain binds collagen, which could theoretically result in CAART retention in certain tissues, and CTLDs non-specifically bind glycoproteins, particularly when multiple CTLDs are expressed in tandem, potentially leading to off-target tissue targeting. Based on the patient autoantibody epitope mapping data and the preclinical pharmacology and toxicology data presented here, we selected C17-CAART, encompassing the PLA2R CysR, CTLD1, and CTLD7 domains, as a lead candidate for further preclinical development.

Our results demonstrate that both C17 and C178-CAART maintained potent and specific cytotoxicity against anti-PLA2R-expressing hybridomas, Nalm-6 cells and patient-derived B-cells (Figure 1E, 3B, 5C–D). C17- and C178-CAAR were expressed on the T-cell surface during ex vivo expansion, with C17 showing more stable surface expression over time, whereas C178 expression declined modestly (Figure 1D). These findings may in part explain the modest decreases in cytotoxic function observed with C178-CAART compared to C17-CAART in vitro and in vivo, although high E:T ratios and longer co-incubation periods could overcome these differences (Figure 1E). Similarly, decreased cytotoxic activity of C17- and C178-CAART were observed in the presence of neutralizing anti-PLA2R IgG, again mitigated by higher E:T ratios and longer co-incubation periods (Figure 2).

In vivo, we employed a xenograft model in which human anti-PLA2R BCR-expressing Nalm-6 cells were selectively depleted by PLA2R-CAARTs, demonstrating antigen-specific cytolytic activity and engraftment. C17-CAART exhibited slightly greater in vivo cytotoxicity than C178-CAART, consistent with in vitro potency. In addition to cytolytic activity, we evaluated in vivo persistence by measuring the frequency of CAAR+ T-cells in lymphoid tissues at the time of tissue harvest (Figure 4D). While both C17- and C178-CAARTs were detectable in the bone marrow and spleen, only C17-CAART exhibited a significantly higher frequency of engrafted CAAR+ cells compared to the non-CAAR-transduced CART19 control, suggesting enhanced persistence or surface stability of the CAAR in vivo. PLA2R-CAART was not evaluated in the context of endogenous anti-PLA2R B-cells producing anti-PLA2R antibodies, which is a limitation of this study and could be investigated in future experiments.

To validate the function of PLA2R-CAART against primary samples from PLA2R MN patients, we quantitated the ability of PLA2R-CAAR to immunoadsorb anti-PLA2R autoantibodies from PLA2R MN patient plasma samples. C17- and C178-CAART demonstrated comparable levels of immunoadsorption of anti-PLA2R immunoreactivity relative to NTD cells (Figure 5A). The comparable immunoadsorption profiles suggest that CTLD8-reactive antibodies do not comprise a substantial portion of total anti-PLA2R antibodies within each patient, consistent with prior studies that did not identify substantial anti-CTLD8 epitope reactivity in PLA2R MN sera15,16,20. To validate the ability of PLA2R-CAARTs to kill primary anti-PLA2R B-cells, the intended target cells in PLA2R MN patients, we performed an ELISpot in vitro killing assay (Figure 5C–D). Anti-PLA2R B-cells in patients were rare, ranging from 0.08%–0.54% (median 0.32%), limiting the ability to detect a change in most patients. However, C17-CAART, slightly more so than C178-CAART, induced specific cytolysis of primary anti-PLA2R B-cells from MN patients, providing direct evidence of their therapeutic potential.

To evaluate for potential off-target cytotoxic activity, we performed comprehensive pathologic analysis of CAART-treated mice and high-throughput screening of a human membrane proteome array, which revealed no off-target interactions for either C17- or C178-CAART. The CysR domain of PLA2R binds chondroitin-4-sulfate proteoglycans, such as those expressed on proteins such as CD45, although no binding to CD45 was detected in our screens. The CysR domain also binds sulfated oligosaccharides, which could theoretically modify the bioavailability of proteins such as thyroid stimulating hormone, lutropin, or human gonadotropin; therefore these hormone levels would need to be monitored after PLA2R-CAART infusion for possible clinical effects.

Of note, DSG3-CAART for desmoglein 3-positive mucosal pemphigus vulgaris and MuSK-CAART for muscle-specific tyrosine kinase myasthenia gravis have been evaluated in phase 1 clinical trials (NCT04422912, NCT05451212). The DSG3-CAART study was completed and reported a lack of consistent improvement in clinical or serologic outcomes27, and the MuSK-CAART study is currently paused due to inconsistent safety and efficacy signals28 (Volkov et al, ESGCT 2024); pemphigus vulgaris and myasthenia gravis are now being evaluated in clinical trials of anti-CD19 CART therapy (NCT063590041 and NCT04422912). Nevertheless, our study presents the development of novel PLA2R-CAART designs as a potential precision therapeutic approach for PLA2R MN.

Supplementary Material

1
2

Translational Statement.

Our findings support the preliminary feasibility of PLA2R-targeted CAAR T-cells as an antigen-specific treatment for membranous nephropathy, for the goal of eliminating pathogenic B-cells without compromising overall immunity.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Lawrence Beck and Gary Cummings for helpful discussions, Tony Secreto and Joshua Glover at the University of Pennsylvania Stem Cell and Xenograft Core for assistance with in vivo experiments, and Integral Molecular for their work on the human membrane proteome array.

Funding

This work was supported in part by a sponsored research agreement from Cabaletta Bio and research funds from Columbia University Irving Medical Center to ASP, and research funds from University of Pennsylavnia to SIG. ER is supported in part by the Abramson Cancer Center Support Grant NIH/NCI P30–016520. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Footnotes

Disclosure Statements

BA, GZ, XM, SMV, EEG, EW, ER: none

BW: current employee of Legend Biotech

ACB: current employee of Vetigenics

SIG: patent licensing, Cabaletta Bio

DRP: current employee of COUR Pharma

ECT, SW, JJH: current employee of Cabaletta Bio, which has licensed technology relating to this report

ASP: Cabaletta Bio (co-founder with equity, payments, research funding, patent licensing); Janssen, Sanofi, Bristol Myers Squibb, Avilar Therapeutics (consulting)

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Data sharing statement

All data are presented in the article. There are no underlying codes that were used for data generation.

References

  • 1.Qin W et al. Anti-Phospholipase A2 Receptor Antibody in Membranous Nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 22, 1137–1143 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hofstra JM, Beck LH, Beck DM, Wetzels JF & Salant DJ Anti-phospholipase A2 receptor antibodies correlate with clinical status in idiopathic membranous nephropathy. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 6, 1286–1291 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Beck LH et al. M-type phospholipase A2 receptor as target antigen in idiopathic membranous nephropathy. N Engl J Med 361, 11–21 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Reinhard L et al. Pathogenicity of Human Anti-PLA 2 R1 Antibodies in Minipigs: A Pilot Study. J Am Soc Nephrol 34, 369–373 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ruggenenti P et al. Rituximab in idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a one-year prospective study. J Am Soc Nephrol 14, 1851–1857 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fervenza FC et al. Rituximab treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy. Kidney International 73, 117–125 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Peng J-J et al. Chimeric autoantibody receptor T cells clonally eliminate B cells producing autoantibodies against IFN-γ. Science Immunology 10, eadm8186 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Meng H et al. La/SSB chimeric autoantibody receptor modified NK92MI cells for targeted therapy of autoimmune disease. Clin Immunol 192, 40–49 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Seifert L et al. An antigen-specific chimeric autoantibody receptor (CAAR) NK cell strategy for the elimination of anti-PLA2R1 and anti-THSD7A antibody-secreting cells. Kidney International 105, 886–889 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ellebrecht CT et al. Reengineering chimeric antigen receptor T cells for targeted therapy of autoimmune disease. Science 353, 179–184 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Oh S et al. Precision targeting of autoantigen-specific B cells in muscle-specific tyrosine kinase myasthenia gravis with chimeric autoantibody receptor T cells. Nat Biotechnol 41, 1229–1238 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Oh S, Khani-Habibabadi F, O’Connor KC & Payne AS Composition and function of AChR chimeric autoantibody receptor T cells for antigen-specific B cell depletion in myasthenia gravis. Sci Adv 11, eadt0795 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Reincke SM et al. Chimeric autoantibody receptor T cells deplete NMDA receptor-specific B cells. Cell 186, 5084–5097.e18 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lee J et al. Antigen-specific B cell depletion for precision therapy of mucosal pemphigus vulgaris. https://www.jci.org/articles/view/138416/sd/1 (2020) doi: 10.1172/JCI138416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Fresquet M et al. Identification of a major epitope recognized by PLA2R autoantibodies in primary membranous nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 26, 302–313 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Seitz-Polski B et al. Epitope Spreading of Autoantibody Response to PLA2R Associates with Poor Prognosis in Membranous Nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 27, 1517–1533 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Seitz-Polski B et al. Phospholipase A2 Receptor 1 Epitope Spreading at Baseline Predicts Reduced Likelihood of Remission of Membranous Nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 29, 401–408 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kao L, Lam V, Waldman M, Glassock RJ & Zhu Q Identification of the immunodominant epitope region in phospholipase A2 receptor-mediating autoantibody binding in idiopathic membranous nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 26, 291–301 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Choudhuri K, Wiseman D, Brown MH, Gould K & van der Merwe PA T-cell receptor triggering is critically dependent on the dimensions of its peptide-MHC ligand. Nature 436, 578–582 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Reinhard L et al. Clinical Relevance of Domain-Specific Phospholipase A2 Receptor 1 Antibody Levels in Patients with Membranous Nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 31, 197–207 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Huang B et al. Phospholipase A2 Receptor Autoantibodies as a Novel Serological Biomarker for Autoimmune Thyroid Disease Associated Nephropathy. Front. Immunol . 11, (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhang Q et al. Ultrasensitive Quantitation of Anti-Phospholipase A2 Receptor Antibody as A Diagnostic and Prognostic Indicator of Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy. Sci Rep 7, 12049 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cheng Y, Wang M, Wang J, Cui Z & Zhao M The characters of antibodies against PLA2R in healthy individuals and in the patient with PLA2R associated membranous nephropathy. European Journal of Medical Research 28, 128 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rinschen MM et al. A Multi-layered Quantitative In Vivo Expression Atlas of the Podocyte Unravels Kidney Disease Candidate Genes. Cell Rep 23, 2495–2508 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Meyer-Schwesinger C et al. A novel mouse model of phospholipase A2 receptor 1-associated membranous nephropathy mimics podocyte injury in patients. Kidney Int 97, 913–919 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tomas NM et al. Podocyte expression of human phospholipase A2 receptor 1 causes immune-mediated membranous nephropathy in mice. Kidney Int 103, 297–303 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Volkov JR et al. Correlative findings following DSG3-CAART infusion with & without combination preconditioning therapy in patients with Pemphigus Vulgaris (DesCAARTes study). Hum Gene Ther 36, e138. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Volkov JR et al. Clinical and translational findings following MuSK-CAART infusion without preconditioning in patients with myasthenia gravis (MuSCAARTes™ trial). Hum Gene Ther 36, e451. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1
2

Data Availability Statement

All data are presented in the article. There are no underlying codes that were used for data generation.

RESOURCES