Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1995 Nov;69(5):1633–1656. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80038-X

A novel theoretical approach to the analysis of dendritic transients.

H Agmon-Snir 1
PMCID: PMC1236398  PMID: 8580308

Abstract

A novel theoretical framework for analyzing dendritic transients is introduced. This approach, called the method of moments, is an extension of Rall's cable theory for dendrites. It provides analytic investigation of voltage attenuation, signal delay, and synchronization problems in passive dendritic trees. In this method, the various moments of a transient signal are used to characterize the properties of the transient. The strength of the signal is measured by the time integral of the signal, its characteristic time is determined by its centroid ("center of gravity"), and the width of the signal is determined by a measure similar to the standard deviation in probability theory. Using these signal properties, the method of moments provides theorems, expressions, and efficient algorithms for analyzing the voltage response in arbitrary passive trees. The method yields new insights into spatiotemporal integration, coincidence detection mechanisms, and the properties of local interactions between synaptic inputs in dendritic trees. The method can also be used for matching dendritic neuron models to experimental data and for the analysis of synaptic inputs recorded experimentally.

Full text

PDF
1633

Images in this article

1634FIGURE 1
on p.1634
1636FIGURE 2
on p.1636
1640FIGURE 3
on p.1640
1643FIGURE 5
on p.1643
1644FIGURE 6
on p.1644
1644FIGURE 7
on p.1644
1649FIGURE 8
on p.1649
1652FIGURE 10
on p.1652

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abbott L. F., Farhi E., Gutmann S. The path integral for dendritic trees. Biol Cybern. 1991;66(1):49–60. doi: 10.1007/BF00196452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Agmon-Snir H., Segev I. Signal delay and input synchronization in passive dendritic structures. J Neurophysiol. 1993 Nov;70(5):2066–2085. doi: 10.1152/jn.1993.70.5.2066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barrett J. N., Crill W. E. Influence of dendritic location and membrane properties on the effectiveness of synapses on cat motoneurones. J Physiol. 1974 Jun;239(2):325–345. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown T. H., Fricke R. A., Perkel D. H. Passive electrical constants in three classes of hippocampal neurons. J Neurophysiol. 1981 Oct;46(4):812–827. doi: 10.1152/jn.1981.46.4.812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Butz E. G., Cowan J. D. Transient potentials in dendritic systems of arbitrary geometry. Biophys J. 1974 Sep;14(9):661–689. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(74)85943-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cao B. J., Abbott L. F. A new computational method for cable theory problems. Biophys J. 1993 Feb;64(2):303–313. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81370-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Carnevale N. T., Johnston D. Electrophysiological characterization of remote chemical synapses. J Neurophysiol. 1982 Apr;47(4):606–621. doi: 10.1152/jn.1982.47.4.606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Clements J. D., Redman S. J. Cable properties of cat spinal motoneurones measured by combining voltage clamp, current clamp and intracellular staining. J Physiol. 1989 Feb;409:63–87. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1989.sp017485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Durand D. The somatic shunt cable model for neurons. Biophys J. 1984 Nov;46(5):645–653. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(84)84063-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fleshman J. W., Segev I., Burke R. B. Electrotonic architecture of type-identified alpha-motoneurons in the cat spinal cord. J Neurophysiol. 1988 Jul;60(1):60–85. doi: 10.1152/jn.1988.60.1.60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hines M. A program for simulation of nerve equations with branching geometries. Int J Biomed Comput. 1989 Mar;24(1):55–68. doi: 10.1016/0020-7101(89)90007-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Holmes W. R. A continuous cable method for determining the transient potential in passive dendritic trees of known geometry. Biol Cybern. 1986;55(2-3):115–124. doi: 10.1007/BF00341927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Horwitz B. An analytical method for investigating transient potentials in neurons with branching dendritic trees. Biophys J. 1981 Oct;36(1):155–192. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(81)84722-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jack J. J., Redman S. J. An electrical description of the motoneurone, and its application to the analysis of synaptic potentials. J Physiol. 1971 Jun;215(2):321–352. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kawato M. Cable properties of a neuron model with non-uniform membrane resistivity. J Theor Biol. 1984 Nov 7;111(1):149–169. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(84)80202-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kirkwood P. A. On the use and interpretation of cross-correlations measurements in the mammalian central nervous system. J Neurosci Methods. 1979 Aug;1(2):107–132. doi: 10.1016/0165-0270(79)90009-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Koch C. Cable theory in neurons with active, linearized membranes. Biol Cybern. 1984;50(1):15–33. doi: 10.1007/BF00317936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Koch C., Poggio T. A simple algorithm for solving the cable equation in dendritic trees of arbitrary geometry. J Neurosci Methods. 1985 Feb;12(4):303–315. doi: 10.1016/0165-0270(85)90015-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Koch C., Poggio T., Torre V. Retinal ganglion cells: a functional interpretation of dendritic morphology. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1982 Jul 27;298(1090):227–263. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1982.0084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Major G., Evans J. D., Jack J. J. Solutions for transients in arbitrarily branching cables: I. Voltage recording with a somatic shunt. Biophys J. 1993 Jul;65(1):423–449. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81037-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Major G., Larkman A. U., Jonas P., Sakmann B., Jack J. J. Detailed passive cable models of whole-cell recorded CA3 pyramidal neurons in rat hippocampal slices. J Neurosci. 1994 Aug;14(8):4613–4638. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-08-04613.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Nicoll A., Larkman A., Blakemore C. Modulation of EPSP shape and efficacy by intrinsic membrane conductances in rat neocortical pyramidal neurons in vitro. J Physiol. 1993 Aug;468:693–710. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Nitzan R., Segev I., Yarom Y. Voltage behavior along the irregular dendritic structure of morphologically and physiologically characterized vagal motoneurons in the guinea pig. J Neurophysiol. 1990 Feb;63(2):333–346. doi: 10.1152/jn.1990.63.2.333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. RALL W. Branching dendritic trees and motoneuron membrane resistivity. Exp Neurol. 1959 Nov;1:491–527. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(59)90046-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. RALL W. Electrophysiology of a dendritic neuron model. Biophys J. 1962 Mar;2(2 Pt 2):145–167. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3495(62)86953-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. RALL W. Membrane potential transients and membrane time constant of motoneurons. Exp Neurol. 1960 Oct;2:503–532. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(60)90029-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. RALL W. Theory of physiological properties of dendrites. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1962 Mar 2;96:1071–1092. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1962.tb54120.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Rall W., Burke R. E., Holmes W. R., Jack J. J., Redman S. J., Segev I. Matching dendritic neuron models to experimental data. Physiol Rev. 1992 Oct;72(4 Suppl):S159–S186. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1992.72.suppl_4.S159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Rall W., Burke R. E., Smith T. G., Nelson P. G., Frank K. Dendritic location of synapses and possible mechanisms for the monosynaptic EPSP in motoneurons. J Neurophysiol. 1967 Sep;30(5):1169–1193. doi: 10.1152/jn.1967.30.5.1169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Rall W. Distinguishing theoretical synaptic potentials computed for different soma-dendritic distributions of synaptic input. J Neurophysiol. 1967 Sep;30(5):1138–1168. doi: 10.1152/jn.1967.30.5.1138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Rall W., Rinzel J. Branch input resistance and steady attenuation for input to one branch of a dendritic neuron model. Biophys J. 1973 Jul;13(7):648–687. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(73)86014-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Rall W. Time constants and electrotonic length of membrane cylinders and neurons. Biophys J. 1969 Dec;9(12):1483–1508. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(69)86467-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Rapp M., Segev I., Yarom Y. Physiology, morphology and detailed passive models of guinea-pig cerebellar Purkinje cells. J Physiol. 1994 Jan 1;474(1):101–118. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1994.sp020006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Redman S. J. The attenuation of passively propagating dendritic potentials in a motoneurone cable model. J Physiol. 1973 Nov;234(3):637–664. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Regehr W. G., Armstrong C. M. Dendritic function. Where does it all begin? Curr Biol. 1994 May 1;4(5):436–439. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00096-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Rinzel J., Rall W. Transient response in a dendritic neuron model for current injected at one branch. Biophys J. 1974 Oct;14(10):759–790. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(74)85948-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Segev I. Single neurone models: oversimple, complex and reduced. Trends Neurosci. 1992 Nov;15(11):414–421. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(92)90003-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Softky W. Sub-millisecond coincidence detection in active dendritic trees. Neuroscience. 1994 Jan;58(1):13–41. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(94)90154-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Stevens C. F. Neuronal communication. Cooperativity of unreliable neurons. Curr Biol. 1994 Mar 1;4(3):268–269. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00062-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Whitehead R. R., Rosenberg J. R. On trees as equivalent cables. Proc Biol Sci. 1993 May 22;252(1334):103–108. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1993.0052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Zador A. M., Agmon-Snir H., Segev I. The morphoelectrotonic transform: a graphical approach to dendritic function. J Neurosci. 1995 Mar;15(3 Pt 1):1669–1682. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-03-01669.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES