Skip to main content
. 2001 Jul 30;69(3):601–614. doi: 10.1086/323037

Table 5.

Power Comparisons of the Three Tests (QSAT, TDTMK, and TDTVC) in Simulations based on Empirical Population Genetics Data, under the Random Sampling Scheme[Note]

Power
P=.05
 P=.01
TDTMK
 TDTVC
 TDTMK
 TDTVC
Status of High-RiskAllele, Trait Distribution,and Model QSAT n/3 2n/3 n n/3 2n/3 n QSAT n/3 2n/3 n n/3 2n/3 n
Fixed:
 Normal:
  Dominant .98 .53 .77 .86 .31 .55 .64 .97 .31 .61 .77 .16 .37 .50
  Additive .98 .44 .74 .87 .30 .54 .65 .96 .20 .55 .74 .13 .39 .50
  Recessive .91 .32 .55 .65 .23 .43 .53 .85 .14 .35 .50 .10 .29 .37
 Log-normal:
  Dominant .97 .60 .78 .86 .32 .54 .64 .94 .43 .67 .79 .18 .38 .48
  Additive .96 .61 .79 .90 .36 .57 .66 .90 .39 .64 .80 .21 .40 .53
  Recessive .90 .40 .57 .66 .26 .47 .54 .83 .21 .42 .53 .13 .32 .43
Random:
 Normal:
  Dominant .90 .31 .43 .54 .20 .38 .48 .81 .17 .27 .39 .09 .22 .34
  Additive .91 .48 .65 .80 .29 .53 .64 .82 .26 .44 .64 .16 .34 .50
  Recessive .96 .60 .75 .84 .33 .55 .64 .93 .41 .61 .75 .19 .38 .48
 Log-normal:
  Dominant .86 .30 .47 .55 .19 .43 .48 .78 .20 .32 .42 .14 .28 .35
  Additive .88 .46 .72 .80 .25 .50 .63 .80 .24 .54 .69 .15 .37 .48
  Recessive .93 .58 .77 .85 .30 .55 .64 .90 .39 .64 .77 .17 .40 .50

Note.— Sample size is n=150 for the QSAT and 50, 100, and 150 for TDT tests.