Abstract
Background
Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is a zoonotic pathogen mainly transmitted through contaminated food or water in sub-Saharan countries, highlighting the need for environmental surveillance. This study aimed to assess the burden and molecular characterization of HEV in environmental wastewater.
Method
A community-based surveillance was conducted in Yaoundé, Cameroon, using untreated wastewater samples collected monthly from January to December 2023 from hospitals, residential sewage systems, markets, and plant watering points. Molecular phylogeny was performed on sequences from the Open Reading Frame 1 region.
Results
HEV was detected in 26.4% (19/72) of all sites, with prevalence ranging from 8.3% (1/12) in hospitals to 41.7% (5/12) in residential areas (p = 0.0022). Of the 19 positives, HEV detection was highest in specific residential areas (26.3%) and plant watering points (15.8%). Detection rates were significantly higher during the short dry season (36.8%) and long dry season (31.6%) compared to the short-wet season (21.05%) and long-wet season (10.53%) (p = 0.034). Phylogenetic analysis of the sequenced samples revealed that the detected HEV strains are closely related to Orthohepevirus C genotype C1 previously associated with rodents rather than to the classical human HEV genotypes. This finding raises important questions about possible zoonotic transmission in densely populated urban areas.
Conclusion
This is the first study to report HEV detection and genetic analysis in wastewater from the Mfoundi Division of Yaoundé, and only the second such report in Cameroon. The presence of HEV in community wastewater, especially from residential and irrigation sites, suggests widespread circulation and potential environmental and foodborne risks. The identification of HEV-C1-like strains highlights the possible role of rodents in transmission. These findings emphasize the importance of integrating wastewater surveillance into public health strategies and call for further research on zoonotic sources through a One Health lens.
Introduction
The enteric zoonotic pathogen known as the hepatitis E virus (HEV) can cause either acute or chronic viral hepatitis in humans. It is primally transmitted through contaminated water and contaminated food, or by direct contact with infected animals [1–4]. Poor sanitation in developing countries frequently contaminates water supplies with waste [5–7]. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that there are approximately 20 million cases of HEV annually, leading to more than 44,000 deaths and 3,000 stillbirths globally [8].
The hepatitis E virus (HEV) is a non-enveloped, single-stranded, positive-sense RNA virus belonging to the Hepeviridae family, and the Paslahepevirus genus. Its genome is approximately 7.2 kilobases (kb) in length and comprises three open reading frames (ORFs). ORF1 encodes non-structural proteins involved in viral replication, ORF2 encodes the viral capsid protein, and ORF3 encodes a small multifunctional protein associated with virus egress and host interaction [9–11]. Among the eight identified HEV genotypes (HEV-1 to HEV-8), five (HEV-1, HEV-2, HEV-3, HEV-4 and HEV-7) are known to infect humans. HEV genotype 3 (HEV-3) is zoonotic and widely distributed among both humans and animals, particularly in developed and transitional countries. The primary animal hosts of HEV-3 include pigs, rabbits, deer, and mongooses. HEV-3 is further subdivided into multiple subtypes (e.g., 3a to 3j) based on phylogenetic differences. Similarly, HEV genotype 4 (HEV-4) infects both humans and pigs. Genotypes 3, 4, and 7 exhibit zoonotic potential. Genotypes 5 and 6 have been identified in wild boars, while genotypes 7 and 8 have recently been isolated from camelids and dromedaries [9,11].
The distribution of HEV varies globally. HEV-1 is mainly found in South and Central Asia and North Africa, while HEV-2 is primarily found in Central America and West Africa. HEV-3 is widespread, and HEV-4 is mainly found in Asia and Europe. HEV-1 and HEV-2 are associated with high mortality rates, particularly during the third trimester of pregnancy, and can increase the risk of acute liver failure. In contrast, HEV-3 and HEV-4 are more prevalent in industrialized countries and can cause persistent infections in immunocompromised individuals, which may subsequently lead to accelerated progression toward liver cirrhosis. The primary modes of virus transmission are through contact with infected animals or through consumption of infected animal products or contaminated food and drink [12–16].
HEV spreads through the faecal-oral route. In less developed countries, it is commonly considered a waterborne disease, as it is often transmitted through contaminated water due to poor sanitation. However, in more developed countries, it can also be contracted by eating undercooked, contaminated meat, particularly pork [3,14,17,18]. The presence of HEV in drinking and irrigation water is a growing public health concern, as it can contaminate these vital resources. HEV has been detected in wastewater samples from several countries [16]. Previous studies have identified genotypes 1, 3, and 4 in humans and pigs, establishing Cameroon as an endemic country for HEV [19–21]. However, there is limited information on the prevalence and diversity of HEV in Cameroonian wastewater. Currently, only preliminary data is available on HEV in environmental sewage is available from the northern region, where HEV genotype 3, subtype 3a, has been detected [19]. Our aim is to evaluate the prevalence and molecular characteristics of circulating HEV strains in environmental wastewater in Yaoundé, Cameroon, by analyzing wastewater samples collected from various sites, including hospitals, markets, residential areas and irrigation systems.
Materials and methods
Study sites
This research was carried out in Yaoundé, the capital city of Cameroon, located in the Mfoundi department of the central region as described in our recent article [22]. The city covers an area of about 256 km² and is situated between latitudes 4°45’N and 4°00’N, and longitudes 11°20’E and 11°40’E. Yaoundé has a tropical climate with two main seasons: dry and wet. The city experiences a long dry season from December to February, followed by a shorter one in July and August. The rainy periods are split into two: from March to June and again from September to November. This pattern of alternating dry and wet seasons is typical of the region.
Inclusivity in global research
As a national reference laboratory for emerging and re-emerging epidemic preparedness and response, our work focuses on supporting public health efforts (S1 file). No permits were required to access the field sites.
Sampling and concentration
Untreated wastewater samples were collected monthly from various locations, including the hospital (CHUY_university hospital center), residential sewage systems (BONAS, PAPOSY, Biyem Assi, Mvog Ada), and factory water points (Diderot) [22]. The samples were taken early in the morning, between 6:00 and 6:30, using sterile tubes that were kept at temperatures between 4°C and 8°C and transported to the laboratory within six hours. In the laboratory, the samples were concentrated using the polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation method as described by Greening et al. in 2022 and modified by Fatawou et al. in 2023 [19,23]. Briefly, 500 mL of wastewater was pre-treated by centrifugation at 1,940 g and 4 °C for 30 minutes to minimise the presence of PCR inhibitors. The resulting supernatant was then chemically treated using a 1 mol/L NaOH solution. Next, a mixture of 39.5 mL of 22% dextran, 287 mL of 29% PEG 6000, and 35 mL of 5 M NaCl solution was added. The resulting pellet was treated with chloroform to obtain a clear sample, and Gentamicin 100 mg/mL reduce bacterial contamination.
Molecular detection and characterization of HEV
Total DNA/RNA was extracted from 200 µL of concentrated wastewater using a commercial purification kit with an inhibitor removal spin column (DaAnGene®), following the manufacturer’s instructions. 50 μL of elution buffer was used to elute the isolated nucleic acids, which were then kept at −80°C for additional analysis. The partial HEV ORF1 (Open Reading Frame 1) gene fragment (440 bp) was amplified using a heminested PCR-based assay, as previously described [4]. The extracted nucleic acid was reverse transcribed into cDNA using 10 µL of RNA and random hexamers, with the RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. First and second-round PCR was performed using the HotStarTaq PCR kit (QIAGEN, Germany) and denatured primers DE-F4228 (ACYTTYTGTGCYYTITTT GGTCCITGGTT), DE-R4598 (CCGGGTTCRCCIGAGTGTTTCTTCCA), and DE-R4565 (GCCATGTTCCAGAYGGTGTTCCA) [24]. Gel electrophoresis on 1% agarose gels was used to separate the PCR products. Amplicons of approximately 440 bp from the second round of PCR were considered positive.
HEV Genotyping
HEV genotyping was performed by comparing Cameroonian samples with strains from other geographic regions available in GenBank, using sequencing and phylogenetic analysis.
Phylogenetic trees were constructed using the neighbor-joining method and the Kimura two-parameter model in the MEGA 10 software, based on the nucleotide sequences of the amplified gene. Sequencing was conducted using the 3730XL DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). To ensure the accuracy of the phylogenetic tree analysis, bootstrap resampling was performed 1,000 times. The sequences obtained for this study were uploaded to GenBank with accession numbers PP764563 to PP764569.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 25.0 software. Qualitative variables were presented as frequencies, and the chi-square test was used to compare proportions, with a significance level set at p values <0.05”.
Results
HEV detection
A total of 72 wastewater samples were collected from January to December 2023. These included 12 samples from the CHUY_ university hospital center, 12 from the Diderot factory, 12 from the Mvog Ada market, and 36 from three residential wastewater treatment systems in the Mfoundi department (Bonas, Paposy, and Biyem Assi), with 12 samples taken from each site.
As shown in Table 1, HEV was detected in 26.4% (19 out of 72) of wastewater samples. Notably, HEV was identified in samples from all six study locations. The highest detection rates were observed in Bonas and Paposy, at 41.7% (05 out of 12 samples each), while the lowest rate was recorded in CHUY at 8.4% (one out of 12 samples). Biyem Assi and Diderot showed detection rates of 25% (03 out of 12 samples), while Mvog Ada’s rate was 16.7% (two out of 12 samples).
Table 1. Summary of hepatitis E virus detection at each collection site.
| Sites | N tested | N detected | % of detection |
|---|---|---|---|
| Biyem Assi | 12 | 3 | 25 |
| Bonas | 12 | 5 | 41.7 |
| CHUY | 12 | 1 | 8.4 |
| Diderot | 12 | 3 | 25 |
| Mvogada | 12 | 2 | 16.7 |
| Paposy | 12 | 5 | 41.7 |
| Total | 72 | 19 | 26.4 |
N=Total number of samples, %= percentage.
Detection rates varied by source type. HEV was detected significantly more frequently in wastewater from residential areas than in wastewater from other sites (p = 0.0022), followed by wastewater from markets and then from hospitals. Specifically, HEV was found in wastewater from the CHUY hospital at a rate of 8.4% (1/12), from the Mvog Ada market at 16.7% (2/12) and from the Diderot plant watering point at 25% (3/12). In contrast, residential wastewater showed higher positivity rates: 25% (3/12) in Biyem Assi and 41.7% (5/12) in both Paposy and Bonas.
In this study, 52.6% (10/19) of the HEV-detectable samples exhibited a robust signal under UV illumination after electrophoresis, suggesting a higher concentration of HEV RNA. The signal intensity was assessed visually on the gel and scored on a scale from 1 to 3, where 1 indicates the weakest signal and 3 indicates the strongest. Of the samples that tested strongly positive, 30% (3/10) were from BONAS, 10% (1/10) from CHUY, 20% (2/10) from DIDEROT, 30% (3/10) from PAPOSY and 10% (1/10) from BIYEMASSI. The HEV signal detections were found at the plant watering point and in effluent from domestic sewage systems.
Seasonal distribution of HEV
The selected sites were monitored for a full year (January to December) to determine whether seasonal factors influenced the significant variation in HEV detection in wastewater. This study observed seasonal differences in HEV distribution. The highest HEV detection rates overall were recorded during the short and long dry seasons, at 36.8% (7/19) and 31.6% (6/19), respectively. By contrast, the long-wet season had a detection rate of 21.05% (4/19), while the extended wet season had the lowest rate at 10.53% (2/19) (p = 0.034). Notably, effluent from BONAS consistently showed the highest HEV detection across all seasons (Fig. 1).
Fig 1. Seasonal prevalence of HIV among sampling areas.
Phylogenetic analysis
The results of the phylogenetic analysis are shown in Fig 2. Out of the 10 positive samples with strong HEV RNA signals detected by nested RT-PCR, only seven (70%) produced good sequencing results. The nucleotide sequences of these seven HEV strains have been uploaded to GenBank and can be accessed using the following accession numbers: PP764563 to PP764569 (S2 table). This study involved conducting a phylogenetic analysis of HEV strains identified in various types of wastewater in the Centre Region of Cameroon, specifically in Yaoundé. This analysis compared a highly conserved 440 bp region of ORF1 with HEV strains from different geographical areas that were available in GenBank. Phylogenetic analysis of the seven sequences indicated that they all clustered with HEV-3.
Fig 2. Phylogenetic tree based on a fragment of the ORF1 region of GenBank sequences.
Only bootstrap values greater than 70% are shown. For each GenBank HEV strain included in the phylogenetic analysis, the accession number, host, genotype/subtype, and country of origin are provided. The strains identified in this study are outlined with a red circle and indicated by their accession number.
Discussion
This is the second report of the detection of the hepatitis E virus (HEV) genome in environmental wastewater samples in Cameroon. HEV was first detected and characterized in sewage environmental samples of the North Region in 2023 [19]. This study presents the first report on the detection and characterization of HEV in wastewater from the Mfoundi Division in Cameroon’s Centre Region. The present study provides information on the circulation of HEV in the untreated wastewater of a hospital (CHUY), a residential area (Bonas, Paposy, Biyem Assi), a market (Mvog Ada) and a plant watering point (Diderot).
In the current work, HEV was detected in all six of the selected sites with an overall detection rate of 26.4% and the detection rates of 5.3%, 10.5%, 15.8% and 26.3% for CHUY, Mvog Ada, Biyem Assi and Paposy, respectively. Consistent with other studies, we observed a higher prevalence of HEV in various types of untreated wastewater in the Mfoundi Division. Our results suggest widespread circulation of HEV in Yaoundé communities in Cameroon. Our findings are consistent with data reported in many other studies [15,16,25–27]. Notably, a high HEV detection rate was observed in wastewater from residential systems, as we found, 68% (13/19) of the samples tested positive. This observation highlights that the presence of HEV in the environment resulting from viral excretion by infected individuals may contribute to exposure risk in Cameroon. It suggests that untreated wastewater can serve as a useful tool for monitoring HEV and other enteric pathogens within the community, even during non-epidemic periods.
This study detected varying degrees of HEV RNA in different geographic locations of sample sites. The present study found that wastewater from residential systems had the highest HEV detection rate, with a global detection rate above 70%. This may be due to the large number of people, the type of residence, poor hygiene conditions and a lack of a potable water supply, as well as population density. These findings suggest that overcrowding and poor sanitation increase the risk of HEV transmission through contaminated wastewater [1,28].
It is well known that surface waters from different sources are commonly used as crop irrigation sources worldwide, which could cause HEV contamination of irrigated crops [18,29]. In the present study, HEV RNA was detected at high levels in wastewater used for irrigation (Diderot) in the Mfoundi Division. The detection of HEV in irrigation water sources and plant samples should raise concerns for the public health system and local health authorities. Our result reveals a possible foodborne transmission through crops in this area and the wide distribution of HEV RNA in Diderot strengthens the importance of HEV environmental surveillance in Cameroon. Importantly, simple and low-cost measures can be implemented to reduce the risk of infection for communities in Cameroon.
Seasonal pattern of HEV positivity was described in the literature [25,30–34] but much less is known about seasonal influences of HEV distribution in Africa, and specifically in the countries with equatorial climate seasons. In this study, a seasonal pattern of HEV RNA positivity was observed in sewage samples collected over the course of a year in the Mfoundi Division, Yaoundé, Cameroon. A high detection rate of HEV RNA was observed at all collection sites during the short (36.8%) and long (31.6%) dry seasons, while a lower positivity rate was found during the long-wet season. These findings are consistent with previous studies on HEV detection in environmental water, providing evidence that changes in climate conditions are linked to the rate of viral particle detection in environmental waters in Cameroon. [25,33]. This finding could be related to the fact that a reduction of water flow level may increase viral contamination when feces are discharged into the river. By contrast, our findings were markedly different from those reported in the Central African Republic where HEV was highly detected during rainfall season or flood in human samples from Bangui [34].
Our phylogenetic analysis of viral sequences from wastewater samples collected in Yaoundé revealed a clearly defined monophyletic cluster, suggesting that the viruses are genetically very similar. This points to the local circulation of a single variant or a group of closely related hepatitis E virus (HEV) strains. The clustering pattern aligns with what has been seen in other studies from low-sanitation environments, where wastewater reflects population-level virus circulation [35,36]. What stands out in our findings is that these sequences are more closely related to viruses from the Orthohepevirus C group particularly genotype C1 than to the classical human HEV genotypes (HEV-1 to HEV-4) [37]. Orthohepevirus C is typically associated with rodents and was, until recently, though not to infect humans. But that view has changed. A few recent studies from Europe have reported confirmed cases of human infection with HEV-C1, including in patients with acute hepatitis and weakened immune systems [38,39]. These cases suggest that this rodent-associated virus may be crossing into human populations more often than previously thought, and could be an emerging zoonotic threat.
Detecting HEV-C1-like sequences in wastewater from an urban setting like Yaoundé raises important public health questions. It’s not yet clear whether these viruses are coming from infected people or from rodent populations shedding the virus into the environment. Either way, it highlights the need for stronger surveillance especially in crowded cities where contact with contaminated water or rodent reservoirs is more likely. Given these findings, there’s a clear need to: carry out full-genome sequencing to confirm exactly which virus is circulating, explore possible animal reservoirs, particularly rodents in urban areas, and include environmental data like this in One Health strategies that link human, animal, and environmental health.
Our study has some limitations. The sample size was relatively small, and half of the sampling sites were residential areas, which might not fully represent the city’s wastewater landscape. Still, even with these constraints, our data show that wastewater can be a powerful tool for tracking enteric viruses in the population and can offer early warning signals about potential outbreaks.
We also emphasize the need for further research, particularly involving comparative sequence analysis between HEV strains detected in wastewater and those from both human and animal origins especially local swine populations. Such investigations would be crucial to elucidate the role of zoonotic transmission and to deepen our understanding of the molecular epidemiology and transmission dynamics of HEV in the region.
Conclusion
This study provides the first evidence of hepatitis E virus (HEV) detection and genetic characterization in wastewater from the Mfoundi Division in Yaoundé, Cameroon, and marks only the second report of environmental HEV in the country. HEV RNA was found in all six sampled sites, with particularly high detection rates in wastewater from residential areas and irrigation sources. These findings suggest that HEV is circulating widely in the community and that wastewater may be an important route of environmental exposure especially in areas with poor sanitation, overcrowding, and limited access to clean water. The presence of HEV RNA in irrigation water is particularly concerning, as it raises the possibility of foodborne transmission through contaminated crops. This reinforces the importance of environmental monitoring, even outside known outbreaks, as a way to detect early warning signs of viral spread in the population. Interestingly, our genetic analysis showed that the detected sequences are more closely related to Orthohepevirus C (genotype C1), which is typically found in rodents. This raises important public health questions about possible zoonotic transmission, particularly in urban settings where humans and rodents live in close proximity. Though traditionally considered non-infectious to humans, HEV-C1 has recently been linked to cases of hepatitis in Europe, suggesting it may be an emerging threat. While our study is limited by the number and type of sites sampled, it clearly demonstrates the value of wastewater surveillance in tracking the spread of enteric viruses like HEV. Going forward, more extensive sampling and genome sequencing will be needed to confirm the viral sources and clarify whether transmission involves animal reservoirs especially local rodent and swine populations. These efforts will be key to understanding how HEV circulates in Cameroon and to designing effective public health responses grounded in a One Health approach.
The findings highlight new challenges in managing and protecting watersheds, given the potential for fecal contamination from both human and animal sources. Waterborne transmission of HEV is a public health concern that should lead to the inclusion of HEV in national public health surveillance protocols as a clinically relevant pathogen
Supporting information
(PDF)
Summarize Result of HEV from wastewater.
(PDF)
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the field staff from the Mfoundi Division who participated in identifying the study sites, and to the workers involved in collecting wastewater samples.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
References
- 1.Junaid SA, Agina SE, Abubakar KA. Epidemiology and Associated Risk Factors of Hepatitis E Virus Infection in Plateau State, Nigeria. Virology (Auckl). 2014;5. doi: 10.4137/vrt.s15422 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rodríguez-Lázaro D, Hernandez M, Cook N. Hepatitis E Virus: A New Foodborne Zoonotic Concern. Advances in Food Nutrition Res. Elsevier. 2018. p. 55–70. doi: 10.1016/bs.afnr.2018.04.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Raji YE, Toung OP, Taib NM, Sekawi ZB. Hepatitis E Virus: An emerging enigmatic and underestimated pathogen. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 2022;29(1):499–512. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.09.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cancela F, Icasuriaga R, Cuevas S, Hergatacorzian V, Olivera M, Panzera Y, et al. Epidemiology Update of Hepatitis E Virus (HEV) in Uruguay: Subtyping, Environmental Surveillance and Zoonotic Transmission. Viruses. 2023;15(10):2006. doi: 10.3390/v15102006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bagulo H, Majekodunmi AO, Welburn SC. Hepatitis E in Sub Saharan Africa – A significant emerging disease. One Health. 2020;11:100186. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2020.100186 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Khuroo M, Khuroo M, Khuroo N. Transmission of Hepatitis E Virus in Developing Countries. Viruses. 2016;8(9):253. doi: 10.3390/v8090253 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kirkwood CD, Dobscha KR, Steele AD. Hepatitis E should be a global public health priority: recommendations for improving surveillance and prevention. Expert Review of Vaccines. 2020;19(12):1129–40. doi: 10.1080/14760584.2020.1874930 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Prpić J, Baymakova M. Hepatitis E Virus (HEV) Infection among Humans and Animals: Epidemiology, Clinical Characteristics, Treatment, and Prevention. Pathogens. 2023;12(7):931. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12070931 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wang H, Kjellberg I, Sikora P, Rydberg H, Lindh M, Bergstedt O, et al. Hepatitis E virus genotype 3 strains and a plethora of other viruses detected in raw and still in tap water. Water Research. 2020;168:115141. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.115141 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kenney SP, Meng X-J. Hepatitis E Virus Genome Structure and Replication Strategy. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2018;9(1):a031724. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a031724 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wang B, Meng X-J. Structural and molecular biology of hepatitis E virus. Computational and Structural Biotechnology J. 2021;19:1907–16. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.03.038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sabato DL, Ianiro G, Alborali GL, Kroneman A, Grierson SS. Molecular characterization and phylogenetic analysis of hepatitis E virus (HEV) strains from pigs farmed in eight European countries between 2020 and 2022. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2023;2023:2806835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ianiro G, Pavoni E, Aprea G, Romantini R, Alborali GL, D’Angelantonio D, et al. Cross-sectional study of hepatitis E virus (HEV) circulation in Italian pig farms. Front Vet Sci. 2023;10. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1136225 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pavio N, Kooh P, Cadavez V, Gonzales-Barron U, Thébault A. Risk factors for sporadic hepatitis E infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Microbial Risk Analysis. 2021;17:100129. doi: 10.1016/j.mran.2020.100129 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rau F, Elsner C, Meister TL, Gömer A, Kallies R, Dittmer U, et al. Monitoring of hepatitis E virus in wastewater can identify clinically relevant variants. Liver International. 2024;44(3):637–43. doi: 10.1111/liv.15842 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Takuissu GR, Kenmoe S, Ndip L, Ebogo-Belobo JT, Kengne-Ndé C, Mbaga DS, et al. Hepatitis E Virus in Water Environments: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Food Environ Virol. 2022;14(3):223–35. doi: 10.1007/s12560-022-09530-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kamar N, Dalton HR, Abravanel F, Izopet J. Hepatitis E Virus Infection. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014;27(1):116–38. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00057-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Treagus S, Wright C, Baker-Austin C, Longdon B, Lowther J. The Foodborne Transmission of Hepatitis E Virus to Humans. Food Environ Virol. 2021;13(2):127–45. doi: 10.1007/s12560-021-09461-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Fatawou MA, Chavely MG, Henri MYM, Daniel KN, Claire EZM, Richard N. First Detection and Characterization of Hepatitis E Virus in Sewage Samples in Cameroon. Food Environ Virol. 2023;15(3):255–61. doi: 10.1007/s12560-023-09562-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Salete de Paula V, Wiele M, Mbunkah AH, Daniel AM, Kingsley MT, Schmidt-Chanasit J. Hepatitis E Virus Genotype 3 Strains in Domestic Pigs, Cameroon. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013;19(4):686–8. doi: 10.3201/eid1904.121634 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Modiyinji AF, Sanding GMAM, Atsama MA, Monamele CG, Nola M, Njouom R. Serological and molecular investigation of hepatitis E virus in pigs reservoirs from Cameroon reveals elevated seroprevalence and presence of genotype 3. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(2):e0229073. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229073 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Atsama-Amougou M, Djomsi-Meta D, Ngamaleu MR, Simo FBN, Saha CL, Lamare-Boutgam N, et al. First molecular detection of five gastroenteritis viruses in untreated wastewater and impact of seasonal change on their distribution in Cameroon. One Health. 2025;21:101110. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2025.101110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Greening GE, Hewitt J, Lewis GD. Evaluation of integrated cell culture-PCR (C-PCR) for virological analysis of environmental samples. J Appl Microbiol. 2002;93(5):745–50. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01741.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ejaz M, Zohaib A, Usman M, Anwar MM, Khan HS, Ammar M, et al. Genotypic analysis of hepatitis E virus (HEV) from sporadic symptomatic cases in Pakistan. Infection, Genetics and Evolution. 2024;118:105567. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2024.105567 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Beyer S, Szewzyk R, Gnirss R, Johne R, Selinka H-C. Detection and Characterization of Hepatitis E Virus Genotype 3 in Wastewater and Urban Surface Waters in Germany. Food Environ Virol. 2020;12(2):137–47. doi: 10.1007/s12560-020-09424-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Cuevas-Ferrando E, Pérez-Cataluña A, Falcó I, Randazzo W, Sánchez G. Monitoring Human Viral Pathogens Reveals Potential Hazard for Treated Wastewater Discharge or Reuse. Front Microbiol. 2022;13. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.836193 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Masclaux FG, Hotz P, Friedli D, Savova-Bianchi D, Oppliger A. High occurrence of hepatitis E virus in samples from wastewater treatment plants in Switzerland and comparison with other enteric viruses. Water Research. 2013;47(14):5101–9. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.05.050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wibawa IDN, Muljono DH, Mulyanto, Suryadarma IGA, Tsuda F, Takahashi M, et al. Prevalence of antibodies to hepatitis E virus among apparently healthy humans and pigs in Bali, Indonesia: Identification of a pig infected with a genotype 4 hepatitis E virus. Journal of Medical Virology. 2004;73(1):38–44. doi: 10.1002/jmv.20059 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Frenken K. Irrigation in Southern and Eastern Asia in figures: Aquastat survey, 2011. Rome: Food and Agriculture of the United Nations. 2012. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Farkas K, Cooper DM, McDonald JE, Malham SK, de Rougemont A, Jones DL. Seasonal and spatial dynamics of enteric viruses in wastewater and in riverine and estuarine receiving waters. Science of The Total Environment. 2018;634:1174–83. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ippagunta SK, Naik S, Sharma B, Aggarwal R. Presence of hepatitis E virus in sewage in Northern India: Frequency and seasonal pattern. J Medical Virol. 2007;79(12):1827–31. doi: 10.1002/jmv.21017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Fares A. Seasonality of hepatitis: A review update. J Family Med Prim Care. 2015;4(1):96. doi: 10.4103/2249-4863.152263 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Baez PA, Lopez MC, Duque-Jaramillo A, Pelaez D, Molina F, Navas M-C. First evidence of the Hepatitis E virus in environmental waters in Colombia. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(5):e0177525. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177525 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Tricou V, Bouscaillou J, Laghoe-Nguembe G-L, Béré A, Konamna X, Sélékon B, et al. Hepatitis E virus outbreak associated with rainfall in the Central African Republic in 2008-2009. BMC Infect Dis. 2020;20: 260. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-04961-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.La Rosa G, Fratini M, della Libera S, Iaconelli M, Muscillo M. Emerging and potentially emerging viruses in water environments. Annali dell’Istituto Superiore di Sanità. 2012;48(4):397–406. doi: 10.4415/ANN_12_04_07 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Berto A, Grierson S, Hakze-van der Honing R, Martelli F, Johne R, Reetz J, et al. Hepatitis E Virus in Pork Liver Sausage, France. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;19(2):264–6. doi: 10.3201/eid1902.121255 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Smith DB, Simmonds P, Izopet J, Oliveira-Filho EF, Ulrich RG, Johne R, et al. Proposed reference sequences for hepatitis E virus subtypes. J General Virol. 2016;97(3):537–42. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.000393 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sridhar S, Yip CCY, Wu S, Cai J, Zhang AJ-X, Leung K-H, et al. Rat Hepatitis E Virus as Cause of Persistent Hepatitis after Liver Transplant. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018;24(12):2241–50. doi: 10.3201/eid2412.180937 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Rivero-Juarez A, Frias M, Perez AB, Pineda JA, Reina G, Fuentes-Lopez A, et al. Orthohepevirus C infection as an emerging cause of acute hepatitis in Spain: First report in Europe. J Hepatol. 2022;77(2):326–31. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.01.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]