Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1996 Apr;70(4):1643–1661. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79727-8

Molecular dynamics simulations of water within models of ion channels.

J Breed 1, R Sankararamakrishnan 1, I D Kerr 1, M S Sansom 1
PMCID: PMC1225133  PMID: 8785323

Abstract

The transbilayer pores formed by ion channel proteins contain extended columns of water molecules. The dynamic properties of such waters have been suggested to differ from those of water in its bulk state. Molecular dynamics simulations of ion channel models solvated within and at the mouths of their pores are used to investigate the dynamics and structure of intra-pore water. Three classes of channel model are investigated: a) parallel bundles of hydrophobic (Ala20) alpha-helices; b) eight-stranded hydrophobic (Ala10) antiparallel beta-barrels; and c) parallel bundles of amphipathic alpha-helices (namely, delta-toxin, alamethicin, and nicotinic acetylcholine receptor M2 helix). The self-diffusion coefficients of water molecules within the pores are reduced significantly relative to bulk water in all of the models. Water rotational reorientation rates are also reduced within the pores, particularly in those pores formed by alpha-helix bundles. In the narrowest pore (that of the Ala20 pentameric helix bundle) self-diffusion coefficients and reorientation rates of intra-pore waters are reduced by approximately an order of magnitude relative to bulk solvent. In Ala20 helix bundles the water dipoles orient antiparallel to the helix dipoles. Such dipole/dipole interaction between water and pore may explain how water-filled ion channels may be formed by hydrophobic helices. In the bundles of amphipathic helices the orientation of water dipoles is modulated by the presence of charged side chains. No preferential orientation of water dipoles relative to the pore axis is observed in the hydrophobic beta-barrel models.

Full text

PDF
1643

Images in this article

1646FIGURE 1
on p.1646
1652FIGURE 5
on p.1652
1655FIGURE 7
on p.1655

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams P. D., Arkin I. T., Engelman D. M., Brünger A. T. Computational searching and mutagenesis suggest a structure for the pentameric transmembrane domain of phospholamban. Nat Struct Biol. 1995 Feb;2(2):154–162. doi: 10.1038/nsb0295-154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arkin I. T., Adams P. D., MacKenzie K. R., Lemmon M. A., Brünger A. T., Engelman D. M. Structural organization of the pentameric transmembrane alpha-helices of phospholamban, a cardiac ion channel. EMBO J. 1994 Oct 17;13(20):4757–4764. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06801.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Arkin I. T., Rothman M., Ludlam C. F., Aimoto S., Engelman D. M., Rothschild K. J., Smith S. O. Structural model of the phospholamban ion channel complex in phospholipid membranes. J Mol Biol. 1995 May 12;248(4):824–834. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bertrand D., Galzi J. L., Devillers-Thiéry A., Bertrand S., Changeux J. P. Stratification of the channel domain in neurotransmitter receptors. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1993 Aug;5(4):688–693. doi: 10.1016/0955-0674(93)90141-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bogusz S., Boxer A., Busath D. D. An SS1-SS2 beta-barrel structure for the voltage-activated potassium channel. Protein Eng. 1992 Jun;5(4):285–293. doi: 10.1093/protein/5.4.285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Breed J., Sansom M. S. Alamethicin channels modelled by simulated annealing and molecular dynamics. Biochem Soc Trans. 1994 May;22(2):157S–157S. doi: 10.1042/bst022157s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brooks C. L., 3rd, Karplus M. Solvent effects on protein motion and protein effects on solvent motion. Dynamics of the active site region of lysozyme. J Mol Biol. 1989 Jul 5;208(1):159–181. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90093-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Charnet P., Labarca C., Leonard R. J., Vogelaar N. J., Czyzyk L., Gouin A., Davidson N., Lester H. A. An open-channel blocker interacts with adjacent turns of alpha-helices in the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Neuron. 1990 Jan;4(1):87–95. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(90)90445-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chiu S. W., Jakobsson E., Subramaniam S., McCammon J. A. Time-correlation analysis of simulated water motion in flexible and rigid gramicidin channels. Biophys J. 1991 Jul;60(1):273–285. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(91)82049-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chiu S. W., Novotny J. A., Jakobsson E. The nature of ion and water barrier crossings in a simulated ion channel. Biophys J. 1993 Jan;64(1):98–109. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81344-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cowan S. W., Schirmer T., Rummel G., Steiert M., Ghosh R., Pauptit R. A., Jansonius J. N., Rosenbusch J. P. Crystal structures explain functional properties of two E. coli porins. Nature. 1992 Aug 27;358(6389):727–733. doi: 10.1038/358727a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Daggett V., Levitt M. Realistic simulations of native-protein dynamics in solution and beyond. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1993;22:353–380. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.22.060193.002033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dani J. A., Levitt D. G. Diffusion and kinetic approaches to describe permeation in ionic channels. J Theor Biol. 1990 Oct 7;146(3):289–301. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(05)80740-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Esposito G., Carver J. A., Boyd J., Campbell I. D. High-resolution 1H NMR study of the solution structure of alamethicin. Biochemistry. 1987 Feb 24;26(4):1043–1050. doi: 10.1021/bi00378a010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fox R. O., Jr, Richards F. M. A voltage-gated ion channel model inferred from the crystal structure of alamethicin at 1.5-A resolution. Nature. 1982 Nov 25;300(5890):325–330. doi: 10.1038/300325a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Granick S. Motions and relaxations of confined liquids. Science. 1991 Sep 20;253(5026):1374–1379. doi: 10.1126/science.253.5026.1374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Green M. E., Lewis J. Monte Carlo simulation of the water in a channel with charges. Biophys J. 1991 Feb;59(2):419–426. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(91)82235-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gutman M., Tsfadia Y., Masad A., Nachliel E. Quantitation of physical-chemical properties of the aqueous phase inside the phoE ionic channel. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1992 Aug 24;1109(2):141–148. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(92)90077-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Karshikoff A., Spassov V., Cowan S. W., Ladenstein R., Schirmer T. Electrostatic properties of two porin channels from Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 1994 Jul 22;240(4):372–384. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kerr I. D., Dufourcq J., Rice J. A., Fredkin D. R., Sansom M. S. Ion channel formation by synthetic analogues of staphylococcal delta-toxin. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1995 Jun 14;1236(2):219–227. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(95)00051-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kerr I. D., Sankararamakrishnan R., Smart O. S., Sansom M. S. Parallel helix bundles and ion channels: molecular modeling via simulated annealing and restrained molecular dynamics. Biophys J. 1994 Oct;67(4):1501–1515. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80624-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Komeiji Y., Uebayasi M., Someya J., Yamato I. A molecular dynamics study of solvent behavior around a protein. Proteins. 1993 Jul;16(3):268–277. doi: 10.1002/prot.340160305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kreusch A., Schulz G. E. Refined structure of the porin from Rhodopseudomonas blastica. Comparison with the porin from Rhodobacter capsulatus. J Mol Biol. 1994 Nov 11;243(5):891–905. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lear J. D., Wasserman Z. R., DeGrado W. F. Synthetic amphiphilic peptide models for protein ion channels. Science. 1988 May 27;240(4856):1177–1181. doi: 10.1126/science.2453923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Levitt M., Sharon R. Accurate simulation of protein dynamics in solution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Oct;85(20):7557–7561. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.20.7557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mellor I. R., Thomas D. H., Sansom M. S. Properties of ion channels formed by Staphylococcus aureus delta-toxin. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1988 Jul 21;942(2):280–294. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(88)90030-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Menestrina G., Voges K. P., Jung G., Boheim G. Voltage-dependent channel formation by rods of helical polypeptides. J Membr Biol. 1986;93(2):111–132. doi: 10.1007/BF01870804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Montal M. Design of molecular function: channels of communication. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1995;24:31–57. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.24.060195.000335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Oiki S., Madison V., Montal M. Bundles of amphipathic transmembrane alpha-helices as a structural motif for ion-conducting channel proteins: studies on sodium channels and acetylcholine receptors. Proteins. 1990;8(3):226–236. doi: 10.1002/prot.340080305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Oliver A. E., Deamer D. W. Alpha-helical hydrophobic polypeptides form proton-selective channels in lipid bilayers. Biophys J. 1994 May;66(5):1364–1379. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80927-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Roux B., Karplus M. Ion transport in a model gramicidin channel. Structure and thermodynamics. Biophys J. 1991 May;59(5):961–981. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(91)82311-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Roux B., Karplus M. Molecular dynamics simulations of the gramicidin channel. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1994;23:731–761. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.23.060194.003503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sancho M., Partenskii M. B., Dorman V., Jordan P. C. Extended dipolar chain model for ion channels: electrostriction effects and the translocational energy barrier. Biophys J. 1995 Feb;68(2):427–433. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80204-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sankararamakrishnan R., Samsom M. S. Kinked structures of isolated nicotinic receptor M2 helices: a molecular dynamics study. Biopolymers. 1994 Dec;34(12):1647–1657. doi: 10.1002/bip.360341209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sankararamakrishnan R., Sansom M. S. Modelling packing interactions in parallel helix bundles: pentameric bundles of nicotinic receptor M2 helices. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1995 Nov 1;1239(2):122–132. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(95)00165-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Sankararamakrishnan R., Sansom M. S. Water-mediated conformational transitions in nicotinic receptor M2 helix bundles: a molecular dynamics study. FEBS Lett. 1995 Dec 27;377(3):377–382. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(95)01376-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Sansom M. S., Kerr I. D., Breed J., Sankararamakrishnan R. Water in channel-like cavities: structure and dynamics. Biophys J. 1996 Feb;70(2):693–702. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79609-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Sansom M. S., Kerr I. D. Transbilayer pores formed by beta-barrels: molecular modeling of pore structures and properties. Biophys J. 1995 Oct;69(4):1334–1343. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80000-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Sansom M. S., Sankararamakrishnan R., Kerr I. D. Modelling membrane proteins using structural restraints. Nat Struct Biol. 1995 Aug;2(8):624–631. doi: 10.1038/nsb0895-624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Sansom M. S. Structure and function of channel-forming peptaibols. Q Rev Biophys. 1993 Nov;26(4):365–421. doi: 10.1017/s0033583500002833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Sansom M. S. The biophysics of peptide models of ion channels. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1991;55(3):139–235. doi: 10.1016/0079-6107(91)90004-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Schirmer T., Keller T. A., Wang Y. F., Rosenbusch J. P. Structural basis for sugar translocation through maltoporin channels at 3.1 A resolution. Science. 1995 Jan 27;267(5197):512–514. doi: 10.1126/science.7824948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Simonson T., Perahia D. Internal and interfacial dielectric properties of cytochrome c from molecular dynamics in aqueous solution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Feb 14;92(4):1082–1086. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.4.1082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Smart O. S., Goodfellow J. M., Wallace B. A. The pore dimensions of gramicidin A. Biophys J. 1993 Dec;65(6):2455–2460. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81293-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Steinhoff H. J., Kramm B., Hess G., Owerdieck C., Redhardt A. Rotational and translational water diffusion in the hemoglobin hydration shell: dielectric and proton nuclear relaxation measurements. Biophys J. 1993 Oct;65(4):1486–1495. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81217-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Tappin M. J., Pastore A., Norton R. S., Freer J. H., Campbell I. D. High-resolution 1H NMR study of the solution structure of delta-hemolysin. Biochemistry. 1988 Mar 8;27(5):1643–1647. doi: 10.1021/bi00405a038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Teeter M. M. Water-protein interactions: theory and experiment. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1991;20:577–600. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.20.060191.003045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Unwin N. Acetylcholine receptor channel imaged in the open state. Nature. 1995 Jan 5;373(6509):37–43. doi: 10.1038/373037a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Unwin N. The structure of ion channels in membranes of excitable cells. Neuron. 1989 Dec;3(6):665–676. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(89)90235-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES