Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1995 Jul;140(3):917–932. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.3.917

The Log-Linear Relationship between Sexual Isolation and Sequence Divergence in Bacillus Transformation Is Robust

P Zawadzki 1, M S Roberts 1, F M Cohan 1
PMCID: PMC1206676  PMID: 7672591

Abstract

The relationship between sexual isolation and sequence divergence in Bacillus transformation was previously shown to be log linear. In the present study, we have shown that this relationship is robust with respect to naturally occurring genetic variation among recipient strains of Bacillus subtilis and B. mojavensis. Naturally occurring restriction endonuclease activity was shown not to affect this relationship. Also, seven out of eight recombination mutants tested for their sensitivity to sequence divergence have shown the same relationship between sequence divergence and sexual isolation; a mutant for recH was more sensitive to sequence divergence, suggesting that the product of this gene may be involved in resolution of mismatches in heterogamic transformation. We have also shown that the relationship between sexual isolation and sequence divergence is robust with respect to variation in the conditions of transformation, including variation in the length of donor DNA, the concentration of donor DNA, and intracellular competition between donor-derived and recipient-derived DNA. The robustness of the relationship between sexual isolation and sequence divergence among naturally occurring strains and across transformation conditions allows us to predict the eventual outcome of sequence divergence among B. subtilis and its closest relatives.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.7 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alonso J. C., Lüder G., Trautner T. A. Intramolecular homologous recombination in Bacillus subtilis 168. Mol Gen Genet. 1992 Dec;236(1):60–64. doi: 10.1007/BF00279643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ikawa S., Shibata T., Ando T., Saito H. Genetic studies on site-specific endodeoxyribonucleases in Bacillus subtilis: multiple modification and restriction systems in transformants of Bacillus subtilis 168. Mol Gen Genet. 1980 Feb;177(3):359–368. doi: 10.1007/BF00271474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kooistra J., Venema G. Cloning, sequencing, and expression of Bacillus subtilis genes involved in ATP-dependent nuclease synthesis. J Bacteriol. 1991 Jun;173(12):3644–3655. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.12.3644-3655.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lorenz M. G., Aardema B. W., Wackernagel W. Highly efficient genetic transformation of Bacillus subtilis attached to sand grains. J Gen Microbiol. 1988 Jan;134(1):107–112. doi: 10.1099/00221287-134-1-107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Matsumoto K., Takahashi H., Saito H., Ikeda Y. Genetic defects in DNA repair system and enhancement of intergenote transformation efficiency in Bacillus subtilis Marburg. Mol Gen Genet. 1978 Jul 4;162(3):229–235. doi: 10.1007/BF00268847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Morrison D. A., Guild W. R. Activity of deoxyribonucleic acid fragments of defined size in Bacillus subtilis transformation. J Bacteriol. 1972 Oct;112(1):220–223. doi: 10.1128/jb.112.1.220-223.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rayssiguier C., Thaler D. S., Radman M. The barrier to recombination between Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium is disrupted in mismatch-repair mutants. Nature. 1989 Nov 23;342(6248):396–401. doi: 10.1038/342396a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Roberts M. S., Cohan F. M. The effect of DNA sequence divergence on sexual isolation in Bacillus. Genetics. 1993 Jun;134(2):401–408. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.2.401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Roberts M. S., Nakamura L. K., Cohan F. M. Bacillus mojavensis sp. nov., distinguishable from Bacillus subtilis by sexual isolation, divergence in DNA sequence, and differences in fatty acid composition. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1994 Apr;44(2):256–264. doi: 10.1099/00207713-44-2-256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Te Riele H. P., Venema G. Molecular fate of heterologous bacterial DNA in competent Bacillus subtilis. II. Unstable association of heterologous DNA with the recipient chromosome. Genetics. 1982 Nov;102(3):329–340. doi: 10.1093/genetics/102.3.329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Trautner T. A., Pawlek B., Bron S., Anagnostopoulos C. Restriction and modification in B. subtilis. Biological aspects. Mol Gen Genet. 1974;131(3):181–191. doi: 10.1007/BF00267958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wilson G. G. Organization of restriction-modification systems. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 May 25;19(10):2539–2566. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.10.2539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. te Riele H. P., Venema G. Molecular fate of heterologous bacterial DNA in competent Bacillus subtilis. I. Processing of B. pumilus and B. licheniformis DNA in B. subtilis. Genetics. 1982 Jun;101(2):179–188. doi: 10.1093/genetics/101.2.179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. te Riele H. P., Venema G. Molecular fate of heterologous bacterial DNA in competent Bacillus subtilis: further characterization of unstable association between donor and recipient DNA and the involvement of the cellular membrane. Mol Gen Genet. 1984;195(1-2):200–208. doi: 10.1007/BF00332747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES