Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1988 Dec;120(4):987–1001. doi: 10.1093/genetics/120.4.987

The Effects of Translocations on Recombination Frequency in Caenorhabditis Elegans

K S McKim 1, A M Howell 1, A M Rose 1
PMCID: PMC1203590  PMID: 3224815

Abstract

In the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, recombination suppression in translocation heterozygotes is severe and extensive. We have examined the meiotic properties of two translocations involving chromosome I, szT1(I;X) and hT1(I;V). No recombination was observed in either of these translocation heterozygotes along the left (let-362-unc-13) 17 map units of chromosome I. Using half-translocations as free duplications, we mapped the breakpoints of szT1 and hT1. The boundaries of crossover suppression coincided with the physical breakpoints. We propose that DNA sequences at the right end of chromosome I facilitate pairing and recombination. We use the data from translocations of other chromosomes to map the location of pairing sites on four other chromosomes. hT1 and szT1 differed markedly in their effect on recombination adjacent to the crossover suppressed region. hT1 had no effect on recombination in the adjacent interval. In contrast, the 0.8 map unit interval immediately adjacent to the szT1(I;X) breakpoint on chromosome I increased to 2.5 map units in translocation heterozygotes. This increase occurs in a chromosomal interval which can be expanded by treatment with radiation. These results are consistent with the suggestion that the szT1(I) breakpoint is in a region of DNA in which meiotic recombination is suppressed relative to the genomic average. We propose that DNA sequences disrupted by the szT1 translocation are responsible for determining the frequency of meiotic recombination in the vicinity of the breakpoint.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.5 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Albertson D. G., Thomson J. N. The kinetochores of Caenorhabditis elegans. Chromosoma. 1982;86(3):409–428. doi: 10.1007/BF00292267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker B. S., Carpenter A. T., Esposito M. S., Esposito R. E., Sandler L. The genetic control of meiosis. Annu Rev Genet. 1976;10:53–134. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.10.120176.000413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Burnham C. R., Stout J. T., Weinheimer W. H., Kowles R. V., Phillips R. L. Chromosome pairing in maize. Genetics. 1972 May;71(1):111–126. doi: 10.1093/genetics/71.1.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Craymer L. Techniques for manipulating chromosomal rearrangements and their application to Drosophila melanogaster. I. Pericentric inversions. Genetics. 1981 Sep;99(1):75–97. doi: 10.1093/genetics/99.1.75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ferguson E. L., Horvitz H. R. Identification and characterization of 22 genes that affect the vulval cell lineages of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1985 May;110(1):17–72. doi: 10.1093/genetics/110.1.17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Greenwald I., Coulson A., Sulston J., Priess J. Correlation of the physical and genetic maps in the lin-12 region of Caenorhabditis elegans. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987 Mar 11;15(5):2295–2307. doi: 10.1093/nar/15.5.2295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hawley R. S. Chromosomal sites necessary for normal levels of meiotic recombination in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Evidence for and mapping of the sites. Genetics. 1980 Mar;94(3):625–646. doi: 10.1093/genetics/94.3.625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Herman R. K. Crossover suppressors and balanced recessive lethals in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1978 Jan;88(1):49–65. doi: 10.1093/genetics/88.1.49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Herman R. K., Kari C. K., Hartman P. S. Dominant X-chromosome nondisjunction mutants of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1982 Nov;102(3):379–400. doi: 10.1093/genetics/102.3.379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kim J. S., Rose A. M. The effect of gamma radiation on recombination frequency in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genome. 1987 Jun;29(3):457–462. doi: 10.1139/g87-079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lambie E. J., Roeder G. S. Repression of meiotic crossing over by a centromere (CEN3) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1986 Nov;114(3):769–789. doi: 10.1093/genetics/114.3.769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Muller H J. The Regionally Differential Effect of X Rays on Crossing over in Autosomes of Drosophila. Genetics. 1925 Sep;10(5):470–507. doi: 10.1093/genetics/10.5.470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rickards G. K. Orientation behavior of chromosome multiples of interchange (reciprocal translocation) heterozygotes. Annu Rev Genet. 1983;17:443–498. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.17.120183.002303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Roberts P. A. Screening for x-ray-induced crossover suppressors in Drosophila melanogaster: prevalence and effectiveness of translocations. Genetics. 1970 Jul;65(3):429–448. doi: 10.1093/genetics/65.3.429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rogalski T. M., Riddle D. L. A Caenorhabditis elegans RNA polymerase II gene, ama-1 IV, and nearby essential genes. Genetics. 1988 Jan;118(1):61–74. doi: 10.1093/genetics/118.1.61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rose A. M., Baillie D. L. A mutation in Caenorhabditis elegans that increases recombination frequency more than threefold. Nature. 1979 Oct 18;281(5732):599–600. doi: 10.1038/281599a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rose A. M., Baillie D. L., Curran J. Meiotic pairing behavior of two free duplications of linkage group I in Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol Gen Genet. 1984;195(1-2):52–56. doi: 10.1007/BF00332723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rose A. M., Baillie D. L. Genetic organization of the region around UNC-15 (I), a gene affecting paramyosin in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1980 Nov;96(3):639–648. doi: 10.1093/genetics/96.3.639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Rose A. M., Baillie D. L. The Effect of Temperature and Parental Age on Recombination and Nondisjunction in CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS. Genetics. 1979 Jun;92(2):409–418. doi: 10.1093/genetics/92.2.409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rosenbluth R. E., Baillie D. L. The genetic analysis of a reciprocal translocation, eT1(III; V), in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1981 Nov-Dec;99(3-4):415–428. doi: 10.1093/genetics/99.3-4.415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rosenbluth R. E., Cuddeford C., Baillie D. L. Mutagenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans. II. A spectrum of mutational events induced with 1500 r of gamma-radiation. Genetics. 1985 Mar;109(3):493–511. doi: 10.1093/genetics/109.3.493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Szauter P. An analysis of regional constraints on exchange in Drosophila melanogaster using recombination-defective meiotic mutants. Genetics. 1984 Jan;106(1):45–71. doi: 10.1093/genetics/106.1.45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES