Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Feb 10.
Published in final edited form as: Oncogene. 2023 May 31;42(27):2183–2194. doi: 10.1038/s41388-023-02715-5

SOX9 drives KRAS-induced lung adenocarcinoma progression and suppresses anti-tumor immunity

Hua Zhong 1,2,3, Wen Lu 4, Yong Tang 5,6, Clotilde Wiel 7,8, Yong Wei 5,6, Jian Cao 1,2, Gregory Riedlinger 1,9, Thales Papagiannakopoulos 10, Jessie Yanxiang Guo 1,2,11, Martin O Bergo 8, Yibin Kang 5,6, Shridar Ganesan 1,2, Hatim E Sabaawy 1,2,9,12, Sharon R Pine 1,2,3,12,✉
PMCID: PMC11809655  NIHMSID: NIHMS2050316  PMID: 37258742

Abstract

The SOX9 transcription factor ensures proper tissue development and homeostasis and has been implicated in promoting tumor progression. However, the role of SOX9 as a driver of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), or any cancer, remains unclear. Using CRISPR/Cas9 and Cre-LoxP gene knockout approaches in the KrasG12D-driven mouse LUAD model, we found that loss of Sox9 significantly reduces lung tumor development, burden and progression, contributing to significantly longer overall survival. SOX9 consistently drove organoid growth in vitro, but SOX9-promoted tumor growth was significantly attenuated in immunocompromised mice compared to syngeneic mice. We demonstrate that SOX9 suppresses immune cell infiltration and functionally suppresses tumor associated CD8+ T, natural killer and dendritic cells. These data were validated by flow cytometry, gene expression, RT-qPCR, and immunohistochemistry analyses in KrasG12D-driven murine LUAD, then confirmed by interrogating bulk and single-cell gene expression repertoires and immunohistochemistry in human LUAD. Notably, SOX9 significantly elevates collagen-related gene expression and substantially increases collagen fibers. We propose that SOX9 increases tumor stiffness and inhibits tumor-infiltrating dendritic cells, thereby suppressing CD8+ T cell and NK cell infiltration and activity. Thus, SOX9 drives KrasG12D-driven lung tumor progression and inhibits anti-tumor immunity at least partly by modulating the tumor microenvironment.

INTRODUCTION

The SOX9 transcription factor ensures proper development and homeostasis, including chondrogenesis, bone formation, neocortical expansion, lung branching morphogenesis, and testis and pancreas development, through determining cell lineage fate and regulating cell proliferation [1–8]. Loss-of-function heterozygous SOX9 mutations in humans cause campomelic dysplasia, a congenital disorder that affects skeletal and reproductive organ development and frequently causes death during the neonatal period due to respiratory insufficiency [9, 10]. In mice, Sox9 knockout causes embryonic lethality at E11.5 and its heterozygous knockout causes perinatal mortality [11]. SOX9 has been implicated as oncogenic in human cancers and its overexpression is significantly associated with poor overall survival [12]. However, as is common among transcription factors, SOX9 has a tumor suppressor role in some cancers such as melanoma and cervical and bladder cancer [13–16].

SOX9 can be induced transcriptionally by KRAS [17], NOTCH [18], EGFR [19], YAP [20], NRF2 [21], and TGF-β [22] signaling, or post-translationally via protein stabilization [17, 23–26]. In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), SOX9 drives epithelial-mesenchymal transition and promotes resistance to EGFR inhibitors through the Wnt/β-catenin pathway [27, 28]. SOX9 has also been implicated as a predictive biomarker for lung cancer progression and therapy resistance [29]. In lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), KRAS is the most frequently mutated oncogene, accounting for more than 30% of cases [30]. We previously reported that SOX9 is significantly upregulated in KRASmut LUAD [18]. Although SOX9 increases cell proliferation, motility, and invasion, inhibits apoptosis, promotes stem cell features, and induces epithelial–mesenchymal transition [18, 22, 23, 25, 31], the role of SOX9 in driving LUAD development or progression has never been determined. Because loss of Sox9 inhibits KrasG12D-induced pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia in mice [32], and SOX9 is upregulated in human KrasG12V-mutant pancreatic cells [17], we utilized the KrasLSL-G12D mouse LUAD model to investigate the oncogenic function of Sox9 during lung tumorigenesis. We found that loss of Sox9 significantly suppresses KrasG12D-driven lung tumor development, prolongs survival, and prevents tumor progression from low to high grade in KrasG12D mice. Through tumor grafting in immunocompetent and immunocompromised mice and mouse tumor organoid models, as well as human LUAD, we revealed that SOX9 increases tumor stiffness and suppresses anti-tumor immunity through an orchestrated RNA expression network.

RESULTS

SOX9 significantly contributes to LUAD progression

SOX9 is overexpressed in numerous cancers [33] and its upregulation is associated with worse survival in human NSCLC [34]. Utilizing the TCGA LUAD dataset, we confirmed that patients with SOX9-high tumors (top 20% of tumor samples) showed significantly shorter survival (p = 0.0039, Fig. 1a) and SOX9-low patients (lowest 15% of tumor samples) showed significantly longer survival.

Fig. 1. SOX9 promotes lung tumor progression and loss of Sox9 prevents high-grade tumor formation and increases survival.

Fig. 1

a SOX9-high patients (in red) showed significantly decreased survival while SOX9-low patients (in gray) showed longer survival. Patients with SOX9 expression from top 20% are defined as SOX9 high, lower 15% defined as SOX9 low, and all other patients are labeled in black. b, c Tumor number and burden quantification from pSECC-sgSox9.2 or sgTom mice at 18, 24 and 30 weeks after inhalation. Combined quantification of tumor number and burden are included. d H&E staining shows tumor number and burden differences between sgSox9.2 and sgTom mice. d, e SOX9 is highly expressed in grade-3 tumors with no or low expression in lower-grade tumors. SOX9+ tumor area also shows high percentage of Ki67+ cells (e). f Left plot shows the percentage distribution of SOX9+ cells in grade 2 and 3 tumors at 24 and 30 weeks. Right plot shows the quantification of tumor grades in sgSox9.2 or sgTom mice and the quantification of SOX9+ tumors in different tumor grades. g The percentage of Ki67+ cells is significantly higher in SOX9+ tumors. h Cre-mediated Sox9 knockout provides longer survival for KrasG12D lung cancer mice. KSw/w: KrasG12D;Sox9wt/wt; KSf/f: KrasG12D;Sox9flox/flox. i Representative images show that lung tumors with loss of Sox9 have decreased tumor burden and SOX9 is mainly expressed in tumor grade 3. j Lung tumor burden quantification of KSw/w and KSf/f mice. k Lung tumor grade quantification of KSw/w and KSf/f mice. Numbers shown in the bar are the numbers of counted tumors. *Fisher’s exact test was used to calculate the p values, with SOX9+ tumors included or excluded from KSf/f group.

We utilized the KrasLSL-G12D mouse LUAD model to determine if SOX9 directly contributes to lung carcinogenesis. To test this, we first achieved Sox9 loss-of-function through a pSECC CRISPR-mediated genome editing system [35], in which CRISPR and Cre were combined to knockout Sox9 and activate KrasG12D, respectively. We designed three guide RNAs to target Sox9, taking tdTomato guide RNA (sgTom) as the control [35], and one was selected for the in vivo studies (sgSox9.2-pSECC). At weeks 18, 24 and 30 after intratracheal delivery, both tumor number (Fig. 1b, d) and burden (Fig. 1c, d) were significantly decreased (p = 0.018 and 0.029, respectively) when Sox9 was knocked out.

To determine if SOX9 accelerates Kras-induced lung tumor progression, we compared the SOX9 expression patterns to tumor grade distributions [36]. By 18 weeks, both sgTom and sgSox9.2 lungs showed only grade 1 or 2 tumors and did not display SOX9 expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) (data not shown). Strikingly, by 24 and 30 weeks, 12 grade 3 tumors were observed in the control lungs, while only one grade 3 tumor was identified in the Sox9 knockout lungs (Fig. 1d–f). Most of the grade 2 tumors at 24 and 30 weeks were SOX9-negative (SOX9−, Fig. 1e, f) but some showed a low percentage of SOX9-positive (SOX9+) cells (0.52–19.05%, Fig. 1d, f). In contrast, SOX9 was highly upregulated in all the grade 3 tumors (9.87–48.77%), including the one grade 3 tumor from the Sox9 knockout mouse (Fig. 1f). Because cell proliferation is a clinical marker for tumor progression, we next asked if SOX9-associated tumor progression correlates with increased cell proliferation. Indeed, we observed a significantly higher percentage of Ki67 positive (Ki67+) cells in SOX9+ tumors (p = 0.00092, Fig. 1e, g). In conclusion, Sox9 loss-of-function significantly decreases both tumor number and tumor burden, as well as suppresses LUAD tumor progression, and SOX9 is mainly expressed in larger, proliferative, and high-grade tumors. These data suggest Sox9 is a driver of LUAD tumor growth and progression.

To confirm that loss of Sox9 reduces KrasG12D-induced tumorigenesis, we utilized KrasLSL-G12D;Sox9w/w (KSw/w) and KrasLSL-G12D; Sox9flox/flox (KSf/f) genetically engineered mouse models (GEMM), with lenti-Cre intratracheal delivery to achieve KrasG12D-driven tumors with or without Sox9. As shown in Fig. 1h, KSf/f mice had significantly longer survival than KSw/w mice (p = 0.0012). At the endpoint (380 days), we sacrificed all surviving mice (9 KSw/w and 18 KSf/f) and compared their tumor burden and tumor grade distribution. Consistent with the CRISPR-generated Sox9 knockout model, lenti-Cre induced Sox9 knockout GEMMs showed significantly reduced lung tumor burden (p = 0.011, Fig. 1i, j). Moreover, in KSw/w mice, we confirmed that SOX9 was highly upregulated in all grade 3 tumors, and these high-grade tumors showed dysplastic features such as larger nuclear-cytoplasmic ratio, pleomorphic nuclei, prominent nucleoli, nuclear molding and/or signet ring structures. Consistently, most of the grade 2 tumors were SOX9−, or had a very low percentage of SOX9+ cells (Fig. 1i). We noted that SOX9+ tumors were much larger than the SOX9− tumors and they were responsible for the higher tumor burden (Fig. 1i). Once more, significantly increased Ki67+ cells were observed in SOX9+ tumors (Fig. 1g). In contrast, in KSf/f mice, we observed significantly fewer grade 3 tumors compared to KSw/w mice (p = 0.049; p = 0.0008, SOX9+ tumors excluded from KSf/f mice). Noteworthy, 33% of these grade 3 tumors were SOX9+ (Fig. 1k). The few SOX9− grade 3 tumors that were present displayed only a portion of grade 3 features such as pleomorphic nuclei, prominent nucleoli and nuclear molding, but they did not show a high nuclear-cytoplasmic ratio (Fig. 1i). Therefore, these data demonstrate that SOX9 contributes to KrasG12D-driven lung tumor development and progression.

SOX9 increases KrasG12D tumor cell proliferation

To demonstrate that Sox9 upregulation directly contributes to lung tumor cell growth, we utilized two KrasG12D mouse lung tumor mTC11 and mTC14 cell lines with low endogenous SOX9 expression (Fig. 2a and Fig. S1a) and performed in vitro gain- and loss-of-function assays (Fig. 2; Fig. S1). In a two-dimensional (2D) culture system, we did not observe growth differences between control and Sox9 overexpression in either of the models (data not shown). We further performed growth comparisons through a three-dimensional (3D) tumor organoid culture assay as well as an allograft transplantation model in syngeneic C57BL/6 J mice. As shown in Fig. 2b, d, f, i, the average tumor organoid sizes and number of cells per organoid of mTC11-mSox9OE were significantly more than those of mTC11-EV control. We examined SOX9 and Ki67 expression by IHC (Fig. 2f) and found that Ki67 expression was significantly correlated with SOX9 expression in mTC11-EV (r = 0.75, Fig. S1b) and mSox9OE organoids (r = 0.58, Fig. S1b), and mTC11-mSox9OE organoids had significantly higher Ki67 expression than in mTC11-EV organoids (p = 0.0039, Fig. 2h). These data confirmed that higher SOX9 expression contributes to lung tumor cell growth.

Fig. 2. SOX9 promotes growth of KrasG12D mouse lung tumor cells in 3D organoid culture and subcutaneous transplantation systems.

Fig. 2

a Western blots show SOX9 overexpression (mSox9OE) and SOX9 knockouts (sgSox9.2 and sgSox9.3) in KrasG12D mouse lung tumor cells (mTC11). Empty vector (EV) is a control for mSox9OE. sgTom is a control for Sox9 knockouts. b, c Representative images of mTC11-EV and mSox9OE organoids (b) and mTC11-sgTom, sgSox9.2 and sgSox9.3 (c) from day 1 and 7. d, e Organoid size quantification at 4 different timepoints shows mSox9OE significantly increases organoid cell growth (d) while Sox9 knockout significantly deceases organoid cell growth (e). f, g Representative images of SOX9 and Ki67 IHC staining in mSox9OE (f) and Sox9 knockout (g) organoids. h Quantification of Ki67+ cells shows that mSox9OE organoids have significantly higher percentage of Ki67+ cells than EV group and Sox9 knockout organoids have significant lower percentage of Ki67+ cells than sgTom group. In both Sox9 knockout groups, sgSox9.2 and sgSox9.3, SOX9+ organoids also show higher percentage of Ki67+ cells on average. i Cell number quantification shows that mSox9OE organoids contain significantly more cells compared to EV, and Sox9 knockout organoids contain significantly less cells compared to sgTom. j mSox9OE subcutaneous tumors show significantly faster growth than the EV group and Sox9 knockouts show significantly slower growth than the sgTom group. 1 × 106 cells were injected subcutaneously. k mSox9OE subcutaneous tumors display higher percentage of Ki67+ cells. l mSox9OE subcutaneous tumors display lower percentage of TUNEL positive cells.

Since most of the tumor organoids harbored SOX9+ cells (Fig. S1c), we knocked out Sox9 in these models by CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing (Fig. 2a; Fig. S1a) to test if loss of Sox9 decreases lung tumor organoid and allograft growth. Two guide RNAs were selected (sgSox9.2 and sgSox9.3). To avoid potential clonal selection bias and to match the in vivo studies, early passage knockout cells at the population level were used. As expected, both mTC11-sgSox9.2 and sgSox9.3 organoids were significantly smaller (Fig. 2c, e), with fewer cells (Fig. 2g, i), and decreased Ki67 expression (Fig. 2g, h) as compared to controls. To exclude the possibility of off-targeting effects of the Sox9 CRISPR guide RNAs, and to confirm SOX9 function in the observed tumor cell growth, we reintroduced human SOX9 (hSOX9), which we designed to avoid the cleavage by the guide RNAs, to Sox9 knockout cell lines (sgSox9.2 and its control sgTom), and we confirmed endogenous, transgene and knockout SOX9 expression (Fig. S1d). Consistently, hSOX9 significantly increased the size of organoids compared to empty vector (all p < 0.01, Fig. S1e, f). Through further SOX9 and Ki67 IHC examination (Fig. S1g), exogenous overexpression of hSOX9 significantly restored the Sox9 knockout phenotypes, including significantly higher proliferation compared to knockouts, to levels that were similar to controls (Fig. S1h–k).

To test if Sox9 directly contributes to tumor burden, we measured tumor growth using Sox9-overexpressing and Sox9-knockout lung tumor cells in vivo through subcutaneous allografts. We observed that mTC11-mSox9OE tumors grew significantly faster (p = 0.0016) whereas mTC11-sgSox9.2 and mTC11-sgSox9.3 tumors grew significantly slower (both p values < 0.05), as compared to their respective control tumors (Fig. 2j). These data were replicated with mTC14 tumors (Fig. S2a, b). As expected, Sox9 overexpressed subcutaneous tumors displayed significantly more Ki67+ cells (p = 0.045, Fig. 2k) and fewer apoptotic cells (p < 0.001, Fig. 2l). Additionally, in lung cancer SOX9 was reported to promote cancer stem cells (CSC) [25], driving tumor initiation and progression. To examine if our observed phenotypes are partially due to CSC expansion, we examined expression of CD44 (a CSC marker) and found its expression was not significantly altered by Sox9 expression in the mouse lung tumor cells (Fig. S3a) although there was a significant correlation between expression of SOX9 and CD44 in a comprehensive panel of NSCLC cell lines (Fig. S3b). These results in total confirm that Sox9 contributes to lung tumor progression and increased tumor burden at least partly through increased proliferation and decreased apoptosis.

RNA sequencing revealed immune suppression in Sox9-overexpressed KrasG12D lung tumors

To explore the mechanisms by which SOX9 contributes to lung tumor growth and progression, we performed RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) on mTC11-EV and mTC11-mSox9OE subcutaneous syngeneic allografts. A total of 373 significantly up-regulated and 471 significantly down-regulated genes (Fig. 3a, Supplementary Table 1) from mSox9OE tumors were detected and utilized to perform gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA). All differentially regulated pathways with adjusted p values less than 0.05 are shown in Fig. 3b and Supplementary Table 2. As expected, mSox9OE significantly upregulated the cell proliferation pathway (Fig. 3b), and other known SOX9-regulated pathways, including response to extracellular stimulus, RAS signal, and duct morphogenesis. Notably, the pathway immune system process displayed the most significant downregulation (Fig. 3b). To better understand how SOX9 modulates immune suppression, we performed GSEA on immune-related gene sets (Supplementary Table 3). Using cutoff p value < 0.05 and FDR < 0.25, we found that 14 immune subsets were significantly downregulated in mSox9OE tumors (Fig. 3c, Supplementary Table 2). Finally, 15 immune gene subsets and 65 included genes (Fig. 3c) were found. We investigated these genes in KrasG12V mouse lung tumors, which were collected by microdissection at 10 months after tumor initiation (GSE65258) [37]. Compared to normal mouse lung tissues, we selected 3 tumors as Sox9-high and 3 as Sox9-low (Fig. 3d). Through the comparison of Sox9-high vs. Sox9-low tumors, we found that 22 out of 65 (34%, labeled in red) were replicated in KrasG12V mouse LUAD (Fig. 3c, Supplementary Table 4). These 22 genes included CD8+ T cell specific genes (Cd3g, Zap70, and Cd8a) and natural killer (NK) cell specific genes (Nkg7 and Klrd1), suggesting that Sox9 expression in lung tumors is correlated with suppression of CD8+ T cells and NK cells.

Fig. 3. Cell proliferation and immune suppression are significantly associated with Sox9 overexpression.

Fig. 3

a Volcano plot shows significantly down- and up-regulated genes in mTC11-mSox9OE subcutaneous tumors, taking fold change (FC) 1.5 and adjusted p value 0.1 as cutoff. b Bar plot shows significantly altered pathways analyzed from genes in (a), with adjusted p value less than 0.05. In this pathway analysis by AltAnalyze, gene sets of GO biological process were used. Numbers shown at the top of bars are percentage of detected genes in each gene set. c Bar plot shows significantly changed pathways with p value less than 0.05 and adjusted p value less than 0.25. In this pathway analysis, only immune-related gene sets (Supplementary Table 3) were used. A total of 65 genes from these significantly changed pathways, including pathway “immune system process” (b), are annotated on the left of the bar plot showing gene expression change (green dot) and their location (gray square) in each pathway. Twenty-two (in red) of the 65 genes showed significant downregulation (in orange) in KrasG12V mouse lung tumors with Sox9-high expression. d Sox9 expression in KrasG12V mouse lung tumors (T). In comparison with lung normal tissues (N), three tumors were defined as mSox9-high (in red) and three defined as mSox9-low (in blue). One tumor (in gray) between mSox9-high and mSox9-low was not included. The mSox9-high and mSox9-low tumors were used to check the 65 gene expression (c). 1424950_at and 1451538_at are two different Affymetrix probes to detect Sox9 expression.

SOX9 is significantly associated with suppression of tumor immunity in LUAD

Based on the observed suppression of immune signatures, we performed subcutaneous transplantation using Sox9-overexpressing and Sox9-knockout mouse-derived lung tumor cells in NOD-SCID-gamma (NSG) mice, lacking mature T, NK and B cells [38]. Although mSox9OE increased and Sox9 knockout decreased tumor volumes in NSG mice, the tumor growth differences were much more substantial in immunocompetent C57BL/6J mice (around twofold change) than in the immunocompromised NSG mice (Fig. 4a, Fig. S2b, c). These data suggested that SOX9 might contribute to resistance to anti-tumor immunity.

Fig. 4. Suppression of CD8+ T cells, NK cells and dendritic cells in Sox9-upregulated mouse lung tumors.

Fig. 4

a Subcutaneous transplantation of mTC11 Sox9-overexpressed cell lines in C57BL/6J and NSG mice. 1 × 105 cells were injected subcutaneously. b Representative dot plots demonstrating the decrease of CD8+ T cells, increased LAG3+ cells and decreased proliferation (Ki67) within the CD8+ T cell population. c Proportions of tumor-infiltrating immune cells evaluated by flow cytometry in mTC11-mSox9OE and control (EV) subcutaneous tumors. Tumor-infiltrating immune cell populations whose proportions are significantly changed between mSox9OE and EV subcutaneous tumors are labeled in red. The functional investigations of CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, and Treg cells are labeled by solid lines at x-axis. d Percentages of tumor-infiltrating immune cells normalized to total number of subcutaneous tumor cells. The mean fold change of each tumor-infiltrating immune cell subpopulation (mTC11-EV over mSox9OE) is labeled on the top of the plot. Although most of immune cell subpopulations showed percentage change by comparing EV to mSox9OE, none exhibited significant change with p value less than 0.05. e Selected genes were verified by RT-qPCR in mTC11-mSox9OE and Sox9-knockout subcutaneous tumors. FC: fold change. f Quantification of CD8+ T cells in mTC11-mSox9OE and Sox9-knockout subcutaneous tumors by CD8a IHC staining. g Down-regulation of CD8+ T cell, NK cell, and dendritic cell functional markers in both mTC subcutaneous tumors and KrasG12V mouse lung tumors. Dashed line indicates a fold change of 1.5. h Collagen staining in KSf/f and KSw/w lung tumors using Picro-Sirius Red. The neighboring sections can be found in Fig. 1i to visualize SOX9 expression and tumor grade.

To better understand SOX9-related immune suppression, we performed flow cytometric analysis of T cells, B cells, NK cells, neutrophils, monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells in mTC11-EV and mSox9OE syngeneic allografts (Supplementary Table 5). We also investigated immune cell subtypes (naïve, memory and effector) and their functions (exhaustion markers PD-L1, LAG3 and Tim3, and cell proliferation) within the CD8+, CD4+ T cell and T regulatory cell populations. As shown in Fig. 4b, c, overexpression of Sox9 caused a significant decrease in tumor infiltrating T cells (p = 0.030). Within the T-cell population, we noted that the percentage of CD8+ T cells was significantly decreased (p = 0.025) in mSox9OE tumors. These tumor infiltrated CD8+ T cells expressed more exhaustion marker LAG3 (p = 0.014) and less proliferative marker Ki67 (p = 0.050), which indicate they were in more exhausted states and had weaker proliferative capability in mSox9OE tumors. We did not observe significant differential expression of LAG3 or Ki67 in CD4+ T cells or T regulatory cells. In addition, we normalized the percentages of immune cell sub-populations to the whole tumor (Fig. 4d). In the mSox9OE tumors, CD45+ immune cells were decreased 2.2-fold, and T cell subpopulations showed the largest decrease, especially CD8+ T cells (6.4-fold decrease). We verified the decreased CD8+ cell infiltration in Sox9 overexpressed lung tumors by both CD8a RT-qPCR and IHC, which were both statistically significant (Fig. 4e, f). We further assessed representative genes for CD8+ T cells (Zap70 and Btla), NK cells (Nkg7 and Ncam1), and M1 macrophages (Tnf and Nos2) by RT-qPCR in Sox9-overexpressed and Sox9-knockout tumors. In addition, we examined functional markers of CD8+ T cells, NK cells and dendritic cells in the subcutaneous tumors and KrasG12V mouse lung tumors (Fig. 4g, Supplementary Table 4). All these genes showed an inversely correlated association with Sox9 (Fig. 4e, g). To confirm our observations that SOX9 induces immunosuppression, we performed immunoprofiling on mTC11-Sox9 knockout subcutaneous tumors. Loss of Sox9 significantly increased tumor immune cell infiltration (Fig. S4a, b). CD8+ effector T cells and CD80+ dendritic cells were significantly increased in Sox9-knockout tumors (Fig. S4b, c, d). Thus, flow cytometry along with RNA-seq, RT-qPCR, and IHC confirmed that SOX9 suppresses anti-tumor immunity in Kras-driven mouse LUAD.

Recent studies have established that the chemokine receptor CXCR3 plays a dominant role facilitating CD8+ T cells across tumor vessels and infiltrating into the tumors [39, 40]. CXCR3 ligand CXCL9 has been demonstrated to be downregulated in tumors lacking a CD8+ T cell infiltrate [41]. CXCR6 signaling can also increase retention of memory CD8+ T cells in the tumor microenvironment [42]. We noticed that Cxcl9 and Cxcr6 levels were significantly lower in Sox9-overexpressed tumors. Therefore, we assessed the expression of Cxcl9, its receptor Cxcr3, Cxcr6 and its ligand Cxcl16, and confirmed SOX9-related suppression of these genes in allografts (Fig. 4e, g). Lower abundance of Cxcr3 and Cxcr6 is likely correlated with lower CD8+ T cell infiltrate in the Sox9 overexpressing tumors. Since dendritic cells also secret chemokines and a developmentally important gene of dendritic cells, Flt3 [43], was significantly downregulated (Fig. 3c), we evaluated the function of dendritic cells by Flt3 and Itgae (CD103), and found suppressed expression of both in the allografts (Fig. 4e, g). These findings suggest a potential mechanism whereby SOX9 upregulation inhibits tumor infiltrating dendritic cells and subsequently suppresses CD8+ T cells and NK cells.

To test for a cell intrinsic regulation of the immune suppression, we examined expression of the immune-related genes in mTC11 cells, in which Sox9 overexpressed or knocked out, that were cultured in vitro. Except for Ncam1, the immune-related gene expressions were not detectable or not significantly changed (Fig. S3c), indicating that the observed immune suppression is likely regulated by a SOX9-related tumor microenvironment rather than the tumor cells.

We next examined if altered tumor matrix stiffness and tumor associated angiogenesis contribute to SOX9-induced immune suppression. As previously reported, Stc1 is involved in cancer cell proliferation [44], tumor associated angiogenesis [45] and tumor immune resistance [46]. Gprc5b is a hallmark of Kras signaling, and it promotes cell proliferation and collagen production [47]. Col2a1 [48], Col4a5 [49] and Trf [50] are involved in extracellular matrix pathway and increase cell proliferation. Notably, these genes were significantly upregulated in mSox9OE tumors (Supplementary Table 1). We selected them for RT-qPCR validation in both mSox9OE and Sox9-knockout subcutaneous tumors, together with Igfbp5, Fosl1 and Bcl2 (from cell proliferation pathway, Fig. 3b, Supplementary Table 2) as references. We found that all these collagen-related genes were positively correlated with Sox9 expression (Fig. 4e, Fig. S3d), suggesting that SOX9 enhances lung tumor stiffness. These genes were likely intrinsic to the tumor cells because they were correlated with Sox9 expression in vitro as well (Fig. S3c, d). We performed collagen staining in KSf/f and KSw/w lung tumors, and SOX9+ tumors had abundant collagen fibers whereas SOX9− tumors had no to very low collagen fibers (Fig. 4h). These data consistently demonstrate that SOX9 increases collagen production in LUAD, facilitating a tumor microenvironment with increased tumor stiffness that is known to inhibit anti-tumor immunity.

SOX9 is significantly associated with immune suppression in human LUAD

To test if SOX9 has immunosuppressive function in human lung cancer, we explored immune signatures in human LUAD with SOX9 high (top 20%) and low (lower 15%) using a CIBERSORT dataset [51]. We observed significantly fewer CD8+ T cells, NK cells, plasma cells, as well as more macrophages and memory CD4+ T cells in SOX9-high LUAD tumors (Fig. 5a, Supplementary Table 6). To test if the immunosuppressive effects of SOX9 are independent of mutant KRAS, we performed CIBERSORT analysis on the KRAS-wildtype LUAD subset, and the results were identical, except for CD4+ T cells (Supplementary Table 6). We validated these data by IHC analysis of CD8+ T cells in 23 unselected human LUAD specimens and found that SOX9+ LUAD had significantly less infiltration of CD8+ T cells (Fig. 5b, c). Thus, SOX9 suppresses CD8+ T cells in human LUAD. We also performed CIBERSORT analysis in 32 additional human cancers and observed a significant association between high SOX9 expression and CD8+ T cell suppression in 3 additional cancers, Glioblastoma Multiforme, Sarcoma and Thyroid Carcinoma (Supplementary Table 6), suggesting the immunosuppressive effects of SOX9 extend to other cancer types but are not universal. To examine if the functions of CD8+ T cells, NK cells and dendritic cells are suppressed in SOX9-high tumors in human LUAD, we investigated their functional markers using a single cell RNA-seq dataset (GSE131907) [52]. Based on the percentages of SOX9+ epithelial cells over total epithelial cells in each tumor, we defined the top 3 as SOX9-high and the lower 3 as SOX9-low tumors (Fig. S5). For CD8+ T cells, we found that functional markers GZMA, GNLY, IFNG, CD44 and CD69 were significantly downregulated in SOX9-high tumors (Fig. 5d). Similarly, dendritic cells and NK cells from SOX9-high tumors showed a significant downregulation of the functional markers CD80/CD86/LAMP3 (Fig. 5e) and GNLY/KLRD1 (Fig. 5f), respectively. Therefore, in human LUAD, upregulation of SOX9 results in decreased immune cell infiltration as well as suppression of CD8+ T cell, NK cell and dendritic cell functions in the tumor microenvironment.

Fig. 5. Suppression of CD8+ T cells, NK cells and dendritic cells in SOX9-upregulated human LUAD tumors.

Fig. 5

a Box plot shows the proportions of 22 tumor-infiltrating immune cell populations in human SOX9-high (in red) and SOX9-low (in gray) LUAD samples based CIBERSORT analysis. b Representative CD8 IHC staining in SOX9− and SOX9+ LUAD samples. c Quantification of CD8+ T cells in SOX9− and SOX9+ LUAD samples. Ten samples showed relatively even distribution of SOX9+ cells in the tumors, with percentage of SOX9+ cells from 7.38–61.75% and were defined as SOX9+ LUAD. Thirteen samples were defined as SOX9− LUAD with percentage of SOX9+ cells ranging from 0 to 5%. The p value was calculated by one-tailed t test. d–f Investigation of functional markers of CD8+ T cells (d), dendritic cells (e) and NK cells (f) in human LUAD samples (GSE131907). SOX9-high and -low LUAD samples were defined based on the percentage of SOX9+ epithelial cells over total epithelial cells in each sample (see Supplementary Fig. S5).

DISCUSSION

SOX9 is upregulated in multiple cancer types and is significantly associated with high tumor grade and poorer overall survival in human LUAD [18, 34]. However, evidence that SOX9 is a driver of lung tumor development and progression was not established before now. We generated two KrasLSL-G12D mouse LUAD models with or without Sox9 to directly determine its role in lung tumorigenesis. We found that Sox9 is not only mainly overexpressed in high-grade tumors, but that loss of Sox9 significantly decreases the number of tumors, the fraction of high-grade tumors and overall tumor burden. Genetic loss of Sox9 significantly increases overall survival in the KrasLSL-G12D mouse LUAD model. The results suggest that SOX9 actively promotes tumor progression from low to high grade and drives lung tumor growth. SOX9 likely also promotes tumor initiation since significantly fewer tumors were observed with loss of Sox9, although this will require additional studies to confirm.

SOX9+ tumors showed significantly higher cell proliferation in the KrasG12D mouse LUAD models. Although neither overexpression nor knockout of Sox9 in harvested KrasG12D mouse lung tumor cells affected cell proliferation in the traditional 2D culture model, they had profound effects on cell proliferation in both 3D organoid cultures and subcutaneous allograft systems. Sox9-upregulated cell proliferation was confirmed through RNA-seq analysis and further verified by RT-qPCR. Therefore, we conclude that SOX9 is a driver of lung tumor growth at least partly through increased cell proliferation. Moreover, these data suggest that SOX9-promoted cell proliferation is likely dependent on the tumor microenvironment. In contrast, a rare population of SOX9+ cells in medulloblastoma are responsible for tumor dormancy in the setting of therapy resistance [53]. It would be interesting to test if a rare population of SOX9+ LUAD cells are also quiescent or if SOX9’s involvement in dormancy is cancer type specific.

We found that Sox9 and SOX9 are significantly associated with immune suppression signatures in mouse and human lung tumors, respectively. This is in contrast with two previous studies which suggested that SOX9 has a role in promoting an immune response, but these reports were on non-cancer cells, or in tumor types in which SOX9 acts as a tumor suppressor [54, 55]. The discrepancy is likely due to differences in the tissue-dependent microenvironment and the well-known cell-type specificity of SOX9. SOX9 is rarely expressed in immune cells [56]. Thus, the immune suppression within the tumor microenvironment of Sox9 overexpressing tumors is likely a consequence of tumor cell-specific signatures and/or an altered tumor microenvironment. Tumor-associated extracellular matrix regulates immune cell infiltration and function besides promoting cancer cell growth and invasion. A high density of extracellular matrix inhibits T-lymphocyte infiltration and decreases cytotoxicity and proliferation of resident T cells [57, 58]. Through RNA-seq pathway analysis, we found three extracellular matrix-related genes, Col2a1, Col4a5 and Trf, to be upregulated by SOX9. In addition, Gprc5b, a cell proliferation gene, was reported to promote collagen production and cause tissue hardening [47]. These genes are predicted SOX9 targets [59], and all were consistently upregulated in Sox9 overexpressed subcutaneous tumors and downregulated in Sox9 knockouts. We further found that collagen fibers were more abundant in SOX9+ tumors, indicating that Sox9 regulates tumor-associated extracellular matrix density. Additionally, we found that Stc1 is significantly regulated by SOX9. As a secreted hormone, Stc1 was found to modulate endothelial cell function and attenuate trans-endothelial migration of macrophages and T lymphocytes [45]. In addition, Stc1 is highly expressed in cancer cells, which then impairs phagocytosis of cancer cells as well as antigen processing and presentation, and finally confers anti-tumor immune resistance [46]. These lines of evidence support the feasibility that a SOX9-regulated tumor microenvironment may suppress immune cell infiltration and T cell function.

Immune cell infiltration in solid tumors is controlled by their directed migration towards gradients of chemokines. CXCR3 and CXCR4 can direct T and NK cell migration into solid tumors [60]. We observed that CXCR3 is significantly lower in SOX9 overexpressing tumors. CXCR3 has three ligands, CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 [61]. Among these three ligands, CXCL9 has the highest correlation with CD8+ T cell infiltration across different cancer types including lung cancer [62]. Our findings of lower Cxcl9 expression in SOX9 overexpressing tumors may be one cause of the attenuated CD8+ T cell infiltration in these tumors. CXCL9 can be secreted by a wide variety of cells including macrophages, endothelial cells, fibroblasts, and cancer cells in response to IFN-γ and TNF-α [63]. It is plausible that elevated tumor stiffness in SOX9-overexpressed tumors leads to fewer infiltration of CXCL9 secreting myeloid cells, such as proinflammatory macrophages and dendritic cells. Tumor-derived dendritic cells are required for CD8+ T cell priming [64]. In mouse and human SOX9-high LUAD tumors, we found the functional suppression of dendritic cells, indicated by upregulation of the markers CD103, CD80, CD86 and LAMP3. The suppressed dendritic cells might also cause the decreased CD8+ T cell infiltration.

We show that SOX9 upregulation causes a functional suppression of CD8+ T cells. RNA-seq and RT-qPCR validation showed that Btla and Zap70 were negatively associated with Sox9 expression. Based on previous studies [65–67], Zap70 is indispensable for the maturation and activation of T cells. In addition, CD8+BTLA+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) displayed improved survival following the killing of a tumor target while CD8+BTLA− TILs could not control tumor growth in vivo [68]. This suggests that BTLA downregulation decreases CD8+ T cell function. In an investigation of the functional suppression of CD8+ T cells caused by SOX9 expression, the functional markers, GZMA, GNLY, IFNG, CD44 and CD69, showed significant downregulation in human SOX9-high LUAD tumors. Although further studies are required, the observed downregulation of CD8+ T cell functional genes suggests SOX9 suppresses CD8+ T cell function.

Besides CD8+ T cells, our RNA-seq data also showed NK cell suppression, reflected by downregulation of Nkg7 and Klrd1. Moreover, the functional markers of NK cells, GNLY and KLRD1, were significantly downregulated in SOX9-high human LUAD tumors, indicating a functional suppression of NK cells in SOX9-upregulated tumors. On the other hand, we found that Ncam1 is negatively associated with Sox9 expression. We posit that Ncam1 was directly downregulated by SOX9 within the tumor cells themselves due to the observed downregulation of Ncam1 in both 2D cultured cells and subcutaneous tumors. Loss of Ncam1 expression was previously shown to facilitate cancer cells escape of NK cell immunity [69], consistent with a recent study that SOX9 expression in cancer confers resistance to NK-cell-mediated killing [70]. These results suggest a mechanism whereby SOX9 might confer cancer cell resistance to NK-cell-killing through Ncam1 downregulation.

Taken together, our findings demonstrate that loss of Sox9 increases overall survival in mutant KRAS-induced lung cancer, and SOX9 upregulation promotes KrasG12D lung cancer progression at least partly through increasing cancer cell proliferation, altering tumor stiffness and suppressing the immune response, particularly CD8+ T cells. Overall, SOX9 expression in LUAD tumor cells likely mediates an interactive relationship between lineage-determining transcriptional programs and cellular immune vulnerabilities during LUAD progression. Our future studies will focus on revealing the mechanisms driving SOX9-induced lung cancer progression and immunosuppression. Such studies could lead to better understanding of cellular crosstalk for identifying potential molecular targets for cancer therapies including immunotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Lentiviral production, cells and cell culture, and animal studies

Detailed information on lentiviral production, cell culture and the accompanying experimental conditions in animals can be found in the Supplementary information.

Mouse tumor organoid culture and image analysis

Mouse 3D organoid cultures were performed as described [71] with some modifications. Cells were suspended in cold complete medium at 250 cells/μl, and then mixed with Matrigel (Corning, 356237) at ratio 1:4 on ice. We dropped 10 μl of the cell/Matrigel into each well in 24-well plate (Greiner Bio-one, 662102) in triplicates and incubated at 37 °C. After 20 min, 800 μl of complete medium were added and changed every 2 days. The tumor organoids were imaged under ×4 magnification with bright-field microscope and organoid size was evaluated with function “morphological segmentation” of plugins “MorphoLibJ” in ImageJ1.52a.

Histology, immunohistochemistry and image analysis

Details related to preparation of tissues, methods for immunohistochemistry and analysis of images can be found in the Supplementary information.

Supplementary methods

Additional experimental procedures including RNA-seq and analysis, real-time quantitative PCR and flow cytometry are available in the Supplementary information.

Statistical tests

In this study, statistical tests were performed using R or GraphPad Prism. We evaluated the normality of the samples using a Normality and Lognormality test. For the normally distributed data, two-tailed t test was used or ordinary two-way ANOVA was performed to compare two datasets. For the data that were not normally distributed, we used the two-tailed Mann–Whitney test to compare two datasets. P values <= 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Data are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). All experiments were repeated at least twice to confirm the repeatability, and each group had at least 3 biological replicates (specified in figure panels). For the statistical analysis of the RNA-seq data, it was described in the supplementary methods.

Supplementary Material

Table S2
Table S4
Table S3
Table S5
Tables S6
Tables S7
Table S1
Supp Methods and Figures

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Jia Peng for suggestions and discussions. We thank the Wenwei Hu laboratory for help with tissue sectioning and imaging. We thank Gina Castellano and Samantha Grabler for maintaining NSG mice for subcutaneous transplantation. We thank Lucyann Franciosa and Shafiq Bhat from CINJ histology laboratory for IHC staining. We thank Joshua Vieth and Shashi Sharma from the CINJ Immune Monitoring & Advanced Genomics core facility for the flow cytometry assay. Services and results in support of this research project were generated by the Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey Histopathology and Immune Monitoring Shared Resources, supported, in part, with funding from NCI P30CA072720-5919. This work was supported by NCI R01CA190578 (SRP), R01CA237347-01A1 (JYG) and ACS 134036-RSG-19-165-01-TBG (JYG).

Footnotes

Supplementary information The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-023-02715-5.

COMPETING INTERESTS

The authors declare no competing interest.

DATA AVAILABILITY

The datasets generated during this study can be accessed here: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.20810164.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Jo A, Denduluri S, Zhang B, Wang Z, Yin L, Yan Z, et al. The versatile functions of Sox9 in development, stem cells, and human diseases. Genes Dis. 2014;1:149–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lefebvre V, Angelozzi M, Haseeb A. SOX9 in cartilage development and disease. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2019;61:39–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Haseeb A, Kc R, Angelozzi M, de Charleroy C, Rux D, Tower RJ, et al. SOX9 keeps growth plates and articular cartilage healthy by inhibiting chondrocyte dedifferentiation/osteoblastic redifferentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2021;118:e2019152118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rockich BE, Hrycaj SM, Shih HP, Nagy MS, Ferguson MA, Kopp JL, et al. Sox9 plays multiple roles in the lung epithelium during branching morphogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:E4456–4464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Akiyama H, Chaboissier MC, Martin JF, Schedl A, de Crombrugghe B. The transcription factor Sox9 has essential roles in successive steps of the chondrocyte differentiation pathway and is required for expression of Sox5 and Sox6. Genes Dev. 2002;16:2813–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Akiyama H, Kim JE, Nakashima K, Balmes G, Iwai N, Deng JM, et al. Osteo-chondroprogenitor cells are derived from Sox9 expressing precursors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:14665–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Guven A, Kalebic N, Long KR, Florio M, Vaid S, Brandl H, et al. Extracellular matrix-inducing Sox9 promotes both basal progenitor proliferation and gliogenesis in developing neocortex. Elife. 2020;9:e49808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Seymour PA, Freude KK, Tran MN, Mayes EE, Jensen J, Kist R, et al. SOX9 is required for maintenance of the pancreatic progenitor cell pool. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:1865–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Foster JW, Dominguez-Steglich MA, Guioli S, Kwok C, Weller PA, Stevanovic M, et al. Campomelic dysplasia and autosomal sex reversal caused by mutations in an SRY-related gene. Nature. 1994;372:525–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wagner T, Wirth J, Meyer J, Zabel B, Held M, Zimmer J, et al. Autosomal sex reversal and campomelic dysplasia are caused by mutations in and around the SRY-related gene SOX9. Cell. 1994;79:1111–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Barrionuevo F, Bagheri-Fam S, Klattig J, Kist R, Taketo MM, Englert C, et al. Homozygous inactivation of Sox9 causes complete XY sex reversal in mice. Biol Reprod. 2006;74:195–201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ruan H, Hu S, Zhang H, Du G, Li X, Li X, et al. Upregulated SOX9 expression indicates worse prognosis in solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2017;8:113163–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Aguilar-Medina M, Avendano-Felix M, Lizarraga-Verdugo E, Bermudez M, Romero-Quintana JG, Ramos-Payan R, et al. SOX9 stem-cell factor: clinical and functional relevance in cancer. J Oncol. 2019;2019:6754040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Panda M, Tripathi SK, Biswal BK. SOX9: An emerging driving factor from cancer progression to drug resistance. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2021;1875:188517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wang HY, Lian P, Zheng PS. SOX9, a potential tumor suppressor in cervical cancer, transactivates p21WAF1/CIP1 and suppresses cervical tumor growth. Oncotarget. 2015;6:20711–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Passeron T, Valencia JC, Namiki T, Vieira WD, Passeron H, Miyamura Y, et al. Upregulation of SOX9 inhibits the growth of human and mouse melanomas and restores their sensitivity to retinoic acid. J Clin Invest. 2009;119:954–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zhou H, Qin Y, Ji S, Ling J, Fu J, Zhuang Z, et al. SOX9 activity is induced by oncogenic Kras to affect MDC1 and MCMs expression in pancreatic cancer. Oncogene. 2018;37:912–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Capaccione KM, Hong X, Morgan KM, Liu W, Bishop JM, Liu L, et al. Sox9 mediates Notch1-induced mesenchymal features in lung adenocarcinoma. Oncotarget. 2014;5:3636–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ling S, Chang X, Schultz L, Lee TK, Chaux A, Marchionni L, et al. An EGFR-ERK-SOX9 signaling cascade links urothelial development and regeneration to cancer. Cancer Res. 2011;71:3812–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Song S, Ajani JA, Honjo S, Maru DM, Chen Q, Scott AW, et al. Hippo coactivator YAP1 upregulates SOX9 and endows esophageal cancer cells with stem-like properties. Cancer Res. 2014;74:4170–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Schmidlin CJ, Zeng T, Liu P, Wei Y, Dodson M, Chapman E, et al. Chronic arsenic exposure enhances metastatic potential via NRF2-mediated upregulation of SOX9. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2020;402:115138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhang S, Che D, Yang F, Chi C, Meng H, Shen J, et al. Tumor-associated macrophages promote tumor metastasis via the TGF-beta/SOX9 axis in non-small cell lung cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8:99801–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hong X, Liu W, Song R, Shah JJ, Feng X, Tsang CK, et al. SOX9 is targeted for proteasomal degradation by the E3 ligase FBW7 in response to DNA damage. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:8855–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Shao N, Huang H, Idris M, Peng X, Xu F, Dong S, et al. KEAP1 Mutations Drive Tumorigenesis by Suppressing SOX9 Ubiquitination and Degradation. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2020;7:2001018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Luanpitpong S, Li J, Manke A, Brundage K, Ellis E, McLaughlin SL, et al. SLUG is required for SOX9 stabilization and functions to promote cancer stem cells and metastasis in human lung carcinoma. Oncogene. 2016;35:2824–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Suryo Rahmanto A, Savov V, Brunner A, Bolin S, Weishaupt H, Malyukova A, et al. FBW7 suppression leads to SOX9 stabilization and increased malignancy in medulloblastoma. EMBO J. 2016;35:2192–212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Huang JQ, Wei FK, Xu XL, Ye SX, Song JW, Ding PK, et al. SOX9 drives the epithelial-mesenchymal transition in non-small-cell lung cancer through the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway. J Transl Med. 2019;17:143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tripathi SK, Biswal BK. SOX9 promotes epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance via targeting beta-catenin and epithelial to mesenchymal transition in lung cancer. Life Sci. 2021;277:119608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tripathi SK, Sahoo RK, Biswal BK. SOX9 as an emerging target for anticancer drugs and a prognostic biomarker for cancer drug resistance. Drug Discov Today. 2022;27:2541–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Cancer Genome Atlas Research N. Comprehensive molecular profiling of lung adenocarcinoma. Nature. 2014;511:543–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Jiang SS, Fang WT, Hou YH, Huang SF, Yen BL, Chang JL, et al. Upregulation of SOX9 in lung adenocarcinoma and its involvement in the regulation of cell growth and tumorigenicity. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:4363–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kopp JL, von Figura G, Mayes E, Liu FF, Dubois CL, Morris JPt, et al. Identification of Sox9-dependent acinar-to-ductal reprogramming as the principal mechanism for initiation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Cell. 2012;22:737–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Grimm D, Bauer J, Wise P, Kruger M, Simonsen U, Wehland M, et al. The role of SOX family members in solid tumours and metastasis. Semin Cancer Biol. 2020;67:122–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zhou CH, Ye LP, Ye SX, Li Y, Zhang XY, Xu XY, et al. Clinical significance of SOX9 in human non-small cell lung cancer progression and overall patient survival. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2012;31:18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sanchez-Rivera FJ, Papagiannakopoulos T, Romero R, Tammela T, Bauer MR, Bhutkar A, et al. Rapid modelling of cooperating genetic events in cancer through somatic genome editing. Nature. 2014;516:428–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Jackson EL, Olive KP, Tuveson DA, Bronson R, Crowley D, Brown M, et al. The differential effects of mutant p53 alleles on advanced murine lung cancer. Cancer Res. 2005;65:10280–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ambrogio C, Gomez-Lopez G, Falcone M, Vidal A, Nadal E, Crosetto N, et al. Combined inhibition of DDR1 and Notch signaling is a therapeutic strategy for KRAS-driven lung adenocarcinoma. Nat Med. 2016;22:270–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Shultz LD, Lyons BL, Burzenski LM, Gott B, Chen X, Chaleff S, et al. Human lymphoid and myeloid cell development in NOD/LtSz-scid IL2R gamma null mice engrafted with mobilized human hemopoietic stem cells. J Immunol. 2005;174:6477–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Mikucki ME, Fisher DT, Matsuzaki J, Skitzki JJ, Gaulin NB, Muhitch JB, et al. Non-redundant requirement for CXCR3 signalling during tumoricidal T-cell trafficking across tumour vascular checkpoints. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Spranger S, Dai D, Horton B, Gajewski TF. Tumor-Residing Batf3 Dendritic Cells Are Required for Effector T Cell Trafficking and Adoptive T Cell Therapy. Cancer Cell. 2017;31:711–23 e714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Harlin H, Meng Y, Peterson AC, Zha Y, Tretiakova M, Slingluff C, et al. Chemokine expression in melanoma metastases associated with CD8+ T-cell recruitment. Cancer Res. 2009;69:3077–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Muthuswamy R, McGray AR, Battaglia S, He W, Miliotto A, Eppolito C, et al. CXCR6 by increasing retention of memory CD8(+) T cells in the ovarian tumor micro-environment promotes immunosurveillance and control of ovarian cancer. J Immunother Cancer. 2021;9:e003329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Waskow C, Liu K, Darrasse-Jeze G, Guermonprez P, Ginhoux F, Merad M, et al. The receptor tyrosine kinase Flt3 is required for dendritic cell development in peripheral lymphoid tissues. Nat Immunol. 2008;9:676–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Wang Y, Qi Z, Zhou M, Yang W, Hu R, Li G, et al. Stanniocalcin1 promotes cell proliferation, chemoresistance and metastasis in hypoxic gastric cancer cells via Bcl2. Oncol Rep. 2019;41:1998–2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Chakraborty A, Brooks H, Zhang P, Smith W, McReynolds MR, Hoying JB, et al. Stanniocalcin-1 regulates endothelial gene expression and modulates transendothelial migration of leukocytes. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2007;292:F895–904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lin H, Kryczek I, Li S, Green MD, Ali A, Hamasha R, et al. Stanniocalcin 1 is a phagocytosis checkpoint driving tumor immune resistance. Cancer Cell. 2021;39:480–93 e486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Takizawa N, Hironaka T, Mae K, Ueno T, Horii Y, Nagasaka A, et al. GPRC5B promotes collagen production in myofibroblasts. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2021;561:180–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ricard-Blum S The collagen family. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2011;3:a004978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Xiao Q, Jiang Y, Liu Q, Yue J, Liu C, Zhao X, et al. Minor type IV collagen alpha5 chain promotes cancer progression through discoidin domain receptor-1. PLoS Genet. 2015;11:e1005249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Skinner SJ, Somervell CE, Buch S, Post M. Transferrin gene expression and transferrin immunolocalization in developing foetal rat lung. J Cell Sci. 1991;99:651–6. Pt 3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Thorsson V, Gibbs DL, Brown SD, Wolf D, Bortone DS, Ou Yang TH, et al. The immune landscape of cancer. Immunity. 2018;48:812–830 e814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kim N, Kim HK, Lee K, Hong Y, Cho JH, Choi JW, et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing demonstrates the molecular and cellular reprogramming of metastatic lung adenocarcinoma. Nat Commun. 2020;11:2285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Borgenvik A, Holmberg KO, Bolin S, Zhao M, Savov V, Rosén G, et al. Dormant SOX9-Positive Cells Facilitate MYC-Driven Recurrence of Medulloblastoma. Cancer Research. 2022;82:4586–603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Scharf GM, Kilian K, Cordero J, Wang Y, Grund A, Hofmann M, et al. Inactivation of Sox9 in fibroblasts reduces cardiac fibrosis and inflammation. JCI Insight. 2019;4:e126721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ashkenazi S, Ortenberg R, Besser M, Schachter J, Markel G. SOX9 indirectly regulates CEACAM1 expression and immune resistance in melanoma cells. Oncotarget. 2016;7:30166–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Heng TS, Painter MW. Immunological Genome Project C. The Immunological Genome Project: networks of gene expression in immune cells. Nat Immunol. 2008;9:1091–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Kuczek DE, Larsen AMH, Thorseth ML, Carretta M, Kalvisa A, Siersbaek MS, et al. Collagen density regulates the activity of tumor-infiltrating T cells. J Immunother Cancer. 2019;7:68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Gordon-Weeks A, Yuzhalin AE. Cancer extracellular matrix proteins regulate tumour immunity. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12:3331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Nishiyama A, Xin L, Sharov AA, Thomas M, Mowrer G, Meyers E, et al. Uncovering early response of gene regulatory networks in ESCs by systematic induction of transcription factors. Cell Stem Cell. 2009;5:420–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Kohli K, Pillarisetty VG, Kim TS. Key chemokines direct migration of immune cells in solid tumors. Cancer Gene Ther. 2022;29:10–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Schulz O, Hammerschmidt SI, Moschovakis GL, Forster R. Chemokines and chemokine receptors in lymphoid tissue dynamics. Annu Rev Immunol. 2016;34:203–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Dangaj D, Bruand M, Grimm AJ, Ronet C, Barras D, Duttagupta PA, et al. Cooperation between constitutive and inducible chemokines enables T cell engraftment and immune attack in solid tumors. Cancer Cell. 2019;35:885–900 e810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Tokunaga R, Zhang W, Naseem M, Puccini A, Berger MD, Soni S, et al. CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11/CXCR3 axis for immune activation - A target for novel cancer therapy. Cancer Treat Rev. 2018;63:40–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Kim CW, Kim KD, Lee HK. The role of dendritic cells in tumor microenvironments and their uses as therapeutic targets. BMB Rep. 2021;54:31–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Weiss A T cell antigen receptor signal transduction: a tale of tails and cytoplasmic protein-tyrosine kinases. Cell. 1993;73:209–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Elder ME, Lin D, Clever J, Chan AC, Hope TJ, Weiss A, et al. Human severe combined immunodeficiency due to a defect in ZAP-70, a T cell tyrosine kinase. Science. 1994;264:1596–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Palacios EH, Weiss A. Distinct roles for Syk and ZAP-70 during early thymocyte development. J Exp Med. 2007;204:1703–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Ritthipichai K, Haymaker CL, Martinez M, Aschenbrenner A, Yi X, Zhang M, et al. Multifaceted role of BTLA in the Control of CD8(+) T-cell fate after antigen encounter. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23:6151–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Taouk G, Hussein O, Zekak M, Abouelghar A, Al-Sarraj Y, Abdelalim EM, et al. CD56 expression in breast cancer induces sensitivity to natural killer-mediated cytotoxicity by enhancing the formation of cytotoxic immunological synapse. Sci Rep. 2019;9:8756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Laughney AM, Hu J, Campbell NR, Bakhoum SF, Setty M, Lavallee VP, et al. Regenerative lineages and immune-mediated pruning in lung cancer metastasis. Nat Med. 2020;26:259–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Dost AFM, Moye AL, Vedaie M, Tran LM, Fung E, Heinze D, et al. Organoids model transcriptional hallmarks of oncogenic KRAS activation in lung epithelial progenitor cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2020;27:663–678 e668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table S2
Table S4
Table S3
Table S5
Tables S6
Tables S7
Table S1
Supp Methods and Figures

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during this study can be accessed here: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.20810164.

RESOURCES