Abstract
Regulatory T cells (Tregs) establish dominant immune tolerance but obstruct tumor immune surveillance, warranting context-specific mechanistic insights into the functions of tumor-infiltrating Tregs (TIL-Tregs). We show that enhanced posttranslational O-linked N-acetylglucosamine modification (O-GlcNAcylation) of cellular factors is a molecular feature that promotes a tumor-specific gene expression signature and distinguishes TIL-Tregs from their systemic counterparts. We found that altered glucose utilization through the glucose transporter Glut3 is a major facilitator of this process. Treg-specific deletion of Glut3 abrogates tumor immune tolerance, while steady-state immune homeostasis remains largely unaffected in mice. Furthermore, by employing mouse tumor models and human clinical data, we identified the NF-κB subunit c-Rel as one such factor that, through Glut3-dependent O-GlcNAcylation, functionally orchestrates gene expression in Tregs at tumor sites. Together, these results not only identify immunometabolic alterations and molecular events contributing to fundamental aspects of Treg biology, specifically at tumor sites but also reveal tumor-specific cellular properties that can aid in the development of Treg-targeted cancer immunotherapies.
Keywords: Regulatory T cells, Treg, Glut3, O-GlcNAcylation, Treg metabolism
Subject terms: Immune evasion, Tumour immunology, Cancer microenvironment
Introduction
Regulatory T cells (Tregs) are vital for establishing dominant immune tolerance. However, in contrast to their beneficial effects on inflammation, due to their inherent immunoregulatory properties, Treg cells impede antitumor immune responses and are well recognized targets with enormous therapeutic potential in cancer immunotherapy [1, 2]. Indeed, when Treg cells are punctually depleted with diphtheria toxin (DT) treatment, in a genetically engineered Foxp3IRES-GFP-DTR mouse strain at the time of tumor inoculation, a significant reduction in tumor growth and metastasis results [3, 4]. Furthermore, depletion of Tregs along with an anti-OVA vaccine has also been reported to enhance the therapeutic effect of the vaccine in DEREG (depletion of regulatory T cells) mice inoculated with OVA-expressing B16 tumor cells [5]. Despite such promising results from ‘proof-of-principle’ experiments, an important conceptual bottleneck for therapeutically targeting Treg cells is that systemic inhibition of Treg function to increase the antitumor response may cause life-threatening autoimmunity. Therefore, identifying the cellular and molecular mechanisms by which Treg cells populating tumors specifically restrict antitumor immune responses is crucial. Targeting such mechanisms that are distinctive for TIL-Tregs and are potentially dispensable for Treg-mediated regulation of systemic immunity may be instrumental in the selective inhibition of intratumoral Treg functions and increase the use of Treg cell-targeting approaches in cancer treatment [6].
The tumor microenvironment (TME) is a nutrient-stressed space that impedes immune cell functions. While effector CD4+ and cytotoxic CD8+ T cells become progressively exhausted in the TME, TIL-Tregs maintain an unusually heightened suppressive phenotype [7]. This finding raises the intriguing possibility of a metabolic switch between resting Tregs and TIL-Tregs for their optimum tumor-specific immunoregulatory functions. In particular, the mechanisms of glucose sensing, uptake, and downstream utilization pathways can potentially be important determinants [7, 8]. Active glucose transport via sodium‒glucose-linked transporters (SGLTs) and facilitative glucose transporters (GLUTs) across the cell membrane are the primary modes of cellular glucose uptake. Among these transporters, GLUT1 (encoded by SLC2A1)-mediated transport has been found to be prominent in T cells [9, 10]. However, the deletion of Slc2a1 did not alter the functional phenotype of Tregs [10]. However, intratumoral Tregs have been shown to take up more glucose than CD4+ effector T cells do [11], which indicates an alternate mode of glucose influx.
GLUT3 (encoded by SLC2A3) is a glucose transporter isoform with predominant functions in neurons and sperm [12]. While GLUT3 is highly expressed in Th17 cells and regulates their pathogenicity, its function in Tregs remains elusive [13]. GLUT3 is considered primarily a neuronal transporter, as its expression was initially found to be limited to neuronal processes. It has consistently been found to have a lower Km and higher Kcat values than its counterparts, which translates to a several-fold higher affinity and transport capacity for glucose [12].
Interestingly, extensive in silico analyses of human cancer datasets, appropriately controlled functional correlation outputs, and expression patterns of Glut3 in intratumoral Treg versus non-Treg compartments in experimental tumor models in mice, taken together, strongly point to a specific role of Glut3 in TIL-Treg-mediated tumor tolerance. In this study, we show that altered glucose utilization through Glut3 facilitates enhanced posttranslational O-GlcNAcylation of cellular factors, a molecular trait that promotes the tumor-specific transcriptome and distinguishes TIL-Tregs from their systemic counterparts. Collectively, our findings reveal that Glut3 critically contributes to shaping the tumor-specific features of Treg cells via posttranslational O-GlcNAcylation of cellular factors, providing potential targets for Treg-targeted anticancer therapies.
Results
Glut3 as a potential candidate with tumor-Treg-specific functional relevance
We investigated the relevance of two T lymphocyte-expressed facilitative glucose transporters, GLUT1 and GLUT3 (encoded by SLC2A1 and SLC2A3, respectively), via in silico methods and analyzed their correlation with Treg and non-Treg infiltration levels across different tumor types. Analysis of the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) human cancer data via TIMER 2.0 (http://timer.cistrome.org) [14] revealed a strong correlation between SLC2A3 expression and Treg infiltration in several queried cancer types. These included skin cutaneous melanoma (SKCM), stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD), and colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) (Fig. S1A, left panel). However, this correlation was lost when we queried for its correlation with CD4+FOXP3- non-Treg infiltration (Fig. S1A, middle panel). No such correlation was observed between SLC2A1 and Treg infiltration in any of these cancer types (Fig. S1A, right panel). Extending this analysis to all 40 different tumor types in the TCGA database via two different algorithms, we established that, across most tumor types, there was a positive correlation specifically between Treg infiltration and SLC2A3 expression (Fig. S1B, C). In concert with these observations from human cancer databases, upon analyzing previously published gene expression data in mouse tumor models [15], we observed a clear trend toward increased Slc2a3 expression in tumor-infiltrated Tregs compared with conventional effector T cells (Fig. S1D). These data are the first indications of a hitherto unexplored role of Glut3 in Tregs, specifically in the context of antitumor immunity.
Specific requirement of Glut3 for Treg-mediated tumor immune tolerance
To elucidate the physiological importance of Glut3 in Tregs, we generated mice harboring the loxP flanked Slc2a3 allele (Slc2a3f/f) and crossed them with Foxp3YFP-Cre mice to delete Slc2a3 specifically in Tregs (Fig. 1A, B). The Slc2a3f/fFoxp3YFP-Cre (hereafter called ‘KO’ and the littermate control Slc2a3+/+Foxp3YFP-Cre mice called ‘WT’) mice did not display any alterations in the total cell frequency of peripheral lymph nodes, mesenteric lymph nodes or the spleen. Non-Treg CD4+Foxp3− T-cell activation and proliferation at the steady-state level, both at young (~8 weeks) and older (~36 weeks) ages, did not change (Fig. 1C, D; and Fig. S2A–C). Additionally, there was no significant difference in inflammatory cytokine production between WT and KO CD4+Foxp3− and CD8+ T cells (Fig. 1E and Fig. S2D, E). Furthermore, we did not observe any differences in Treg frequency, activation, or proliferation or in the frequency of Tregs expressing functional markers such as CD25, CTLA4, GITR, or CD103 (Fig. 1F–H and Fig. S2F, G). In an in vitro suppression assay, KO Tregs were equally as competent as WT Tregs in suppressing the proliferation of CD4+Foxp3− responder T cells (Fig. 1I, J). Therefore, the KO mice did not display any signs of compromised Treg function at steady state.
Fig. 1.
Slc2a3 deletion does not affect the function or homeostasis of Treg cells at steady state or under inflammatory conditions. A Scheme for the generation of the conditional allele of mouse Slc2a3. B IGV tracks showing the expression of loxP flanking exon 2 and exon 3 transcripts in Tregs from Slc2a3+/+Foxp3IRES-Cre (WT) and Slc2a3f/fFoxp3IRES-Cre (KO) mice as analyzed by RNA sequencing. C Cellularity of peripheral lymphoid organs in young (8-week-old) and aged (36-week-old) WT and KO mice. D Tabulation of activated (top) and proliferating (middle) CD4+Foxp3- T cells and proliferating CD8+ T cells (bottom) in the peripheral lymphoid organs of young and aged WT and KO mice. E Frequencies of respective cytokine-producing non-Treg T cells from the peripheral lymphoid organs of young and aged WT and KO animals. F Representative histogram and frequency of Tregs in the peripheral lymphoid organs of young and aged WT and KO animals. G Activation (top) and proliferation (bottom) of Tregs in the peripheral lymphoid organs of young and aged WT and KO mice. H Representative flow cytometry histograms depicting the frequency of Tregs expressing Treg functional markers among KO and WT Tregs. I, J 72 hr in vitro suppression assay with KO and WT Tregs. Representative histograms depicting the proliferation of responder cells (dilution of CTV) (I) and a chart showing the dilution of the CTV MFI in responder cells (J) at different ratios of Treg and responder cells. K Progression of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), as assessed by disease score, in WT and KO mice. L Body weight changes in mice adoptively transferred with Treg cells in a model of T-cell transfer-induced colitis. Rag1-/- recipient mice were subjected to adoptive transfer of CD45RBhi T cells. “WT Tregs” and “KO Tregs” indicate that CD45RBhi T cells were cotransferred with sorted CD4+YFP+ Tregs sorted from WT and KO mice, respectively. “No Tregs” indicates that the recipient mice were adoptively transferred with CD45RBhi T cells alone. The results are pooled from two to three (C‒M) independent experiments. The data are presented as the means ± SDs (C–G and J) and means ± SEMs (K, L). The values on the flow cytometry histograms represent the respective frequencies of the cells (F, H, and I). ns, nonsignificant; P values are derived by unpaired Student’s t test, two-tailed (B–E, I)
To further determine whether Treg-specific deletion of Glut3 has any phenotypic consequences under conditions of inflammation, we employed two different models of autoimmunity. Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) (Fig. 1K and Fig. S3A, B), an animal model of multiple sclerosis, and a T-cell transfer model of colitis (Fig. 1L and Fig. S3C–E) were used. In both cases, the KO Tregs remained equally competent in controlling inflammation as WT Tregs.
However, upon challenge with either B16F10 melanoma or MC38 colon carcinoma, the KO mice displayed significant suppression of tumor growth compared with the WT mice (Fig. 2A and Fig. S3F). To this end, we focused on the B16F10 model to gain insights into the cellular and molecular mechanisms of the phenotype. The compromised tumor growth in the KO mice was accompanied by a tendency toward an increase in the tumor-infiltrating CD8+/CD4+ T-cell ratio (Fig. 2B), as well as a significant increase in the proliferation of CD4+Foxp3− and CD8+ cytotoxic T cells, specifically in the TME and not in the spleen, as evidenced by Ki67 expression (Fig. 2C, D). Furthermore, there was a significant increase in the frequency of IFNγ-producing CD8+ T cells, specifically within tumor-infiltrated lymphocytes (Fig. 2E).
Fig. 2.
Glut3 specifically enhances the protumor response of tumor-infiltrating Tregs and modulates their transcriptomic landscape. A B16F10 melanoma growth in Slc2a3+/+Foxp3IRES-Cre (WT) and Slc2a3f/fFoxp3IRES-Cre (KO) mice. B CD8+/CD4+ T-cell ratios in the spleen (Sp) and tumors (TIL) on day 23 postinoculation in the mice described in (A). C, D Percentages of proliferating (Ki67+) non-Treg CD4+ (C) and CD8+ (D) T cells in the spleens and tumors of the mice described in (A). E Frequency of IFNγ-producing splenic and tumor-infiltrating (TIL) CD8+ T cells in the mice described in (A). F, G Gene ontology analysis of B16F10 melanoma TIL CD8+ T cells and CD4+Foxp3- cells in KO mice. H Differential gene expression (DGE) of select immune response genes in KO TIL CD8+ and CD4+Foxp3- T cells. I Representative FACS plot (top) and frequency (bottom) of splenic and B16F10 melanoma TIL-Tregs in WT and KO mice. J Overall change in gene expression in control and tumor-bearing (TBM) splenic and TIL-Tregs upon Slc2a3 deletion. The numbers within the bar graphs represent the total number of genes affected. K Changes in the expression of representative tumor-infiltrating Treg (TITR) signature gene set genes in the spleen and TIL-Tregs of the KO mice compared with the WT mice. L CDF analysis of TITR signature gene set expression in the spleen and TIL-Tregs of the KO mice. M Heatmap depicting the expression of select NF-κB target genes in TIL-Tregs from WT and KO mice. N KEGG pathway analysis of genes downregulated in KO TIL-Tregs. O CDF analysis of NF-κB target gene set expression in splenic and TIL-Tregs from KO mice compared with WT mice. Changes in the expression of select NF-κB target genes specifically downregulated in KO TBM splenic Tregs. The results are pooled from three (A) or two (B–E, I) independent experiments or are from three pooled samples (J–P). The data are presented as the means ± SEMs (A) and means ± SDs (B–E, I). NE, not expressed. ns, nonsignificant, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001; P values are derived from two-way ANOVA (A), unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test (B–E, I), the Wald test (DESeq2) (H, K, P), and the Kolmogorov‒Smirnov test (L, O)
To comprehensively determine whether Treg-specific deletion of Glut3 results in enhanced T-cell activation within tumor sites, we performed RNA-seq analysis of FACS-sorted tumor-infiltrating CD4+Foxp3− effector T cells and CD8+ cytotoxic T cells from WT and KO mice (Fig. S4A). Since differences in tumor size can influence the intrinsic properties of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes due to an altered TME, for all these and subsequent TIL-Treg-derived RNA-seq experiments described later, we adjusted the tumor inoculation point so that at the time of TIL isolation and analyses, both the WT and KO mice had a tumor volume of ~500 mm3. As expected, according to gene ontology analysis (using the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID 6.8) software package https://david.ncifcrf.gov/home.jsp) of the “biological process”, both CD8+ T and CD4+Foxp3− T cells presented increased differential gene expression (DGE) of T-cell activation-related genes and enrichment of pathways such as ‘adaptive immune response’, ‘inflammatory response’, ‘TCR signaling pathway’, and ‘positive regulation of IFN-γ production’ (Fig. 2F–H). Notably, there was a significant reduction in the expression of Ifngr2 in both CD4+Foxp3− and CD8+ T cells and Tnf in CD8+ T cells. Ifngr2 signaling is largely dispensable for the expansion and differentiation of CD8+ T cells [16]. Furthermore, TNF can lead to activation-induced death of CD8+ T cells [17]. These findings confirmed that the reduction in tumor growth upon Treg-specific depletion of Glut3 was a consequence of enhanced T-cell-mediated antitumor immunity. Consistently, the frequency of intratumoral Tregs but not of splenic Tregs from tumor-bearing mice (henceforth referred to as ‘TBM’) was dramatically lower in the KO animals than in the WT animals (Fig. 2I). This tumor-specific property of Glut3-deficient Treg cells is cell intrinsic, since Glut3-deficient Slc2a3f/fFoxp3YFP-Cre/WT heterozygous female mice, in which, owing to X chromosome inactivation, Glut3-sufficient and deficient Tregs coexist, displayed similar reductions in YFP-Cre+ TIL-Treg frequency compared with their counterparts in Slc2a3+/+Foxp3YFP-Cre/WT littermate controls (Fig. S4B).
Changes in tumor-specific gene expression in Glut3-deficient TIL-Tregs
To determine Glut3-dependent gene expression changes in Tregs, we next analyzed the transcriptomic profiles of WT and KO CD4+YFP+ Tregs isolated from the spleens of unchallenged mice at steady state, TIL-Tregs sorted from tumor sites, and splenic Tregs sorted from TBMs (Fig. S4A, C). We observed a progressive increase in DGE in Tregs ranging from untreated mouse spleens to TBM splenocytes and TIL-Tregs, where TIL-Tregs were the most affected (Fig. 2J). Intriguingly, 696 genes were downregulated (DOWN) more than 1.5-fold, specifically in TIL-Tregs, whereas 218 genes were downregulated in TBM splenic Tregs. Gene ontology analysis revealed that this group included genes related to the ‘immune system process’, ‘chemotaxis’, ‘adaptive immune response’, and ‘innate immune response’, among others. The majority of the upregulated (UP) genes in the TIL-Tregs, on the other hand, included genes involved in ‘translation’ and ribosome assembly, presumably indicating increased stress-related protein synthesis (Fig. S4D, E). Interestingly, although the number of ‘UP’ genes in TIL-Tregs was close to the number of ‘UP’ genes in TBM splenic Tregs, qualitatively, these genes displayed differences in gene ontology, where the ‘UP’ genes in the TBM spleen were related primarily to the ‘cell cycle’, ‘mitotic nuclear division’, ‘cell division’, ‘DNA replication’, etc. (Fig. S4F, G). Notably, we did not observe an increase in the expression of Slc2a1 or any other Glut-encoding genes in Glut3-deficient Tregs compared with WT Tregs upon manual inspection of the RNA-seq data, indicating that the effect of Glut3 deficiency is unlikely to be compensated for by their increased expression in any of the above groups (Fig. S5).
Since the TIL-Treg ‘DOWN’ gene set appeared to be the most relevant group in which immune function-related genes were primarily affected, we next focused on these genes to obtain more mechanistic insights. For this purpose, we utilized data from a recent study in which tumor-infiltrating Treg gene expression profiles from both mouse and human tumors were compared with those from normal lymphoid organs or tissues. In this study, upon comprehensive bioinformatics analyses, a set of 108 tumor-infiltrating Treg ‘signature’ genes (TITR gene set) whose transcriptional profiles are upregulated in TIL-Tregs within all analyzed tumor types in both species was reported [15]. Initial manual investigation revealed that many TIL-Treg ‘DOWN’ genes are among the tumor Treg signatures identified in this study (Fig. 2K). To achieve a more comprehensive understanding, we performed a cumulative distribution function (CDF) analysis of the difference in expression for the entire tumor Treg signature gene set on our RNA-seq data. A left or right shift in the CDF curve compared with the cumulative distribution for all expressed genes indicates that most genes within the gene set analyzed are downregulated or upregulated, respectively. By quantitatively extending the findings from the manual examination, we detected significant downregulation of most of the tumor Treg signature genes in Glut3-deficient TIL-Tregs. On the other hand, no significant change in the expression of this gene set was observed in the splenic Tregs of KO TBM (Fig. 2L).
In addition to the above observations, upon a closer candidate-based investigation of the TIL-Treg ‘DOWN’ group, we noticed several genes that are known transcriptional targets of the NF-κB pathway, which was scarcely observed in other differentially expressed gene set categories (Fig. 2M and numbers in brackets in Fig. S4D upper panel compared with lower panel, and Fig. S4F). Among these genes, several have been reported to be involved in Treg homeostasis and function. Costimulation via the adhesion molecule CD44 has been reported to be important for Treg cell persistence and the production of IL-10 [18]. Indeed, a deficiency in CD44 leads to reduced Treg cell numbers and an exacerbation of EAE in mice [19]. Similarly, the chemokine receptor CCR5 has been implicated in the intratumoral migration and suppressive function of Tregs [20]. Both Btk [21] and Cd86 [22] are associated with aTregs, and agonistic stimulation of cell surface TLR2 leads to the proliferation of Tregs [23]. Subsequent KEGG pathway analysis revealed that NF-κB-mediated signaling is indeed a major downregulated pathway in Glut3-deficient TIL-Tregs (Fig. 2N). To strengthen these observations, CDF analyses of the gene set comprising all known NF-κB target genes (https://www.bu.edu/nf-kb/gene-resources/target-genes/) revealed significant downregulation of NF-κB targets, specifically in Glut3-deficient TIL-Tregs (Fig. 2O). Interestingly, even though unlike TIL-Tregs, TBM splenic Tregs did not show substantial changes in the expression of the majority of NF-κB target genes, some of the candidates of major importance were found to be significantly downregulated in this group. These include Rel itself, which codes for the NF-κB canonical subunit c-Rel; the regulator Nfkbiz; and the well-known NF-κB target JunB (Fig. 2P). Notably, c-Rel and JunB have been previously implicated in Treg homeostasis and effector functions in the context of tumor immunity [24, 25]. Taken together, these findings led to two important conclusions. First, within the tumor microenvironment, molecular events downstream of Glut3 are required to shape the tumor-specific transcriptional signature specific for TIL-Tregs. Second, Glut3-dependent alterations in NF-κB transcriptional activity appear to be important determinants of this process. Notably, we observed that 16 out of the 108 tumor Treg signature genes are also known transcriptional targets of NF-κB, suggesting a probable mechanistic link between them.
Glut3 promotes O-GlcNAcylation in TIL-Tregs
Next, we sought to determine the Glut3-dependent molecular mechanisms by which the gene expression profile of Tregs is shaped in the tumor environment. While highly suppressive and phenotypically activated, TIL-Tregs are technically challenging to isolate in large numbers with intact physiologic identity, a requirement that is necessary to address such mechanistic questions. Therefore, to mimic the TIL-Treg phenotype in vivo, we utilized a previously characterized model of Treg activation [26]. Briefly, it is a system in which two consecutive days of diphtheria toxin (DT) administration in Foxp3IRES-DTR mice results in transient Treg ablation followed by overt immune activation. When DT administration stops, there is a rebound in the proliferation of Tregs in an inflamed environment, making them highly activated with superior suppression capacity [26] (Fig. S6A). Notably, the gene expression profile of these in vivo-activated ‘DT-aTreg’ cells has been previously shown [26] and was also evident from our independently generated RNA-seq data (Fig. S6B) to correlate significantly with the gene expression signature of TIL-Tregs infiltrating established tumors in mice [15]. By bulk RNA-seq experiments, Slc2a3 was found to be highly expressed in DT-aTregs (Fig. S6C). Furthermore, in accordance with the increased expression of Slc2a3, in an adoptive cell transfer-based in vivo 2-NBDG (a surrogate fluorescent glucose analog) uptake assay, we found that the relative glucose uptake capacity of DT-aTregs was greater than that of resting Tregs (Fig. S6D, E). Therefore, throughout this study, we utilized DT-aTregs generated by the Foxp3DTR system to establish hypotheses that were tested in subsequent experiments on TIL-Tregs isolated from tumors.
We performed a metabolomics experiment in which resting Tregs were compared with activated DT-aTregs generated via the Foxp3DTR system. We identified uridine diphosphate N-acetylglucosamine (UDP-GlcNAc) as a metabolite specifically enriched in DT-aTregs (Fig. S7A). UDP-GlcNAc is the end product of the so-called hexosamine biosynthetic pathway (HBP), an alternative glucose utilization pathway that consumes approximately 5% of glucose uptake in normal cells. UDP-GlcNAc serves as the raw material for the biosynthesis of various glycoconjugated cellular factors. For example, O-GlcNAcylation of downstream targets has been shown to be dynamically modulated in cancer, which is a direct consequence of altered functionality of such posttranslationally modified cellular components [27]. Two key enzymes responsible for adding and removing the O-GlcNAc moiety from target proteins are O-GlcNAc transferase (OGT) and O-GlcNAcase (OGA), respectively (Fig. S7B). Interestingly, a GLUT3-dependent increase in O-GlcNAcylation has been previously reported in colon and lung cancer cells, cultured HeLa cell lines, and the human brain [28, 29]. Furthermore, posttranslational O-GlcNAcylation of the NF-κB subunit c-Rel has been implicated in enhanced transcriptional activation of its target genes [30]. Therefore, we considered that Glut3-dependent enhancement of the HBP and subsequent posttranslational O-GlcNAcylation-mediated alteration of the functionality of cellular factors, such as c-Rel, may be an important molecular event that distinctively shapes the TIL–Treg transcriptional landscape.
We first compared the total O-GlcNAcylation of cellular proteins in resting and activated T cells generated via the Foxp3DTR system. We found that global O-GlcNAcylation is indeed significantly greater in DT-aTregs than in internal control CD4+Foxp3− cells (Fig. 3A). Furthermore, Treg O-GlcNAcylation was reduced in Glut3-deficient Tregs subjected to an identical inflammatory environment upon adoptive transfer in Treg-depleted Foxp3DTR mice, indicating that, to a great extent, enhanced O-GlcNAcylation is a Glut3-dependent process (Fig. 3B). Next, we wished to determine whether TIL-Tregs display preferentially enhanced O-GlcNAcylation. Lymphocyte enrichment and isolation from tumor sites require a time-consuming delicate protocol, and O-GlcNAcylation is a dynamic and reversible enzymatic process (Fig. S7B). Therefore, to preserve the pan O-GlcNAcylation of cellular proteins, we took advantage of a widely used specific inhibitor of OGA, Thiamet-G35 (TMG) (Fig. S7B and Fig. 3C), which, in the Foxp3DTR system, was found to further enhance the O-GlcNAcylation of DT-aTregs (Fig. S7C). Indeed, O-GlcNAcylation of Tregs was found to be most prominent at tumor sites, particularly in TMG-treated animals (Fig. 3D).
Fig. 3.
Glut3 expression enhances global protein O-GlcNAcylation in activated Tregs. A Representative flow cytometry histogram (top) and statistical analysis (bottom) of the global O-GlcNAcylation of DT-aTr in Foxp3IRES-GFP-DTR mice. B Scheme for in vivo activation of Tregs from Slc2a3f/fFoxp3IRES-Cre and littermate control mice (top), gating strategy (middle) and global O-GlcNAcylation in activated Tregs (bottom). C Scheme of O-GlcNAcase inhibitor Thiamet-G (TMG) treatment (top) and kinetics of tumor growth (bottom) in B16F10 melanoma-implanted wild-type mice treated with (+TMG) or without TMG (-TMG). D Representative plots and tabulation of global O-GlcNAcylation in splenic and TIL-Tregs and CD4+Foxp3- effector T cells (Teff) from melanoma-bearing WT mice. E–J Relative amounts of pyruvate (E), lactate (F), malate (G), citrate (H), sedoheptulose 7 phosphate (I), and UDP-GlcNAc (J) derived from 13C6-glucose in WT or KO iTregs as assessed via 13C6 isotope tracing. The results are pooled from two independent experiments (A, C-J) or are representative of two independent experiments (B). The data are presented as the means ± SEMs (B) Mean ± SD (E–J). The values on the flow cytometry histograms represent the respective MFIs (A, B, D). ns, not significant, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. P values were derived via paired two-tailed t-tests (A, D), unpaired two-tailed t-tests (B), two-sided Dunn’s tests (E-J), or two-way ANOVA (C)
To ascertain whether Glut3-dependent glucose uptake directly contributes to the HBP via UDP-GlcNAc, we next performed a metabolic-tracing experiment using uniformly labeled 13C6 glucose-containing media. Owing to the requirement of a large number of cells for such stable isotope tracing experiments, we wished to devise an experimental setup using in vitro-generated iTreg cells. For this purpose, utilizing an adoptive transfer cancer model in Rag1-/- mice, we first asked whether ex vivo-generated iTreg cells lacking Glut3 are also phenotypically compromised in controlling the antitumor immune response. We cotransferred FACS-sorted CD45.2+ iTregs (WT or KO) along with congenically marked effector T cells (CD4+CD45.1+Foxp3− Te and CD8+ Tc). The animals were subsequently challenged with B16F10 melanoma cells the following day (Fig. S8A). Consistent with observations in KO Tregs, Glut3-deficient KO-iTregs failed to promote tumor growth (Fig. S8B). This effect was associated with increased proliferation of tumor-infiltrating effector T cells, as evidenced by increased Ki67 expression (Fig. S8C, D). Upon in vitro restimulation, both tumor-infiltrating CD4+Foxp3− Te and CD8+ Tc cells exhibited significantly increased IFNγ production (Fig. S8E, F). Furthermore, there was a marked reduction in the frequency of the CD4+CD45.2+ transferred iTreg population at tumor sites (Fig. S8G). Notably, owing to increased CpG methylation, primarily at the conserved noncoding region 2 (CNS2) of the Foxp3 locus, in vitro-generated iTregs are inherently unstable in terms of maintaining long-term expression of Foxp3 [31, 32]. In concert, we observed that, out of the CD4+CD45.2+ transferred iTreg population, only 30% of the cells retained Foxp3 at the time of analysis. Nevertheless, among the Foxp3+ population, a significant decrease in global O-GlcNAcylation was observed in Foxp3+ KO-iTregs, similar to that observed in KO-Tregs (Fig. S8H). Taken together, these results validated the suitability of utilizing iTreg cells for in vitro metabolic tracing experiments.
To model the tumor microenvironment in vitro, we performed experiments in TCM generated from overnight cultures of single-cell suspensions of B16F10 tumors resected from tumor-bearing mice. In brief, YFP+ iTreg cells generated from magnetically purified CD4+CD25- littermate WT or KO mice were sorted after four days of differentiation, at which point Slc2a3 expression was already more than ~20-fold lower in the KO iTregs than in the WT iTregs (Fig. S8I, J). Sorted iTregs were cultured in 80% TCM for two additional days followed by 24 h of 13C6-glucose labeling. Under this experimental setting, only a small amount of the 13C6 label was found to be incorporated into glycolytic and TCA cycle intermediates such as pyruvate, lactate, malate or citrate (Fig. 3E–H). However, we observed reduced (M+0) lactate in KO iTregs compared with WT iTregs, indicating reduced overall aerobic glycolysis (Fig. 3F). On the other hand, most of the 13C label was found to be incorporated into the pentose phosphate pathway intermediate sedoheptulose 7 phosphate, a phenomenon that was significantly greater in KO iTregs (Fig. 3I). Importantly, there was an ~30% reduction in 13C-label incorporation of UDP-GlcNAc (M+6) in KO iTregs, indicating that Glut3-mediated glucose uptake is indeed required for optimum metabolic flux toward the HBP.
These results indicate that Glut3-dependent glucose sensing in Tregs promotes the O-GlcNAcylation of cellular proteins in the TME. Given that NF-κB is a known O-GlcNAcylated transcription factor whose targets are preferentially downregulated in Glut3-deficient TIL-Tregs, an intriguing possibility is that Glut3-dependent c-Rel O-GlcNAcylation is a specific determinant of TIL-Treg functionality. To test this, we utilized a technical variant of the so-called proximity ligation assay (PLA), in which the physical proximity of two different antibodies detecting O-GlcNAcylated residue(s) and epitopes of a protein of interest can be detected by confocal microscopy or flow cytometry-based detection of an incorporated fluorescent dye (Fig. S9A). Initial standardization of the protocol using the Foxp3DTR system indeed demonstrated that c-Rel is preferentially O-GlcNAcylated in DT-aTregs compared with their resting counterparts (Fig. S9B, S9C left and middle panels). TMG treatment resulted in more widespread detection of the PLA signals in Foxp3− non-Treg cells as well, underscoring the specificity of the approach (Fig. S9C, right panel). Next, we used the PLA to determine whether c-Rel is preferentially O-GlcNAcylated in TIL-Tregs. To obtain statistically interpretable data and circumvent other technical difficulties during the tumor lymphocyte isolation process, we employed PLA followed by flow cytometry for these experiments. Indeed, TIL-Tregs from mouse melanoma patients presented significantly greater O-GlcNAcylation of c-Rel than CD4+Foxp3− Teff cells did, which was further augmented by TMG treatment (Fig. S9D).
If Glut3-dependent O-GlcNAcylation of downstream factors, an important candidate being c-Rel, is indeed a determining molecular event for TIL-Treg-mediated tumor immune suppression, then experimentally enhancing global O-GlcNAcylation in Glut3-deficient Tregs is expected to substantially rescue TIL-Treg function in KO mice. We reasoned that treating the KO mice with TMG may be instrumental in this goal by restoring the otherwise diminished rate of the forward enzymatic reaction (Fig. S7B). We realize that a potential caveat of this strategy is the possibility that systemic administration of TMG may affect tumor growth by extrinsically affecting other non-Treg populations in general. However, in preliminary experiments in which a TMG treatment regimen was established in WT tumor-bearing mice, we did not observe any difference in overall tumor growth. Therefore, TMG treatment per se did not directly influence the growth rate of B16F10 melanoma cells in wild-type mice within this experimental time frame (Fig. 3C, lower panel).
TMG treatment restored melanoma growth in the KO animals (Fig. 4A). Effector cytokine production by Teff and CD8+ T cells mirrored the “rescue” effect of TMG on tumor progression in KO mice. IFNγ, TNF, Granzyme B, and perforin production, which was increased in KO TILs, was reduced to WT levels upon TMG treatment (Fig. 4B–D and Fig. S10A–C). By Ki67 expression analysis, we observed an effect of TMG on the baseline proliferation of all the lymphocyte compartments in both WT and KO mice, and the differences in proliferation between WT and KO Teff and CD8+ TILs were alleviated upon TMG treatment (Fig. 4E). In addition, the intratumoral Treg frequency (Fig. 4F), pancellular O-GlcNAcylation and c-Rel O-GlcNAcylation, which were otherwise diminished in TIL-Tregs from KO mice, were restored (Fig. 4G, H).
Fig. 4.
Glut3-dependent O-GlcNAcylation in TIL-Tregs supports tumor growth. A B16F10 melanoma growth in KO and WT mice treated with TMG (+ TMG) or PBS (-TMG). B–D Production of the effector cytokines IFNγ (B), Granzyme B and perforin (C), and TNF (D) by in vitro restimulated TIL CD4+Foxp3- and CD8+ T cells with or without TMG treatment in KO and WT mice. E Ki67 expression in TIL T cells, as a measure of proliferation, upon TMG treatment in KO and WT mice. F Frequency of TIL-Tregs in melanoma-bearing mice treated as described in (A). G Representative flow cytometry histograms (left) and relative changes in the O-GlcNAc MFI of TIL Tregs compared with Teff cells (right). H Representative flow cytometry histograms (Left) and relative change in the c-Rel–O-GlcNAc PLA MFI of TIL Tregs compared with that of Teff cells (Right). I, J Representative flow cytometry histogram and quantification of glucose-Cy5 uptake in WT and KO TIL-Tregs, with or without TMG treatment, and upon blockade of mitochondrial respiration (rotenone/antimycin A) or oxidative phosphorylation (oligomycin). B–J Experiments were performed on cells isolated from similar-sized tumors by advancing tumor inoculation by one week in untreated KO animals. Oxygen consumption rate (K, left panel), glycolytic proton efflux rate (K, right panel) and quantification (L) upon metabolic flux analysis of iTregs generated in 80% TCM with or without TMG treatment. The results are pooled from two to four (A‒L) independent experiments. The data are presented as the means ± SEMs (A, J) or means ± SDs (B–H, L). The values on the chart represent the MFI (G–I). ns, nonsignificant, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001. P values were obtained with two-way ANOVA (A) and unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test (B-J, L)
Finally, we sought to determine whether and to what extent glucose uptake and glycolysis were affected in Glut3-deficient Treg cells compared with WT Tregs, with or without TMG treatment. To assess glucose uptake by TIL-Tregs, we incubated total TILs isolated from different groups with the cell permeable β-glucose fluorescent tracker glucose-Cy5 followed by flow cytometry. Compared with WT Tregs, Glut3-deficient Tregs presented severe defects in glucose uptake. A similar trend was observed when mitochondrial metabolism was blocked with rotenone and antimycin A. Interestingly, while blockade of oxidative phosphorylation with oligomycin strongly promoted glucose uptake in WT-TIL Tregs in the TMG-treated group, glucose uptake was only marginally increased in the KO group (Fig. 4I, J). To determine glycolytic rates, we next performed Seahorse metabolic flux analysis utilizing a similar iTreg-based in vitro experimental system previously introduced in Fig. S8I. Interestingly, both the oxygen consumption rate (OCR) and glycolytic rates were found to be severely diminished in KO iTregs in TCM, with no compensation upon TMG treatment (Fig. 4K, L). Therefore, TMG-mediated rescue of the TIL-Treg phenotype is unlikely to be attributed to compensatory glycolysis, which is mediated by increased glucose uptake.
To determine the extent to which TMG treatment restores gene expression in Glut3-deficient Tregs, we performed RNA-seq analysis on sorted B16F10 melanoma-infiltrating Tregs from control and TMG-treated KO mice. Indeed, by candidate-based (Fig. 5A, B) and CDF analysis (Fig. 5C), we found significant restoration of the expression of NF-κB target genes. Furthermore, several TIL-Treg signature genes, several of which are known targets of NF-κB, were found to be upregulated in TMG-treated KO-Tregs (Fig. 5A). Extending this analysis to global differentially expressed TIL-Treg gene sets (as shown in Fig. 2J), we found that, in addition to known NF-κB targets, the expression of nearly 45–50% of all Glut3-dependent UP or DOWN genes was restored, as is evident by the opposite DGE pattern, in KO-Tregs upon TMG treatment (Fig. 5D‒G). More precisely, 314 out of the 696 Glut3-dependent DOWN genes displayed the opposite trend and were UP in KO TIL-Tregs upon TMG treatment (Fig. 5D). On the other hand, only 8 of these genes were further downregulated in this context (Fig. 5E). Similarly, whereas only 6 Glut3-dependent UP genes were further upregulated (Fig. 5F), 418 of the 802 genes in this category were downregulated after TMG treatment (Fig. 5G). Therefore, Glut3-dependent downstream posttranslational modification-based O-GlcNAcylation of cellular factors appears to be a general mechanism for distinguishing the Treg gene expression network at tumor sites.
Fig. 5.
Slc2a3 deficiency alters the NF-κB transcriptional landscape in tumor-infiltrating Tregs. A Heatmap showing the expression of genes encoding NF-κB target genes and TITR gene sets upregulated in KO TIL-Tregs upon TMG treatment. B TMG-mediated changes in the expression of 51 NF-κB target genes whose expression was significantly altered in both the KO and WT TIL-Tregs. C CDF analysis of the expression of the ‘expressed’ subset of NF-κB target genes in TIL-Tregs sorted from B16F10 tumors with or without TMG treatment, as assessed by RNA-seq. D–G Venn diagrams depicting the overlap of DGE gene sets from the indicated sample groups. The results are from two pooled samples (A–G). ns, nonsignificant, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001. P values were obtained with an unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test (B) or the Kolmogorov‒Smirnov test (C)
Relevance of GLUT3 in human cancers
Next, we explored the prognostic significance of high GLUT3 expression in human TIL-Tregs and analyzed disease-free survival and hazard ratios (HRs) in survival data from human patients with tumors. For this purpose, we used the web-based analysis platform https://kmplot.com [33]. Increased intratumoral SLC2A3 expression in patients with STAD was correlated with a reduced survival probability and increased HR, indicating an unfavorable prognosis. Interestingly, the prognostic outcomes worsened even more when only ‘Treg-enriched’ tumors were included in the analyses. Patients with ‘Treg-decreased’ tumors did not show such a correlation (Fig. 6A, top panel). SLC2A1 expression, on the other hand, was not significantly correlated (Fig. 6A, lower panel). A similar unfavorable prognosis was recorded for other human tumors, such as head and neck cancer (HNSC) and kidney renal clear cell carcinoma (KIRC) (Fig. S11A, B). Moreover, for cancer types such as breast invasive carcinoma (BRCA) and liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC), higher SLC2A3 expression in patients with Treg-deficient tumors was correlated with a favorable prognosis, which was lost in patients with Treg-enriched tumors (Fig. S11C, D). Interestingly, this in silico approach of gathering correlative evidence of SLC2A3 functionality in human TIL-Tregs upon a comparison between the prognostic outcome in Treg-enriched versus Treg-decreased tumors could be extended to a majority of cancer types present in the TCGA database (Fig. 6B). As a proof of concept of this analytical approach, we confirmed that higher expression of a recently identified functionally relevant TIL-Treg-expressed gene, CD36 [34], correlates with unfavorable prognosis (i.e., increased HR), specifically in Treg-enriched human tumors (Fig. S11E, top panel). In contrast, as a negative control, a similar analysis with CLEC9A, a gene not expressed in Tregs whose high expression was previously shown to correlate with favorable prognosis in several human cancers [35], revealed a lower HR across different tumor types. As expected, the prognostic outcome for CLEC9A was not affected by whether Treg-enriched or Treg-depleted tumors were queried (Fig. S11E, lower panel).
Fig. 6.
Human colon adenocarcinoma-infiltrating Tregs enhance c-REL O-GlcNAcylation. A Kaplan–Meier (KM) plot of human stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD) patients depicting the probability of survival in tumors (all tumors, all available data analyzed; Treg-decreased tumors (Treg-D), Treg-enriched (Treg-E), exhibiting high or low expression of SLC2A3 (top) or SLC2A1 (bottom)). B Volcano plots depicting the associations of SLC2A3 expression and Treg enrichment with the hazard ratio in multiple human cancers. Each dot represents the individual cancer type for which data are available. C Heatmap showing the gene expression of the O-GlcNAc transferase (OGT) and O-GlcNAcase (OGA) enzyme pairs in human tumors analyzed via the TIMER 2.0 QUANTISEQ algorithm. D KM plots showing survival time in human colon adenocarcinoma patients expressing SLC2A3 or SLC2A1. SLC2A3 and SLC2A1 expression was normalized to that of FOXP3 (right panels). Representative confocal micrograph (E) and MFI analysis (F) of c- REL and O-GlcNAc PLA in human colon adenocarcinoma and healthy tissue sections. The average PLA MFI of Tregs per field of view (total 10–11 views per section) is shown (F). Plots were generated via KM plotter (https://kmplot.com/analysis/) (A), TIMER2.0 (http://timer.cistrome.org/) (C) or GEPIA2 (http://gepia2.cancer- pku.cn/#index) (D). The results are from five patients (F). The data are presented as the means ± SEMs (F). The log rank P values are presented in the charts (A, D). ****P < 0.0001; P values are derived with the Mantel‒Cox log rank test (A, D) or Mann‒Whitney two-tailed t-test (F). Scale bars: 10 µm
We next explored the possibility that increased intratumoral SLC2A3 expression in Tregs is correlated with increased O-GlcNAcylation of cellular proteins in human cancers. For this purpose, we first inspected the expression patterns of OGA and OGT in mice and asked whether they are correlated with a reduced O-GlcNAcylation status in Glut3-deficient TIL-Tregs. Our RNA-seq data revealed a clear trend toward reduced expression of these genes in KO TIL-Tregs compared with WT TIL-Tregs (Fig. S11F). Interestingly, somewhat counterintuitively, despite promoting opposing enzymatic events, the expression of OGA and OGT is subjected to tightly coordinated regulation, as they are sensitive to cellular O-GlcNAc levels. Pharmacological inhibition of OGA has been demonstrated to downregulate OGT expression [36]. Conversely, OGT inhibition [37] or OGT knockdown [38] results in OGA downregulation. Therefore, OGA and OGT levels are dynamically adjusted in tandem to cope with the internal O-GlcNAcylation status of cellular proteins. The mechanism of such coordinated regulation is not well understood. Nevertheless, this observation suggested that the coordinated expression patterns of OGA and OGT may be utilized to predict O-GlcNAcylation status and its plausible correlation with SLC2A3 expression in human cancers. Indeed, TIMER2.0 analysis revealed that in most tumors, SLC2A3 expression is strongly correlated with the expression of OGA and OGT (Fig. S11G). More interestingly, as was observed for SLC2A3 (Fig. S1B, C), a remarkable correlation in the expression of both genes was observed across the majority of cancer types, specifically with the level of Treg infiltration. No such correlation was observed for CD4+ non-Treg infiltrates (Fig. 6C). On the basis of these data and our earlier observation of TIL-Treg-specific O-GlcNAcylation of c-Rel, we finally asked whether O-GlcNAcylation of c-REL is a distinctive feature of Tregs at human tumor sites. For this purpose, we analyzed c-REL O-GlcNAcylation in sections of human colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) (Table S1), a relevant cancer type in which high SLC2A3 expression normalized to that of FOXP3 is correlated with a reduced survival probability (Fig. 6D). Indeed, we found that TIL-Tregs in human patient colon adenocarcinoma sections had highly significant c-REL O-GlcNAcylation, as determined by PLA. On the other hand, negligible PLA signals were observed in paired healthy control sections prepared from the same patient (Fig. 6E, F). Therefore, enhanced O-GlcNAcylation of cellular proteins, exemplified by c-REL, appears to be a distinctive feature of tumor-infiltrating Tregs in human cancers. Furthermore, increased SLC2A3 expression in Treg-enriched tumors and its prognostic significance provide strong correlative evidence that altered glucose utilization downstream of GLUT3 critically contributes to this process.
Discussion
Posttranslational modifications (PTMs), on the one hand, ensure the steady-state functionalities of cellular proteins by regulating protein-protein interactions, enzymatic activities, and stability and degradation kinetics; on the other hand, they are utilized as a means of dynamic adaptation of cellular functions in response to extracellular environmental cues. While PTMs such as phosphorylation, acetylation, methylation, ubiquitination, and SUMOylation have been extensively studied over the past several decades, many relatively recently discovered PTMs are rapidly emerging, and their importance in health and disease is beginning to be appreciated. HBP-mediated O-GlcNAcylation of cellular proteins is one such PTM that integrates nutrient availability and metabolic pathways, and its dynamic interplay with other functionally relevant PTMs modulates the cellular processes of a vast range of cell types [39]. Indeed, complete ablation of the posttranslational O-GlcNAcylation of the entire proteome in Treg cells, upon deletion of the only known O-GlcNAc transferase Ogt, renders them almost completely nonfunctional, resulting in rapid, early-onset whole-body autoimmunity and a phenotypic outcome identical to the scurfy phenotype [40]. Therefore, a baseline level of cellular O-GlcNAcylation in Tregs ensures their systemic function and steady-state immune tolerance. Intriguingly, however, our findings reveal that this baseline level of cellular O-GlcNAcylation in Treg cells is subjected to dramatic restructuring in the microenvironments of tumors. More surprisingly, we found that intratumoral glucose sensing through Glut3, a transporter whose expression in Treg cells has remained underappreciated in multiple studies [10, 13, 41], is an essential determinant of this process.
Although many immune cells tend to utilize glucose as a major fuel in the tumor microenvironment [42], glucose utilization strategies by Tregs remain enigmatic. While some reports have indicated increased glucose intake [43] in tumor Tregs and increased glycolysis in murine [44] and human Tregs [45, 46], other studies have highlighted the deleterious effect of glycolysis on the Treg suppression program [7, 47]. One of the early rate-limiting steps in glycolysis is the cellular uptake of glucose [48], which is achieved by active or facilitative glucose transport across the cell membrane via the glucose transporters SGLTs or GLUTs, respectively. T cells have been shown to upregulate GLUT1 upon activation [9], and its genetic ablation leads to ablation of the T-cell-mediated effector immune response [10]. However, Glut1 deletion in mouse Tregs has little effect on their functions [10]. In this context, our study, however, provides evidence that tumor-infiltrated Tregs possess a specific functional requirement for Glut3, a high-affinity glucose transporter that is expressed primarily in neuronal tissues.
Glut3 addiction sustains glioblastoma cells [49] in challenging tumor nutrient environments. In this study, we observed similar Glut3-mediated survival of Treg cells in the TME, as demonstrated by the reduced frequency of Glut3-deficient Tregs in the TME. Glucose has been studied primarily as a fuel for glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation. Glut3 deletion reduces glucose uptake and basal glycolysis in KO Tregs. However, one more striking feature was the reduced incorporation of glucose-derived carbons in UDP-GlcNAc, the precursor sugar moiety for protein O-GlcNAcylation. Interestingly, the restoration of O-GlcNAcylation upon TMG treatment rescued tumor immune tolerance in Glut3-deficient Tregs without affecting their reduced glycolytic rate. The high affinity and increased glucose flux rate sustained by Glut3 are likely prerequisites for preferential glucose utilization by the HBP in tumor Tregs. TMG treatment presumably redirected the low amount of intracellular glucose in TIL-Tregs toward the HBP, enhancing cellular O-GlcNAcylation and extending tumor-specific support to Tregs in KO mice without affecting further glucose uptake or the glycolytic rate.
One of the primary targets of Glut3-mediated O-GlcNAcylation is the pivotal NF-kB subunit c-Rel, a major transcription factor that promotes the suppression of activated Tregs [24, 25]. O-GlcNAcylation has been shown to regulate the DNA binding and transcriptional activity of c-Rel [30, 50]. Furthermore, O-GlcNAcylation of c-Rel modifies its interaction with other NF-κB subunits and subsequent dimerization, leading to the modulation of NF-κB activity [30, 50]. We show that loss of c-Rel O-GlcNAcylation in Glut3-deficient TIL-Tregs leads to significant alterations in the NF-κB transcriptional landscape, leading to obstruction of the highly suppressive immune response of TIL-Tregs. These findings highlight the importance of delineating the functional consequences of O-GlcNAcylation site mutation of c-Rel in tumor Tregs. Although an O-GlcNAcylation site has been reported in c-Rel in Jurkat cells [30], it is unclear whether the same site is O-GlcNAcylated in TIL-Tregs. Additionally, it is unclear whether Glut3 promotes O-GlcNAcylation by merely enhancing O-GlcNAcylation at the same site or if it is a different residue that is differentially O-GlcNAcylated in a Glut3-dependent manner. Answers to these questions in future studies will be instrumental in extending our understanding of the tumor-specific role of c-Rel in Treg cells. Additionally, there is potential for multiple functional targets of protein O-GlcNAcylation in TIL-Tregs that could augment their suppressive functions. The transcription factors NFAT [30, 51] and c-Myc [52] have been demonstrated to be activated by O-GlcNAcylation in T cells. Specifically, c-Myc reportedly orchestrates the accumulation, transitional activation, and metabolic reprogramming of Treg cells [53]. Furthermore, c-Myc directly transactivates the Slc2a1 gene [54]. Should similar regulation of Glut3 expression exist in Tregs, it is conceivable that Glut3 and c-Myc may form a positive feedback loop involving protein O-GlcNAcylation.
Our findings highlight Treg-mediated tolerance mechanisms of tumor immunity, where Glut3 expression in TIL-Tregs leads to downstream O-GlcNAcylation of cellular factors, exemplified by c-Rel, resulting in the establishment of a TIL-Treg genetic landscape and gene expression signature with tumor-specific functional relevance. While these findings highlight the possibility that pharmacological inhibition of Glut3 may be beneficial in Tregs for anticancer therapeutics, the overall applicability of such a strategy will also depend on the effect of Glut3 inhibition on the antitumor immune response mediated by CD8+ T cells. Interestingly, the overexpression of Glut3 in CD8+ T cells for adoptive T-cell therapy improved their metabolic fitness and resulted in enhanced adoptive cell transfer (ACT)-based antitumor immunity [55]. On the other hand, in a contemporary study, T-cell-specific conditional deletion of Glut3 resulted in an increase in the CD44hiCD62Llo effector CD8+ T-cell population compared with that in controls [13]. Therefore, the role of Glut3 in CD8+ T cells may be context specific. While in the context of ACT, its overexpression may prove beneficial, in a potential targeted Treg-targeting therapeutic scenario, concurrent deletion of Slc2a3 in CD8+ T cells may be beneficial for triggering an antitumor immune response by enhancing their activation state.
We anticipate that this study is the starting point of more focused future investigations, which will lead to a comprehensive understanding of tumor environment-specific factors with O-GlcNAcylated posttranslational modifications, the sites of these modifications, their downstream targets and the identification of tumor-specific signals leading to preferential upregulation of Glut3 in TIL-Tregs. These findings provide a novel mechanistic basis for understanding Treg-mediated tumor immune tolerance, which could open new therapeutic avenues for tackling Treg-mediated cancer immune escape.
Materials and methods
Mice
All genetic model mice were on a C57BL/6 background. Foxp3IRES-GFP-DTR [56], Foxp3IRES-YFP-Cre [57], and Foxp3IRES-Thy1.1 [58] mice are described elsewhere. B6.129S7-Rag1tm1Mom/J (Rag1−/−) mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratories. Slc2a3f/f mice were generated at Biocytogen and crossed with Foxp3IRES-YFP-Cre mice to generate Treg-specific Slc2a3-deficient mice. Both male and female mice were used for analysis and quantification. All the mice used were 8–15-week-old, except for aged Slc2a3f/fFoxp3IRES-YFP-Cre mice, which were 36 weeks of age. All animals were maintained in specific pathogen–free barrier facilities and were used in accordance with protocols approved by the POSTECH Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
Mouse tumor models
Both the B16F10 and MC38 cell lines were purchased from ATCC and maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS. To establish a mouse tumor model, 1 × 105 B16F10 cells or 2 × 105 MC38 colon adenocarcinoma cells were subcutaneously injected into the right flank region on day 0. From day 7 onward, tumor growth was monitored on alternate days. Vernier calipers were used to measure the length and width of the tumors, and tumor volumes were calculated via the following formula: volume (mm3) = length × width × [(length × width)0.5] × π/6. Euthanasia was performed at the end of the experiment or if the tumor volume exceeded 2000 mm3 or 15 mm in length on any side.
EAE
Sex- and age-matched (6–13-week-old) WT or KO mice were injected with 0.2 ml of emulsion subcutaneously (s.c.) in the shaved backs of the mice (distributed on either side of the midline on the lower back), with 200 μg of MOG35–55 peptide (MEVGWYRSPFSRVVHLYRNGK, GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd.) emulsified in complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA) (Sigma) containing 400 μg of heat-killed Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Difco). In addition, the mice were administered 600 ng of pertussis toxin (List Biological Laboratories) intraperitoneally (i.p.) on days 0 and 300 ng on day 2. The severity of EAE was monitored every day from day 7 on the basis of a clinical score ranging from 0 to 5: 0 = no clinical signs; 1 = limp tail; 2 = paraparesis (incomplete paralysis of one or two hind limbs, limited mobility); 3 = paraplegia (complete paralysis of two hind limbs); 4 = paraplegia with forelimb weakness or paralysis; and 5 = death. Spinal cords were harvested from the mice for cellular analysis on days 28–30.
CD4+CD45RBhi T-cell transfer-induced colitis model
Splenic CD4+ Treg-depleted cells from Foxp3 reporter mice were enriched with columns (Miltenyi Biotec), and CD4+Foxp3−CD45RBhi T cells were FACS-sorted with a BD FACSAria Fusion Flow Cytometer. Treg cells (CD4+CD25+YFP+) from the LN/mLN/spleen of WT or KO mice were directly sorted by FACS after CD4 enrichment. Approximately 7.5 × 105 CD45RBhi splenocytes alone or with 2.5 × 105 WT or KO Treg cells were transferred into Rag1−/− recipient mice by i.v. injection. The recipient mice were weighed twice every week to measure the percentage change in body weight. The mice were harvested at the end of the experiment for analysis.
Adoptive T-cell transfer melanoma model
Naïve CD4+ T cells were isolated from the lymph nodes and spleens of knockout (KO) and wild-type (WT) mice via the EasySep™ Mouse CD4+ T-Cell Isolation Kit (catalog number 19,852; Stemcell Technologies), followed by FACS sorting. FACS-sorted naïve CD4+ T cells were then differentiated into inducible T regulatory cells (iTregs) via activation in the presence of 4 ng/mL TGF-β and 50 IU/mL IL-2 for 48 h. The cells were subsequently cultured for an additional 4 days in RPMI supplemented with 50 IU/mL IL-2. Postculture, WT and KO CD4+Foxp3+ iTregs were subjected to FACS. CD4+Foxp3− and CD8+ T cells from CD45.1Foxp3GFP mice were used as effector cells. A total of 1 million GFP+ iTregs (either KO or WT), 1 million CD8+ T cells, and 2 million Foxp3−CD4+ T cells were mixed and transferred into Rag1–/– recipient mice [59]. The following day, the mice were subcutaneously implanted with 0.1 million B16F10 melanoma cells in the right flank. Tumor sizes were measured as described earlier. The mice were sacrificed at the end of the experiment for subsequent analysis.
Cellular analysis
To isolate tumor-infiltrated lymphocytes, approximately 500 mg of tumor tissue was chopped into small pieces and incubated in prewarmed 10 ml of RPMI 1640 containing 20 mM HEPES, 40 μg/ml DNAse I (10104159001, Roche), and 500 μg/ml Liberase TL (05401020001, Roche) for 15 min at 37 °C in a shaking incubator (200 rpm). Digestion was stopped by adding 10 ml of ice-cold RPMI 1640 supplemented with 5% FBS. The suspension was passed through a 100 μm strainer, and the remaining tissue chunks were crushed gently over the strainer to release the cells into the media. The cells were pelleted and subjected to gradient separation with 47% Percoll (Cytiva 17-0891-01, Sigma‒Aldrich). The cell pellet was collected after centrifugation and washed with RPMI 1640 containing 10% FBS. If needed, the RBCs were lysed with ACK RBC lysis buffer for two minutes. The cells from spinal cords were isolated in a similar manner except for the Liberase digestion duration was 10 min.
To isolate intestinal lamina propria lymphocytes, the colon and small intestines were collected and rinsed in cold PBS. Peyer’s patches were removed, and the intestines were cut lengthwise and chopped into small pieces (approximately 0.5 inches). The tissue pieces were incubated in a solution of PBS containing 10% FBS, 25 mM HEPES, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, penicillin, and streptomycin at 37 °C in an orbital shaker for 10 min. The EDTA solution was then discarded, and the tissues were washed with RPMI containing 5% FBS. The intestinal tissues were minced further and digested in a solution of 1 mg/mL collagenase A and 40 μg/ml DNAse I in RPMI containing 10% FBS and 25 mM HEPES for 10 min at 37 °C in an orbital shaker. The digested tissue was filtered through a 100 µm cell strainer, and lymphocytes were enriched via Percoll gradient separation. The cells were washed and prepared for downstream analysis.
To isolate cells from secondary lymphoid organs (spleen and lymph nodes), the tissues were gently crushed over a 100 µM strainer and washed with complete RPMI supplemented with 10% FBS. The cells were pelleted and resuspended in complete RPMI. For cytokine production, the cells were stimulated for 5 h with PMA and ionomycin in the presence of Golgi Plug (555029, BD).
For flow cytometric analysis, the cells were stained with viability dye (Ghost Dye Violet 510, 13–0870–T500, Tonbo or Fixable Viability Dye eFluor 780, 65–0865–14, eBioscience) in PBS. The cells were subsequently stained for surface markers in 0.01% BSA in PBS. The cells were fixed and permeabilized with Foxp3 staining buffer (00–5523–00, eBioscience) and stained for intracellular proteins. For O-linked N-acetylglucosamine staining, the cells were blocked with a 2.4G2 Fc block for 10 min at room temperature, followed by staining with a primary anti-O-linked N-acetylglucosamine antibody (Clone RL2, dilution 1:400; ab2739, Abcam) for 30 min at 4 °C. The cells were washed and blocked with 2.4G2 Fc block for 10 min, followed by staining with secondary goat anti-mouse IgG1-PE (Polyclonal, dilution 1:500, sc-3738, SCBT) for 30 min at 4 °C. In some cases, an Alexa Fluor 647-conjugated O-GlcNAc monoclonal antibody (clone RL2, dilution 1:400; ab2739, eBioscience™) was used. Finally, the cells were stained for other markers.
The following FACS antibodies were used: Biolegend - Anti-mouse CD45 (Clone 30-F11), CD3 (Clone 17A2), CD4 (Clone RM4-5, Clone GK1.5), CD8α (Clone 53-6.7), CD44 (Clone IM7), CD45.1 (Clone A20), CD45.2 (Clone 104), CD25 (PC61), GITR (Clone DT1), CTLA4 (Clone UC10-4B9), CD103 (Clone 2E7), IFN-γ (Clone XMG1.2), IL-4 (Clone 11B11), IL-17 (Clone TC11-18H10.1), IL-2 (Clone JES6-5H4), Ki-67 (Clone 16A8); anti-human FOXP3–AF488 antibody (Clone 259D); eBioScience – anti-mouse Foxp3 (Clone FJK-16 s); BD Bioscience – anti-mouse CD62L (Clone MEL-14), CD44 (Clone IM7).
In vivo generation of activated Tregs
Six- to eight-week-old Foxp3IRES-GFP-DTR mice of either sex were injected with 1 µg/animal diphtheria toxin (DT) from Corynebacterium diphtheriae (D-0564, Sigma) intraperitoneally on days 0 and 1 to deplete the Tregs. The animals were sacrificed on day 11 to collect the spleen, and peripheral lymph nodes and lymphocytes were isolated.
In experiments where activation of adoptively transferred Tregs was sought, Foxp3IRES-GFP-DTR mice were administered DT on Day 0 and Day 1. Tregs were adoptively transferred on Day 1, and DT was subsequently administered every other day until Day 11, when the animals were euthanized, and the tissues were collected.
In vivo 2-NBDG uptake assay
CD45.1-Foxp3IRES-GFP-DTR mice were injected with 1 µg/animal DT intraperitoneally on day 0 and day 1 to deplete endogenous Tregs. One million FACS-sorted Thy1.1+ Tregs from CD45.2- Foxp3IRES-Thy1.1 mice were adoptively transferred to DT-treated CD45.1-Foxp3IRES-GFP-DTR host mice on day 1. The animals subsequently received 1 µg/animal DT intraperitoneally on alternate days. On day 11, the animals received a retro-orbital intravenous injection of 100 µL of 1 mg/mL 2-NBDG (11046, Cayman Chemical) or PBS. After 30 min, the animals were sacrificed, the lymphoid organs were collected, and single-cell suspensions were generated. The cells were stained for surface molecules and immediately analyzed by flow cytometry for 2-NBDG uptake.
RNA sequencing
CD4+GFP+ or CD4+YFP+ Tregs from Foxp3IRES-GFP-DTR or Slc2a3f/fFoxp3IRES-YFP-Cre mice or Slc2a3+/+Foxp3IRES-YFP-Cre mice, respectively, were FACS-sorted at >95% purity via a BD Moflo-XDP cell sorter and stored at −80 °C in TRIzol reagent (15596026, Invitrogen). Total RNA was extracted via an RNeasy Micro Kit (74004; Qiagen). The library was prepared with a TruSeq RNA Library Preparation v2 Kit, and sequencing was performed with a SMART-Seq v4 Ultra Low Input RNA Kit for Sequencing according to the manufacturer’s protocols. The quality of the sequenced reads was measured via FastQC (www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/), and low-quality portions of the sequenced reads were trimmed via TrimGalore (version 0.4.2; www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/trim:galore/). The quality of the RNA-Seq data was evaluated via RSeQC [60] (http://code.google.com/p/rseqc/). The trimmed reads were mapped to the mouse genome (reference assembly mm10) via STAR (version 2.5.1) [61]. The abundance of reference genes was estimated via StringTie, and differential gene expression between conditions was estimated via the RUVSeq and DESeq2 programs, with an FDR-adjusted cutoff P value of 0.05. All genes with an average Log2 TPM value of ≥2 were considered expressed genes.
Metabolomics
aTregs and rTregs were subjected to FACS, and the resulting pellets were snap frozen in Liq. N2 and stored at −80 °C until extraction. Frozen cell pellets (≥ 2 × 106 cells) were thawed on ice and extracted with 1.2 ml of extraction solution (chloroform:methanol: water = 3:4:1 (v/v), 5 nmol/L warfarin spiked in) and vortexed, followed by the addition of 0.15 ml of ice-cold water and vortexing. The cells were homogenized via a BeadRuptor (OMNI International, Kennesaw GA) for 3 cycles, namely, 10 s at 8 m/s each and 3 s in between cycles, and then centrifuged at 13700 rpm at 4 °C for 10 min. A volume of approximately 800 µL aqueous phase was transferred to new tubes for lyophilization, and the organic phase was transferred to new tubes for evaporation under a stream of nitrogen at room temperature. Tubes containing no cells were processed in the same way as blanks. Untargeted lipids and metabolites were analyzed by LC‒MS. The organic phases were reconstituted in 30 µL of dichloromethane/methanol (2:1, v/v). A 6 μl sample was injected into a Vanquish Horizon UPLC system equipped with a Thermo Scientific Accucore Vanquish C18+ column (2.1 × 100 mm, 1.5 μm) and eluted at 0.2 ml/min 0–1 min 40% B, 1–15 min 40–100% B, 15–18 min 100% B, 0.3 ml/min 18–22 min 100–40% B (A, acetonitrile: water = 4:6 (v/v), B, acetonitrile:isopropanol = 1:9 (v/v)). A Thermo Scientific Q Exactive hybrid quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometer (QE-MS) equipped with a heated electrospray ionization (HESI) probe was operated via a combined full mass scan and data-dependent MS/MS (full MS/dd-MS2) approach. The HESI probe was run in both positive and negative modes: the heated capillary temperature was held at 320 °C; the sheath gas and aux gas flow rates were set at 45 and 8 units, respectively; and the spray voltage was 3.6 kV for positive mode and 2.5 kV for negative mode. The full MS data were acquired at a resolution of 140,000, the m/z ranged from 100–1500, and the automatic gain control (AGC) target was 1 × 106. The dd-MS2 data were acquired at a resolution of 17,500, an AGC target of 1 × 105, a loop count of 15 and an isolation window of 1.0 m/z.
The aqueous phases were reconstituted in 25 μl of acetonitrile/water (5:95, v/v) containing 10 mM ammonium acetate. A 4 μl sample was injected into a UPLC instrument equipped with a Waters Acquity UPLC BEH amide column (1.0 × 150 mm, 1.7 μm) and eluted at 0.05 ml/min for 0–16.5 min at 99–50% B, 16.5–18 min at 50–1% B, 18–36 min at 1% B, and 36–39 min at 1–99% B (A, water containing 10 mM ammonium acetate; B, acetonitrile). The MS conditions were the same as those used for lipid profiling. The HESI probe was run in both positive and negative modes: the heated capillary temperature was held at 320 °C; the sheath gas and aux gas flow rates were set at 20 and 5 units, respectively; and the spray voltage was 3.6 kV for positive mode and 2.5 kV for negative mode. The full MS data were acquired at a resolution of 140,000, the m/z ranged from 60–900, and the AGC target was 3 × 106. The dd-MS2 data were acquired at a resolution of 35000, an AGC target of 1 × 105, a loop count of 10 and an isolation window of 1.0 m/z. The data were processed via Thermo Fisher Scientific LipidSearch 4.1 and Compound Discover 3.1 as previously described [62].
Analysis of differentially abundant metabolite production
Statistical analysis was carried out via R on the generated table (with the features in the row and samples in the column). The imported table was first transposed, and data normalization was carried out (log10 transformation and autoscaling by using the scale() function of R). Log2FoldChange was calculated between rTreg vs aTreg, and P values were calculated via t-tests. Further features were filtered on the basis of a Log2FoldChange > 1 or <-1, a P value < 0.05, and well-defined feature names (metabolite names), which led to 41 metabolites of interest (26 upregulated and 15 downregulated in aTregs). The upregulated metabolites were subjected to integrated pathway analysis via the IMPaLA web server (http://impala.molgen.mpg.de/) [63].
In vitro suppression assay
CD4+YFP+ Tregs from Slc2a3f/fFoxp3IRES-YFP-Cre and Slc2a3+/+Foxp3IRES-YFP-Cre animals and congenically marked naïve responder cells (CD45.1+ CD4+ Foxp3− CD62LhiCD44lo) were FACS sorted. Responder cells were pulsed with 5 μM CTV (C34557, Invitrogen) for 10 min at 37 °C. A total of 1 × 105 T-cell-depleted APCs and 5 × 104 CTV-pulsed responder cells were mixed with the indicated numbers of Tregs and incubated for 96 h in the presence of 0.3 µg/mL anti-mouse CD3e antibody (145-2C11, BioXCell). After incubation, responder cell proliferation was measured as CTV dilution via flow cytometry.
Proximity ligation assay
c-Rel/c-REL and O-GlcNAc proximity ligation assays [64] were performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol via a Duolink® Flow Cytometry Kit or an in situ fluorescence detection kit (Sigma‒Aldrich) with certain modifications.
For the mouse TIL-Treg FACS PLA, CD45+ lymphoid cells were enriched with mouse CD45 (TIL) microbeads (130–110–618, Miltenyi Biotec) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The cells were counted and fixed overnight at 4 °C with Foxp3 staining buffer (00-5523-00, eBioscience). Before the PLA was started, the cells were permeabilized for 5 min with Foxp3 staining buffer (00–5523–00, eBioscience). A total of 100,000 cells were transferred to a V bottom 96-well plate and washed twice with 200 µL of Duolink® Wash Buffer (DUO82047, Sigma‒Aldrich). The cells were blocked with 30–60 µL of Duolink® Blocking Solution (DUO82007, Sigma‒Aldrich) at 37 °C for 60 min. After incubation, the cells were centrifuged at 500 × g, and the blocking solution was removed. The cells were incubated with primary anti-mouse/human c-Rel antibodies (goat polyclonal, dilution 1:40; AF2699, R&D Systems) and anti-O-linked N-acetylglucosamine antibodies (clone RL2, dilution 1:200; ab2739, Abcam) in Duolink® Antibody Diluent (DUO82008, Sigma‒Aldrich) at 4 °C for 60 min. The cells were washed twice with Duolink® Wash Buffer and incubated with 50 µL of 1:5 Duolink® PLA® probe anti-Goat PLUS (DUO82003) and Duolink® PLA® probe anti-mouse MINUS (DUO82004) at 37 °C for 60 min. The oligonucleotides were ligated, amplified, and detected via the Duolink® flowPLA detection kit Red (DUO94001) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After PLA, the cells were washed with PBS and incubated with anti-mouse CD4–APC/Cy7 (Clone GK1.5, dilution 1:400; 100413, BioLegend), anti-mouse CD8α–BV421 (Clone 53–6.7, dilution 1:400; 100738, BioLegend) and anti-mouse Foxp3–FITC (Clone FJK-16 s, dilution 1:200; 11–5773–82, eBioscience) in PBS at 4 °C for 30 min. The cells were washed with PBS and resuspended in 200 µL of PBS. The samples were analyzed with a BD LSR Fortessa cell analyzer.
For in situ PLA of mouse T cells, CD4+ T cells were enriched via the EasySep™ Mouse CD4+ T-Cell Isolation Kit (19852, Stemcell Technologies). Approximately 100,000 cells were allowed to adhere to poly-L-lysine-coated glass slides at 37 °C for 30 min in a cell culture incubator. Subsequently, the cells were washed with PBS and fixed at 4 °C with Foxp3 staining buffer for 30 min. Fixed cells were permeabilized for 5 min with Foxp3 staining buffer. The cells were washed twice with Duolink® in situ wash buffer A (DUO82049, Sigma‒Aldrich) and blocked with 50 µL of blocking solution at 37 °C for 60 min in a humidified chamber. After blocking, the cells were incubated with primary antibodies, namely, anti-mouse/human c-Rel antibody (goat polyclonal, dilution 1:40; AF2699, R&D Systems) and anti-O-linked N-acetylglucosamine antibody (clone RL2, dilution 1:200; ab2739, Abcam), in 100 µL of Duolink® Antibody Diluent (DUO82008, Sigma‒Aldrich) at 4 °C for 60 min. The cells were washed twice with wash buffer A and incubated with 50 µL of 1:5 Duolink® PLA® probe anti-Goat PLUS (DUO82003) and Duolink® PLA® probe anti-mouse MINUS (DUO82004) at 37 °C for 60 min in a humidified chamber. The bound probe oligonucleotides were ligated, amplified, and detected via Duolink® In Situ Detection Reagents Red (DUO92008) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The cells were subsequently washed twice with Duolink® in situ wash buffer B (DUO82049, Sigma‒Aldrich) and once with 0.01X wash buffer B. Subsequently, the cells were incubated with anti-mouse Foxp3–FITC (Clone FJK-16 s, dilution 1:100; 11–5773–82, eBioscience) in PBS at 4 °C for 60 min. The cells were washed twice with PBS and wet mounted with Duolink® In Situ Mounting Medium with DAPI (DUO82040, Sigma‒Aldrich). The fluorescence images were captured via a TCS SP5 II MP with an SMD confocal microscope (Leica Microsystems Ltd.).
To perform in situ PLA on paired human cancer and healthy tissue sections, tissue cryosections were fixed with Foxp3 staining buffer for 60 min at 4 °C. The sections were permeabilized for 10 min with Foxp3 permeabilization buffer for 10 min at room temperature. After being washed twice with wash buffer A, the sections were blocked with 50 µL of Duolink blocking buffer at 37 °C for 60 min in a humidified chamber. Afterwards, the sections were incubated with primary antibodies, namely, anti-mouse/human c-Rel antibody (goat polyclonal, dilution 1:40; AF2699, R&D Systems) and anti-O-linked N-acetylglucosamine antibody (clone RL2, dilution 1:200; ab2739, Abcam), in 100 µL of Duolink® Antibody Diluent (DUO82008, Sigma‒Aldrich) overnight at 4 °C in a humidified chamber. The remaining PLA process was similar to that of in situ PLA of mouse T cells except that the sections were incubated with an anti-human FOXP3–AF488 antibody (Clone 259D, BioLegend). Confocal images were captured by a TCS SP5 II MP with an SMD confocal microscope. Images were analyzed via Leica Application Suite X. Briefly, regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn around each FOXP3 fluorescence overlapping nuclear stain per image. The average MFI of PLA fluorescence per view was calculated from these ROIs.
Visualization of RNA-seq data
Integrated Genomics Viewer (v2.13, https://software.broadinstitute.org/software/igv/) was used to generate browser snapshots via BigWig files. The loss of reads pertaining to Slc2a3 exons 2 and 3 was confirmed via the Treg RNA-Seq data from Slc2a3f/fFoxp3IRES-YFP-Cre.
Analysis of the associations of gene expression with Treg infiltration in human tumors
Survival analysis of human patients with high SLC2A3 or SLC2A1 expression was performed via Kaplan‒Meier plotter (https://kmplot.com/) [33] with the Pancancer RNA-seq module. The analyses were classified into Treg-enriched or Treg-decreased tumors for each cancer type by ‘restrict analysis on the basis of cellular content’ options.
The gene module of the TIMER2.0 (http://timer.cistrome.org/) [14] web server was used to assess the associations of glucose transporters (SLC2A3 and SLC2A1) and OGT/OGA pairs, which encode key enzymes for the addition and removal of O-GlcNAc modifications, with Treg and non-Treg CD4 T cells in multiple human solid tumors. TIMER 2.0 can be used to statistically deconvolute expression data for the approximate calculation of immune cell infiltration. Correlation analysis between survival in human colon adenocarcinoma patients and the expression of SLC2A3 and SLC2A1 with and without normalization to the FOXP3 gene was performed via GEPIA2 (http://gepia2.cancer-pku.cn/#index) [65].
Preparation of tumor-conditioned media
B16F10 (0.5 × 106) tumor cells were injected subcutaneously into the flanks of wild-type mice, and tumors were harvested when they reached 1000–1500 mm3 in size. A single-cell suspension was prepared, and 1 × 107 cells/mL were plated in complete RPMI media and incubated overnight in a CO2 incubator. The culture media were collected after 24 h, centrifuged, and filtered before being stored in aliquots at −80 °C. TCMs thus prepared were assayed for glucose and lactate using a Glucose-Glo Assay Kit (Promega, J6021) and a Lactate-Glo Assay Kit (Promega, J5021), respectively, to confirm an increase in lactate and a decrease in glucose concentration compared with those in RPMI, as a readout of a typical tumor microenvironment, as reported previously [66]. Prior to use, aliquots were thawed and mixed with complete 10% FBS containing RPMI to prepare 80% TCM for immediate use.
In vivo glucose-Cy5 uptake assay
Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes from B16F10 melanomas in mice were isolated via Liberase as described earlier. Approximately 1 M cells were pretreated with complete RPMI with or without 2 µM oligomycin or 0.5 µM rotenone/antimycin A (both from Agilent, Seahorse, mito stress test kit, 103015-100) for 30 min at 37 °C in a cell culture incubator. The cells were subsequently washed and incubated with 0.4 µM glucose-Cy5 (Sigma, SML3233) in serum-free RPMI with or without 2 µM oligomycin or 0.5 µM rotenone/antimycin A at 37 °C in a cell culture incubator for 25 min. The cells were washed and stained for cell surface markers for 30 min at 4 °C. The cells were analyzed by flow cytometry for glucose‒Cy5 uptake.
Metabolic flux assay
Magnetically purified CD4+CD25- cells were activated in vitro in the presence of 4 ng/ml TGFβ (Novoprotein CA59). After 4 days of induction, iTregs (CD4+YFP+) were sorted via a FACS cell sorter and then incubated in 80% TCM with or without 10 µM TMG for 48 h. After incubation, the cells were harvested in XF assay medium supplemented with 1 mM pyruvate, 2 mM glutamine and 10 mM glucose for a glycolytic rate assay to determine the glycolytic proton efflux rate (glycoPER), as described previously [13]. Briefly, iTregs were seeded into a Cell-Tak (Corning, 354240)-coated 96-well Seahorse plate at a density of 250 K/well. The cells were treated with 0.5 µM rotenone plus 0.5 µM antimycin A (Rot/AA, rotenone, Selleck, S2348; antimycin A, ENZO, ALX-380-075-M010) and 50 mM 2-deoxyglucose (2-DG, MCE, HY-13966-10 g) following the manufacturer’s instructions.
Stable isotope tracing analysis
Sorted iTregs (CD4+YFP+) were cultured in 80% TCM for 48 h and then transferred to glucose-free RPMI (Invitrogen) medium supplemented with 10% dialyzed FBS plus tracer U-13C glucose (Sigma) for isotope carbon labeling. After 24 h, the cells (3 × 106 cells/sample) were washed with ice-cold PBS. One milliliter of extraction solvent (methanol:water, 4:1, v/v, prefrozen at −80 °C for 1 h) was added to each sample, and the mixture was quenched in liquid nitrogen for 10 mins. The samples were stored at −80 °C for subsequent metabolite detection and analysis.
Untargeted metabolic flux analysis was conducted at LipidALL Technologies as described previously [67]. Polar metabolites were extracted using ice-cold methanol containing phenylhydrazine. The samples were vortexed and kept at −20 °C for 30 min for derivatization of alpha-keto acids [68]. Following derivatization, the samples were incubated at 1500 rpm for 30 min at 4 °C. At the end of the incubation, the samples were centrifuged for 10 min at 12,000 rpm at 4 °C. The clean supernatant was transferred to a new tube and dried in a SpeedVac in H2O mode. The dried extract was reconstituted in 5% acetonitrile in water prior to LC‒MS analysis on an Agilent 1290 II UPLC coupled with a Sciex 5600+ quadrupole-TOF MS. For reversed-phase chromatography, polar metabolites were separated on a Waters ACQUITY HSS-T3 column (3.0 × 100 mm, 1.8 µm), whereas a Waters ACQUITY BEH amide column (2.1 × 100 mm, 1.7 µm) was utilized for hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatographic separation. The MS parameters for detection were as follows: ESI source voltage negative ion mode −4.5 kV; vaporizer temperature, 500 °C; drying gas (N2) pressure, 50 psi; nebulizer gas (N2) pressure, 50 psi; curtain gas (N2) pressure, 35 psi; and scan range, m/z 60–850 [69]. The information-dependent acquisition mode was used for MS/MS analyses of the metabolites. The collision energy was set at (-) 35 ± 15 eV. Data acquisition and processing were performed via Analyst® TF 1.7.1 software (AB Sciex, Concord, ON, Canada). All the detected ions were extracted via MarkerView 1.3 (AB Sciex, Concord, ON, Canada) in Excel in the form of a two-dimensional matrix, including the mass-to-charge ratio (m/z), retention time and peak areas. PeakView 2.2 (AB Sciex, Concord, ON, Canada) was applied to extract MS/MS data and perform comparisons with the Metabolites database (AB Sciex, Concord, ON, Canada), HMDB and standard references to annotate ion identities [69]. L-Isoleucine-d10 was used as an internal standard for normalization of peak areas across samples.
Real-time PCR
Total RNA from FACS-sorted Treg cells was extracted via the ReliaPrep RNA cell miniprep system (Z6010; Promega) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and quantified via a Nanodrop (Thermo Fisher). cDNA was synthesized from 500 ng of total RNA, oligo(dT) primers (Promega) and Improm-II Reverse Transcriptase (Promega). cDNA was amplified with SYBR Premix Ex Taq (Takara, Japan) via DNA Engine with Rotor-gene Q (Qiagen, Valencia, USA). The mouse Slc2a3 forward primer ATGGGGACAACGAAGGTGAC and the reverse primer CAGGTGCATTGATGACTCCAG were used for Slc2a3 amplification.
Experimental design
No statistical methods were used to predetermine the sample size. Sample sizes were determined on the basis of previous experience with the chosen animal models. For in vivo experiments, age- and sex-matched mice were randomized into treatment groups. The investigator/s were not blinded to group allocation. No data were excluded, and details on experimental replication are given in the respective figure legends.
Statistical analysis
The data are presented as the means ± SDs or the means ±SEMs as mentioned in the figure legends. The data were analyzed via GraphPad Prism v9. Multiple group comparisons in in vivo tumor models were performed via two-way ANOVA. Single comparisons were performed via unpaired two-tailed t-tests or paired two-tailed t tests. Nonparametric analyses for CDF were performed via the Kolmogorov‒Smirnov test. For metabolic labeling experiments, two-sided Dunn’s test was used for post hoc pairwise comparisons. The human tumor patient survival data are presented as Kaplan‒Meier survival curves, and statistical analysis was performed via the Mantel‒Cox log rank test. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank H. Jung and H. Nam for their technical assistance in cell sorting and K. Cho for their technical assistance in confocal microscopy. We also acknowledge the assistance of Dr. Gustavo Palacios for lipidomic and metabolomic analysis. YC was financially supported by the Dissertation Completion Award of the University of Georgia and American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities (ALSAC) at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital. AG acknowledges support by the High Performance and Cloud Computing Group at the Zentrum für Datenverarbeitung of the University of Tübingen, the state of Baden-Württemberg through bwHPC and the German Research Foundation (DFG) through grant no INST 37/935-1 FUGG, and the de.NBI Cloud within the German Network for Bioinformatics Infrastructure (de.NBI) and ELIXIR-DE (Forschungszentrum Jülich and W-de.NBI-001, W-de.NBI-004, W-de.NBI-008, W-de.NBI-010, W-de.NBI-013, W-de.NBI-014, W-de.NBI-016, W-de.NBI-022) for supporting the computational analysis carried out in this work. AS was supported by BrainKorea21 Plus scholarship from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF). This research, in part, was supported by the Basic Science Research Program (grant# 4.24643.01) funded by the Ministry of Education, Korea, and NRF grants# RS-2023–00260454 (AS) and RS-2024–00345575 (SHI) funded by the Korea Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT). DR is recipient of National Natural Science Foundation of China grant# 32470980.
Author contributions
AS, SHI, and DR conceptualized the project and devised the project outline. AS performed most of the experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. Garima Sharma performed the animal tumor experiments, flow cytometry and cell sorting. ZG performed the EAE and cell transfer-induced colitis experiments. KL and ML performed the animal tumor experiments and in vitro iTreg-based metabolic flux and 13C6-labeling experiments. MW standardized and prepared the tumor-conditioned media for metabolic flux experiments. CJK processed the human tissue sections for PLA. YC performed and analyzed the metabolomic data. AG analyzed and visualized the metabolomics data. HBC, JK, and JMK provided human tumor tissue samples. SML and Guanghou Shui performed sample preparation and LC‒MS for 13C6-labeling experiments. SP directed the analysis of metabolomic data. YF provided scientific insights and facilities for exploratory metabolomic analysis. KK performed the computational analysis of the RNA-Seq data. SHI and DR directed the project, obtained funding, and wrote the manuscript.
Data availability
The RNA-seq datasets that support the findings of this study are deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) under accession no. GSE235402.
Competing interests
Garima Sharma is an employee of ImmunoBiome Inc, South Korea. SHI is the founder and major shareholder of ImmunoBiome Inc, South Korea. SML is an employee of Lipidall Technologies Company Limited, China. The authors have no conflicting financial interests.
Footnotes
These authors contributed equally: Garima Sharma, Zhen Gao.
Contributor Information
Sin-Hyeog Im, Email: iimsh@postech.ac.kr.
Dipayan Rudra, Email: drudra@shanghaitech.edu.cn.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41423-024-01229-8.
References
- 1.Josefowicz SZ, Lu LF, Rudensky AY. Regulatory T cells: mechanisms of differentiation and function. Annu Rev Immunol. 2012;30:531–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tanaka A, Sakaguchi S. Targeting Treg cells in cancer immunotherapy. Eur J Immunol. 2019;49:1140–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Liu C, Chikina M, Deshpande R, Menk AV, Wang T, Tabib T, et al. Treg Cells Promote the SREBP1-Dependent Metabolic Fitness of Tumor-Promoting Macrophages via Repression of CD8(+) T-Cell-Derived Interferon-gamma. Immunity. 2019;51:381–97.e6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bos P, Rudensky A. Transient regulatory T-cell ablation deters oncogene driven breast cancer and enhances radiotherapy. J Exp Med. 2013;210:2435–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Klages K, Mayer CT, Lahl K, Loddenkemper C, Teng MW, Ngiow SF, et al. Selective depletion of Foxp3+ regulatory T cells improves effective therapeutic vaccination against established melanoma. Cancer Res. 2010;70:7788–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sakaguchi S, Mikami N, Wing JB, Tanaka A, Ichiyama K, Ohkura N. Regulatory T Cells and Human Disease. Annu Rev Immunol. 2020;38:541–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Watson MJ, Vignali PDA, Mullett SJ, Overacre-Delgoffe AE, Peralta RM, Grebinoski S, et al. Metabolic support of tumor-infiltrating regulatory T cells by lactic acid. Nature. 2021;591:645–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zappasodi R, Serganova I, Cohen IJ, Maeda M, Shindo M, Senbabaoglu Y, et al. CTLA-4 blockade drives loss of Treg stability in glycolysis-low tumors. Nature. 2021;591:652–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Frauwirth KA, Riley JL, Harris MH, Parry RV, Rathmell JC, Plas DR, et al. The CD28 Signaling Pathway Regulates Glucose Metabolism. Immunity. 2002;16:769–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Macintyre AN, Gerriets VA, Nichols AG, Michalek RD, Rudolph MC, Deoliveira D, et al. The glucose transporter Glut1 is selectively essential for CD4 T-cell activation and effector function. Cell Metab. 2014;20:61–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ho PC, Kaech SM. Reenergizing T-cell anti-tumor immunity by harnessing immunometabolic checkpoints and machineries. Curr Opin Immunol. 2017;46:38–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Simpson IA, Dwyer D, Malide D, Moley KH, Travis A, Vannucci SJ. The facilitative glucose transporter GLUT3: 20 years of distinction. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2008;295:E242–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hochrein SM, Wu H, Eckstein M, Arrigoni L, Herman JS, Schumacher F, et al. The glucose transporter GLUT3 controls T helper 17 cell responses through glycolytic-epigenetic reprogramming. Cell Metab. 2022;34:516–32.e11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Li T, Fu J, Zeng Z, Cohen D, Li J, Chen Q, et al. TIMER2.0 for analysis of tumor-infiltrating immune cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:W509–W14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Magnuson AM, Kiner E, Ergun A, Park JS, Asinovski N, Ortiz-Lopez A, et al. Identification and validation of a tumor-infiltrating Treg transcriptional signature conserved across species and tumor types. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115:E10672–E81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sercan O, Stoycheva D, Hammerling GJ, Arnold B, Schuler T. IFN-gamma receptor signaling regulates memory CD8+ T-cell differentiation. J Immunol. 2010;184:2855–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zheng L, Fisher G, Miller RE, Peschon J, Lynch DH, Lenardo MJ. Induction of apoptosis in mature T cells by tumor necrosis factor. Nature. 1995;377:348–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bollyky PL, Falk BA, Long SA, Preisinger A, Braun KR, Wu RP, et al. CD44 costimulation promotes FoxP3+ regulatory T-cell persistence and function via production of IL-2, IL-10, and TGF-beta. J Immunol. 2009;183:2232–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Flynn KM, Michaud M, Madri JA. CD44 deficiency contributes to enhanced experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis: a role in immune cells and vascular cells of the blood‒brain barrier. Am J Pathol. 2013;182:1322–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.de Oliveira CE, Gasparoto TH, Pinheiro CR, Amor NG, Nogueira MRS, Kaneno R, et al. CCR5-Dependent Homing of T Regulatory Cells to the Tumor Microenvironment Contributes to Skin Squamous Cell Carcinoma Development. Mol Cancer Ther. 2017;16:2871–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Xia S, Liu X, Cao X, Xu S. T-cell expression of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase promotes autoreactive T-cell activation and exacerbates aplastic anemia. Cell Mol Immunol. 2020;17:1042–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Trzupek D, Dunstan M, Cutler AJ, Lee M, Godfrey L, Jarvis L, et al. Discovery of CD80 and CD86 as recent activation markers on regulatory T cells by protein‒RNA single-cell analysis. Genome Med. 2020;12:55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sutmuller RP, den Brok MH, Kramer M, Bennink EJ, Toonen LW, Kullberg BJ, et al. Toll-like receptor 2 controls expansion and function of regulatory T cells. J Clin Invest. 2006;116:485–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Grinberg-Bleyer Y, Oh H, Desrichard A, Bhatt DM, Caron R, Chan TA, et al. NF-kappaB c-Rel Is Crucial for the Regulatory T-Cell Immune Checkpoint in Cancer. Cell. 2017;170:1096–108.e13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Oh H, Grinberg-Bleyer Y, Liao W, Maloney D, Wang P, Wu Z, et al. An NF-kappaB Transcription-Factor-Dependent Lineage-Specific Transcriptional Program Promotes Regulatory T-Cell Identity and Function. Immunity. 2017;47:450–65.e5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Arvey A, van der Veeken J, Samstein RM, Feng Y, Stamatoyannopoulos JA, Rudensky AY. Inflammation-induced repression of chromatin bound by the transcription factor Foxp3 in regulatory T cells. Nat Immunol. 2014;15:580–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lee JB, Pyo KH, Kim HR. Role and Function of O-GlcNAcylation in Cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13:5365–79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 28.Shimizu M, Tanaka N. IL-8-induced O-GlcNAc modification via GLUT3 and GFAT regulates cancer stem cell-like properties in colon and lung cancer cells. Oncogene. 2019;38:1520–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Gu J, Jin N, Ma D, Chu D, Iqbal K, Gong CX, et al. Calpain I Activation Causes GLUT3 Proteolysis and Downregulation of O-GlcNAcylation in Alzheimer’s Disease Brain. J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;62:1737–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ramakrishnan P, Clark PM, Mason DE, Peters EC, Hsieh-Wilson LC, Baltimore D. Activation of the transcriptional function of the NF-kappaB protein c-Rel by O-GlcNAc glycosylation. Sci Signal. 2013;6:ra75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Josefowicz SZ, Niec RE, Kim HY, Treuting P, Chinen T, Zheng Y, et al. Extrathymically generated regulatory T cells control mucosal TH2 inflammation. Nature. 2012;482:395–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zheng Y, Josefowicz S, Chaudhry A, Peng XP, Forbush K, Rudensky AY. Role of conserved noncoding DNA elements in the Foxp3 gene in regulatory T-cell fate. Nature. 2010;463:808–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lanczky A, Gyorffy B. Web-Based Survival Analysis Tool Tailored for Medical Research (KMplot): Development and Implementation. J Med internet Res. 2021;23:e27633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wang H, Franco F, Tsui YC, Xie X, Trefny MP, Zappasodi R, et al. CD36-mediated metabolic adaptation supports regulatory T-cell survival and function in tumors. Nat Immunol. 2020;21:298–308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bottcher JP, Bonavita E, Chakravarty P, Blees H, Cabeza-Cabrerizo M, Sammicheli S, et al. NK Cells Stimulate Recruitment of cDC1 into the Tumor Microenvironment Promoting Cancer Immune Control. Cell. 2018;172:1022–37.e14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zhang Z, Tan EP, VandenHull NJ, Peterson KR, Slawson C. O-GlcNAcase Expression is Sensitive to Changes in O-GlcNAc Homeostasis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2014;5:206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Gloster TM, Zandberg WF, Heinonen JE, Shen DL, Deng L, Vocadlo DJ. Hijacking a biosynthetic pathway yields a glycosyltransferase inhibitor within cells. Nat Chem Biol. 2011;7:174–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kazemi Z, Chang H, Haserodt S, McKen C, Zachara NE. O-linked beta-N-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc) regulates stress-induced heat shock protein expression in a GSK-3beta-dependent manner. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:39096–107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Yang X, Qian K. Protein O-GlcNAcylation: emerging mechanisms and functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2017;18:452–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Liu B, Salgado OC, Singh S, Hippen KL, Maynard JC, Burlingame AL, et al. The lineage stability and suppressive program of regulatory T cells require protein O-GlcNAcylation. Nat Commun. 2019;10:354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Gerriets VA, Kishton RJ, Nichols AG, Macintyre AN, Inoue M, Ilkayeva O, et al. Metabolic programming and PDHK1 control CD4+ T-cell subsets and inflammation. J Clin Invest. 2015;125:194–207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Reinfeld BI, Madden MZ, Wolf MM, Chytil A, Bader JE, Patterson AR, et al. Cell-programmed nutrient partitioning in the tumor microenvironment. Nature. 2021;593:282–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ho PC, Bihuniak JD, Macintyre AN, Staron M, Liu X, Amezquita R, et al. Phosphoenolpyruvate Is a Metabolic Checkpoint of Anti-tumor T-Cell Responses. Cell. 2015;162:1217–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Priyadharshini B, Loschi M, Newton RH, Zhang JW, Finn KK, Gerriets VA, et al. Cutting Edge: TGF-beta and Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase Signals Modulate Distinct Metabolism of Regulatory T-Cell Subsets. J Immunol. 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 45.De Rosa V, Galgani M, Porcellini A, Colamatteo A, Santopaolo M, Zuchegna C, et al. Glycolysis controls the induction of human regulatory T cells by modulating the expression of FOXP3 exon 2 splicing variants. Nat Immunol. 2015;16:1174–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Procaccini C, Carbone F, Di Silvestre D, Brambilla F, De Rosa V, Galgani M, et al. The Proteomic Landscape of Human Ex Vivo Regulatory and Conventional T Cells Reveals Specific Metabolic Requirements. Immunity. 2016;44:406–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Gerriets VA, Kishton RJ, Johnson MO, Cohen S, Siska PJ, Nichols AG, et al. Foxp3 and Toll-like receptor signaling balance Treg cell anabolic metabolism for suppression. Nat Immunol. 2016;17:1459–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 48.Tanner LB, Goglia AG, Wei MH, Sehgal T, Parsons LR, Park JO, et al. Four Key Steps Control Glycolytic Flux in Mammalian Cells. Cell Syst. 2018;7:49–62.e8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Cosset E, Ilmjarv S, Dutoit V, Elliott K, von Schalscha T, Camargo MF, et al. Glut3 Addiction Is a Druggable Vulnerability for a Molecularly Defined Subpopulation of Glioblastoma. Cancer Cell. 2017;32:856–68.e5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Hwang SY, Hwang JS, Kim SY, Han IO. O-GlcNAcylation and p50/p105 binding of c-Rel are dynamically regulated by LPS and glucosamine in BV2 microglia cells. Br J Pharm. 2013;169:1551–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Golks A, Tran TT, Goetschy JF, Guerini D. Requirement for O-linked N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase in lymphocytes activation. EMBO J. 2007;26:4368–79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Swamy M, Pathak S, Grzes KM, Damerow S, Sinclair LV, van Aalten DM, et al. Glucose and glutamine fuel protein O-GlcNAcylation to control T-cell self-renewal and malignancy. Nat Immunol. 2016;17:712–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Saravia J, Zeng H, Dhungana Y, Bastardo Blanco D, Nguyen TM, Chapman NM, et al. Homeostasis and transitional activation of regulatory T cells require c-Myc. Sci Adv. 2020;6:eaaw6443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Osthus RC, Shim H, Kim S, Li Q, Reddy R, Mukherjee M, et al. Deregulation of glucose transporter 1 and glycolytic gene expression by c-Myc. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:21797–800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Cribioli E, Giordano Attianese GMP, Ginefra P, Signorino-Gelo A, Vuillefroy de Silly R, Vannini N, et al. Enforcing GLUT3 expression in CD8(+) T cells improves fitness and tumor control by promoting glucose uptake and energy storage. Front Immunol. 2022;13:976628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Kim JM, Rasmussen JP, Rudensky AY. Regulatory T cells prevent catastrophic autoimmunity throughout the lifespan of mice. Nat Immunol. 2007;8:191–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Rubtsov YP, Rasmussen JP, Chi EY, Fontenot J, Castelli L, Ye X, et al. Regulatory T-cell-derived interleukin-10 limits inflammation at environmental interfaces. Immunity. 2008;28:546–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Liston A, Nutsch KM, Farr AG, Lund JM, Rasmussen JP, Koni PA, et al. Differentiation of regulatory Foxp3+ T cells in the thymic cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:11903–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Loo CS, Gatchalian J, Liang Y, Leblanc M, Xie M, Ho J, et al. A Genome-wide CRISPR Screen Reveals a Role for the Noncanonical Nucleosome-Remodeling BAF Complex in Foxp3 Expression and Regulatory T-Cell Function. Immunity. 2020;53:143–57.e8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Wang L, Wang S, Li W. RSeQC: quality control of RNA-seq experiments. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:2184–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S, et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:15–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Fu G, Guy CS, Chapman NM, Palacios G, Wei J, Zhou P, et al. Metabolic control of TFH cells and humoral immunity by phosphatidylethanolamine. Nature. 2021;595:724–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Kamburov A, Cavill R, Ebbels TM, Herwig R, Keun HC. Integrated pathway-level analysis of transcriptomics and metabolomics data with IMPaLA. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:2917–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Hegazy M, Cohen-Barak E, Koetsier JL, Najor NA, Arvanitis C, Sprecher E, et al. Proximity Ligation Assay for Detecting Protein‒Protein Interactions and Protein Modifications in Cells and Tissues in Situ. Curr Protoc Cell Biol. 2020;89:e115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Tang Z, Kang B, Li C, Chen T, Zhang Z. GEPIA2: an enhanced web server for large-scale expression profiling and interactive analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 2019;47:W556–W60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Chowdhury S, Kar A, Bhowmik D, Gautam A, Basak D, Sarkar I, et al. Intracellular Acetyl-CoA Potentiates the Therapeutic Efficacy of Antitumor CD8+ T Cells. Cancer Res. 2022;82:2640–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Shen L, Hu P, Zhang Y, Ji Z, Shan X, Ni L, et al. Serine metabolism antagonizes antiviral innate immunity by preventing ATP6V0d2-mediated YAP lysosomal degradation. Cell Metab. 2021;33:971–87.e6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Zimmermann M, Sauer U, Zamboni N. Quantification and mass isotopomer profiling of alpha-keto acids in central carbon metabolism. Anal Chem. 2014;86:3232–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Tian H, Ni Z, Lam SM, Jiang W, Li F, Du J, et al. Precise Metabolomics Reveals a Diversity of Aging-Associated Metabolic Features. Small Methods. 2022;6:e2200130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The RNA-seq datasets that support the findings of this study are deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) under accession no. GSE235402.






