Skip to main content
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences: CMLS logoLink to Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences: CMLS
. 2011 Oct 2;69(6):843–856. doi: 10.1007/s00018-011-0843-y

Trafficking and stability of voltage-gated calcium channels

Brett A Simms 1, Gerald W Zamponi 1,✉
PMCID: PMC11115007  PMID: 21964928

Abstract

Voltage-gated calcium channels are important mediators of calcium influx into electrically excitable cells. The amount of calcium entering through this family of channel proteins is not only determined by the functional properties of channels embedded in the plasma membrane but also by the numbers of channels that are expressed at the cell surface. The trafficking of channels is controlled by numerous processes, including co-assembly with ancillary calcium channel subunits, ubiquitin ligases, and interactions with other membrane proteins such as G protein coupled receptors. Here we provide an overview about the current state of knowledge of calcium channel trafficking to the cell membrane, and of the mechanisms regulating the stability and internalization of this important ion channel family.

Keywords: Calcium channels, Beta subunit, Alpha2-delta subunit, Calmodulin, Ubiquitin, ER

Introduction

Voltage-gated calcium channels are one of the major sources of depolarization-evoked calcium entry into electrically excitable cells. The ensuing increase in intracellular calcium concentrations gives rise to a wide range of physiological responses, including calcium-dependent gene transcription, calcium release from internal stores, excitation contraction coupling, and secretion/neurotransmitter release [1–8]. Physiological roles of voltage-gated calcium channels are well summarized in other reviews [9]. On the other hand, excessive entry of calcium ions into the cytosol is toxic [10], and therefore calcium entry and handling must be under precise cellular control. With regard to calcium channels, this can be achieved in two principal manners: (1) regulation of calcium channel activity, and (2) the active number of channels that are embedded in the plasma membrane. While much attention has focused on the former mechanism, the molecular determinants that underlie calcium channel trafficking to and from the plasma membrane remain incompletely understood. That said, there have been a number of recent advances in our understanding of calcium channel trafficking and their targeting to specific subcellular loci, as well as mechanisms that determine the lifetime of channel complexes in the plasma membrane. Here we provide a detailed overview of this current state of knowledge.

Subtypes, structure, and subunit composition of voltage-gated calcium channels

Voltage-gated calcium channels are classified based on their biophysical properties, into high-voltage-activated (HVA) and low-voltage-activated (LVA) channels [11, 12]. The HVA channels include multiple subtypes, including N-, P/Q-, L-, and R-type channels that can be distinguished both by their gating characteristics and their pharmacological profiles [13]. They are multi-subunit complexes that contain a pore-forming Cavα1 subunit, plus ancillary Cavβ (hereafter referred to as the β subunit), Cavα2δ (hereafter referred to as α2δ) and in some cases Cavγ subunits (hereafter referred to as the γ subunit), which co-assemble into a functional channel in a 1:1:1:1 stoichiometry [14–16] for review, see [13, 17] (Fig. 1). Furthermore, the calcium-binding protein calmodulin is now considered part of the HVA calcium channel complex [18]. The mammalian genome expresses seven different types of HVA Cavα1 subunits (falling into Cav1 and Cav2 families), four different types of β subunits, and four different types of α2δ subunits for review, see [13]. The α1 subunit is the major determinant of calcium channel subtype, such that L-type channels are encoded by one of four different Cavα1 subunits (Cav1.1, Cav1.2, Cav1.3, or Cav1.4), P/Q-type channels contain Cav2.1 subunits, N-type channels are defined by Cav2.2 and finally R-type channels contain Cav2.3 subunits [13]. The α1 subunit is comprised of four homologous transmembrane domains, each of which contains six transmembrane helices plus a re-entrant p-loop structure (Fig. 1a). The domains are flanked by intracellular N- and C-terminus regions, and connected by large cytoplasmic linkers. While the Cavα1 subunit contains all of the molecular machinery necessary to form a functional channel, including voltage sensors [19], inactivation gate [20], and selectivity filter [21], the coexpression of ancillary β and α2δ subunits regulates the basic functional properties of the channels [22, 23], altering their regulation by intracellular messengers [24, 25], and most importantly, greatly increasing cell surface density (for review see [26, 27]). The β subunit is a cytoplasmic protein that binds to a highly conserved region within the domain I–II linker region of HVA Cavα1 subunits, which has been termed the Alpha Interaction Domain (AID) (Fig. 1b) [28, 29]. Crystal structure data have revealed that the β subunit contains SH3 and guanylate kinase (GK) domains that are highly conserved among the different β subunits [30–32]. Amino acid residues in the GK domain participate in the high-affinity binding of the AID region [31, 33, 34]. Among the four major types of β subunits, β2a is unique in that its N-terminal region contains two cysteine residues that are palmitoylated and thereby anchored to the plasma membrane [35]. Each of the four α2δ subunits are transcribed and translated from a single gene, post-translationally cleaved into α2 and δ fragments, which are then re-linked via disulfide bonds. For a review, see [36]. The δ subunit was originally thought to span the plasma membrane, but may in fact be linked to the extracellular leaflet of the membrane via a GPI anchor [37, 38], whereas the α2 subunit is purely extracellular. The physiological role of GPI-anchoring is still up for debate however, as α2δ subunits lacking a GPI-anchor sequence still target to lipid rafts with the addition of an inert transmembrane sequence [39]. Because most calcium channel subunits, including α2δ, are subject to alternate splicing, a tremendous diversity of calcium channel complexes and phenotypes is possible [40–43]; for reviews see [44–46].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Structure of Cavα1 and the auxiliary subunits of voltage-gated calcium channels. a Structure of the pore-forming Cavα1 subunit is composed of four transmembrane domains, each of which contains six membrane spanning segments. Segment four of each domain contains a positively charged voltage sensor, while calcium selectivity is provided by re-entrant pore loops (green) between segments five and six of each domain. The intracellular loops of HVA Cavα1 subunits contain sequences vital to trafficking and function, such as the AID (alpha-interaction-domain) in the I–II loop, as well as the EF-hand motif, pre-IQ and IQ domains in the C-terminus. b Structure of the assembled HVA calcium channel complex consists of 1:1:1:1 stoichiometry of the pore-forming Cavα1, cytoplasmic Cavβ, membrane anchored Cavα2δ, and in some instances, transmembrane Cavγ subunit. Note: the AID domain of Cavα1 is occluded by binding of Cavβ (via the Guanylate Kinase domain), and that the δ portion of the α2δ subunit is anchored to the cell membrane by a GPI anchor. The II–III and III–IV linkers have been omitted for clarity

Mammals express three different types of LVA α1 subunits (Cav3.1, Cav3.2, and Cav3.3), all of which encode T-type calcium channels [47]. Unlike HVA channels, these subunits do not appear to co-assemble with ancillary subunits, and expression of just the Cav3 α1 subunit gives rise to large currents with typical T-type current waveforms [48]. Consistent with the absence of β subunit interactions, T-type channels lack the AID region in the domain I–II linker.

Cavβ subunit regulation of HVA channel membrane trafficking

The ability of β subunits to promote membrane expression of HVA calcium channels is well established. Early experiments revealed that antisense knockdown of β subunits reduced HVA plasma membrane expression in dorsal root ganglion neurons [49], and that whole cell currents carried by various HVA calcium channels in transient expression systems such as Xenopus oocytes and tsA-201 cells were dramatically reduced in the absence of co-expressed β subunits, albeit not completely eliminated [22, 50]. This β subunit-dependent increase in plasma membrane expression levels could be in principle due to a number of different mechanisms, including an upregulation of Cavα1 subunit transcription, enhanced export of the channels from the ER, or an increase in channel stability once the channels have reached the plasma membrane. Bichet et al. [51] showed that CD8 receptor fusion constructs of the Cav2.1 I–II linker region were retained in the ER unless coexpressed with a β subunit. Furthermore, deletion of part of the I–II loop in the full-length channel resulted in increased ER export in the absence of the β subunit. Based on these findings, the authors suggested that one of the major roles of the β subunit is to occlude an ER retention motif on the I–II loop of the channel. The ER retention mechanism is also supported by experiments showing that a single point mutation in the AID region can prevent the plasma membrane translocation of Cav1.2 and Cav2.2 channels even in the presence of β subunits [52, 53] and it is therefore unlikely that the β subunit acts as a transcription factor for Cavα1.

However, the molecular details by which β subunits promote ER export appear to vary with calcium channel subtype. Using an approach similar to that used by Bichet et al., our lab showed that the domain I–II linkers of Cav1.2 and Cav2.2 are not retained in the ER, but that instead the C-terminus region of these two channel subtypes may be responsible for the ER retention of N-type and L-type channels [54]. Because the β subunit does not bind to the C-terminus region of these channels, this suggests that the β subunit could perhaps indirectly (i.e., sterically or allosterically) mask these retention motifs when β is bound to the AID region. Such a mechanism was explored recently in an elegant study by Fang and Colecraft [55] who swapped intracellular regions between L-type and T-type calcium channels to examine structural determinants of L-type channel membrane expression. Based on the expression of these constructs in the absence and the presence of the β subunit, the authors concluded that the ancillary subunit promotes rearrangements of the major intracellular loops of the channel, which ultimately result in the obfuscation of multiple ER retention motifs contained within these linkers. Interestingly, the authors also showed that the domain I–II linker in fact contains an ER-export motif whose function is compromised by β subunit coexpression. While the net effect of β subunit coexpression is an overall enhancement of channel trafficking, this ER export motif may perhaps explain the ability of some β-free channels to escape the ER. Altogether, it appears as if the β subunit is able to overcome intrinsic ER retention properties of at least three of the major HVA channel subtypes, albeit perhaps by channel subtype specific mechanisms.

What happens to channels that remain associated with the ER? We recently showed that Cav1.2 channels are tonically ubiquitinated, and that the degree of both mono and poly-ubiquitination is increased in the absence of the β subunit (Fig. 2) [54]. Furthermore, we were able to show that RFP2, an ER associated ubiquitin ligase, was responsible for this effect. We were then able to demonstrate that in the absence of the β subunit, an interaction occurs between the channel and p97/Derlin-1, two proteins associated with the ER Associated Protein Degradation (ERAD) system. The end result is channel retrotranslocation and proteasomal degradation in the cytosol [56, 57]. Consistent with this model, treatment of cells with the proteasomal inhibitor MG132 resulted in increased cell surface expression of Cav1.2 channels lacking the β subunit. The proteasomal inhibitor MG132 has also been reported to enhance trafficking of N-type calcium channels expressed in sympathetic neurons [58].

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Forward trafficking of Cav1 and Cav2 channel complexes. The Cavα1 subunit can traffic to the surface without auxiliary subunits, but β and α2δ subunits dramatically and additively increase the proportion of channels in the cell membrane. This increased surface expression is achieved by promoting ER export and increasing overall channel stability. Calmodulin, AKAP79, and GPCRs such as, nociceptin, D1 and D2 dopamine receptors can augment forward trafficking of calcium channel complexes. The β subunit protects Cav1.2 and Cav2.2 from ER associated proteasomal degradation (ERAD). The β subunit protects Cav1.2 from ERAD by interfering with the ubiquitin ligase activity of RFP2. RFP2 ubiquitination leads to Derlin and p97 association with the calcium channel complex and retrotranslocation of the poly-ubiquitinated channels. Poly-ubiquitinated channels in the cytosol move on to the 26S proteasome for degradation. Proteasomal inhibitors such as MG132 are able to rescue some of the retrotranslocated channels

Altogether, these findings suggest that the β subunit acts as a switch that diverts channels away from a proteasomal degradation pathway to allow channel export to the plasma membrane via reduced ER retention.

Cavα2δ regulation of HVA channel membrane trafficking

Coexpression of HVA channels with α2δ also promotes the surface expression of channels, and this effect appears to be synergistic with that of the β subunit [59]. The α2δ subunit is of particular interest as it is the principal target for gabapentin and pregabalin [60, 61], which are widely prescribed analgesics for patients with chronic pain [62, 63]. Effects of α2δ coexpression on HVA channel density have been observed in various expression systems such as Xenopus oocytes, tsA-201 and Cos7 cells [59, 64, 65]. A role of α2δ in channel expression is also supported by experiments in Ducky mice—a mouse line in which the α2δ-2 subunit carries a premature truncation mutation. These mice show severe ataxia and a dramatic reduction in Cav2.1 channel current densities in cerebellar Purkinje neurons [66]. On the other hand, the phenotypes of the recently published α2δ-1 and α2δ-3 knock-out mice are relatively mild, perhaps due to compensation by other α2δ isoforms [67, 68].

The α2δ subunit contains a metal ion-dependent adhesion site in a region that is homologous to a specific domain (i.e., A-domain) found in the glycoprotein “von Willebrand factor”. This putative metal adhesion site is localized in the proximal third of the α2 portion of the subunit [65], and when this site was mutated, the α2δ subunit still trafficked to the cell surface, however, it lost the ability to mediate membrane targeting of Cav1.2, Cav2.1 and Cav2.2 subunits. The authors suggested that the Cavα1 subunit may act as a ligand for α2δ, and once the two partners are in a complex, a functional von Willebrand domain is needed to trigger ER export (Fig. 2).

As noted above, gabapentin serves as a potent analgesic, and these properties are lost in mice carrying a single point mutation in α2δ [69]. The mechanism by which gabapentin inhibits pain signalling is controversial. Although there are some reports of acute effects of gabapentin on channel function (for review, see [70]), recent evidence indicates an effect of gabapentin on N-type calcium channel trafficking. First, trafficking of transiently expressed Cavα2 channels appears to be impeded by gabapentin [71]. Second, the enhancement of N-type calcium channel surface expression associated with chronic pain states is abrogated by gabapentin treatment [72]. Finally, gabapentin has been shown to inhibit Rab11-dependent recycling of N-type calcium channels from the plasma membrane [73], suggesting that the α2δ subunit may under normal circumstances be involved in the regulation of calcium channel re-insertion into the cell membrane. Altogether, these observations fit with a mechanism by which gabapentin interferes with normal α2δ-mediated promotion of channel trafficking to the cell surface, akin to what is observed in von Willebrand factor mutants. It is, however, important to note that (with the exception of α2δ-2), the regulation of calcium channel membrane targeting by α2δ subunits has been examined primarily in expression systems, and it is possible that the in vivo trafficking function of α2δ in native cells may depend on calcium channel subtype and/or the cellular environment [74–76].

Cavγ subunits—regulators of function but not trafficking

It is well established that skeletal muscle L-type calcium channel complexes contain a γ subunit. It was subsequently shown that neurons express multiple homologues of skeletal muscle γ, most notably γ2, which is also known as “stargazin” [77]. The primary physiological function of stargazin is to mediate AMPA receptor trafficking to synaptic sites [78–80], while γ4 appears to be even more effective than stargazin at this function [81]. Furthermore, γ7 appears to be localized to signalling endosomes in neurons [82]. Hence, it may be reasonable to expect a similar trafficking function for neuronal calcium channels. However, most coexpression studies involving different types of γ subunits have revealed relatively subtle effects on channel function [77, 83–85]. One notable exception is γ7, which dramatically reduces N-type current density in transient expression systems [86]. The authors of this study showed that these effects were not mediated by alterations in channel trafficking, but instead appeared to occur as a result of altered channel expression. Along these lines, γ6 inhibits endogenous Cav3.1 T-type channels in an atrial cell line [87], however, once again, this effect does not appear to be mediated by alterations in channel trafficking, but instead by functional inhibition of channel activation [88, 89]. Altogether, it appears that γ subunits of neuronal voltage-gated calcium channels are not involved in membrane trafficking of either HVA or LVA calcium channels.

Calmodulin

Although calmodulin is a ubiquitous calcium sensing protein with numerous cellular functions, the fact that it is associated with every type of HVA calcium channel has led to suggestions this protein is a de facto calcium channel subunit. In the context of voltage-gated calcium channels calmodulin is recognized mainly for contributions to calcium-dependent inactivation (CDI) and calcium-dependent facilitation (CDF) [90, 91]. These calcium/calmodulin-dependent processes regulate calcium channel gating and open probability so that channel flux is reduced (CDI), or increased (CDF) in response to changing intracellular calcium [92]. Calcium/calmodulin can bind HVA, but not LVA Cavα1 subunits at multiple C-terminal sites, although a region referred to as the IQ domain is absolutely necessary for binding of calcium free Apo-calmodulin and for promoting CDI [93–96]. All Cav1 and Cav2 family members bind calcium/calmodulin and exhibit CDI, with the exception of Cav1.4, which binds calcium/calmodulin but is not functionally regulated [91, 97–101]. This insensitivity to CDI has been explained by the presence of a C-terminal modulator region in Cav1.4 that acts as an inhibitory domain (termed ICDI) [99, 102, 103]. The ICDI region does not disrupt calmodulin binding to Cav1.4, and if anything, calmodulin bound Cavα1.4 channels display a greater current density than IQ domain mutants unable to associate with calmodulin [104]. This suggests calmodulin can either increase conductance of Cav1.4 when bound to the IQ motif, or help traffic Cavα1.4 to the cell surface in an IQ-dependent manner.

The contribution of calcium/calmodulin to trafficking of other HVA calcium channels is controversial. Data from HEK-293 cells suggest calmodulin has no additive effect on Cav1.2 surface expression in either the presence, or the absence of ancillary β and/or α2δ subunits [105]. On the other hand, it has been shown in tsA-201 cells, that deleting the PreIQ3 region—a second sequence important for calcium/calmodulin binding just upstream of the IQ domain—in combination with an IQ deletion, is sufficient to completely abolish surface expression of Cav1.2 in the presence of β2a [106]. In COS1 cells, which are believed to be devoid of all VGCC auxiliary subunits, exogenous calmodulin increased surface expression and recovered activity of α2δ-free, and functionally silent Cav1.2/β2d channels [107]. Previous studies have shown that mutations in the EF-hand domain of Cav1.2 channels can drastically alter current density [2, 100, 108]. While it is possible that these mutations affect channel function rather than cell surface targeting [109, 110] it is probable that the lack of whole cell currents carried by some of these mutants arises from disruption of a calmodulin-dependent cell surface trafficking mechanism. In hippocampal neurons, Cav1.2 trafficking to the distal dendrites is accelerated by the presence of calcium/calmodulin, but not Apo-calmodulin [111]. The idea that calcium/calmodulin can influence the spatial and temporal distribution of channels, rather than just cell surface trafficking, is an intriguing possibility that requires further exploration.

As noted above, our laboratory has identified the C-terminal domains of Cav2.2 and Cav1.2 as putative ER retention regions [54]. The retained region of Cav2.2 contains an EF-hand motif, while the two retained portions of Cav1.2 contain the homologous EF-hand motif as well as a downstream IQ domain. Our observation that this downstream region of Cav1.2 spans the calmodulin-binding IQ domain supports literature that suggests this region of the channel has a role in surface expression [106]. Although it is not understood why the IQ containing region of Cav1.2 is retained in the ER while homologous regions of Cav2.1 and Cav2.2 are not, a possible explanation may lie in the different N and C lobe orientations of calmodulin when it is associated with each channel class [94]. Recent crystal structure data suggest that calcium/calmodulin exists in a 2:1 ratio with the Cav1.2 proximal C-terminus, a result exclusive to this channel [18, 112, 113], and perhaps in itself, can account for differences in ER retention among the channel subtypes. In addition to the C-terminal interaction sites, there is also an N-terminal calmodulin-binding domain that is present in Cav1.2, but which is absent from Cav2 channels [114, 115]. It is interesting to note in this context that Cav1.2 channels lacking the N-terminus appear to have a greater total abundance in COS1 cells [116]. It is thus possible that calmodulin-binding interactions with the N-terminus region contribute to modulation of L-type channel surface expression.

Although there is considerable evidence for functional regulation of HVA calcium channel activity by calcium/calmodulin, a role in regulating cell surface expression of calcium channels remains to be precisely elucidated.

T-type calcium channels

T-type calcium channels do not appear to associate with ancillary β and α2δ subunits, and pan-antisense depletion of β subunits from neuroblastoma cell lines does not alter T-type channel current densities [117], in contrast to HVA channels (see above). Yet, coexpression of Cav3 channels with β1b and/or α2δ-1 subunits in transient expression systems such as Xenopus oocytes or tsA-201 cells, results in increased whole cell current densities accompanied by increases in both cell surface and total protein expression [118, 119]. For Cav3.2 channels (but not for Cav3.1 and Cav3.3), the relative fraction of channels in the plasma membrane was increased, hinting at the possibility of either augmented Cav3.2 channel trafficking, or increased stability of these channels in the membrane [118]. It is possible that the formation of endocytic vesicles is reduced when the plasma membrane is overloaded with GPI anchored α2δ subunits.

Unlike with HVA calcium channels, the intrinsic trafficking mechanisms of T-type channels have remained relatively unexplored. Some insights into structural determinants of T-type channel trafficking have however, come from mutations found in Cav3.2 channels of patients with various forms of idiopathic generalized epilepsies (for review see [120]). When introduced into full-length channels, the vast majority of these mutations mediate only subtle effects on channel gating [121–125], raising the possibility that their role in pathophysiology may be linked to altered channel trafficking rather than changes in channel function. Indeed, in tsA-201 cells several of these Cav3.2 epilepsy mutants have been shown to increase cell surface expression of the channel [126], consistent with a gain of function and (in a physiological setting) neuronal hyperexcitability. Several of these mutations were confined to the domain I–II linker, indicating that the domain I–II linker may be an important T-type channel trafficking hotspot. This fits with observations that a specific splice variant of Cav3.1, which lacks a large portion of the I–II loop is more effectively transported to the plasma membrane [127]. Deletion of the central portion of the I–II linkers of Cav3.1 and Cav3.3 has been shown to, respectively, increase, and decrease cell surface expression of these two channels, once again supporting the domain I–II linker as a region that is involved in channel trafficking [128]. At the same time, these findings indicate that the role of this region varies with T-type channel isoform, and it should be noted that this region of the channel not only affects cell surface expression, but also channel gating (for review, see [129]). In summary, these findings indicate that the domain I–II loop is a regulator of T-type channel trafficking, but at this point it is unclear if this is due to enhanced ER export, or increased stability of the channels in the plasma membrane. Furthermore, it is possible that other regions of the channel may also be involved in the regulation of cell surface expression. Indeed, this may be of importance during pathophysiological states such as cardiac hypertrophy and seizure disorders where a switch of T-type domain III–IV linker channel splice isoforms has been shown to occur, although it remains to be determined if these variants alter channel trafficking in addition to documented effects on channel function [130, 131], for review see [132].

Two recent studies have identified the actin-binding protein Kelch-like 1 as a regulator of T-type channel expression [133, 134]). Coexpression of Cav3.1 and Cav3.2 T-type calcium channels with Kelch-like 1 was shown to enhance cell surface expression of these channels, in addition Kelch-like 1 could be co-immunoprecipitated with the channels [134]. While disruption of the actin cytoskeleton by itself did not affect T-type channel activity, the effects of Kelch-like 1 were lost under these circumstances, indicating that Kelch-like 1 regulates T-type channels in an actin F-dependent manner. The authors also showed that the mechanism of action involved an increased rate of re-insertion of T-type calcium channels from recycling endosomes [133]. It remains to be determined if Kelch-like 1 mediates its effect via binding to the domain I–II linker of the channel.

Trafficking of calcium channels to specific subcellular loci

Investigations of the subcellular distributions of voltage-gated calcium channels have primarily focused on neurons. Initial studies using channel subtype specific antibodies revealed that L-type calcium channels were expressed predominantly on cell bodies, whereas N-type and P/Q-type calcium channels were targeted to presynaptic sites [135–138]. While this general principle holds true, different types of calcium channel α1 subunits can be more broadly distributed depending on cell type. For example, in hippocampal neurons, Cav1.2 channels can be targeted to synaptic (both pre and post) and extrasynpatic compartments [139–141]. In cultured hippocampal neurons, Cav1.3 channels can be found at postsynaptic sites where they associate with the postsynaptic adaptor protein Shank [142]. In photoreceptors, Cav1.4 subunits are expressed at ribbon synapses where they are colocalized with bassoon [143]. The Cav1.3 isoform is also found at presynaptic sites in cochlear hair cells where it interacts with the protein Ribeye [144]. It is likely that interacting proteins such as Shank, Ribeye, and Bassoon are responsible for targeting the channels to these specific synaptic sites. Along these lines, N-type calcium channels are not just found presynaptically, as a dendritic co-localization of these channels with D1 dopamine receptors in prefrontal cortex neurons has been reported [145], with D1 receptors apparently defining the localization of the channels at these non-synaptic sites. A similar heterogeneity of calcium channel distribution has been reported for T-type channels, where different T-type calcium channel isoforms show distinct expression patterns depending on neuron subtype [146]. These issues are complicated further through alternate splicing of Cavα1 subunits, which can alter the subcellular targeting of a given calcium channel subtype, as illustrated for N-type calcium channels [147–149].

The mechanisms that define the subcellular trafficking of voltage-gated calcium channels are not well understood. Perhaps the most detailed investigations have focused on the synaptic targeting of N-type calcium channels. By using epitope tagged Cav2.2 constructs, as well as CD8 fusion constructs of intracellular Cav2.2 linkers, Maximov and Bezprozvanny showed that the C-terminus of the channel was a key structural region involved in the synaptic targeting of these channels, and that the formation of synaptic contact was a key requirement for channel trafficking [147]. The authors also showed that interactions of this region of the channel with Mint-1 and CASK were involved in synaptic targeting. Similar observations were obtained with an invertebrate homolog of Cav2 channels [150]. However, other regions of the channel also appear to be involved in synaptic targeting. Cav2.2 and Cav2.1 calcium channels contain a synaptic protein interaction (synprint) domain within the II–III linker region that interacts with synaptic proteins such as syntaxin-1, SNAP-25, and synaptotagmin 1 [151, 152]. These interactions may help couple channels to active release sites in addition to providing feedback regulation of channel activity [153–158]. Interestingly, transfer of the synprint region of Cav2.2 channels to Cav1.2 resulted in synaptic targeting of Cav1.2 [159], but see [160], suggesting that interactions of the channel with presynaptic proteins may act as a second synaptic targeting mechanism in addition to the CASK and Mint-1 interactions. Splice variants of N-type channels, which lack the synprint site have been identified in human brain [161]. When fused to green fluorescent protein and expressed in cultured hippocampal neurons, these splice variants were targeted to axonal sites, but failed to be effectively transported to presynaptic loci [160]. On the other hand, the aforementioned invertebrate Cav2.2 homolog lacks the synprint region altogether, yet targets to presynaptic sites [150]. Moreover, channels such as Cav1.4 and Cav1.3 do not contain a synprint motif, yet can be targeted to specialized synapses. These observations suggest that multiple regions and (perhaps redundant) protein interactions of the channel may be involved in defining its trafficking to synaptic sites. This issue is further complicated by the observation that different types of β subunits are targeted to distinct loci in autaptic hippocampal neurons. Specifically, β4 and β2a appear in clusters at synaptic sites, whereas other types of β subunits show a more diffuse distribution [162]. It is therefore possible that the association of channels with specific types of β subunits modulates trafficking contributions of the synprint and C-terminus regions.

Most of the targeting studies rely on overexpression of channel constructs in cultured neurons. The fact that presynaptic nerve terminals are relatively small and have a defined number of “slots” for N-type and P/Q-type calcium channels [163] must be taken into consideration when interpreting such overexpression studies. This issue was highlighted in a recent study by Cao and Tsien [164]. These authors showed that there are specific slots for N-type and P/Q-type channels in presynaptic terminal, and that N-type channels could displace P/Q-type channels from their slots, whereas P/Q-type channels could not be inserted in to N-type preferring slots. In practical terms, this means that the limited ability of synapses to accommodate overexpressed channels together with a channel preference of certain presynaptic sites could confound experimental results, under conditions of excessive overexpression of calcium channel subunits.

Calcium channel internalization and recycling

The total level of calcium channels protein in the plasma membrane is not only determined by export of channels and trafficking from the ER, but equally by the life time/stability of channels in the plasma membrane, and their recycling after internalization. Some hints at calcium channel stability come from antisense knockdown experiments in cultured cells and in vivo. For example, antisense depletion of β subunits in cultured dorsal root ganglion neurons produces maximal effects 4–5 days after injection of the oligonucleotides [49]. In vivo antisense knockdown of T-type or N-type calcium channels in dorsal root ganglion neurons produces physiological effect within days after intrathecal delivery [165, 166]. Altogether, this suggests that the stability of channel protein occurs on the order of tens of hours. This is also supported by kinetic studies investigating the rate of internalization of N-type channels containing Cav2.2 + β1b + α2δ, or just Cav2.2 + β1b [167]. Notably, the presence of α2δ slowed the internalization of the complex, suggesting that this subunit contributes to membrane stability of the channel. At this point it is unclear whether the Cavα1 subunit contains specific sequence motifs that are responsible for its internalization, and precisely how this process may be regulated by ancillary subunits. For example, the SH3 domain of the β subunit is able to enhance dynamin-dependent internalization of Cav1.2 [168]. In tsA-201 cells this process appears to result from dimerization of SH3 domains on opposing β subunits [169] (Fig. 3). As for in-built Cavα1 internalization signals, insights can perhaps be gleaned from a specific C-terminus splice variant of Cav2.2, which appears to be more readily internalized due to the existence of a YXLL internalization motif contained within the alternately spliced region [170].

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Internalization and recycling of Cav1 and Cav2 channel complexes. Cav1 channels undergo constitutive internalization via a β subunit-dependent interaction with dynamin. Internalization is regulated by Cavβ dimerization, and involves the SH3 domain of the β subunit. The β subunit protects Cav1.2 from Nedd4-1-mediated lysosomal degradation; however, it is unclear when Nedd4-1-mediated degradation occurs. Nedd4-1 could promote lysosomal degradation following channel internalization, or alternatively, during forward trafficking, post-ER. A protein traditionally associated with microtubule assembly, CRMP-2, has been shown to associate with the I–II linker of Cav2.2 and augment channel surface density. CRMP-2 is thought to be involved in Cav2.2 recycling, although this has yet to be shown. Activity driven internalization by sustained calcium influx leads to the recruitment of eIF3e, and subsequent internalization of L-type channels. Cav2.1/2.3 channels can also associate with eIF3e suggesting this means of internalization may be used by multiple, but not all channel types. Whether eIF3e internalization leads directly to lysosomal degradation has yet to be determined. Cav2.2 channels are internalized by prolonged activation of GPCRs, such as nociceptin, D1, and D2 dopamine receptors. GPCR coupled internalization can lead to lysosomal degradation, or recycling of the channel complex to the cell surface

Like mechanisms of internalization, processes that govern calcium channel recycling are poorly understood. A recent set of studies has identified collapsin response mediator protein 2 (CRMP-2) as a possible regulator of N-type channel recycling [171] (Fig. 3). This protein (which is best known for its role in microtubule assembly) associates with the domain I–II linker and C-terminus region of the channel, and its coexpression augments N-type currents. Conversely, disrupting these interactions results in reduced N-type channel density in the plasma membrane, and thereby mediates analgesic effects in vivo [172]. CRMP-2 has been shown to provide a link between endocytic proteins and the dynein motor complex [173], while its interactions with the N-type channels may suggest a mechanism for selective N-type channel insertion into the plasma membrane. Considering that the β subunit binds to the I–II linker, this may also open the possibility of a β subunit-dependent regulation of the recycling process. To our knowledge, this has not been explored.

Internalization of N-type channels can be facilitated by their association with G protein coupled receptors (Fig. 3). Our laboratory has shown that Cavα2.2 calcium channels physically associate with nociceptin receptors, as well as with D1 and D2 dopamine receptors [145, 174, 175]. Coexpression of the channel with these receptors appears to increase trafficking of the channels to the plasma membrane, but more strikingly, prolonged application of receptor agonist results in the internalization of channel receptor complexes, and in the case of nociceptin receptors, into lysosomes for possible degradation [176].

L-type calcium channels have been shown to undergo depolarization-induced internalization, while KCl-induced depolarization of hippocampal neurons results in a calcium-dependent decrease in Cav1.2 cell surface expression [177]. This effect was mediated by a recruitment of the tumor-repressor protein eIF3e to the domain II–III linker region of the channel, followed by trafficking of the channel complex to an endosomal compartment (Fig. 3). This mechanism may on the one hand serve to protect neurons from calcium overload during periods of intense activity. It is also possible that some of the internalized channels move into lysosomal compartments for degradation. Given that the isolated C-terminus of Cav1.2 may act as a transcription factor [178], this then may lead to the downstream activation of genes [179]. It should be noted, however, that depolarization-induced internalization was not observed in mature hippocampal neurons, suggesting the possibility that this process may be developmentally regulated [180].

In a related matter, it has been reported that prolonged activation of NMDA receptors via glutamate results in L-type channel internalization via a pathway controlled by the phosphoinositide kinase, PIKfyve [181]. Similar to the KCl-evoked internalization, such a mechanism may protect neurons from excessive calcium entry, but at this point it is not clear if this effect is modulated by the presence of ancillary calcium channel subunits. A possible role of β subunits in regulating channel stability may be supported by recent findings showing that the β subunit can protect Cav1.2 from proteasomal and lysosomal degradation by the ubiquitin ligase Nedd4-1, a process that occurs post-ER, and without detectable ubiquitination [182]. The Nedd4 family of ubiquitin ligases is known to modulate internalization of other ion channel proteins, and although this has not been directly tested for Cav1.2 it is a likely possibility [183–185]. Finally, a recent study reported that β4 subunits are targeted to the nucleus of cerebellar granule cells and Purkinje neurons [186]. The authors of this study used dysgenic myotubes to show that nuclear targeting was modulated by L-type channel activity, but unlike L-type channel internalization in hippocampal neurons, activity and calcium inhibited nuclear targeting of the β4 subunit. Nuclear targeting of β subunits, which is dependent on calcium channel activity may provide yet another pathway for L-type channel-mediated regulation of gene transcription.

Concluding remarks

The trafficking of voltage-gated calcium channels to and from the plasma membrane is an important means for regulating calcium entry into electrically excitable cells. In order to fulfill specialized cellular functions, different types of calcium channels are trafficked to particular subcellular loci where they can shape electrical activity, or provide local calcium signaling events, which are linked to specific physiological outputs such as neurotransmitter release. Trafficking of channels involves interactions with ancillary subunits and a host of other regulatory proteins that are localized in various intracellular and plasma membrane compartments. While we have highlighted many of the known mechanisms that control calcium channel trafficking, there are a number of additional interacting proteins, which are known to positively or negatively affect the membrane expression of channels, including A-Kinase Anchoring Proteins and small GTPases [187–189], and it is likely that many more will be discovered. This altogether underlines the complexity of calcium channel trafficking, and the difficulty in studying the underlying mechanism under physiological conditions. Detailed knowledge of these mechanisms can potentially identify novel agents that regulate cell surface density of calcium channels in neurons and ultimately give rise to therapeutic agents, as evidenced by the analgesic effects of CRMP-2 interfering peptides [172].

Acknowledgments

Work from our laboratory that we discussed here was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council, and the Heart of Stroke Foundation of Alberta and the Northwest Territories. BAS is supported by a studentship from Alberta Innovates-Health Solutions (AI-HS). GWZ is an AI-HS Scientist and a Canada Research Chair.

References

  • 1.Wheeler DB, Randall A, Tsien RW. Roles of N-type and Q-type Ca2+ channels in supporting hippocampal synaptic transmission. Science. 1994;264(5155):107–111. doi: 10.1126/science.7832825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dolmetsch RE, et al. Signalling to the nucleus by an L-type calcium channel-calmodulin complex through the MAP kinase pathway. Science. 2001;294(5541):333–339. doi: 10.1126/science.1063395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tully K, Treistman SN. Distinct intracellular calcium profiles following influx through N- versus L-type calcium channels: role of Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release. J Neurophysiol. 2004;92(1):135–143. doi: 10.1152/jn.01004.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Goonasekera SA, Chen SR, Dirksen RT. Reconstitution of local Ca2+ signalling between cardiac L-type Ca2+ channels and ryanodine receptors: insights into regulation by FKBP12.6. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2005;289(6):C1476–C1484. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00250.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Seisenberger C, et al. Functional embryonic cardiomyocytes after disruption of the L-type alpha1C (Cav1.2) calcium channel gene in the mouse. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(50):39193–39199. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M006467200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cooper PJ, Soeller C, Cannell MB. Excitation-contraction coupling in human heart failure examined by action potential clamp in rat cardiac myocytes. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2010;49(6):911–917. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2010.04.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wheeler DG, et al. CaMKII locally encodes L-type channel activity to signal to nuclear CREB in excitation-transcription coupling. J Cell Biol. 2008;183(5):849–863. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200805048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Comunanza V, et al. CaV1.3 as pacemaker channels in adrenal chromaffin cells: specific role on exo- and endocytosis? Channels (Austin) 2010;4(6):440–446. doi: 10.4161/chan.4.6.12866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Catterall WA (2011) Voltage-gated calcium channels. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 3(8) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 10.Szydlowska K, Tymianski M. Calcium, ischemia and excitotoxicity. Cell Calcium. 2010;47(2):122–129. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2010.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bean BP. Classes of calcium channels in vertebrate cells. Annu Rev Physiol. 1989;51:367–384. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.51.030189.002055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tsien RW, et al. Multiple types of neuronal calcium channels and their selective modulation. Trends Neurosci. 1988;11(10):431–438. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(88)90194-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Catterall WA, et al. International Union of Pharmacology. XLVIII. Nomenclature and structure-function relationships of voltage-gated calcium channels. Pharmacol Rev. 2005;57(4):411–425. doi: 10.1124/pr.57.4.5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Takahashi M, et al. Subunit structure of dihydropyridine-sensitive calcium channels from skeletal muscle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987;84(15):5478–5482. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.15.5478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ahlijanian MK, Westenbroek RE, Catterall WA. Subunit structure and localization of dihydropyridine-sensitive calcium channels in mammalian brain, spinal cord, and retina. Neuron. 1990;4(6):819–832. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(90)90135-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Witcher DR, et al. Subunit identification and reconstitution of the N-type Ca2+ channel complex purified from brain. Science. 1993;261(5120):486–489. doi: 10.1126/science.8392754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Catterall WA. Structure and regulation of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2000;16:521–555. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.16.1.521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Minor DL, Jr, Findeisen F. Progress in the structural understanding of voltage-gated calcium channel (CaV) function and modulation. Channels (Austin) 2010;4(6):459–474. doi: 10.4161/chan.4.6.12867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Catterall WA. Ion channel voltage sensors: structure, function, and pathophysiology. Neuron. 2010;67(6):915–928. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.08.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Stotz SC, Jarvis SE, Zamponi GW. Functional roles of cytoplasmic loops and pore lining transmembrane helices in the voltage-dependent inactivation of HVA calcium channels. J Physiol. 2004;554(Pt 2):263–273. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.047068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yang J, et al. Molecular determinants of Ca2+ selectivity and ion permeation in L-type Ca2+ channels. Nature. 1993;366(6451):158–161. doi: 10.1038/366158a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Stea A, et al. A beta-subunit normalizes the electrophysiological properties of a cloned N-type Ca2+ channel alpha 1-subunit. Neuropharmacology. 1993;32(11):1103–1116. doi: 10.1016/0028-3908(93)90005-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Qin N, et al. Unique regulatory properties of the type 2a Ca2+ channel beta subunit caused by palmitoylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95(8):4690–4695. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.8.4690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Feng ZP, et al. Calcium channel beta subunits differentially regulate the inhibition of N-type channels by individual Gbeta isoforms. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(48):45051–45058. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M107784200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhang Y, et al. Origin of the voltage dependence of G-protein regulation of P/Q-type Ca2+ channels. J Neurosci. 2008;28(52):14176–14188. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1350-08.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Buraei Z, Yang J. The Beta subunit of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels. Physiol Rev. 2010;90(4):1461–1506. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00057.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Richards MW, Butcher AJ, Dolphin AC. Ca2+ channel beta-subunits: structural insights AID our understanding. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2004;25(12):626–632. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2004.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Pragnell M, et al. Calcium channel beta-subunit binds to a conserved motif in the I–II cytoplasmic linker of the alpha 1-subunit. Nature. 1994;368(6466):67–70. doi: 10.1038/368067a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.De Waard M, et al. Properties of the alpha 1-beta anchoring site in voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels. J Biol Chem. 1995;270(20):12056–12064. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.20.12056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Opatowsky Y, et al. Structural analysis of the voltage-dependent calcium channel beta subunit functional core and its complex with the alpha 1 interaction domain. Neuron. 2004;42(3):387–399. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(04)00250-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Van Petegem F, et al. Structure of a complex between a voltage-gated calcium channel beta-subunit and an alpha-subunit domain. Nature. 2004;429(6992):671–675. doi: 10.1038/nature02588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Maltez JM, et al. Essential Ca(V)beta modulatory properties are AID-independent. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2005;12(4):372–377. doi: 10.1038/nsmb909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.McGee AW, et al. Calcium channel function regulated by the SH3-GK module in beta subunits. Neuron. 2004;42(1):89–99. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(04)00149-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Takahashi SX, Miriyala J, Colecraft HM. Membrane-associated guanylate kinase-like properties of beta-subunits required for modulation of voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101(18):7193–7198. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0306665101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Chien AJ, et al. Identification of palmitoylation sites within the L-type calcium channel beta2a subunit and effects on channel function. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(43):26465–26468. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.43.26465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Klugbauer N, Marais E, Hofmann F. Calcium channel alpha2delta subunits: differential expression, function, and drug binding. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 2003;35(6):639–647. doi: 10.1023/b:jobb.0000008028.41056.58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Davies A, et al. The alpha2delta subunits of voltage-gated calcium channels form GPI-anchored proteins, a posttranslational modification essential for function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107(4):1654–1659. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0908735107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bauer CS, et al. A new look at calcium channel alpha2delta subunits. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2010;20(5):563–571. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2010.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Robinson P, et al. Targeting of voltage-gated calcium channel alpha2delta-1 subunit to lipid rafts is independent from a GPI-anchoring motif. PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e19802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Bourinet E, et al. Splicing of alpha 1A subunit gene generates phenotypic variants of P- and Q-type calcium channels. Nat Neurosci. 1999;2(5):407–415. doi: 10.1038/8070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Chemin J, et al. Alternatively spliced alpha(1G) (Ca(V)3.1) intracellular loops promote specific T-type Ca(2+) channel gating properties. Biophys J. 2001;80(3):1238–1250. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)76100-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Tang ZZ, et al. Transcript scanning reveals novel and extensive splice variations in human l-type voltage-gated calcium channel, Cav1.2 alpha1 subunit. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(43):44335–44343. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M407023200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Takahashi SX, Mittman S, Colecraft HM. Distinctive modulatory effects of five human auxiliary beta2 subunit splice variants on L-type calcium channel gating. Biophys J. 2003;84(5):3007–3021. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)70027-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Gray AC, Raingo J, Lipscombe D. Neuronal calcium channels: splicing for optimal performance. Cell Calcium. 2007;42(4–5):409–417. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2007.04.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Allen SE, Darnell RB, Lipscombe D. The neuronal splicing factor Nova controls alternative splicing in N-type and P-type CaV2 calcium channels. Channels (Austin) 2010;4(6):483–489. doi: 10.4161/chan.4.6.12868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Liao P, Zhang HY, Soong TW. Alternative splicing of voltage-gated calcium channels: from molecular biology to disease. Pflugers Arch. 2009;458(3):481–487. doi: 10.1007/s00424-009-0635-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Perez-Reyes E. Molecular physiology of low-voltage-activated t-type calcium channels. Physiol Rev. 2003;83(1):117–161. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00018.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Perez-Reyes E, et al. Molecular characterization of a neuronal low-voltage-activated T-type calcium channel. Nature. 1998;391(6670):896–900. doi: 10.1038/36110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Berrow NS, et al. Antisense depletion of beta-subunits modulates the biophysical and pharmacological properties of neuronal calcium channels. J Physiol. 1995;482(Pt 3):481–491. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1995.sp020534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.De Waard M, Pragnell M, Campbell KP. Ca2+ channel regulation by a conserved beta subunit domain. Neuron. 1994;13(2):495–503. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(94)90363-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Bichet D, et al. The I–II loop of the Ca2+ channel alpha1 subunit contains an endoplasmic reticulum retention signal antagonized by the beta subunit. Neuron. 2000;25(1):177–190. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80881-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Obermair GJ, et al. Reciprocal interactions regulate targeting of calcium channel beta subunits and membrane expression of alpha1 subunits in cultured hippocampal neurons. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(8):5776–5791. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.044271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Leroy J, et al. Interaction via a key tryptophan in the I-II linker of N-type calcium channels is required for beta1 but not for palmitoylated beta2, implicating an additional binding site in the regulation of channel voltage-dependent properties. J Neurosci. 2005;25(30):6984–6996. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1137-05.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Altier C, et al. The Cavbeta subunit prevents RFP2-mediated ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of L-type channels. Nat Neurosci. 2011;14(2):173–180. doi: 10.1038/nn.2712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Fang K, Colecraft HM (2011) Mechanism of auxiliary β-subunit-mediated membrane targeting of L-type (Cav1.2) channels. J Physiol [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 56.Ye Y, et al. A membrane protein complex mediates retro-translocation from the ER lumen into the cytosol. Nature. 2004;429(6994):841–847. doi: 10.1038/nature02656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Romisch K. Endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2005;21:435–456. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.21.012704.133250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Waithe D, et al. Beta-subunits promote the expression of Ca(V)2.2 channels by reducing their proteasomal degradation. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(11):9598–9611. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.195909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Yasuda T, et al. Auxiliary subunit regulation of high-voltage activated calcium channels expressed in mammalian cells. Eur J Neurosci. 2004;20(1):1–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03434.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Gee NS, et al. The novel anticonvulsant drug, gabapentin (Neurontin), binds to the alpha2delta subunit of a calcium channel. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(10):5768–5776. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.10.5768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Taylor CP, Angelotti T, Fauman E. Pharmacology and mechanism of action of pregabalin: the calcium channel alpha2-delta (alpha2-delta) subunit as a target for antiepileptic drug discovery. Epilepsy Res. 2007;73(2):137–150. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2006.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Field MJ, Li Z, Schwarz JB. Ca2+ channel alpha2-delta ligands for the treatment of neuropathic pain. J Med Chem. 2007;50(11):2569–2575. doi: 10.1021/jm060650z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Moore RA, et al. Gabapentin for chronic neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;16(3):CD007938. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007938.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Mould J, et al. The alpha2delta auxiliary subunit reduces affinity of omega-conotoxins for recombinant N-type (Cav2.2) calcium channels. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(33):34705–34714. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M310848200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Canti C, et al. The metal-ion-dependent adhesion site in the Von Willebrand factor-A domain of alpha2delta subunits is key to trafficking voltage-gated Ca2 + channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102(32):11230–11235. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504183102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Barclay J, et al. Ducky mouse phenotype of epilepsy and ataxia is associated with mutations in the Cacna2d2 gene and decreased calcium channel current in cerebellar Purkinje cells. J Neurosci. 2001;21(16):6095–6104. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-16-06095.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Fuller-Bicer GA, et al. Targeted disruption of the voltage-dependent calcium channel alpha2/delta-1-subunit. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2009;297(1):H117–H124. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00122.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Neely GG, et al. A genome-wide Drosophila screen for heat nociception identifies alpha2delta3 as an evolutionarily conserved pain gene. Cell. 2010;143(4):628–638. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Field MJ, et al. Identification of the alpha2-delta-1 subunit of voltage-dependent calcium channels as a molecular target for pain mediating the analgesic actions of pregabalin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103(46):17537–17542. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0409066103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Uchitel OD, et al. Acute modulation of calcium currents and synaptic transmission by gabapentinoids. Channels (Austin) 2010;4(6):490–496. doi: 10.4161/chan.4.6.12864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Hendrich J, et al. Pharmacological disruption of calcium channel trafficking by the alpha2delta ligand gabapentin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105(9):3628–3633. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0708930105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Bauer CS, et al. The increased trafficking of the calcium channel subunit alpha2delta-1 to presynaptic terminals in neuropathic pain is inhibited by the alpha2delta ligand pregabalin. J Neurosci. 2009;29(13):4076–4088. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0356-09.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Tran-Van-Minh A, Dolphin AC. The alpha2delta ligand gabapentin inhibits the Rab11-dependent recycling of the calcium channel subunit alpha2delta-2. J Neurosci. 2010;30(38):12856–12867. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2700-10.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Obermair GJ, et al. The Ca2+ channel alpha2delta-1 subunit determines Ca2+ current kinetics in skeletal muscle but not targeting of alpha1S or excitation-contraction coupling. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(3):2229–2237. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M411501200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Obermair GJ, Tuluc P, Flucher BE. Auxiliary Ca(2+) channel subunits: lessons learned from muscle. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2008;8(3):311–318. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2008.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Gach MP, et al. Alpha2delta1 dihydropyridine receptor subunit is a critical element for excitation-coupled calcium entry but not for formation of tetrads in skeletal myotubes. Biophys J. 2008;94(8):3023–3034. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.107.118893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Letts VA, et al. The mouse stargazer gene encodes a neuronal Ca2+-channel gamma subunit. Nat Genet. 1998;19(4):340–347. doi: 10.1038/1228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Chen L, et al. Stargazin regulates synaptic targeting of AMPA receptors by two distinct mechanisms. Nature. 2000;408(6815):936–943. doi: 10.1038/35050030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Tomita S, et al. Stargazin modulates AMPA receptor gating and trafficking by distinct domains. Nature. 2005;435(7045):1052–1058. doi: 10.1038/nature03624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Kato AS, et al. TARPs differentially decorate AMPA receptors to specify neuropharmacology. Trends Neurosci. 2010;33(5):241–248. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2010.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Korber C, et al. The transmembrane AMPA receptor regulatory protein gamma 4 is a more effective modulator of AMPA receptor function than stargazin (gamma 2) J Neurosci. 2007;27(31):8442–8447. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0424-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Waithe D, Ferron L, Dolphin AC. Stargazin-related protein {gamma}7 is associated with signalling endosomes in superior cervical ganglion neurons and modulates neurite outgrowth. J Cell Sci. 2011;124(Pt 12):2049–2057. doi: 10.1242/jcs.084988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Rousset M, et al. Functional roles of gamma2, gamma3 and gamma4, three new Ca2+ channel subunits, in P/Q-type Ca2+ channel expressed in Xenopus oocytes. J Physiol. 2001;532(Pt 3):583–593. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.0583e.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Tselnicker I, et al. Stargazin modulates neuronal voltage-dependent Ca(2+) channel Ca(v)2.2 by a Gbetagamma-dependent mechanism. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(27):20462–20471. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.121277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Tselnicker I, Dascal N. Further characterization of regulation of Ca(V)2.2 by stargazin. Channels (Austin) 2010;4(5):351–354. doi: 10.4161/chan.4.5.13504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Moss FJ, et al. The novel product of a five-exon stargazin-related gene abolishes Ca(V)2.2 calcium channel expression. Embo J. 2002;21(7):1514–1523. doi: 10.1093/emboj/21.7.1514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Hansen JP, et al. Calcium channel gamma6 subunits are unique modulators of low voltage-activated (Cav3.1) calcium current. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2004;37(6):1147–1158. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2004.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Lin Z, et al. A critical GxxxA motif in the gamma6 calcium channel subunit mediates its inhibitory effect on Cav3.1 calcium current. J Physiol. 2008;586(Pt 22):5349–5366. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2008.159111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Chen RS, Best PM. A small peptide inhibitor of the low voltage-activated calcium channel Cav3.1. Mol Pharmacol. 2009;75(5):1042–1051. doi: 10.1124/mol.108.052654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.DeMaria CD, et al. Calmodulin bifurcates the local Ca2+ signal that modulates P/Q-type Ca2+ channels. Nature. 2001;411(6836):484–489. doi: 10.1038/35078091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Liang H, et al. Unified mechanisms of Ca2+ regulation across the Ca2+ channel family. Neuron. 2003;39(6):951–960. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00560-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Halling DB, Aracena-Parks P, Hamilton SL. Regulation of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels by calmodulin. Sci STKE. 2005;2005(315):re15. doi: 10.1126/stke.3152005re15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Black DJ, et al. Calmodulin interactions with IQ peptides from voltage-dependent calcium channels. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2005;288(3):C669–C676. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00191.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Kim EY, et al. Structures of CaV2 Ca2+/CaM-IQ domain complexes reveal binding modes that underlie calcium-dependent inactivation and facilitation. Structure. 2008;16(10):1455–1467. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2008.07.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Tang W, et al. Apocalmodulin and Ca2+ calmodulin-binding sites on the CaV1.2 channel. Biophys J. 2003;85(3):1538–1547. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3495(03)74586-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Erickson MG, et al. Preassociation of calmodulin with voltage-gated Ca(2+) channels revealed by FRET in single living cells. Neuron. 2001;31(6):973–985. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00438-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Stroffekova K. Ca2+/CaM-dependent inactivation of the skeletal muscle L-type Ca2+ channel (Cav1.1) Pflugers Arch. 2008;455(5):873–884. doi: 10.1007/s00424-007-0344-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Bell DC, et al. Biophysical properties, pharmacology, and modulation of human, neuronal L-type (alpha(1D), Ca(V)1.3) voltage-dependent calcium currents. J Neurophysiol. 2001;85(2):816–827. doi: 10.1152/jn.2001.85.2.816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Hoda JC, et al. Effects of congenital stationary night blindness type 2 mutations R508Q and L1364H on Cav1.4 L-type Ca2+ channel function and expression. J Neurochem. 2006;96(6):1648–1658. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.03678.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Peterson BZ, et al. Critical determinants of Ca(2+)-dependent inactivation within an EF-hand motif of L-type Ca(2+) channels. Biophys J. 2000;78(4):1906–1920. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76739-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Zuhlke RD, et al. Calmodulin supports both inactivation and facilitation of L-type calcium channels. Nature. 1999;399(6732):159–162. doi: 10.1038/20200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Singh A, et al. C-terminal modulator controls Ca2+-dependent gating of Ca(v)1.4 L-type Ca2+ channels. Nat Neurosci. 2006;9(9):1108–1116. doi: 10.1038/nn1751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Wahl-Schott C, et al. Switching off calcium-dependent inactivation in L-type calcium channels by an autoinhibitory domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103(42):15657–15662. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0604621103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Griessmeier K, et al. Calmodulin is a functional regulator of Cav1.4 L-type Ca2+ channels. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(43):29809–29816. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.048082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Bourdin B, et al. Molecular determinants of the CaVbeta-induced plasma membrane targeting of the CaV1.2 channel. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(30):22853–22863. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.111062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Gao T, et al. Role of the C terminus of the alpha 1C (CaV1.2) subunit in membrane targeting of cardiac L-type calcium channels. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(33):25436–25444. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M003465200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Ravindran A, et al. Functional properties of the CaV1.2 calcium channel activated by calmodulin in the absence of alpha2delta subunits. Channels (Austin) 2009;3(1):25–31. doi: 10.4161/chan.3.1.7498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Bernatchez G, Talwar D, Parent L. Mutations in the EF-hand motif impair the inactivation of barium currents of the cardiac alpha1C channel. Biophys J. 1998;75(4):1727–1739. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77614-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Brunet S, Scheuer T, Catterall WA. Cooperative regulation of Ca(v)1.2 channels by intracellular Mg(2+), the proximal C-terminal EF-hand, and the distal C-terminal domain. J Gen Physiol. 2009;134(2):81–94. doi: 10.1085/jgp.200910209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Brunet S, et al. Modulation of CaV1.2 channels by Mg2+ acting at an EF-hand motif in the COOH-terminal domain. J Gen Physiol. 2005;126(4):311–323. doi: 10.1085/jgp.200509333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Wang HG, et al. Ca2+/calmodulin regulates trafficking of Ca(V)1.2 Ca2+ channels in cultured hippocampal neurons. J Neurosci. 2007;27(34):9086–9093. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1720-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Fallon JL, et al. Crystal structure of dimeric cardiac L-type calcium channel regulatory domains bridged by Ca2+* calmodulins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(13):5135–5140. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0807487106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Kim EY, et al. Multiple C-terminal tail Ca(2+)/CaMs regulate Ca(V)1.2 function but do not mediate channel dimerization. Embo J. 2010;29(23):3924–3938. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2010.260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Benmocha A, et al. Characterization of the calmodulin-binding site in the N terminus of CaV1.2. Channels (Austin) 2009;3(5):337–342. doi: 10.4161/chan.3.5.9686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Dick IE, et al. A modular switch for spatial Ca2+ selectivity in the calmodulin regulation of CaV channels. Nature. 2008;451(7180):830–834. doi: 10.1038/nature06529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Kobrinsky E, et al. Differential role of the alpha1C subunit tails in regulation of the Cav1.2 channel by membrane potential, beta subunits, and Ca2+ ions. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(13):12474–12485. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M412140200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Leuranguer V, et al. Antisense depletion of beta-subunits fails to affect T-type calcium channels properties in a neuroblastoma cell line. Neuropharmacology. 1998;37(6):701–708. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3908(98)00060-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Dubel SJ, et al. Plasma membrane expression of T-type calcium channel alpha(1) subunits is modulated by high voltage-activated auxiliary subunits. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(28):29263–29269. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M313450200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Dolphin AC, et al. The effect of alpha2-delta and other accessory subunits on expression and properties of the calcium channel alpha1G. J Physiol. 1999;519(Pt 1):35–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.0035o.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Khosravani H, Zamponi GW. Voltage-gated calcium channels and idiopathic generalized epilepsies. Physiol Rev. 2006;86(3):941–966. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00002.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Khosravani H, et al. Gating effects of mutations in the Cav3.2 T-type calcium channel associated with childhood absence epilepsy. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(11):9681–9684. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C400006200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Peloquin JB, et al. Functional analysis of Ca3.2 T-type calcium channel mutations linked to childhood absence epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2006;47(3):655–658. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00482.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Heron SE, et al. Extended spectrum of idiopathic generalized epilepsies associated with CACNA1H functional variants. Ann Neurol. 2007;62(6):560–568. doi: 10.1002/ana.21169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Khosravani H, et al. Effects of Cav3.2 channel mutations linked to idiopathic generalized epilepsy. Ann Neurol. 2005;57(5):745–749. doi: 10.1002/ana.20458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Vitko I, et al. Functional characterization and neuronal modeling of the effects of childhood absence epilepsy variants of CACNA1H, a T-type calcium channel. J Neurosci. 2005;25(19):4844–4855. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0847-05.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Vitko I, et al. The I-II loop controls plasma membrane expression and gating of Ca(v)3.2 T-type Ca2 + channels: a paradigm for childhood absence epilepsy mutations. J Neurosci. 2007;27(2):322–330. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1817-06.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Shcheglovitov A, et al. Alternative splicing within the I–II loop controls surface expression of T-type Ca(v)3.1 calcium channels. FEBS Lett. 2008;582(27):3765–3770. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2008.10.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Baumgart JP, et al. I–II loop structural determinants in the gating and surface expression of low voltage-activated calcium channels. PLoS One. 2008;3(8):e2976. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Perez-Reyes E. Characterization of the gating brake in the I-II loop of CaV3 T-type calcium channels. Channels (Austin) 2010;4(6):453–458. doi: 10.4161/chan.4.6.12889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.David LS, et al. Splice-variant changes of the Ca(V)3.2 T-type calcium channel mediate voltage-dependent facilitation and associate with cardiac hypertrophy and development. Channels (Austin) 2010;4(5):375–389. doi: 10.4161/chan.4.5.12874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Powell KL, et al. A Cav3.2 T-type calcium channel point mutation has splice-variant-specific effects on function and segregates with seizure expression in a polygenic rat model of absence epilepsy. J Neurosci. 2009;29(2):371–380. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5295-08.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Cain SM, Snutch TP. Contributions of T-type calcium channel isoforms to neuronal firing. Channels (Austin) 2010;4(6):475–482. doi: 10.4161/chan.4.6.14106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Aromolaran KA, et al. Kelch-like 1 protein upregulates T-type currents by an actin-F dependent increase in alpha(1H) channels via the recycling endosome. Channels (Austin) 2009;3(6):402–412. doi: 10.4161/chan.3.6.9858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Aromolaran KA, et al. T-type current modulation by the actin-binding protein Kelch-like 1. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2010;298(6):C1353–C1362. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00235.2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Westenbroek RE, et al. Biochemical properties and subcellular distribution of an N-type calcium channel alpha 1 subunit. Neuron. 1992;9(6):1099–1115. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(92)90069-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Westenbroek RE, Hoskins L, Catterall WA. Localization of Ca2+ channel subtypes on rat spinal motor neurons, interneurons, and nerve terminals. J Neurosci. 1998;18(16):6319–6330. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-16-06319.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Westenbroek RE, et al. Immunochemical identification and subcellular distribution of the alpha 1A subunits of brain calcium channels. J Neurosci. 1995;15(10):6403–6418. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-10-06403.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Hell JW, et al. Identification and differential subcellular localization of the neuronal class C and class D L-type calcium channel alpha 1 subunits. J Cell Biol. 1993;123(4):949–962. doi: 10.1083/jcb.123.4.949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Davare MA, et al. A beta2 adrenergic receptor signalling complex assembled with the Ca2 + channel Cav1.2. Science. 2001;293(5527):98–101. doi: 10.1126/science.293.5527.98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Obermair GJ, et al. Differential targeting of the L-type Ca2+ channel alpha 1C (CaV1.2) to synaptic and extrasynaptic compartments in hippocampal neurons. Eur J Neurosci. 2004;19(8):2109–2122. doi: 10.1111/j.0953-816X.2004.03272.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Tippens AL, et al. Ultrastructural evidence for pre- and postsynaptic localization of Cav1.2 L-type Ca2+ channels in the rat hippocampus. J Comp Neurol. 2008;506(4):569–583. doi: 10.1002/cne.21567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Zhang H, et al. Association of CaV1.3 L-type calcium channels with Shank. J Neurosci. 2005;25(5):1037–1049. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4554-04.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Morgans CW. Localization of the alpha(1F) calcium channel subunit in the rat retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42(10):2414–2418. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Sheets L, et al. Ribeye is required for presynaptic Ca(V)1.3a channel localization and afferent innervation of sensory hair cells. Development. 2011;138(7):1309–1319. doi: 10.1242/dev.059451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Kisilevsky AE, et al. D1 receptors physically interact with N-type calcium channels to regulate channel distribution and dendritic calcium entry. Neuron. 2008;58(4):557–570. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.McKay BE, et al. Ca(V)3 T-type calcium channel isoforms differentially distribute to somatic and dendritic compartments in rat central neurons. Eur J Neurosci. 2006;24(9):2581–2594. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.05136.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Maximov A, Bezprozvanny I. Synaptic targeting of N-type calcium channels in hippocampal neurons. J Neurosci. 2002;22(16):6939–6952. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-16-06939.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Gardezi SR, Taylor P, Stanley EF. Long C terminal splice variant CaV2.2 identified in presynaptic membrane by mass spectrometric analysis. Channels (Austin) 2010;4(1):58–62. doi: 10.4161/chan.4.1.10364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Khanna R, et al. Long splice variant N type calcium channels are clustered at presynaptic transmitter release sites without modular adaptor proteins. Neuroscience. 2006;138(4):1115–1125. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.12.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Spafford JD, et al. Calcium channel structural determinants of synaptic transmission between identified invertebrate neurons. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(6):4258–4267. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M211076200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Rettig J, et al. Isoform-specific interaction of the alpha1A subunits of brain Ca2+ channels with the presynaptic proteins syntaxin and SNAP-25. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93(14):7363–7368. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.14.7363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Sheng ZH, Yokoyama CT, Catterall WA. Interaction of the synprint site of N-type Ca2+ channels with the C2B domain of synaptotagmin I. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94(10):5405–5410. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.10.5405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Mochida S, et al. Evidence for a voltage-dependent enhancement of neurotransmitter release mediated via the synaptic protein interaction site of N-type Ca2+ channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95(24):14523–14528. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.24.14523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Zhong H, et al. Reciprocal regulation of P/Q-type Ca2+ channels by SNAP-25, syntaxin and synaptotagmin. Nat Neurosci. 1999;2(11):939–941. doi: 10.1038/14721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Bezprozvanny I, Scheller RH, Tsien RW. Functional impact of syntaxin on gating of N-type and Q-type calcium channels. Nature. 1995;378(6557):623–626. doi: 10.1038/378623a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Jarvis SE, Zamponi GW. Distinct molecular determinants govern syntaxin 1A-mediated inactivation and G-protein inhibition of N-type calcium channels. J Neurosci. 2001;21(9):2939–2948. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-09-02939.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Jarvis SE, et al. Molecular determinants of syntaxin 1 modulation of N-type calcium channels. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(46):44399–44407. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M206902200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Stanley EF. Syntaxin I modulation of presynaptic calcium channel inactivation revealed by botulinum toxin C1. Eur J Neurosci. 2003;17(6):1303–1305. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02536.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Mochida S, et al. Requirement for the synaptic protein interaction site for reconstitution of synaptic transmission by P/Q-type calcium channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100(5):2819–2824. doi: 10.1073/pnas.262787699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Szabo Z, et al. Role of the synprint site in presynaptic targeting of the calcium channel CaV2.2 in hippocampal neurons. Eur J Neurosci. 2006;24(3):709–718. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04947.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Kaneko S, et al. Identification and characterization of novel human Ca(v)2.2 (alpha 1B) calcium channel variants lacking the synaptic protein interaction site. J Neurosci. 2002;22(1):82–92. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-01-00082.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Xie M, et al. Facilitation versus depression in cultured hippocampal neurons determined by targeting of Ca2+ channel Cavbeta4 versus Cavbeta2 subunits to synaptic terminals. J Cell Biol. 2007;178(3):489–502. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200702072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Cao YQ, et al. Presynaptic Ca2+ channels compete for channel type-preferring slots in altered neurotransmission arising from Ca2+ channelopathy. Neuron. 2004;43(3):387–400. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.07.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Cao YQ, Tsien RW. Different relationship of N- and P/Q-type Ca2+ channels to channel-interacting slots in controlling neurotransmission at cultured hippocampal synapses. J Neurosci. 2010;30(13):4536–4546. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5161-09.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Bourinet E, et al. Silencing of the Cav3.2 T-type calcium channel gene in sensory neurons demonstrates its major role in nociception. Embo J. 2005;24(2):315–324. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Altier C, et al. Differential role of N-type calcium channel splice isoforms in pain. J Neurosci. 2007;27(24):6363–6373. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0307-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Bernstein GM, Jones OT. Kinetics of internalization and degradation of N-type voltage-gated calcium channels: role of the alpha2/delta subunit. Cell Calcium. 2007;41(1):27–40. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2006.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Gonzalez-Gutierrez G, et al. The Src homology 3 domain of the beta-subunit of voltage-gated calcium channels promotes endocytosis via dynamin interaction. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(4):2156–2162. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M609071200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Miranda-Laferte E, et al. Homodimerization of the Src homology 3 domain of the calcium channel {beta}-subunit drives dynamin-dependent endocytosis. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(25):22203–22210. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.201871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Raingo J, Castiglioni AJ, Lipscombe D. Alternative splicing controls G protein-dependent inhibition of N-type calcium channels in nociceptors. Nat Neurosci. 2007;10(3):285–292. doi: 10.1038/nn1848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Brittain JM, et al. An atypical role for collapsin response mediator protein 2 (CRMP-2) in neurotransmitter release via interaction with presynaptic voltage-gated calcium channels. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(45):31375–31390. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.009951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Brittain JM, et al. Suppression of inflammatory and neuropathic pain by uncoupling CRMP-2 from the presynaptic Ca(2+) channel complex. Nat Med. 2011;17(7):822–829. doi: 10.1038/nm.2345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Rahajeng J, et al. Collapsin response mediator protein-2 (Crmp2) regulates trafficking by linking endocytic regulatory proteins to dynein motors. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(42):31918–31922. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C110.166066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Beedle AM, et al. Agonist-independent modulation of N-type calcium channels by ORL1 receptors. Nat Neurosci. 2004;7(2):118–125. doi: 10.1038/nn1180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Kisilevsky AE, Zamponi GW. D2 dopamine receptors interact directly with N-type calcium channels and regulate channel surface expression levels. Channels (Austin) 2008;2(4):269–277. doi: 10.4161/chan.2.4.6402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Altier C, et al. ORL1 receptor-mediated internalization of N-type calcium channels. Nat Neurosci. 2006;9(1):31–40. doi: 10.1038/nn1605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Green EM, et al. The tumor suppressor eIF3e mediates calcium-dependent internalization of the L-type calcium channel CaV1.2. Neuron. 2007;55(4):615–632. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.07.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Gomez-Ospina N, et al. The C terminus of the L-type voltage-gated calcium channel Ca(V)1.2 encodes a transcription factor. Cell. 2006;127(3):591–606. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.10.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Varela D, Zamponi GW. Use ‘em and lose’ em-activity-induced removal of calcium channels from the plasma membrane. Neuron. 2007;55(4):539–541. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.07.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Di Biase V, et al. Stable membrane expression of postsynaptic CaV1.2 calcium channel clusters is independent of interactions with AKAP79/150 and PDZ proteins. J Neurosci. 2008;28(51):13845–13855. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3213-08.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Tsuruta F, et al. PIKfyve regulates CaV1.2 degradation and prevents excitotoxic cell death. J Cell Biol. 2009;187(2):279–294. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200903028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Rougier JS, et al. Neuronal precursor cell-expressed developmentally down-regulated 4–1 (NEDD4–1) controls the sorting of newly synthesized Ca(V)1.2 calcium channels. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(11):8829–8838. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.166520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Staub O, et al. Regulation of the epithelial Na+ channel by Nedd4 and ubiquitination. Kidney Int. 2000;57(3):809–815. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00919.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Albesa M, et al. Nedd4–2-dependent ubiquitylation and regulation of the cardiac potassium channel hERG1. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2011;51(1):90–98. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2011.03.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Pirozzi G, et al. Identification of novel human WW domain-containing proteins by cloning of ligand targets. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(23):14611–14616. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.23.14611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Subramanyam P, et al. Activity and calcium regulate nuclear targeting of the calcium channel beta4b subunit in nerve and muscle cells. Channels (Austin) 2009;3(5):343–355. doi: 10.4161/chan.3.5.9696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Altier C, et al. Trafficking of L-type calcium channels mediated by the postsynaptic scaffolding protein AKAP79. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(37):33598–33603. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M202476200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Beguin P, et al. Regulation of Ca2+ channel expression at the cell surface by the small G-protein kir/Gem. Nature. 2001;411(6838):701–706. doi: 10.1038/35079621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Flynn R, Zamponi GW. Regulation of calcium channels by RGK proteins. Channels (Austin) 2010;4(6):434–439. doi: 10.4161/chan.4.6.12865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences: CMLS are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES