Abstract
Pancreatic cancer (PC), as one of the main endocrine and digestive systems malignancies has the highest cancer related mortality in the world. Lack of the evident clinical symptoms and appropriate diagnostic markers in the early stages of tumor progression are the main reasons of the high mortality rate among PC patients. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the molecular pathways involved in the PC progression, in order to introduce novel early diagnostic methods. Epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a critical cellular process associated with pancreatic tumor cells invasion and distant metastasis. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are also important regulators of EMT process. In the present review, we discussed the role of miRNAs in regulation of EMT process during PC progression. It has been reported that the miRNAs mainly regulate the EMT process in pancreatic tumor cells through the regulation of EMT-specific transcription factors and several signaling pathways such as WNT, NOTCH, TGF-β, JAK/STAT, and PI3K/AKT. Considering the high stability of miRNAs in body fluids and their role in regulation of EMT process, they can be introduced as the non-invasive diagnostic markers in the early stages of malignant pancreatic tumors. This review paves the way to introduce a non-invasive EMT based panel marker for the early tumor detection among PC patients.
Keywords: MicroRNA, Epithelial-mesenchymal transition, Pancreatic cancer, Diagnosis, Metastasis
Highlights
-
•
Epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a critical cellular process associated with pancreatic tumor cells invasion.
-
•
In the present review, we discussed the role of miRNAs in regulation of EMT process during PANC progression.
-
•
This review paves the way to introduce a non-invasive EMT based panel marker for the early tumor detection among PANC patients.
1. Introduction
Pancreatic cancer (PC) ranks as the 4th leading cause of cancer related mortality in the Unites States [1], and its prevalence is expected to rise to the second rank by 2030 [2]. It has a high risk of invasion and metastasis in which around 80 % of patients have tumor metastasis at the time of diagnosis [[3], [4], [5]]. About 95 % of PC tumors are adenocarcinoma that originate from the exocrine pancreas [6]. Despite significant advancements in therapeutic modalities, there is still a low 5-year survival rate (15 %) among PC patients [7,8]. Surgery is the primary treatment approach for pancreatic cancer. However, it is only appropriate for 10–15 % of patients, while 80–85 % of PC patients have metastatic or unresectable tumors [9]. It has been reported that the patients with successful treatment have a five-year survival rate of about 20 % [10]. Because of the lack of evident clinical symptoms and efficient diagnostic markers, the majority of PC patients are diagnosed in advanced tumor stages with poor prognosis [11,12]. Therefore, investigation of the molecular mechanisms involved in PC progression is required to introduce novel markers for the early diagnosis, targeted therapy, and determination of drug response in these patients. The poor prognosis in PC patients is related to the invasion and migration of pancreatic tumor cells [13,14].
Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a process in which the epithelial cells lose their polarity to gain a mesenchymal phenotype [15,16]. EMT is described by the CDH1 down regulation, while CDH2 and Vimentin up regulations [17]. It is orchestrated by a number of transcription factors, such as Twist1, ZEB1, and Snail1, which are also CDH1 transcriptional suppressors. EMT is a critical process in embryogenesis, cell differentiation, tissue regeneration, fibrosis, tumor progression, and chemo-resistance [18,19]. PC cells can spread to distant organs through EMT during the early stages of tumor progression [20]. EMT is a critical phase in the development of PC and is closely associated with drug resistance [21]. Targeting the EMT in PC is also a potential therapeutic method [22].
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are the pivotal regulators of cell proliferation, migration, metastasis, and apoptosis. They regulate gene expression by mRNA destruction or translational inhibition [23,24]. Deregulation of miRNAs has been reported during tumorigenesis through activating or silencing oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes, respectively [[25], [26], [27]]. Deregulation of miRNA expression profile was reported in PC patients that can be related with the drug resistance, tumor stage, or patient survival. Therefore, targeted therapy for these specific miRNAs, can afford an efficient and appropriate approach for the potential treatment of the PC patients [28]. Additionally, delivery of the synthetic oligonucleotides via nanoparticles or taking profit from natural remedies can regulate miRNA expression, hence hampering PC growth. MiRNA targeting in conjunction with the conventional tumor therapies may be a novel therapeutic method to increase drug response among PC patients [28]. MiRNAs can promote or repress EMT and tumor metastasis [[29], [30], [31]]. To facilitate the establishment of efficient therapeutic approaches for the metastatic PC, it is imperative to clarify the molecular mechanisms of EMT regulation by miRNAs. Therefore, in the present review we discussed the role of miRNAs in regulation of EMT process in pancreatic tumor cells (Table .1). Regarding the importance of signaling pathways and EMT related transcription factors as the main upstream regulators of EMT process during PC progression, we discussed the role of miRNAs in EMT process by regulation of signaling pathways, EMT related transcription factors, and EMT related structural proteins.
Table 1.
Role of miRNAs in EMT regulation in pancreatic tumor cells.
| STUDY | YEAR | GENE | TARGET | SAMPLES | FUNCTION | APPLICATION |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| an [32] | 2020 | miR-203a-3p | SLUG | PANC-1, AsPC-1, Capan-1 and SW 1990 cell lines | Inhibited EMT process | Diagnosis |
| liang [33] | 2022 | miR-30e-5p | SNAI1 | 30 patients HCCLM3, MHCC97L, MHCC97H, and Huh7 cell lines |
Inhibited EMT process | Diagnosis and Prognosis |
| zhang [34] | 2018 | miR-204 | ZEB1 | 63 patients Capan-2, ASPC-1, SW-1990, and Panc-1 cell lines |
Inhibited EMT process | Diagnosis |
| zheng [35] | 2022 | miR-128- 3p | ZEB1 | AsPC-1, BxPC-3, CFPAC-1, and PANC-1 cell lines | Inhibited EMT process | Diagnosis |
| liu [36] | 2016 | miR-1271 | ZEB1 TWIST1 | 58 patients SW1990, Bxpc-3, PANC-1 and ASPC-1 cell lines |
Inhibited EMT process | Diagnosis and Prognosis |
| fu [37] | 2021 | miR-506-3p | ZEB2 | SW1990 and PANC-1 cell lines | Inhibited EMT process | Diagnosis |
| gao [38] | 2017 | miR-145 | MMP3 | BxPC-3, AsPC-1 and PANC-1 cell lines | Inhibited EMT process | Diagnosis |
| zhang [39] | 2021 | miR-1251 | SOX4 | 50 patients AsPC-1, PANC-1, SW-1990 and PaCa-2 cell lines |
Induced EMT process | Diagnosis and Prognosis |
| lu [40] | 2017 | miR-142 | HIF-1α | 42 patients PANC-1, SW1990, Hup, and CFPAC-1 cell lines |
Inhibited EMT process | Diagnosis |
| xue [41] | 2020 | miR-539 | SP1 | 56 patients CAPAN-2, BxPC3, CFPAC1, SW1990 and PANC1 cell lines |
Inhibited EMT process | Diagnosis |
| zhao [42] | 2021 | miR-9 | c-MYC | 53 patients Canpan-2 cell line |
Inhibited EMT process | Diagnosis and Prognosis |
| mody [43] | 2017 | miR-202 | TGFBR1 TGFBR2 | PAN 02 cell line | Inhibited EMT process | Diagnosis |
| zhou [44] | 2018 | miR-665 | TGFBR1TGFBR2 | 35 patients SW1990, BxPC-3, PANC-1, AsPC-1, and CFPAC-1 cell lines |
Inhibited EMT process | Diagnosis |
| hiramoto [45] | 2017 | miR-509-5p miR-1243 | Snail ZEB1 | 50 patients Panc1 and KMP3 cell lines |
Inhibited EMT process | Diagnosis and Prognosis |
| zhang [46] | 2015 | miR-15b | SMURF2 | 19 patients HPAC, BxPC-3, Colo357, L3.6 pl, ASPC-1, Panc-1 and MiaPaCa-2 cell lines |
Induced EMT process | Diagnosis |
| ma [47] | 2019 | miR-141 | NRP-1 | 57 patients BxPC-3, AsPC-1, PANC-1, MIA-PaCa-2, Capan-1 and SUIT-2 cell lines |
Inhibited EMT process | Diagnosis |
| zhang [48] | 2022 | miR-1301-3p | RhoA | 72 patients SW1990, AsPC-1, CFPAC-1, PANC-1, Patu-8988, and HPDE6-C7 cell lines |
Inhibited EMT process | Diagnosis and Prognosis |
| kang [49] | 2020 | miR-181a | RKIP | 56 patients PANC-1 cell line |
Induced EMT process | Diagnosis |
| hu [50] | 2018 | miR-361-3p | DUSP2 | 65 patients BxPC-3, PANC-1, CFPAC-1 and SW1990 cell lines |
Induced EMT process | Diagnosis and Prognosis |
| sun [51] | 2015 | miR-29a | TTP | 30 patients Panc-1 and BXPC3 cell lines |
Induced EMT process | Diagnosis |
| wu [52] | 2020 | miR-429 | FOXD1 | 110 patients PANC-1, BxPC-3, AsPC-1 and CFPAC-1 cell lines |
Inhibited EMT process | Diagnosis and Prognosis |
| sun [53] | 2021 | miR-338-5p | EGFR | 84 patients AsPC-1, BxPC-3, PANC-1, MIA PaCa-2, Capan-2 and SW1990 cell lines |
Inhibited EMT process | Diagnosis and Prognosis |
| wan [54] | 2020 | miR-382 | Anxa3 | 115 patients CFPAC-1, BxPC-3, PANC-1, and SW1990 cell lines |
Inhibited EMT process | Diagnosis |
| xu [55] | 2020 | miR-141 | TM4SF1 | 90 patients SW1990, PANC-1, BxPC-3, and CFPAC-1 cell lines |
Inhibited EMT process | Diagnosis and Prognosis |
| shen [56] | 2021 | miR-671 | S100P | 40 patients AsPC-1, BxPC-3, SW-1990 and PaCa-2 cell lines |
Inhibited EMT process | Diagnosis and Prognosis |
| zhao [57] | 2021 | miR-374b-5p | KDM5B | 78 patients PANC-1, AsPC-1, MIA PaCa-2, and SW1990 cell lines |
Inhibited EMT process | Diagnosis and Prognosis |
| tang [58] | 2017 | miR-34a | Snail1 Notch1 |
PANC-1 and SW-1990 cell lines | Inhibited EMT process | Diagnosis |
| kong [59] | 2020 | miR-1224-5p | ELF3 | 20 patients AsPC-1, Capan-2, PANC-1, and SW1990 cell lines |
Induced EMT process | Diagnosis and Prognosis |
| peng [60] | 2017 | miR-148a | Wnt10b | 33 patients BxPC-3, AsPC-1 and Mia PaCa-2 cell lines |
Inhibited EMT process | Diagnosis and Prognosis |
| chen [61] | 2018 | miR-331-3p | ST7L | 17 patients PANC-1, MIAPaCa-2, AsPC-1, BxPC-3, and SW1990 cell lines |
Induced EMT process | Diagnosis |
| zhan [62] | 2020 | miR-455-3p | TAZ | PANC-1 and MIAPaCa-2 cell lines | Inhibited EMT process | Diagnosis |
| zhang [63] | 2020 | miR-382-3p | STAT1 PD-L1 |
90 patients CEPAC, AsPC-1, PANC-1, BxPC-3, Capan-2, and MIAPaCa-2 cell lines |
Inhibited EMT process | Diagnosis and Prognosis |
| wang [64] | 2020 | miR-675-3p | SOCS5 | CAPAN-1 and PANC-1 cell lines | Inhibited EMT process | Diagnosis |
| liu [65] | 2018 | miR-221 | SOCS3 | 60 patients PANC-1, AsPC-1, Capan-2, SW1990, and BXPC-3 cell lines |
Inhibited EMT process | Diagnosis and Prognosis |
| zhao [66] | 2017 | miR-382 | EZH2 | 34 patients PANC-1, AsPC-1, PATU 8988, BxPC-3 and SW 1990 cell lines |
Inhibited EMT process | Diagnosis and Prognosis |
| guo [67] | 2014 | miR-15a | Bmi-1 | 188 patients PANC-1 cell line |
Inhibited EMT process | Diagnosis |
| yang [68] | 2018 | miR-494 | SDC1 | 42 patients ASPC-1, SW1990, BXPC-3, CFPAC-1 and PANC-1 cell lines |
Inhibited EMT process | Diagnosis |
| ma [69] | 2021 | miR-20a-3p | COL11A1 | 170 patients BXPC-3, CFPAC-1, MIA PACA-2, PANC-1, and SW1990 cell lines |
Inhibited EMT process | Diagnosis and Prognosis |
| wu [70] | 2017 | miR-23a | ESRP1 | 52 patients Aspc-1, Bxpc-3, Cfpac-1, and Panc-1 cell lines |
Induced EMT process | Diagnosis and Prognosis |
| yu [71] | 2021 | miR-1206 | ESRP1 | 40 patients AsPC-1, BxPC-3, SW-1990, and PaCa-2 cel lines |
Inhibited EMT process | Diagnosis and Prognosis |
| zhong [72] | 2022 | miR-561-5p | LDHA | 48 patients SW1990, AsPC-1, PANC-1, BxPC-3, Capan-2, and MIAPaCa-2 cell lines |
Inhibited EMT process | Diagnosis and Prognosis |
| su [73] | 2013 | miR-221 | TRPS1 | AsPC-1 cell line | Induced EMT process | Diagnosis |
| dai [74] | 2020 | miR-122-5p | CCNG1 | 60 patients PANC-1 and PL-45 cell lines |
Inhibited EMT process | Diagnosis |
2. EMT related transcription factors
EMT process is orchestrated via a series of EMT related transcription factors (EMT-TFs) [75]. MiRNAs have a pivotal role in regulation of EMT process by EMT-TFs targeting in pancreatic tumor cells (Fig. 1). SLUG is an important transcription factor that promotes metastasis and invasion during tumor progression through initiating EMT by CDH1 down regulation [76]. Snail1 is also a zinc-finger transcription factor that promotes EMT process by up regulation of mesenchymal genes like CDH2 while down regulation of epithelial genes like CDH1 and Occludin [77,78]. MiR-203a-3p inhibited the EMT process by suppressing cell invasion via SLUG targeting [32]. MiR-30e-5p had a tumor suppressor function in regulation of PC cell proliferation, EMT, and migration through SNAI1 suppression. There was also miR-30e-5p down regulation in PC tissues in comparison with normal samples [33]. MiR-199 inhibited self-renewal of gemcitabine (GEM)-treated PC cells. It also repressed the GEM's inhibitory effect on EMT in PC cells by Snail1 targeting [79].
Fig. 1.
Role of miRNAs in EMT regulation via EMT-related transcription factors in pancreatic tumor cells. (Created with BioRender.com).
Zinc finger E-box binding (ZEB) family is involved in the EMT process through inhibiting the expression level of epithelial marker E-cadherin in various human cancers, indicating the role of ZEB in metastasis and cancer patients prognosis [80]. The miR-204 expression has been reported to be significantly down regulated in PC tissues that was correlated with invasive tumor characteristics. MiR-204 significantly suppressed PC cell migration and EMT via ZEB1 targeting [34]. ADPGK-AS1 promoted the PC cell migration and EMT, while inhibited apoptosis by miR-205-5p sponging and ZEB1 up regulation [81]. MiR-128-3p also suppressed the EMT and cell migration in PC through ZEB1 targeting [35]. There was miR-1271 down-regulation in PC cells and clinical samples. MiR-1271 enhanced CDH1 expression and inhibited PC cell growth, invasion, and EMT by TWIST1 and ZEB1 targeting [36]. There were significant higher invasion and migration abilities in Gemcitabine-resistant (GR) cells that were associated with CDH1 down regulation, while increased levels of CDH2, Vimentin, Snail1, and ZEB1-2 expressions. NEAT1 down regulation increased the gemcitabine sensitivity via regulating the miR-506-3p/ZEB2 axis and reversing the EMT process in GR cells [37]. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are a small fraction of cancerous cells that potentially have self-renewal traits and have a critical role in cell division, drug resistance, and tumor relapse [82]. CSC-like characteristics can be provided by virtue EMT process in cancer cells, and CSCs utilize an EMT phenotype for metastasis [83]. Oct4 and Nanog are critical transcription factors that regulate self-renewal in the early stages of PC progression [84]. There was Linc-DYNC2H1-4 up regulation in GEM-resistant PC cells. Linc-DYNC2H1-4 increased the EMT in GEM-sensitive PC cells through miR-145 sponging that resulted in ZEB1, Sox2, Lin28, Nanog, MMP3, and Oct4 up regulations [38]. MiR-200a suppressed EMT and cell migration through down-regulating ZEB1 in PC cells [85].
SOX4 is a transcription factor involved in EMT regulation in several malignancies [86,87]. SOX4 expression is significantly correlated with tumor growth, EMT, and metastasis [88]. EZH2 is a catalytic component of the polycomb complex which is involved in transcriptional inhibition through catalyzing the trimethylation of histone3 lysine27 [89]. SOX4 acts as a direct transcriptional activator of the EZH2 gene in cancer cells [90]. There was circ_0001666 up regulation in PC tissues that was associated with a worse prognosis. Circ_0001666 enhanced PC invasion and EMT through miR-1251/SOX4 axis [39].
Hypoxia is a typical characteristic of middle- and late-stage solid tumors, promoting tumor angiogenesis, migration ability, and drug resistance [91,92]. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) is considered as an important transcription factor that modulates the oxygen homeostasis during hypoxia [93,94]. MiR-142 down regulated HIF-1α, vimentin, and VEGF-C, while up regulated CDH1 that resulted in hypoxia-mediated EMT suppression. HIF-1α and miR-142 expression levels were also shown to be correlated with the stage and lymph node involvement in PC patients [40].
Specificity protein 1 (Sp1) belongs to the Sp1/Krüppel-like protein family that is associated with tumor metastasis [95,96]. There was miR-539 under expression in PC tissues in comparison with normal samples. MiR-539 up regulated the CDH1, while down regulated CDH2 and Snail1. MiR-539 reduced PC cell migration and EMT through SP1 targeting [41]. The c-Myc as a master regulator is responsible for cellular growth and apoptosis [97]. The up regulation of c-Myc leads to the beginning and preservation of a wide range of signal-transduction pathways which induce EMT, invasion, and metastasis in numerous human cancers [98]. The c-MYC oncogene, which is a crucial regulator of EMT and metastasis, plays an important role in the development of several malignancies through stimulating miR-9 expression [99,100]. EIF4A1 is the main isoform of eIF4A, involved in eIF4F assembly in cancer cells. It was observed that eIF4A1 reduced the levels of CDH1 expressions via the c-MYC/miR-9 axis that stimulated EMT and invasion in PC cells [42].
3. TGF-β and MAPK signaling pathways
TGFβ-1 is a critical multifunctional cytokine that regulates the EMT process in tumor microenvironment [101,102]. TGF-β stimulates serine-threonine kinase receptors, which mainly function through canonical Smad-dependent signaling cascades and have often paracrine effects on the pancreatic tumor microenvironment [103,104]. TGF-β signaling pathway is triggered by TGF-β/TGFBR2 interaction that phosphorylates the Smad2 and Smad3 [105]. R-Smads further interact with Smad4 to enter to the nucleus where they up regulate the Snail1, ZEB2, and Twist transcription factors. TGF-β also regulates the EMT process by interaction with PI3K/AKT, MAPK, and WNT signaling pathways [106]. MiRNAs have an important role in EMT regulation by the TGF-β signaling (Fig. 2). TGF-β induces EMT by Snail1 up regulation [107,108]. Snail1 enables PC cells to undergo EMT through CDH2 overexpression and CDH1 under expression [20,109]. MiR-202 reduced TGFβ1-mediated EMT in PC cells via TGFBR1 and TGFBR2 targeting [43]. There was linc00462 up regulation in PC cells and tissues that was associated with tumor size, differentiation, distant metastasis, and TNM stage. Linc00462 promoted cell migration while suppressed cell adhesion and apoptosis through EMT induction. MiR-665 suppressed cell migration and enhanced apoptosis through targeting TGFBR1 and TGFBR2 in PC cells. Linc00462 enhanced PANC progression via regulating the miR-665/TGFBR1-2/SMAD2-3 axis [44]. MiR-509-5p was shown to regulate HMGA2 and VIM, which resulted in induction of the mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET). MiR-1243 also induced MET by regulating SMAD2 and SMAD4, which mediate the TGF-β signaling. MiR-655 induced the MET process via CDH1 up regulation. MiR-509-5p and miR-1243 promoted the MET phenotype by Snail1 and ZEB1 targeting [45].
Fig. 2.
Role of miRNAs in EMT regulation via TGFβ signaling pathway in pancreatic tumor cells. (Created with BioRender.com).
SMURF2 is an E3 ubiquitin ligase involved in TGF-β signaling pathway, cell mobility, and chromatin remodeling [110]. It attenuates the TGF-β cascade through ubiquitin-dependent degradation of Smad2/7 proteins and TGF-β receptors [111]. There was a negative association between the levels of SMURF2 expressions and GEM resistance in PC. MiR-15b enhanced EMT in PC cells via SMURF2 targeting [46]. Neuropilin-1 (NRP-1) acts as a co-receptor for TGF-β [112]. It was observed that NRP-1 depletion suppressed TGF-β that resulted in Snail1, p-Smad2/3, and CDH2 down regulations, while CDH1 up regulation. MiR-141 reduced EMT process by NRP-1 targeting in PC cells [47]. RhoA belongs to the GTPase protein family that can stimulate actin cytoskeleton rearrangement to control cell adhesion and motility [113,114]. It regulates gene expression, cell growth, and cell cycle development via downstream effector proteins such as ROCK1 and ROCK2 [115]. Smad signaling regulated RhoA activity and function, especially in EMT and TGF-β-induced actin organization. Consequently, the Smad and RhoA pathways have been shown that mediate TGF-β activity [116]. There was miR-1301-3p down regulation in PC tissues that was correlated with poor survival. MiR-1301-3p suppressed PANC cell migration and RhoA-mediated EMT process [48].
MEK/ERK pathway has a pivotal role in cell proliferation, survival, differentiation, and self-renewal of stem cells through STAT3 inhibition [117]. MiRNAs have a key role in EMT regulation through the modulation of MAPK signaling in pancreatic tumor cells (Fig. 2). Raf-1 kinase inhibitor protein (RKIP) acts as a metastasis suppressor in human malignancies [118]. The Raf/MEK/ERK axis is frequently deregulated in malignancies due to mutation and amplification of receptor tyrosine kinases and Ras as the upstream regulators of Raf-1 [119,120]. It was shown that miR-18a induced EMT and CSC phenotypes in PC cells via RKIP down regulation [49]. TGF-β-mediated EMT can be affected by ERK signaling [121]. TGFβ-1 -induced Snail1, which is known for its role in EMT via binding to the CDH1 promoter, also requires the ERK pathway activation [122,123]. Ago2 participates in endogenous miRNA synthesis and RNA interference [124]. MiR-361-3p activated the ERK pathway by DUSP2 targeting. There were miR-361-3p up regulations in PC tissues that were associated with poor survival and advanced tumor stage. MiR-361-3p modulated ERK1/2-induced EMT in PC by DUSP2 targeting. Ago2 also up regulated the miR-361-3p that subsequently promoted EMT in PC cells through DUSP2 targeting [50]. Tristetraprolin (TTP) promotes deadenylation and degradation of target mRNAs [125]. ERK and p38 signaling pathways regulate TTP activity and phosphorylation in which ERK decreases TTP levels through protein degradation [126,127]. MiR-29a increased PC invasion and EMT via TTP targeting [51]. There was OIP5-AS1 up regulation in TCGA-PAAD samples that was correlated with survival. OIP5-AS1 increased the PC malignancy by modulating the miR-429/FOXD1/ERK axis [52]. EGFR has a critical impact on EMT program in a variety of malignancies [128,129]. The increased tyrosine kinase activity of the EGFR receptors resulting from EGFR dimerization with other members of the EGFR family can activate p38 MAPK and PI3K signaling pathways [130,131]. It has been demonstrated that TIP30 targeting by miR-10b promoted EGF-dependent invasion, EGFR phosphorylation, and activation of ERK1/2 in PC, while reduced EGFR degradation [132]. There was miR-338-5p down regulation in PC tissues in comparison with normal specimens that was contributed with higher AJCC stage and lymph node involvement. MiR-338-5p reduced PC cell invasion and EMT process by EGFR targeting [53].
4. PI3K/AKT and Notch signaling pathways
PI3K/Akt signaling pathway is an important regulator of EMT process and tumor cell invasion [133,134]. The activation of PI3K/Akt pathway via a series of EMT-TFs promotes EMT by a positive feedback loop between Akt and Twist and up regulating Snail1 and Slug after GSK-3β degradation [133,135]. Moreover, the up regulation of MMPs leads to the PI3K/Akt activation, E-cadherin down regulation, and extracellular matrix (ECM) degradation, resulting in EMT process, cell migration, and invasion [[136], [137], [138]]. It has been shown that the miRNAs have a pivotal role in regulation of EMT process by PI3K/AKT targeting in pancreatic tumor cells (Fig. 3). Annexin A3 (Anxa3) belongs to the Annexin protein family which binds to the phospholipids during PC progression [139,140]. It was reported that miR-382 up regulated the CDH1, while down regulated PI3K, AKT, Vimentin, and CDH2. Therefore, miR-382 inhibited EMT and lymph node involvement by suppressing the PI3K/Akt pathway via Anxa3 targeting in PC [54]. Transmembrane-4-L-six-family (TM4SF1) as a cell surface protein plays a critical function in cell proliferation, motility, and EMT [141]. There was an inverse association between the levels of TM4SF1 and miR-141 expressions that was correlated with advanced stage and poor survival. MiR-141 directly targets and blocks the expression of TM4SF1, reducing angiogenesis and EMT in PC cells. TM4SF1 positively and negatively regulated the VEGF-A and CDH1 expressions, respectively in PC cells using the promotion of AKT signaling [55]. S100A4 as an EF-hand Ca2+-binding protein interacts with numerous target proteins to regulate some cellular processes, including proliferation, motility, differentiation, cell cycle regulation, protein phosphorylation, and survival [142]. Calcium-binding protein S100P expression has been shown to enhance tumor development and metastasis in several malignancies [143,144]. S100P is able to induce EMT and invasion in colon cancer cells through AKT activation and S100A4 up regulation [145]. Circ_0092314 promoted the EMT features of PC cells by miR-671/S100P axis. There was circ_0092314 up regulation in PC tissues that was associated with PC aggressiveness [56]. KDM5B is a histone demethylase that is involved in regulation of stem cell differentiation, gene transcription, and genome stability via demethylation of histone 3 lysine 4 [146,147]. KDM5B promotes PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling via histone modification level of KDM5B and binding to the PIK3CA promoter [148,149]. KDM5B overexpression has been observed in many cancers [[150], [151], [152]]. There was miR-374b-5p down regulation in PC tissues. MiR-374b-5p reduced tumor progression and lung metastasis through suppressing PC cell proliferation and migration by KDM5B targeting and subsequent EMT inhibition [57].
Fig. 3.
Role of miRNAs in EMT regulation via PI3K/AKT signaling pathway in pancreatic tumor cells. (Created with BioRender.com).
Notch signaling is a pivotal regulator of cell cycle progression and apoptosis that is triggered by binding of Jag or DLL ligands with NOTCH receptors [153,154]. Binding of ligand to its receptor leads to proteolytic cleavages of Notch receptor via metalloproteinase and gamma-secretase, which release and translocate intracellular domain of Notch (Notch-ICD) to the nucleus [155,156]. ICD interacts with CBF1/Su(H)/Lag-1 (CSL) and induces the transcription of several NOTCH target genes such as SLUG, SNAIL1, ZEB1, HEY, HES, and CCND1, while down regulation of CDH1 to promote EMT [155,157,158]. NOTCH signaling can also be activated by the EMT related transcription factors [159,160]. MiR-34a down regulation was correlated with higher PC cell invasion and migration. MiR-34a inhibited the EMT process in PC cells by Notch1 and Snail1 targeting that resulted in CDH1 up regulation [58]. ELF3 belongs to the ETS transcription factor family that promotes or represses tumor progression. ELF3 induced tumor growth in HER2+ breast cancer, liver cancer, and lung cancer [[161], [162], [163]]. However, ELF3 silencing promoted the EMT in ovarian cancer [164]. There was miR-1224-5p down regulation in PC tissues. MiR-1224-5p decreased PC cell invasion by ELF3 targeting. P-PI3K and P-Akt expression levels were found to be significantly reduced when ELF3 was knocked down, suggesting that ELF3 may induce EMT via activating the PI3K/AKT pathways. ELF3 silencing also down regulated the Notch signaling related genes such as Notch-1, C-myc, CCND1, Hes1, and VEGF in pancreatic tumor cells [59].
5. WNT signaling pathway
WNT signaling is a developmental molecular pathway associated with cell differentiation, proliferation, apoptosis, and ontogenesis [165,166]. It can be triggered with WNT stimulation and increased cytoplasmic β-catenin accumulation that enters into the nucleus which induces target genes [167,168]. MiRNAs have a key role in EMT process via the regulation of WNT signaling in pancreatic tumor cells (Fig. 4). Wnt10b belongs to the Wnt ligand protein family that activates the WNT signaling [169,170]. MiR-148a suppressed the EMT process in PC cells via Wnt10b targeting. There was significant miR-148a under expression in PC tissues that was contributed with advanced tumor stage and lymphatic metastasis. There was also CDH1 down regulation while vimentin up regulation in PC tissues. MiR-148a significantly reduced the levels of β-catenin, CCND1, and MMP-9 expressions in pancreatic tumor cells [60]. Wnt1 stimulates the Wnt/β-catenin pathway that influences cell proliferation, EMT, and self-renewal [171]. MiR-148a-3p inhibited cell invasion, self-renewal, and EMT in PANC via Wnt1 targeting. MiR-148a-3p up regulated CDH1 while down regulated the CDH2 and vimentin in PC cells. MiR-148a-3p was considerably down regulated in pancreatic CSCs, while CSC markers were up regulated. There was significant miR-148a-3p down regulation in PC patients that was correlated with poor OS [172]. ST7L functions as a tumor suppressor by interaction with the β-catenin pathway [173,174]. It reduces the expression level of β-catenin and GSK-3β phosphorylation, leading to inhibition of β-catenin transcription. Consequently, knockdown of ST7L promotes growth, invasion, and EMT of tumor cells [175]. There was miR-331-3p up regulations in PC cells and clinical specimens, which was associated with the advanced stage and distant invasion. MiR-331-3p inhibited ST7L and then enhanced proliferation and EMT-mediated metastasis in PC cells [61]. Transcriptional co-activator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ) is up regulated in many cancers [176]. TAZ was found to be induced by the interaction of β-catenin with TBX5, while inhibited by polymerase activity inhibitors via the WNT pathway [177]. It was found that miR-455-3p inhibited TAZ expression with subsequent WNT/β-catenin signaling inactivation, resulting in apoptosis induction, while cell migration and EMT inhibition in PC. MiR-455-3p enhanced cell death through influencing the Bcl-2, CASP3, and Bax apoptotic proteins. MiR-455-3p inhibited CCND1, β-catenin, and C-myc by TAZ targeting in PC cells [62].
Fig. 4.
Role of miRNAs in EMT regulation via WNT and JAK/STAT signaling pathways in pancreatic tumor cells. (Created with BioRender.com).
6. JAK/STAT signaling pathway
JAK/STAT signaling pathway is activated via the binding of a ligand (such as interleukins and interferons) to its receptor that leads to phosphorylation of cytoplasmic STAT. The activated STATs translocate to the nucleus, bind to DNA, and induce target gene transcription [167,178]. JAK/STAT pathway is involved in tumor metastasis, EMT, and drug resistance [167,179]. MiRNAs are the critical EMT regulators by affecting the JAK/STAT signaling in pancreatic tumor cells (Fig. 4). STAT1 is a transcription factor involved in tumor immune function that regulates tumorigenesis, and tumor progression through the NF-KB signaling pathway [180,181]. PSMB8-AS1 down-regulation was shown to considerably suppress PC progression and metastasis by regulation of miR-382-3p/STAT1/PD-L1 axis [63]. H19 as an imprinted long noncoding RNA plays a role in cell division, apoptosis, migration, and tumor invasion [182,183]. SOCS3 regulates cytokine signaling through inhibiting receptor-JAK complex [184]. SOCS5 regulates the binding of EGF and IL-4 to the receptor by the JAK/STAT pathway to inhibit cytokine signaling [185]. It has been demonstrated that H19 was correlated with the EMT process, enhanced migration, invasion, and resistance to chemotherapy in PC cells. SOCS5 as an endogenous inhibitor of the STAT3 pathway can be directly targeted by miR-675-3p. H19 induced EMT in PC cells by regulation of miR-675-3p/SOCS5 axis that resulted in STAT3 activation [64]. There were GAS5 and SOCS3 down regulations, while miR-221 up regulation in PC tissues and cell lines. GAS5 promoted SOCS3 expression that resulted in reduced PC growth and gemcitabine resistance through EMT suppression. GAS5 reverses the EMT process in PC cells via miR-221/SOCS3 axis [65].
7. Polycomb repressive complex
Polycomb group proteins (PcG) are the epigenetic regulators involved in transcriptional inhibition through chromatin remodeling. Polycomb complex regulates the EMT related signaling pathways [186]. It has been reported that miRNAs have key roles in EMT process during PC progression by regulation of polycomb complex (Fig. 5). Enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) is one of the components of the polycomb repressive complex-2 (PRC2) that is involved in histone methylation [187]. EZH2 inhibits the expression of tumor suppressor genes in a wide spectrum of cancers using epigenetic modifications and trimethylation of H3K27 that results in regulation of cell proliferation, invasion, migration, and apoptosis [188,189]. EZH2 down regulated the miR-139-5p that induced EMT in PC cells. There was miR-139-5p down regulation in PC tissues that was correlated with advanced TNM stages, distant metastases, and poor prognosis [190]. TUG1 knockdown inhibited migration and EMT processes. TUG1 regulated the PC development by miR-382 sponging and subsequent EZH2 up regulation in PC cells [66]. Bmi-1 is also a critical polycomb protein that regulates the hematopoietic and neural stem cells' self-renewal and proliferation [191]. There was miR-15a down regulation in PC tissues in comparison with normal controls. MiR-15a repressed proliferation and EMT in PC cells through Bmi-1 targeting [67].
Fig. 5.
Role of miRNAs in EMT regulation via polycomb complex in pancreatic tumor cells. (Created with BioRender.com).
8. Structural proteins and cell cycle regulators
It has been reported that the EMT process in PC cells can also be affected by the structural proteins and cell cycle regulators (Fig. 6). Syndecan-1 (SDC1) is a crucial cell surface adhesive molecule that plays an essential role in cell morphology and tumor progression [192]. Deregulation of SDC1 is implicated in the induction of CSCs formation that leads to drug resistance and tumor relapse [193]. MiR-494 suppressed PC cell migration and EMT by SDC1 inhibition [68]. Collagen type XI alpha 1 (COL11A1) is a critical collagen involved in the regulation of EMT. Several collagens, including collagen type I, III, V, VI, and XI are found to be associated with chemo resistance and tumorigenesis [194,195]. There was circ-0005105 up regulation in PC tissues that was associated with poor prognosis. Circ-0005105 promoted PC cell proliferation, EMT, and invasion by COL11A1 up regulation through miR-20a-3p sponging [69].
Fig. 6.
Role of miRNAs in EMT regulation via structural proteins and cell cycle regulators in pancreatic tumor cells. (Created with BioRender.com).
P120-catenin acts as a regulator of cadherin stability, cell motility, cellular transformation, and cancer progression [196]. The p120 catenin regulates the CDH1 membrane trafficking through endocytosis [197]. E-cadherin and p120 catenin are the regulators of colon tumor cell migration [198]. MiR-197 promoted the EMT in PC cells through p120 Catenin targeting [199].
CD44 as a cell surface protein is involved in cell migration, angiogenesis, and cell differentiation. CD44s has been associated with the mesenchymal phenotype in tumor cells [200,201]. There was miR-23a up regulation in PC tissues compared with normal margins that was contributed with tumor invasion, lymph node involvement, and lower survival rates. MiR-23a promoted the epithelial cells for the CD44v to CD44s switch and down regulated the ESRP1 [70]. Epithelial splicing regulatory protein 1 (ESRP1) is an inhibitor of EMT in different cancers [202,203]. ESRP1 as a splicing factor modulates alternative splicing of CD44 to promote EMT and metastasis [204,205]. By modulating the miR-1206/ESRP1 axis, circ-0092367 dramatically increased GEM sensitivity in PC cells. There was circ-0092367 down regulation in PC tissues that was inversely correlated with tumor stage and lymph node involvement. ESRP1 not only decreased EMT and cell invasion but also sensitized PC cells toward GEM treatment [71].
Lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA) enhances tumor progression via elevating lactic acid production, and glucose uptake, as well as modulating several cancer-related chemicals [[206], [207], [208]]. The overexpression of LDHA is positively associated with N-cadherin and negatively with E-cadherin [209]. There was LINC01128 up regulation in PC cells and tissues that enhanced in vivo tumorigenesis and in vitro cell proliferation and EMT through miR-561-5p/LDHA axis. LINC01128 has been linked to a poor prognosis in PC patients [72].
P27Kip1 is a Cip/Kip cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor that binds with RhoA to regulate the cytoskeletal structure and cell motility [210,211]. Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) is a receptor tyrosine kinase that regulates cell migration, EMT, angiogenesis, and proliferation [212]. PDGF down regulated the CDH1, while up regulated the ZEB2 that resulted in EMT induction in epithelial-like tumor cells [213]. TRPS1 as a transcriptional factor from the GATA family can control ZEB2 expression [214]. PDGF-BB treatment increased cell migration and EMT in PC cells. PDGF up regulated the miR-221 by recruitment of transcription factors. MiR-221 increased PC cell proliferation by p27Kip1 down regulation. MiR-221 was also regulated by PDGF that induced the EMT via TRPS1 inhibition [73]. Cyclin G1 (CCNG1) belongs to the cyclin protein family, which regulates cell proliferation [215,216]. CCNG1 was found to be associated with cell proliferation, migration, and invasion by enhancing tumorigenesis and the EMT process [217]. There was miR-122-5p down regulation in PC cells and tissues that was inversely associated with tumor size, stage, and lymph node metastasis. MiR-122-5p reduced PC cell proliferation, invasion, and migration via suppressing CCNG1. MiR-122-5p inhibited EMT by CDH1 up regulation while CDH2, Vimentin, and MMP9 down regulations [74].
9. Conclusions
EMT process is a pivotal cellular mechanism during tumor cell invasion, in which the tumor cells obtain the mesenchymal features to separate from the tumor bulk for the distant implantation and metastasis. Therefore, assessment of the molecular biology of EMT process is required to suggest the novel biomarkers for the prediction of metastatic behavior in pancreatic tumors. Since, the PC cells can spread to distant organs through EMT process during the early stages of tumor progression; the regulators of EMT process can be used as the early stage diagnostic markers among these cancer patients. On the other hand, high mortality rate among the PC patients is associated with lack of screening programs that leads to the late diagnosis with poor prognosis. Therefore, it is required to introduce novel non-invasive biomarkers that can be assessed without any invasion in general population for the screening of PC. MiRNAs as the stable molecules in body fluids can be reliable non-invasive biomarkers. In the present review, we discussed the role of miRNAs in regulation of EMT process in pancreatic cancer. It was observed that miRNAs mainly affect the EMT in pancreatic tumor cells by regulating transcription factors and signaling pathways. Considering the importance of miRNAs in EMT regulation, this review can be an effective step in introducing a non-invasive EMT based panel marker for the early tumor diagnosis among PC patients. However, more studies are needed to investigate miRNA levels in the serum of cancer patients so that they can be used as the non-invasive markers to predict the metastatic behavior of tumors in pancreatic cancer patients. EMT related miRNAs can also be used for the targeted tumor therapy. Since, miRNAs inhibit the EMT process in pancreatic tumor cells; therapeutic strategies based on miRNA mimics can be used to inhibit the EMT process in these tumor cells. However, more animal studies and clinical trials are also needed to use miRNAs as the inhibitors of EMT process and tumor cell invasion in pancreatic cancer patients.
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Data availability statement
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Faezeh Tolue Ghasaban: Writing – original draft. Mahmoud Ghanei: Writing – original draft. Reihaneh Alsadat Mahmoudian: Writing – original draft. Negin Taghehchian: Writing – original draft. Mohammad Reza Abbaszadegan: Validation. Meysam Moghbeli: Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Validation, Supervision, Conceptualization.
Declaration of competing interest
none
Acknowledgements
None.
References
- 1.Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Wagle N.S., Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023;73:17–48. doi: 10.3322/caac.21763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rahib L., Smith B.D., Aizenberg R., Rosenzweig A.B., Fleshman J.M., Matrisian L.M. Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Cancer Res. 2014;74:2913–2921. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Huang C., Xie K. Analysis of the potential for pancreatic cancer metastasis in vitro and in vivo. Methods Mol. Biol. 2013;980:301–319. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-287-2_17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Siegel R., Naishadham D., Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63:11–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jones O.P., Melling J.D., Ghaneh P. Adjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014;20:14733–14746. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i40.14733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bond-Smith G., Banga N., Hammond T.M., Imber C.J. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Bmj. 2012;344 doi: 10.1136/bmj.e2476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hussain S.P. Pancreatic cancer: current progress and future challenges. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2016;12:270. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.14950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Paulson A.S., Cao H.S.T., Tempero M.A., Lowy A.M. Therapeutic advances in pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterology. 2013;144:1316–1326. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.01.078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mizrahi J.D., Surana R., Valle J.W., Shroff R.T. Pancreatic cancer. Lancet. 2020;395:2008–2020. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30974-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kardosh A., Lichtensztajn D.Y., Gubens M.A., Kunz P.L., Fisher G.A., Clarke C.A. Long-term survivors of pancreatic cancer: a California population-based study. Pancreas. 2018;47:958–966. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ryan D.P., Hong T.S., Bardeesy N. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014;371:2140–2141. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1412266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mizrahi J.D., Surana R., Valle J.W., Shroff R.T. Pancreatic cancer. Lancet. 2020;395:2008–2020. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30974-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hartwig W., Büchler M.W. Pancreatic cancer: current options for diagnosis, staging and therapeutic management. Gastrointest. Tumors. 2013;1:41–52. doi: 10.1159/000354992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sclafani F., Iyer R., Cunningham D., Starling N. Management of metastatic pancreatic cancer: current treatment options and potential new therapeutic targets. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2015;95:318–336. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2015.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hamidi A.A., Khalili-Tanha G., Nasrpour Navaei Z., Moghbeli M. Long non-coding RNAs as the critical regulators of epithelial mesenchymal transition in colorectal tumor cells: an overview. Cancer Cell Int. 2022;22:71. doi: 10.1186/s12935-022-02501-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Maharati A., Moghbeli M. PI3K/AKT signaling pathway as a critical regulator of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in colorectal tumor cells. Cell Commun. Signal. 2023;21:201. doi: 10.1186/s12964-023-01225-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pastushenko I., Blanpain C. EMT transition States during tumor progression and metastasis. Trends Cell Biol. 2019;29:212–226. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2018.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kalluri R., Weinberg R.A. The basics of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J. Clin. Invest. 2009;119:1420–1428. doi: 10.1172/JCI39104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Tsai J.H., Yang J. Epithelial–mesenchymal plasticity in carcinoma metastasis. Genes & development. 2013;27:2192–2206. doi: 10.1101/gad.225334.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Rhim A.D., Mirek E.T., Aiello N.M., Maitra A., Bailey J.M., McAllister F., Reichert M., Beatty G.L., Rustgi A.K., Vonderheide R.H. EMT and dissemination precede pancreatic tumor formation. Cell. 2012;148:349–361. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Beuran M., Negoi I., Paun S., Ion A.D., Bleotu C., Negoi R.I., Hostiuc S. The epithelial to mesenchymal transition in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review. Pancreatology. 2015;15:217–225. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2015.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Rodriguez-Aznar E., Wiesmüller L., Sainz B., Jr., Hermann P.C. EMT and stemness-key players in pancreatic cancer stem cells. Cancers. 2019:11. doi: 10.3390/cancers11081136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Moghbeli M. MicroRNAs as the critical regulators of Cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer cells. J. Ovarian Res. 2021;14:127. doi: 10.1186/s13048-021-00882-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zangouei A.S., Alimardani M., Moghbeli M. MicroRNAs as the critical regulators of Doxorubicin resistance in breast tumor cells. Cancer Cell Int. 2021;21:213. doi: 10.1186/s12935-021-01873-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Moghbeli M. Molecular interactions of miR-338 during tumor progression and metastasis. Cellular & molecular biology letters. 2021;26:13. doi: 10.1186/s11658-021-00257-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Moghbeli M., Zangouei A.S., Nasrpour Navaii Z., Taghehchian N. Molecular mechanisms of the microRNA-132 during tumor progressions. Cancer Cell Int. 2021;21:439. doi: 10.1186/s12935-021-02149-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zangouei A.S., Moghbeli M. MicroRNAs as the critical regulators of cisplatin resistance in gastric tumor cells. Gene Environ. : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society. 2021;43:21. doi: 10.1186/s41021-021-00192-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Li Y., Sarkar F.H. MicroRNA targeted therapeutic approach for pancreatic cancer. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2016;12:326–337. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.15017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kumarswamy R., Mudduluru G., Ceppi P., Muppala S., Kozlowski M., Niklinski J., Papotti M., Allgayer H. MicroRNA-30a inhibits epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition by targeting Snai1 and is downregulated in non-small cell lung cancer. Int. J. Cancer. 2012;130:2044–2053. doi: 10.1002/ijc.26218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Vetter G., Saumet A., Moes M., Vallar L., Le Béchec A., Laurini C., Sabbah M., Arar K., Theillet C., Lecellier C.H., Friederich E. miR-661 expression in SNAI1-induced epithelial to mesenchymal transition contributes to breast cancer cell invasion by targeting Nectin-1 and StarD10 messengers. Oncogene. 2010;29:4436–4448. doi: 10.1038/onc.2010.181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 31.Hamidi A.A., Taghehchian N., Basirat Z., Zangouei A.S., Moghbeli M. MicroRNAs as the critical regulators of cell migration and invasion in thyroid cancer. Biomark. Res. 2022;10:40. doi: 10.1186/s40364-022-00382-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.An N., Zheng B. MiR-203a-3p inhibits pancreatic cancer cell proliferation, EMT, and apoptosis by regulating SLUG. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 2020;19 doi: 10.1177/1533033819898729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Liang Z., Tang S., He R., Luo W., Qin S., Jiang H. The effect and mechanism of miR-30e-5p targeting SNAI1 to regulate epithelial-mesenchymal transition on pancreatic cancer. Bioengineered. 2022;13:8013–8028. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2022.2050880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Zhang H., Li M., Xu X. MicroRNA-204 attenuates the migration and invasion of pancreatic cancer cells by targeting ZEB1/EMT axis. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2018;11:3802–3811. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zheng T., Han W., Wang A., Wang Y. Functional mechanism of hsa-miR-128-3p in epithelial-mesenchymal transition of pancreatic cancer cells via ZEB1 regulation. PeerJ. 2022;10 doi: 10.7717/peerj.12802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Liu H., Wang H., Liu X., Yu T. miR-1271 inhibits migration, invasion and epithelial-mesenchymal transition by targeting ZEB1 and TWIST1 in pancreatic cancer cells. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2016;472:346–352. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.02.096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Fu X., Deng X., Xiao W., Huang B., Yi X., Zou Y. Downregulation of NEAT1 sensitizes gemcitabine-resistant pancreatic cancer cells to gemcitabine through modulation of the miR-506-3p/ZEB2/EMT axis. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2021;11:3841. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Gao Y., Zhang Z., Li K., Gong L., Yang Q., Huang X., Hong C., Ding M., Yang H. Linc-DYNC2H1-4 promotes EMT and CSC phenotypes by acting as a sponge of miR-145 in pancreatic cancer cells. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8 doi: 10.1038/cddis.2017.311. e2924-e2924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zhang R., Zhu W., Ma C., Ai K. Silencing of circRNA circ_0001666 represses EMT in pancreatic cancer through upregulating miR-1251 and downregulating SOX4. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2021;8 doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.684866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Lu Y., Ji N., Wei W., Sun W., Gong X., Wang X. MiR-142 modulates human pancreatic cancer proliferation and invasion by targeting hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1α) in the tumor microenvironments. Biology open. 2017;6:252–259. doi: 10.1242/bio.021774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Xue L., Shen Y., Zhai Z., Zheng S. miR-539 suppresses the proliferation, migration, invasion and epithelial mesenchymal transition of pancreatic cancer cells through targeting SP1. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2020;45:1771–1782. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2020.4561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Zhao Y., Wang Y., Chen W., Bai S., Peng W., Zheng M., Yang Y., Cheng B., Luan Z. Targeted intervention of eIF4A1 inhibits EMT and metastasis of pancreatic cancer cells via c-MYC/miR-9 signaling. Cancer Cell Int. 2021;21:1–13. doi: 10.1186/s12935-021-02390-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Mody H.R., Hung S.W., Pathak R.K., Griffin J., Cruz-Monserrate Z., Govindarajan R. miR-202 diminishes TGFβ receptors and attenuates TGFβ1-induced EMT in pancreatic cancer. Mol. Cancer Res. 2017;15:1029–1039. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-16-0327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Zhou B., Guo W., Sun C., Zhang B., Zheng F. Linc00462 promotes pancreatic cancer invasiveness through the miR-665/TGFBR1-TGFBR2/SMAD2/3 pathway. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:1–15. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-0724-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Hiramoto H., Muramatsu T., Ichikawa D., Tanimoto K., Yasukawa S., Otsuji E., Inazawa J. miR-509-5p and miR-1243 increase the sensitivity to gemcitabine by inhibiting epithelial-mesenchymal transition in pancreatic cancer. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:1–12. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04191-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Zhang W.L., Zhang J.H., Wu X.Z., Yan T., Lv W. miR-15b promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition by inhibiting SMURF2 in pancreatic cancer. Int. J. Oncol. 2015;47:1043–1053. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2015.3076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ma L., Zhai B., Zhu H., Li W., Jiang W., Lei L., Zhang S., Qiao H., Jiang X., Sun X. The miR-141/neuropilin-1 axis is associated with the clinicopathology and contributes to the growth and metastasis of pancreatic cancer. Cancer Cell Int. 2019;19:1–15. doi: 10.1186/s12935-019-0963-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Zhang X., Ren Z., Xu J., Chen Q., Ma J., Liu Z., Kou J., Zhao X., Lang R., He Q. MiR-1301-3p inhibits epithelial-mesenchymal transition via targeting RhoA in pancreatic cancer. J Oncol. 2022;2022 doi: 10.1155/2022/5514715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kang H., Ma D., Zhang J., Zhao J., Yang M. MicroRNA-18a induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition like cancer stem cell phenotype via regulating RKIP pathway in pancreatic cancer. Ann. Transl. Med. 2020;8 doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.03.195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Hu J., Li L., Chen H., Zhang G., Liu H., Kong R., Chen H., Wang Y., Li Y., Tian F. MiR-361-3p regulates ERK1/2-induced EMT via DUSP2 mRNA degradation in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:1–15. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-0839-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Sun X.-J., Liu B.-Y., Yan S., Jiang T.-H., Cheng H.-Q., Jiang H.-S., Cao Y., Mao A.-W. MicroRNA-29a promotes pancreatic cancer growth by inhibiting tristetraprolin. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2015;37:707–718. doi: 10.1159/000430389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Wu L., Liu Y., Guo C., Shao Y. LncRNA OIP5-AS1 promotes the malignancy of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma via regulating miR-429/FOXD1/ERK pathway. Cancer Cell Int. 2020;20:1–13. doi: 10.1186/s12935-020-01366-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Sun J., Chen L., Dong M. MiR-338-5p inhibits EGF-induced EMT in pancreatic cancer cells by targeting EGFR/ERK signaling. Frontiers in oncology. 2021:474. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.616481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Wan X., Guo D., Zhu Q., Qu R. microRNA-382 suppresses the progression of pancreatic cancer through the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway by inhibition of Anxa3. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2020;319:G309–G322. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00322.2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Xu D., Yang F., Wu K., Xu X., Zeng K., An Y., Xu F., Xun J., Lv X., Zhang X., Yang X., Xu L. Lost miR-141 and upregulated TM4SF1 expressions associate with poor prognosis of pancreatic cancer: regulation of EMT and angiogenesis by miR-141 and TM4SF1 via AKT. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2020;21:354–363. doi: 10.1080/15384047.2019.1702401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Shen Q., Zheng G., Zhou Y., Tong J., Xu S., Gao H., Zhang X., Fu Q. CircRNA circ_0092314 induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition of pancreatic cancer cells via elevating the expression of S100P by sponging miR-671. Front. Oncol. 2021;11 doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.675442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Zhao X., Zhang X., Zhang X., Jiang T., Zhai J., Wang H., Huang M., Lang R., He Q. MiR-374b-5p inhibits KDM5B-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition in pancreatic cancer. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2021;11:3907. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Tang Y., Tang Y., Cheng Y.S. miR-34a inhibits pancreatic cancer progression through Snail1-mediated epithelial-mesenchymal transition and the Notch signaling pathway. Sci. Rep. 2017;7 doi: 10.1038/srep38232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Kong L., Liu P., Zheng M., Wang Z., Gao Y., Liang K., Wang H., Tan X. The miR-1224-5p/ELF3 Axis regulates malignant behaviors of pancreatic cancer via PI3K/AKT/Notch signaling pathways. OncoTargets Ther. 2020;13:3449–3466. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S248507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Peng L., Liu Z., Xiao J., Tu Y., Wan Z., Xiong H., Li Y., Xiao W. MicroRNA-148a suppresses epithelial-mesenchymal transition and invasion of pancreatic cancer cells by targeting Wnt10b and inhibiting the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Oncol. Rep. 2017;38:301–308. doi: 10.3892/or.2017.5705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Chen X., Luo H., Li X., Tian X., Peng B., Liu S., Zhan T., Wan Y., Chen W., Li Y. miR-331-3p functions as an oncogene by targeting ST7L in pancreatic cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2018;39:1006–1015. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgy074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Zhan T., Zhu Q., Han Z., Tan J., Liu M., Liu W., Chen W., Chen X., Chen X., Deng J. miR-455-3p functions as a tumor suppressor by restraining Wnt/β-catenin signaling via TAZ in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Manag. Res. 2020;12:1483. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S235794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Zhang H., Zhu C., He Z., Chen S., Li L., Sun C. LncRNA PSMB8-AS1 contributes to pancreatic cancer progression via modulating miR-382-3p/STAT1/PD-L1 axis. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2020;39:1–14. doi: 10.1186/s13046-020-01687-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Wang F., Rong L., Zhang Z., Li M., Ma L., Ma Y., Xie X., Tian X., Yang Y. LncRNA H19-derived miR-675-3p promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition and stemness in human pancreatic cancer cells by targeting the STAT3 pathway. J. Cancer. 2020;11:4771–4782. doi: 10.7150/jca.44833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Liu B., Wu S., Ma J., Yan S., Xiao Z., Wan L., Zhang F., Shang M., Mao A. lncRNA GAS5 reverses EMT and tumor stem cell-mediated gemcitabine resistance and metastasis by targeting miR-221/SOCS3 in pancreatic cancer. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids. 2018;13:472–482. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2018.09.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Zhao L., Sun H., Kong H., Chen Z., Chen B., Zhou M. The Lncrna-TUG1/EZH2 axis promotes pancreatic cancer cell proliferation, migration and EMT phenotype formation through sponging Mir-382. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2017;42:2145–2158. doi: 10.1159/000479990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Guo S., Xu X., Tang Y., Zhang C., Li J., Ouyang Y., Ju J., Bie P., Wang H. miR-15a inhibits cell proliferation and epithelial to mesenchymal transition in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma by down-regulating Bmi-1 expression. Cancer letters. 2014;344:40–46. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2013.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Yang Y., Tao X., Li C.B., Wang C.M. MicroRNA-494 acts as a tumor suppressor in pancreatic cancer, inhibiting epithelial-mesenchymal transition, migration and invasion by binding to SDC1. Int. J. Oncol. 2018;53:1204–1214. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2018.4445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Ma G., Li G., Fan W., Xu Y., Song S., Guo K., Liu Z. Circ-0005105 activates COL11A1 by targeting miR-20a-3p to promote pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma progression. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12:1–12. doi: 10.1038/s41419-021-03938-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Wu G., Li Z., Jiang P., Zhang X., Xu Y., Chen K., Li X. MicroRNA-23a promotes pancreatic cancer metastasis by targeting epithelial splicing regulator protein 1. Oncotarget. 2017;8:82854–82871. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.20692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Yu S., Wang M., Zhang H., Guo X., Qin R. Circ_0092367 inhibits EMT and gemcitabine resistance in pancreatic cancer via regulating the miR-1206/ESRP1 Axis. Genes. 2021;12 doi: 10.3390/genes12111701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Zhong M., Fang Z., Ruan B., Xiong J., Li J., Song Z. LINC01128 facilitates the progression of pancreatic cancer through up-regulation of LDHA by targeting miR-561-5p. Cancer Cell Int. 2022;22:1–14. doi: 10.1186/s12935-022-02490-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Su A., He S., Tian B., Hu W., Zhang Z. MicroRNA-221 mediates the effects of PDGF-BB on migration, proliferation, and the epithelial-mesenchymal transition in pancreatic cancer cells. PLoS One. 2013;8 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Dai C., Zhang Y., Xu Z., Jin M. MicroRNA-122-5p inhibits cell proliferation, migration and invasion by targeting CCNG1 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Cell Int. 2020;20:1–18. doi: 10.1186/s12935-020-01185-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Ansieau S., Collin G., Hill L. EMT or EMT-promoting transcription factors, where to focus the light? Frontiers in oncology. 2014;4:353. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2014.00353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Barrallo-Gimeno A., Nieto M.A. 2005. The Snail Genes as Inducers of Cell Movement and Survival: Implications in Development and Cancer. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Grande M.T., Sánchez-Laorden B., López-Blau C., De Frutos C.A., Boutet A., Arévalo M., Rowe R.G., Weiss S.J., López-Novoa J.M., Nieto M.A. Snail1-induced partial epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition drives renal fibrosis in mice and can be targeted to reverse established disease. Nat Med. 2015;21:989–997. doi: 10.1038/nm.3901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Lin Y., Li X.Y., Willis A.L., Liu C., Chen G., Weiss S.J. Snail1-dependent control of embryonic stem cell pluripotency and lineage commitment. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:3070. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Wei W., Wang L., Xu L., Liang J., Teng L. MiR-199 reverses the resistance to gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer by suppressing stemness through regulating the epithelial–mesenchymal transition. ACS Omega. 2021;6:31435–31446. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.1c02945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Wu H.-T., Zhong H.-T., Li G.-W., Shen J.-X., Ye Q.-Q., Zhang M.-L., Liu J. Oncogenic functions of the EMT-related transcription factor ZEB1 in breast cancer. J. Transl. Med. 2020;18:1–10. doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02240-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Song S., Yu W., Lin S., Zhang M., Wang T., Guo S., Wang H. LncRNA ADPGK-AS1 promotes pancreatic cancer progression through activating ZEB1-mediated epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2018;19:573–583. doi: 10.1080/15384047.2018.1423912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Clevers H. The cancer stem cell: premises, promises and challenges. Nat Med. 2011;17:313–319. doi: 10.1038/nm.2304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Karamitopoulou E. Tumor budding cells, cancer stem cells and epithelial-mesenchymal transition-type cells in pancreatic cancer. Front. Oncol. 2012;2:209. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2012.00209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Wen J., Park J.Y., Park K.H., Chung H.W., Bang S., Park S.W., Song S.Y. Oct4 and Nanog expression is associated with early stages of pancreatic carcinogenesis. Pancreas. 2010;39:622–626. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e3181c75f5e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Lu Y., Lu J., Li X., Zhu H., Fan X., Zhu S., Wang Y., Guo Q., Wang L., Huang Y. MiR-200a inhibits epithelial-mesenchymal transition of pancreatic cancer stem cell. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:1–9. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Liu Y., Zeng S., Jiang X., Lai D., Su Z. SOX4 induces tumor invasion by targeting EMT-related pathway in prostate cancer. Tumour Biol. 2017;39 doi: 10.1177/1010428317694539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Zhang J., Xiao C., Feng Z., Gong Y., Sun B., Li Z., Lu Y., Fei X., Wu W., Sun X. SOX4 promotes the growth and metastasis of breast cancer. Cancer Cell Int. 2020;20:1–11. doi: 10.1186/s12935-020-01568-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Hanieh H., Ahmed E.A., Vishnubalaji R., Alajez N.M. Seminars in Cancer Biology. Elsevier; 2020. SOX4: epigenetic regulation and role in tumorigenesis; pp. 91–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Duan R., Du W., Guo W. EZH2: a novel target for cancer treatment. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2020;13:104. doi: 10.1186/s13045-020-00937-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Tiwari N., Tiwari V.K., Waldmeier L., Balwierz P.J., Arnold P., Pachkov M., Meyer-Schaller N., Schübeler D., van Nimwegen E., Christofori G. Sox4 is a master regulator of epithelial-mesenchymal transition by controlling Ezh2 expression and epigenetic reprogramming. Cancer Cell. 2013;23:768–783. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2013.04.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Mikhaylova M., Mori N., Wildes F.B., Walczak P., Gimi B., Bhujwalla Z.M. Hypoxia increases breast cancer cell-induced lymphatic endothelial cell migration. Neoplasia. 2008;10:380–IN385. doi: 10.1593/neo.07854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Tan C., Zhang L., Cheng X., Lin X.-F., Lu R.-R., Bao J.-D., Yu H.-X. Curcumin inhibits hypoxia-induced migration in K1 papillary thyroid cancer cells. Experimental biology and medicine. 2015;240:925–935. doi: 10.1177/1535370214555665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Tan Z., Huang Q., Zang J., Teng S.-F., Chen T.-R., Wei H.-f., Song D.-W., Liu T.-L., Yang X.-H., Fu C.-G. HIF-1α activates hypoxia-induced BCL-9 expression in human colorectal cancer cells. Oncotarget. 2017;8 doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.8834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Tang Z.-N., Zhang F., Tang P., Qi X.-W., Jiang J. Hypoxia induces RANK and RANKL expression by activating HIF-1α in breast cancer cells. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2011;408:411–416. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.04.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Kadonaga J.T., Carner K.R., Masiarz F.R., Tjian R. Isolation of cDNA encoding transcription factor Sp1 and functional analysis of the DNA binding domain. Cell. 1987;51:1079–1090. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90594-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Wei D., Wang L., He Y., Xiong H.Q., Abbruzzese J.L., Xie K. Celecoxib inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor expression in and reduces angiogenesis and metastasis of human pancreatic cancer via suppression of Sp1 transcription factor activity. Cancer Res. 2004;64:2030–2038. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-03-1945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Miller D.M., Thomas S.D., Islam A., Muench D., Sedoris K. c-Myc and cancer metabolism. Clin. Cancer Res. 2012;18:5546–5553. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-0977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Cho K.B., Cho M.K., Lee W.Y., Kang K.W. Overexpression of c-myc induces epithelial mesenchymal transition in mammary epithelial cells. Cancer letters. 2010;293:230–239. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2010.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Ma L., Young J., Prabhala H., Pan E., Mestdagh P., Muth D., Teruya-Feldstein J., Reinhardt F., Onder T.T., Valastyan S. miR-9, a MYC/MYCN-activated microRNA, regulates E-cadherin and cancer metastasis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2010;12:247–256. doi: 10.1038/ncb2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Khew-Goodall Y., Goodall G.J. Myc-modulated miR-9 makes more metastases. Nat. Cell Biol. 2010;12:209–211. doi: 10.1038/ncb0310-209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Neuzillet C., de Gramont A., Tijeras-Raballand A., de Mestier L., Cros J., Faivre S., Raymond E. Perspectives of TGF-β inhibition in pancreatic and hepatocellular carcinomas. Oncotarget. 2014;5:78–94. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.1569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Truty M.J., Urrutia R. Basics of TGF-beta and pancreatic cancer. Pancreatology. 2007;7:423–435. doi: 10.1159/000108959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Kang J.S., Liu C., Derynck R. New regulatory mechanisms of TGF-beta receptor function. Trends Cell Biol. 2009;19:385–394. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2009.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Padua D., Massagué J. Roles of TGFbeta in metastasis. Cell Res. 2009;19:89–102. doi: 10.1038/cr.2008.316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Shi Y., Massagué J. Mechanisms of TGF-beta signaling from cell membrane to the nucleus. Cell. 2003;113:685–700. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00432-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Xu J., Lamouille S., Derynck R. TGF-beta-induced epithelial to mesenchymal transition. Cell Res. 2009;19:156–172. doi: 10.1038/cr.2009.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Lamouille S., Xu J., Derynck R. Molecular mechanisms of epithelial–mesenchymal transition. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014;15:178–196. doi: 10.1038/nrm3758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Vincent T., Neve E., Johnson J.R., Kukalev A., Rojo F., Albanell J., Pietras K., Virtanen I., Philipson L., Leopold P.L. A SNAIL1–SMAD3/4 transcriptional repressor complex promotes TGF-β mediated epithelial–mesenchymal transition. Nat. Cell Biol. 2009;11:943–950. doi: 10.1038/ncb1905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Zheng X., Carstens J.L., Kim J., Scheible M., Kaye J., Sugimoto H., Wu C.-C., LeBleu V.S., Kalluri R. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition is dispensable for metastasis but induces chemoresistance in pancreatic cancer. Nature. 2015;527:525–530. doi: 10.1038/nature16064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Pasquinelli A.E., Reinhart B.J., Slack F., Martindale M.Q., Kuroda M.I., Maller B., Hayward D.C., Ball E.E., Degnan B., Müller P., Spring J., Srinivasan A., Fishman M., Finnerty J., Corbo J., Levine M., Leahy P., Davidson E., Ruvkun G. Conservation of the sequence and temporal expression of let-7 heterochronic regulatory RNA. Nature. 2000;408:86–89. doi: 10.1038/35040556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Bai Y., Ying Y. The post-translational modifications of Smurf2 in TGF-β signaling. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2020;7:128. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2020.00128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Vivekanandhan S., Mukhopadhyay D. Seminars in Cancer Biology. Elsevier; 2019. Genetic status of KRAS influences Transforming Growth Factor-beta (TGF-β) signaling: an insight into Neuropilin-1 (NRP1) mediated tumorigenesis; pp. 72–79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Itoh K., Yoshioka K., Akedo H., Uehata M., Ishizaki T., Narumiya S. An essential part for Rho-associated kinase in the transcellular invasion of tumor cells. Nat Med. 1999;5:221–225. doi: 10.1038/5587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Sahai E., Marshall C.J. RHO-GTPases and cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2002;2:133–142. doi: 10.1038/nrc725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Xu T., Wu M., Feng J., Lin X., Gu Z. RhoA/Rho kinase signaling regulates transforming growth factor-β1-induced chondrogenesis and actin organization of synovium-derived mesenchymal stem cells through interaction with the Smad pathway. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2012;30:1119–1125. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2012.1107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Chen S., Crawford M., Day R.M., Briones V.R., Leader J.E., Jose P.A., Lechleider R.J. RhoA modulates Smad signaling during transforming growth factor-β-induced smooth muscle differentiation. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:1765–1770. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M507771200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Li J., Wang G., Wang C., Zhao Y., Zhang H., Tan Z., Song Z., Ding M., Deng H. MEK/ERK signaling contributes to the maintenance of human embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Differentiation. 2007;75:299–307. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-0436.2006.00143.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Chen Y., Ouyang G.-L., Yi H., Li M.-Y., Zhang P.-F., Li C., Li J.-L., Liu Y.-F., Chen Z.-C., Xiao Z.-Q. Identification of RKIP as an invasion suppressor protein in nasopharyngeal carcinoma by proteomic analysis. J. Proteome Res. 2008;7:5254–5262. doi: 10.1021/pr800602c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Marmor M.D., Skaria K.B., Yarden Y. Signal transduction and oncogenesis by ErbB/HER receptors. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2004;58:903–913. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Pruitt K., Der C.J. Ras and Rho regulation of the cell cycle and oncogenesis. Cancer letters. 2001;171:1–10. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3835(01)00528-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Xie L., Law B.K., Chytil A.M., Brown K.A., Aakre M.E., Moses H.L. Activation of the Erk pathway is required for TGF-β1-induced EMT in vitro. Neoplasia. 2004;6:603–610. doi: 10.1593/neo.04241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Peinado H., Quintanilla M., Cano A. Transforming growth factor β-1 induces snail transcription factor in epithelial cell lines: mechanisms for epithelial mesenchymal transitions. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:21113–21123. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M211304200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Muqbil I., Wu J., Aboukameel A., Mohammad R.M., Azmi A.S. Seminars in Cancer Biology. Elsevier; 2014. Snail nuclear transport: the gateways regulating epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition? pp. 39–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Diederichs S., Haber D.A. Dual role for argonautes in microRNA processing and posttranscriptional regulation of microRNA expression. Cell. 2007;131:1097–1108. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.10.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Sanduja S., Blanco F.F., Young L.E., Kaza V., Dixon D.A. The role of tristetraprolin in cancer and inflammation. Frontiers in bioscience: a journal and virtual library. 2012;17:174. doi: 10.2741/3920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Marchese F.P., Aubareda A., Tudor C., Saklatvala J., Clark A.R., Dean J.L. MAPKAP kinase 2 blocks tristetraprolin-directed mRNA decay by inhibiting CAF1 deadenylase recruitment. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285:27590–27600. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.136473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Bourcier C., Griseri P., Grépin R., Bertolotto C., Mazure N., Pagès G. Constitutive ERK activity induces downregulation of tristetraprolin, a major protein controlling interleukin8/CXCL8 mRNA stability in melanoma cells. American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology. 2011;301:C609–C618. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00506.2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Larue L., Bellacosa A. Epithelial–mesenchymal transition in development and cancer: role of phosphatidylinositol 3′ kinase/AKT pathways. Oncogene. 2005;24:7443–7454. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Sheng W., Shi X., Lin Y., Tang J., Jia C., Cao R., Sun J., Wang G., Zhou L., Dong M. Musashi2 promotes EGF-induced EMT in pancreatic cancer via ZEB1-ERK/MAPK signaling. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2020;39:1–15. doi: 10.1186/s13046-020-1521-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Kolch W., Pitt A. Functional proteomics to dissect tyrosine kinase signalling pathways in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2010;10:618–629. doi: 10.1038/nrc2900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Wagner J.P., Wolf-Yadlin A., Sevecka M., Grenier J.K., Root D.E., Lauffenburger D.A., MacBeath G. Receptor tyrosine kinases fall into distinct classes based on their inferred signaling networks. Sci. Signal. 2013;6 doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2003994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Ouyang H., Gore J., Deitz S., Korc M. microRNA-10b enhances pancreatic cancer cell invasion by suppressing TIP30 expression and promoting EGF and TGF-β actions. Oncogene. 2014;33:4664–4674. doi: 10.1038/onc.2013.405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Xu W., Yang Z., Lu N. A new role for the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway in the epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Cell Adhes. Migrat. 2015;9:317–324. doi: 10.1080/19336918.2015.1016686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Navaei Z.N., Khalili-Tanha G., Zangouei A.S., Abbaszadegan M.R., Moghbeli M. PI3K/AKT signaling pathway as a critical regulator of Cisplatin response in tumor cells. Oncology research. 2021;29:235–250. doi: 10.32604/or.2022.025323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Maharati A., Moghbeli M. Long non-coding RNAs as the critical regulators of PI3K/AKT, TGF-beta, and MAPK signaling pathways during breast tumor progression. J. Transl. Med. 2023;21:556. doi: 10.1186/s12967-023-04434-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Tester A.M., Ruangpanit N., Anderson R.L., Thompson E.W. MMP-9 secretion and MMP-2 activation distinguish invasive and metastatic sublines of a mouse mammary carcinoma system showing epithelial-mesenchymal transition traits. Clin. Exp. Metastasis. 2000;18:553–560. doi: 10.1023/a:1011953118186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Kang M.H., Oh S.C., Lee H.J., Kang H.N., Kim J.L., Kim J.S., Yoo Y.A. Metastatic function of BMP-2 in gastric cancer cells: the role of PI3K/AKT, MAPK, the NF-κB pathway, and MMP-9 expression. Experimental cell research. 2011;317:1746–1762. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2011.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Zuo J.H., Zhu W., Li M.Y., Li X.H., Yi H., Zeng G.Q., Wan X.X., He Q.Y., Li J.H., Qu J.Q. Activation of EGFR promotes squamous carcinoma SCC10A cell migration and invasion via inducing EMT‐like phenotype change and MMP‐9‐mediated degradation of E‐cadherin. J. Cell. Biochem. 2011;112:2508–2517. doi: 10.1002/jcb.23175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Wu N., Liu S., Guo C., Hou Z., Sun M.-Z. The role of annexin A3 playing in cancers. Clin. Transl. Oncol. 2013;15:106–110. doi: 10.1007/s12094-012-0928-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Zhang Z., Kong Z., Zhu M., Lu W., Ni L., Bai Y., Lou Y. Whole genome sequencing identifies ANXA3 and MTHFR mutations in a large family with an unknown equinus deformity associated genetic disorder. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2016;43:1147–1155. doi: 10.1007/s11033-016-4047-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Fu F., Yang X., Zheng M., Zhao Q., Zhang K., Li Z., Zhang H., Zhang S. Role of transmembrane 4 L six family 1 in the development and progression of cancer. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2020;7:202. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2020.00202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Garrett S.C., Varney K.M., Weber D.J., Bresnick A.R. S100A4, a mediator of metastasis. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:677–680. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R500017200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Arumugam T., Simeone D.M., Van Golen K., Logsdon C.D. S100P promotes pancreatic cancer growth, survival, and invasion. Clin. Cancer Res. 2005;11:5356–5364. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Camara R., Ogbeni D., Gerstmann L., Ostovar M., Hurer E., Scott M., Mahmoud N.G., Radon T., Crnogorac-Jurcevic T., Patel P. Discovery of novel small molecule inhibitors of S100P with in vitro anti-metastatic effects on pancreatic cancer cells. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2020;203 doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Zuo Z., Zhang P., Lin F., Shang W., Bi R., Lu F., Wu J., Jiang L. Interplay between Trx-1 and S100P promotes colorectal cancer cell epithelial-mesenchymal transition by up-regulating S100A4 through AKT activation. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2018;22:2430–2441. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.13541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Seward D.J., Cubberley G., Kim S., Schonewald M., Zhang L., Tripet B., Bentley D.L. Demethylation of trimethylated histone H3 Lys4 in vivo by JARID1 JmjC proteins. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2007;14:240–242. doi: 10.1038/nsmb1200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Li X., Liu L., Yang S., Song N., Zhou X., Gao J., Yu N., Shan L., Wang Q., Liang J. Histone demethylase KDM5B is a key regulator of genome stability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:7096–7101. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1324036111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Li G., Kanagasabai T., Lu W., Zou M.R., Zhang S.-M., Celada S.I., Izban M.G., Liu Q., Lu T., Ballard B.R. KDM5B is essential for the hyperactivation of PI3K/AKT signaling in prostate tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. 2020;80:4633–4643. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-20-0505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Yan Q., Zhang S.M., Meeth K., Micevic G., Bosenberg M. Histone demethylase KDM5B is critical for PI3K‐AKT‐mTOR signaling and stemness of melanoma. Faseb. J. 2017;31 468.461-468.461. [Google Scholar]
- 150.Xiang Y., Zhu Z., Han G., Ye X., Xu B., Peng Z., Ma Y., Yu Y., Lin H., Chen A.P. JARID1B is a histone H3 lysine 4 demethylase up-regulated in prostate cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104:19226–19231. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0700735104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Ilic M., Ilic I. Epidemiology of pancreatic cancer. World J. Gastroenterol. 2016;22:9694. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i44.9694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Wang Z., Tang F., Qi G., Yuan S., Zhang G., Tang B., He S. KDM5B is overexpressed in gastric cancer and is required for gastric cancer cell proliferation and metastasis. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2015;5:87. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Bivik C., MacDonald R.B., Gunnar E., Mazouni K., Schweisguth F., Thor S. Control of neural daughter cell proliferation by multi-level Notch/Su(H)/E(spl)-HLH signaling. PLoS Genet. 2016;12 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.MacGrogan D., D'Amato G., Travisano S., Martinez-Poveda B., Luxán G., Del Monte-Nieto G., Papoutsi T., Sbroggio M., Bou V., Gomez-Del Arco P., Gómez M.J., Zhou B., Redondo J.M., Jiménez-Borreguero L.J., de la Pompa J.L. Sequential ligand-dependent Notch signaling activation regulates valve primordium formation and morphogenesis. Circ. Res. 2016;118:1480–1497. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.308077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Moghbeli M., Abbaszadegan M.R., Golmakani E., Forghanifard M.M. Correlation of Wnt and NOTCH pathways in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Journal of cell communication and signaling. 2016;10:129–135. doi: 10.1007/s12079-016-0320-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Abbaszadegan M.R., Moghbeli M. Role of MAML1 and MEIS1 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma depth of invasion. Pathol. Oncol. Res. 2018;24:245–250. doi: 10.1007/s12253-017-0243-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Zhang L., Sha J., Yang G., Huang X., Bo J., Huang Y. Activation of Notch pathway is linked with epithelial-mesenchymal transition in prostate cancer cells. Cell Cycle. 2017;16:999–1007. doi: 10.1080/15384101.2017.1312237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Abbaszadegan M.R., Taghehchian N., Li L., Aarabi A., Moghbeli M. Contribution of KCTD12 to esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2018;18:853. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4765-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Brabletz S., Bajdak K., Meidhof S., Burk U., Niedermann G., Firat E., Wellner U., Dimmler A., Faller G., Schubert J., Brabletz T. The ZEB1/miR-200 feedback loop controls Notch signalling in cancer cells. Embo j. 2011;30:770–782. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2010.349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Bracken C.P., Gregory P.A., Kolesnikoff N., Bert A.G., Wang J., Shannon M.F., Goodall G.J. A double-negative feedback loop between ZEB1-SIP1 and the microRNA-200 family regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Cancer Res. 2008;68:7846–7854. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Wang H., Yu Z., Huo S., Chen Z., Ou Z., Mai J., Ding S., Zhang J. Overexpression of ELF3 facilitates cell growth and metastasis through PI3K/Akt and ERK signaling pathways in non-small cell lung cancer. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2018;94:98–106. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2017.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Zheng L., Xu M., Xu J., Wu K., Fang Q., Liang Y., Zhou S., Cen D., Ji L., Han W., Cai X. ELF3 promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition by protecting ZEB1 from miR-141-3p-mediated silencing in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:387. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-0399-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Kar A., Gutierrez-Hartmann A. ESE-1/ELF3 mRNA expression associates with poor survival outcomes in HER2(+) breast cancer patients and is critical for tumorigenesis in HER2(+) breast cancer cells. Oncotarget. 2017;8:69622–69640. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.18710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Yeung T.L., Leung C.S., Wong K.K., Gutierrez-Hartmann A., Kwong J., Gershenson D.M., Mok S.C. ELF3 is a negative regulator of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in ovarian cancer cells. Oncotarget. 2017;8:16951–16963. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.15208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.El-Sahli S., Xie Y., Wang L., Liu S. Wnt signaling in cancer metabolism and immunity. Cancers. 2019;11:904. doi: 10.3390/cancers11070904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Montazer M., Taghehchian N., Mojarrad M., Moghbeli M. Role of microRNAs in regulation of WNT signaling pathway in urothelial and prostate cancers. Egyptian Journal of Medical Human Genetics. 2022;23:1–12. [Google Scholar]
- 167.Thomas S., Snowden J., Zeidler M., Danson S. The role of JAK/STAT signalling in the pathogenesis, prognosis and treatment of solid tumours. British journal of cancer. 2015;113:365–371. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Moghbeli M., Abbaszadegan M.R., Farshchian M., Montazer M., Raeisossadati R., Abdollahi A., Forghanifard M.M. Association of PYGO2 and EGFR in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Medical oncology. 2013;30:1–9. doi: 10.1007/s12032-013-0516-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Chen H., Wang Y., Xue F. Expression and the clinical significance of Wnt10a and Wnt10b in endometrial cancer are associated with the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Oncol. Rep. 2013;29:507–514. doi: 10.3892/or.2012.2126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Aprelikova O., Palla J., Hibler B., Yu X., Greer Y.E., Yi M., Stephens R., Maxwell G.L., Jazaeri A., Risinger J.I., Rubin J.S., Niederhuber J. Silencing of miR-148a in cancer-associated fibroblasts results in WNT10B-mediated stimulation of tumor cell motility. Oncogene. 2013;32:3246–3253. doi: 10.1038/onc.2012.351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Katoh M., Katoh M. WNT signaling pathway and stem cell signaling network. Clin. Cancer Res. 2007;13:4042–4045. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Fu X., Hong L., Yang Z., Tu Y., Xin W., Zha M., Tu S., Sun G., Li Y., Xiao W. MicroRNA-148a-3p suppresses epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and stemness properties via Wnt1-mediated Wnt/β-catenin pathway in pancreatic cancer. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2020;24:13020–13035. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.15900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Zhuang L., Wang X., Wang Z., Ma X., Han B., Zou H., Wu Z., Dong S., Qu Z., Zang Y. MicroRNA-23b functions as an oncogene and activates AKT/GSK3β/β-catenin signaling by targeting ST7L in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8 doi: 10.1038/cddis.2017.216. e2804-e2804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Yang Z., Wang X.-l., Bai R., Liu W.-y., Li X., Liu M., Tang H. miR-23a promotes IKKα expression but suppresses ST7L expression to contribute to the malignancy of epithelial ovarian cancer cells. British journal of cancer. 2016;115:731–740. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 175.Wang H., Sun L., Jiang J., Yu S., Zhou Q. Suppression of the proliferation and invasion of breast cancer cells by ST 7L occurs through inhibition of activation of Wnt/GSK‐3β/β‐catenin signalling. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2020;47:119–126. doi: 10.1111/1440-1681.13166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Zanconato F., Cordenonsi M., Piccolo S. YAP and TAZ: a signalling hub of the tumour microenvironment. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2019;19:454–464. doi: 10.1038/s41568-019-0168-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Hansen C.G., Moroishi T., Guan K.-L. YAP and TAZ: a nexus for Hippo signaling and beyond. Trends Cell Biol. 2015;25:499–513. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2015.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Seif F., Khoshmirsafa M., Aazami H., Mohsenzadegan M., Sedighi G., Bahar M. The role of JAK-STAT signaling pathway and its regulators in the fate of T helper cells. Cell Commun. Signal. 2017;15:1–13. doi: 10.1186/s12964-017-0177-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Jin W. Role of JAK/STAT3 signaling in the regulation of metastasis, the transition of cancer stem cells, and chemoresistance of cancer by epithelial–mesenchymal transition. Cells. 2020;9:217. doi: 10.3390/cells9010217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Yang L., Dong Y., Li Y., Wang D., Liu S., Wang D., Gao Q., Ji S., Chen X., Lei Q. IL‐10 derived from M2 macrophage promotes cancer stemness via JAK1/STAT1/NF‐κB/Notch1 pathway in non‐small cell lung cancer. Int. J. Cancer. 2019;145:1099–1110. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Zhang Y., Ma C.A., Lawrence M.G., Break T.J., O'Connell M.P., Lyons J.J., López D.B., Barber J.S., Zhao Y., Barber D.L. PD-L1 up-regulation restrains Th17 cell differentiation in STAT3 loss-and STAT1 gain-of-function patients. J. Exp. Med. 2017;214:2523–2533. doi: 10.1084/jem.20161427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Dey B.K., Pfeifer K., Dutta A. The H19 long noncoding RNA gives rise to microRNAs miR-675-3p and miR-675-5p to promote skeletal muscle differentiation and regeneration. Genes Dev. 2014;28:491–501. doi: 10.1101/gad.234419.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Hao Y., Crenshaw T., Moulton T., Newcomb E., Tycko B. Tumour-suppressor activity of H19 RNA. Nature. 1993;365:764–767. doi: 10.1038/365764a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Kershaw N.J., Murphy J.M., Liau N.P., Varghese L.N., Laktyushin A., Whitlock E.L., Lucet I.S., Nicola N.A., Babon J.J. SOCS3 binds specific receptor–JAK complexes to control cytokine signaling by direct kinase inhibition. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2013;20:469–476. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Croker B.A., Kiu H., Nicholson S.E. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology. Elsevier; 2008. SOCS regulation of the JAK/STAT signalling pathway; pp. 414–422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Vinchure O.S., Sharma V., Tabasum S., Ghosh S., Singh R.P., Sarkar C., Kulshreshtha R. Polycomb complex mediated epigenetic reprogramming alters TGF‐β signaling via a novel EZH2/miR‐490/TGIF2 axis thereby inducing migration and EMT potential in glioblastomas. Int. J. Cancer. 2019;145:1254–1269. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Qi W., Zhao K., Gu J., Huang Y., Wang Y., Zhang H., Zhang M., Zhang J., Yu Z., Li L., Teng L., Chuai S., Zhang C., Zhao M., Chan H., Chen Z., Fang D., Fei Q., Feng L., Feng L., Gao Y., Ge H., Ge X., Li G., Lingel A., Lin Y., Liu Y., Luo F., Shi M., Wang L., Wang Z., Yu Y., Zeng J., Zeng C., Zhang L., Zhang Q., Zhou S., Oyang C., Atadja P., Li E. An allosteric PRC2 inhibitor targeting the H3K27me3 binding pocket of EED. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2017;13:381–388. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Jin X., Yang C., Fan P., Xiao J., Zhang W., Zhan S., Liu T., Wang D., Wu H. CDK5/FBW7-dependent ubiquitination and degradation of EZH2 inhibits pancreatic cancer cell migration and invasion. J. Biol. Chem. 2017;292:6269–6280. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.764407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67:7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Ma J., Zhang J., Weng Y.C., Wang J.C. EZH2-Mediated microRNA-139-5p regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition and lymph node metastasis of pancreatic cancer. Mol Cells. 2018;41:868–880. doi: 10.14348/molcells.2018.0109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Engelsen I., Mannelqvist M., Stefansson I., Carter S., Beroukhim R., Øyan A., Otte A., Kalland K., Akslen L., Salvesen H. Low BMI-1 expression is associated with an activated BMI-1-driven signature, vascular invasion, and hormone receptor loss in endometrial carcinoma. British journal of cancer. 2008;98:1662–1669. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Akl M.R., Nagpal P., Ayoub N.M., Prabhu S.A., Gliksman M., Tai B., Hatipoglu A., Goy A., Suh K.S. Molecular and clinical profiles of syndecan-1 in solid and hematological cancer for prognosis and precision medicine. Oncotarget. 2015;6:28693–28715. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.4981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Gharbaran R. Advances in the molecular functions of syndecan-1 (SDC1/CD138) in the pathogenesis of malignancies. Crit. Rev. Oncol.-Hematol. 2015;94:1–17. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2014.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.Nissen N.I., Karsdal M., Willumsen N. Collagens and Cancer associated fibroblasts in the reactive stroma and its relation to Cancer biology. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019;38:1–12. doi: 10.1186/s13046-019-1110-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195.Chen P., Cescon M., Bonaldo P. Collagen VI in cancer and its biological mechanisms. Trends Mol. Med. 2013;19:410–417. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2013.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Kourtidis A., Ngok S.P., Anastasiadis P.Z. p120 catenin: an essential regulator of cadherin stability, adhesion-induced signaling, and cancer progression. Progress in molecular biology and translational science. 2013;116:409–432. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-394311-8.00018-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Sato K., Watanabe T., Wang S., Kakeno M., Matsuzawa K., Matsui T., Yokoi K., Murase K., Sugiyama I., Ozawa M. Numb controls E-cadherin endocytosis through p120 catenin with aPKC. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2011;22:3103–3119. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E11-03-0274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198.Greco C., Bralet M.-P., Ailane N., Dubart-Kupperschmitt A., Rubinstein E., Le Naour F., Boucheix C. E-Cadherin/p120-Catenin and tetraspanin Co-029 cooperate for cell motility control in human colon CarcinomaE-cadherin/p120ctn and Co-029 control motility. Cancer Res. 2010;70:7674–7683. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-4482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199.Hamada S., Satoh K., Miura S., Hirota M., Kanno A., Masamune A., Kikuta K., Kume K., Unno J., Egawa S., Motoi F., Unno M., Shimosegawa T. miR-197 induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition in pancreatic cancer cells by targeting p120 catenin. J. Cell. Physiol. 2013;228:1255–1263. doi: 10.1002/jcp.24280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200.Brown R.L., Reinke L.M., Damerow M.S., Perez D., Chodosh L.A., Yang J., Cheng C. CD44 splice isoform switching in human and mouse epithelium is essential for epithelial-mesenchymal transition and breast cancer progression. J. Clin. Invest. 2011;121:1064–1074. doi: 10.1172/JCI44540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201.Mima K., Okabe H., Ishimoto T., Hayashi H., Nakagawa S., Kuroki H., Watanabe M., Beppu T., Tamada M., Nagano O., Saya H., Baba H. CD44s regulates the TGF-β-mediated mesenchymal phenotype and is associated with poor prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2012;72:3414–3423. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-0299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202.Ishii H., Saitoh M., Sakamoto K., Kondo T., Katoh R., Tanaka S., Motizuki M., Masuyama K., Miyazawa K. Epithelial splicing regulatory proteins 1 (ESRP1) and 2 (ESRP2) suppress cancer cell motility via different mechanisms. J. Biol. Chem. 2014;289:27386–27399. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.589432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 203.Voena C., Varesio L.M., Zhang L., Menotti M., Poggio T., Panizza E., Wang Q., Minero V.G., Fagoonee S., Compagno M., Altruda F., Monti S., Chiarle R. Oncogenic ALK regulates EMT in non-small cell lung carcinoma through repression of the epithelial splicing regulatory protein 1. Oncotarget. 2016;7:33316–33330. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.8955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204.Yae T., Tsuchihashi K., Ishimoto T., Motohara T., Yoshikawa M., Yoshida G.J., Wada T., Masuko T., Mogushi K., Tanaka H. Alternative splicing of CD44 mRNA by ESRP1 enhances lung colonization of metastatic cancer cell. Nat. Commun. 2012;3:1–9. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205.Mansouri A., Foroughmand A.M., Abbaszadegan M.R., Memar B., Mahmoudian R.A., Gholamin M. Expression analysis of CD44 isoforms S and V3, in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Iranian journal of basic medical sciences. 2015;18:380. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206.Zhai X., Yang Y., Wan J., Zhu R., Wu Y. Inhibition of LDH-A by oxamate induces G2/M arrest, apoptosis and increases radiosensitivity in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Oncol. Rep. 2013;30:2983–2991. doi: 10.3892/or.2013.2735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207.Xiao X., Huang X., Ye F., Chen B., Song C., Wen J., Zhang Z., Zheng G., Tang H., Xie X. The miR-34a-LDHA axis regulates glucose metabolism and tumor growth in breast cancer. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:1–9. doi: 10.1038/srep21735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 208.Pathria G., Scott D.A., Feng Y., Sang Lee J., Fujita Y., Zhang G., Sahu A.D., Ruppin E., Herlyn M., Osterman A.L. Targeting the Warburg effect via LDHA inhibition engages ATF 4 signaling for cancer cell survival. The EMBO journal. 2018;37 doi: 10.15252/embj.201899735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 209.Zhao J., Huang X., Xu Z., Dai J., He H., Zhu Y., Wang H. LDHA promotes tumor metastasis by facilitating epithelial-mesenchymal transition in renal cell carcinoma. Mol. Med. Rep. 2017;16:8335–8344. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2017.7637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210.Besson A., Gurian-West M., Schmidt A., Hall A., Roberts J.M. p27Kip1 modulates cell migration through the regulation of RhoA activation. Genes Dev. 2004;18:862–876. doi: 10.1101/gad.1185504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 211.Besson A., Assoian R.K., Roberts J.M. Regulation of the cytoskeleton: an oncogenic function for CDK inhibitors? Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2004;4:948–955. doi: 10.1038/nrc1501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 212.Wang Z., Ahmad A., Li Y., Kong D., Azmi A.S., Banerjee S., Sarkar F.H. Emerging roles of PDGF-D signaling pathway in tumor development and progression. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2010;1806:122–130. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2010.04.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 213.Kong D., Li Y., Wang Z., Banerjee S., Ahmad A., Kim H.R., Sarkar F.H. miR-200 regulates PDGF-D-mediated epithelial-mesenchymal transition, adhesion, and invasion of prostate cancer cells. Stem Cell. 2009;27:1712–1721. doi: 10.1002/stem.101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 214.Stinson S., Lackner M.R., Adai A.T., Yu N., Kim H.J., O'Brien C., Spoerke J., Jhunjhunwala S., Boyd Z., Januario T., Newman R.J., Yue P., Bourgon R., Modrusan Z., Stern H.M., Warming S., de Sauvage F.J., Amler L., Yeh R.F., Dornan D. TRPS1 targeting by miR-221/222 promotes the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in breast cancer. Sci. Signal. 2011;4 doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2001538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 215.Al-Shihabi A., Chawla S.P., Hall F.L., Gordon E.M. Exploiting oncogenic drivers along the CCNG1 pathway for cancer therapy and gene therapy. Molecular Therapy-Oncolytics. 2018;11:122–126. doi: 10.1016/j.omto.2018.11.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 216.Yan J., Jiang J.-y., Meng X.-N., Xiu Y.-L., Zong Z.-H. MiR-23b targets cyclin G1 and suppresses ovarian cancer tumorigenesis and progression. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016;35:1–10. doi: 10.1186/s13046-016-0307-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 217.Zhao Y., Wang Y., Xing G. miR-516b functions as a tumor suppressor by directly modulating CCNG1 expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018;106:1650–1660. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.07.074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.






