Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 2;37(2):471–488. doi: 10.1007/s10278-024-00985-3

Table 4.

Performance of 12 language models on Deauville score prediction

Models 5-Class Accuracy (%) Weighted Cohen’s κ
PGN 53.5 [46.9, 60.2] 0.528 [0.445, 0.605]
BERT2BERT 69.7 [64.9, 74.3] 0.762 [0.716, 0.805]
BART 75.3 [70.6, 79.7] † 0.806 [0.760, 0.846] †
BioBART 73.9 [69.7, 78.1] † 0.802 [0.761, 0.840] †
PEGASUS 76.7 [72.0, 81.0] * 0.811 [0.767, 0.852] †
T5 76.3 [72.0, 80.6] † 0.814 [0.772, 0.853] *
Clinical-T5 72.5 [67.7, 77.0] † 0.788 [0.745, 0.829] †
FLAN-T5 72.6 [68.0, 77.2] † 0.798 [0.757, 0.837] †
GPT2 71.3 [65.8, 76.4] 0.768 [0.715, 0.817] †
OPT 63.1 [57.7, 68.6] 0.718 [0.665, 0.767]
LLaMA-LoRA 62.9 [56.8, 68.7] 0.708 [0.647, 0.763]
Alpaca-LoRA 70.6 [64.9, 75.8] 0.754 [0.696, 0.805]

Note that data are shown as mean [2.5th percentile, 97.5th percentile]. “*” denotes the best model for each metric, and “†” denotes the other models that have no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05) with the best model