Abstract
Neuroblastoma is an example of a difficult-to-treat tumor with high incidence of relapse. DNA vaccination could be applied as a relapse prophylactic option for patients with high-risk neuroblastoma. Its efficacy depends directly on a target antigen of choice and a delivery method. Three neuroblastoma-associated antigens (tyrosine hydroxylase, Survivin, PHOX2B) and two delivery methods were investigated. Our data suggest that antigen PHOX2B is a more immunogenic target that induces cellular immune response and tumor regression more effectively than tyrosine hydroxylase and Survivin. Immunogenicity testing revealed that the delivery of DNA vaccine by Salmonella enterica was accompanied by a stronger immune response (cytotoxicity and IFNγ production) than that by DNA–polyethylenimine conjugate. Nevertheless, intramuscular immunization with PEI led to higher decrease of tumor volume compared to that after oral gavage with Salmonella vaccine.
Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (10.1007/s00262-020-02652-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Keywords: DNA vaccine, Neuroblastoma, PHOX2B, Polyethylenimine, Salmonella enterica
Introduction
Neuroblastoma (NB) is a good example of a difficult-to-treat tumor because of rare gene mutations, narrow epitope landscape, high progression rate and many ways of immune escape [1, 2]. NB is a severe pediatric extracranial cancer of the sympathetic nervous system, accounting for approximately 8% of all childhood cancers and 15% of childhood cancer mortality. The most vulnerable group of patients are those with a high-risk NB (HRNB), which requires intense multimodal treatment. A combination of radiation therapy, autologous stem cell transplantation, immunotherapy, and the differentiating agents has ensured an increase of patients’ survival rate up to 50%. A relapse problem remains topical and happens to almost 55% of HRNB patients [3]. Immunotherapy is a good relapse-preventing option during the maintenance phase after achieving remission.
Among the vast diversity of immunotherapeutic approaches, DNA vaccination has firmly taken its place and is actively studied in cancer therapy [4–6]. It implies the administration of bacterial plasmid DNA encoding target tumor antigens into the body, where DNA is endocytosed by the cells and transcribed by their genetic apparatus. DNA vaccination predominantly elicits Th1 and CD8 + immune response [7]. Vaccination is intended to break tolerance to self-antigens and direct immunity against cancer cells. A tumor target and a delivery method are the most important factors for the DNA vaccine efficacy. A choice of target tumor antigens has always been an open question for almost all cancer types. In practice, only viral-induced tumors and tumors with somatic and germline mutations or expression of specific antigens carry suitable markers for targeting. This approach needs an identification of patient-specific antigen profile, which is expensive and often not effective. There is another widespread group of antigens called tumor-associated antigens (TAA). They are characterized by highly aberrant expression in the tumor cells, but their immunogenicity is low because of self-tolerance. In the list of NB antigens that have previously been tested as targets for DNA vaccination are HuD, tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), Survivin, MYCN and legumain. It was shown that all of them induced cellular and/or humoral immune response and slowed down tumor growth [8–12]. PHOX2B is another well-known gene with high expression in NB cells. It serves as a marker for minimal residual disease monitoring in NB and is not expressed in other tissues except neural [13]. PHOX2B has not been previously studied in a mouse model as a target for DNA vaccination and could be a perspective antigen.
Nowadays, a number of plasmid DNA delivery methods have been developed. Electroporation is the gold standard of DNA vaccine delivery [14]. However, modern medicine requires carriers to possess immunostimulating properties. There are synthetic and biological molecules, which not only facilitate transfection of the cells and delivery of vaccines directly to the destination, but also stimulate additional activation of the immune system [15, 16]. Polyethylenimine (PEI) takes a special place among non-viral nucleic acid transfer agents. PEI-based transfection reagents are commercially available, for example ExGene500®, jetPEI® and PEIproTM® [17]. PEI has not been previously studied in DNA vaccination against NB, but demonstrated elevation of antigen expression from plasmid DNA [18]. Salmonella enterica became the most studied bacterial DNA carrier because of its pathogenesis mechanism along with Listeria monocytogenes, Yersinia enterocolitica, and Shigella spp. [19]. An attenuated strain of Salmonella delivers nucleic acids directly to the intestinal macrophages under the lamina propria and activates the innate immune response [9, 20]. Lode et al. found that application of Salmonella attenuated strain SL7207 led to anti-NB immune response and tumor regression in a mouse model using different antigens (TH, Survivin, etc.) [9–12].
The first aim of this study was to compare the immunogenicity and therapeutic capacity of DNA vaccines based on three well-known NB-associated antigens (TH, Survivin and PHOX2B) in the syngeneic mouse model. The second aim was to investigate and compare two DNA delivery methods: DNA–PEI injection and bacterial gavage of oral DNA vaccine in Salmonella enterica cells.
Materials and methods
Preparation of DNA vaccine
Plasmid vector pING (courtesy of Jedd D. Wolchok, USA) was used a backbone of the DNA construct. The fragment of TH gene (encoding 124 amino acids from 278 to 401 residues of native tyrosine hydroxylase) which contains the highest density of MHC class I epitopes and protein mouse/human homology was used as an antigen. Full-length cDNA was used for Survivin gene (sequence of 140 amino acids, Ref. # CCDS25694.1). The fragment of PHOX2B gene encoding the N-terminal 161 amino acids with full mouse/human homology was used. The gene of potato virus X coat protein (PVXCP) was added to the C-end of vaccine construct antigen-encoding insert as a fusion via AAAGPGP peptide linker. Immunoglobulin heavy chain leader peptide was added to the N-end of protein to ensure secretion of the protein out of the cell. DNA–PEI conjugate was prepared by mixing 10 μg pDNA with a solution of 15 μg PEI 20 kDa, pH 7.0 (Sigma-Aldrich). An oral form of vaccine was obtained by electroporation of newly designed (aroA, guaAB) attenuated strain of Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium—SS2017 (data not published) with plasmid DNA (DNA–SL). The doses of bacteria (108 per mouse) were measured in CFU, established by serial dilutions of a suspension of bacteria and seeding on plates for counting colonies. Bacterial culture was grown on the LB agar with 50 μg/mL kanamycin.
RT-PCR antigen expression
Total RNA was extracted from the 106 murine neuroblastoma NB41A3 cells with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). 1 μg of total RNA was used for cDNA synthesis. Real-time PCR was performed on the CFX96 One-Touch (Bio-Rad). Total volume of reaction was 25 μL and included forward and reverse primers (6 pmol), TaqMan probe (4 pmol), 2 × TaqMan MasterMix (Applied Biosystems) and MQ water. HPRT gene was used as an internal control. Sequences of the primers are shown in Supplementary Table S1. Reactions were performed in duplicate. Antigen expression was calculated according to the M.V. Pfaffl using calibration curves for each antigen [21].
Cells and mice
NB41A3 murine NB cells were grown in F10 medium (Gibco) supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. C57Bl/6 healthy mice (n = 60) 8–10 weeks of age were used for immunogenicity testing. Three consecutive experiments were conducted with each antigen (TH, Survivin, PHOX2B). A half of set included two control groups: empty vector pING (plasmid control) and bacterial cells without incorporated plasmid DNA (bacterial control). One group of animals was vaccinated thrice intramuscularly (i.m.) with DNA–PEI conjugate and another group with DNA–SL. Bacterial suspension was delivered by intragastric administration. After 2 weeks of monitoring, the mice were killed and all required biological material was extracted. Syngeneic A/J mice (Harlan Lab) (n = 64) of 8–10 weeks of age were used for tumor modeling. Primary tumors were induced by subcutaneous injection of 106 NB41A3 cells and tumor growth was measured by a microcaliper. The tumor volume was calculated according to the formula: width × length × height. Experimental groups were the same as in immunogenicity testing. Mice received three therapeutic vaccinations: 7 days before, 5 and 10 days after tumor engraftment. When primary tumors reached a volume of 4000 mm3 and/or showed signs of necrosis, the mice were killed.
MHC epitope prediction
The MHC-I binding predictions for antigen immunogenicity modeling were made on 12/6/2019 using the IEDB analysis resource Consensus tool [22], which combines predictions from ANN aka NetMHC (4.0) [23–25], SMM [26] and CombLib [27].
Cytotoxicity assay
At the end of the experiment, splenocytes were harvested and incubated in the presence of irradiated NB41A3 NB cells in RPMI 1640 [10% FBS, 1% AA, 50 μmol/L β-mercaptoethanol and 100 units/mL IL-2] at a target:effector (T:E) ratio of 1:10 and 1:25 overnight. Target cells were plated out at a density of 10,000 per well in a 96-well plate. Effector cells were added to duplicate wells at varying T:E ratios. Cytotoxic activity of splenocytes was determined by using a flow cytometry assay (FC500, Backman Coulter, USA). Target cells were prestained with CFSE (carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester) to separate them from effectors; propidium iodide was used for vitality staining. Cytotoxicity was calculated according to lysis (%) = [experimental count of dead cells (cdc)-spontaneous cdc]/[100 − spontaneous cdc] × 100%.
ELISA
The samples of the whole blood were collected from the heart in aseptical conditions. Then, they were centrifuged at 5000 × g to separate serum from cellular fraction. Experimental serum was tested in duplicate in the 1:100 and 1:200 ratios in 96-well plate coated with PVXCP protein. Immobilized anti-PVXCP antibodies were detected with goat anti-mouse antibodies IgG + IgM labeled with horse radish peroxidase (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). The plates were read using a Sunrise™ Absorbance reader (TECAN). Twofold dilution of mouse serum collected from the animals immunized with PVX virus was used as calibrators. Each dilution had a certain amount of related units per mL (1000-125).
ELISPOT
IFN-gamma secretion was determined using the BD™ ELISPOT mouse IFN-γ ELISPOT Set (BD Biosciences, USA). Splenocytes were harvested from individual mice after immunization with a DNA vaccine. Effector cells were plated in duplicate at 2.5 × 105/well in a 200-μL final volume with medium alone, 10 μg of the TH/Survivin/PHOX2B peptide library per ml, and 20 μg of the PVXCP protein per mL or 4 μg of the phytohemagglutinin. Plates were analyzed with an enzyme-linked immunospot assay (ELISPOT) reader (CTL ImmunoSpot® S5 UV Analyzer, C.T.L.,). The mean number of spots from duplicate wells was calculated for each responder animal and adjusted to represent the mean number of spots per 106 splenic cells.
Statistics
The statistical significance of difference between experimental groups was determined by non-parametrical Mann–Whitney U test using GraphPad Prism 6.0 software. Findings were regarded as significant if p values were < 0.05.
Results
Antigen expression in NB41A3
Murine NB41A3 brain origin NB cells were analyzed for antigen expression to establish suitable mouse tumor model. mRNA expression of TH, Survivin and PHOX2B genes was measured by RT-PCR. All investigated antigens were expressed in NB41A3. As shown in Fig. 1, PHOX2B was the most highly expressed antigen. The expression of Survivin was three times less abundant than that of PHOX2B (7.27 ± 2.95 vs 21.07 ± 4.67), and TH demonstrated the lowest expression level (3.57 ± 2.76). RT-PCR data suggest that the chosen antigens could be used as targets for DNA vaccination. Moreover, the absence of genetically engineered enhanced expression allows to analyze the influence of antigen expression level on immunogenicity.
Fig. 1.

Relative expression level of neuroblastoma-associated antigens in murine NB41A3 neuroblastoma cell line calculated accordingly to Pfaffl [21]. Each sample was analyzed in duplicates twice. Mean ± SEM
Antigen immunogenicity
Antigen immunogenicity (IG) depends on several parameters such as the size of a molecule, amino acids diversity, presence of aromatic amino acids, and solubility. The efficiency of MHC-ligand processing and binding affinity are additional factors determining the induction of immune response [29]. Selected antigens were analyzed for the most common immunogenicity parameters to predict the best option for DNA vaccination. Antigens were scored points for each parameter from 1 (the worth result) to 3 (the best result). Summing up the points resulted in the final scores represented in Table 1. PHOX2B protein contains more amino acids than other contenders, the majority of which are aromatic. MHC-I epitope binding prediction was performed using immune epitope database-analysis resource (IEBB-AR) for both mouse strains used in the experiments. Only T cell epitopes with percentile affinity rank less than 10 were considered as highly immunogenic. TH and PHOX2B antigens have more suitable epitopes for H2Kb haplotypes corresponding to C57Bl/6 mice and Survivin includes epitopes predominantly for H2Kk from A/J mice. Median affinity binding level of selected epitopes also have different values for mouse strains. According to the total IG score, theoretical immunogenicity of antigens increased in the following order: TH → Survivin → PHOX2B for both mouse strains.
Table 1.
Antigen immunogenicity prediction
| N (AA) | N (aAA) | N (T-cell epitopes with PR < 10)a | Me PR (min–max)a | Total IG scorea | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TH | 124 | 8 | 27/13 | 4.9 (0.23–9.75)/5.2 (1.4–8.85) | 7/4 |
| Survivin | 140 | 14 | 17/21 | 3.85 (0.5–9.85)/5.9 (0.4–8.4) | 8/8 |
| PHOX2B | 158 | 19 | 24/18 | 5.25 (0.12–9.5)/4.9 (1.2–9.2) | 9/11 |
AA amino acids, aAA aromatic amino acids, IG immunogenicity. TH and PHOX2B minigenes were used in vaccine design. The number of T-cell epitopes includes only those where percentile rank (PR) was < 10
aMHC-I binding prediction was performed for two mouse haplotypes H2Kb/H2Kk
Preliminary screening of the antigens for immunogenicity revealed that PHOX2B had the greater potential for inducing a strong immune response than other investigated proteins according to in silico testing. There are many factors that can be taken into account in mathematical models, and their biological testing on animals is a prerequisite in the process of finding the ideal candidate for vaccination.
To assess immunogenicity of selected antigens in vivo, three independent experiments were conducted. C57Bl/6 mice were vaccinated three times with each of DNA vaccine. As was shown by a cytotoxicity test, DNA vaccination led to increase of target cell killing in almost all treated groups of mice compared to the vector control. As shown in Fig. 2a–c, the DNA–PEI conjugate elicited significant T-cell cellular immune response for each antigen and their combination except TH (Fig. 2a), where the percentage of lysed cells was comparable with that in the control group (3.4% and 4.9% in control vs 2.9 and 5% in the TH–PEI, target:effector ratio 1:10 and 1:25, respectively). Oral gavage with S. enterica induced a strong cellular immune response against target cells, which was at least two times higher than that after DNA–PEI for all antigens (p < 0.05). The median percentage of killing NB cells significantly increased in mice vaccinated with DNA–SL vs DNA–PEI: 10.2% vs 4.9% for TH, 23.8% vs 11.5% for Survivin, 21.23% vs 7.9% for PHOX2B (data shown for T:E ratio 1:25).
Fig. 2.
Splenocytes cytotoxicity against murine neuroblastoma cell line NB41A3 (105 cells) in two target to effector ratios (1:10 and 1:25): a TH (n = 4–5 mice per group), b Survivin (n = 6), c PHOX2B (n = 4–5). Median ± min/max. Each point on the graph corresponds to result from one animal. d Cytotoxic activity data normalized to the control in each experiment allowing to compare independently the effect of different antigens. The data demonstrate how many times the cytotoxic activity of splenocytes from vaccinated mice (CTAvac) was greater in relation to the corresponding control (CTAcont). Results obtained from mice vaccinated with DNA–PEI were normalized to the empty vector control and from mice vaccinated DNA–SL to the bacterial control. Mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01
Cytotoxic activity (CTA) of splenocytes after DNA vacination with different antigens was evaluated to reveal the most immunogeneic tumor-associated protein. To overcome the variations in cytotoxic response in different experiments induced by the dynamic settings, data were normalized to the corresponding control group and are depicted in Fig. 2d. There was a significant CTA increase in the following order of antigens: TH → Survivin → PHOX2B when they were conjugated with PEI. The immunogenecity of TH was lower than that of Survivin and PHOX2B (p < 0.05). Oral vaccination with SL produced comparable results for all three antigens (nearly 2 times higher than in control), but TH produced the best result. CTA after vaccination with DNA–PEI and DNA–SL had close values with a tendency of higher response induced by DNA–SL.
ELISPOT assay was performed to assess IFNγ secretion. Data are shown in Fig. 3a–c. Splenocytes were stimulated with peptide library of distinct antigens and with PVXCP protein. IFNγ production in response to PVXCP stimulation was demonstrated in 62.5% of vaccinated mice. The highest antigen-specific IFNγ secretion was detected in TH–PEI and PHOX2B–PEI groups after incubation with peptide libraries, 7.2 and 8.4 times higher (respectively) than in the control group. Mice vaccinated with bacterial form developed a stronger response to antigen stimulation. Thus, the level of IFNγ in TH-SL was 35 times higher and PHOX2B-SL was 11.6 times higher than in the placebo group. Vaccination with Survivin had no effect on the IFNγ production. To compare different antigens with each other, the same normalization to the control like in CTA analysis was performed (Fig. 3d). IFNγ response was considered positive if it exceeded double increase in comparison with the placebo group. There were no differences between antigens and delivery methods in response to PVXCP. DNA vaccination with TH was accompanied by higher IFNγ secretion (against peptide library) than other antigens with both carriers. When SL was used, TH was significantly more effective than Survivin (Chi square, p < 0.05). A quantity of IFNγ was higher for all antigens when they were used with PEI compared to SL (p = 0.03 for PHOX2B).
Fig. 3.
IFNγ enzyme-linked immunospot assay (ELISPOT) in mice vaccinated with TH (a), Survivin (b) and PHOX2B (c) 14 days after the third immunization. Splenocytes were stimulated by PVXCP protein or peptide library (PL) of target antigen. Mean ± SEM. Number of animals per group is the same as in Fig. 2a–c. d IFNγ spots data normalized to the control in each experiment. Data demonstrate how many times the IFNγ production by splenocytes from vaccinated mice (IFNγVac) was higher in relation to the corresponding control (IFNγCont). Results obtained from mice vaccinated with DNA–PEI were normalized to the empty vector control and from mice vaccinated with DNA–SL to bacterial control. Boxes above the dotted line shows the groups where the two times increase in cytokine production presents. Mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05
Titer of anti-PVXCP antibodies was not different from control group in all experiments.
Tumor progression in mice
Vaccination was performed according to the scheme shown in Fig. 4a. The dynamics of tumor progression was monitored during 30 days after the engraftment of NB cells. Tumor volume [mm3] was measured by digital caliper every 5 days. Histological analysis showed that engrafted NB was represented by solid layers of a malignant mesenchymal tumor tissue composed of large cells with round, light-colored nuclei with several hyperchromic nucleoli, and with very high mitotic activity (up to 30 mitoses/10HPF). In the tumor, foci of necrosis and foci of ingrowth into the skin were determined. In separate segments, the signs of the beginning of ganglion differentiation were observed (Fig. 4b).
Fig. 4.
a Scheme of DNA vaccination: A/J mice (n = 64) were vaccinated three times. Seven days before tumor engraftment (day 0) and on the 5th and 10th day after. They received 10 µg of plasmid DNA conjugated with polyethilenimine (DNA–PEI) intramuscularly or 108 cells of S.enterica containing DNA vaccine per os. b Histological slide of murine neuroblastoma which was grown from NB41A3 cell line
It was established that all types of the DNA vaccine used were able to slow down tumor growth (Fig. 5a–c). Among plasmid DNA carriers, PEI showed better results, when compared with Salmonella in all groups of mice. Median tumor volume after vaccination with TH–PEI on the 25th day was 918.2 vs 2328 mm3 with TH–SL (2664 mm3 in the control group). Comparable results were obtained from the mice vaccinated with Survivin. Final tumor volume after vaccination with Survivin–PEI was 2.7 times less than in control (512 vs 1417 mm3) and after vaccination with Survivin–SL two times less (1302 vs 2664 mm3). Immunization with PHOX2B antigen was the most successful in preventing tumor progression. PHOX2B–PEI vaccination led to median final NB tumor volume of 420 vs 2664 mm3 in the control group. PHOX2B–SL effect was reflected as 4.7 times decrease of tumor size (634 mm3).
Fig. 5.
a–c Dynamics of tumor progression in mice immunized with different antigens (TH, Survivin, PHOX2B) delivered with PEI or SL. Each control group included five mice, DNA–PEI and DNA–SL groups consisted of 5/5 for TH, 7/10 for Survivin and 7/7 mice for Phox2b. The data in each point represented as mean ± SEM of tumor volume. d The ratio of final tumor volume (Vt) of vaccinated to the control mice on the 25th day demonstrating decrease of tumor size when compared with a placebo group. Boxes below the dotted line shows the groups where growth of the tumor were slowed down. Mean ± SEM
Antitumor effect of vaccination with different antigens was compared by the ratio of mean tumor volume of experimental mice to control mice at the last time point (Fig. 5d). It was shown that vaccination with PHOX2B elicited the strongest antitumor effect when compared with TH or Survivin antigens. TH was the second most effective antigen in tumor containment and Survivin was the least effective.
Discussion
NB development is not associated with many molecular events, such as gene mutations, that can be therapeutically targeted [30]. In contrast to adult tumors, NB also expresses a limited number of different neoantigens on the tumor cell surface, thus restricting the possibilities for antibody-mediated therapies [31]. Therefore, tumor-associated antigens with aberrant expression have become an object of investigation. Intracellular localization makes it difficult to target by antibody, thus T-cell response becomes a key goal of immunization against TAA. The overexpression of self-proteins that are involved in cancer proliferation has been shown to be a mechanism by which self-proteins become immunogenic. Active immunization against them produces promising results in prevention of relapse. A short list of investigated NB targets include disialoganglioside GD2, mutated ALK, TH, Survivin, PHOX2B, PRAME, MYCN, MAGE-A1 and MAGE-A3 [2, 32]. There is experimental evidence that several of them elicit cellular and humoral immune response and influence tumor progression [11, 33–35]. Such immune response is directly dependent on immunogenicity of these antigens. In this study, we chose three NB-associated antigens with different functions. All of them have high aberrant expression in NB cells compared to healthy tissue. Our study confirmed their expression in murine NB cell line. PHOX2B was characterized by the highest expression level, which could be due to the undifferentiated status of NB41A3 cells, whereas PHOX2B is usually expressed in immature neuroblasts and drives them to adrenergic phenotype. The importance of PHOX2B gene for NB cancerogenesis has been already proven, but there are no experiments testing PHOX2B as a target for immunization [13]. TH is an important enzyme in catecholamine synthesis, and overexpression of TH and PHOX2B in patients’ tumor samples has recently been shown and used for monitoring the minimal residual disease [36]. Survivin regulates the perception of apoptotic signals in the cell and its overexpression is associated with poor prognosis because it inhibits chemotherapy-induced cell death and stress-induced cell death [28, 37]. Survivin takes the 21st place in the list of the most prospective tumor targets for immunotherapy [38]. In our predictive model, immunogenicity of antigens increased in the following order: TH → Survivin → PHOX2B. These results were only partially confirmed by our mouse experiments. In contrast to a computer model, where the TH was at the bottom of the list, in vivo analysis revealed that vaccination with Survivin showed the worst results in both immunogenicity and antitumor effects in NB model despite the higher expression level in NB41A3 cells. TH and PHOX2B competed for the best immunogenicity in different experiments. PHOX2B–PEI and TH–SL elicited the highest cytotoxic activity of T cells against target cells and enhanced IFNγ secretion in healthy mice, but PHOX2B elicited the strongest effect on tumor progression, which was approximately 50% slower than in the placebo group. It is hard to choose the best antigen from these two candidates, but we suggest that PHOX2B could be a promising target for DNA vaccination.
The target antigen is definitely one of the most important factors in immunotherapy effectiveness, but the delivery method of a DNA vaccine also plays a key role. Plasmid DNA is dramatically sensitive to cellular nucleases that requires additional protection. PEI is a cationic polymer usually used for in vitro transfection. It makes a stable complex with plasmid DNA that protects it from degradation in extracellular space and facilitates endocytosis and DNA delivery to the nucleus [37]. Whereas the escape of the cargo from the endosomes may be a limiting factor for the efficient transfection by nanoparticles, PEI is believed to facilitate this process by a proton sponge effect that leads to osmotic swelling and rupture of endosomes [40, 41]. It was shown that the DNA–PEI conjugate has stronger and more prolonged expression in the cell. We previously found that assembling DNA vaccine with PEI increased preparation’s immunogenicity (not published).
Salmonella enterica is also a well-studied delivery method with approved effectiveness. It is a member of the Enterobacteriaceae family that infects macrophages in an intestinal lymphoid cluster—Peyer’s patches, and proliferates there [42]. The attenuated strain cannot reproduce in the gut for long and just delivers the DNA vaccine to the local immune system. Besides, the bacterial cell serves as a shield from the surrounding threats and serves as an additional immunogenic stimulus, which activates innate immunity [43]. Both chemical and bacterial carriers are effective, but which method is more immunogenic is unknown. In immunogenicity study on healthy mice, oral vaccination with DNA–SL led to the significantly higher cytotoxic activity of splenocytes compared to the control group and compared to PEI for some antigens, but antigen-specific IFNγ secretion was higher after vaccination with DNA–PEI, which was the case for all antigens used (Fig. 3d). In the NB model, oral gavage with SL was not as effective as DNA–PEI injection (Fig. 5). The final tumor volume at the end of monitoring for all vaccines based on Salmonella was higher than that for DNA–PEI, whereas T-cell immune response (CTA and IFNγ) in mice with a tumor was similar to that in immunogenicity testing (data not shown). It is obvious that the high cytotoxic activity is not enough to inhibit tumor growth and coordinated activity of the two components of T-cell immunity (CD8 + and CD4 + Th1) is necessary. Also, rapid tumor growth and progression of NB41A3 promotes the formation of immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, which could be the reason of SL’s disability to overwhelm it. According to recent investigation, PEI reverses the differentiation of tumor-associated macrophages and modulates the activity of natural killer cells to kill the tumor cells. PEI was also found to repolarize myeloid-derived suppressor cells into the antitumor phenotype [17]. It is also possible that combined influence of tumor load and Salmonella infection could weaken the mice and give tumor an advantage. Mice vaccinated with SL demonstrated the signs of slight bacterial toxicity and inflammation (apathy, skin redness, bedraggled fur), while healthy mice tolerated well the dose of 1011 CFU of SL. It suggests that oral gavage of Salmonella as a vaccine carrier is less effective in therapeutic application than DNA–PEI vaccine.
It is worth noting that no significant elevation of specific anti-PVXCP antibodies of IgG and IgM classes was found in all experimental groups. It could be due to the absence of secretion of a sufficient amount of soluble protein capable of inducing a humoral immune response. In our case, such factors as bacterial plasmid DNA and intracellular localization of the native antigen, as well as the use of PEI, led to the formation of a Th1 immune response.
These results confirm that immunogenicity itself is not a guarantee of antitumor efficiency, and immunological and therapeutic response of different DNA vaccine delivery vehicles needs further research.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Dr. Aliaksandr A. Yarmishyn (Taipei Veterans General Hospital) for proofreading and editing this manuscript.
Abbreviations
- CTA
Cytotoxic activity
- HRNB
High-risk neuroblastoma
- IG
Immunogenicity
- PEI
Polyethylenimine
- NB
Neuroblastoma
- TAA
Tumor-associated antigens
- TH
Tyrosine hydroxylase
- PVXCP
Potato virus X coat protein
Author contributions
Animal experiments, in vitro assays, flow cytometry, data collection, statistical data analysis, interpretation of results, and writing of the manuscript: Maria V. Stegantseva; real-time PCR performance, plasmid DNA preparation, animal experiments: Veronika A. Shinkevich; oral gavage with Salmonella, monitoring of tumor progression in mice, participating in study design planning: Elena M. Tumar; design of the study, interpretation of results, preparation of the figures, and editing of the manuscript: Alexander N. Meleshko. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Funding
The study was funded by the Belarus Ministry of Health (Grant #20171462).
Availability of data and material
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethics approval
All animal experiments were conducted according to the Belarussian guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and approved by the ethics committee of the Institute of bioorganic chemistry of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Brodeur GM. Neuroblastoma: biological insights into a clinical enigma. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003;3(3):203–216. doi: 10.1038/nrc1014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cheung NKV, Dyer MA. Neuroblastoma: developmental biology, cancer genomics and immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;13(6):397–411. doi: 10.1038/nrc3526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Smith V, Foster J. High-risk neuroblastoma treatment review. Children. 2018;5(9):114. doi: 10.3390/children5090114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Meleshko AN, Petrovskaya NA, Savelyeva N, Vashkevich KP, Doronina SN, Sachivko NV. Phase I clinical trial of idiotypic DNA vaccine administered as a complex with polyethylenimine to patients with B-cell lymphoma. Hum Vaccines Immunother. 2017;13(6):1398–1403. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2017.1285477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ponomarenko DM, Klimova ID, Chapygina YA, Dvornichenko VV, Zhukova NV, Orlova RV, Shneider AM. Safety and efficacy of p62 DNA vaccine ELENAGEN in a first-in-human trial in patients with advanced solid tumors. Oncotarget. 2017;8(32):53730–53739. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Pierini S, Perales-Linares R, Uribe-Herranz M, Pol JG, Zitvogel L, Kroemer G, Galluzzi L. Trial watch: DNA-based vaccines for oncological indications. OncoImmunology. 2017 doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2017.1398878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Rice J, Ottensmeier CH, Stevenson FK. DNA vaccines: precision tools for activating effective immunity against cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8(2):108–120. doi: 10.1038/nrc2326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Carpentier AF, Rosenfeld MR, Delattre JY, Whalen RG, Posner JB, Dalmau J. DNA vaccination with HuD inhibits growth of a neuroblastoma in mice. Clin Cancer Res. 1998;4(11):2819–2824. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Huebener N, Fest S, Strandsby A, Michalsky E, Preissner R, Zeng Y, Lode HN. A rationally designed tyrosine hydroxylase DNA vaccine induces specific antineuroblastoma immunity. Mol Cancer Ther. 2008;7(7):2241–2251. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-08-0109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Fest S, Huebener N, Bleeke M, Durmus T, Stermann A, Woehler A, Lode HN. Survivin minigene DNA vaccination is effective against neuroblastoma. Intl J Cancer. 2009;125(1):104–114. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Stermann A, Huebener N, Seidel D, Fest S, Eschenburg G, Stauder M, Lode HN. Targeting of MYCN by means of DNA vaccination is effective against neuroblastoma in mice. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2015;64(10):1215–1227. doi: 10.1007/s00262-015-1733-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Woehler A, Huebener N, Fest S, Stermann A, Gaedicke G. A novel legumain DNA vaccine effectively eradicates neuroblastoma and induces long-term survival in vivo. Cancer Res. 2008;68(9):2686. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yang L, Ke XX, Xuan F, Tan J, Hou J, Wang M, Zhang Y. PHOX2B is associated with neuroblastoma cell differentiation. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2016;31(2):44–51. doi: 10.1089/cbr.2015.1952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Paster W, Zehetner M, Kalat M, Schüller S, Schweighoffer T. In vivo plasmid DNA electroporation generates exceptionally high levels of epitope-specific CD8 + T-cell responses. Gen Ther. 2003;10(9):717–724. doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3301942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.da Silva AJ, Zangirolami TC, Novo-Mansur MTM, de Campos Giordano R, Martins EAL. Live bacterial vaccine vectors: an overview. Braz J Microbiol. 2014;45(4):1117–1129. doi: 10.1590/S1517-83822014000400001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Eliyahu H, Barenholz Y, Domb AJ, Products N, Hebrew T. Polymers for DNA delivery. Molecules. 2005;10(1):34–64. doi: 10.3390/10010034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Shen C, Zhu J, Zhang Y, Li Y, Shen G, Zhu J, Tao J. Polyethylenimine-based micro/nanoparticles as vaccine adjuvants. Int J Nanomed. 2017;12:5443–5460. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S137980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Grant EV, Thomas M, Fortune J, Klibanov AM, Letvin NL. Enhancement of plasmid DNA immunogenicity with linear polyethylenimine. Eur J Immunol. 2012;42(11):2937–2948. doi: 10.1002/eji.201242410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yurina V. Live bacterial vectors—a promising DNA vaccine delivery system. Med Sci. 2018;6(2):27. doi: 10.3390/medsci6020027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Darji A, Zur Lage S, Garbe AI, Chakraborty T, Weiss S. Oral delivery of DNA vaccines using attenuated. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2000;27(4):341–349. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2000.tb01448.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pfaffl M. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29(9):2002–2007. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.9.e45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kim Y, Ponomarenko J, Zhu Z, Tamang D, Wang P, Greenbaum J. Immune epitope database analysis resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:W525–W530. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Nielsen M, Lundegaard C, Worning P, Lauemøller SL, Lamberth K, Buus S. Reliable prediction of T-cell epitopes using neural networks with novel sequence representations. Protein Sci. 2003;12:1007–1017. doi: 10.1110/ps.0239403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lundegaard C, Lamberth K, Harndahl M, Buus S, Lund O, Nielsen M. NetMHC-3.0: accurate web accessible predictions of Human, Mouse, and Monkey MHC class I affinities for peptides of length 8-11. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:W509–W512. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Andreatta M, Nielsen M. Gapped sequence alignment using artificial neural networks: application to the MHC class I system. Bioinformatics. 2016;32:511–517. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Peters B, Sette A. Generating quantitative models describing the sequence specificity of biological processes with the stabilized matrix method. BMC Bioinform. 2005;6:e132. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-6-132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sidney J, Assarsson E, Moore C, Ngo S, Pinilla C, Sette A. Quantitative peptide binding motifs for 19 human and mouse MHC class I molecules derived using positional scanning combinatorial peptide libraries. Immunome Res. 2008;4:e2. doi: 10.1186/1745-7580-4-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hagenbuchner J, Kiechl-Kohlendorfer U, Obexer P, Ausserlechner MJ. BIRC5/Survivin as a target for glycolysis inhibition in high-stage neuroblastoma. Oncogene. 2016;35(16):2052–2061. doi: 10.1038/onc.2015.264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Calis JA, Maybeno M, Greenbaum JA, Weiskopf D, De Silva AD, Sette A, Peters B. Properties of MHC class I presented peptides that enhance immunogenicity. PLoS Comput Biol. 2013 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kholodenko IV, Kalinovsky DV, Doronin II, Deyev SM, Kholodenko RV. Neuroblastoma origin and therapeutic targets for immunotherapy. J Immunol Res. 2018 doi: 10.1155/2018/7394268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Johnsen JI, Dyberg C, Fransson S, Wickström M. Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets in neuroblastoma. Pharmacol Res. 2018;131:164–176. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2018.02.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Corrias MV, Scaruffi P, Occhino M, De Bernardi B, Tonini GP, Pistoia V. Expression of MAGE-1, MAGE-3 and MART-1 genes in neuroblastoma. Int J Cancer. 1996;69(5):403–407. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19961021)69:5<403::AID-IJC9>3.0.CO;2-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Berger E, Soldati R, Huebener N, Hohn O, Stermann A, Durmus T, Fest S. Salmonella SL7207 application is the most effective DNA vaccine delivery method for successful tumor eradication in a murine model for neuroblastoma. Cancer Lett. 2013;331(2):167–173. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2012.12.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kiyonari S, Kadomatsu K. Neuroblastoma models for insights into tumorigenesis and new therapies. Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2015;10(1):53–62. doi: 10.1517/17460441.2015.974544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Fest S, Huebener N, Weixler S, Bleeke M, Zeng Y, Strandsby A, Lode HN. Characterization of GD2 peptide mimotope DNA vaccines effective against spontaneous neuroblastoma metastases. Cancer Res. 2006;66(21):10567–10575. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sukhareva EV, Kalinina TS, Bulygina VV, Dygalo NN. Tyrosine hydroxylase of the brain and it’s regulation by glucocorticoids. Vavilov J Genet Breed. 2016;20(2):212–219. doi: 10.18699/VJ16.156. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Chen X, Duan N, Zhang C, Zhang W. Survivin and tumorigenesis: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic strategies. J Cancer. 2016;7(3):314–323. doi: 10.7150/jca.13332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Cheever MA, Allison JP, Ferris AS, Finn OJ, Hastings BM, Hecht TT. The prioritization of cancer antigens: a national cancer institute pilot project for the acceleration of translational research. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:5323–5337. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Oh YK, Suh D, Kim JM, Choi HG, Shin K, Ko JJ. Polyethylenimine-mediated cellular uptake, nucleus trafficking and expression of cytokine plasmid DNA. Gene Ther. 2002;9(23):1627–1632. doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3301735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Behr JP. The proton sponge: a trick to enter cells the viruses did not exploit. Chimia. 1997;51(1–2):34–36. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wojnilowicz M, Glab A, Bertucci A, Caruso F, Cavalieri F. Super-resolution imaging of proton sponge-triggered rupture of endosomes and cytosolic release of small interfering RNA. ACS Nano. 2019;13(1):187–202. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.8b05151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hegazy WAH, Hensel M. Salmonella enterica as a vaccine carrier. Fut Microbiol. 2012;7(1):111–127. doi: 10.2217/fmb.11.144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Hernández-Luna MA, Luria-Pérez R. Cancer immunotherapy: priming the host immune response with live attenuated salmonella enterica. J Immunol Res. 2018 doi: 10.1155/2018/2984247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.




