Throughout the article by Hool et al. (2023), the unit micromolar (μM) was incorrectly changed to micrometre (μm) during Wiley's production stage.
All instances of μm throughout the article should read as μM, except for the following instances:
Scale bars.
The sentence from the Methods section ‘Square ROIs (20 × 20 pixels, or 3.5 μm × 3.5 μm), were manually placed using a custom software on identified supporting cells in the proximity of hair cells (Fig. 5) using an average of fluorescence images captured using 385 nm excitation or a brightfield image as reference.’
The sentence from the Methods section ‘The z‐stack images were taken with 0.5 μm incremental steps.’
We apologise for this error.